Jews abandon ‘Islamophobia’, embrace Islam as proxy against Christ, again

sledge-(R)

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile…. And now, Europe is losing its identity in favour of another people and another religion…. Even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity.” —Rabbi Baruch Efrati, 2012

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
September 3, 2016 Anno Domini

The Zionist usefulness of so called “Islamophobia” has reached an end as the Judeo-masonic cryptocracy advances to the next level of achieving its kabbalist, alchemical olam ha ba (world to come).

The Zionist neocon regime of the George W. Bush/Tony Blair era has more or less achieved its goal of Balkanizing the Middle East, stealing its oil, and expanding Israel’s control and influence over the region. The only thing that remains unfinished is the toppling of a couple of more resistance regimes, namely Syria and Iran.

As the Jewtocracy initially escalated its efforts to achieve this goal of Middle East dominance, it apparently used the tool of “Islamophobia” (a left-wing invented meme) to aid in its public relations goal of selling war (and a surrendering of civil liberties) to the Western public. It worked. The general public, especially self-identifying conservatives, supported the war efforts (Afghanistan, Iraq). But now that we appear to be moving into the next phase of Jewish global hegemony, what purpose does this Islamophobia serve?

There are only two legitimate reasons for neocon-era Jews to promote Islamophobia:

  1. To create global hostility towards Islamics in order for Israel to justifiably Judaize and control the Middle East (whilst acquiring its resources).
  2. To cover up Israel Mossad/CIA false flag terrorism (to achieve geo-political objectives and to make future false flags more tenable).

As I have already stated, the first objective has already been achieved. The second objective is ongoing but takes a back seat to greater objectives, which I will get to shortly.

Anti-Zionists, from the right and the left, appear to agree that Islamophobia is a Zionist tool. However, some right-wing anti-Zionists have never bought into that theory and have opposed both Islam and Judaism as hostile ethnic movements (this is the most truthful view). But for the most part, anti-Zionists in general are still using the Islamophobia meme, even though they can’t justify its continued use by Zionists (Mark Glenn is a good example). The most they can do to justify its continued use is to pick and choose which incident of “terrorism” is a false-flag attack—some even contending that all acts of terrorism are false flags.

Jews-Dominate-Media-5
Out with the Jewish Necons, in with Soros and the SJW Jewish left

The evidence indicates that the Judeo-masonic crpytocracy has manipulated the immigration policies of the West, the media, the police forces, and Western leaders to allow for the unfettered influx of hostile, violent, and brute migrants from Islamic nations, especially North Africa. There is no other reasonable explanation for the seeming organized collaborative effort of said groups. If true, wouldn’t it be contradictory for these Zionists to support the movement of large numbers of Muslims to the West whilst spreading fear of this movement in the minds of Westerners?

Further evidence that Jews have abandoned Islamphobia is media censorship/downplaying of Islamic crimes (thanks in part to Jewish-engineered “social justice” activism and dominance of the press) and identifying Islamists at the centre of these crimes. If it were their agenda, the Jewish-controlled media would be doing the opposite. They would amplify the Islamic role in the escalating crimes in Europe and the West. They would go out of their way to identify and make known that these crimes were the works of extreme Islamists, like they did during the Bush/Blair neocon era. The overall media bias of the neocon days is strikingly different from that of today’s. I don’t see any pro-Islamic anti-Zionists pointing this out. Then we have radical leftist Jew George Soros hyping the alleged problem of “Islamophobia” through his open society thinktank Demos. One leaked Soros open society document, “International Migration Initiative“, states,

…we aimed to prevent the violation of migrants’ rights by minimizing harsh border controls and decreasing the widespread use of detention and deportation.

…we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration.

We deliberately avoided the term “global governance” because there is no single system at the global level for managing migration.

Although the Soros think-tank talks of ways to undermine governments in order to advance unfettered migration, much of the work was done decades ago as Jews advanced to and influenced Western immigration policy boards and committees.

jewishleadersislamizationofeurope

Christianity the primary target of Jewish/Islamic alliance

The reason Jews have abandoned Islamophobia globally, albeit perhaps not locally in the Middle East, is for their primary objective of destroying Christianity and all its vestiges. Jewish rabbis and handfuls of others have admitted this is their goal in the Islamization of the West. Judaism itself was created in reaction to Christianity, that is, as a proposed solution to Christianity. Islam serves as perhaps the greatest proxy weapon the Jewish conspirators have ever been able to employ in their hatred for Christ and the moral order. As anyone with eyes can see, this agenda has been fully engaged. The Jews don’t just want the Oded Yinon plan, they want the entire world, and there is only enough from for the Jews in the new world. Christianity must be eradicated. West Bank Rabbi Baruch Efrati, in an astonishing admission in the Jewish press, said that the “Islamization of Europe a good thing” and that “Islam a relatively honest religion”.

We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly… Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…

A now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.

Islam: Useful idiots or co-conspirators?

vehapar

Orthodox Armenia—a victim of Jewish/Islamic terrorism.

Jews have helped and used their perceived enemies before, whether it was the Nazis, Hamas, Wahhabism, and especially Al Qaeda/ISIS/ISIL. It also wouldn’t be the first time that Jews used Islam against Christianity, as historian E. Michael Jones points out about Medieval anti-Christianity in The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History. In a more recent example, evidence tends to show a Jewish-Islamic alliance in the Armenian genocide (Armenia is an Oriental Orthodox Christian society). In the 7th century A.D. Jews allied themselves with the Persian Sasanians in a failed attempt to overthrow the Christian Orthodox Byzantine Empire. As the above Youtube video of Rabbi Pinchas Goldscmidt illustrates, the long-running Jewish-Islamic alliance remains, despite appearances to the contrary. The Jewish-Islamic alliance is much more than Jews identifying with Muslims out of sympathy for their minority status (a sympathy Jews had for black Americans in their alliance during the civil rights buildup) in the West. They see a great opportunity in finally wiping out Christianity and any memory of Hellenic Christian morality from the face of the Earth, whether that be through the annihilation of Christianity and Islam together, or all religions simultaneously (Albert Pike’s prediction).

And where they can, Jews will continue to use false-flag terrorism, mainly through Islamic patsies (both willing and unwilling), to further their goal of destabilizing the Middle East and the West. Israel think-tank director Efraim Inbar wrote in an August 2 paper “The Destruction of Islamic State is a Strategic Mistake” that “instability and crises sometimes contain portents of positive change.” The paper went on to illustrate how ISIS was a useful tool against Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah.

Former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky revealed in his 1994 tell-all book The Other Side of Deception that the Mossad creates and controls Islamic extremist groups.

Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel, again, as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.

—page 197

Jewish flip-flopping over perceived enemies part of the kabbalist game

If all this Jewish about facing is confusing, it’s because it’s designed to appear that way to the unaware. The goal is to guide and control the bewildered through a series of complex dialectics (literally to rule using opposites). Islam may be the enemy of Jews one day, and allies the following day—the process of which attracts proponents to either side of the orchestrated conflict, which usually serves to either bring said proponents to another tier(s) of dialectics or to some conclusive end. These staged conflicts can lead to dozens other tiers of conflicts, with a goal not realized for several generations, as is the case with the Judeo-masonic conspiracy. You have have heard of this deception termed the “Hegelian dialectic”, but its true source is the Jewish Kabbalah. The entire New World Order conspiracy, in all of its facets, is based on this Jewish alchemical concept. The Kabbalah basically teaches that one can achieve “good” using evil, of all sorts and degrees.

Mossad Exposed in Phony ‘Palestinian Al-Qaeda’ Caper

Screen shot 2015-09-02 at 7.43.24 PM

(Editor’s note: Publishing of this article is not an endorsement of Lyndon LaRouche or his affiliates.)

By Michele Steinberg and Hussein Askary
December 20, 2002 Anno Domini
Executive Intelligence Review

The United States government has been provided with con- crete evidence that the Israeli Mossad and other Israeli intelligence services have been involved in a 13-month effort to “recruit” an Israeli-run, phony “al-Qaeda cell” among Palestinians, so that Israel could achieve a frontline position in the U.S. war against terrorism and get a green light for a worldwide “revenge without borders” policy. The question: Does the United States have the moral fiber to investigate?

Evidence of the Israeli dirty tricks burst onto the public scene on Dec. 6, when Col. Rashid Abu Shbak, head of the Palestinian Preventive Security Services in the Gaza Strip, held a press conference revealing the details of the alleged plot, as his agency had put the pieces together. The revelations undermine the “big lie” that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has used to justify new brutal attacks on Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip and other occupied areas. Sharon claimed on Dec. 4 that Israeli intelligence had “hard evidence” of al-Qaeda operations in the Gaza Strip. Now, the top Palestinian leadership has shown the United States and other nations how Israeli intelligence entities were creating that al-Qaeda link!

American leader Lyndon LaRouche, a Democratic Presidential pre-candidate in 2004, commented that these revelations, if confirmed, could be “of strategic importance” in stop- ping the American, British, and Israeli warhawks pushing for a Middle East war, beginning with an invasion of Iraq. A war would justify the Sharon government’s plan to annihilate the very idea of a Palestinian state. LaRouche warned that if institutions of the American Presidency and the international community successfully block an American pre-emptive war on Iraq, the biggest danger would be that a “mega-terror” attack, blamed on Palestinians, or an “Iraqi-linked” al-Qaeda, would be staged by Israel’s ruling Jabotinskyite fanatics, to put the war back on the agenda.

News about the Mossad-run attempt to create an al-Qaeda cell came when well-informed intelligence sources based in Washington had already told EIR that there are many doubts about the Mossad’s hasty declaration that “al-Qaeda” had been responsible for the Nov. 28 attack on a hotel in Mombasa, Kenya, where three Israelis were killed, and the failed rocket attack on an Israeli chartered jet that was departing from Mombasa airport. There was no identification of the bombers within the first five days of the incident, the sources pointed out, yet Sharon’s government ministers went on an immediate propaganda rampage announcing worldwide revenge (see article in this section). Authorities in Kenya also denied the al-Qaeda link. But the usefulness of blaming al- Qaeda, for the Israeli right, was palpable, when Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the Kenya attacks “a golden opportunity” to prove to the United States that Bush’s war on terrorism, and Israel’s war with the Palestinians is the same thing. Netanyahu’s faction has violently rejected the Palestinian Authority’s revelations, and so far, the American and European press have followed suit, despite the dramatic nature of these charges, and the documents that the Palestinians have provided to the international press.

Chronology of the Revelations
On Dec. 7, the British news service, Reuters, the Israeli daily Ha’aretz, and Qatar-based Al-Jazeera TV network, all reported that the Palestinian Authority had accused the Mos- sad of creating a phony al-Qaeda cell in the Gaza Strip. Ha’aretz reported, “the head of Palestinian Preventive Security” in the Gaza Strip, Col. Rashid Abu Shbak, said on Dec. 6, “that his forces had identified a number of Palestinian collaborators who had been ordered by Israeli security agencies to ‘work in the Gaza Strip under the name of al-Qaeda.’ He said the investigation was ongoing and evidence would be presented soon.” Al-Jazeera TV added that the Palestinian authorities had arrested a group of Palestinian “collaborators with Israeli occupation” in Gaza, involved in the operation.

Reuters’ reporter Diala Saadeh, under the headline, “Palestinians: Israel Faked Gaza al-Qaeda Presence,” quoted a number of Palestinian Authority (P.A.) senior officials, including President Yasser Arafat, who told reporters at his West Bank Ramallah headquarters, that Sharon’s claims of al-Qaeda operations in Palestinian territories “is a big, big, big lie to cover [Sharon’s] attacks and his crimes against our people everywhere.” P.A. Information Minister Yasser Abed Rabbo detailed the case: “There are certain elements who were instructed by the Mossad to form a cell under the name of al-Qaeda in the Gaza Strip in order to justify the assault and the military campaigns of the Israeli occupation army against Gaza.”

Palestinian officials promised to provide detailed evidence, and did so on Dec. 8, in a press conference addressed by Colonel Shbak, and by Palestinian Minister for Planning and International Cooperation Nabil Shaath. Shbak told the international representatives that,“Over the past nine months, we’ve been investigating eight cases in which Israeli intelligence posing as al-Qaeda operatives recruited Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.” Colonel Shbak said that 3 men were under arrest, and 11 had been released. He explained that those released had voluntarily provided information going back to May 2002, about the contacts that had been made asking them to operate as an “al-Qaeda” group. The alleged al-Qaeda recruiters were traced to Israeli intelligence, said Colonel Shbak. He detailed incidents, some of which were described in official documents, of cell phone calls and e-mails, where Palestinians were asked to “join al-Qaeda.” Shbak said, “We investigated the origin of those calls, which used [wireless phone] roaming, and messages, and found out they all came from Israel,” reported the publication, IslamOnline. He said that the potential “recruits,” had been given money and weapons, “although most of these weapons did not even work.” He also noted that the money for these targeted Palestinians “was transferred from bank accounts in Jerusalem or Israel.”

Minister Shaath announced at the press conference that the P.A. had “handed ambassadors and consuls of the Arab and foreign countries, documents revealing the involvement of the Israeli intelligence in recruiting citizens from Gaza Strip in a fake organization carrying the name of Qaeda.” He said the ploy was intended “to create a new excuse to escalate the aggression on Gaza Strip.”

The international community was jolted again on Dec. 10, when Colonel Shbak held another press conference and the Preventive Security Agency presented the Mossad’s potential recruiter himself to the international media. According to re- ports in the Arabic press in Dubai, London and Ramallah, the man appeared in disguise (for security reasons,) and was identified only as “Ibrahim,” but explained in great detail that he was one of the “key recruiters” for the potential cell. He said the story started in October 2001, when, after he sent his photo and mobile phone number to a “contact page” in a Jerusalem magazine, he was contacted by a person calling himself “Youssef,” and nicknamed “Abu Othman.” After building up a personal relationship with “Ibrahim,” and telling him how much he resembled his own son, who had been killed, Youssef sent him $2,000, and began encouraging the Gaza man—who appeared to be in his early 20s—to become a more observant and practicing Muslim.

In May 2002, five months after the initial contact, said Ibrahim, Youssef “told me frankly, ‘you are a good candidate to work for us in the company of Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda group.’ ” This Youssef also claimed to have already created an al-Qaeda cell inside Israel. Ibrahim said that he then approached the Palestinian security services and told them about the transactions with Youssef, and that the security services asked him to continue the communications, which they would monitor. He said that the specific instructions were that Ibrahim was to announce through a communique ́—directly from Gaza—that al-Qaeda claimed credit for a bombing attack, or attacks, that Youssef indicated his network was about to carry out in Israel. Ibrahim stressed that the man also said that he (the Mossad officer) “had the capability to carry out major bombing operations inside Israel, but that the al-Qaeda group in Gaza should claim responsibility for the attack and no other group.” In an interview with the London- based Arabic daily Al-Hayat, after the press conference, Ibrahim stated, that “the man told him that mega military operations will be conducted inside Israel, and that these operations would be announced through Ibrahim.” This would mean that as soon as he gets the signal after a major terrorist act against Israeli civilian targets, Ibrahim and his group would send a communique ́ to the press or a videotape, similar to the ones sent by bin Laden to Al-Jazeera, claiming responsibility for the attack.”

Ibrahim was also asked to gather specific information for Youssef about a number of persons in Gaza, some of them known to be members of Hamas. When asked why he wanted this information, Youssef said, “I want them to join al-Qaeda.” At that point, Palestinian security services cut off the “Ibrahim-Youssef” contact, because it was becoming too dangerous.

At the same press conference, Colonel Shbak said direct money payments “transferred from Israel,” had been received by five out of the eight Palestinians who have been giving information to the Preventive Security Agency about this operation. Shbak also explained that his agency traced and obtained a number of telephone numbers, registrations, and bank receipts for money transferred to some of those persons.

Now, said Shbak, the United States and a number of inter- national intelligence and security organs had been supplied with documents and evidence refuting the Israeli allegations about Palestinian connections to al-Qaeda. “These documents prove without any doubt that the ones who are behind this alleged al-Qaeda group are the various Israeli intelligence organizations,” Shbak added. He told Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah daily that the “Americans have not responded yet to the documents . . . as provided by the Palestinian Preventive Security agency.”

The 9/11 Cover Story
The question is whether the U.S. government and other governments will take up the evidence given to them. It is well established that several top Cabinet officials in the current Sharon caretaker government, including Sharon himself, have a long, jaded history of staging precisely these kinds of “countergang” operations, using Israeli covert operatives and Arabs tortured and brainwashed in Israeli jails and recruited as false-flag terrorists. Sharon, Mossad chief Moshe Dagan, and Gen. Effie Eitam are proponents of such dirty-war tactics. As EIR reported in several extensive articles on the Hamas organization, that terrorist capability was actually created by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli right wing, for the purpose of supplanting Yasser Arafat and the organizations of the Pales- tine Liberation Organization (see EIR, Dec. 6).

Even more to the point, the Osama bin Laden authorship of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks has been a cover story from the first moments the media began reporting it as fact. Inter- viewed on the morning of Sept. 11 as the attacks were unfolding, LaRouche made clear that the breadth and sophistication of these attacks showed that it was “an inside job,” involving U.S. military and intelligence operatives capable of defeating or neutralizing all existing and backup security systems. Bin Laden was named as the culprit, explains LaRouche, because his name provided entry into the policy of a Clash of Civilizations against Islam, which right-wing neo-conservatives in the Bush Administration have as their goal. LaRouche has also pointedly asked when Osama bin Laden stopped being an American agent—a reality that the “Islamic card” networks of Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Iran-Contra financiers of the Afghansi mujahideen, want to bury. It must also be asked, when did al-Qaeda stop working for British intelligence? EIR has documented that British foreign intelligence, MI6, worked closely with so-called Islamist terrorist groups safe- housed in Britain, to destabilize Arab and Muslim nations, in the geopolitical service of Her Majesty’s government, and an Anglo-American imperial faction.

As recently as November, this coverup of British/U.S. covert support for terrorism continued, with the case of David Shayler, a former MI5 agent who was sentenced to six months in jail for disclosing “government secret information.” Shayler told London Guardian reporter Martin Bright that MI6 hired one of Osama bin Laden’s closest collaborators— Anas al-Liby, who remains on the U.S. government’s Most Wanted List, with a reward of $25 million for his capture— to assassinate Libya’s Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi in 1996.

Bright, who could not publish the article in the Guardian, but did so in the Pakistani daily, The Dawn, on Oct. 30, received a gag order from the British Attorney General, threatening him with prison, if he publishes any more information from Shayler.

With this background in mind, the public revelations about the Mossad attempts to set up al-Qaeda cells, could have strategic consequences for the discredited Sharon government—and even more broadly for the Clash of Civilizations zealots covering up the truth about Sept. 11. The Palestinian revelations could become the “straw that broke the camel’ s back,” in this dirty war.

Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory

Untitled-1

 Part I

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
February 3, 2015 Anno Domini

While agents of the Jewish-Masonic cryptocracy work around the clock spreading lies and disinformation, many sincere people are getting sucked into their traps. One of the fastest spreading fallacies of these agents is the conspiracy theory that the Catholic Church—through the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), the Pope, and/or the supposedly still-existing Knights Templars—are running the New World Order conspiracy.

“It’s not the Jews!” these agents and their naïve dupes claim. “We have been fooled for the last 400 years into thinking the Jews are leading the NWO when it’s really the Jesuits, the Vatican, and the Black Pope!”

The game of these agenturs is very simple. Everything that has been typically attributed to Jews for hundreds of years, for example, the creation of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the drafting of the Satanic Babylonian Talmud, and even Zionism itself, are all the work of the Jesuits. It’s a rewriting of history. Take every historical book from the last 2,000 years that names “Jews,” cross it out, and replace it with “Catholics” or some euphemistic term that indicts the Church and you have the Jesuit conspiracy meme summed up.

From attributing the creation of Zionism to an excommunicated Jesuit named Franciso Ribera to blaming the rise of Hitler and Nazism on the Church, there is no place the Jesuit memers won’t go. It borders on clownish with absurd claims that the Jesuits sunk the Titanic, created Islam, and assassinated John F. Kennedy. Of course, the grand proof they present of this alleged Jesuit conspiracy is Jewish Adam Weishaupt’s (founder of the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati) education under the Jesuits—something these Jesuit memers almost always bring up. Hypocrisy runs deep among these anti-Catholics, as they say in one breath that it is wrong to blame one group of people (especially Jews) and in the next breath they blame all the world’s problems on the Church. These clowns must have low regard for their audience for them to believe their blatant double standard goes unnoticed.

One hand tied behind the back
Before I go on here, I want to point out that this is not to absolve the Catholic Church of clerical abuses and legitimate corruption within it. And, of course, there is the heretical Second Vatican Council that has been foisted upon Catholics, which further maligns the legitimate faith and demonizes (at least in Protestant eyes) Catholics in general. This council is the handcuff that has one hand of the Church behind its back—done so that She would not be able to defend herself against the Judeo-Masonic onslaught going on. With the Church on the ropes, so to speak, the Jesuit meme is a sucker punch.

*a note on semantics

Meme
I would define a meme as the mindless replication or imitation of a concept or idea, especially a false one. Much of the popularity of the Jesuit meme is due to dupes, especially in conspiracy circles, who mindlessly accept, without verifying, the Jesuit meme and then replicate it.

53a5fd185b71aProponents of the Jesuit conspiracy meme
Based on their worldview, the Jesuit conspiracy meme is a convenient scapegoat and tool of self-deception for several groups, including but not limited to:

  • Jewish groups, Zionists (Jewish and Protestant)
  • Seventh Day Adventists
  • COINTELPRO
  • New or naïve conspiracy researchers
  • New Agers
  • Evangelicals, fundamentalist Protestants, Calvinists
  • Freemasons, Enlightenment thinkers
  • Catholic haters

The idea that Jews are running the NWO is rather inconvenient for them and exposes them for what they are. You would be hard pressed to find a Jesuit memer who is the slightest bit anti-Zionist. Many of them also happen to endorse other irregular conspiracy theories, like that of “reptilians” and “death fakers”. Then there are some who pretend to be anti-Zionist but with the appendage that the Vatican is really behind the Zionists. The fact of the matter is, the idea that there exists a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy has been a cultural belief for hundreds of years; whereas the Jesuit conspiracy is the counter-culture belief, in other words, the revolutionary belief. Furthermore, the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory has a huge amount of evidence behind it while the Jesuit theory has next to none. Jesuit theorists count on memetic replication, because if one actually checks their claims against recorded history, they theorists will be revealed as frauds.

Eric Jon Phelps Cointelpro Zionist 2

Key individuals promoting the Jesuit conspiracy meme

  • Alexander Hislop (rabid anti-Catholic Protestant)
  • Malachi Martin (Vatican infiltrator paid by the American Jewish Committee)
  • Eric Jon Phelps (Israeli diamond merchant)
  • Lyndon LaRouche (Quaker)
  • Edward Hendrie (Calvinist)
  • Seventh Day Adventists (masonic)
  • Walter J. Veith
  • Jordan Maxwell (scam artist and crypto Jew)
  • Christian J. Pinto
  • Thomas Richards
  • Craig Oxley (internet personality, disinfo agent)
  • Greg Szymanski
  • Dan Brown (fiction writer, not even an historian)
  • Tupper Saussy (bitter Protestant)
  • David Wilcock
  • Felix Pantaleon, aka Caliberhitter (COINTELPRO)
  • Sherman Skolnick
  • Pete Santilli (FBI informant)

The list of Internet personalities replicating the Jesuit meme seems to be growing by the day.

Common fallacious arguments of the Jesuit conspiracy meme

  • The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) created Freemasonry (through the Knights Templars] and is implicitly masonic itself
  • Excommunicated Jesuit Francisco Ribera created Zionism/premillennial dispensationalism
  • The Jesuits/Vatican control the monetary system
  • The Jesuits control Hollywood
  • The RCC created the religion of Islam (yes, they really claim this)
  • The RCC created the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati through Jesuit-trained (actually a converso) Adam Weishaupt
  • The RCC published (created?) the Babylonian Talmud
  • The RCC created the Nazis and is responsible for all anti-Semitism
  • The Jesuits are behind the CIA, Federal Reserve, and communism
  • The Jesuits ignited the French and Russian revolutions

Basics of the Jesuit meme: The Black Pope
The Jesuit theorists claim that the head of the Jesuits, the Superior General, is the “Black Pope”—one whose power supersedes that of the Pope and, subsequently, the Holy Church. This Black Pope and his Jesuits are said to be leading the New World Order conspiracy; although, none of the Jesuit memers can give a clear explanation as to what the Jesuits’ supposed goal of world domination is and why they seek this. In contrast, with the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory, the goal is quite clearly the overthrow of Christianity and Western Civilization. With the New World Order, regardless of who one think is leading it, it’s clear to anyone that the NWO conspiracy is attempting to dismantle all religions, especially Christianity. So, why would the supposed leaders of that conspiracy, the Jesuits, be working to destroy their own Christian-based institution? If one says the Jesuits are not Christian in the first place and this is why they are leading the NWO to destroy religion and Christianity, then one has to admit that either a). the Catholic Church also is not a Christian institution (which would require a whole new set of evidence and proof), or b). the Jesuits are saboteurs of the Catholic Church and Christianity in general. If one answers with “a”, then the root of the problem is not the Jesuits but the Catholic Church itself, since the Catholic Church predates the Jesuits. But the Jesuit memers don’t focus on this. The focus is all on the Jesuits. This is the clearest evidence that they have other motives for propagating this theory. Now, if the answer is “b”, then we can speculate as to who is really behind the Jesuits, since it couldn’t be the Catholic Church itself. Seeing as the first Jesuits were overrepresented with Jews and a Jew, one Ignatius Loyola, founded the Jesuits, it’s plausible that a Jesuit conspiracy against the Catholic Church and society were being orchestrated by Jews. Add to this the fact that Jews were closely involved with the Protestant Reformation, around the time the Jesuits were formed, and the plausibility becomes stronger. Further evidence that the Jesuits, if they are acting on behalf of the Church’s interests, are a failed world conspirator is in the fact that world trends are going in the opposite direction of everything Catholic, be it the Church’s pro-life stance, anti-modernism, traditional marriage, etc. Add to that the world’s slide towards nihilism and the Jesuit conspiracy theory loses even more credibility.

The “Black Pope’s” alleged fronts: Knights of Malta, Catholic universities

“Jesuit Trained” – Jesuit conspiracy theorists claim that the Black Pope works to subvert society by positioning Jesuits in high positions of power throughout the world via the Knights of Malta and Jesuit training centres (Jesuit-founded universities). Since Jesuit universities are open to the public and do not require students to be Catholics, much less Jesuits, it’s a little ridiculous for the Jesuit theorists to claim that so and so is a Jesuit agent or “Jesuit trained” merely because they went to a Jesuit-founded university. But that’s exactly what they do. Due to the spread of the disease of modernism, Jesuit universities are now more or less secular and hostile to the Catholic Church. For example, many Jesuit-founded universities advocate—not just accept—homosexual rights, abortion, women’s liberation, LGBT rights, etc. Historian E. Michael Jones, a well respected traditional Catholic, was fired by one of these supposed Catholic universities because he simply stood for traditional Catholicism. Whether a result of the Jesuits or Second Vatican Council proscriptions, these Jesuit universities cannot be considered Catholic other than by having Catholic roots. The claim of someone being “Jesuit-trained” is vague and meaningless in the context in which these Jesuit theorists give. They have to provide more than just someone’s mere attendance at a Jesuit-founded university. And with their claim that many Jesuits are secret members, they think they can disregard the burden of proof further more.

The Scottish and York rites of freemasonry and their degrees—the names of some which were hijacked from the Catholic Church.

The Scottish and York rites of freemasonry and their degrees—the names of some which were hijacked from the Catholic Church.

Knights of Malta – Jesuit theorists, where they can’t malign someone based on their university attendance, malign them by their membership with the Knights of Malta or even if someone displays a logo or symbol[i] bearing the remotest resemblance to the symbols of the Knights of Malta or the Jesuits. If those canards fail, they outright deceive their audience by falsely associating the Catholic Knights of Malta—officially called Sovereign Military Order of Malta—with Freemasonry. Speculative freemasonry’s York Rite has a degree titled Order of Knights of Malta (click on the image to the right to see a larger view of the masonic structure of degrees). The Vatican has issued a clarification stating that it does not recognize any other group using the Malta name but its own.

“…the Holy See recognises and supports only the Sovereign Military Order of Malta – also known as the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta – and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem. The Holy See foresees no additions or innovations in this regard.

All other orders, whether of recent origin or mediaeval foundation, are not recognised by the Holy See. Furthermore, the Holy See does not guarantee their historical or juridical legitimacy, their ends or organisational structures.

To avoid any possible doubts, even owing to illicit issuing of documents or the inappropriate use of sacred places, and to prevent the continuation of abuses which may result in harm to people of good faith, the Holy See confirms that it attributes absolutely no value whatsoever to certificates of membership or insignia issued by these groups, and it considers inappropriate the use of churches or chapels for their so-called “ceremonies of investiture”.[ii]

 

The Jesuit theorists must not have foreseen this embarrassing repudiation of their claims that the Jesuits and the Catholic Church are somehow masonic because of the Malta link. Perhaps had they done some actual research, they would have seen this coming and abandoned the lie. Furthermore, Freemasonry uses Jewish and Protestant names for its degrees as well. Using their reasoning, we could argue that Jews and Protestants are masonic because of this also.

The Knights Templar – Some Jesuit theorists will go so far as to say that the RCC founded freemasonry through the Knights Templar, a military order established by the Church at the beginning of the Middle Ages (the Templars eventually became corrupt and apparently compromised with gnosticism, and the Church disbanded them accordingly). Because the freemasons (an occult group established long after the Catholic Templars had been abolished) have a masonic title called “Order of Knights Templar Commandery”, part of the York Rite initiation, some confuse the two different Templar groups. Of course, the Jesuit theorists capitalize on this confusion and try to say that the two are one and the same. They elaborate on how the Medieval Templars supposedly evolved into what is now called freemasonry (they completely ignore the fact that the Catholic Church abolished the Templar order). The apparent gnostic influence on the Catholic Templars, before they were disbanded, was likely due to the spread of Kabbalism, so the Kabbalah is the root of what eventually became freemasonry, not “Templarism”. Consider that the written Kabbalah came into prominence in the 12th and 13th centuries, the same time the Templars were rising in power.

“The Jewish connection with modern Freemasonry is an established fact everywhere manifested in its history. The Jewish formulas employed by Freemasonry, the Jewish traditions which run through its ceremonial, point to a Jewish origin, or to the work of Jewish contrivers . . . . Who knows but behind the Atheism and desire of gain which impels them to urge on Christians to persecute the Church and destroy it, there lies a hidden hope to reconstruct their Temple, and in the darkest depths of secret society plotting there lurks a deeper society still which looks to a return to the land of Judah and to the re- building of the Temple of Jerusalem?”[iii]

Today, there is no organization called the Knights Templar, yet Jesuit conspiracy sites are full of references to them as if they still exist and run the world. Columnist Atila Sinke Guimarães explains in detail the history of the Knights of Malta and the Templars in contrast with their masonic imitators.[iv]

The suspicious trajectory of the Jesuit conspiracy theory
Whether the Jesuits were guilty of the charges laid against them in their early days, it’s highly suspicious that most, if not all, groups supporting theories against them were in league with Jews, be they Protestant reformers (late middle ages), Enlightenment thinkers, masonic/illuminist agents (18th and 19th centuries), and Jewish lobbies (20th and 21st centuries). All of these anti-Catholic groups are themselves accused of organizing and/or leading international conspiracies, so they have the motive to deflect criticism of themselves and provide a scapegoat in the hopes of saving face. Modern Jesuit conspiracy theorists appear to target two audiences: anti-Catholics and conspiracy researchers. The latter targeting functions to manage opposition to the NWO conspiracy and is further evidence that the Jesuit theorist meme is actually advancing the NWO’s revolutionary progress.

Nazi propaganda phamplet condemning the Jesuits.

Nazi propaganda phamphlet condemning the Jesuits.

The Nazi fallacy
So blind to history, the Jesuit theorists assume that because the Catholic Church is anti-Jewish by nature, restricted Jewish influence in society, especially during the Middle Ages, and helped spread anti-Jewish conspiracy theories, it must be that it was also in league with or brought about the rise of Nazi Germany’s racialist policies. Jewish lobbies share in common with Jesuit theorists this malicious libel against the Church. They blame Catholicism for the rise of Hitler and the alleged Holocaust of 6 million Jews. What they won’t tell their audience is that the Nazis propagated Jesuit conspiracy theories themselves—Hubert Hermanns’ The Jesuit: The Obscurantist without a Homeland[v], for exampleand persecuted and murdered Jesuits on account of their membership. But more importantly, Roman Catholic opposition to Judaism has always been on the grounds of the Jew as a “theological construct” created in opposition to Christ, in the words of Catholic historian E. Michael Jones. Papal decrees against Jews throughout the Church’s 2,000-year history maintains that Jewry should be resisted on the grounds of their rebellion against Christ and that Jews should be restricted from positions of influence in society, should they seek to subvert the Catholic theocracy. Papal bull Sicut Judaeis, first issued during the Middle Ages, is emphatic that Jews are not to be harmed. Furthermore, Catholics are forbidden on pain of excommunication to force convert Jews or take their property. Pope Callixtus II states in the original bull:

“[The Jews] ought to suffer no prejudice. We, out of the meekness of Christian piety, and in keeping in the footprints or Our predecessors of happy memory, the Roman Pontiffs Calixtus, Eugene, Alexander, Clement, admit their petition, and We grant them the buckler of Our protection.”

It’s obvious that because of the Jewish penchant for antagonistic behaviour, the Popes foresaw the potential for resentment of the Jews to evolve into pogroms. It’s absolutely absurd to think that the Catholic Church could in any way have brought about the “Holocaust” of the Jews, especially considering that 18 successive Popes re-affirmed Sicut Judaeis. The Church has not changed its stance in this respect. The Catholic Church never endorsed, either officially or unofficially, the policies of Hitler and the national socialists. Catholic opposition to Judaism then is quite different from Nazi opposition, which was based entirely on the assumption that Jews were racially corrupt.

The Jesuit theorist runs into a major contradiction when he attempts to say that Nazism is a Jesuit creation, because then he must account for his other theory that the Jesuits also supposedly created Zionism—something that runs contrary to Nazism. I won’t elaborate here, but the evidence suggests that Nazism is actually a Jewish creation, using a Cabbalist dialectic of opposites, which paved the way for establishing the illegal state of Israel in 1948 as well as the Holocaust dogma of Judaism[vi], which has undeservedly become iconic in recent history. There is also evidence that Hitler was not legitimate opposition to the Jewish money power, and even evidence that Hitler himself may have been Jewish.[vii]

Protestants Rewrite Bible

The Zionist fallacy
It seems the Jesuit theorist rests his entire claim that the Jesuits created Zionism on one obscure Jesuit who postulated a theory that was never established as Catholic dogma. It’s true that Jesuit Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) did advocate some views that would fall into a “futurist” eschatological point of view; however, it was not millenarianist, or of the premillennial dispensationalist type that lies at the root of the Christian Zionist heresy.[viii] Zionism comes from an arrested rendering of the Old Testament concept of a chosen people. This is why the Jews murdered the Old Testament prophets who tried to correct them on their perverted supremacist vision of what it meant to be God’s chosen people. This is one of the reasons why the Jews also murdered our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, for He pointed out the deception and evil in their supremacist yearnings. The whole Ribera claim is inconsistent in that Ribera allegedly concocted his views as counter-reformation teaching. But the Reformation was advocating futurism (specifically millenarianism), so how could he be countering it with more futurism (his supposed futurism was really amillennial)? Jesuit theorists are grasping at straws with this one. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that because the Jews rejected Jesus, they still await at future Messiah (futurism) when he will supposedly rule and reign with the Jews on the present Earth. Futurism, really messianism, is essentially Jewish. Furthermore, Ribera didn’t write his 500-page commentary on the Book of Revelation to start a new idea. He was indeed countering the Reformation propaganda of millenarianism, which held that the Papacy was the anti-Christ, Beast system, and the coming world messiah would destroy it and set up his millennial reign on Earth, headquartered in Jerusalem. Catholic teaching holds that the Church’s reign on this Earth since Christ died and was resurrected is evidence of fulfillment of Christ’s reign on Earth; therefore, a future millennial reign is not necessary.

The freemason fallacy
Equally as absurd and related to the Zionist fallacy is the claim that modern freemasonry is a continuation of the Catholic Knights Templars—Catholicism itself. Forget that Popes have issued decrees condemning freemasonry and its Enlightenment, libertarian offshoots; forget that Catholicism itself is philosophically and ideologically opposed to freemasonry, the Jesuit theorists are most persistent with this fallacy. Instead of providing any evidence that the Catholic Church is behind freemasonry, the Jesuit theorist will simply make the reach by associating the Church with freemasonry through the Knights Templars and Knights of Malta confusion. That’s their evidence—semantics.

Papal pronouncements against freemasonry and its offshoots—specifically “Americanism,” which sprang from the Enlightenment and masonic libertarianism—include but are not limited to the following:

Clement XII, Constitution “In Eminenti”, 28 April, 1738;
Benedict XIV, “Providas”, 18 May, 1751;
Pius VII, “Ecclesiam”, 13 September, 1821;
Leo XII, “Quo graviora”, 13 March, 1825;
Pius VIII, Encyclical “Traditi”, 21 May, 1829;
Gregory XVI, “Mirari”, 15 August, 1832;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Qui pluribus”, 9 November, 1846;
Pius IX, Allocution “Quibus quantisque malis”, 20 April, 1849;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Quanta cura”, 8 December, 1864;
Pius IX, Allocution “Multiplices inter”, 25 September, 1865;
Pius IX, Constitution “Apostolicæ Sedis”, 12 October, 1869;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Etsi multa”, 21 November, 1873;
Leo XIII, Encyclical “Humanum genus”, 20 April, 1884;
Leo XIII, “Præclara”, 20 June, 1894;
Leo XIII, “Annum ingressi”, 18 March, 1902 (against Italian Freemasonry);
Leo XIII, Encyclical “Etsí nos”, 15 February, 1882;
Leo XIII, “Ab Apostolici”, 15 October, 1890.

To demonstrate the seriousness with which the Church took of the heresy of freemasonry, 12 different Popes issued a total of 23 three papal pronouncements against it. No other heresy has received more attention.

The Judeo-masonic ambition to overthrow throne (monarchy) and altar (Catholic Church), which is well documented, was achieved through a series of subversions[ix] and revolutions—the French Revolution being one of which was most successful, as France was as stronghold of the Catholic theocracy. England, where Catholicism had been overthrown during the 16th-century reign of apostate King Henry VIII, was already under the control of freemasonry (specifically Rosicrucianism) and Enlightenment thought at the time of the French Revolution. Of course, the Jewish-masonic alliance was already well established during the 16th-century Protestant Reformation, so the Reformation was a natural fit for the anti-Catholic revolutionary arsenal of the cryptocracy; in fact, all the evidence suggests that freemasonry is a covert extension of Judaism—a sort of philo-Semitic religion with perhaps more aggressive methods than Judaism in destroying Christ’s influence on Earth. The Jesuit theorist will distort and twist history in all kinds of ways in a desperate attempt to fit their anti-Catholic, pro-Jewish worldview. It then becomes imperative for the reader to understand real history in order to see through the lies.

The Illuminati fallacy
When Adam Weishaupt founded the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria in 1776, it seems he intended to prevent the Jesuit order, which had at that point been suppressed by Pope Clement XIV, from regaining their former position in Europe.[x] Weishaupt was not a Jesuit himself; however, Jesuits educated him during his youth. Jesuit theorists focus only on this, while ignoring the more important manoeuvrings that were going on during the formation of Illuminist systems. Additionally, Weishaupt did not invent the concept of Illuminism, which was based on a perversion of the Catholic sacrament of confession.

“It wasn’t the goal of world domination, which, in the popular mind at the time, the Illuminati shared with the Jesuits that the public found as upsetting; it was the means whereby the Illuminati were going to achieve those goals. Weishaupt took the idea of examination of conscience and sacramental confession from the Jesuits and, after purging them of their religious elements, turned them into a system of intelligence gathering, spying, and informing, in which members were trained to spy on each other and inform their superiors.”[xi]

Jewish writer Bernard Lazare, an anti-Catholic, seems to brag about the Jewish orchestration of secret societies and the Illuminati:

“There were Jews around Weishaupt, and Martinez de Pasqualis, a Jew of Portuguese origin, organised numerous groups of Illuminati in France, recruiting many adepts to whom he taught the doctrine of reintegration. The lodges founded by Martinez were mystical, whilst the other orders of Freemasonry were rather rationalist. This permits one to say that the secret societies represented the two sides of the Jewish mind: practical rationalisation and pantheism.”[xii]

Some historians credit Martinez de Pasqualis with creating Illuminism, not Weishaupt.

The Illuminati wasn’t so much an organization as much as it was a concept of blackmail and espionage that was soon adopted by almost all secret societies, and it is still in use today. Talk about the Illuminati’s influence on society is sort of a red herring, especially in the way that it is used today. Modern conspiracy researchers portray the Illuminati as the end all, be all…as a highly organized institution, which it isn’t. It’s a concept or system. The Jesuit theorist obsession with Weishaupt, the Illuminati, and their supposed collaboration with the Jesuits shows their inclination to sensationalism rather than historical accuracy.

Notes

[i] Alex Jones supposedly a “Templar Jesuit” because he uses universal health symbol on his products – http://youtu.be/sm3GD70Tc1w?t=29s

[ii] NOTE OF CLARIFICATION FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF STATE – http://www.news.va/en/news/note-of-clarification-from-the-secretariat-of-stat

[iii] Dillon, Monsignor George F., Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, Edinburgh (1884), Revised Edition (1950), pg. 10

[iv] Are the Knights of Malta Members of Freemasonry? http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/are-knights-of-malta-members-of_16.html

[v] Hermanns, Hubert, The Jesuit: The Obscurantist without a Homeland, 1933

[vi] Condit Jr., Jim, The Final Solution to Adolph Hitler https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSeZoedS83w

[vii] Ibid.

[viii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, The Jewish command to deceive Christians about Bible prophecy, May 29, 2014, The Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/05/29/the-jewish-command-to-mislead-christians-on-bible-prophecy/

[ix] Vennari, John, The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita: A Masonic Blueprint for the Subversion of the Catholic Church, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1999

[x] Jones, E. Michael, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, South Bend, Indiana, St. Augustine’s Press, 2000, pg. 8

[xi] Ibid. p. 13.

[xii] Lazare, Bernard, Anti-Semitism: It’s History and Causes, Paris (1884), pg. 127

Goy Guide to World History

By Doctor E. Michael Jones

Part I

Part II

 

 

The Jewish command to deceive Christians about Bible prophecy

Destruction_of_Jerusalem_70-David_Roberts

David Roberts’ 1850 depiction of the divinely ordained destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

May 29, 2014 Anno Domini

It’s not by accident that there is so much confusion and disagreement within Christendom regarding Bible prophecy, specifically in the Book of Daniel, as it pertains to Israel.

Deep within the voluminous Babylonian Talmud, the “holiest” and superlative book within the Jewish religion that calls Jesus Christ a “bastard” and the “son of a whore”, is a brief rabbinic command and warning to Jews regarding anyone who attempts to understand the Book of Daniel’s prophecy of the advent of the Messiah, known as the Seventy Weeks prophecy.

“Rabbi Samuel b. Nahmani said in the name of Rabbi Jonathan: Blasted (cursed) be the bones of those who calculate the end. For they would say, since the predetermined time has arrived, and yet he has not come, he will never come.”[i]

There is a variation of this rabbinic command circulating on the Internet that is falsely attributed to “Talmud Law, p. 978, Section 2, Line 28”. Regardless, it accurately reads,

“May the bones of the hands and the bones of the fingers decay and decompose, of him who turns the pages of the book of Daniel, to find out the time of Daniel 9:24-27, and may his memory rot from off the face of the earth forever.”

For those not familiar with Christian Bible prophecy (eschatology: theology pertaining to death, judgement, and the final destiny of mankind), Daniel 9:24-27, which discusses the pivotal final week of Daniel’s prophecy, has been interpreted for the majority of Christianity’s existence as pertaining to the rebuilding of Jerusalem in anticipation of the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, culminating in His death and resurrection, totaling a prophetical span of 490 years. End of story. No gaps, no postponements, no future earthly kingdom, no Jewish theocracy, no Israeli state, no rapture, just 490 consecutive years, fulfilling the Seventy Weeks prophecy. (For a thorough explanation of the weeks, read here.)

DANIEL 9:27 And he (Messiah) shall confirm the covenant ( Rom 15:8) with many for one week (70th): and in the midst of the week he (Messieh) shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (by the Cross), and for the overspreading of abominations (of the anti-Messiah Pharisees and Sadducees) he shall make it (the old Temple) desolate, even until the consummation (70AD destruction), and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate (the Temple torn down not one stone remaining upon another).

Most evangelical groups have been led to believe that the above passage is talking about some anti-Christ figure instead of Jesus. And consistent with the rabbinic command to obscure the timing of the fullfillment of the Seventy Weeks, evangelical Protestants have no specified dates for the weeks, just that they will be fulfilled sometime in the future. So it turns out that evangelicals are obeying the anti-Christ Babylonian Talmud over the Bible.

One can’t help but think that the new interpretation, which basically twists the scripture to mean that Daniel’s final week was mysteriously cast off from the preceding 69 (gap theory) and is still yet unfulfilled (postponement theology), is a direct result of the Talmudic command that was foisted onto Christendom’s new evangelical movement, resulting in perhaps the greatest heresy of all time: Christian Zionism.

 

Cyrus Ingerson Scofield: crypto-Zionist who changed Americascofield_dees2

Support for Israel, the Jews, and the Zionist state isn’t natural for Christians. It is a heresy that has been learned over the last 100 years as a direct result of the Jewish-Masonic subversion of scripture.

Cyrus I. Scofield brought Judeo-Masonic England’s Puritan-based millenarian heresy to America in the late 19th century, and was helped by Jews like Samuel Untermeyer (his handler?) in creating the Scofield Reference Bible of 1909, which would be used to infuse Jewish-Masonic heresy into Biblical exegesis (interpretation). This reference Bible came with Jewish-Masonic-friendly footnotes side by side with Biblical scripture. The Zionist establishment arranged it so that this reference Bible was the standard among Protestant leaders and teachers. This ensured that the majority of preachers would be in agreement when indoctrinating their unknowing masses with Jewish-Masonic teachings on the future, specifically relating to the idolization of the state of Israel, which would come into existence in 1948, not long after Scofield and his work changed America’s thinking regarding Israel and the Jews, and not long before America’s foreign policy was shaped as a direct result of the false interpretations contained within the Scofield footnotes.

 

Jewish-Masonic millenarianism

The goal of re-establishing Israel, almost 2,000 years after God had it destroyed in 70AD by General Titus and the Romans, has been the longtime goal of Jews and Freemasons hoping to bring about their own concept of heaven on Earth. Since the Jews rejected Messiah, they would have to attempt to create their own Kingdom of God, with themselves as the central figure of worship. The Jews have perpetuated this anti-Christ utopian vision through the freemasons and Protestant groups like the Hussites, Albigensians, Puritans, and many modern evangelical groups, like the Southern Baptists.

Historian E. Michael Jones elaborates,

“…When European Christians first came in contact with Jews in significant numbers, ‘the desire of the poor to improve the material conditions of their lives became transfused with phantasies of a new Paradise on earth, a world purged of suffering and sin, a Kingdom of the saints.’ …The temptation to look for heaven on earth was known as Judaizing, which took messianic inspiration from a distorted interpretation of the Old Testament, but usually without the further distortions of the Talmud. It was a perennial temptation for Christians who failed to find solace in ‘a messiah who suffered and died [and] a kingdom which was purely spiritual.’ The Book of Daniel, the Christian Scripture most likely to be corrupted by Judaizers, seemed to prophesy an earthly kingdom while also offering a key to understanding history in the parable of the colossus with the feet of clay.”[ii]

The rebuilding of the Jewish Temple, in direct defiance of God, who destroyed it in 70AD, is a constant theme throughout Freemasonry and secret societies, as well as establishing Jerusalem and Israel as the central hub of the world (world government). Through Kabbalah, which is basically Jewish magic, Jews and masons believe they can attain their goals of creating an earthly paradise. Since the Renaissance, they have experimenting with various methods of achieving this, whether through black and white magic, alchemy, divination, transhumanism, technocracy, or necromancy, to name a few. The Babylonian Talmud itself can only have been inspired by fallen angels, passed down from generation to generation by willing anti-Christ rabbinical authorities.

70 weeks copy

Has the past century been shaped by a mere misinterpretation of the Book of Daniel?

It might seem incredible, especially to non-Christians, that the whole Jewish-Masonic mess in which we currently live could be based upon this rabbinic command to mislead Christians on the timing of Daniel’s weeks. But it’s Messianic implications are huge. The correct interpretation puts Christ at the centre of prophecy, namely that He fulfilled most of it, save the final judgment. The rabbinic-inspired interpretation, which most evangelical Protestants embrace, puts Jews at the centre of Bible prophecy and the Seventy Weeks fulfillment, which is extremely idolatrous. Are we, as a nation accepting Scofield heresy, being cursed by God for worshipping Israel and the Jews and abandoning the true God? Consider the outcome of a world without Scofield’s heresy. There would have been no support for the Jewish-Masonic goal of creating the state of Israel, no support of the Jewish people as God’s chosen, no need for the Nazis to pave the way for the creation of the state of Israel, no endless wars for Israel, no slaughter of the Palestinians…and perhaps many more alternate outcomes.

“If there had been no Scofield Bible, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism, such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush, would most likely have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive to U.S. interests”, writes Israel Shamir. “Moreover, the American people might have been spared the well-publicized pro-Israeli rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.”[iii]

One can certainly see why the rabbis would invent such a curse. Calculating Daniel according to exactly how it is written would have hindered their plans for attempting to set up their false kingdom.

“May the curse of heaven fall upon those who calculate the date of the advent of the Messiah, and thus create political and social unrest among the people.”[iv]

This Satanic proscription not only deceives Christians and the Western world, it deceives Jews, who are being hindered by the rabbinic theocracy from seeing Jesus as the fulfillment of Daniel’s weeks.

 

[i] Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin 97b, London, Soncino Edition http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_97.html#97b_19

[ii] E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 94.

[iii] Israel Shamir, Zionism’s un-Christian Bible http://www.israelshamir.net/shamirReaders/english/Cathail–Scofield-Zionist-Bible.php

[iv] Louis Newman and Samuel Spitz, The Talmudic anthology: tales and teachings of the rabbis (Behrman House, 1945): 277

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Stratfor's JonesesBy Timothy Fitzpatrick

May 24, 2014 Anno Domini

Some websites are falsely reporting that Alex Emric Jones, of Infowars, worked as webmaster of Stratfor (Strategic Forecasting, Inc.) in 2005, according to Anonymous’s hack of Stratfor emails and credit card data in 2011.

A little research shows that the webmaster of Stratfor in 2005 was another Alex Jones, also from Austin, Texas (Stratfor, a Zionist-run intelligence gathering apparatus, is located downtown Austin, Texas, where Alex Emric Jones also lives). This other Jones is Alexander S. Jones. In reading the emails between this webmaster and others within Stratfor, as well as emails mentioning Alex Emric Jones, Stratfor staff make clear distinctions between the two. The webmaster used the email jones@stratfor.com, which some mistakenly believe is what implicates Alex Emric Jones with Stratfor. But this is not the case. The Anonymous hack also revealed paid clients of Stratfor’s intelligence forecasting service, of which one was definitely tied to Alex Emerick Jones of Infowars. That email address is 1oldpath@infowars.net, which is a domain owned by Alex Jones and Free Speech Systems LLC. Jones owns other domains as well. Another so called patriot-9/11 truther discovered in the Stratfor clientele was the late Michael Ruppert, under mruppert@copvcia.com. Ruppert, like Jones, was heavily criticized for giving a kosher explanation of the 9/11 conspiracy, completely absolving international Jewry of any involvement. And yet another “truther” was implicated, one Michael Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com using wrh@whatreallyhappened.com. Is it any wonder that Rivero has not touched the Infowars-Stratfor scandal? Up until recently, Rivero has been rather soft on the Jewish/Zionist question. Keep in mind now that the hack does not specify whether Stratfor’s clients are paid or not (except for some) and whether they are using Stratfor’s intelligence services above just gaining access to data. Either way, it’s difficult to believe that Jones, in light of all his other Stratfor connections, is just using Stratfor to read a few articles. He said on his show once that Stratfor “puts out propaganda,” yet he is their subscriber. This statement is disingenuous as much as it is an alibi for Jones. There is a high probability that Jones and Stratfor are in cahoots.

A sreenshot showing one of Alex Jones' email addresses in the Anonymous hack of Stratfor clientele lists.

A screenshot showing one of Alex Jones’ email addresses in Stratfor clientele list leaked by the Anonymous hack.

The confusion over the two Alexes associated with Stratfor has given fuel to Alex Jones’ diehard fans, who show this as proof that the Alex Jones-Stratfor scandal is a bunch of hot air.

Unsurprisingly, Stratfor has denied the accuracy of its hacked emails released via Anonymous and Wikileaks. In those emails, Stratfor’s rank and file repeatedly talk about Alex Emric Jones. There is not really any smoking-gun information contained in them. However, the fact that Jones is some kind of client receiving intelligence from Stratfor is alarming enough and could have serious ramifications for the way the public perceives Infowars and its so-called news reporting. For example, Jones’s accurate prediction of the 9/11 attacks was perceived as being because of Jones’ own intellectual intelligence and insight on world affairs. It gave Jones credibility early in his patriot career at the time, and still does. But if he received that information from Stratfor, or perhaps from one of his Zionist handlers, then he is presenting it under false pretenses. If this is true, it calls into question everything he says. And because Stratfor and Alex Jones have their own agendas, or agenda, as the case may be, it’s logical to assume that we aren’t being told the whole truth, despite what Jones claims. Then there are all the other compromising connections between Alex Jones, Stratfor, Zionists, the CIA, and even freemasonry.

Alex Emric Jones’ other Stratfor connections

IP HarvestingAlex Jones Shill Bronfmans

Another disturbing possibility is that Infowars is harvesting information from its subscribers as well as anyone who visits the website and passing it on to Stratfor and perhaps to the government. Planet Infowars admits in its privacy policy that it may hand your information over to government entities and other third parties.

3.2. “we may use your personal identifying information” “when complying with an order” from “..other government entity…”

3.4. “We us cookies, log files, and third parties to create a profile of our users and the information gathered is personally identifiable as belonging to you…”

3.7. Any information you disclosed to third parties on our Website or other websites becomes public information, and you should exercise caution when deciding to disclose any personal information.

Follow the Stratfor-Infowar scandal:

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

The Stratfor Infowars – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

Did fallen angels help Jews write the Protocols of Zion?

Nephilim Protocols of Zion

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

The credibility of the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, an intricate and ingenious hundred-year-old blueprint for global domination, has stood the test of time against dismissive and deceitful charges.

Because of its implication of the Jewish money power, naturally, it has incurred the wrath of the Jewish-controlled press, academia, pseudo historians, heretics, and political pundits. It has been called everything from an anti-Semitic forgery written by the Russian secret police to a Vatican-shadow-written libel against Jewry. While these charges have little to no evidence, little has been said about its highly elaborate scheming and cunning word play. It’s comparable to almost any classic work in its imagination and mastery of plot. Works of such reputation are typically considered divinely inspired or of the vaporous odours from the bowels of hell.  The occult has worked through the medium of drama and literature for millennia, Shakespeare’s (kabbalist Sir Francis Bacon?) The Tempest, for example. On the other hand, pen and the stage have brought us messages from the divine, that is, from God, the Logos; the Holy Bible is the premier example. Christopher Marlowe’s exposition on the British Judeo-Masonic cryptocracy, Doctor Faustus, and Johann Andreas Eisenmenger’s stunning 17th century exposé of Judaism in Entdektes Judentum are just a couple of other example with regards to divine defense against the Judeo-Masonic plot. In modern times, the transparency of the threatre is even more apparent with today’s far less sophisticated forms of drama and writing.

Are the Protocols the work of genius Jewish minds?

DBP_1979_1030_Doctor_Johannes_FaustJews often boast of their supposed intelligence, and their lapdogs in the Evangelical Protestant pulpit do also. But just how smart are they? Could they have written the diabolically ingenious Protocols? Historically, the Jewish conspirators against Christ and His Church have been cabbalists, that is, practitioners of magic and divination, according to the Jewish unholy book, the Kabbalah, which is more revered than the Old Testament in Judaism. White magicians attempt to distort the devilry of their craft by claiming that they only summon good angels through their incantations. But the Church has always taught that if one summons spirits, regardless of intending to summon ‘good’ spirits, only evil spirits will manifest. Thus, is it unreasonable to conclude that anti-Christ Jews plotting the overthrown of the Christian Church in England, Europe, and Russia throughout history and especially during the time of the writing of the Protocols were guided by dark spirits—those whom they regularly summon up through their sorcery and wicked rituals?  This would make a lot of sense, because angels, even fallen ones, have knowledge far greater than men. And where there is superior knowledge, there is power, and this power is used to control others (Gnosticism and Freemasonry). For all we know, Sir Isaac Newton, a Jewish kabbalist and alchemist, could have received his scientific knowledge from the spirits he regularly conversed with. We do know that his mechanistic bias provided the foundation for the Jewish-Masonic Enlightenment and still lingers today in the form of modernism, materialism, and so-called skepticism. And what of all the other supposed great Jewish minds credited with bringing knowledge and innovation to the world? Where this knowledge hasn’t been outright stolen and forged from others, could they, too, have merely passed on what was relayed to them by their dark spirits?

With God inspiring the Holy Bible, Lucifer and his fallen angels answered back by inspiring the Babylonian Talmud, the Jewish Kabbalah, and blueprints like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

1Thessalonians 2:15 The Jews…who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Are the Jews capable of carrying out a 2,000-year plan all by themselves?

How is it that one group of people have, for generations, kept the plan outlined in the Protocols of Zion going on all these years? How have individual conspirators been able to contribute to it through the narrow vision of only one generation, which is about 70 years at best? It would take a great deal of vision, unification, and determination to carry out such an ambitious plot. Or perhaps, like the inspiration for the Protocols, the same dark spirits have guided the Jews as they execute every jot and tittle of the Protocols. The Protocols, published in 1905, work in two directions: they sum up history at the start of the Jewish-Masonic Enlightenment and French Revolution to the then-future Russian Revolution. But beyond that, the Protocols outline a plot that is completely consistent with the Jewish revolutionary spirit, which began as far back as the Pharisees who screamed for the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ almost 2,000 years ago. Since Jesus’ coming, the Jews have worked tirelessly in attempting to overthrow His influence over the world. In truth, the Protocols are really only a snippet of their war strategy against Christ and His saints. If God ceased leading the Jews following the the sealing of the Old Covenant at the death of Christ, who is leading them now? Could it be that the elders of Zion acted as channellers of the Protocols, mediums for Satanic spirits?

In the Middle Ages, demonic interaction with mankind was widely known, thanks to the Church’s divine influence in the world. Today, due in part to Newton and his anti-spirit influence, angels and demons have been but completely forgotten. And this has aided the cryptocracy’s hold over mankind, for fallen angels are the hidden power behind world events today; they are the hidden power behind the Jewish-Masonic plot. The Book of Genesis as well as the non-canonical Book of Enoch seem to go so far as blaming the fallen angels for the fall of mankind…for all evil on Earth. Men seek these fallen angels out for knowledge in the hopes of using that knowledge to have power over others and to gratify their passions—a Faustian tradeoff.

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Austin Texas Zionist Terror Cell Infowars

Photo Illustration By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Austin Texas Zionist Terror Cell Infowars

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

We are over a year now into the revelation that popular alternative radio show host Alex Jones is a Zionist agent working for Israel’s intelligence front Stratfor, yet virtually none of the alternative media outlets are exposing this much less even mentioning it.

The only people that have talked about it are Mike Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com and an obscure character named Pete Santilli, who appears to be cointelpro. Rivero has done no followup on the issue. Santilli was recently outed as an FBI operative. So where in the world is Jeff Rense? He has been feuding with Jones since his departure from GCN a few years ago, perhaps he is too afraid to open that can of worms, or perhaps he is afraid of being implicated in the whole mess. For all we know, Rense could be an operative as well. Did the alternative media just miss this gem of a story or are they complicit in the coverup and, quite possibly, tied to Stratfor and/or Israeli intelligence themselves?

Let’s look at the Stratfor connections to Alex Jones:

Stratfor's West 6th Street building in Alex Jones's hometown of Austin, Texas. Notice that Stratfor shares the building with usurist Zionist bank JP Morgan Chase.

Stratfor’s West 6th Street building in Alex Jones’s hometown of Austin, Texas. Notice that Stratfor shares the building with usurist Zionist bank JP Morgan Chase.

There is a Youtube video circulating that claims an Infowars server leads to Stratfor. However, the video is listed as private and I have not been able to confirm if this is true. If it is, it certainly just adds to the overwhelming evidence now that Jones is what people have been saying for years: that he is a Zionist agent misdirecting the patriot movement—a controlled opposition tactic used by the Soviets.

To those who say this article is an unfair attack on Alex Jones employing the use of argumentum ad hominem (guilt by association) fallacies, it certainly isn’t. If there were only one, maybe two, Stratfor connections to Alex Jones, I might agree with them. But clearly, there is an overwhelming number of connections—too many to ignore. Then you have his many Jewish associations and his on-air confession of being a Zionist.

A shot of Alex Jones' Dogwood Creek Drive home. Looks like he has a nice pool in his back yard covered by trees. This is a gated community.

A shot of Alex Jones’ Dogwood Creek Drive home in Austin, Texas.. Looks like he has a nice pool in his back yard. The pool is covered by trees, but you can see the outline of it.. This is a gated community. Apparently, Stratfor takes good care of Jones

Molly Maroney Infowars Editor

The Infowars Magazine editorial team slug with Maroney as it appeared during her tenure as managing editor and graphics contributor. She left Infowars in August 2013, at least officially. John McEntire replaced her as editor.

While researching this article, I came across a clip of Jones doing a poor job deflecting the Stratfor accusations. In the video below, a caller brings up the Stratfor connection to Molly Maroney, but says her name incorrectly as “Mallory Mahoney.” Strangely, Alex Jones does not correct the caller about the obvious error and instead repeats the incorrect name as a lie saying “Mallory Mahoney is one of our graphics people that works here at the office.” Jones also lies by omitting on air that “Mahoney” (Maroney) is much more than just a graphics person; she is the managing editor. Is he lying about her name so that anyone who checks it out will run into a wall? He must not think too highly of his listeners if he thinks they will fall for that. He then goes on a tirade about how normal it is for Texans to intern at Stratfor and how the caller was “mentally ill” for daring to question him as the supposed benevolent researcher he is. This isn’t the first time Jones has called his detractors mentally ill. Then he contracts himself by saying he understand why people are suspecting him of being possible disinfo. So we are all mentally ill, yet he understands?

Jones claims that a third of journalism students at the University of Texas at Austin intern at Stratfor. Is Jones accidentally telling us that Stratfor grooms its cointelpro agents at UT? This also raises the question of how many more Stratfor interns have or are currently working for Infowars. I am sure Alex Jones’ many Jewish advertisers are happy with this arrangement. This video clip shows that Alex Jones is fully aware of the accusations that he is a Stratfor operative. He doesn’t bother to ask the caller to explain the question; he immediately goes into attack mode as soon as he hears “Stratfor”. Then he diverts the discussion to strawman arguments, insinuating that all his detractors accuse him of being Bill Hicks or a reptilian (ridiculous claims purposely planted to muddy the water). One last important point about this video clip, Jones provides himself with a weak alibi by saying that in his opinion, “Stratfor puts out propaganda”. Look at his face when he says this. Even he knows it comes off as disingenuous. We are not buying it, Alex, but nice try.

After searching extensively through the Stratfor emails from 2005-2011 as released by Wikileaks, it becomes clear that the emails are really only those by the rank and file employees, with the ones from the higher ups having little to no significance. Therefore, when speaking of Jones, the emails appear detached from Jones and Infowars. Jones’ Stratfor mission must be known by only a select few or by only Stratfor head George Friedman himself.

Related Articles:

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

Alex Jones uses subliminal messaging in documentary Police State 4

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

Alex Jones promotes Zionist heretics Jeffrey and Missler

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Illuminati Agents – Series IV

Jewish mathematician caught editing Alex Jones Wikipedia page

Invisible Empire references NWO 140 times ad nauseum, not one mention of Zionism

Sovereign/Freeman movement is a dead end

Is that a hidden triple six embedded in the Freeman society's new age-looking logo?

Is that a hidden triple six embedded in the Freeman society’s new age-looking logo?

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
There is much appeal to the so-called sovereign, or freeman on the land, movement. It shows its adherents that there is a vast monetary conspiracy which holds the citizens of the planet in perpetual bondage and that there is a procedure to remove oneself from this.

While it is true that there is a global conspiracy ruled by money, the sovereign movement, which has its roots in the WASP establishment, doesn’t stop there and eventually takes its followers down a path of deception and ruin.

For years, I held back on advocating for or against this sovereign movement, with the intention of giving it time to prove itself. It has failed miserably and ruined the lives of many well meaning people. How sincere persons fall for this deception is apparent in the near-truth appeal of the freemen on the land. Yes, there is a global economic conspiracy. Yes, there is no law in the United States that requires one to pay income tax. Yes, the common law is a suitable law for a civilized society. But it is foolish to think, as the movement’s adherents do, that one can escape this monetary matrix simply by writing a series of homemade letters to state officials and the Queen of England or arranging words in such a way as to declare independence from the system when facing a magistrate.

The sovereign citizens movement claims that the conspiracy is based in Universal Commercial Code (UCC) or that we, as artificial corporate entities called ‘persons’, are actually governed by Maritime admiralty law (the law of the seas). The fact that our names are written in all upper case letters on government documents is the alleged proof that we are merely corporate instruments traded within the UCC system. While these codes certainly allow for control of good and services as well as people, they are not the root of the conspiracy. And publicly declaring oneself independent of this system has no effect whatsoever, as has been proven by the repeated failures in the courts by sovereigns. Afterall, the lawmakers and their interpreters (lawyers) can get away with interpreting laws in any way they see fit. The Bible declares that the love of money is the root of all evil. Evil…is at the root of the monetary conspiracy. The only way to declare oneself independent of this evil system dominated by monetary instruments is to repent of ones sins and follow Christ, who is the liberator of mankind from the bondage of sin. The sovereign movement offers an illusory salvation through its system, which is based on letter writing and language manipulation. Sovereigns are doomed to a life of, at worst, jail time or, at best, a life of constant fighting to declare oneself independent. Spend enough time around a sovereign and you will see that much of their time is taken up by summons to court or learning the latest letter-writing technique (there is always “new light” to be learned since their methods always fail in a court of law). Adherents are always kept in a state of delusion. When they inevitably fail to convince a judge of their independence from admiralty law, they are comforted by another sovereign and advised that they simply didn’t use the right combination of words to secretly tip off the judge as to the sovereign’s true freedom.

The sovereigns point out that the City of London is a separate corporate entity. They claim that the UCC law, under which every man and woman is supposedly enslaved, is run by the British Crown in conjunction with the Vatican. Much of this speculation is fueled by Jewish disinformation of a Vatican/Catholic world conspiracy. This is a strategic deflection carefully crafted by the Elders of Zion. The Crown is certainly a big part of the world conspiracy, but remember that Jewry took over England shortly after Henry VIII’s bastard daughter Elizabeth and her court astrologer John Dee cast a spell over England, allowing for all kinds of evil to flourish. England became the new Jerusalem to the Zionist millennialists. And while the Vatican has become corrupt, especially since the Second Vatican Council, it is not a key player in the world conspiracy. The function of the now Jewish- and homosexual-infiltrated Vatican is to water down the Christian faith, to modernize and scandalize it. In reality, Talmudic Judaism and its money-changing disciples are the masters of money on Earth. They are headquartered in London, New York, and in other places and are not limited by the incorporation of cities, municipalities, or persons. They are not limited by codes or laws, and especially not letters of declaration (sovereign’s supposed claim of right) or language manipulation. The world’s modern courts system, based on interpretation and legalism, resembles something based in the Jewish Talmud and Kabbalah (the late Eustace Mullins makes some plausible claims about the courts and Kabbalah; Michael Hoffman, in Judaism Discovered, makes clear connections between the modern legal system and the Talmud). The British Crown can only be an extension of this kabbalistic system. It’s certainly no secret that most judges are Freemasons—Freemasonry being a Britishized from of Jewish cabalism. A branch of the sovereign movement called the redemptionist movement, founded by Roger Elvick, touches on the Jewish aspect of the usury/debt slave system, but fails to see its spiritual relationship: that we are enslaved by evil men (led mainly by Jews) through usury and debt but that our own personal sin and abandonment of God makes this enslavement possible, not our lack of knowledge of techniques and procedures.

If true liberation from bondage comes from knowing Jesus Christ, then the freeman movement is not only providing a false solution to the problem of bondage and slavery, it is affirming it by diverting its followers form the real answer. So delusional are the sovereigns, they naively believe that we were somehow free when only the common law existed, even though usury and sin still prevailed. Considering the sovereign’s unconscious affirmation of slavery and bondage, it’s no surprise that many sovereigns take their “enlightenment” to extremes, like using their letter procedures and statements of claim to get out of paying bills, everything from utilities to cable and phone. The rotten fruits of their deception finally evolves from its pseudo-liberating theology to outright theft.

Another rotten fruit exhibited by sovereigns, and as indicated by the Freeman society logo above, is their new age, communitarian tendencies. To justify their theft, sovereigns will often claim that no one holds ownership over anything (Judeo-Masonic goal of abolition of private property); therefore, everything is for the taking for the sovereign. Many sovereigns will use Christian-like language in order to deceive new recruits of their benevolent motive. They will mix it in with new age concepts of oneness and mother earth. Is it any surprise that Zionist shill and occultist Jordan Maxwell is a leading advocate of the sovereign movement?