Central importance of Sun-Tzu’s ‘Art of War’

By Christopher Story
July 15, 2019 Anno Domini

Excerpted from Christopher Story’s The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States (1997),  pgs. 56-59

The blindness of the West, and its arrogant assumption that ‘we won the Cold War’ particularly reconfirms the timeless effectiveness of the advice given by the ancient Chinese military strategist, Sun-Tzu, in his treatise entitled ‘The Art of War’: ‘Pretend inferiority and encourage your enemy’s arrogance’ . It is known that ‘The Art of War’ was required reading in the East German and Soviet armed forces. As Anatoliy Golitsyn explains in New Lies for Old: “The ancient Chinese treatise on strategy and deception, Sun -Tzu’s The Art of War, translated into Russian by N.I. Konrad in 1950 (shortly after the Communist victory in China), was retranslated into German in 1957 by the Soviet specialist Y. I. Sidorenko, with a foreword by the Soviet military strategist and historian General Razin. It was [also] published in East Germany by the East German Ministry of Defense and was prescribed for study in East German military academies: [see facsimile on page 57]. A new translation and other studies of Sun-Tzu were published in Peking in 1957 and 1958 and in Shanghai in 1959. Mao Tse-Tung is known to have been influenced by Sun-Tzu in his conduct of the civil war”.

Illusions such as those dispensed by the author of the article cited above from “The Times’ of London are fostered by, and depend upon, the continued success of the Russian ‘weak look’ strategic deception – which is based upon the practical applic- ation in modern conditions of Sun-Tzu’s military deception aphorisms:

Statue of Sun-Tzu

‘All warfare is based on deception’.

‘Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity’.

‘When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near’.

‘Offer the enemy a bait to lure him; feign disorder and strike him’. ‘Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance’.

‘Keep him under strain and wear him down’.

‘When he is united, divide him’.

‘Attack the enemy’s strategy’.

‘Disrupt the enemy’s alliances’.

‘If I am able to determine the enemy’s dispositions while at the same time I conceal my own, then I can concentrate and he must divide. And if I concentrate while he divides, I can use my entire strength to attack a fraction of his’.
‘Make the devious route the most direct and turn misfortune to advantage’.

‘The ultimate in disposing one’s troops is to be without ascertainable shape. Then the most penetrating spies cannot pry in, nor can the wise lay plans against you’.

‘Subtle and insubstantial, the expert leaves no trace; divinely mysterious, he is inaudible. Thus he is master of his enemy’s fate’ .

‘Active measures’ operations against Western leaders

The successful implementation, through the creative (Leninist) application of Sun-Tzu’s teachings and complementary Leninist dialectical strategic deception principles, of the inverted pyramid of lies called ‘perestroika’, is all the more remarkable in that, as has been shown, absolutely faithful adherence to Leninist revolutionary methods had repeatedly been asserted in public by the Communist leaders and the 1991 that she had concluded that ‘Gorbachev isn’t a Leninist any more’ – merely weeks before Gorbachev and the KGB executed the biggest and boldest Leninist Bolshevik provocation to date: the fake August coup. Prominent among the planners and implementers of this provocation was the KGB veteran Yevgeniy Primakov, a leading KGB strategist, who flew back to Moscow late in the evening of 19th August, thus conveying the impression that he had not been involved – yet issued a statement on the following day asserting that Gorbachev was not ill but was being held captive.

Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev shakes hands with Lady Thatcher during a meeting in Lord Powell’s office in London, Wednesday October 19, 2005. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Photo credit should read: Michael Stephens/PA (Photo by Michael Stephens – PA Images/PA Images via Getty Images)

The Soviets have even gone so far as to hint in public that both the British Prime Minister and President Reagan were the target of ‘active measures’ operations by Soviet intelligence ahead of the controlled ‘Break with the Past’. The nature of these ‘active measures’ is not known (although in Mrs. Thatcher’s case, the murder shortly before she came to office in 1979 of her intelligence adviser, Airey Neave, in a car bomb placed in the House of Commons car park, may have been an element of them – since Neave was well equipped to warn her against being taken in by the Soviets); but ‘active measures’ covers everything from the fabrication of forgeries to the administration of mind-altering psychotropic drugs, to sexual allure or entrapment, to assassination.

It is the Author’s view that analysts have overlooked one important reason why Gorbachev was selected by the Kremlin’s strategy collective as General Secretary following a prolonged period of apparent infighting which resulted in Gorbachev’s alleged rival, Grigory Romanov, being expelled from the Kremlin in the summer of 1985, framed as an alcoholic (which he was not) and forcibly confined to a hospital for alcoholics [see pages XXXX-XXXXII]. This is that he possesses what can only be described as a kind of demonic sexual allure: and the strategists’ key target at the time was Mrs. Thatcher. She immediately fell for Gorbachev’s ‘charms’, notwithstanding his boorish behaviour during his visit to London in late 1984, described on pages 17- 18. The Author is personally acquainted with two American women, not known to each other, each of whom has separately testified to Gorbachev’s sexual magnetism, which the late Malachi Martin described as being sinister. (One of these women also testifies to the near-freezing temperature immediately surrounding the person of MVD General Eduard Shevardnadze, reported on page 49; but the other lady is not one of the two who have separately experienced that distsurbing phenomenon).

On 19th February 1991, ‘Izvestia’ reported that ‘in the United States and Britain, “Active Measures” against President Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher had limited success’ . The inclusion of the qualification ‘limited’ here should perhaps be disregarded: the proper translation of this statement from the Aesopian language used by ‘Izvestia’ is that the operations were successful. The fact that they were mounted, and have even been openly acknowledged, is of course significant enough.

Mrs Thatcher failed to understand that she had been duped by Mr Gorbachev, as she made clear to the author in July 1991. During an interview in which the Author explained details of the Soviet ‘bilateral treaty offensive’ and spoke of Golitsyn’s work, which the former Prime Minister dismissed, Mrs [now Lady] Thatcher not only remarked: ‘I don’t think Gorbachev is a Leninist any more’, but also added the following corollary: ‘I don’t think we have been deceived—at least, I hope we haven’t’ [see page 19]. As the Author wrote in the Editor’s Foreword to Golitsyn’s book The Perestroika Deception, this qualifying afterthought clearly implied ‘a niggling doubt that the West might indeed have fallen victim to Soviet strategic deception’. Necessarily, by then the consequences of Lady Thatcher’s mistakes were crowding in on the West like a gigantic thunderstorm. But if she had entertained such doubts while still in power, it was surely her duty to have had them investigated.

That failure was undoubtedly Lady Thatcher’s worst: and the Author has elsewhere described the British Prime Minister’s careless accommodation of Gorbachev and all his Leninist lies as ‘a millennial strategic error’. A second strategic error of comparable proportions concerned Europe: though troubled by the implic- ations of the ‘European project’, she pushed through the 1986 Single European Act which paved the way for the Collective’s Maastricht Treaty. In the end, she became an enthusiastic supporter of the Leninist deception strategy of ‘convergence’. She had already permitted her Foreign Secretary Sir Geoffrey Howe , to go along with the Foreign Office’s plan to hand the priceless capitalist jewel of Hong Kong over to the Communist Chinese, a grand betrayal which could hardly have been urged upon her other than by forces aware of the ‘convergence’ framework and agenda. Lady Thatcher’s most recently monitored geopolitical stance is that ‘Russia isn’t a threat any more’—just as ‘Gorbachev isn’t a Leninist any more’.

The Perestroika Deception: Behind the Mask – part I

Putin is a proven fraud and communist, Russia and China in final preparations for military conquest of the West

By ‘Child of the Immaculata’ Apocalypse 12:17
July 7, 2019 Anno Domini

A truly peaceful nation does not speak and act in warrior terms. Although the East expends much effort in pretence of virtue, in script of the long-range communist deception strategy or ‘Perestroika Deception’, as revealed (with a predictive success of 94%) by Soviet defector Mr Anatoliy Golitysn (1), the mask slips. This is unavoidable, because as Our Blessed Lord said in Divine wisdom:

“For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh……….By their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 12:34-35 & 7:16)

Accordingly, Putin in clearly presaged delectation of Western conquest and the ravages of war, told Western journalists in 2008 that their wives should learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup’:

“He told Western observers who refused to monitor the forthcoming election, widely seen as a sham, that they should ‘
rather teach their own wives how to cook cabbage soup.’ (2)
In 2016, he revealed his true communist credentials, in declaring his like of communist and socialist doctrine:

‘You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,’ Putin said, referring to the KGB ‘
I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity’ he said. “I liked communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”(3)
 
Also in 2016, Putin made public evangelisation illegal.(4) Mr. Hannu Haukka, President of Great Commission Media Ministries, said, “This new situation resembles the Soviet Union in 1929. At that time, confession of faith was permitted only in church.”

And in 2018, in further affirmation that his apparent ‘Christianity’ is totally fake (5), he compared the mausoleum of Lenin with a Christian relic: “Putin went further by comparing the Communists’ attitude to the Bolshevik leader Lenin to the veneration of saints in Christianity. ‘Look, Lenin was put in a mausoleum.How is this different from the relics of saints for Orthodox Christians and just for Christians?”(6)

Putin’s words were music to the ears of Communist Party members. ‘I think these words of the president very effectively and reasonably smooth out the acute angles around the theme of the mausoleum’, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Ivan Melnikov said on Sunday, as cited by Interfax.

Earlier this year, Gennadiy Zyuganov, the head of the Russian Communist Party, said Putin had promised him that as long as he remains president, Lenin’s body would remain in the mausoleum in Red Square.

“As long as I sit here, there will be no barbarism in Red Square’ the Communist chief quoted Putin as saying at a conference with Russian party leaders.”

The fundamental identity of communism is hatred of God, externalised in violence, destruction, death and enslavement of men. As Marx said in excerpt of his poems:

I have power within my youthful arms
To clench and crush you with tempestuous force.
See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me.
 
If there is a something which devours, 
I’ll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins.
The world which bulks between me and the abyss,
I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly,
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action,

My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

 
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.(7) 

In his annual Presidential address on 1st March 2018, Putin displayed aggressive flex of Russian (ie. Soviet) ‘tempestuous force’ and ‘fire and action’. He said, ‘It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen to us now!”

For almost an hour in this speech, we see a peacock show of weaponry (from 1 hr 15 m 15 s). Note also that the delivery aircraft for his new ‘dagger’ missile system has the Soviet 5 pointed red-star on the tail-fin! (1 hr 38 m 21 s) And of course, his speech was inter-laced with the usual anti-Western propaganda and characterisation of the US especially, as aggressor.


The communist show of military might was the mark of the Soviets, before they implemented the ‘Perestroika Deception’. And as we see in their ‘victory day’ celebrations in Red Square this year, the same is true today (note the prominent hammer and sickle emblem in the lead photo of this article). Watch the a 17 minute video in reference (8). The fundamental to the whole parade was simply virulent military power.

What about Russia’s ally China? We see here  Karl Marx’s 200th birthday as celebrated in 2018 by the Chinese regime. In the forefront President Xi, who as with Gorbachev, has been cast in his role in deceit of his ‘avuncular’ appearance.

In January 2018, they conducted an ostentatious exercise in display of their military strength. (9) Ominously, Xi stated that the military should:
“create an elite and powerful force that is always ready for the fight, capable of combat and sure to win in order to fulfil the tasks bestowed by the Partyand not to fear death.”

Anatoliy Golitysn warned that alliance between Russia and China, is the final step before communist confrontation of the West:

‘Before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favour. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet “reconciliation.” The element of apparent duality in Soviet and Chinese policies will disappear. The hitherto concealed coordination between them will become visible and predominant. The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of one clenched fist to provide the foundation and driving force of a world communist federation. At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable.(10)

It is clear we have reached this stage!

September 2018

‘Russia has launched what it has called its largest ever military drills, with hundreds of thousands of troops joining Chinese soldiers.

Taking part in the drills are around 300,000 Russian soldiers, 36,000 military vehicles, 80 ships and 1,000 aircraft, helicopters and drones, as well as 3,500 Chinese troops.’ (10)

June 2019

‘Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping. Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin praised their countries’ ties during talks at the Kremlin, as Russia and China seek to shore up cooperation amid shared tensions with the United States.’President Putin is for me a best friend.’ Xi told journalists.’ (11)

Conclusion:

For those hood-winked that Putin is a virtuous Christian, then this falsehood is annulled in evidence above. His pretence of apparent ‘Christianity’ is faked to deceive the West, concomitant with the strategy to denigrate the West as evil and exalt the East in virtue, in self-justification for their pending attack on the West. Note there was no mention of God in his 2018 Presidential address. Only a display of hard military power for his communist audience, who in some cases exhibited frissons of exultation as Putin unveiled the new power of the Soviet fist. This is their first measure of national pride!

The ‘East good/West bad’ propaganda strategy has been revealed by Putin’s close confidante Alexander Dugin (12) of whom we should note, was condemned by the Russian Orthodox Church as a disciple of the satanist Aleister Crowley (12a) It has also been admitted by Margarita Simonyan, who is the the head of the media propaganda organ RT (13).

The truth of Putin is exposed by Sacred Scripture:

“For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)

Indeed, Putin as chief administrator of the ‘Perestroika Deception’, stands ready to destroy 5000 years of Western civilisation and take billions of lives. He is an anti-christ of the first grade and an acolyte of the communist ‘saint’ Lenin. As the Hungarian communist Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner (d. 1944) wrote in a poem; (14) THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN! LENIN! Gorbachev stated in a speech on the 15th November 1989 – SIX DAYS AFTER THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL; (15)

“We are for Lenin who is alive!” In order to achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society.

Well, the new society they intend is technocratic, communist enslavement for the entire world!

As Anatoliy Golitsyn said: ‘In the new worldwide communist federation the present different brands of communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism.’

So help us God!

In part 2, we will examine the East’s strategy of conquest for the West. Again, please distribute this information and in personal sacrifice of your reputation to a blinded world, if needs be. God gives much grace for such sacrifice (Mark 3:21).

 

References:

1)  Soviet analyst Mr Christopher Story (RIP) – video expounding Soviet multi-decade communist deception strategy.

‘The Perestroika Deception’ by Mr Anatoliy Golitsyn.

https://www.chinhnghia.com/GOLITSYN(Anatoliy)-Perestroika_Deception_(1998).pdf

2) Putin tells Western wives to learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup.’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578802/Vladimir-Putins-nuclear-threat-to-the-West.html

3) Putin still likes communist and socialist ideas very much.

https://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

4) Putin signs law banning evangelism outside of churches.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/thousands-fasting-after-russian-president-putin-signs-law-banning-evangelism-outside-of-churches.html

5) Article Fitzpatrick Informer – Putin is a fake christian.

https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/sanhedrin-addresses-putin-as-jewish-king/

6) Putin compares mausoleum of Lenin with a christian relic.

https://www.rt.com/news/415883-putin-communist-ideology-christianity/

https://www.rt.com/russia/398319-putin-promised-to-keep-lenin/

7) Poetry of Karl Marx

https://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/marx.htm

8) Soviet ‘Victory Day’ parade 2019 – note at 10 m 49s, a young girl waving a Soviet flag and with a hammer and sickle brooch on her hat!

9) China war preparations.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2018/jan/04/xi-jinping-chinese-army-to-strengthen-war-preparedness-video

10) Anatoliy Golitysin – Russia/China ‘one-clenched fist’ strategy.

The Clenched Fist—Revisiting Golitsyn’s Predictions

11) Russia conducts largest ever military exercise with China.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/11/russia-largest-ever-military-exercise-300000-soldiers-china

11) Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping.

12) Alexander Dugin – ‘to gain victory over the US in the coming ‘Great War’ is to use its vast media operations and assets in the alternative media to portray America as irredeemably evil.’

Dugin’s Published Plan to Destroy the West

12a) Dugin recites praises to satan from text of satanist Aleister Crowley.

13) RT’s chief editor, Margarita Simonyan, has said that the network she manages is like ‘a defence ministry’ and capable of ‘conducting information war against the whole Western world.’

RT Forces Employees to 20 years of Silence

14) Communist, freemason and Jew Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner – THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN ! LENIN!

https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter4.html

15) Gorbachev speech – ‘We are for a Lenin who is alive!’

https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/category/forward-not-back/

Fitzpatrick & Martinez – The Martinez Perspective – Podcast #2

On this episode of The Martinez Perspective I spoke with brilliant researcher Timothy Fitzpatrick of the Fitz Informer. We mainly discussed the Russian/Kremlin infiltration and hostile takeover of the “alternative media,” which seems to be little more than a disinformation machine for the KGB. We also spoke about how the Soviet Union cultivated the anti-Zionist movement as controlled opposition to Jewish power, as a means to mobilize Arabs and Muslims as attack dogs against the West. The Jewish power elite don’t see Muslims as serious competitors, but merely as a low-brow, and low-IQ, nuisance inhibiting their goals in the Middle East. It is whites who present the real threat to their power, hence the all-out assault on white countries and cultures by cultural marxists. Also discussed is how the Soviet Union and Marxism spawned feminism, and how modern Russia’s “traditionalist” persona is a ruse to confuse and ultimately recruit Western nationalists as “useful idiots” for the Kremlin and its interests.

The Martinez Perspective – Podcast #2

Download here

‘Russian Orthodox’ KGB patriarch Kirill says Muslims worship same god as Christians

MOSCOW, RUSSIA – MAY 24, 2019: Gennady Zyuganov (L), Chairman of the Russian Federation Communist Party (KPRF), congratulates Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia on his name day, Saints Cyril and Methodius Day. Valery Sharifulin/TASS (Photo by Valery SharifulinTASS via Getty Images)

Eighty-five-year-old schemamonk Elder Raphail of Mount Athos warns the flock of the KGB (FSB), ecumenical, and masonic tyranny of the Soviet-controlled Moscow Patriarchate of Eastern Orthodoxy, with footage of “Patriarch” Kirill stating that Muslims, Christians, and Jews all worship the same god. Kirill is a KGB agent, suspected mason, and champion of the ecumenical World Council of Churches.

The ‘August coup’ hoax that legitimized the fake collapse of communism

Moscow. The 19th of August 1991. Boris Yeltsin addresses people from the top of a tank. Photo TASS / Valentin Kuzmin; Alexander Chumichev (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
June 22, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 137-144 (1998)

THE FAKE ‘AUGUST COUP’ AND ITS CALCULATED FAILURE

A deliberately engineered ‘Break with the Past’

Who called the shots in the USSR before the ‘coup’ and who introduced the ‘reforms’? Gorbachev and his ‘liberals’? NO, the Party and its strategists.

Who is calling the shots now and who proposed the coup to replace Gorbachev? The ‘hardliners’, the Minister of Defence and the Chief of the KGB? NO, the Party and its strategists.

The ‘coup’ was proposed in accordance with the requirements of the Soviet strategy of convergence leading to eventual World Government. This strategy and its moves, like the present Soviet ‘coup’, can only be understood in the light of the theories of one of the principal Soviet agents of influence, namely Sakharov, and his timetable for convergence. According to Sakharov, during the first phase the Leninist realists (i.e. Gorbachev and other ‘liberals’) will expand and strengthen ‘democracy’ and economic reform in the USSR and other socialist countries.

As we know, this has already happened.

According to Sakharov, in the second phase the pressure exerted by the Soviet example and by the internal progressive forces would lead to the victory of the Leftist Reformist Wing (the Soviet term for American liberals) which would begin to implement a programme of collaboration and convergence with the USSR on a worldwide scale, entailing changes in the structure of ownership. According to Sakharov, this phase would include an expanded role for the intelligentsia and an attack on the forces of racism and militarism.

We had reached this phase before the war with Iraq. In the assessment of the Soviet strategists, the US victory over Iraq adversely affected the political balance in the United States. In their view, the victory weakened and demoralised the liberals (or Leftist Reformists) and strengthened the centrist and conservative forces and the US military. This disturbed Soviet plans to carry out their strategy of convergence.

They saw that their main political allies in achieving convergence with the United States had been weakened. Accordingly they engineered this strategic ‘coup’ to reverse and improve the political fortunes of their American allies. Seen in strategic terms, the main purpose of Gorbachev’s ‘dismissal’ is further to confuse American opinion and to alter the political landscape in the United States so as to accelerate the progress of the Soviet strategy and to put it back on the rails.

This strategy is a deliberate and coordinated walk towards ultimate victory by advancing first the left leg of action by ‘liberals’, then the right leg of action by ‘hardliners’ and then once more the left leg of action by ‘liberals’. The ‘dismissal’ of Gorbachev is temporary. In earlier Memoranda I predicted a calculated ‘resignation’ by Gorbachev and his eventual return to power.

The ‘coup’ confirms this prediction. According to my analysis, the ‘coup’ is aimed at intensifying American anxieties over the fate of Gorbachev and the other ‘liberals’ and ‘reformists’ in the USSR like Shevardnadze. When these concerns reach their peak, the Soviet strategists’ next move can be expected. They will return Gor- bachev and other ‘liberals’ to power through a campaign of strikes and demonstra- tions organised by the Party.

As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev’s return and the strengthening of the ‘reformists’ in the USSR will also strengthen the American liberals, revive their fortunes and help them win future elections – leading eventually to the convergence of the United States and the USSR. In short, Gorbachev’s return will be a repetition of the device of the suppression of Solidarity in Poland, followed by its victory.

The main purpose of the ‘coup’ is to reverse an unfavourable situation for potential Soviet allies in the United States and to create favourable conditions for the implementation of the convergence strategy. The second objective is to secure the non-violent creation of the new Soviet Federation of Republics. The third objective is to provide any potential adventurers there may be in the Soviet military with a lesson and thereby to eliminate any possibility of a genuine coup in the future.

Moscow, August 20, 1991. Russian President Boris Yeltsin makes communist first salute and speaks at a rally held in support of “democracy”. (Photo by: Sovfoto/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SOVIET ‘COUP’

The point has already been made that Gorbachev will be returned to power at the moment when it best serves the Soviet strategy of convergence. Depending on the circumstances prevailing at the appropriate time, he could be returned to power through an election, after a period of other activities .

His alleged removal from power and house arrest are deliberate devices to build up his popularity before such an election. Meanwhile one can expect that the Soviet strategists intend to replace him or to add to his team another ace card, the ‘anti-Communist’ (but, like Gorbachev, protege of Andropov) Boris Yeltsin, leader of the Russian Republic. As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev has exhausted the influence he exerted on their behalf in the West. He was unable to extract more econ- omic aid at the London Summit Meeting and his advice concerning a diplomatic solution to the conflict with Iraq was ignored by President Bush. It is the strategists’ belief that Boris Yeltsin will give greater credibility in the West to Soviet economic and political ‘reform’. He will be in a better position to exploit his influence to extract additional economic aid from the West and, in particular, to obtain from the West a commitment to a new Marshall Plan for Russia.

A Marshall Plan for Russia is one of the primary interim objectives of the Soviet strategists and one that Gorbachev failed to achieve. The strategists expect that Yeltsin will be able to exert greater influence in diplomatic, economic and political relationships and will receive more cooperation in the international arena particularly in the Middle East and at the United Nations. One can expect that the Soviet strategists will come forward with fresh initiatives combined with deliberate provo- cations and crises in order to enhance the role of the United Nations.

They will do this because they regard the United Nations as a stepping stone to a future World Government The Soviet political game and the Soviets’ trickery in ‘manipulating’ politicians like Gorbachev and Y eltsin for W estern public consumption demand more imagination and a better grasp of these machinations from the Bush Administration. For example, to proceed with the appointment of Mr Robert Strauss as the new Ambassador in Moscow is a great mistake because the appointment is being made at a time when the Soviet strategists are deliberately undermining the credit and prestige President Bush gained from his dealings with Gorbachev. They are undercutting the President in favour of their political allies – namely, the American liberals. Nowadays the situation is more serious than it was after the Second World War. President Truman woke up to the nature of Stalin’s mentality, his deeds and his intentions. The Bush Administration, by contrast, has no understanding of Soviet strategy and its ultimate, aggressive, strategic designs against the United States.

Given this situation and the Soviet ‘game plan’, the President, instead of appointing a politician/businessman like Robert Strauss as American Ambassador in Moscow, should consider appointing someone like Richard Helms or General Vernon Walters – that is to say, a professional man and an intelligence expert who might see through the Soviet game plan and help the Administration as General Bedell Smith helped President Truman in 1947.

THE AUTHOR’S ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CALCULATED SOVIET ‘COUP’ AND OF ITS CALCULATED ‘FAILURE’

According to my assessment, the Soviet ‘coup’ and its ‘failure’ constituted a grandiose display of deception – a provocation. The ‘ineptitude’ of the participants in the ‘coup’ and the ‘failure’ of it were skilfully planned and executed. The main argument in support of this assessment is that the Soviet military, the KGB, the Party and leading media figures apparently had neither the skill to launch a successful coup nor the guts to crush resistance to it. This is news indeed!

Oleg Kalugin, former KGB general, giving a speech after the Russian government forces suppressed the fake August Coup – an attempt by supposed hard-line members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) to take control of the country. Moscow, Russia, on August 20, 1991. (Photo by Wojtek Laski/Getty Images)

Facing a real crisis in Hungary in 1956, the same forces displayed exceptional skill, knowhow and determination in crushing a genuine revolt. Knowledge of the Soviet mentality and of Moscow’s record of ruthless action has convinced this analyst that the Soviet military, the Party and the leaders of the media all have the skill, the will and the courage to crush genuine resistance and opposition. They did not display them on this occasion because the abortive ‘coup’ was carried out in accor- dance with Party instructions; and it was the Party and the Komsomol themselves which organised the alleged resistance to it.

The real participants both in the ‘coup’ and in the ‘failure’ were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party offi- cials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interests of the Party’s strategy and under the guidance of its strategists. The calculated nature of the ‘coup’ and its timing show that it was staged by the Russian, President Yeltsin, to save the essence of the Union at the time of transition to a new form of federation.

The abortive ‘coup’ and the ‘resistance’ to it were carefully calculated displays intended primarily for the West. This explains why Western media contacts with Moscow were not curtailed. On the contrary, the big guns of the Soviet media like Vitaliy Korotich and representatives of the Arbatov Institute were on hand both in Moscow and in the United States to ‘help’ the Western media with their interpretation of developments in the USSR. The episode shows how well Soviet strategists like Arbatov and his experts on the American media have mastered the art of projecting such displays for consumption by the American media, and throughout the West.

The Soviet strategists sought to underline for the West the dramatic ineptitude of the ‘coup’ and the spectacular courage and resistance displayed by the new ‘Russian democrats’ and their leader Yeltsin in ‘defending’ the Soviet Parliament – their symbolic equivalent of ‘The White House’. The main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratisation is genuine, that it has the support of the people and that it is working. They want to convince the West that Western investment in the USSR will pay dividends.

They expect that the West will now respond with a new Marshall Plan which will bring Western technology flooding in to the Soviet Union, promoting joint ven- tures and stimulating a restructuring of the Soviet economy along the lines of the revival of the German and Japanese economies after the Second World War.

Internally, one objective is to influence the Soviet population towards acceptance of the new Party-controlled ‘democracy’ as a real power and to develop the strength and maturity of the new ‘democratic’ structure and the popularity of its leaders, especially Yeltsin. Another objective is to exploit this staged ‘coup’ in order to reorganise and ‘reform’ the Soviet bureaucracy, the military, the intelligence and counter-intelligence organisations and the diplomatic service, and to give them a new ‘democratic’ image.

The Soviet strategists realise that only with such a new image, implying a ‘Break with the Past’ and severance from Communism, can these organisations be converted into effective weapons for convergence with their counterparts in the United States. A further internal objective is to emphasise the change in the system by means of the spectacular, televised but calculated removal of old Communist symbols like the monuments to Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy, and the red banners.

These changes do not represent a genuine and sincere repudiation of Soviet design and intentions to secure an eventual world victory. Although very spectacular, the changes are cosmetic. They demonstrate only that Arbatov and others know how to manipulate the American and other Western media through the use of powerful symbols such as the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the toppling of Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy statues and Yeltsin’s staged ‘defence’ of the Soviet ‘White House’.

If the Soviets were truly moving towards genuine democracy, and were intent on a true ‘Break with the Past’, these symbolic changes would be accompanied by the introduction and implementation of a de-communisation programme, the irrevocable (not cosmetic) prohibition of the Communist Party and Komsomol organisations at all levels throughout the USSR, and the removal of ‘former’ Party and Komsomol members from all the main seats of power including the KGB, the Soviet army and its political commissar administration, the Ministries, especially those for the Interior and Foreign Affairs, and the trade unions.

Yeltsin has allegedly banned the Communist Party in Russia. But the question should be asked: ‘Why did he forget to ban the Komsomol youth organisation?’ [Note: According to ‘The New York Times’ of 29 September 1991, the Komsomol voted to dissolve itself; its regulations were changed ‘to allow subordinate youth leagues in the Soviet Republics to succeed it’ – Author’s emphasis].

To carry conviction, the necessary purge of former Communists would have to be carried out at all levels, as was the intention with the de-nazification programme in Germany after the war. Without any such programme, present changes, however impressive, will remain cosmetic.

There are at present no means of distinguishing reliably between a genuine democrat and a former Communist in Russia. However one important criterion for judging the sincerity of the abrupt and virtually simultaneous conversion of former Communist leaders into true democrats would be a frank official statement from them that the Soviet Party and Government adopted a long-range strategy in the years 1958 to 1960, that ‘perestroika’ is the advanced phase of this strategy, and that it is to be abandoned forthwith in favour of normal, open, civilised relations. There has been no sign whatsoever of any such admission.

Further criteria for judging the sincerity of the abrupt conversion of ‘former’ Communist leaders into believers in true democracy would need to include:

  • An official admission that the ‘dissident movement’ and its leader, Sakharov, were serving the interests of that strategy under KGB control;
  • Public exposure of the main KGB agents among Soviet scientists, priests, writers and theatre and movie personalities who have been playing an active role in the KGB-controlled political ‘opposition’ – especially those like the ‘conservative’ Kochetov and the ‘liberal’ Tvardovskiy who in the 1960s engaged in a Party- and KGB-controlled debate intended to convey the false impression that Soviet society was evolving towards democracy;
  • And finally: a categorical repudiation of any strategic intention on the part of the Soviets of working towards ‘convergence’ with the United States.

The self-evident absence of any of these criteria indicates that the symbolic changes mean no more than that the strategists had reached the conclusion that the old symbols had outlived their usefulness – at least, in the Soviet Union and East- em Europe – and had to be replaced by new, more attractive, popular symbols.

Moreover these cosmetic changes are logical and were predicted earlier by this ana- lyst. The Soviets realised that convergence with the United States cannot be achieved under the old compromised symbols like Lenin, Dzerzhinskiy and others associated in the Western mind with terror, repression, exile and bloodshed. Convergence requires the introduction of new, attractive, national and ‘democratic’ symbols conveying the impression that Soviet ‘democracy’ is approaching the Western model.

No doubt these cosmetic changes, the reorganisation of the Soviet bureau- cracy and the new, more enigmatic status of its leaders like Yeltsin will be seen by the West as a deepening of the process of Soviet’ reform’, offering new opportunities for Western policy. But the West’s main weakness remains unchanged: it cannot grasp the fact that it is facing an acceleration in the unfolding of Soviet convergence strategy which is intended to procure the subservience of the West to Moscow under an ultimate Communist World Government.

The Machiavellian boldness and imagination displayed by the Soviet strategists through their staged ‘coup’ and its preordained defeat are alarming. No doubt these manoeuvres will be followed not only by faked suicides, but also by staged trials of the alleged leaders of the ‘coup’. These leaders may well be sentenced to apparent prison terms. But in fact they will live in comfortable retirement in resort areas like the Crimea and the Caucasus. Russia is a big country and places can be found for them to hide.

The ‘coup’ and its ‘defeat’ show that the Soviets will go to any lengths in pur- suit of their convergence strategy. This reminds me of remarks by Vladimir Zhenikhov, the former KGB Rezident in Finland, and Aleksey Novikov, another KGB officer, at the time the strategy was adopted in 1961.

Both of them had recently returned from home leave in Moscow. When I asked for the latest news from headquarters, both replied using different words but to the same effect: ‘This time the KGB are going to finish with capitalist America once and for all’. I believed them then, and I believe that what is happening now is a bad omen for Western democracy.

The other alarming aspect of the situation is Western euphoria and the uncritical acceptance of present Soviet developments at their face value. This shows how easily the West can be taken in by staged Soviet spectacles, and how justified the strategists are in believing that their ‘era of provocations’ will produce the intended results. Furthermore, Western euphoria and naivete serve only to encourage the Soviet strategists to stage new spectacles more convinced than ever that their strategic designs are realistic.

Sanhedrin addresses Putin as Jewish king

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin lighting something as part of Jewish ritual at the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow on February 19, 2013, with Russia’s chief rabbi, Berel Lazar (R), attending. ALEXEY DRUZHININ/AFP/Getty Images

By Child of the Immaculata – Apoc. 12:17
June 14, 2019 Anno Domini

“Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday met with a delegation of rabbis, led by Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, former Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, Chief Rabbi of Russia Berel Lazar, and rabbis of the Rabbinical Center of Europe (RCE). Rabbi Yosef began by saying ‘according to the Jewish tradition, your leadership is decided by the kingdom of G-d, King of the world, and therefore we bless you: Blessed is the One who gave of His glory to flesh and blood.”

Putin: ‘I support the struggle of Israel’

The Jewish tradition of royal address

 

Also,
 ‘Putin also spoke out against Holocaust deniers, calling them not only stupid but also shameless.’
Before moving to Russia from the USA, Russian national Iskander Hashim testifies the aforementioned Chief Rabbi of Russia Berel Lazar was in trouble with the police for paedophilia and child pornography (40:04- 41:04.). He also said that Lazar was introduced into Russia by the Head of the KGB in the 1990’s and Putin made him Chief Rabbi in 2000. Also, in an interview Lazar described himself as ‘Putin’s rabbi’, yet Putin is positioning himself as a Christian. (29.35-30:50);
In this context of Lazar’s troubles with the US police, it is worthy of note that Alexander Litvinenko accused Putin of being a paedophile;

Putin and Russian Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar

Chabad leader, Messiah Menachem Mendel Schneerson 1994

“For all these activities paramount for us, we will give monarchy to the Slavic cattle under the guise of ‘democratic transition’. And the more glitter, noise, pump, the better! Monarchy is good in that sense that it directs all the energy of the masses into the whistle. A Monarch will detract attention of the herd from our secret active work on the structuring of the population according to the system, necessary to us. A President is a screen, seemingly elected by a popular vote (and we will forge electoral procedures in such a way that they will seem so that everything would seem legitimate), and we are going to do all our necessary business from behind this screen. The President will be endowed with unlimited powers. Through changes in the top ranks of security agencies, this president will appoint our people to the posts in the security agencies. Army, all the national security agencies, and all sorts of special forces will be directly subordinate to the president. And that means that they will be subordinate to us. We will have in our hands only the strings attached to the hands of the president. And we’ll pull these strings in such a way as it is necessary to the implementation of our grandiose plan of conquering all the tribes and kingdoms, their subordination to our superior nation, chosen by God of Israel.

Soviet dialectics & predictive power

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
Excerpt from The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 26-27 (1998 edition)
June 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Correct understanding of the strategy and the application of that understanding to the analysis of events enables one to predict otherwise surprising Soviet actions. Since the strategy is long-range, it has several phases. The strategists plan their actions in the early phases in preparation for the final phase. They conceive Soviet reforms in the initial phase, they rehearse them in the preparatory phase and they introduce them in the final phase. Because of this planning framework, the strategy has its own dialectic. It has its thesis – the Stalinist regime: its antithesis – criticism and rejection of the Stalinist regime: and its synthesis – a new, reformed model which ‘perestroika’ is designed to create, and which will be the product of ‘convergence’ (the joining of the two opposites). Understanding the dialectic and logic of the strategy is crucial for prediction: it enables one to see how the situation in one phase will develop in the next phase.

For instance, it enables one to predict the change in the role and status of Soviet ‘dissidents’. In the initial phase, they were recruited and trained by the KGB. In the preparatory phase, they were ‘criticised’ and ‘persecuted’ by the KGB. In the final phase, they are accepted and even incorporated into ‘perestroika’. It was through understanding this dialectic that the Author was able to predict the simple fact that Sakharov ‘might be included in some capacity in government’. In the event, he became one of Gorbachev’s chief advisers.

Likewise, the dialectic enables one to understand that Euro-Communist criticism in the 1960s and 1970s of repressive practices and violations of human rights in the USSR was undertaken and tolerated with official foreknowledge of the impending ‘reform’ of the Soviet system. The fact that the Berlin Wall was built at the time when the strategy was adopted was a sufficient basis for the prediction that it would be pulled down again in the strategy’s final phase. The dialectic enables one to see through the calculated publication of anti-Soviet manuscripts abroad, Soviet condem- nation of them at the time and the present lifting of the ban on much of the ‘dissident’ writing of the 1960s and 1970s. Understanding of the dialectic enables one to provide further predictions and warnings about political and social issues which the Soviet strategists will seek to exploit in Western Europe, the United States and elsewhere.

The Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church

To: E. Michael Jones, Professor Kevin MacDonald, Nick Griffin, Jeff Rense, Michael Rivero, James Corbett,  Henry Makow, Jordan Peterson, Patrick Wood, Nathanael Kapner, Mike Herzog, Christopher Bollyn, Michael Voris, David Duke
From: Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)
Subject: Open Letter regarding the Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church
Date: July 1, 2018 Anno Domini

via email

Dear Brothers:

A small minority of us in the Western nationalist movement feel it imperative to alert leaders and persons of influence in our sphere of the great Russia deception. For it seems the great majority in our movement are being deceived on a massive scale by a decades-old, highly sophisticated, and highly co-ordinated campaign to lure the Church and Western nationalists into a trap in order to finally clinch world communistic government.

Essentially, the deception lies in the mistaken belief in the collapse of communist power in Russia, in the supposed Sino-Soviet split, and in the alleged rebirth of conservatism/nationalism/Christian orthodoxy in the current Russian Federation. Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn attempted to warn the world of this grand Russia deception in the 1980s through his contacts in the Central Intelligence Agency; however, we fear his efforts may have been sabotaged by Zionist agents within the CIA, namely one James Jesus Angleton. As a result, his message appears to have been blocked from reaching the appropriate channels of power in government and, ultimately, omitted from foreign policy plans of Western nations.

Golitsyn laid out in his memoranda to the CIA (made public through his two books: New Lies for Old and The Perestroika Deception) how the long-range Soviet plan—based on Leninist deception methods—was to restructure communism in China and the Soviet bloc to the more aesthetically appealing democratic socialism in order to lull the West to sleep over the world communist threat. Once this step had been accomplished (in the 1990s), the plan was to move on to the next phase, which would involve what Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov described as the demoralization of the Western social sphere, where the crypto-Soviet regime would externalize onto the West a seemingly contradictory policy of promoting opposing extreme Right and Left ideals as well as identity politics—with the hope of disarming, destabilizing, and weakening it. The perceived mystique surrounding this hyper-normalization doctrine has kept the public and Western analysts from detecting the stealth long-range Soviet plan for world government. As we have learned through the latest U.S. presidential election, the Soviets have manipulated the U.S. electoral process, mainly by way of mimetic warfare through the cyber medium, which polarized the electorate using well organized online troll armies. It appears that the crypto-Soviets were not as concerned with the winner of the election as they were with the resulting polarization of the American populace. The alleged Soviet blackmail of Trump just happened to be an bonus and insurance policy on their strategy. At present, Russia appears to be feigning a return to conservatism and Orthodoxy as part of its two-tiered hyper-normalization deception. But make no mistake, it is all a ruse. The crypto-Soviet power is no friend to the Church, to the West, nor to the Russian people.

Not only does Golitsyn have a greater-than-90-per-cent accuracy rate through his hundreds of predictions of Soviet manoeuvres over the last three decades, he has corroboration through the admissions of one of the Soviets’ top modern Marxist prophets: Alexander Dugin. It is clear that Dugin—a self-described nationalist Bolshevist who helped found the Communist Party of the Russian Federation following the staged disintegration of the CPSU—is the rebirth of Karl Marx. His political theories are realizing Lenin’s vision for the final victory of world communism. Through a cleverly veiled dialectic, Dugin and his Duginism have apparently captivated Western nationalists, even Church leaders. They’ve been deceived into thinking Dugin’s Bolshevik concepts are aligned with the goals of Western nationalism and the Church’s social conservatism. Duginism appears to be the fulfillment of another important aspect of the world communist goal in the Warburg’s Kalergi Plan, which involves a push towards transhumanism and the de-Europeanization of the West through unfettered migration of mostly Islamic and Asiatic populations to Europe and its Western daughters in North America and Oceania. Dugin makes it clear in his many political papers that Russia and its KGB-invented Eurasian mandate for the world involves the disintegration of ethno and religious states and the integration of all peoples and faiths—the final realization of Judaeo-masonic world communistic government. Brother Maurice Pinay warned the world of this plan in The Plot Against the Church (1962).

The capstone of this great Russia deception lies in the Judaized global technocracy agenda, which is central to the planned communistic world government. We have learned that the existing Sino-Soviet axis is now fully dedicated to the development and integration of Israeli high technology (Talpiot program, 8200). This collectivist technocracy—as outlined in such schemes as the United Nations’ Agenda 21—will be mandatory for all citizens of the planned world government. The Soviets have the demoralized West occupied with identity politics and Balkanization schemes, like Kalergi, while Israel, Russia, China, and the BRICS solidify their alliance through the One Belt, One Road plan and construct the coming world government techno-infrastructure smart grid. It appears Russia is leading the disintegration of the West while Israel leads the technology aspect, and China the manufacturing aspect. Furthermore, Israel appears poised to replace its military sponsor in the United States with the militaries of both Russia and China. As we recently have seen, Russia is policing the Middle East on behalf of Israel with greater intensity. Golitsyn warned that this Judaeo-Sino-Soviet axis would use co-operation blackmail to get Western complicity. This can only mean that the axis is militarily superior to the West and NATO!

To address the causes of this deception proves difficult. One possible primary cause, and something which Golitsyn notes, is the repeated use of failed Western analysis of the highly complex Soviet strategy. Soviet defectors have told the West that Soviet propaganda relies to a great degree on the concept of controlled opposition, as was demonstrated with the Soviet Trust honeypot model under Lenin, and on the use of double agents. It seems that Western nationalists and Church leaders have failed to recognize the repeated use of these sophisticated tactics, save for some traditional Catholic opponents to the communist-inspired modernization of the Vatican and some faithful Eastern Orthodox, like in ROCOR and the Catacomb Church, who learned of Soviet manipulation and control of Church leadership (still going on). It is possible that our Catholic brothers may be further deceived by the great Russia deception due to their reliance on the Fatima prophecies, which predict a reconciliation of Russia with the Roman Catholic Church.

We implore you to rethink your position regarding Russia and its role in the reshaping of the world as we know it. If Golitsyn proves to be correct yet again, Western failure to detect and act upon this great Russian deception inevitably will result in its own demise, along with the Church as we know it. Embracing your future captors is not a good idea.

Sincerely,

Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)

Trump controlled by Mossad – Part V

Trump at event with broadcaster Mike Wallace (second from right) and Mossad super spy Robert Maxwell (right). The man in the middle with the glasses is Senator John Tower, who was involved in Maxwell’s KGB/Mossad PROMIS software scandal.

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 3, 2018 Anno Domini

Why and for whom had convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged procurer girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell bugged the sexual encounters between his elite friends and children and prostitutes? Was it merely for billionaire Epstein’s own gain or was it for someone else? Was Epstein the ringleader? Or was it actually his girlfriend?

It seems unlikely that the already-rich Epstein did it for his own blackmail purposes. It’s difficult to find a clear motive. Epstein doesn’t seem like a politically ambitious character. Instead, he seems content with his billions and sexual license. What seems more likely is that Epstein and Maxwell were doing it for a third party. Let’s continue to speculate, as we have for the breadth of this series, that that third party is Israel’s bloody spy agency Mossad and about what they stood to gain from Epstein’s sexual blackmail of prominent people, especially U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump rides Lady Ghislaine in Mossad super cell

Maxwell and the Lady Ghislaine.

Donald Trump revealed in 2002 that he had been friends with Jeffrey Epstein for 15 years. That would put the start of their friendship around 1987; although, it’s possible their friendship began earlier. The late disgraced Mossad superspy and media mogul Robert Maxwell (Jewish name: Abraham Leib Hoch, of a Chassidic Jewish Czech family), the father of Epstein’s alleged child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, held a party on his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine (named after his favourite daughter), sometime in the spring of 1989. Guess who was at that party? Donald Trump. Also on board, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch[1], were Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. senator John Tower (of Iran-Contra scandal infamy), and other prominents, like ex-navy secretary John Lehman. Whether Epstein was at that party is anyone’s guess, but it’s certainly plausible, as Robert Maxwell had extensive dealings with bankers and financiers, including the Rothschilds, his “trusted friends” Goldman Sachs, and Lehman brothers. You’ll remember from the first part of this series that Trump’s yacht, Trump Princess, was purchased from Mossad asset and major Iran-Contra player Adnan Khashoggi. Maxwell’s £12-million yacht, Lady Ghislaine, was purchased from one of Khashoggi’s brothers. As we will see, Maxwell himself was a significant player in the Iran-Contra affair on behalf of Israel’s Mossad and, to some extent, the Soviet Union.

Ghislaine Maxwell (right) with Abigail Klem, chief brand officer of Ivanka Trump’s clothes and accessories line, at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party at The Core Club in New York City, February 14, 2007.

So now we have established not only a long-standing relationship between Trump and Epstein but also between Trump and two Maxwells—Robert and his daughter Ghislaine. Trump’s late father Fred personally may have known Robert Maxwell as well, as Fred was involved in major real estate projects that would have interested characters like Maxwell and his money-laundering thug pals in the Soviet Union, who laundered much of their dirty money through New York and Florida—two places in which Donald Trump has primary residences. Donald Trump and Ghislaine could be friends, business partners, acquaintances, or perhaps something more. The trio (including Epstein) has been spotted together on multiple occasions, including when golf magazine writer Michael Corcoran sat with Trump, Ghislaine, and Epstein on Trump’s private plane in order to conduct an interview.[2] In 2007, Ghislaine Maxwell was photographed with Ivanka Trump’s future brand officer of her clothing company at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party in New York City in 2007. Trump and Ghislaine may have been intimately involved with each other. Whatever the case, on board Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989, Trump was in the hands of a Mossad super cell.

Trump, Melania, Jeffrey Epstein, and GhislaineMaxwell at Trump’s Florida residence Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, February 12, 2000. Epstein’s residence is blocks away.

Robert Maxwell: Soviet-friendly Mossad superspy

In that same year Trump was riding the Lady Ghislaine, Robert Maxwell was extremely busy scheming and scamming his way to riches and power, simultaneously working for himself as publisher of his British media empire, Mossad, the Soviets, and organized crime—all of which benefited each other in multiple ways. Maxwell biographers Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon write, “Maxwell used the power of all his newspapers to attack Israel’s enemies” and that he had “acquired a rare and privileged position in the communist world.”[3] When Maxwell wasn’t making hundreds of millions hocking Mossad’s pirated and bugged version of Bill Hamilton’s PROMIS software to intelligence agencies, governments, and criminals around the world—even penetrating the Unites States’ most secure nuclear installation, Sandia National Laboratories—Maxwell was helping Jewish-Soviet mob bosses like Simeon Mogilevich launder money through various world banks and through Maxwell’s complex web of dummy corporations (in the fourth part of this series, we learned of Trump’s role in helping the Mogilevich syndicate launder money through his real estate ventures. Mogilevich also got his hands on a copy of PROMIS, which was allegedly sold to Osama Bin Laden, among others) and brokering deals with likes of Soviet presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and Leonid Brezhnev (purported to be close friends with Maxwell), as well as KGB boss Vladimir Kryuchkov (the main player in the staged “August Coup” against Gorbachev and Perestroika). Maxwell helped Mogilevich obtain an Israeli passport through the Mossad.[4] Perhaps it was Maxwell who first introduced Trump to Mogilevich and other Jewish oligarchs and crime figures. Perhaps they even met on the Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989. Perhaps this is when the Soviets, through mobsters like Mogilevich, first recognized the potential to blackmail and groom Trump as an agent of influence. Former FBI director John O’Neil—who died his first day on the job; September 11, 2001; as head of security at Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center—told journalists that Maxwell’s complex money laundering schemes became the model for Soviet and other organized crime syndicates.[5] Evidently, Trump would go on to walk in Maxwell’s footsteps, providing channels for Soviet oligarch loot—stolen from the mostly peasant millions upon millions of victims of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe.

Was Epstein blackmailing for Mossad through the Maxwells?

Seymour Hersh

To bring plausibility to the theory that Epstein and/or Ghislaine were running the child-sex blackmail ring on behalf of the Mossad, we have to establish a clear link to the Mossad. One is Robert Maxwell, via his daughter Ghislaine. The weight of evidence suggests that in 1991, the Mossad, itself, murdered Robert Maxwell after he allegedly tried to blackmail them into paying off his massive debts and because of the implications of the revelations in The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy by journalist Seymour Hersh that same year that Maxwell had been a secret spy for the Mossad—something that was not publicly known up until that point. Maxwell was apparently assassinated shortly after the publication of Hersh’s book, after British Labour MPs George Galloway and Rupert Allason quoted before the House of Commons a portion of Hersh’s book as it pertained to Maxwell and demanded an investigation into Maxwell and his Mossad ties.[6] The Hersh citations, then free to be reported on by the press under parliamentary privilege, found their way into the British media, and Mossad’s charade began to unravel. Hersh also revealed that one of Maxwell’s Mirror editors, Nick Davies, had helped Maxwell and the Mossad betray former Israeli nuclear technician whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu. Mossad defector Ari Ben-Menashe claimed that in 1986 Robert Maxwell alerted the Israeli embassy (Mossad) that Vanunu had given The Sunday Times a story exposing Israel’s nuclear development at Dimona.[7] Vanunu mistakenly thought that he was giving an independent news outlet the story of the decade. Instead, what he got was a Mossad honey trap, which resulted in the Mossad kidnapping Vanunu after being lured to Italy by a woman of the Mossad. Vanunu was then incarcerated for 18 years in Israel. These revelations, along with Maxwell’s mountainous debt, his ever rising complications with money laundering in the Soviet Block, and his supposed blackmail of the Mossad, appear to have led to his assassination on the Lady Ghislaine 5 November 1991, just weeks after the Hersh bombshell.

Then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir with Robert Maxwell in 1991. Shamir also ran assassinations for Mossad from 1955-1965 and is believed to have been involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Apparently, the Mossad had had enough of a man Likudnik Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir once described as having done more for Israel than any other man on the planet. But remember, there is no honour among thieves. Many high-level operatives were murdered in the aftermath of the Iran-Contra affair—the affair itself being used expressly to help Israel arm Iran and Iraq as part of a Balkanization scheme, which became known as the Yinon Plan.[8] Israel also used the scandal to install Ronald Reagan as president—clearly the preferred choice of the Likud-Chabad syndicate. Donald Trump would go on to become Reagan 2.0 in 2016. Maxwell directly aided the Yinon Plan-Iran-Contra scandal by helping to arm Iran with weapons from Poland. Kryuchkov was fully aware of Israel’s interests in arming its enemies and played right along (Mossad-KGB collaboration). “So the Iranians get to kill more Iraqis. Then, when Teheran is on top, Israel starts to supply Baghdad so as to kill more Iranians.”[9]

Ghislaine Maxwell went on the record stating that her father was murdered, despite the botched investigation that tended towards either a suicide or accident conclusion. Ghislaine didn’t hint at who might have carried out the hit. Would she go on, only a few years later, to help Mossad set up Operation Jeffrey Epstein knowing that the very people she was working for might have killed her dad? Or did her father receiving a state funeral in Jerusalem—attended by the Israeli government’s top brass—fool her into thinking that Mossad was innocent of her father’s death? More interestingly, yet, perhaps she never volunteered to aid the operation in the first place but was approached by the Mossad and obliged out of fear that she might meet a similar fate as her father. She could have detached herself from the past in order to gain what Mossad could have offered her. She was reportedly the most practical in her behavior after learning of her father’s death. It seems she is not a woman ruled by her emotions.

More Epstein-Maxwell-Mossad connections

Ehud Barak

Another Mossad connection between Maxwell and Epstein is Ehud Barak, former Israeli Prime Minister. While working for Mossad and helping Soviet Jews immigrate to Israel, Robert Maxwell would meet with Barak, who was then director of Aman, Israel’s military intelligence.[10] After authorities sentenced Epstein for child prostitution in 2008, they discovered a black contact book containing names of many prominent people, some of whom Epstein is believed to have blackmailed. As well, it contained contact information for some of the child victims. Barak’s name is in there…and it is was circled by Epstein’s former housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez (since died mysteriously) as being one of many to either witness or participate in Epstein’s abuse of young girls. Also circled were the names of Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Alan Dershowitz, among others. Henry Kissinger—close friend to Robert Maxwell—was also listed in Epstein’s book.

Another (potential) Mossad connection with Epstein—also with Robert Maxwell—is late Jewish billionaire bankster Edmund Safra. In a long list of Iran-Contra-Oded-Yinon players, Safra also appears to have been assassinated, in 1999. Safra’s name and contact information were found in Epstein’s black book. Safra was the owner of National Republic Bank of New York and helped Robert Maxwell launder money from the Soviet Bloc.[11]

Maxwell’s involvement in the Soviet Perestroika deception

KGB head Vladimir Kryuchkov.

In addition to Seymour Hersh’s exposure of Robert Maxwell as a secret Mossad spy, Israel may have also feared what Maxwell might reveal about Zionist-Soviet collaboration as well as the Perestroika (restructuring of Russian communism for public consumption) deception, of which Maxwell would certainly have had knowledge, being a close friend with Kryuchkov—one of the fake plotters used to legitimize Perestroika and Glasnost as authentic. Kryuchkov helped Maxwell set up 600 companies through which to move dirty money around the globe; some of that money was made from the theft of U.S. technology. The Soviet defector who exposed the perestroika plot, Anatoliy Golitsyn, says this about Kryuchkov:

“As a leading KGB official, he supervised the experiments with ‘democratisation’ in Czechoslovakia and Poland. His KGB advisers worked closely with the Czechoslovak and Polish security services. As deputy head of the KGB since 1978, Kryuchkov has been intimately engaged in the preparation of ‘perestroika’.”[12]

Before Maxwell became a media baron, he served both in British intelligence and in British Parliament as a Labour MP. Ideologically, he appears to have been the quintessential socialist Jew, except when it came to his own capitalist businesses. Maxwell even smoked specially rolled Cuban cigars on the order of Fidel Castro himself.[13] So it was that Maxwell would go on to collaborate with the Communists in the Soviet Union to help Jews colonize Israel and to help the communists rob blind the proletariat. The Soviets began to issue visas to its Jews planning to immigrate to Israel following Maxwell’s visits to and collaboration with the Soviet Union.[14] The astute reader will remember that the Soviet Union, next only to the United States, was the first to recognize the illegal state of Israel in 1948. I won’t get into it here, but it’s well-established that communism and socialism are constructs designed to advance exclusively Jewish interests. Maxwell, and almost certainly Mossad, could have been part of the Soviet development of the Perestroika deception (the fake collapse of communism designed to bring down the guard of the West). The Mossad’s motto, after all, is By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War. Could Maxwell’s alleged blackmail of Mossad have involved disclosure of Israel’s collaboration with the Soviets and their perestroika fraud? It seems that such a revelation would have been more detrimental to Israel’s long-range global plan—especially in light of their immense alliance with Russia today—than anything Mossad defectors Victor Ostrovsky or Ari Ben-Menashe revealed as motives—not to say that what they revealed wasn’t significant. It certainly was.

Maxwell with Soviet leader Leonid Brehznev (middle) in 1978.

Golitsyn summarizes the role of agents of influence like the late Robert Maxwell and U.S. President Donald Trump working in tandem with Soviet Perestroika initiatives:

“These KGB assets will be used to generate Western support for ‘perestroika’ in the USSR and Eastern Europe and also to prepare a favourable climate for ‘restructuring’ in, and convergence with, the United States, Europe and the Third World…. The ultimate objective is Lenin’s replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘New World Social Order’ – World [Communist] Government…. What the West fails to appreciate is that the motive for doing so and for introducing controlled ‘democracy’ is to stimulate changes in the Western system and to facilitate the convergence of the two systems with a view to the eventual absorption of the Western democracies within a World Government.”[15]

Israel’s use for Perestroika is part of its world governance strategy, which involves the leadership of the rising Eurasian power, or BRICS hierarchy, with the self-proclaimed “chosen people” ruling it all. The Jews call it “olam ha ba”, the world to come—their messianic kingdom on earth with gentiles as their footstool.

No doubt, Maxwell used his vast influence through his media empire not only to portray Israel as the good guy but also to perpetuate the legitimacy of Gorbachev’s perestroika deception. The media, after all, were the Western’ world’s only disseminators of what went on in the Soviet Union. Thomas and Dillon reveal Kryuchkov as saying, “’Comrade Maxwell is going to be a good friend of this country.’ And Maxwell replied that he would be glad to tell the world how much the Soviet Union was changing.”[16] Maxwell would go on to purchase the English-speaking Soviet paper The Moscow News. “The newspaper had been Maxwell’s attempt to embrace the liberating policies of Mikhail Gorbachev. Both saw the newspaper as a means to promote perestroika.”[17]

JULY 1, 1987 – Donald Trump and Ivana visit Palace Square in St. Petersburg, USSR. This is the same year year Trump and Jeffrey Epstein became friends. The Steele dossier alleges that St. Petersburg was another city in which Trump was sexually compromised by Russian kompromat agents. (Photo by Maxim Blokhin / TASS via Getty Images)

Did Maxwell pass on sexual blackmail of Trump to the Soviets?

If Robert Maxwell, or even his daughter Ghislaine, had blackmail material on Donald Trump, either from Jeffrey Epstein’s various Kompromat Klubs or other sources, what are the chances that it was passed on not only to Mossad but also to the Soviets? Perhaps the Mossad originally contracted it out to the Soviets and Maxwell joined the fray later, or Soviet blackmail of Trump may have been a back up to Mossad’s. We may never know. But the highly controversial Christopher Steele dossier tends to corroborate this theory as well as Golitsyn’s perestroika deception hypothesis—something both the Left- and Right-wing media completely ignore. Unforuntately, those on the Right have been kept from reading the dossier by way of deception. They have been told that it was invented by the Democrat Party, which it doesn’t appear to be. The dossier appears to be authentic and is a must read for truth seekers. The Steele dossier discusses Trump’s sexual compromise as taking place in Russia (i.e. “PissGate”), which isn’t hard to believe. It doesn’t say exactly how far back the kompromat of Trump extended, but it’s likely to have gone back many years, as Trump has been involved with the Russians for a long time.

Maxwell’s protege Epstein

Like Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Maxwell was considered a “sexual predator” by at least one lover of his.[18] Also like Ghislaine and Epstein, he was no stranger to bugging. Maxwell had bugged his own offices—even restrooms—at the Daily Mirror in order to snoop on his employees. It seems that Ghislaine sees in Epstein the image of her father. Is this the reason she aids and abets his criminal activities, or is it because as the ringleader, she needs him. Perhaps it’s a little bit of both.

Maxwell a Chabadnik?

In the previous installment of this series, we learned how Soviet power changed only in name—from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to an organized crime syndicate controlled by the Chassidic Jewish Chabad Lubavitch, with which Donald Trump is deeply entagled. Although Maxwell’s upbringing was in a Chassidic Jewish household, there isn’t a lot of evidence linking Maxwell to the Chabadniks. In 2015, Chabad Headquarters published an article linking Maxwell with Chabadnik rabbi Yitzchak (Izzy) Kogan.

“Emotionally difficult though it was, Izzy nevertheless returned to Russia and put his street-smarts to work, negotiating with diplomats and private philanthropists to facilitate the dramatic air-lift of 226 children from the Chernobyl area to Israel. He reached out to Robert Maxwell and Armand Hammer who sent their own aircraft to evacuate the children since Russia refused to provide its own carrier. After several tense days during which the children were kept waiting in the Minsk airport with 400 frustrated parents, they finally arrived in Israel to great fanfare.”[19]

Notes:

[1] On Their Toes, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 17, 1989, pg. 7W.

[2] Graham, Regina F., Donald Trump ‘singled out a ‘young socialite’ at his Mar-a-Lago club and told reporter ‘there is nothing in the world like first-rate p**sy” in interview with defunct golf magazine years before infamous Access Hollywood tape, The Daily Mail, November 29, 2017 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5131173/Trump-comment-p-sy-years-tape.html

[3] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, pages 125 & 39

[4] ibid, pg. 173

[5] ibid, pg. 368

[6] Mystery surrounds tabloid tycoon’s death Maxwell Communication Corporation, Altoona Mirror, Nov. 6, 1991, pg. B8

[7] Verkaik, Robert, The Mystery of Maxwell’s death, The Independent, March 10, 2006 – http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=https%3a%2f%2fwww.independent.co.uk%2fnews%2fuk%2fcrime%2fthe-mystery-of-maxwells-death-469294.html&d=4972289678183054&mkt=en-CA&setlang=en-US&w=-Z2STye4d0XVIvJhZQCaX8JYNB2WNIwM

[8] Yinon, Oded, A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties, translated by Israel Shahak, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.; Belmond, Massachusetts, 1982 – http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33220.htm

[9] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 111

[10] ibid, pg. 112

[11] ibid, pg. 228

[12] Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception: The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 22

[13] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 32

[14] ibid, page 43

[15] ibid, pgs. 43, 66, and 128

[16] ibid, pg. 43

[17] ibid, pg. 167

[18] ibid, pg. 28

[19] Olidort, Baila, PROFILE IN COURAGE: The Tzadik of Leningrad, Chabad Lubavitch Headquarters News, November 2, 2015 – http://lubavitch.com/news/article/2056177/PROFILE-IN-COURAGE-The-Tzadik-of-Leningrad.html

Stephen Lendman is Trotskyite controlled opposition

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 29, 2018

Opinion writer Stephen Lendman is the quintessential alternative media Putin and Trump cheerleader these days.

He seemed to ride in a decade ago among the patriot movement on the coattails of anti-Zionism, even though he appears to believe in a pure form of Zionism that is true to Torah. Once, upon entering online conspiracy circles (as far back as 2006?), Lendman had stripped away the guard of truthers, he was able to bring in his real agenda: Trotskyite communism, which naturally entails promoting the de-Stalinized crypto-Soviet state of Russia, headed by organized crime-installed Vladimir Putin and run by international Jewish crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch.

Initially, Lendman got his push from big alt media aggregates like Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero, and others. He is an associate for another apparent Jewish Trotskyite, the pro-Russian, pro-Trump Michel Chossudovsky and his Centre for Research on Globalization (GlobalReseearch.ca). Lendman hasn’t become huge, but he has been a consistent Trotskyite voice in the alt media. He was cheerleading Russia long before it became popular for the Alt Media to do so.

Lendman starts off his latest Kremlin-backed public relations piece with,

“US-led Western media reporting on Russia is consistently hostile, a disturbing near-daily tirade of disinformation, Big Lies and fake news.”

Ironic considering Jewish-led alternative media reporting on Russia is consistently favourable to the Reds, and even more disturbingly, carries out daily rants about how the Russians (Soviets) are supposedly saving the planet from the banksters and reviving Christianity and nationalism. You’d be hard-pressed to find even one major alternative media personality who criticizes Russia. Go on. I challenge you to find just one. In that same article, Lendman completely dismisses the fact of the Kremlin’s online troll farming, like that of the Internet Research Agency, which is part of the Soviet’s Perestroika psychological warfare plan, not just a division but the core basis of its intelligence apparatus.

Getting back to Lendman’s latest desinformatsiya piece, Lendman vents his seeming outrage at the “notorious Russophobic” Anne Applebaum. Gotta love the irony of Jews criticizing their fellow controlled opposition Jews, sort of like the Trotskyite-Zionist approved fake anti-communist American Jewish League Against Communism, which was largely funded by Bernard Baruch. The anti-Communist McCarthyite movement was entirely controlled by Jews—one of the reasons being to take the heat off of Jews when it came to fingering them as leading the worldwide communist conspiracy. It’s a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup. Lendman, apparently, is another fox. There are many just like him in the alternative media. Nobody seems to be deviating from the pro-Russian script. Nobody except for a few voices with not much of a platform.

Those are just some examples, but Lendman stops at nothing to portray Russia as a perfect angel and saviour of humanity. He deliberately is misleading his audience.

I did a search of Lendman’s site using the term “Perestroika Deception”, which obviously is my latest obsession, and I came across two references, but they were to only “Perestroika” and they were just brief references to Gorbachev’s public Perestroika program. You would think a man like Lendman certainly would have come across Antatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika thesis. But it’s completely absent. And for good reason. It’s the thesis that would put Lendman out of business, as well as dismantle the entire Judeo-Soviet ruse that has hypnotized the West and launched into Cold War 2.0 theatrics.

Anti-Jewish (chassidic) Stalinist era propaganda. Now that Stalinism has been purged from the crytpo-Soviet Russian state, we are seeing the re-Judaizing of Russia and ever stronger ties between Israel and Russia.

Lendman seems to believe that throwing in the odd piece about the plight of the Palestinians will legitimize his disinformation operation to the alternative media audience. He also seems to believe that blaming the U.S. government (not the true culprits in Israel and the Zionist lobby) for the 9/11 conspiracy helps him pass the Truther litmus test. So far, it has worked. Doing a cursory search, I could not find anything remotely critical of Lendman and his work. He is blindly accepted by the truther movement and promoted.

“It’s why growing thousands of Jews globally oppose an ideology based on power, conquest, dispossession, and violation of the most fundamental Jewish ethical and moral teachings, ones Zionists disdain,” Lendman writes in his seemingly anti-Zionist sympathizing with the Jews Against Zionism movement. Where can be found these Jewish “ethical and moral teachings”? Lendman doesn’t really explain. It’s difficult to pinpoint what kind of Jew Lendman is. He could be Orthodox but he could also be liberal or reform (he calls himself “progressive”).

In a review of Lendman’s works, James Petras stated,

“…Lendman’s essays are a major contribution to the struggle for social justice in America.”

Yikes.

Lendman’s apparent left-leaning defence of de-Stalinized Russia is definitely Trotskyite, in some sense. He could be part of a joint ADL-FBI COINTELPRO operation, the way the anti-Stalin communist New York Jews of the McCarthyite era were. And what does it say that the alternative media continues to give Lendman a platform?

Lendman appears to be aiding the Soviet long-range Perestroika strategy to feign Russian democratization while radicalizing and destabilizing the West. With Lendman, throw in some world war fear mongering and you have a unique psyop.

The overall plan is to lull the West to sleep about the communist threat in order to ripen it for a world communistic government takeover, with Russia leading it militarily and Israel bringing us goyim into spiritual enlightenment. The lulling involves both the Left and the Right. The plan has no loyalty to either.

The rise of the radial left (social justice, identity politics, et al) in the West is proof of Perestroika success.