Stephen Lendman is Trotskyite controlled opposition

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 29, 2018

Opinion writer Stephen Lendman is the quintessential alternative media Putin and Trump cheerleader these days.

He seemed to ride in a decade ago among the patriot movement on the coattails of anti-Zionism, even though he appears to believe in a pure form of Zionism that is true to Torah. Once, upon entering online conspiracy circles (as far back as 2006?), Lendman had stripped away the guard of truthers, he was able to bring in his real agenda: Trotskyite communism, which naturally entails promoting the de-Stalinized crypto-Soviet state of Russia, headed by organized crime-installed Vladimir Putin and run by international Jewish crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch.

Initially, Lendman got his push from big alt media aggregates like Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero, and others. He is an associate for another apparent Jewish Trotskyite, the pro-Russian, pro-Trump Michel Chossudovsky and his Centre for Research on Globalization (GlobalReseearch.ca). Lendman hasn’t become huge, but he has been a consistent Trotskyite voice in the alt media. He was cheerleading Russia long before it became popular for the Alt Media to do so.

Lendman starts off his latest Kremlin-backed public relations piece with,

“US-led Western media reporting on Russia is consistently hostile, a disturbing near-daily tirade of disinformation, Big Lies and fake news.”

Ironic considering Jewish-led alternative media reporting on Russia is consistently favourable to the Reds, and even more disturbingly, carries out daily rants about how the Russians (Soviets) are supposedly saving the planet from the banksters and reviving Christianity and nationalism. You’d be hard-pressed to find even one major alternative media personality who criticizes Russia. Go on. I challenge you to find just one. In that same article, Lendman completely dismisses the fact of the Kremlin’s online troll farming, like that of the Internet Research Agency, which is part of the Soviet’s Perestroika psychological warfare plan, not just a division but the core basis of its intelligence apparatus.

Getting back to Lendman’s latest desinformatsiya piece, Lendman vents his seeming outrage at the “notorious Russophobic” Anne Applebaum. Gotta love the irony of Jews criticizing their fellow controlled opposition Jews, sort of like the Trotskyite-Zionist approved fake anti-communist American Jewish League Against Communism, which was largely funded by Bernard Baruch. The anti-Communist McCarthyite movement was entirely controlled by Jews—one of the reasons being to take the heat off of Jews when it came to fingering them as leading the worldwide communist conspiracy. It’s a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup. Lendman, apparently, is another fox. There are many just like him in the alternative media. Nobody seems to be deviating from the pro-Russian script. Nobody except for a few voices with not much of a platform.

Those are just some examples, but Lendman stops at nothing to portray Russia as a perfect angel and saviour of humanity. He deliberately is misleading his audience.

I did a search of Lendman’s site using the term “Perestroika Deception”, which obviously is my latest obsession, and I came across two references, but they were to only “Perestroika” and they were just brief references to Gorbachev’s public Perestroika program. You would think a man like Lendman certainly would have come across Antatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika thesis. But it’s completely absent. And for good reason. It’s the thesis that would put Lendman out of business, as well as dismantle the entire Judeo-Soviet ruse that has hypnotized the West and launched into Cold War 2.0 theatrics.

Anti-Jewish (chassidic) Stalinist era propaganda. Now that Stalinism has been purged from the crytpo-Soviet Russian state, we are seeing the re-Judaizing of Russia and ever stronger ties between Israel and Russia.

Lendman seems to believe that throwing in the odd piece about the plight of the Palestinians will legitimize his disinformation operation to the alternative media audience. He also seems to believe that blaming the U.S. government (not the true culprits in Israel and the Zionist lobby) for the 9/11 conspiracy helps him pass the Truther litmus test. So far, it has worked. Doing a cursory search, I could not find anything remotely critical of Lendman and his work. He is blindly accepted by the truther movement and promoted.

“It’s why growing thousands of Jews globally oppose an ideology based on power, conquest, dispossession, and violation of the most fundamental Jewish ethical and moral teachings, ones Zionists disdain,” Lendman writes in his seemingly anti-Zionist sympathizing with the Jews Against Zionism movement. Where can be found these Jewish “ethical and moral teachings”? Lendman doesn’t really explain. It’s difficult to pinpoint what kind of Jew Lendman is. He could be Orthodox but he could also be liberal or reform (he calls himself “progressive”).

In a review of Lendman’s works, James Petras stated,

“…Lendman’s essays are a major contribution to the struggle for social justice in America.”

Yikes.

Lendman’s apparent left-leaning defence of de-Stalinized Russia is definitely Trotskyite, in some sense. He could be part of a joint ADL-FBI COINTELPRO operation, the way the anti-Stalin communist New York Jews of the McCarthyite era were. And what does it say that the alternative media continues to give Lendman a platform?

Lendman appears to be aiding the Soviet long-range Perestroika strategy to feign Russian democratization while radicalizing and destabilizing the West. With Lendman, throw in some world war fear mongering and you have a unique psyop.

The overall plan is to lull the West to sleep about the communist threat in order to ripen it for a world communistic government takeover, with Russia leading it militarily and Israel bringing us goyim into spiritual enlightenment. The lulling involves both the Left and the Right. The plan has no loyalty to either.

The rise of the radial left (social justice, identity politics, et al) in the West is proof of Perestroika success.

Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice run by Kremlin-backed master freemason

Bogdanov in his masonic black and white (dualism) attire.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 27, 2018 Anno Domini

While the West struggles with the growing militancy of social justice in its own lands, a little known organization is bringing the movement back to where it started—Russia…if it ever left in the first place.

What more fitting than for the humanist international masonic brotherhood to be championing it. Forty-eight-year-old Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Russia (Scottish Rite) Andrei Vladimirovich Bogdanov helped found the Communist Party of Social Justice (Коммунистическая партия социальной справедливости) in 2012 (1) as a means for constructing a social state, presumably with social justice as its focus. Of course, the movement and its stated mission assume the narrative that communism and its Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s and Russia became democratized, thus the need for communism to be re-introduced in Russia.

Looking deeper, though, it turns out the entire thing is an elaborate ruse by the crypto-Soviet state to further its Perestroika deception (it’s fake collapse of communism and restructuring to democratization), as revealed by Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. (2)

Russia’s grand master mason is suspected of participating in a false opposition campaign against current Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2008 presidential election in Russia. Putin, who has been in power since 1999, has been viewed by some analysts as routinely setting up strawmen opponents in order to create the illusion of choice and free elections in Russia during his decades-long stay in power (elections require a minimum of two candidates in order to take place). All of this was predicted by Golitsyn in the 1960s and ‘80s.

Bogdanov, who previously handled public relations for Putin’s United Russia Party, denies accusations that he is a Kremlin stooge, even though he also avoids fierce criticism of Putin and praises Dmitry Medvedev (Putin’s planned successor at the time). What’s more, Bogdanov managed to garner 2 million signatures—despite only collecting 89,000 votes for his Democratic Party during the previous parliamentary election—to run as an independent candidate against Putin in the presidential election in March 2008. (3)

In 2013, the Communist Party of Social Justice won one seat in the city Parliament.

Bogdanov not only validates the claim that he is a Putin puppet in the following statement, but he simultaneously furthers the Perestroika deception, which involves a long-range strategy of weakening the West through subversion and psychological warfare.

“Democracy in Russia will be even better than in the United States within two or three, maximum five years.” (4)

The logo for Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice.

Putin’s official opposition is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), the successor to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union (CPSU). It currently has 42 representatives in the State Duma. By contrast, Putin’s United Party has 339. The opposition’s continued existence suggests that, according to Golitsyn’s theory, Putin and his crypto-communist kahal control the opposition as a way of furthering the lie that Russia’s government is opposed to communism and is, instead, democratic. If Russia were truly democratizing, would there a be a communist party at all, much less allowed as the official opposition? You would think that after witnessing all the horrors of communism the new democratic state would have banned communism altogether.

Likewise, the seeming opposition between the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and Bogdanov’s Communist Party of Social Justice appears to be yet another dialectic—a sort of controlled opposition to the controlled opposition, with all three being in on the scam together. The CPRF supposedly has even admitted that Bogdanov’s party is backed by the Kremlin, although it feels Putin backed it in order to steal votes from CPRF. Again, this claim only feeds the Perestroika deception by making it seem that Putin doesn’t want the CPRF (the communists) to win. This is how intricate and complex Soviet strategy is. The West is entirely ignorant of this. But if they simply learned about dialectics (especially dialectics within dialectics), they would begin to understand.

“The deployment of controlled ‘political opposition’ has rendered possible the introduction of deceptive ‘non-Communist’ and ‘democratic’ structures,” warns Golitsyn. “Even so- called free elections do not present a problem for the Communist Parties. Because of their secret partnership with the ‘opposition’, the Communist Parties are always in a winning situation. It is their candidates – Communist or ‘non-Communisf -who always win. No other truly independent candidates exist.”(5)

Golitsyn detailed in his 1988 book, The Perestroika Deception, how the crypto-Soviet state actually embraces the concept of the European Union, as it will make integration between the West and Russia’s world government communistic system that more easy.

Bogdanov hints at this very concept when he told The Moscow Times in 2008, “Russia also needs to join NATO or, rather, merge with a new military block in which only European countries will participate. Russia’s integration into European institutions has been a major theme of his long-shot campaign.” (6) Is this Bogdanov’s idea? No. It comes from the Central Committee and their Perestroika psych warfare division.

Interestingly, with the knowledge that freemasonry helped establish the communist revolution in Russia, Bogdanov appears to corroborate another Golitsyn theory: that the crypto-Soviet state would make superficial concessions to the Russian Orthodox Church in order to further the perception of Russia’s democratization. Bogdanov told The Moscow Times of a church they passed by that was built by a freemason.

Logo for the #1 Harmony Grand Lodge of Moscow. Notice the rotated Jewish hexagram.

“Do you remember a church we passed on the way here, built by the architect Vasily Bazhenov? He was also a Freemason,” he said. “There are Masonic symbols inside, and legend has it that not a single piece of glass was broken there when the church was captured by the French troops and then retaken by the Russians.” (7)

Visit enough Orthodox churches and you will inevitably encounter some of these masonic symbols blasphemously implanted on the iconostasis, in other paintings, and such. Freemasonry played a leading role in the Russian Revolution, as it did in the French Revolution—working side by side with revolutionary Jews.

The masons have always liked the idea of allowing a passive Christianity to exist, so long as they are allowed to infiltrate and run it—the masons’ own false opposition system. And that’s exactly what they did following the revolutions, first with the Catholic Church and now with the Russian Orthodox Church. Both institutions are now completely in the hands of the enemy.

The Russian Orthodox Church not only has masons to contend with but Soviets as well. It is run by mostly “former” Soviet agents, with the Patriarch of Russia, the highest position, being occupied by “former” KGB agent Kirill. Putin and Kirill are both suspected of being freemasons.

This sham Russian revival of Orthodoxy and democracy has fooled the world, especially nationalists in the West. But it’s just another Judeo-masonic trick. Golitsyn said that until Western nationalists give up their failed methods of geo-political analysis, they will never catch on to how the game really works.

Notes:

1. Communist Party of Social Justice – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Social_Justice

2. The Contemplative Observer, Anatoliy Golitsyn: The Key to Understanding Today’s World Situation, Feb. 14, 2013 – https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/anatoliy-golitsyn-the-key-to-understanding-todays-world-situation/

3. Sweeney, Conor, Presidential candidate Bogdanov denies Kremlin ties, January 30, 2008, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-election-bogdanov/presidential-candidate-bogdanov-denies-kremlin-ties-idUSL2949331420080130

4. ibid

5. Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception—The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 87

6. Abdullaev, Nabi, Bogdanov Campaigns With Grandmother, Marc 6, 2008, The Moscow Times, https://web.archive.org/web/20080306090027/http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2008/02/26/003.html

7. ibid

 

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 155-158

The best known Soviet spy in history was the late British turncoat, H. A. R. “Kim” Philby. But “the rest of the story” about Philby’s intrigue was kept under wraps for nearly half a century. The truth is Philby was not just a KGB agent. He was also doubling as an agent for yet another intelligence agency—Israel’s Mossad. Only The Spotlight, the Washington-based populist weekly, told the amazing story—one which points to a “hidden history” of intrigue that has been deliberately suppressed by the “mainstream” media in the West.

In its June 25, 1984 issue, The Spotlight reported on a highly-classified summary of East-bloc espionage operations compiled in April of 1984 by Defense Department analysts. (A copy of that report was provided by well-placed sources to Andrew St. George, the chief diplomatic correspondent for The Spotlight.)

The summary cited several instances when covert agents from the KGB, the Soviet Union’s primary intelligence agency, joined forces with agents of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, to penetrate U.S. targets. Philby was among those who provided aid to the Mossad.

The study revealed that veteran CIA official William King Harvey ran afoul of the KGB and the Mossad as early as 1942 when he concluded a high-level investigation with a report denouncing Philby, then a top British counterintelligence official, as a Soviet“mole,” that is, a long-range covert Soviet penetration agent.

At the time, Philby was serving in Washington as the chief liaison officer between British and American intelligence, giving him access to the U.S. government’s most closely guarded security secrets.
What the other evidence in the Pentagon summary regarding Philby revealed—but which went unreported in all of the “mainstream” media accounts of the Philby affair—was that while Philby was spying for the Soviets, he was also working as an agent for the cause of political Zionism since the early 1940s.

A Russian memorial to British Zionist triple agent Kim Philby, who helped the Soviets.

This was well before the emergence of Israel as a sovereign state and the formation of the Mossad, which, according to former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, functions as “the real engine of policy” in Israel.

The Pentagon report revealed that in 1932, Philby was married in Vienna, Austria to Litzi Friedman, a communist organizer who was also active on behalf of the Zionist cause. Present at the nuptials were several key figures who later assumed leading roles in Israeli espionage. Among them were “Teddy” Kollek, who became much better known as the future longtime mayor of Jerusalem, and Jacob Meridor, one of the founders and directors of the Mossad.

When Harvey exposed Philby as a Red spy, he also cast doubt on Philby’s close friend, James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s director of counterintelligence who was also the CIA’s liaison to the Mossad and a faithful supporter of the Zionist cause.

Angleton and the Mossad felt threatened by Harvey’s unmasking of Philby as a Soviet mole. Soon enough, rumours began to circulate in Washington of Harvey’s “heavy drinking” and “scandalous” behaviour, with the rumours being fed directly to the White House.

In 1967, President Johnson fired Harvey from his CIA post and he retired in disgrace. As The Spotlight put it: “The leading American spymaster of the post-World War II era, who had exposed Philby and other major communist spies, spent his last years working for a publishing company in a dead-end job. He died in 1976 of a heart attack, obscure, poorly paid, and lonely.

(Ironically, in recent years, there was a fraudulent attempt to link Harvey to the JFK assassination, with the outlandish suggestion that Harvey had worked hand-in-glove with his longtime enemy,Angleton, and Angleton’s CIA lieutenants, in arranging the president’s murder. Nothing, could be further from the truth.)

In reality, Harvey was right. Philby was ultimately exposed as a major Soviet penetration agent and ultimately confessed, fleeing to Moscow where he ultimately died.

Today’s Russian president Vladimir Putin, a fake nationalist, is from the KGB mold.

Angleton’s fate was somewhat similar. In a long-suppressed top secret report (which was cited in the Pentagon summary described by The Spotlight), a senior CIA security official, C. Edward Petty, concluded that Angleton may have been a Soviet-Israeli penetration agent while he made his way to the top of the CIA bureaucracy.

The Petty report suggested that Angleton, throughout his career as the dominant figure in U.S. counterintelligence, had slipped vital information to both the Soviet Union and Israel. The report was submitted to President Gerald Ford in April of 1975, but a political decision was made that the evidence was not sufficient to indict and try Angleton, largely because it would have been impossible to stage a public trial of an intelligence official who was privy to as many secrets as Angleton was.

Instead, then-CIA director William Colby fired Angleton, enraging the Israeli lobby which had relied for so long on Angleton’s key placement in the counterintelligence bureaucracy. Angleton retired and died a broken man on May 11, 1987.

On December 14, 1998, The Spotlight was the only newspaper on the planet to publish a suppressed fact about the otherwise widely-publicized secrets about KGB espionage that were revealed with the release of the fabled Soviet diplomatic cables that were secretly decrypted beginning in 1946 by the U.S. Army Signals Security Agency and code-named “Venona.”

Military historian Ulick Steadman described the Venona venture as “an historic achievement,” but noted that there was “a shocking twist.” In fact, a vast majority of the alien agents unmasked by the decoded Soviet cables turned out to be active in Zionist circles rather than merely in the Communist underground. According to H. Dexter Gamage, who served as a Pentagon cryptography analyst, the Venona files revealed that Zionists “made up three-fourths of the enemy spies recruited by the Soviets” in the United States.

As a consequence, at the time the Venona project was under way, Gen. Omar Bradley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ordered the intercepts withheld from President Truman, because—according to Steadman—Bradley was “concerned that anything known to the White House would soon become known to the Zionist insiders [surrounding the president] and subsequently to the Soviets” who would discover that their cables were being intercepted.

Beginning in 1995-1996 portions of the Venona decryptions were finally released to great fanfare. However, significant portions of those long top secret documents have never been released, nor was a list of the Kremlin’s spies, each of whom was identified by name and code name.The identity of those spies is most interesting indeed.

In the original Soviet messages, a large number of operatives were marked with the letter “K” for “KRYSY” (i.e.“Rats”). “KRYSY” was the contemptuous Soviet code designation for the Zionist operatives under its control. In the version of these documents made public in the United States, The Spotlight revealed, the “K” designation was erased before release, reportedly by State Department censors.
A review by The Spotlight’s inimitable Andrew St. George of 35 decoded Soviet messages came up with 20 names of Zionist operatives in Moscow’s service. The same documents revealed only four Communist agents who had no apparent ethnic links to Zionism.

These more recent revelations certainly confirm other evidence we have examined that there really was a split at the highest levels between the Zionists and the Russian nationalists in the USSR during thee final days of the Stalin era and well into the years that followed.

This was a major secret element in the development of the Cold War—a rift that laid the groundwork for the rise of the pro-Zionist “neoconservative” network that has ultimately proven to be one of the most dangerous of America’s Enemies Within.

Until American patriots—real patriots—confront and understand these hidden elements within history, which cast a starkly different perspective on the events of the second half of the 20th century, it will be impossible to begin the process of winning back America—in the 21st century—from the hands of the Judas Goats: The Enemy Within.

The old labels of “liberal” and “conservative” just simply do not apply any more and a lot of the legends of the past—particularly of the Cold War era—must be recognized as precisely that: ‘legends.”

In the chapters that follow, we will examine additional evidence pointing to the role of so-called American “anti-communists” in shifting, bending, distortingm and destroying legitimate anti-communist movements for the benefit of the Zionist agenda.

As we shall see, there is much more to the story of the “McCarthy Era” and the “conservative” forces that began to align in that period than we have been led to believe.

The Little-Understood Struggle Between Stalin-Era Soviet Communism and Zionism

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 144-154

The twin forces of Bolshevism and Zionism have often collaborated on many fronts throughout the 20th century—both alien forces having evolved in the closing years of the 19th century. However,there have been conflicts between the two philosophies that remain little understood even by many who have devoted much study to both forces.

While there are many who view Bolshevism and Zionism as two heads of a single snake (and a two-headed snake does, in fact, exist, as biologists have reported) the realities of 20th century geopolitical struggles suggest that there is much more to the story.

In fact, there were sharp differences between the Russian nationalists (led by Josef Stalin) and the Jewish internationalists led by Stalin’s arch-enemy, Leon Trotsky.

By the time of the Cold War, following the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel in 1948, many traditional Trotskyites began a trans-mogrification process, evolving, particularly in the United States, into the leaders of an anti-Stalinist element that emerged as the hard-line pro- Israel bloc that came to be known as today’s “neo-conservatives.”

This is, of course, a cursory overview of a complicated and often confusing international struggle between revolutionary elements, both of which have been hostile to American interests. A detailed history of this struggle would go far beyond the purview of this volume. However, the fact remains that the modern-day disciples of Trotskyism are key figures among The Enemy Within, twisting old-fashioned conservatism into a divisive and destructive force that is utilizing America’s military might, the blood of its children, and its national treasure to enforce a global Zionist imperium—in short, a New World Order.

At the time of Stalin’s death in 1953—the circumstances of which suggest that he was certainly “helped” to his death—the Soviet leader was becoming openly and actively hostile to political Zionism. According to a July 27, 1967 report published in the American Examiner, the Jewish Telegraph Agency reported that:

Josef Stalin died 14 years ago of a rage caused when the Politburo opposed his proposal that all Russian Jews be expelled to Siberia, The Detroit News has reported from Washington . . . The story alleged that Stalin called a secret Politburo meeting to announce a campaign against the Jews. He said measures should be taken to deport Jews en masse to Biro Bidjan in Siberia . . .

Lazar Kaganovich, [the] only Jewish member of the Politburo and Stalin’s brother-in-law, tore up his party card and threw the pieces in Stalin’s face, said The News.

The report said that Stalin then turned purple with rage . . . Stalin rose from his chair, according to the account, began screaming incoherently and fell unconscious.An hour later, physicians pronounced him dead.

Although this teasingly and provocatively written news report—aimed at Jewish audiences—never said, flat out, that Stalin had been murdered, the intent of the report was very clear: in short, that Zionist interests in Russia had murdered the Soviet strongman because he was planning new offensives against Zionism.

In their 2003 book, Stalin’s Last Crime, Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov published evidence that Stalin was almost certainly murdered in 1953 after he began moving toward exorcising Zionist influence in Soviet circles of power.

Describing Stalin’s moves against the Zionist elements in Russia, Brent and Naumov wrote that if Stalin had not been removed from power,“much subsequent world history might have been quite different.” They added:

Many leading Kremlin figures would have been purged and probably shot; the security services and the military would have been decimated by purges; Soviet intellectuals and artists, particularly Jews, would have been mercilessly suppressed; and the surviving remnant of Soviet and Eastern European Jewry would have been gravely (perhaps mortally) imperiled, while grievous suffering would have been inflicted on all the citizens of the Soviet Union. Another Great Terror, such as occurred in the late 1930s, was averted when Stalin suddenly died on March 5, 1953. Stalin’s version of a “final solution” remained unfulfilled . . .

And although even today there are those—including many legitimate and traditional American anti-communists—who believe Stalin was actually in alliance with Zionist interests, as evidenced by his immediate recognition of the State of Israel, Brent and Naumov comment that in 1948,“The Jews and Israel were not yet the enemies of the Soviet state they soon became.” So the point is this: a very real rift—one long in development—between Stalin and the Zionist (and Trotskyite) elements was very much a reality, popular legend notwithstanding.

In fact, by 1952, when Stalin was intensifying his public (and behind-the-scenes) campaign against Zionism in Russia, Brent and Naumov point out that the irony that many American Jewish spies for the Soviet Union would have found it hard to imagine that they were working for “a country whose leaders soon thereafter would turn against the entire Jewish population of the Soviet Union and, at the high- est governmental levels, was seriously considering the idea of the detention and deportation of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent people.”

In fact, in the Jan/Feb 2003 issue of The Barnes Review—the Revisionist history journal published by Willis A. Carto—Russian nationalist historian, Dr.OlegPlatonov, offered readers a fascinating history of Russia’s historic troubles with Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Bolshevik agitation—the proverbial two-headed snake. Platonov, asserted, flat-out, that Stalin had indeed launched a major offensive against Zionism.The words of Platonov, one of the leading Russian intellectuals today, and who is in the forefront of the fight against Zionist influence in 21st Century Russia, are worth reviewing. Platonov wrote:

The Jewish-Bolshevik rule over Russia was broken by Stalin who, in the second half of the 1930s, carried out a counter-revolution and stripped the carriers of the Zionist ideology of their power. In the 1930s and 1940s, no less than 800,000 Jewish Bolsheviks were annihilated under the leadership of Stalin—the elite of the anti-Russian organization which had planned to transform Russia into a Jewish state. Nearly all Jewish leaders were purged, and the chances of the remaining ones to regain power were reduced to a minimum.The last years of Stalin’s life were dedicated to the uprooting of Zionism and the liquidation of the organizations associated with it.

Dr. Platonov added these highly relevant details:

After Stalin’s death, everything changed abruptly. The state was taken over by people bent on the restoration of Jewish Bolshevism . . .The renaissance of Zionism continued during the entire government of N. S. Khruschev.

The situation somewhat improved under Brezhnev, who secretly limited the number of Jews in government positions. As a matter of fact, these measures were rarely put into practice, and both secret and open Zionists found many ways to elude them.

From the 1950s to the 1970s, a powerful fifth column spearheaded by the carriers of the Zionist ideology arose in Russia. Many of its leading figures were sons or grandsons of Bolshevik revolutionaries.

These very people later became the most active elements of the so-called perestroika, which led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the assumption of political power by the Jews and the transfer of a considerable part of Russia’s national wealth to foreign countries.

Today, of course, the fight against Zionist influence in Russia has expanded considerably, and Russia’s current president,Vladimir Putin, is increasingly under the gun from American-based (and worldwide) Zionist elements who view the so-called“Russian strongman”as a potential threat. (In a later chapter, we’ll discuss Putin further.)

The point that we need to focus on—and which must be emphasized—is that the break between Stalin and the Zionists, which began in the 1930s and which reached a fever pitch at the time of Stalin’s assassination in 1953, led specifically to events in the United States which played a major part in behind-the-scenes intrigue in the so-called “Cold War.“ This led to the establishment of the power bloc that today—in the 21st century—is known as the “neo-conservative” movement: that is, the Zionist-Trotskyite globalist warmongers who are using the wealth and power of the United States to enforce their world imperium.

In 1914, no less than V. I. Lenin wrote of Trotsky:“Comrade Trotsky has never yet possessed a definite opinion on any single, earnest Marxian question: he has always crept into the breach made by this or that difference, and has oscillated from one side to another.” And this reflects precisely the way so many American Trotskyites—who became the neo-conservatives—actually shifted their own agenda in order to fit with the times, particularly as elements within the Soviet government continued, behind the scenes, to agitate against Zionist influence.

So although many American anti-communists (and outright anti- Zionists and anti-Semites) were caught up in the theory that Soviet Communism (even under Stalin) had been largely a “Jewish” project, so to speak, there were a few discerning voices who recognized that the fight between Stalin and Trotsky had a definitive“Jewish slant”that need- ed to be examined in careful context.

In the late 1950s, John H. Monk, the American nationalist and frankly anti-Semitic editor of the Texas-based journal, Grass Roots, published a remarkable essay entitled “Let Us Look Into This Thing Called ‘Trotsky Communism.’” He concluded after an extensive review of the history of the conflict between Stalin and Trotsky that, put simply: “Trotsky Communism and Soviet Communism are enemies.” In Soviet Russia, as Monk noted, beginning in the late 1930s, “top ranking Jews began at that time toppling from their high seats,” and that “Russia at last had gotten her eyes open [and that] the good work started in 1928 with the exiling of Trotsky” by Josef Stalin. He added, quite pointedly:

Just recently, the Anti-Defamation League issued a special bulletin in which it wept sorely because the Russian Jews used to fill, back in 1935, ten percent of the high seats in the empire, and now they have only “one half of one per- cent” and it is shaky. No wonder the American Jew-Trotsky gang invented the slogan:“Down with Communism!”They mean Russia.

Monk pointed out that the Zionist movement and affiliated groups such as the ADL had quickly aligned themselves with the Trotskyite movement that set up shop in the United States—in New York City in particular—upon Trotsky’s exile from Russia.“If we run with the Trotsky Communist slogan, ‘Down with the Communists,” we automatically become partisans of the filthiest underground that has ever existed any- where on this earth:Trotsky Communism.”

Monk’s essays on this controversial topic were even reprinted by famed Lyrl Clark Van Hyning in her popular Women’s Voice newsletter, which no one ever accused of being a “communist” journal.

On September 15, 1969, writing in the popular American nationalist newspaper, Common Sense, which had, over the years, frequently featured the works of outspoken Jewish-born American anti-Zionist spokesman Benjamin Freedman, one Morris Horton (under his pen name “Fred Farrell”) wrote a fascinating assessment of the reality of Trotskyite Communism. Horton wrote in part:

Originally “Communism” was nothing but a tool of the wealthy American Jews of New York. In the United States, and in much of the rest of the world, it is still just that. Let us now address ourselves to a question important to anyone who really wants to understand Communism:“What is the difference between a Stalinist and a Trotskyite? Some people will tell you:“All Communists are alike.”

This is a dangerous piece of shallow misinformation. It is acceptable only if you are willing to substitute shallow sloganeering for real knowledge.A Stalinist represents primordial Russian nationalism. A Trotskyite represents the Jewish interests of New York City. The Jewish interests of New York suffered a terrific setback one day many years ago, when a taciturn hood planted an ax in Leon Trotsky’s skull in a villa in Mexico.

The world Communist conspiracy is not a Russian conspiracy; it is an American Jewish conspiracy.Today it is falling into great disrepute around the world. America is being blamed for supporting communism around the world. Unhappily, the charge is true. New York is the real hub of the conspiracy. If some of our Anti-Communists would stand up four square and tell this plain truth, we might possibly yet be liberated from Jewish misrule. Few of them ever do.

Most of the Communists and many of the Anti- Communists are on the same payroll, the Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other.The first basic rule of this sham battle is:“Never drag any real truth into the matter on either side; tell anything else you want to tell, but never tell the truth.” This is the basic background of most of the phony “experts” on Communism who have been “experting” about it for forty years and haven’t made a dent in it.

Horton was particularly adamant in pointing out that the American “anti-Communist” movement was increasingly falling into the hands of very real Communists—the Trotskyites—who in the guise of “fighting Communism” were actually working to introduce it into the American system.This is a point that few anti-communists understood then and even today they find it difficult to digest. Horton wrote:

These people generate the literature on Communism that is generally available to the American public.They have no interest in providing any genuinely valid information. Their aim is to manipulate public opinion.

Therefore, they seek to divide the Gentile.They seek to make the middle class believe that the working class is allied to Red Russia; All of this is, and always was, pure hallucination, generated by Jewish intellectual quacks in order to pro- mote a minority tyranny over the American Majority.

In his essay, Horton emphasized that the age-old labels of “Right” and “Left” no longer had any real meaning—a point that even many legitimate and self-styled modern-day American “conservatives” of the 21st century have yet to realize:

There is no genuine validity in either the “Right” or “Left” positions in politics. These are artificial, Jew-invented positions. Jewish control of communications is absolutely essential to the success of this power system. Jewish political quackery would not long survive exposure.

The Right-Left Age is the Jewish Age, and it is an age which, on the world stage, is now receding into the past. If America continues to live in this Jewish past, then America has no future.

Horton’s words—written nearly 50 years ago—continue to reverberate. But to drive home the point further, it is worth reviewing a trans- lation of an analysis of Zionism published in Spanish in the November 4, 1979 edition of Granma, the official newspaper voice of the communist regime of Cuba’s Fidel Castro.

(Similar versions of this had previously appeared in the Soviet Union, at a time when there were increasing public noises against Zionism, much to the dismay of the American Trotskyites who were then reinventing themselves as “the neo-conservatives.”

While this analysis from the communist point of view has been superceded by the collapse of the Soviet empire as it existed when this document was first published, it contains fascinating insights into the sources of tension between Zionism and Communism.

The Zionist movement, created by the Jewish big bourgeoisie at the end of the 19th century, was born with a decidedly counterrevolutionary purpose. From the founding of the World Zionist Organization in 1897 to the present, Zionism, as ideology and political practice, has opposed the world revolutionary process.

Zionism is counterrevolutionary in a global sense in that it acts the world over against the three major forces of revolution: the socialist community, the working class movement in capitalist countries and the movement for national liberation.

Zionist counterrevolution began by making inroads in the European working class movement. In the early years, when the growth of monopoly capitalism and the expansion of reactionary tendencies that accompanied the establishment of the imperialist phase of capitalism demanded the unity and solidarity of the proletariat, the Zionists focused on dividing the working class.

They propagated the thesis that all non-Jews were, and would always be, anti-Semites; asserted that the only possi- bility for the Jewish masses’ well-being and justice was to emigrate to the “promised land”; and defended class collaboration, thus diverting the Jewish proletariat away from the struggle for their real emancipation and dividing and weak- ening the working class movement. It’s not fortuitous that in czarist police archives one finds documents calling for sup- port for the Zionist movement as a way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution.

Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote at the time in his diary:“All our youth; all those who are from 20 to 30 years old, will abandon their obscure socialist tendencies and come over to me.”

However, the efforts of Zionist counterrevolution could not hold back the wheels of history.The victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia ushered in a period of transition from capitalism to socialism on a world scale. The first victory of the proletariat, the premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.

Most of the money that filled Zionist coffers came from Russia, where czarism had humiliated and oppressed the Jews for centuries. Russia provided a million immigrants for the Zionist colonization of Palestine. When the Russian Revolution liquidated the exploitation of man by man, it also destroyed the basis for Zionism in the Soviet Union.

Leninist policy on the national question toppled all Zionist myths that the Jews could not be fully incorporated, with equal rights, into society and destroyed all the racist claims on the inevitability of anti-Semitism. The Zionists never did, and never will, forgive the Soviet state and its Leninist Party, not so much for cutting off the money flow from Russia and for the loss of workers for the colonization effort, but because the Bolsheviks implemented a correct policy that incorporated the talents and efforts of the Soviet Jews into the tasks of building a new society and thus demonstrated the class origins of discrimination and anti-Semitism, breaking with the past and providing a genuine solution to the Jewish problem, a solution which was not and could never be a massive exodus to Palestine.

Zionist counterrevolution took on an anti-Soviet thrust. Before October 1917 the Zionists collaborated with Kerensky. Later they supported all the attempts at counter- revolution and enthusiastically participated in the different white “governments” set up in different parts of the country during the Civil War [in Russia]. They were active in all the moves against the Soviet Union from abroad, and their powerful propaganda machine spread a spate of lies about the first workers’ and peasants’ state in the world.

Not even the Soviet victory over German fascism, which saved so many Jewish lives, made the Zionists change their anti-Soviet stand.

With the outbreak of the cold war the Zionists collaborated in all the subversive and diversionary activities against the USSR and other socialist countries. The secret services of the Zionist state of Israel coordinated their spy activities with the CIA. Zionist agents played an active role in the counter-revolutionary attempts in Hungary and Czechoslovakia.

Today Zionism seconds the hypocritical anti-Soviet campaign on presumed violations of the human rights of Jews in the Soviet Union and does all it can to put pressure on Soviet citizens of Jewish origin so they will leave their true homeland and go to Israel.This effort by Zionist counterrevolution can only lead to new failures. And to complete the picture there is the Zionist counterrevolutionary action against the national liberation movements.

Soon after World War I, Zionist settlers penetrated into Palestinian territory, acting as the spearhead of British imperialist interests in opposition to the Arab peoples’ hopes for independence. Their role was clearly spelled out by the prominent Zionist leader Max Nordau in a statement to the British authorities:

“We know what you want from us: that we defend the Suez Canal.We must defend your route to India which pass- es through the Middle East.We are ready to take on that difficult task. But you must allow us to become powerful enough to carry out that task.”

And, as a matter of fact, the Zionists became a power and succeeded in establishing their own state in 1948: the Zionist state of Israel. Now their task is to defend oil routes, protect all the interests of U.S. imperialism and block the advance of the Arab revolution.

Backed by tremendous amounts of imperialist economic and military aid, the Zionists are constantly acting against national liberation movements.

At one time it was their mission to penetrate African and Asian independence movements, guarantee that the newly independent states followed paths acceptable to imperialism, that they not stray from the confines of neocolonialism. Israel offered courses, advisers, all sorts of aid.

But the ploy wasn’t very successful. Israel’s increasing role as imperialism’s policeman in the Middle East, its racism and avowed expansionism made the young African and Asian nations see the dangers of Israeli“aid,”the treachery of Israeli foreign policy.

Nevertheless, the Zionist state took up a new role in the struggle of world reaction against progress. It went beyond the geographical confines of the Middle East, estab- lished friendly ties with all reactionary regimes and began to supply arms,equipment and advisers to those who were trying to suppress national liberation struggles.

The Israeli armaments industry specialized in designing and producing all sorts of weapons for urban and rural anti-guerrilla warfare.

The South African racist regime, the dictatorships of Guatemala and El Salvador, and the fascist Pinochet are among the best clients of the Israeli armaments industry. Israeli arms sales in 1978 were estimated at $400 million. One of their best clients was the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.

Zionist counterrevolution was present in Somoza’s Nicaragua in the form of Galil guns and Pull-push planes, but they couldn’t stop the victory of the Sandinista revolutionaries.

This is a symbol of our times: neither the machinations of Zionist counterrevolution, nor Israeli arms, can hold back the victorious march of the peoples of the world.

(END OF THE GRANMA ARTICLE)

Whatever one thinks of Fidel Castro or of former Soviet leader Josef Stalin, the fact is that there has long been a very real split between the Trotskyites—who have (in the leadership level of the “neo-conservative” network in the United States) evolved into the tribunes of the global Zionist movement—and the nationalistically-oriented elements led in Russia by Stalin following his consolidation of power.

To understand these nuances and to recognize the part they have played in shaping the events of the last half of the 20th century it is vital to understand how and why The Enemy Within has been able to manipulate the traditional cause of“anti-communism”and bend it into a mechanism for the Zionist cause.

Where there are a few insignificant Trotskyite movements—rag-tag bands of street agitators and others—who continue to operate quite independently of (and often in opposition to) the neo-conservative Zionists, it is those “neo-conservatives” who have wrapped themselves in the American flag who are the real Enemy Within.

And in light of all this, it’s no coincidence that in Russia today, both traditional Communists (many of whom revere the memory of Josef Stalin) and anti-Communists are united in their opposition to Zionism and Jewish plutocratic power.

In the chapter which follows, we will examine some remarkable historical facts which underscore the reality of the split between the Stalinists and the Zionist Trotskyites, and will further clarify the nature of the modern-day Enemy Within.

A Zionist Spy for Soviet Intelligence

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 108-109

While the late Rep. Samuel Dickstein (D-N.Y.) is remembered today as one of “the great liberals” and as one of America’s most distinguished Jewish leaders, in the late 1930s—just prior to the advent of U.S. involvement in World War II—he was best known as the first figure in Congress to promote “Nazi-hunting” and “fighting fascism” as one of America’s top priorities. Dickstein crusaded as the ultimate advocate of“Americanism.” In fact, however, he was the ultimate Judas Goat. He was an enemy agent: a spy controlled by the Soviet Union’s secret intelligence service.

Although Dickstein has been memorialized as a “statesman” and “humanitarian” and other such high-sounding tributes in the American Jewish press, other assessments of the congressman—who served 11 terms, beginning in 1923—have not been so friendly. One critic called Dickstein “a smooth infiltrator, corrupt, greedy, and utterly amoral,” an early role model for many of the Judas Goats who populate the ranks of America’s Enemy Within today.

The truth about Dickstein’s role as a Soviet agent came out in the late 1990s in long-secret Soviet intelligence messages and files that are now accessible to American historians. In fact, Stephen Gettinger, an editor of the eminently “mainstream” and thoroughly non-partisan Congressional Quarterly said that the Dickstein affair was probably“the first clear-cut case of congressional spying in history.”

Dickstein

The record shows that Dickstein—who represented a famously “Jewish” congressional district on Manhattan’s Lower East Side—was recruited as a Soviet agent in 1937 by Peter Gutzeit, a gentleman who shared Dickstein’s religion and who also happened to be the New York station chief of the NKVD, the Soviet secret police. For a fee of $1,250 a month, Dickstein stole reams of secret documents from Congress and the War Department which he turned over to his Soviet handlers.

In addition, and perhaps even more importantly, Dickstein served as Moscow’s agent of influence in Washington by loudly attacking the nationalist European powers of Germany and Italy for their resolute opposition to Soviet Communism. Dickstein was perhaps one of the loudest and earliest among those agitating for U.S. pressure on Germany, with the intention of sparking U.S. military intervention in the war in Europe that later became World War II. Dickstein made headlines by accusing Americans who refused to support his war-like intentions of being “un-American”—a charge that, even today, Zionist elements use against good patriotic Americans who refuse to support endless American intervention in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.

And while there were many who simply attributed Dickstein’s hysteria to the fact that he was Jewish, and therefore an obvious foe of Adolf Hitler’s rule in Germany, the fact is, as we have seen, that Dickstein was also a quite greedy paid agent of the Soviet Union.

And what is particularly interesting is that Dickstein was among the early promoters of the establishment of what became known as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). The New York Times even called Dickstein “the founder of HUAC.” However, when HUAC began its inquiries it soon discovered that the real subversives on American soil were Soviet agents and that many real patriots in America simply saw no need for U.S. intervention in Europe in a war against Germany, Dickstein did an about-face and denounced the very committee that he had helped establish in the first place.

It ultimately turned out that Dickstein’s financial demands on his Soviet handlers were so endless that the NKVD assigned Dickstein the code name “Crook” in their internal memoranda and intelligence traffic. By 1938, Dickstein’s New York-based conduit to the NKVD, Peter Gutzeit, was warning his superiors in a memo that “‘Crook’ is completely justifying his code name. This is an unscrupulous type, greedy for money …a very cunning swindler.”(And this assessment was hardly the kind of favorable commentary about Dickstein that was appearing in the media at the time.)

In any case, by late 1940, Dickstein and his Soviet handlers parted company, but Dickstein had already done an immense amount of quite effective dirty work on behalf of his foreign sponsors. Dickstein left Congress following the 1944 election and became a judge on the New York State Supreme Court, dying in 1954 a very wealthy and honored man.This traitor’s papers—although not the evidence of his treason— are lovingly and respectfully preserved in the American Jewish Archives at the distinguished Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati.

Obviously, Dickstein would have probably been very pro-Soviet and anti-Nazi even without the financial support of his Soviet handlers, but the fact that he was prepared to secretly lend his efforts on behalf of secret Soviet agents—for money—says quite a lot about this so-called “statesman.” In fact, Dickstein is a classic model of one of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within who have done so much damage to America. And for this, if for no other reason, we must recall his sordid record.

The truth is that there are many more like him in Congress today. The record of politicians “on the take” from the Israeli lobby iis equally sordid but these politicians brag of being on the receiving end of foreign money, whereas Dickstein, of course, kept his treason close to his vest. And that says very much about how far off course America has gone.

Trump’s presidential persona based on Alex Jones

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 22, 2018 Anno Domini

The Judeo-masonic establishment felt enough success with their controlled opposition character Alex Jones that they went and modelled a presidential puppet after him.

That must be quite the honour for the Zionist-created Likudnik cartoon character Alex Jones, who couldn’t contain his glee when Trump was elected President of the United States of America in 2017—something which Jones helped make happen, due to his unwavering support for a presidential candidate. Up until then, he had never in his public life endorsed a presidential candidate. During a live broadcast of Infowars on election night, Jones looked like a giddy school girl when it was announced that Trump had won. For once, Jones showed us that night his real emotions.

True, Alex Jones is not as big (figuratively) as he once was, despite his followers’ relentless boasting of his Youtube subscription numbers. But the intelligence-manufactured model for his persona continues to be a success, as it has thwarted any real progression of dissident paleo-conservatives (truthers, patriots, constitutionalists, etc.)—thwarted them coming together and causing real change in the world by way of siphoning off their pent up rage and frustration and prematurely ejaculating it in a place where its seed is squandered among barren swine and mindless boobs. There has been no fertile land upon which the truther movement has been able to plant and successfully nurture seeds of truth to maturity, other than in the ever-shrinking traditional Church communities (Catholic and Orthodox alike). Since 1996, the counter-intelligence operative Alex Jones has hindered and suppressed any meaningful resistance to the New World Order conspiracy. That has been his primary function. If you haven’t figured this much out by now, there is no point in reading on. Click away now and meander over to any one of the establishment-controlled websites: Breitbart, Zerohedge, or even Infowars.

Moving on. Trump’s appearance on the Alex Jones show during his election run was a symbolic passing of the torch, if you will, of the continuation of the psychological warfare assault on the American people and the world. Now instead of an over-the-top, loud-mouthed radio host cathartically transmuting our energy and telling us everything we want to hear, the President will assume the role. But this time, we will think we have finally changed things and bucked the system—something Alex Jones failed to do, no matter how many times he repeated to his parrots that “we are defeating the New World Order” or that “the empire is on the run.”

It’s no coincidence that Alex Jones is tied to the same Jewish-Russian organized crime syndicate that Trump is. It’s also no coincidence that Trump and Jones share virtually all of the same political views. So it is that Jones has worked in tandem with the supposedly anti-establishment Trump-Roger Stone-Netanyahu dirty trickstering, Likudnik tag team. (By the way, it turns out that Roger Stone—that pathetic, buggering swinger—is directly tied to the Jewish-Russian Meyer Lansky organized crime syndicate. More on that in my upcoming fourth part of my series on Trump and the Mossad.) One wonders if the Alex Jones operation dually has served as a proving grounds for a future president. Even in Nixon’s days, Roger Stone was working behind the scenes preparing for a fake populist president who would come into power under the guise of being anti-establishment. Ronald Reagan was a step in that direction but didn’t quite meet the establishment expectations for a controlled opposition puppet. Trump sure has, though, hasn’t he? Look how many people on the Right he has fooled. Nearly all of them. And look how many of those he has fooled who once also followed Alex Jones but later abandoned him after realizing he was a fraud. They broke free from one tier of deception but then immersed themselves in another tier when they bought that Trump was the real deal. They don’t see the dialectic at work in their overly simplistic analysis of the world conspiracy.

If the Trump persona truly is based on the Alex Jones persona, perhaps we can make a prediction of where Trump’s presidency will go. Right now, Alex Jones, as a character, appears to be on the decline. The truly awakened individuals that once followed him are long gone and now all he has left are mindless “red-pilled” idiots, of mostly millennial, hillbilly, and pothead extraction. His out-of-control behaviour is, perhaps, doing the most damage to his status and reputation. The publicity of his custody-trial with ex-wife Violet revealed a lot about the artificiality of his public character. He is currently married to what appears to be a former hooker. His strange relationship with Hollywood sleaze Charlie Sheen went public a few years ago, and now his former employers are bringing to light even more darker truths of the Alex Jones character. In essence, he is self-destructing. Could Donald Trump follow a similar path? Many think he already is. Both Jones and Trump share the pathology of narcissism, which makes them their own worst enemies—and at the complete mercy of their handlers.

Putin Dossier

Exposing Russian president Vladimir Putin and his crypto-Soviet state for the Judeo-masonic, Chabad mafiya collaborators that they are.

Check regularly for updates.

Putin: ‘A rejection of anti-Semitism and all forms of xenophobia and international enmity is what brings Russia and Israel together’

Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn: The Key to Understanding Today’s World Situation

Israeli PM Netanyahu and Russian President Putin at Jewish Museum in Moscow

Why Israel allows Russia to ‘protect’ Assad

Russia controls Reddit’s political and conspiracy narratives on Trump and Clinton

The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration and Manipulation

The Perestroika Deception: Russia’s fake democratization, according to Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn (PDF)

We will soon achieve COMMUNISM! – Putin

Jewish roots of Russian president Vladimir Putin

The Perestroika Deception according to Christopher Story: Russia is false opposition to the NWO

Communism Alive and Menacing, KGB Defector Claims

Russia prevents Iran from setting up base in Syria, Israel welcomes the move

‘Putin is recreating the Soviet Union as he thinks it should have been,’ says Natan Sharansky’s former Hebrew teacher, ‘without the anti-Semitism’

InfoWars’ Alex Jones Stole Over 1,000 Articles From Kremlin-Backed Russia Today

Jewish-Russian oligarch and GOP donor Len Blavatnik is a Chabadnik

GOP campaigns took $7.35 million from Jewish oligarch linked to Russia

Judeo-Islamic alliance: Putin says Moscow’s new mosque is the largest in Europe

Series:

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part I

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part II

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part III

Putin’s Jewish embrace: Is it love or politics?

Technocracy: Run by Israel, Russia, China (Operation TALPIOT)

Bilderberg 2018 In Italy – More Russian Connections Than Trump

Putin Grants Netanyahu Schindler’s Letter During Meeting in Moscow

Holocaust Deniers in Russia Now Face Five Years in Prison

Putin’s initiative: Russia outlaws distorted, anti-Semitic interpretation of the Bible

Netanyahu to fly to Moscow on Monday for snap meeting with Putin

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill Praises Dead Communist, Atheist Dictator

Russia-linked Twitter accounts are working overtime to help Devin Nunes and WikiLeaks

The Chaos Computer Club’s Past Links to the KGB and Present Links to WikiLeaks, Assange, and Snowden

Putin Welcomes Kissinger: ‘Old Friends’ to Talk Shop

Russia Hires Goldman Sachs as Corporate Broker to Boost Image

Goldman Sachs | Russia

How Russia Created a Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center Even Vladimir Putin Can Tolerate | ‘Putin was so moved by this idea that he donated one month of his salary toward the creation of the museum’

The Happy-Go-Lucky Jewish Group That Connects Trump and Putin

At Putin’s side, an army of Jewish billionaires

Israel’s former Soviet immigrants transform adopted country

Israel and Russia are NOT on the verge of war. They are allies!

Does anyone still seriously think that Russia and Israel aren’t allies | Israel’s latest bombing raid on Syria is confirmation that the Putin-Netanyahu Summit in Sochi was a lot more successful than some Alt-Media voices have led people to believe

How Putin’s Man Made His Way to the Top of European Jewry

 

Screen capture from Oliver Stone’s 2017 series The Putin Interviews where Putin plays his true Jewish card of ridiculing anti-Jews.

Russia to invest billions of dollars in Saudi Arabia’s future megacity

Russia, Iraq: Rosneft Pays Kurdistan $1.3 Billion Advance

Rosneft Expands in Middle East With Libya and Iraq Oil Deals

Russia and IMF agree on new economic plan (like Lenin’s NEP!)

Russia: Ukraine should seek bailout loan from IMF

The IMF Bows to Putin in Ukraine

The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a member of Rothschilds’ Bank for International Settlements

As Putin Becomes One of World’s Most Powerful Players, His Surprising Jewish Connection is Revealed

9/11 conspiracy complicity:

“Claims that the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 were orchestrated by US intelligence agencies are “complete nonsense,” Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told attendees of a youth forum”

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said his country warned the United States several times that Saddam Hussein’s regime was planning terror attacks on the United States and its overseas interests”

“Putin, who had been the first to call Bush with his sympathy after learning of the 9/11 attacks, graciously offered to help with the invasion of Afghanistan”

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s political party, “Yadinaya Rasiya” (United Russia), will open a branch in Israel, marking the first time ever that a Russian party will have an official mission in the country

Putin: ‘I support the struggle of Israel’

Russian Missile Sale to Iran Involves Unseen Deals With Israel

Putin’s Double Game in Syria: Russian-Israeli Cooperation

Why Russia should take over Israel’s defense from America

Putin gives Jewish War book to Netanyahu as a present

Putin’s Favorite Rabbi

Senior Russian Rabbi Says Putin’s Ouster Would Endanger Jews

The American Jews Who Are Proud to Be Pro-Putin

Putin on our side, says Russia’s chief rabbi | Russian chief rabbi Berel Lazar tells Limmud FSU that Putin has done more for Jews than any other leader of the country

Meeting with Chief Rabbi of Russia Berel Lazar and President of the Federation of Jewish Communities Alexander Boroda

Technocracy/Smart Grid/Operation TALPIOT:

 Operation Talpiot – Key to Understanding Israeli Power 

Artificial intelligence is not only the future of Russia, but the future of all mankind. It holds both tremendous opportunities and is fraught with scarcely predictable dangers. Whoever takes the lead in this sphere will become Lord of the World,” President Putin told Russian schoolchildren

Russian spy claims he was poisoned just like Sergei Skripal as Vladimir Putin wants him dead

Photographic Proof the USSR Still Exists

Russia’s Pre-World War III Propaganda: Not for the Fainthearted

Jerome Corsi & the alt-right’s Russian hackers

Putin: Just another Jewish oligarch

Jewish puppet Putin

Putin, Oligarchy and Alt-Media Delusion

Putin: I’ve always liked communist and socialist ideals

Russia, China, India Call for NEW WORLD ORDER!

The Unsolved Mystery Behind the Act of Terror That Brought Putin to Power

Chechen Terrorism: Made in Moscow

Boston Bombing: Latest Globalist Pretext for U.S.-Russia Convergence

Putin, Poison, and Murder

Brendon O’Connell – Syria, Russia & Iran are Not the “Good Guys”

The Putin-Netanyahu bromance

The 9 Russian Words That Explain KremlinGate

Putin not remotely anti-Semitic, says Russia’s chief rabbi

Israel’s former Soviet immigrants transform adopted country

How Russia’s rich elite spend their billions in London

Russian-Chinese Military Blackmail: Accept Communism or Face World War III

Israel dumping the U.S. for Russia (did it ever really break up with Russia in the first place?)

Russian President Vladimir Putin (C) listens to Russia’s Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar (L) during his visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Centre in Moscow February 19, 2013. (photo credit: SPUTNIK PHOTO AGENCY / REUTERS)

Russia’s kosher kingpin launches halal meat empire

Remnant ROCOR: Russia did not abandon communism

Communist Paper Questions Putin’s Orthodoxy

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

A Zionist Spy for Soviet Intelligence

Facebook was using Kaspersky Lab until last year to scan people’s computers – Russia reportedly exploited Kaspersky’s antivirus software to trawl US government systems for classified data

The Kremlin turns priests into obedient “comrades”

Russia’s Communist-sponsored newspaper Pravda endorses hoax theory of Boston bombing, but why? Was Russia behind the theory itself?

Russia is arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, US General says

Syria is a Communist/Soviet satellite

Facebook gave data about 57 billion friendships to Russian-Jewish academic

The Oliver North of RussiaGate

Oleg the Oligarch

Confirmed: Russian Patriarch Worked with KGB

Jacob Rothschild brokers historic deal between Russia and Israel to share digitised Gunzburg Collection

The KGB “Fake News” Narrative & Hypocrisy of the Alt-Right & Libertarian Media

Putin Visits Former KGB Boss

Reditt: A deep dive into content posted by 944 accounts run out of Russia’s IRA

Julian Assange Confirmed as Kremlin Stooge

Trump’s direct ties to Jewish-Russian mob revealed

Three-part Dutch series focusing on Jewish Chabad Lubavitch mobster Felix Sater (Trump’s Bayrock partner), “King of Diamonds” Lev Leviev, and other Jewish-Russian mobsters like Semion Mogilevich and Alex Sapir.

Media anti-Catholic narratives with an endless shelf life

A refutation of Michael Hoffman II

By Jude Duffy
June 29, 2017 Anno Domini

Michael Hoffman II says my comments about him posted on an article published on Henry Makow’s site are calculated to harm his “reputation as a historian”. This is provably false. Far from being “calculated”, my comments were originally a private reply to a woman who wrote to Henry taking issue with my passing reference, in another Makow piece, to Mr. Hoffman as anti-Catholic. This woman challenged me to substantiate my description of Mr. Hoffman and I did so. Henry asked me if he could publish this private reply on his site, and I agreed. So, no calculation.

However, since Mr Hoffman raises the subject, if he wishes to rebut slurs, real or imagined, on his historiographical credibility, no one is stopping him presenting all his formal academic qualifications in this discipline.

Incidentally, my original passing comment about Hoffman (and other alternative media types such as David Icke) alluded to their penchant for uncritically recycling any and all negative narratives the corporate media serve up about the Catholic Church—even though they urge their followers to treat the same media’s narratives about most other issues with contempt. Hoffman in his counter-attack has made no effort to refute this criticism.

Nor has he addressed my point about why he condones the media’s unrelenting efforts to portray clerical sexual abuse of minors as a uniquely Catholic crime. This co-ordinated hate campaign is one of the great media scandals of our time (as some Protestants and even some atheists have acknowledged), yet Hoffman promotes it very enthusiastically in his writings.

Only a few days ago, an item appeared on British Sky News relating to Peter Ball—former Anglican bishop and close friend of the heir to the British throne, Prince Charles—who has been convicted of multiple counts of sexual abuse of minors. The report stated that the former head of the Church of England, Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey, had been ordered by the current Archbishop of Canterbuy, Justin Welby, to cut all formal ties with the Church of England, because of his role in covering up the crimes of Bishop Ball.

In addition to being the former head of the worldwide Anglican Communion, Carey sits in the British House of Lords and is still a prominent figure in British public life, so this was by any standards a huge story. If it had related to a former Catholic bishop found guilty of sexual abuse, and a former head of the Catholic Church in England found to have covered up his crimes, it would have made front-page news, not just in the U.K. but also around the world. The ultra-Zionist New York Times would have devoted endless column inches to it, and the usual oligarch-funded and directed cultural Marxist groups would have staged noisy protests outside Westminster Catholic Cathedral.

Even the self-styled traditionalist Catholic movement would have jumped on the bandwagon, showering the corporate media with sycophantic garlands for “exposing the sickening corruption at the heart of the post-conciliar Church”.

Yet not only was this story not the main headline on Sky News, it didn’t even merit its own report from a religious affairs or legal affairs correspondent.

Furthermore, Sky News chose to downplay Peter Ball’s crimes by referring to them as the ‘abuse of young men’, when the victims were in fact teenage boys. Over 80 per cent of the victims of Catholic clerics convicted of sexual abuse were in the same age range as Ball’s victims (or the ones he has been convicted of – he has also been accused of abusing younger children). Yet the media invariably refer to Catholic clerical abuse of teenagers as ‘paedophilia’, ‘child abuse’, or the ‘rape of children’.

Needless to say, and regardless of the culprit, there can be no question of minimising the horror of the crime of homosexual abuse of teenagers, but the anti-Catholic vendetta of the media is discernible even in the different language corporate presstitutes use to describe equivalent crimes—depending on the religious denomination of the perpetrator.

Underscoring this vendetta, the Daily Mail, a vile pornographic propaganda organ of the British-Masonic establishment, in its report on the Ball scandal, repeatedly referred to Bishop Ball as a ‘priest’, a term that in Britain usually denotes members of the Catholic clergy.

Mr. Hoffman of course never has anything to say about this whitewashing of the crimes of Protestant clergy, because, quite demonstrably, he shares the Zionist media’s hatred of the Catholic Church.

He repeatedly insists it is only the post-Renaissance Church he objects to, but unless he is exceedingly dense, he must know that the Catholic Church has never held that her divinely guaranteed indefectibility would run out after a given period of history—quite the reverse. If the Church is not indefectible now, she has never been indefectible. And if she had never been indefectible, she would have been as much a fraud in the Middle Ages as she is now—according to Mr. Hoffman’s logic. He really must choose.

 

Moreover, Mr. Hoffman once again refuses to answer the crucial question as to what religious authority he deems worthy of obedience in the here and now. Does he believe that in today’s world every Christian must decide for himself on the great moral issues of our time? That is the definition of Protestantism—and liberalism

Hoffman challenges me to substantiate my claim that he admires Cromwell. This is extraordinary. In his writings he has repeatedly sought to downplay the Judaizing tendencies of Cromwell and the Puritans. Indeed, to read much of what he writes on this subject, one could be forgiven for assuming that the Jacobites had triumphed in the religious and political conflicts of 17th century Britain (see for example one of his most recent pieces on this subject ‘The Great Divide’ – May 2. 2017).

One doesn’t have to be a fan of the Stuarts (I’m not) to recognise the utter absurdity of placing the blame for Britain’s emergence as a usurious capitalist superpower on that dynasty—akin to blaming the Romanovs for the ills of the Soviet Union. Quite simply, Catholics were a defeated and persecuted minority in the days when usurious capitalism became the dominant economic system throughout the U.K. and its colonies.

If British Protestants had the aversion to usury that Hoffman attributes to them, they had ample opportunity to combat this vice from a position of enormous strength, as they held uncontested power in Britain and its possessions  throughout the late 17th century, the 18th century, and the 19th century. As it was, usurious capitalism went from strength to strength in the era of Protestant hegemony.

The United Kingdom has never had a Catholic Prime Minister and hasn’t had a Catholic monarch since the days of the Stuarts. The United States only got its first Catholic President in 1960, and he was only deemed a worthy candidate when he promised not to let his faith govern his political decisions.

And he got shot.

The incontestable fact is that Protestants were ‘early adopters’ of usurious capitalism. Many of the founders of the Bank of England were Huguenots—as was its first governor Sir John Houblon. Even in the predominantly Catholic countries of France and Italy, Protestants dominated usurious banking—something their religious descendants still acknowledge today.

The same applies, incidentally, to Freemasonry. Hoffman dismisses the many papal condemnations of Freemasonry as a smokescreen to hide the real agenda of the “Romanists”, just as he dismisses papal condemnations of usury. On the other hand, he ignores the indisputable and very concrete links between the Protestant churches and Masonry, e.g., Anglican and Lutheran archbishops’ and bishops’ membership of the Freemasons.

So, in Hoffman’s bizarre counter-intuitive form of historiography, binding papal encyclicals can be dismissed as charades, whereas irrefutable evidence of Masonic domination of Protestant churches is deemed irrelevant in assessing the merits of these denominations.

Hoffman doesn’t appear to worry unduly either about Calvin’s openly stated support for usury, Luther’s admiration for occult alchemy, his proto-modernist attempts to edit the Bible to his own taste, and his exhortation to his followers to “sin boldly”.

Nor does Hoffman get around to explaining why, if the radical Protestants of past centuries were such upstanding folk, most mainline Protestant churches now support abortion, homosexuality, and why even most of the more conservative Protestant denominations endorse birth prevention and promote Israel First ultra-Zionism.

He largely ignores, too, the Protestant Anglo-Israelist origins of corrupt occult societies such as the Orange Order, Purple Arch, the Black Preceptory, Skull and Bones, and Scroll and Key—most of which flourished in the radical Protestant heartlands of northern Ireland, Scotland, New England, and the British colonies. Instead, he focuses all his moral outrage about the degeneracy of modern institutional Christianity on the Catholic Church.

For someone who takes such offence at criticism of his own stated views, Hoffman falsely attributes statements to his critics with reckless abandon. He says I claimed that usury “began” with Protestants. I would never say anything so absurd. Usury didn’t begin with Protestants or “Romanists”; it has always existed. I did say that Hoffman has attempted to whitewash Protestantism’s role in the rise of usury, and he has made no attempt to refute this charge.

Hoffman calls my speculation about the reasons for his admiration for Luther, Calvin, et al., “Freudian drivel”. Actually if I had to write the piece again, I’d leave out the last bit about Hoffman’s possible motives for lionising Protestant leaders and Puritans—not because it’s in any way far-fetched to speculate that he may have fallen prey to romantic hero-worship—a much more plausible hypothesis than his own outlandish claim that the popes were secretly promoting Freemasonry while pretending to condemn it. No, the reason I’d omit this final paragraph is because, with hindsight, I think it gives Hoffman too much credit, and may falsely imply a nuanced outlook on his part about religious matters, where no such nuance or balance exists. Regardless of his motives, of which I obviously have no certain knowledge, Hoffman’s writings about the Church are quite simply the work of a crude anti-Catholic propagandist.

Incidentally, the only reason I even added the last bit is because Henry Makow, being a magnanimous sort of chap, asked me if I’d care to balance my criticisms of Hoffman with something positive. That was the context in which I wrote what I did about Hoffman’s piece on Bing Crosby and Irving Berlin. However his views on the Old Crooner notwithstanding, Hoffman’s anti-Catholic bigotry is beyond reasonable dispute in my view.

Infowars studio location revealed

infowars-studio-location
By Timothy Fitzpatrick

February 12, 2017 Anno Domini

The alleged secret location of Alex Jones’ Infowars studio is in an industrial park in southeast Austin, Texas.

Pete Santilli approaches the Infowars studio, which is deceptively labelled as "Oak Shipping".

Pete Santilli approaches the Infowars studio, which is deceptively labelled as “Oak Shipping”, in 2014.

Jones broadcasts his Likud-controlled counter-intelligence propaganda show from a unit(s) at 3019 Alvin Devane Boulevard with a misleading facade on the front door labelled “Oak Shipping” (this fake name and logo may have changed recently). The unit number is supposedly 300-350; however, Google maps shows the wrong location of the unit. The raid by Pete Santilli on the Infowars studio back in 2014 shows that the main unit is in the northern section of the complex (where I have put the Infowars logo in the Google map capture above).

The unit is surrounded by technology, technical, and finance companies, some or all of which may well be CIA front companies, as Jones’ operation is connected to the CIA itself (they like to keep their front companies together so they can protect each other). To the east of Jones’ unit is the State of Texas Division for Disability Determination Services and to the north is Republican Ken Paxton’s State of Texas Attorney General’s Office, which is Republican. Some of the names of the other complex occupants include U.S. government-linked and Israeli companies like: Negevetch Ltd.; Nano-Master; Universal Leasing and Trading, LP; Pinnacle Peak Holding Corp.; Metaphor Technology Farm; Open Roads Consulting, Inc.; Secular Growth Investments, LLC; and Ixrf Systems, Inc.

Jones still appears to be using the same series of shell companies, as previously reported on this blog, to obscure his operation and its personnel. The shells have likely been cleverly configured by his Bronfman-connected lawyer Elizabeth L. Morgan (formerly: Schurig). Incedentally, the Bronfmans became masters at tax avoidance, running their criminal enterprises through a complex series of companies, foundations, trusts, and others.

One of my readers has pointed out that Jones’ studio move to this Alvin Devane location was preceded by one of his “money bomb” campaigns, in which Jones manipulates his gullible supporters by pleading for money under the pretext that it is necessary in order to continue with his “operation”.