Vancouver one giant Trump Tower, Soviet Chabad laundro-mansion

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 19, 2019 Anno Domini

If we take Trump Tower to mean a place where Sino-Soviet oligarchs can launder their blood-soaked cash, consider Vancouver to be the biggest.

It is one of the most Soviet-penetrated ports in the Western world: Vancouver, the gem city on Canada’s West coast—a once beautiful city now plagued with rampant drug addiction, homelessness, and massive displacement of the European-derived indigenous population, largely due to one of the most inflated housing bubbles in human history. Things are so bad in Vancouver, Vancouver’s heroin-fentanyl-riddled downtown Eastside has become infamous around the world.

Seemingly bewildered civic and national officials continue to fail to find a solution to “the Vancouver model“. But that’s because they fail to identify the root of the problem, which is now out in the open for any non-ostrich to see.

The root of the problem is the Soviet narcotics offensive, with much of Vancouver’s drugs coming from Communist China’s Golden Triangle region, and Sino-Soviet money laundering, which involves the KGB (now FSB), Chinese intelligence, and the Sino-Soviet-Semitic international organized crime syndicate, including Chabad Lubavitch. The Chabad mafia just happens to have a large presence in Vancouver, with at least half a dozen operations in the city.

The provincial government, the socialist BCNDP, has been forced to admit that money laundering is largely responsible for the city’s problem, but they won’t develop this explanation to its necessary conclusion, which is that Vancouver’s problems are by design and part of a long-range Leninist Soviet strategy to destabilize the West. Get the indigenous population, especially its youth, hooked on and killed by drugs, thereby reducing the white, Western population; flood the real-estate market with laundered Soviet cash, much of which is the proceeds from Red narco-terrorism; use the effective housing inflation to drive out the local population; and, finally, increase Chinese-Korean migration to insure against any relapse of said displacement.

This same plot is taking place in several places in the Western world. In California’s Silicon Valley, for example, the exact same thing is happening.

Instead of admitting the root of the problem, Canadian officials ignore any discussion of the matter and, instead, attempt to curb these Soviet active measures by imposing ineffective across-the-board housing taxes on foreign buyers and absentee landlords. They don’t seem to understand that this Soviet plot is not about money. The Soviets don’t care about taxes. They are willing to take loses in order to ensure the advancement of their strategies. It was the Chinese communists, after all, who greatly subsidized the cost of heroin to American soldiers during the Vietnam intervention, as an effective means of destabilizing America’s armed forced. Therefore, Canadian officials need to focus on, at the very least, banning foreign buyers all together, including identifying and stopping the many shell games that Soviet agents like to use in anonymously laundering cash through real estate.

Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou.

Many Sino-Soviet elites, like Communist-controlled Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, own estates in Vancouver’s posh mansion district Shaughnessy, where you will find some completely empty mansions. Wanzhou’s estate mysteriously seems to be in a perpetual state of renovation, like others. These are, effectively, Soviet laundro-mansions. Shaughnessy, which is located very close to the Chabad district of Vancouver, is a microcosm of the macrocosmic Soviet active measure throughout all of Vancouver, Silicon Valley, and in other places in the West. So, too, is Vancouver’s Trump Tower (Toronto, where the same housing bubble exists, also has a mobbed-up Trump Tower). Real estate seems to be the primary instrument through which gangsters and gangster-run governments, like in Marxist Russia, China, and Israel, launder their money.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a devoted Marxist  and son to suspected KGB asset and former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, has done absolutely nothing thus far. Until Canada’s elected officials grow a collective set of functioning gonads and identify the problem, this Soviet penetration is only going to deepen and wreak havoc on Canada.

The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel

Soviet-created anti-Zionist leaflets dropped in Syria depict Israel and the “evil West” running ISIS, as propaganda to agitate the Muslims against West and into Communist hands.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Realizing the truth of the Perestroika deception has changed our understanding of the entire geopolitical game significantly.

This rare knowledge, brought to us by brave souls like Anatoliy Golitsyn, has made everything clearer. We can now see the full scope of Jewish power today in a world swarming with disinformation and controlled opposition.

If Jewish Bolshevik power never left Russia but remained and, as one of its objectives, created and groomed Israel as a Soviet satellite, is it reasonable to assume that the infamous Elders of Zion—the Kahal— are based in Moscow and not Tel Aviv?

Remember that Jewry once used England as its base of operations, thanks to traitors like Oliver Cromwell, and it appears that not long after Judaic ‘Brit’ain helped found the masonic republic of the United States of America, Jewry set its sights on the Holy Russian Empire, not only to eradicate Christian monarchy but also to set up a base of operations for its international super government.

And if the Chosenite base of operations resides in the Lubyanka, whether through its international crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch, the POLITBURO, or the still-functioning COMINTERN, it can only be reasonable to assume that its Balkanization plan for the Middle East, commonly known as the Oded Yinon Plan, is also directed from Russia. What’s more, the Yinon Plan seems to serve as a model for a global Balkanization scheme, which is nothing more than old Soviet expansionism, with Eurasian-led global collectivism as the ultimate goal.

Well, as it happens, Russia has a long history of fomenting anti-Zionist agitation, especially in the Arab world. When they aren’t dropping leaflets from planes over Syria with cartoons of America and Israel puppeteering ISIS, the crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is directing almost every single liberation organization (color revolutions) in the Arab world and even in the West. These liberation organizations—like the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), for example—have been telling Muslims for decades that they must rise up against the great Zionist power and its Western backers America. Israel and the West are the great Satan, the rhetoric goes. This is an awfully convenient narrative for anti-Western communist expansionist aspirations, isn’t it? In the West, the KGB-run Irish Republican Army (IRA) is anti-Zionist and even overtly Marxist, as was the violent FLQ separatist group in Quebec, Canada. The continuity is all there: “liberation”, anti-Zionism, and Marxism. Yet no one of prominence seems to make these obvious connections. Of course, these liberation fronts are all about “liberating” said nations expressly so that they can be gobbled up by Soviet expansion.

This Soviet agitation of the Muslim world achieves several key goals for Jewish world imperium:

1. It makes possible the potential for creating Islamic terrorism, which can then be used in false flag attacks around the world, not just in Islamic countries. This terrorist threat can be exported to virtually any Soviet satellite or through its criminal network in the West—all the more so when Israel and double agents within Western intelligence are providing cover for the export. With authentic terrorist attacks, it serves by keeping the Jewish people (at home and abroad) in a constant state of fear and in subjugation to their Pharisaic Jewish leaders (as the Protocols of Zion presciently revealed over 100 years ago, “Their anti-Semitism is indispensible to us for the management of our lesser brethren”). The wave of modern terrorism also has the benefit of providing a pretext for Western countries to bring in oppressive police measures on the general population (this also benefits the technocracy aspect of Jewish global conquest: non-stop surveillance, smart grid, environmentalism [also Soviet controlled], etc.)

2. By linking the West to Jewish oppression of the Arab world, the West is discredited and demonized to the Arab world, leaving Muslims sympathetic to Soviet expansionism in the Arab world (Arab oil, among other things) and in the West (including in Ukraine and Europe). This demonization of the West only fuels more indignant Muslim radicals to commit terrorism and/or join Russo-Judeo-controlled false flag capers like ISIS, Al Qaeda, ISIL, etc. in Western countries. 

3. To moderate Muslims, Soviet agitation pits them against the West and even their own Arab leaders (who are mostly KGB assets, like Assad in Syria), because Soviet propaganda has moderates believing that Israel and the West are behind Jihadist groups, which is partially true. Essentially, this is the driving force behind the Balkanization of the Arab world: moderates against radicals, radicals against the West and Israel, moderates and radicals against their own government—just constant infighting. That’s been the Russian-Jewish strategy since Israel was founded in 1948 (Israel’s legitimacy was first officially recognized by the Soviet Union).

4. Finally, with this constant fracturing and splintering of Islamic states, displaced Muslims are left fleeing to the West, which furthers the Russo-Judeo Kalergi plan of diluting white, Western, Christian nations with Muslims, blacks, Asians, etc. in order to create a massive mongrel slave class—primed for a technocratic Orwellian clamp down. Western liberals, who should be more opposed to Islamic immigration than anyone (due to Sharia), have been tricked into supporting the Islamic invasion of the West because they perceive Israeli oppression of the Islamic world as being part of British-American colonialism, which they hate far more than Sharia law. Colonialism, however liberals perceive it, is considered the greatest evil in history. Therefore, they feel a sense of guilt and sympathy to the perceived plight of the Islamic world. This Leftist perception did not come about by accident. It was planned this way. Now, Leftists are falling for the gambit and cheerleading the Kalergi plan.

5. The perception of Russia as the anti-Zionist hero of the Middle East and as an Orthodox Christian ethno state serves the final goal of hoodwinking the last bastion of opposition to global communism: Western nationalists/conservatives. Win them over and it’s game over. This is where we are at today. Putinist Russia and the Trump regime are all about streamling conservative/nationalist sentiment into communist hands in Russia. The Western Left is already Marxist; all that is left is to honeypot conservatives and anti-communists. This goal is almost a done deal, as most in the alt media and in the nationalist cause are pro-Russia, pro-Trump. What the Jewry does next remains to be seen.

Hopefully by now, you can see how both Russia and Israel benefit from anti-Zionism. Anti-Zionism does not hurt Israel. It only plays into Jewry’s hands. Russia plays the good cop while Israel plays the bad cop. The bad cop pushes the Arab world into the seemingly loving arms of the good cop. 

Another benefit of running and controlling the global anti-Zionist movement is that Jewry gets to homogenize their opposition into a smaller, more manageable “opponent”. How many individuals seeking the truth on the Jewish question have been derailed and suckered into becoming anti-Zionist activists? Plenty. Was Rachel Corrie’s death really heroic? Zionism itself has little to do with the age-old Jewish question. The Jewish problem has been around a lot longer than the state of Israel has. In this way, anti-Zionism serves as a distraction.  Kremlin organs like Zerohedge and Russia Insider facilitate this same homogenization scheme but using a slightly harsher tone than anti-Zionism (I wrote an article about this using Russia Insider as an example). It seems that these organs rarely ever cast Israel or Jews in a negative light without first implicating the West.

Ultimately, Zionism serves Jewry by allowing it to control its opposition, its own people (at home and abroad), as well as Christian Zionists, and allows Russia to control the Arab world. Control of the Arab world gives Russia, in cooperation with China, the resources it needs to economically and genetically overthrow the West and helps it to water down and weed out opponents to world Jewish collectivism.

Russia Insider is a honeypot

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 12, 2018 Anno Domini

Russia Insider is the rebirth of Russian-Jewish oligarch Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

Both strategically use anti-Jewish narratives in order to honeypot gullible people, at which point the sticky-lipped dupes are either rounded up and imprisoned or simply indoctrinated.

It is the latter in the case of Russia Insider, which is a go-to source for many Westerner alternative media junkies and Russia supporters.

Started in 2014 with the help the Kremlin and its oligarchic mafia (like Duginist Konstantin Malofeev), at the time when the neo-Bolshevik Putin regime was amping up its aggression against Ukraine, Russia Insider is the perfect Soviet double agent within the Western nationalist movement (not the first time the nationalist movement was infiltrated by the Soviets). They say all the right things at the right time, but when push comes to shove, they play the Judas Goat and mislead their audience into a Soviet Trust land of hypernormalized confusion and disinformation. One of Russia Insider’s creators, John Helmer, is alleged to have been recruited by the KGB. Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman has been featured on Kremlin-state media.

Looking at the lead article today at Russia Insider: “CHUTZPAH: CIA/Mossad Instigate Chemical Attack in Syria, Accuse Syria of Doing It”, the Soviet active measure of demoralizing the West is furthered. Instead of being told the truth, that Israel and Russia are the main players destroying Syria with largely Russian-groomed Chechen Jihadists, the clever crypto-Soviets spin it to being the fault of the “evil West”…then throw Israel in the mix as the gambit (notice it puts the CIA first, before Mossad). Peruse the rest of the site and all you will find are “articles” that can’t say enough great things about Putin and the Kremlin.

Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman featured on Kremlin-controlled state media multiple times.

Of course, this is all OK with Israel, because Israel is simply helping big brother Russia execute its long-range goal of demoralizing and destabilizing the West. Israel doesn’t mind being thrown under the bus, so long as it serves the overall goal of destroying the West and bringing it within the grip of its Judeo global governance scheme, with Israel, Russia, and China leading the world into the “Olam ha ba”. And what better cover than for Russia Insider to pretend to be opposed to globalism, a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup.

Almost all of the Western alternative media serves very much the same purpose: blame everything on the West (resulting in divide-and-conquer polarization), vindicate Russia and Arab Soviet satellites (Iran, Syria, etc.). This game is so obvious. Putin is not mystical or that unpredictable. His hypernormalization strategy is now out in the open. He is simply a more sophisticated Soviet leader pursuing the usual active measures against the West, but this time, he has a lot more Western leaders compromised than his predecessors had—take for example Angela Merkel in Soviet satellite Germany. Putin’s Red predecessors only really had Eastern Germany to puppeteer. Now the Kremlin has all of it and its largest economy in the European Union.

Pat Buchanan and Right either misled on Russia or controlled opposition

Pat Buchanan

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 5, 2018 Anno Domini

As a second response to Father Michael Ruskin’s comments regarding my open letter The Russia Deception of Western Nationalists and the Church, let me start off by saying that Pat Buchanan is no competent analyst of geo-political affairs. 

He has demonstrated this repeatedly, whether it’s ignoring the International Jewish elephant in the room or falling for long-range Soviet deceptions like Perestroika and Glasnost. His is nothing more than kosher konservatism in the spirit of Lenin’s Soviet Trust “monarchist” leagues honeypots. 

Father Ruskin quotes Buchanan, “…Russia’s regime is no longer Communist. The ideology that drove its imperialism is dead.”

OK, Pat, I’ll agree with your first statement, partially. Sure, Russia is no longer “Communist”. It’s actually far worse than 1940s communist USSR, because now it uses far more sophisticated psychological propaganda (like hypernormalization) and has the technology to enforce it in a beyond-Orwellian fashion. Therefore, it’s a hybridized communism that appears democratic, as Golitsyn repeatedly warned us (Has Buchanan ever even read Golitsyn’s work?) As for his second statement, where does he conjure up that the ideology behind its imperialism is dead? Clearly, Buchanan, like most of the Western world, has fallen for the Perestroika Deception. Pat must have a miniature replica of the broken Berlin Wall on his mantlepiece. News for you, Pat. That was a staged incident designed to legitimize one of the greatest deceptions of our time.

“‘Perestroika’ is a great trap of the dark powers. They are preparing something new and more terrible. Russia is standing on the threshold of the Antichrist.” —Hieroconfessor Archimandrite Nektary (Chernobyl)

Someone please tell Buchanan that his failed 1980s analytical template is long due for an overhaul. Or perhaps he has no template but is just taking orders from the Soviet-infested establishment Right. Is he not also a diehard supporter of Jewish-Russian-controlled Trump, the biggest fake conservative  on the planet?

As for God’s work in Russia, we know that it’s taking place regardless of the Soviet-led Moscow Patriarchate and fake Christian Putin. That is what St. Tikhon’s Catacomb Church system was all about—keeping the true faith alive amongst the state-sanctioned presence of the anti-Christ Moscow Patriarchate. This is another area where it appears Buchanan, a so called Catholic, has no clue. If you want to understand the Eastern geo-political situation, you have to know about the complex Church history there, which includes the Catacomb Church or the Russian Church Abroad (colloquially known as ROCOR).

St. Philaret of New York addressed the situation thus:

“And here is something to which I would like to draw your attention to – something about which very many do not think about. Father Archimandrite Constantine, whom probably many of you know, the reposed editor of the journal “Orthodox Rus’”, a profound Christian mind, considered that the most terrible among all the achievements of the communists was that the communists created their own false-church, a soviet church which they shoved onto the unfortunate people in place of the genuine Church which went underground into the catacombs. Do not think that I am exaggerating or that Father Constantine was exaggerating!”

Regarding Father Ruskin’s acceptance of Putin’s mere words, Putin can trash talk communism all he wants. Talk is cheap. It means nothing to those who can see what is really taking place. Putin talks out both sides of his mouth, like all politicians do. They are all liars and deceivers.

“Russia is allowing for Christianity to affect the nation’s conscience,” Ruskin said.

The Kremlin is allowing a bastardized form of Orthodox Christianity to affect the nation’s cohesion…for the sake of geo-political strategy…and demoralization. This is also why homosexuality and feminism are restricted in Russia—not because they are immoral but because they have a detrimental effect on national unity and military camaraderie. In short, the crypto-Communists in Russia are using the vestiges of church and morality as a means to an end (Golitsyn also predicted this)—to foment their national Bolshevik aspirations, which will then be used to lead a Eurasianist world empire.

Heretics embrace: “Pope” Francis and Moscow Patriarch Kirill.

Ruskin goes on to question how I can condemn Russia while the West legislates overtly anti-God laws. Further to what I stated in the previous paragraph, it turns out that Russia actually has validated its first gay marriage. As far as the Vatican II conciliar Church and the Anglican Church are concerned, who do you think it is that is “dialoguing” with said homosexualized churches? None other than Tobacco Metropolitan Kirill and his Soviet Moscow Patriarchate.

“What does the claim Russia is deceiving Christians in the West actually mean? It’s a nothing-burger,” Ruskin writes.

How is it a nothing burger when it appears that most Western conservatives and Christians are so deceived about Putinist Russia that they would seemingly support a full-scale Russian invasion of America and the “evil” West? These sheep are now flocking to Russia in hopes of finding a white, Christian paradise. Good luck in multi-cultural Sharia Russia. They will be disappointed. Hopefully, those expats already living there have realized that Russia is not the land of milk and honey they thought it would be. 

There is no reason to believe that either Kirill or Putin have repented of communism. For every seemingly anti-communist rhetorical statement from either of the two, I could find ten pro-communist statements and pro-communist manoeuvres. Don’t let confirmation bias convince you otherwise.

As for Soviet-infiltrated NATO, former Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen recently began working for a Russia-affiliated bank. Why, the current NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, has a KGB past! It’s pretty obvious now that NATO is completely useless in terms of its original purpose. Why would NATO need to overthrow Ukraine’s so called president when NATO and the globalists are pursuing the same goals? It’s all theatre now, to make is think we have a choice and stand on one side. Pretty much every world power is in cahoots with all the others. That’s how the game works now. Nation states are long over. Now it is merely the world state, with the odd scuffle over who gets to lead it. Seeing as Russia was the pioneer of communism, it feels that it has the right to lead the world communist government that is forming before our eyes. 

Tell me, how do you know Poroshenko is a CIA asset? The only source I have seen for this claim is Russian mainstream media, which has a long history of blaming their crimes on the West and its intelligence establishment. I am not saying he isn’t an asset, but we shouldn’t assume that the Russian mainstream media is telling us the truth. And the alternative media is no better, as it is generally pro-Russia and infiltrated by Russian trolls.

Ruskin said, “Putin merely helped the people of Crimea defend themselves against that overthrow.”

How do you know this? Again, it appears this is just regurgitated rhetoric from Kremlin state-controlled mainstream media. The same people are telling us that the Holodomor never happened and that Stalin was much nicer to prisoners than we are led to believe.

“Finally, you posted a picture of a Communist, perhaps from the 1930’s, secreted in a church and snaring a Russian civilian who was outside. The unfair implication is that this is happening now. Would it be any more truthful if you had shown another picture of a paedophile priest inside a Roman Catholic church, busily snaring a child who was in the vicinity? I think not.”

First of all, I am not Catholic. If you read under that picture, I wrote a description of that Soviet propaganda art suggesting it has dual meaning. On the one hand, the Soviets are saying that Christianity is a snare for the gullible. On the other hand, they could be admitting, cryptically, that their Soviet-controlled Moscow Patriarchate is really the snare. Remember, Satanists have a history of bragging about their crimes in plain sight (it’s called “revelation of the method”). This macabre twist serves to demoralize the victim and empower the Satanists.

It’s important to realize that part of the Leninist strategy is to gain the trust and participation of nationalists and Western conservatives. To achieve this, the communists have to pretend to be nationalists and conservatives. That’s where we are today and one of the reasons Trump was selected by the establishment as president. He is a Judas Goat type rounding up all resisters to the NWO world takeover and there to discredit the last shred of credibility the Right had. What’s more, he was sent in to divide the populist. Divide and conquer.

A response to Father Michael Ruskin regarding the Russia deception

Anti-Christian Soviet propaganda. Perhaps this rendering has dual meaning. On one hand, the Soviets portray the church as a religious snare, but on the other hand, perhaps they are crytpically telling Russians of the Soviet control of the Patriarchate of Moscow.

The following is in response to comments made by Father Michael Ruskin of Christ the Saviour Antiochian Orthodox Church of New Zealand to my open letter on the Russia deception.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 5, 2018 Anno Domini

Dear Father Michael,

Your sobering reminder about the daily battle within ourselves is without a doubt the most important battle in our day-to-day lives. The Holy Scriptures warn us that the ultimate struggle is not with flesh and blood but with things of the spirit. How correct this is.

But let us realize that communism and its subsidiaries are not merely physical and political constructs with which to enslave humans beings. They are deeply spiritual—so much so that Patriarch Tikhon died to protect his flock from its spiritual perversion, not just its physical oppressiveness. It is not called “Godless communism” without good reason. In hindsight, Tikhon was justified in moving the Church into the catacombs, as the resulting Marxist churches (permitted by Lenin and the Soviets) that sprang up in both East and West (Vatican II) would evolve and attempt to replace the true one, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Prior to its Marxist infiltration, the Vatican also issued grave warnings about the communist threat. The Eastern and Western Churches were in complete agreement on this. But where are these warnings in the new Sovietized churches? No where. They don’t exist. Communism/Marxism is no longer a threat, they have us believing.

Is Putin doing anything more than Lenin in permitting the existence of the Sergian church in Russia and its subsidiaries in the West? Where is the rebirth of authentic Orthodoxy in Russia today? Shouldn’t this be reflected in Russia’s statistics, which have sky-high abortion rates, broken families, and essentially the same problems as the “evil” West? How many Russians even know of the Catacomb Church? In truth, both Putin and Lenin are responsible for the rebirth of the orthodox church—a Soviet mongrelized church. Patriarch Kirill follows the Sergian line of illegitimate succession, it seems. And lo and behold, Kirill is “former” FSB. During the Red Terror, the Soviets created schisms within the true Church and even honeypot “anti-Soviet” traditional churches to lure the flock to their deaths. How can we be sure Putin will not (perhaps he already has) do the same? Golitsyn claimed in the 1980s-90s that the crypto-Soviet power would offer concessions to the Church—effectively gambits—as part of its long-range strategy to woo social conservatives. And this is exactly what happened. In the following quote, Golitsyn speaks of the subversion of the Church.

“It fails to understand that greater apparent official tolerance of religion in the Soviet Union is accompanied by a secret drive to increase Party and KGB penetration of the Catholic and other churches and to use agents therein for political and strategic purposes inside and outside the Soviet Union. As part of the programme to destroy religion from within, the KGB, in the late 1950s, started sending dedicated young Communists to ecclesiastical academies and seminaries to train them as future church leaders. These young Communists joined the Church, not at the call of their consciences to serve God, but at the call of the Communist Party in order to serve that Party and to implement its general line in the struggle against religion.” (pg. 116, The Perestroika Deception)

Brother Maurice Pinay spoke in the 1960s of the same phenomenon of subversives entering the Catholic priesthood. It seems the same has happened in the Orthodox Church. Both Kirill and the Bishop of Rome, Pope Francis, are ecumenists who espouse communist views. This only corroborates Golitsyn’s warnings.

Golitsyn narrows down Russia’s false democratisation plot and concludes with,

“It is, however, a false, cosmetic liberalisation. For example, the alleged religious relaxation is a spectacle produced and managed by the KGB and the high priests of the church who are KGB agents assigned to fulfill the strategy…In the present phase, secret agents in the Catholic and other churches are being used to implement Communist strategy. When they achieve their Communist world victory, they will use mass withdrawal of their agents to disrupt and destroy the churches. Never in its history since Nero has Christianity faced such a threat of possible destruction. The dictum of the late Pope Pius XII about the incompatibility of Communism and religion is as correct as ever. The Vatican should reaffirm this dictum and should use its influence and its ‘divisions’ to defend Western values from the new Communist assault. (pgs. 189, 116-117)

Keep in mind that Golitsyn said all of this long before Kirill became patriarch. Can you honestly say to yourself that it’s a mere coincidence that the “tobacco” metropolitan happened to be pulled from communist ranks of the KGB?

The idea that the Russian Federation is the last bastion of Christian orthodox theocracy and, therefore, must defend itself is a wonderful one, but it does not stand under scrutiny. Firstly, many proponents of this perceived Russian-theocratic state point to the number of NATO military bases surrounding Russia as an indication that Russia is not an aggressor but is, instead, only acting defensively. But they can’t seem to explain how this supposedly superior Western-led NATO military occupation couldn’t manage to stop Russia from annexing Crimea, much less retaliate. Aside from a few show sanctions imposed by then U.S. President Obama (a secret communist himself) and other Western nations following the annexation, we didn’t so much as see a budge from a single NATO tank in response. Why? The only two conclusions one can come to is that NATO and the West are not militarily superior to Russia and her allies or, worse yet, the two sides are in on the charade together. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty has been invoked only one time, following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks—provoking a Western-led military campaign in which Russia acted quite passively, even endorsing the U.S. narrative of things. Is NATO really anything more than just a show army designed to trick Westerners into thinking the communist threat is being dealt with while the threat actually becomes stronger? I fear this may be the case, especially seeing as the Soviet plan involves dismantling NATO by subversion, not by guns—the same way the Church is being co-opted.

In the spirit of Lenin and his living student Aleksandr Dugin, defenders of Russia point to the infectious moral decay of the West and how this legitimizes Russia’s social and geopolitical manoeuvrings. While this is true about the West’s moral decay, these defenders don’t seem to be asking themselves what the motive is behind these charges. It’s one thing to point out immorality from a Christian perspective but quite another to point it out for strategic reasons. Is Russia portraying the West as evil because it is truly evil or is it doing so to weaken its morale? I can’t count how many Westerners I have seen cheering on Russian (Soviet) penetration of the West thinking it will destroy globalism. How ironic and twisted. These same also fail to acknowledge the large Soviet hand in furthering the moral decay of the West. Soviet penetration of Western governments is one thing, but when you have Soviet penetration of the education system, it becomes all the more obvious how we got to where we are today. The Western counter-culture revolutions of the 1960s were largely hatched in the Soviet Union. Are we supposed to forgive and forget all of this because the media has shouted from every rooftop that communism has fallen? And why should we trust the media, when it is part of the morally decayed West? Think about how we learned of the fake collapse of communism: from Western media. If the “evil” West truly hated “orthodox” Russia, you would think they would have been a little more prudent in assessing the validity of the purported fall of communism. Why was it immediately accepted without any kind of investigation? The crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is playing a classic globalist dialectic of creating the problem: cultural Marxism in the West, and offering the solution: neo-Bolshevik one worldism led by Russia.

Father Ruskin, you claim that the European Union is collapsing of its own volition, but consider that Europe’s largest economy resides in Germany, whose head Angela Merkel happens to be a “former” Soviet. It’s reasonable to say that Germany sets the tone for the EU. All Russia would have to do to manipulate the EU is have at least one rogue EU state under its control; although, I am sure it’s actually more than just one. Germany fits this hypothesis. It could be said that Merkel is the single biggest saboteur of EU migration norms. With Merkel being a communist in the service of the crypto-Soviet Union, it seems that “Russia” is leading the campaign to de-Europeanize Europe. Yet, we are being told the opposite by Western Russophiles. Is it just a coincidence that Dugin’s Eurasian utopia concept is consistent with Kalergi’s Pan-European utopia?

As for Putin’s so called social conservatism, Russia recently has just had its first legal same-sex marriage. Russia’s decades of strategic corruption of Western mores has finally returned to its master. It’s now only a matter of time. And blaming the West will be invalid, as the Soviet Union was pretty much the birthplace of the sexual revolution. In their occultic vision, the serpent’s head has reached its tail.

Your concluding statement, “It’s drawing a long bow to suggest they resurrected the Church to lull us into a false calmness before deceptively overwhelming us,” describes what Golitsyn explains as failed Western analysis of the Soviet threat. And as the above quotes show, this is exactly the kind of sophisticated enemy with which we are dealing. This is not about fearing the Kremlin and its diabolical plans but about discerning it…in righteousness.

Respectfully yours,

Timothy Fitzpatrick

Trump controlled by Mossad – Part V

Trump at event with broadcaster Mike Wallace (second from right) and Mossad super spy Robert Maxwell (right). One of my readers believes the man in the middle is future Trump administration Attorney General Jeff Sessions, but I am not sure.

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 3, 2018 Anno Domini

Why and for whom had convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged procurer girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell bugged the sexual encounters between his elite friends and children and prostitutes? Was it merely for billionaire Epstein’s own gain or was it for someone else? Was Epstein the ringleader? Or was it actually his girlfriend?

It seems unlikely that the already-rich Epstein did it for his own blackmail purposes. It’s difficult to find a clear motive. Epstein doesn’t seem like a politically ambitious character. Instead, he seems content with his billions and sexual license. What seems more likely is that Epstein and Maxwell were doing it for a third party. Let’s continue to speculate, as we have for the breadth of this series, that that third party is Israel’s bloody spy agency Mossad and about what they stood to gain from Epstein’s sexual blackmail of prominent people, especially U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump rides Lady Ghislaine in Mossad super cell

Maxwell and the Lady Ghislaine.

Donald Trump revealed in 2002 that he had been friends with Jeffrey Epstein for 15 years. That would put the start of their friendship around 1987; although, it’s possible their friendship began earlier. The late disgraced Mossad superspy and media mogul Robert Maxwell (Jewish name: Abraham Leib Hoch, of a Chassidic Jewish Czech family), the father of Epstein’s alleged child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, held a party on his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine (named after his favourite daughter), sometime in the spring of 1989. Guess who was at that party? Donald Trump. Also on board, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch[1], were Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. senator John Tower (of Iran-Contra scandal infamy), and other prominents, like ex-navy secretary John Lehman. Whether Epstein was at that party is anyone’s guess, but it’s certainly plausible, as Robert Maxwell had extensive dealings with bankers and financiers, including the Rothschilds, his “trusted friends” Goldman Sachs, and Lehman brothers. You’ll remember from the first part of this series that Trump’s yacht, Trump Princess, was purchased from Mossad asset and major Iran-Contra player Adnan Khashoggi. Maxwell’s £12-million yacht, Lady Ghislaine, was purchased from one of Khashoggi’s brothers. As we will see, Maxwell himself was a significant player in the Iran-Contra affair on behalf of Israel’s Mossad and, to some extent, the Soviet Union.

Ghislaine Maxwell (right) with Abigail Klem, chief brand officer of Ivanka Trump’s clothes and accessories line, at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party at The Core Club in New York City, February 14, 2007.

So now we have established not only a long-standing relationship between Trump and Epstein but also between Trump and two Maxwells—Robert and his daughter Ghislaine. Trump’s late father Fred personally may have known Robert Maxwell as well, as Fred was involved in major real estate projects that would have interested characters like Maxwell and his money-laundering thug pals in the Soviet Union, who laundered much of their dirty money through New York and Florida—two places in which Donald Trump has primary residences. Donald Trump and Ghislaine could be friends, business partners, acquaintances, or perhaps something more. The trio (including Epstein) has been spotted together on multiple occasions, including when golf magazine writer Michael Corcoran sat with Trump, Ghislaine, and Epstein on Trump’s private plane in order to conduct an interview.[2] In 2007, Ghislaine Maxwell was photographed with Ivanka Trump’s future brand officer of her clothing company at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party in New York City in 2007. Trump and Ghislaine may have been intimately involved with each other. Whatever the case, on board Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989, Trump was in the hands of a Mossad super cell.

Trump, Melania, Jeffrey Epstein, and GhislaineMaxwell at Trump’s Florida residence Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, February 12, 2000. Epstein’s residence is blocks away.

Robert Maxwell: Soviet-friendly Mossad superspy

In that same year Trump was riding the Lady Ghislaine, Robert Maxwell was extremely busy scheming and scamming his way to riches and power, simultaneously working for himself as publisher of his British media empire, Mossad, the Soviets, and organized crime—all of which benefited each other in multiple ways. Maxwell biographers Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon write, “Maxwell used the power of all his newspapers to attack Israel’s enemies” and that he had “acquired a rare and privileged position in the communist world.”[3] When Maxwell wasn’t making hundreds of millions hocking Mossad’s pirated and bugged version of Bill Hamilton’s PROMIS software to intelligence agencies, governments, and criminals around the world—even penetrating the Unites States’ most secure nuclear installation, Sandia National Laboratories—Maxwell was helping Jewish-Soviet mob bosses like Simeon Mogilevich launder money through various world banks and through Maxwell’s complex web of dummy corporations (in the fourth part of this series, we learned of Trump’s role in helping the Mogilevich syndicate launder money through his real estate ventures. Mogilevich also got his hands on a copy of PROMIS, which was allegedly sold to Osama Bin Laden, among others) and brokering deals with likes of Soviet presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and Leonid Brezhnev (purported to be close friends with Maxwell), as well as KGB boss Vladimir Kryuchkov (the main player in the staged “August Coup” against Gorbachev and Perestroika). Maxwell helped Mogilevich obtain an Israeli passport through the Mossad.[4] Perhaps it was Maxwell who first introduced Trump to Mogilevich and other Jewish oligarchs and crime figures. Perhaps they even met on the Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989. Perhaps this is when the Soviets, through mobsters like Mogilevich, first recognized the potential to blackmail and groom Trump as an agent of influence. Former FBI director John O’Neil—who died his first day on the job; September 11, 2001; as head of security at Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center—told journalists that Maxwell’s complex money laundering schemes became the model for Soviet and other organized crime syndicates.[5] Evidently, Trump would go on to walk in Maxwell’s footsteps, providing channels for Soviet oligarch loot—stolen from the mostly peasant millions upon millions of victims of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe.

Was Epstein blackmailing for Mossad through the Maxwells?

Seymour Hersh

To bring plausibility to the theory that Epstein and/or Ghislaine were running the child-sex blackmail ring on behalf of the Mossad, we have to establish a clear link to the Mossad. One is Robert Maxwell, via his daughter Ghislaine. The weight of evidence suggests that in 1991, the Mossad, itself, murdered Robert Maxwell after he allegedly tried to blackmail them into paying off his massive debts and because of the implications of the revelations in The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy by journalist Seymour Hersh that same year that Maxwell had been a secret spy for the Mossad—something that was not publicly known up until that point. Maxwell was apparently assassinated shortly after the publication of Hersh’s book, after British Labour MPs George Galloway and Rupert Allason quoted before the House of Commons a portion of Hersh’s book as it pertained to Maxwell and demanded an investigation into Maxwell and his Mossad ties.[6] The Hersh citations, then free to be reported on by the press under parliamentary privilege, found their way into the British media, and Mossad’s charade began to unravel. Hersh also revealed that one of Maxwell’s Mirror editors, Nick Davies, had helped Maxwell and the Mossad betray former Israeli nuclear technician whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu. Mossad defector Ari Ben-Menashe claimed that in 1986 Robert Maxwell alerted the Israeli embassy (Mossad) that Vanunu had given The Sunday Times a story exposing Israel’s nuclear development at Dimona.[7] Vanunu mistakenly thought that he was giving an independent news outlet the story of the decade. Instead, what he got was a Mossad honey trap, which resulted in the Mossad kidnapping Vanunu after being lured to Italy by a woman of the Mossad. Vanunu was then incarcerated for 18 years in Israel. These revelations, along with Maxwell’s mountainous debt, his ever rising complications with money laundering in the Soviet Block, and his supposed blackmail of the Mossad, appear to have led to his assassination on the Lady Ghislaine 5 November 1991, just weeks after the Hersh bombshell.

Then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir with Robert Maxwell in 1991. Shamir also ran assassinations for Mossad from 1955-1965 and is believed to have been involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Apparently, the Mossad had had enough of a man Likudnik Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir once described as having done more for Israel than any other man on the planet. But remember, there is no honour among thieves. Many high-level operatives were murdered in the aftermath of the Iran-Contra affair—the affair itself being used expressly to help Israel arm Iran and Iraq as part of a Balkanization scheme, which became known as the Yinon Plan.[8] Israel also used the scandal to install Ronald Reagan as president—clearly the preferred choice of the Likud-Chabad syndicate. Donald Trump would go on to become Reagan 2.0 in 2016. Maxwell directly aided the Yinon Plan-Iran-Contra scandal by helping to arm Iran with weapons from Poland. Kryuchkov was fully aware of Israel’s interests in arming its enemies and played right along (Mossad-KGB collaboration). “So the Iranians get to kill more Iraqis. Then, when Teheran is on top, Israel starts to supply Baghdad so as to kill more Iranians.”[9]

Ghislaine Maxwell went on the record stating that her father was murdered, despite the botched investigation that tended towards either a suicide or accident conclusion. Ghislaine didn’t hint at who might have carried out the hit. Would she go on, only a few years later, to help Mossad set up Operation Jeffrey Epstein knowing that the very people she was working for might have killed her dad? Or did her father receiving a state funeral in Jerusalem—attended by the Israeli government’s top brass—fool her into thinking that Mossad was innocent of her father’s death? More interestingly, yet, perhaps she never volunteered to aid the operation in the first place but was approached by the Mossad and obliged out of fear that she might meet a similar fate as her father. She could have detached herself from the past in order to gain what Mossad could have offered her. She was reportedly the most practical in her behavior after learning of her father’s death. It seems she is not a woman ruled by her emotions.

More Epstein-Maxwell-Mossad connections

Ehud Barak

Another Mossad connection between Maxwell and Epstein is Ehud Barak, former Israeli Prime Minister. While working for Mossad and helping Soviet Jews immigrate to Israel, Robert Maxwell would meet with Barak, who was then director of Aman, Israel’s military intelligence.[10] After authorities sentenced Epstein for child prostitution in 2008, they discovered a black contact book containing names of many prominent people, some of whom Epstein is believed to have blackmailed. As well, it contained contact information for some of the child victims. Barak’s name is in there…and it is was circled by Epstein’s former housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez (since died mysteriously) as being one of many to either witness or participate in Epstein’s abuse of young girls. Also circled were the names of Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Alan Dershowitz, among others. Henry Kissinger—close friend to Robert Maxwell—was also listed in Epstein’s book.

Another (potential) Mossad connection with Epstein—also with Robert Maxwell—is late Jewish billionaire bankster Edmund Safra. In a long list of Iran-Contra-Oded-Yinon players, Safra also appears to have been assassinated, in 1999. Safra’s name and contact information were found in Epstein’s black book. Safra was the owner of National Republic Bank of New York and helped Robert Maxwell launder money from the Soviet Bloc.[11]

Maxwell’s involvement in the Soviet Perestroika deception

KGB head Vladimir Kryuchkov.

In addition to Seymour Hersh’s exposure of Robert Maxwell as a secret Mossad spy, Israel may have also feared what Maxwell might reveal about Zionist-Soviet collaboration as well as the Perestroika (restructuring of Russian communism for public consumption) deception, of which Maxwell would certainly have had knowledge, being a close friend with Kryuchkov—one of the fake plotters used to legitimize Perestroika and Glasnost as authentic. Kryuchkov helped Maxwell set up 600 companies through which to move dirty money around the globe; some of that money was made from the theft of U.S. technology. The Soviet defector who exposed the perestroika plot, Anatoliy Golitsyn, says this about Kryuchkov:

“As a leading KGB official, he supervised the experiments with ‘democratisation’ in Czechoslovakia and Poland. His KGB advisers worked closely with the Czechoslovak and Polish security services. As deputy head of the KGB since 1978, Kryuchkov has been intimately engaged in the preparation of ‘perestroika’.”[12]

Before Maxwell became a media baron, he served both in British intelligence and in British Parliament as a Labour MP. Ideologically, he appears to have been the quintessential socialist Jew, except when it came to his own capitalist businesses. Maxwell even smoked specially rolled Cuban cigars on the order of Fidel Castro himself.[13] So it was that Maxwell would go on to collaborate with the Communists in the Soviet Union to help Jews colonize Israel and to help the communists rob blind the proletariat. The Soviets began to issue visas to its Jews planning to immigrate to Israel following Maxwell’s visits to and collaboration with the Soviet Union.[14] The astute reader will remember that the Soviet Union, next only to the United States, was the first to recognize the illegal state of Israel in 1948. I won’t get into it here, but it’s well-established that communism and socialism are constructs designed to advance exclusively Jewish interests. Maxwell, and almost certainly Mossad, could have been part of the Soviet development of the Perestroika deception (the fake collapse of communism designed to bring down the guard of the West). The Mossad’s motto, after all, is By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War. Could Maxwell’s alleged blackmail of Mossad have involved disclosure of Israel’s collaboration with the Soviets and their perestroika fraud? It seems that such a revelation would have been more detrimental to Israel’s long-range global plan—especially in light of their immense alliance with Russia today—than anything Mossad defectors Victor Ostrovsky or Ari Ben-Menashe revealed as motives—not to say that what they revealed wasn’t significant. It certainly was.

Maxwell with Soviet leader Leonid Brehznev (middle) in 1978.

Golitsyn summarizes the role of agents of influence like the late Robert Maxwell and U.S. President Donald Trump working in tandem with Soviet Perestroika initiatives:

“These KGB assets will be used to generate Western support for ‘perestroika’ in the USSR and Eastern Europe and also to prepare a favourable climate for ‘restructuring’ in, and convergence with, the United States, Europe and the Third World…. The ultimate objective is Lenin’s replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘New World Social Order’ – World [Communist] Government…. What the West fails to appreciate is that the motive for doing so and for introducing controlled ‘democracy’ is to stimulate changes in the Western system and to facilitate the convergence of the two systems with a view to the eventual absorption of the Western democracies within a World Government.”[15]

Israel’s use for Perestroika is part of its world governance strategy, which involves the leadership of the rising Eurasian power, or BRICS hierarchy, with the self-proclaimed “chosen people” ruling it all. The Jews call it “olam ha ba”, the world to come—their messianic kingdom on earth with gentiles as their footstool.

No doubt, Maxwell used his vast influence through his media empire not only to portray Israel as the good guy but also to perpetuate the legitimacy of Gorbachev’s perestroika deception. The media, after all, were the Western’ world’s only disseminators of what went on in the Soviet Union. Thomas and Dillon reveal Kryuchkov as saying, “’Comrade Maxwell is going to be a good friend of this country.’ And Maxwell replied that he would be glad to tell the world how much the Soviet Union was changing.”[16] Maxwell would go on to purchase the English-speaking Soviet paper The Moscow News. “The newspaper had been Maxwell’s attempt to embrace the liberating policies of Mikhail Gorbachev. Both saw the newspaper as a means to promote perestroika.”[17]

JULY 1, 1987 – Donald Trump and Ivana visit Palace Square in St. Petersburg, USSR. This is the same year year Trump and Jeffrey Epstein became friends. The Steele dossier alleges that St. Petersburg was another city in which Trump was sexually compromised by Russian kompromat agents. (Photo by Maxim Blokhin / TASS via Getty Images)

Did Maxwell pass on sexual blackmail of Trump to the Soviets?

If Robert Maxwell, or even his daughter Ghislaine, had blackmail material on Donald Trump, either from Jeffrey Epstein’s various Kompromat Klubs or other sources, what are the chances that it was passed on not only to Mossad but also to the Soviets? Perhaps the Mossad originally contracted it out to the Soviets and Maxwell joined the fray later, or Soviet blackmail of Trump may have been a back up to Mossad’s. We may never know. But the highly controversial Christopher Steele dossier tends to corroborate this theory as well as Golitsyn’s perestroika deception hypothesis—something both the Left- and Right-wing media completely ignore. Unforuntately, those on the Right have been kept from reading the dossier by way of deception. They have been told that it was invented by the Democrat Party, which it doesn’t appear to be. The dossier appears to be authentic and is a must read for truth seekers. The Steele dossier discusses Trump’s sexual compromise as taking place in Russia (i.e. “PissGate”), which isn’t hard to believe. It doesn’t say exactly how far back the kompromat of Trump extended, but it’s likely to have gone back many years, as Trump has been involved with the Russians for a long time.

Maxwell’s protege Epstein

Like Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Maxwell was considered a “sexual predator” by at least one lover of his.[18] Also like Ghislaine and Epstein, he was no stranger to bugging. Maxwell had bugged his own offices—even restrooms—at the Daily Mirror in order to snoop on his employees. It seems that Ghislaine sees in Epstein the image of her father. Is this the reason she aids and abets his criminal activities, or is it because as the ringleader, she needs him. Perhaps it’s a little bit of both.

Maxwell a Chabadnik?

In the previous installment of this series, we learned how Soviet power changed only in name—from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to an organized crime syndicate controlled by the Chassidic Jewish Chabad Lubavitch, with which Donald Trump is deeply entagled. Although Maxwell’s upbringing was in a Chassidic Jewish household, there isn’t a lot of evidence linking Maxwell to the Chabadniks. In 2015, Chabad Headquarters published an article linking Maxwell with Chabadnik rabbi Yitzchak (Izzy) Kogan.

“Emotionally difficult though it was, Izzy nevertheless returned to Russia and put his street-smarts to work, negotiating with diplomats and private philanthropists to facilitate the dramatic air-lift of 226 children from the Chernobyl area to Israel. He reached out to Robert Maxwell and Armand Hammer who sent their own aircraft to evacuate the children since Russia refused to provide its own carrier. After several tense days during which the children were kept waiting in the Minsk airport with 400 frustrated parents, they finally arrived in Israel to great fanfare.”[19]

Notes:

[1] On Their Toes, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 17, 1989, pg. 7W.

[2] Graham, Regina F., Donald Trump ‘singled out a ‘young socialite’ at his Mar-a-Lago club and told reporter ‘there is nothing in the world like first-rate p**sy” in interview with defunct golf magazine years before infamous Access Hollywood tape, The Daily Mail, November 29, 2017 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5131173/Trump-comment-p-sy-years-tape.html

[3] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, pages 125 & 39

[4] ibid, pg. 173

[5] ibid, pg. 368

[6] Mystery surrounds tabloid tycoon’s death Maxwell Communication Corporation, Altoona Mirror, Nov. 6, 1991, pg. B8

[7] Verkaik, Robert, The Mystery of Maxwell’s death, The Independent, March 10, 2006 – http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=https%3a%2f%2fwww.independent.co.uk%2fnews%2fuk%2fcrime%2fthe-mystery-of-maxwells-death-469294.html&d=4972289678183054&mkt=en-CA&setlang=en-US&w=-Z2STye4d0XVIvJhZQCaX8JYNB2WNIwM

[8] Yinon, Oded, A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties, translated by Israel Shahak, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.; Belmond, Massachusetts, 1982 – http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33220.htm

[9] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 111

[10] ibid, pg. 112

[11] ibid, pg. 228

[12] Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception: The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 22

[13] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 32

[14] ibid, page 43

[15] ibid, pgs. 43, 66, and 128

[16] ibid, pg. 43

[17] ibid, pg. 167

[18] ibid, pg. 28

[19] Olidort, Baila, PROFILE IN COURAGE: The Tzadik of Leningrad, Chabad Lubavitch Headquarters News, November 2, 2015 – http://lubavitch.com/news/article/2056177/PROFILE-IN-COURAGE-The-Tzadik-of-Leningrad.html

Media’s ‘anti-Russia’ narrative actually helps Soviet strategy

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 14, 2018 Anno Domini

President Vladimir Putin and Russia could not be more pleased with the Western media’s handling of “Russian collusion” in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The message from the mainstream media is clear: Russia helped Trump and the Republicans regain the White House as part of Russia’s reform to nationalism and capitalism. But there is much more to the story that both the mainstream and alternative media are not telling us. It’s true that Russia colluded to get Trump elected but not because of its alleged reform. The truth is, there has been no reform of Sovietism. The fake reform is designed to fool the anti-Communist Right, and the election of a perceived populist president who happens to be in bed with Russia furthers that deception.

What more could the crypto-Communist state of Russia ask for than for Western media to perpetuate the myth that it has long since dumped communism for a capitalist-based economy situated on conservative values as part of its Perestroika (restructuring)? Could there be a better disinformation campaign than this? It may well be that Russia had planned all along to leak and reveal its ties to the Trump presidential campaign in order to produce this result, as well as to demonstrate its control over the White House (former U.S. president Barack Obama is a communist and definitely served Soviet strategic interests. Soviet control over the White House likely goes back to at least Ronald Reagan). This demonstration of control sends a message to NATO and its allies that resistance is futile and that submission to world communist governance is their only option.

For the Left, the media’s Russia narrative sits fine with them, as it justifies their hatred of traditional Western values. It’s a perceived scandal with an effect not unlike that produced by Watergate (capitalists are corrupt and always eventually expose themselves). Little do these poor dupes know, they are being played by a slick Soviet scheme. But perhaps if they knew Russia’s true intentions, they would be fine with it, as the Left has now fully embraced ideological communism. Russia can only be content with the Left’s negative perception of Russia, as it serves as a means to an end. For once Russia finally reveals that it is, indeed, still communist, the Left will reconcile with her. So for now, Russia can continue to throw itself under the bus to work its Left dialectic.

For the Right, the Soviet scheme has achieved a more important goal: it has successfully corralled any and all legitimate opposition to communistic radical Left progressivism and directed in a way that serves Soviet interests—the interest of preparing the world for communistic world governance with Russia and China as its heads. The entire alternative media, without exception, has completely bought the lie and assumed a default position that if the mainstream media is attacking Russia, this, then, must mean that Russia is the good guy—specifically, in the Right’s view, “anti-globalist.” First of all, this line of reasoning is fallacious on logical grounds. You can’t assume a position merely based on a party’s reaction to another party’s action. These same dupes use the same fallacy when assessing President Donald Trump. They try to reason that because Trump is so hated and reviled by the globalist-controlled mainstream media, he must be a good guy. The same illogical reasoning is also blinding the Right about Syria, Iran, and Russia’s role in the Middle East. Mainstream media negatively portrays countries like Syria and Iran; therefore, Syria and Iran must be legitimate anti-globalists and we should support them and anyone who supports them, namely Russia. Forget the long-standing communist pact the USSR has had with Islamic republics. Under the Perestroika deception, those pacts, we subconciously think, have magically dissolved. We are given vague and shallow arguments by the alternative media as to why Russia is “defending” countries like Syria and Iran.

As we can see, the Soviets are playing both the Left and the Right like a pair of cheap fiddles; meanwhile, the Left and the Right are too pre-occupied with fighting each other to bother noticing. It’s a classic divide-and-conquer strategy executed in dialectical fashion by the Judeo-Masonic-Marxist world power. Where we go from here is uncertain. It seems that the Sino-Soviet hierarchy is using co-operation-blackmail on the West: submit to our world government on our terms or face war. The West will not be able to successfully fend off the superior Sino-Soviet military alliance. It has to know this. All it can do is kick and scream until it is finally forced to submit. This may be what we are seeing right now with Trump and all these war-mongering rumours in the media: kicking and screaming, but nothing of actual substance.

Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice run by Kremlin-backed master freemason

Bogdanov in his masonic black and white (dualism) attire.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 27, 2018 Anno Domini

While the West struggles with the growing militancy of social justice in its own lands, a little known organization is bringing the movement back to where it started—Russia…if it ever left in the first place.

What more fitting than for the humanist international masonic brotherhood to be championing it. Forty-eight-year-old Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Russia (Scottish Rite) Andrei Vladimirovich Bogdanov helped found the Communist Party of Social Justice (Коммунистическая партия социальной справедливости) in 2012 (1) as a means for constructing a social state, presumably with social justice as its focus. Of course, the movement and its stated mission assume the narrative that communism and its Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s and Russia became democratized, thus the need for communism to be re-introduced in Russia.

Looking deeper, though, it turns out the entire thing is an elaborate ruse by the crypto-Soviet state to further its Perestroika deception (it’s fake collapse of communism and restructuring to democratization), as revealed by Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. (2)

Russia’s grand master mason is suspected of participating in a false opposition campaign against current Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2008 presidential election in Russia. Putin, who has been in power since 1999, has been viewed by some analysts as routinely setting up strawmen opponents in order to create the illusion of choice and free elections in Russia during his decades-long stay in power (elections require a minimum of two candidates in order to take place). All of this was predicted by Golitsyn in the 1960s and ‘80s.

Bogdanov, who previously handled public relations for Putin’s United Russia Party, denies accusations that he is a Kremlin stooge, even though he also avoids fierce criticism of Putin and praises Dmitry Medvedev (Putin’s planned successor at the time). What’s more, Bogdanov managed to garner 2 million signatures—despite only collecting 89,000 votes for his Democratic Party during the previous parliamentary election—to run as an independent candidate against Putin in the presidential election in March 2008. (3)

In 2013, the Communist Party of Social Justice won one seat in the city Parliament.

Bogdanov not only validates the claim that he is a Putin puppet in the following statement, but he simultaneously furthers the Perestroika deception, which involves a long-range strategy of weakening the West through subversion and psychological warfare.

“Democracy in Russia will be even better than in the United States within two or three, maximum five years.” (4)

The logo for Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice.

Putin’s official opposition is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), the successor to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union (CPSU). It currently has 42 representatives in the State Duma. By contrast, Putin’s United Party has 339. The opposition’s continued existence suggests that, according to Golitsyn’s theory, Putin and his crypto-communist kahal control the opposition as a way of furthering the lie that Russia’s government is opposed to communism and is, instead, democratic. If Russia were truly democratizing, would there a be a communist party at all, much less allowed as the official opposition? You would think that after witnessing all the horrors of communism the new democratic state would have banned communism altogether.

Likewise, the seeming opposition between the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and Bogdanov’s Communist Party of Social Justice appears to be yet another dialectic—a sort of controlled opposition to the controlled opposition, with all three being in on the scam together. The CPRF supposedly has even admitted that Bogdanov’s party is backed by the Kremlin, although it feels Putin backed it in order to steal votes from CPRF. Again, this claim only feeds the Perestroika deception by making it seem that Putin doesn’t want the CPRF (the communists) to win. This is how intricate and complex Soviet strategy is. The West is entirely ignorant of this. But if they simply learned about dialectics (especially dialectics within dialectics), they would begin to understand.

“The deployment of controlled ‘political opposition’ has rendered possible the introduction of deceptive ‘non-Communist’ and ‘democratic’ structures,” warns Golitsyn. “Even so- called free elections do not present a problem for the Communist Parties. Because of their secret partnership with the ‘opposition’, the Communist Parties are always in a winning situation. It is their candidates – Communist or ‘non-Communisf -who always win. No other truly independent candidates exist.”(5)

Golitsyn detailed in his 1988 book, The Perestroika Deception, how the crypto-Soviet state actually embraces the concept of the European Union, as it will make integration between the West and Russia’s world government communistic system that more easy.

Bogdanov hints at this very concept when he told The Moscow Times in 2008, “Russia also needs to join NATO or, rather, merge with a new military block in which only European countries will participate. Russia’s integration into European institutions has been a major theme of his long-shot campaign.” (6) Is this Bogdanov’s idea? No. It comes from the Central Committee and their Perestroika psych warfare division.

Interestingly, with the knowledge that freemasonry helped establish the communist revolution in Russia, Bogdanov appears to corroborate another Golitsyn theory: that the crypto-Soviet state would make superficial concessions to the Russian Orthodox Church in order to further the perception of Russia’s democratization. Bogdanov told The Moscow Times of a church they passed by that was built by a freemason.

Logo for the #1 Harmony Grand Lodge of Moscow. Notice the rotated Jewish hexagram.

“Do you remember a church we passed on the way here, built by the architect Vasily Bazhenov? He was also a Freemason,” he said. “There are Masonic symbols inside, and legend has it that not a single piece of glass was broken there when the church was captured by the French troops and then retaken by the Russians.” (7)

Visit enough Orthodox churches and you will inevitably encounter some of these masonic symbols blasphemously implanted on the iconostasis, in other paintings, and such. Freemasonry played a leading role in the Russian Revolution, as it did in the French Revolution—working side by side with revolutionary Jews.

The masons have always liked the idea of allowing a passive Christianity to exist, so long as they are allowed to infiltrate and run it—the masons’ own false opposition system. And that’s exactly what they did following the revolutions, first with the Catholic Church and now with the Russian Orthodox Church. Both institutions are now completely in the hands of the enemy.

The Russian Orthodox Church not only has masons to contend with but Soviets as well. It is run by mostly “former” Soviet agents, with the Patriarch of Russia, the highest position, being occupied by “former” KGB agent Kirill. Putin and Kirill are both suspected of being freemasons.

This sham Russian revival of Orthodoxy and democracy has fooled the world, especially nationalists in the West. But it’s just another Judeo-masonic trick. Golitsyn said that until Western nationalists give up their failed methods of geo-political analysis, they will never catch on to how the game really works.

Notes:

1. Communist Party of Social Justice – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Social_Justice

2. The Contemplative Observer, Anatoliy Golitsyn: The Key to Understanding Today’s World Situation, Feb. 14, 2013 – https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/anatoliy-golitsyn-the-key-to-understanding-todays-world-situation/

3. Sweeney, Conor, Presidential candidate Bogdanov denies Kremlin ties, January 30, 2008, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-election-bogdanov/presidential-candidate-bogdanov-denies-kremlin-ties-idUSL2949331420080130

4. ibid

5. Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception—The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 87

6. Abdullaev, Nabi, Bogdanov Campaigns With Grandmother, Marc 6, 2008, The Moscow Times, https://web.archive.org/web/20080306090027/http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2008/02/26/003.html

7. ibid

 

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 155-158

The best known Soviet spy in history was the late British turncoat, H. A. R. “Kim” Philby. But “the rest of the story” about Philby’s intrigue was kept under wraps for nearly half a century. The truth is Philby was not just a KGB agent. He was also doubling as an agent for yet another intelligence agency—Israel’s Mossad. Only The Spotlight, the Washington-based populist weekly, told the amazing story—one which points to a “hidden history” of intrigue that has been deliberately suppressed by the “mainstream” media in the West.

In its June 25, 1984 issue, The Spotlight reported on a highly-classified summary of East-bloc espionage operations compiled in April of 1984 by Defense Department analysts. (A copy of that report was provided by well-placed sources to Andrew St. George, the chief diplomatic correspondent for The Spotlight.)

The summary cited several instances when covert agents from the KGB, the Soviet Union’s primary intelligence agency, joined forces with agents of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, to penetrate U.S. targets. Philby was among those who provided aid to the Mossad.

The study revealed that veteran CIA official William King Harvey ran afoul of the KGB and the Mossad as early as 1942 when he concluded a high-level investigation with a report denouncing Philby, then a top British counterintelligence official, as a Soviet“mole,” that is, a long-range covert Soviet penetration agent.

At the time, Philby was serving in Washington as the chief liaison officer between British and American intelligence, giving him access to the U.S. government’s most closely guarded security secrets.
What the other evidence in the Pentagon summary regarding Philby revealed—but which went unreported in all of the “mainstream” media accounts of the Philby affair—was that while Philby was spying for the Soviets, he was also working as an agent for the cause of political Zionism since the early 1940s.

A Russian memorial to British Zionist triple agent Kim Philby, who helped the Soviets.

This was well before the emergence of Israel as a sovereign state and the formation of the Mossad, which, according to former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, functions as “the real engine of policy” in Israel.

The Pentagon report revealed that in 1932, Philby was married in Vienna, Austria to Litzi Friedman, a communist organizer who was also active on behalf of the Zionist cause. Present at the nuptials were several key figures who later assumed leading roles in Israeli espionage. Among them were “Teddy” Kollek, who became much better known as the future longtime mayor of Jerusalem, and Jacob Meridor, one of the founders and directors of the Mossad.

When Harvey exposed Philby as a Red spy, he also cast doubt on Philby’s close friend, James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s director of counterintelligence who was also the CIA’s liaison to the Mossad and a faithful supporter of the Zionist cause.

Angleton and the Mossad felt threatened by Harvey’s unmasking of Philby as a Soviet mole. Soon enough, rumours began to circulate in Washington of Harvey’s “heavy drinking” and “scandalous” behaviour, with the rumours being fed directly to the White House.

In 1967, President Johnson fired Harvey from his CIA post and he retired in disgrace. As The Spotlight put it: “The leading American spymaster of the post-World War II era, who had exposed Philby and other major communist spies, spent his last years working for a publishing company in a dead-end job. He died in 1976 of a heart attack, obscure, poorly paid, and lonely.

(Ironically, in recent years, there was a fraudulent attempt to link Harvey to the JFK assassination, with the outlandish suggestion that Harvey had worked hand-in-glove with his longtime enemy,Angleton, and Angleton’s CIA lieutenants, in arranging the president’s murder. Nothing, could be further from the truth.)

In reality, Harvey was right. Philby was ultimately exposed as a major Soviet penetration agent and ultimately confessed, fleeing to Moscow where he ultimately died.

Today’s Russian president Vladimir Putin, a fake nationalist, is from the KGB mold.

Angleton’s fate was somewhat similar. In a long-suppressed top secret report (which was cited in the Pentagon summary described by The Spotlight), a senior CIA security official, C. Edward Petty, concluded that Angleton may have been a Soviet-Israeli penetration agent while he made his way to the top of the CIA bureaucracy.

The Petty report suggested that Angleton, throughout his career as the dominant figure in U.S. counterintelligence, had slipped vital information to both the Soviet Union and Israel. The report was submitted to President Gerald Ford in April of 1975, but a political decision was made that the evidence was not sufficient to indict and try Angleton, largely because it would have been impossible to stage a public trial of an intelligence official who was privy to as many secrets as Angleton was.

Instead, then-CIA director William Colby fired Angleton, enraging the Israeli lobby which had relied for so long on Angleton’s key placement in the counterintelligence bureaucracy. Angleton retired and died a broken man on May 11, 1987.

On December 14, 1998, The Spotlight was the only newspaper on the planet to publish a suppressed fact about the otherwise widely-publicized secrets about KGB espionage that were revealed with the release of the fabled Soviet diplomatic cables that were secretly decrypted beginning in 1946 by the U.S. Army Signals Security Agency and code-named “Venona.”

Military historian Ulick Steadman described the Venona venture as “an historic achievement,” but noted that there was “a shocking twist.” In fact, a vast majority of the alien agents unmasked by the decoded Soviet cables turned out to be active in Zionist circles rather than merely in the Communist underground. According to H. Dexter Gamage, who served as a Pentagon cryptography analyst, the Venona files revealed that Zionists “made up three-fourths of the enemy spies recruited by the Soviets” in the United States.

As a consequence, at the time the Venona project was under way, Gen. Omar Bradley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ordered the intercepts withheld from President Truman, because—according to Steadman—Bradley was “concerned that anything known to the White House would soon become known to the Zionist insiders [surrounding the president] and subsequently to the Soviets” who would discover that their cables were being intercepted.

Beginning in 1995-1996 portions of the Venona decryptions were finally released to great fanfare. However, significant portions of those long top secret documents have never been released, nor was a list of the Kremlin’s spies, each of whom was identified by name and code name.The identity of those spies is most interesting indeed.

In the original Soviet messages, a large number of operatives were marked with the letter “K” for “KRYSY” (i.e.“Rats”). “KRYSY” was the contemptuous Soviet code designation for the Zionist operatives under its control. In the version of these documents made public in the United States, The Spotlight revealed, the “K” designation was erased before release, reportedly by State Department censors.
A review by The Spotlight’s inimitable Andrew St. George of 35 decoded Soviet messages came up with 20 names of Zionist operatives in Moscow’s service. The same documents revealed only four Communist agents who had no apparent ethnic links to Zionism.

These more recent revelations certainly confirm other evidence we have examined that there really was a split at the highest levels between the Zionists and the Russian nationalists in the USSR during thee final days of the Stalin era and well into the years that followed.

This was a major secret element in the development of the Cold War—a rift that laid the groundwork for the rise of the pro-Zionist “neoconservative” network that has ultimately proven to be one of the most dangerous of America’s Enemies Within.

Until American patriots—real patriots—confront and understand these hidden elements within history, which cast a starkly different perspective on the events of the second half of the 20th century, it will be impossible to begin the process of winning back America—in the 21st century—from the hands of the Judas Goats: The Enemy Within.

The old labels of “liberal” and “conservative” just simply do not apply any more and a lot of the legends of the past—particularly of the Cold War era—must be recognized as precisely that: ‘legends.”

In the chapters that follow, we will examine additional evidence pointing to the role of so-called American “anti-communists” in shifting, bending, distortingm and destroying legitimate anti-communist movements for the benefit of the Zionist agenda.

As we shall see, there is much more to the story of the “McCarthy Era” and the “conservative” forces that began to align in that period than we have been led to believe.

The Little-Understood Struggle Between Stalin-Era Soviet Communism and Zionism

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 144-154

The twin forces of Bolshevism and Zionism have often collaborated on many fronts throughout the 20th century—both alien forces having evolved in the closing years of the 19th century. However,there have been conflicts between the two philosophies that remain little understood even by many who have devoted much study to both forces.

While there are many who view Bolshevism and Zionism as two heads of a single snake (and a two-headed snake does, in fact, exist, as biologists have reported) the realities of 20th century geopolitical struggles suggest that there is much more to the story.

In fact, there were sharp differences between the Russian nationalists (led by Josef Stalin) and the Jewish internationalists led by Stalin’s arch-enemy, Leon Trotsky.

By the time of the Cold War, following the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel in 1948, many traditional Trotskyites began a trans-mogrification process, evolving, particularly in the United States, into the leaders of an anti-Stalinist element that emerged as the hard-line pro- Israel bloc that came to be known as today’s “neo-conservatives.”

This is, of course, a cursory overview of a complicated and often confusing international struggle between revolutionary elements, both of which have been hostile to American interests. A detailed history of this struggle would go far beyond the purview of this volume. However, the fact remains that the modern-day disciples of Trotskyism are key figures among The Enemy Within, twisting old-fashioned conservatism into a divisive and destructive force that is utilizing America’s military might, the blood of its children, and its national treasure to enforce a global Zionist imperium—in short, a New World Order.

At the time of Stalin’s death in 1953—the circumstances of which suggest that he was certainly “helped” to his death—the Soviet leader was becoming openly and actively hostile to political Zionism. According to a July 27, 1967 report published in the American Examiner, the Jewish Telegraph Agency reported that:

Josef Stalin died 14 years ago of a rage caused when the Politburo opposed his proposal that all Russian Jews be expelled to Siberia, The Detroit News has reported from Washington . . . The story alleged that Stalin called a secret Politburo meeting to announce a campaign against the Jews. He said measures should be taken to deport Jews en masse to Biro Bidjan in Siberia . . .

Lazar Kaganovich, [the] only Jewish member of the Politburo and Stalin’s brother-in-law, tore up his party card and threw the pieces in Stalin’s face, said The News.

The report said that Stalin then turned purple with rage . . . Stalin rose from his chair, according to the account, began screaming incoherently and fell unconscious.An hour later, physicians pronounced him dead.

Although this teasingly and provocatively written news report—aimed at Jewish audiences—never said, flat out, that Stalin had been murdered, the intent of the report was very clear: in short, that Zionist interests in Russia had murdered the Soviet strongman because he was planning new offensives against Zionism.

In their 2003 book, Stalin’s Last Crime, Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov published evidence that Stalin was almost certainly murdered in 1953 after he began moving toward exorcising Zionist influence in Soviet circles of power.

Describing Stalin’s moves against the Zionist elements in Russia, Brent and Naumov wrote that if Stalin had not been removed from power,“much subsequent world history might have been quite different.” They added:

Many leading Kremlin figures would have been purged and probably shot; the security services and the military would have been decimated by purges; Soviet intellectuals and artists, particularly Jews, would have been mercilessly suppressed; and the surviving remnant of Soviet and Eastern European Jewry would have been gravely (perhaps mortally) imperiled, while grievous suffering would have been inflicted on all the citizens of the Soviet Union. Another Great Terror, such as occurred in the late 1930s, was averted when Stalin suddenly died on March 5, 1953. Stalin’s version of a “final solution” remained unfulfilled . . .

And although even today there are those—including many legitimate and traditional American anti-communists—who believe Stalin was actually in alliance with Zionist interests, as evidenced by his immediate recognition of the State of Israel, Brent and Naumov comment that in 1948,“The Jews and Israel were not yet the enemies of the Soviet state they soon became.” So the point is this: a very real rift—one long in development—between Stalin and the Zionist (and Trotskyite) elements was very much a reality, popular legend notwithstanding.

In fact, by 1952, when Stalin was intensifying his public (and behind-the-scenes) campaign against Zionism in Russia, Brent and Naumov point out that the irony that many American Jewish spies for the Soviet Union would have found it hard to imagine that they were working for “a country whose leaders soon thereafter would turn against the entire Jewish population of the Soviet Union and, at the high- est governmental levels, was seriously considering the idea of the detention and deportation of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent people.”

In fact, in the Jan/Feb 2003 issue of The Barnes Review—the Revisionist history journal published by Willis A. Carto—Russian nationalist historian, Dr.OlegPlatonov, offered readers a fascinating history of Russia’s historic troubles with Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Bolshevik agitation—the proverbial two-headed snake. Platonov, asserted, flat-out, that Stalin had indeed launched a major offensive against Zionism.The words of Platonov, one of the leading Russian intellectuals today, and who is in the forefront of the fight against Zionist influence in 21st Century Russia, are worth reviewing. Platonov wrote:

The Jewish-Bolshevik rule over Russia was broken by Stalin who, in the second half of the 1930s, carried out a counter-revolution and stripped the carriers of the Zionist ideology of their power. In the 1930s and 1940s, no less than 800,000 Jewish Bolsheviks were annihilated under the leadership of Stalin—the elite of the anti-Russian organization which had planned to transform Russia into a Jewish state. Nearly all Jewish leaders were purged, and the chances of the remaining ones to regain power were reduced to a minimum.The last years of Stalin’s life were dedicated to the uprooting of Zionism and the liquidation of the organizations associated with it.

Dr. Platonov added these highly relevant details:

After Stalin’s death, everything changed abruptly. The state was taken over by people bent on the restoration of Jewish Bolshevism . . .The renaissance of Zionism continued during the entire government of N. S. Khruschev.

The situation somewhat improved under Brezhnev, who secretly limited the number of Jews in government positions. As a matter of fact, these measures were rarely put into practice, and both secret and open Zionists found many ways to elude them.

From the 1950s to the 1970s, a powerful fifth column spearheaded by the carriers of the Zionist ideology arose in Russia. Many of its leading figures were sons or grandsons of Bolshevik revolutionaries.

These very people later became the most active elements of the so-called perestroika, which led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the assumption of political power by the Jews and the transfer of a considerable part of Russia’s national wealth to foreign countries.

Today, of course, the fight against Zionist influence in Russia has expanded considerably, and Russia’s current president,Vladimir Putin, is increasingly under the gun from American-based (and worldwide) Zionist elements who view the so-called“Russian strongman”as a potential threat. (In a later chapter, we’ll discuss Putin further.)

The point that we need to focus on—and which must be emphasized—is that the break between Stalin and the Zionists, which began in the 1930s and which reached a fever pitch at the time of Stalin’s assassination in 1953, led specifically to events in the United States which played a major part in behind-the-scenes intrigue in the so-called “Cold War.“ This led to the establishment of the power bloc that today—in the 21st century—is known as the “neo-conservative” movement: that is, the Zionist-Trotskyite globalist warmongers who are using the wealth and power of the United States to enforce their world imperium.

In 1914, no less than V. I. Lenin wrote of Trotsky:“Comrade Trotsky has never yet possessed a definite opinion on any single, earnest Marxian question: he has always crept into the breach made by this or that difference, and has oscillated from one side to another.” And this reflects precisely the way so many American Trotskyites—who became the neo-conservatives—actually shifted their own agenda in order to fit with the times, particularly as elements within the Soviet government continued, behind the scenes, to agitate against Zionist influence.

So although many American anti-communists (and outright anti- Zionists and anti-Semites) were caught up in the theory that Soviet Communism (even under Stalin) had been largely a “Jewish” project, so to speak, there were a few discerning voices who recognized that the fight between Stalin and Trotsky had a definitive“Jewish slant”that need- ed to be examined in careful context.

In the late 1950s, John H. Monk, the American nationalist and frankly anti-Semitic editor of the Texas-based journal, Grass Roots, published a remarkable essay entitled “Let Us Look Into This Thing Called ‘Trotsky Communism.’” He concluded after an extensive review of the history of the conflict between Stalin and Trotsky that, put simply: “Trotsky Communism and Soviet Communism are enemies.” In Soviet Russia, as Monk noted, beginning in the late 1930s, “top ranking Jews began at that time toppling from their high seats,” and that “Russia at last had gotten her eyes open [and that] the good work started in 1928 with the exiling of Trotsky” by Josef Stalin. He added, quite pointedly:

Just recently, the Anti-Defamation League issued a special bulletin in which it wept sorely because the Russian Jews used to fill, back in 1935, ten percent of the high seats in the empire, and now they have only “one half of one per- cent” and it is shaky. No wonder the American Jew-Trotsky gang invented the slogan:“Down with Communism!”They mean Russia.

Monk pointed out that the Zionist movement and affiliated groups such as the ADL had quickly aligned themselves with the Trotskyite movement that set up shop in the United States—in New York City in particular—upon Trotsky’s exile from Russia.“If we run with the Trotsky Communist slogan, ‘Down with the Communists,” we automatically become partisans of the filthiest underground that has ever existed any- where on this earth:Trotsky Communism.”

Monk’s essays on this controversial topic were even reprinted by famed Lyrl Clark Van Hyning in her popular Women’s Voice newsletter, which no one ever accused of being a “communist” journal.

On September 15, 1969, writing in the popular American nationalist newspaper, Common Sense, which had, over the years, frequently featured the works of outspoken Jewish-born American anti-Zionist spokesman Benjamin Freedman, one Morris Horton (under his pen name “Fred Farrell”) wrote a fascinating assessment of the reality of Trotskyite Communism. Horton wrote in part:

Originally “Communism” was nothing but a tool of the wealthy American Jews of New York. In the United States, and in much of the rest of the world, it is still just that. Let us now address ourselves to a question important to anyone who really wants to understand Communism:“What is the difference between a Stalinist and a Trotskyite? Some people will tell you:“All Communists are alike.”

This is a dangerous piece of shallow misinformation. It is acceptable only if you are willing to substitute shallow sloganeering for real knowledge.A Stalinist represents primordial Russian nationalism. A Trotskyite represents the Jewish interests of New York City. The Jewish interests of New York suffered a terrific setback one day many years ago, when a taciturn hood planted an ax in Leon Trotsky’s skull in a villa in Mexico.

The world Communist conspiracy is not a Russian conspiracy; it is an American Jewish conspiracy.Today it is falling into great disrepute around the world. America is being blamed for supporting communism around the world. Unhappily, the charge is true. New York is the real hub of the conspiracy. If some of our Anti-Communists would stand up four square and tell this plain truth, we might possibly yet be liberated from Jewish misrule. Few of them ever do.

Most of the Communists and many of the Anti- Communists are on the same payroll, the Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other.The first basic rule of this sham battle is:“Never drag any real truth into the matter on either side; tell anything else you want to tell, but never tell the truth.” This is the basic background of most of the phony “experts” on Communism who have been “experting” about it for forty years and haven’t made a dent in it.

Horton was particularly adamant in pointing out that the American “anti-Communist” movement was increasingly falling into the hands of very real Communists—the Trotskyites—who in the guise of “fighting Communism” were actually working to introduce it into the American system.This is a point that few anti-communists understood then and even today they find it difficult to digest. Horton wrote:

These people generate the literature on Communism that is generally available to the American public.They have no interest in providing any genuinely valid information. Their aim is to manipulate public opinion.

Therefore, they seek to divide the Gentile.They seek to make the middle class believe that the working class is allied to Red Russia; All of this is, and always was, pure hallucination, generated by Jewish intellectual quacks in order to pro- mote a minority tyranny over the American Majority.

In his essay, Horton emphasized that the age-old labels of “Right” and “Left” no longer had any real meaning—a point that even many legitimate and self-styled modern-day American “conservatives” of the 21st century have yet to realize:

There is no genuine validity in either the “Right” or “Left” positions in politics. These are artificial, Jew-invented positions. Jewish control of communications is absolutely essential to the success of this power system. Jewish political quackery would not long survive exposure.

The Right-Left Age is the Jewish Age, and it is an age which, on the world stage, is now receding into the past. If America continues to live in this Jewish past, then America has no future.

Horton’s words—written nearly 50 years ago—continue to reverberate. But to drive home the point further, it is worth reviewing a trans- lation of an analysis of Zionism published in Spanish in the November 4, 1979 edition of Granma, the official newspaper voice of the communist regime of Cuba’s Fidel Castro.

(Similar versions of this had previously appeared in the Soviet Union, at a time when there were increasing public noises against Zionism, much to the dismay of the American Trotskyites who were then reinventing themselves as “the neo-conservatives.”

While this analysis from the communist point of view has been superceded by the collapse of the Soviet empire as it existed when this document was first published, it contains fascinating insights into the sources of tension between Zionism and Communism.

The Zionist movement, created by the Jewish big bourgeoisie at the end of the 19th century, was born with a decidedly counterrevolutionary purpose. From the founding of the World Zionist Organization in 1897 to the present, Zionism, as ideology and political practice, has opposed the world revolutionary process.

Zionism is counterrevolutionary in a global sense in that it acts the world over against the three major forces of revolution: the socialist community, the working class movement in capitalist countries and the movement for national liberation.

Zionist counterrevolution began by making inroads in the European working class movement. In the early years, when the growth of monopoly capitalism and the expansion of reactionary tendencies that accompanied the establishment of the imperialist phase of capitalism demanded the unity and solidarity of the proletariat, the Zionists focused on dividing the working class.

They propagated the thesis that all non-Jews were, and would always be, anti-Semites; asserted that the only possi- bility for the Jewish masses’ well-being and justice was to emigrate to the “promised land”; and defended class collaboration, thus diverting the Jewish proletariat away from the struggle for their real emancipation and dividing and weak- ening the working class movement. It’s not fortuitous that in czarist police archives one finds documents calling for sup- port for the Zionist movement as a way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution.

Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote at the time in his diary:“All our youth; all those who are from 20 to 30 years old, will abandon their obscure socialist tendencies and come over to me.”

However, the efforts of Zionist counterrevolution could not hold back the wheels of history.The victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia ushered in a period of transition from capitalism to socialism on a world scale. The first victory of the proletariat, the premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.

Most of the money that filled Zionist coffers came from Russia, where czarism had humiliated and oppressed the Jews for centuries. Russia provided a million immigrants for the Zionist colonization of Palestine. When the Russian Revolution liquidated the exploitation of man by man, it also destroyed the basis for Zionism in the Soviet Union.

Leninist policy on the national question toppled all Zionist myths that the Jews could not be fully incorporated, with equal rights, into society and destroyed all the racist claims on the inevitability of anti-Semitism. The Zionists never did, and never will, forgive the Soviet state and its Leninist Party, not so much for cutting off the money flow from Russia and for the loss of workers for the colonization effort, but because the Bolsheviks implemented a correct policy that incorporated the talents and efforts of the Soviet Jews into the tasks of building a new society and thus demonstrated the class origins of discrimination and anti-Semitism, breaking with the past and providing a genuine solution to the Jewish problem, a solution which was not and could never be a massive exodus to Palestine.

Zionist counterrevolution took on an anti-Soviet thrust. Before October 1917 the Zionists collaborated with Kerensky. Later they supported all the attempts at counter- revolution and enthusiastically participated in the different white “governments” set up in different parts of the country during the Civil War [in Russia]. They were active in all the moves against the Soviet Union from abroad, and their powerful propaganda machine spread a spate of lies about the first workers’ and peasants’ state in the world.

Not even the Soviet victory over German fascism, which saved so many Jewish lives, made the Zionists change their anti-Soviet stand.

With the outbreak of the cold war the Zionists collaborated in all the subversive and diversionary activities against the USSR and other socialist countries. The secret services of the Zionist state of Israel coordinated their spy activities with the CIA. Zionist agents played an active role in the counter-revolutionary attempts in Hungary and Czechoslovakia.

Today Zionism seconds the hypocritical anti-Soviet campaign on presumed violations of the human rights of Jews in the Soviet Union and does all it can to put pressure on Soviet citizens of Jewish origin so they will leave their true homeland and go to Israel.This effort by Zionist counterrevolution can only lead to new failures. And to complete the picture there is the Zionist counterrevolutionary action against the national liberation movements.

Soon after World War I, Zionist settlers penetrated into Palestinian territory, acting as the spearhead of British imperialist interests in opposition to the Arab peoples’ hopes for independence. Their role was clearly spelled out by the prominent Zionist leader Max Nordau in a statement to the British authorities:

“We know what you want from us: that we defend the Suez Canal.We must defend your route to India which pass- es through the Middle East.We are ready to take on that difficult task. But you must allow us to become powerful enough to carry out that task.”

And, as a matter of fact, the Zionists became a power and succeeded in establishing their own state in 1948: the Zionist state of Israel. Now their task is to defend oil routes, protect all the interests of U.S. imperialism and block the advance of the Arab revolution.

Backed by tremendous amounts of imperialist economic and military aid, the Zionists are constantly acting against national liberation movements.

At one time it was their mission to penetrate African and Asian independence movements, guarantee that the newly independent states followed paths acceptable to imperialism, that they not stray from the confines of neocolonialism. Israel offered courses, advisers, all sorts of aid.

But the ploy wasn’t very successful. Israel’s increasing role as imperialism’s policeman in the Middle East, its racism and avowed expansionism made the young African and Asian nations see the dangers of Israeli“aid,”the treachery of Israeli foreign policy.

Nevertheless, the Zionist state took up a new role in the struggle of world reaction against progress. It went beyond the geographical confines of the Middle East, estab- lished friendly ties with all reactionary regimes and began to supply arms,equipment and advisers to those who were trying to suppress national liberation struggles.

The Israeli armaments industry specialized in designing and producing all sorts of weapons for urban and rural anti-guerrilla warfare.

The South African racist regime, the dictatorships of Guatemala and El Salvador, and the fascist Pinochet are among the best clients of the Israeli armaments industry. Israeli arms sales in 1978 were estimated at $400 million. One of their best clients was the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.

Zionist counterrevolution was present in Somoza’s Nicaragua in the form of Galil guns and Pull-push planes, but they couldn’t stop the victory of the Sandinista revolutionaries.

This is a symbol of our times: neither the machinations of Zionist counterrevolution, nor Israeli arms, can hold back the victorious march of the peoples of the world.

(END OF THE GRANMA ARTICLE)

Whatever one thinks of Fidel Castro or of former Soviet leader Josef Stalin, the fact is that there has long been a very real split between the Trotskyites—who have (in the leadership level of the “neo-conservative” network in the United States) evolved into the tribunes of the global Zionist movement—and the nationalistically-oriented elements led in Russia by Stalin following his consolidation of power.

To understand these nuances and to recognize the part they have played in shaping the events of the last half of the 20th century it is vital to understand how and why The Enemy Within has been able to manipulate the traditional cause of“anti-communism”and bend it into a mechanism for the Zionist cause.

Where there are a few insignificant Trotskyite movements—rag-tag bands of street agitators and others—who continue to operate quite independently of (and often in opposition to) the neo-conservative Zionists, it is those “neo-conservatives” who have wrapped themselves in the American flag who are the real Enemy Within.

And in light of all this, it’s no coincidence that in Russia today, both traditional Communists (many of whom revere the memory of Josef Stalin) and anti-Communists are united in their opposition to Zionism and Jewish plutocratic power.

In the chapter which follows, we will examine some remarkable historical facts which underscore the reality of the split between the Stalinists and the Zionist Trotskyites, and will further clarify the nature of the modern-day Enemy Within.