The ‘Alt Right’ is Limited Hangout

alt-right-trump-yiannopoulos

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 1, 2016 Anno Domini

“Limited hangout” is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details; to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when ones own sympathies are privately with them; or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous. —Rational Wiki

From Paul Joseph Watson to Stefan Molyneux, Donald Trump to Milo Yiannopoulos, the rising secular “right wing” in the Americas, dubbed the “alt right” by some, shares one common narrative that reveals it as the limited hangout, controlled-opposition operation that it is.

Omission of the Jewish-Masonic question.

trump-aipacIt is completely absent from any meaningful discourse of every single alt right personality, despite that the Jewish question lurks behind all of the revolutionary movements that have conspired against the West and Christian mores for the last 2,000 years to the present time. With the rise of U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump, his perceived populism, and the growing backlash to political correctness, the alt right has sprung up all too quickly, all too conveniently as those disillusioned with the radical leftist world takeover grapple for answers. Right on cue, the controlled-opposition agents have filled in the gaps and have “answered” our questions in a manner that leaves out the more damning, darker truth.

The legitimate right, those identifying with traditional, Hellenic-Christian culture, appear completely oblivious to this hijacking of the right, much in the same way past controlled opposition garnered favour with the right only to later lead it down a dead-end road or, worse, to slaughter.

All the way down the line, the new alt right talking heads have acted as gatekeepers for the Judeo-Masonic establishment. Take for example Stefan Molyneux and his recent example of excusing Jewish over-representation in positions of influence, Paul Joseph Watson’s laughable denial of Jewish influence anywhere in the world, Alex Jones’ playing limited hangout 20-years plus (defending freemasonry, at times allowing for mild, superficial criticism of Israel but omitting the bigger issues regarding Israel and Judaism), or Donald Trump’s total subservience to the Israel lobby and Judaism (AIPAC, Jewish staffers, Zionist foreign policy position, all his kids either married to or dating Jews). Homosexual alt right icon Milo Yiannopoulos, although a more honest Jew (he has admitted Jewish influence in the world), also serves to advance the controlled right’s agenda of Jewish omission by displacing bigger issues with smaller ones (for example, restricting immigration would require kicking all of the Jewish policymakers and their ilk off of the policy boards and replacing them with populists; shallowly criticizing unfettered immigration solves little).

More Jewish alt right gatekeepers
While I appreciate the many truths spoken by alt right talking heads like Breitbart (founded by Jew Andrew Breitbart), homosexual Jew Matt Drudge (Drudge Report), Ezra Levant (Jewish), Lauren Southern (Rebel Media), or the aforementioned personalities, their agenda is, at best, a half measure solution to the world’s problem, at worst, leading the right to its ultimate destruction. They, like CIA front National Review and the John Birch Society, discuss very real issues but are there to homogenize the right whilst omitting the issues that reveal the entire truth—and in that complete truth wherein lies real solutions for the world’s greatest dilemma (incidentally, the National Review has condemned the alt right as racist and anti-Semitic). The only effective method for containing the Judeo-Masonic dilemma has been the Byzantine Solution, or the Vatican’s Sicut Judaeis Non, which would have to be expanded to include freemasonry and its many gnostic offshoots.

alex-jones-limited-hangoutInfowars’ Alex Jones is sort of the pioneer of 21st century limited hangout. He was doing it on an international stage long before the current alt right talking heads became as popular as they. It’s only because of Donald Trump and growing public disillusionment with the left that there is a need for a pantheon of limited hangout agents, who have now surpassed Jones in notoriety. Jones, apparently, was the beta test for the establishment’s plan for a rise of the pseudo right.

White nationalists appear to have completely bought into the alt right bait, with personalities like David Duke and Professor Kevin MacDonald riding the Trump, alt right bandwagon; although, MacDonald has demonstrated his awareness of the Jewish involvement in the alt right and is supporting it anyways likely for strategic reasons. White nationalist opposition to Judeo-Masonry has proven itself a failure (National Socialism) and is based in racialism. Only the Church has adequately addressed and dealt with the question. Any notion of the “true” alt right being hijacked from the supposed rightful heir white nationalists by Milo types is ridiculous. Neither of the two groups are the rightful heirs.

This alt right and its friendly alternative media are not allowing any other talking points to the reach the masses. Right wing sentiment must not deviate from what the establishment has set out. Dissenting views from the alt right narrative are regarded as divisive, anti-Trump, leftist, or they are simply ignored (dynamic silence). The alt right is a neocon of the necons—its controlled outgrowth that is a false attempt at a return to conservatism. The only true conservatism is one based not in secular populism but in Jesus Christ and the moral order.

anon-controlled-opposition-explained

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones CIA Mossad

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
 

Anyone who has taken on the frustrating task of trying to free the mind of an Alex Jones Infowars cult follower knows the typical resistive responses: “he tells a lot of truth”, “he is too well known to be killed”, “you are just cointelpro trying to divide the truth movement”, and the most hilarious one, “he doesn’t know any better”…I could go on and on with the list of excuses these poor brainwashed souls come up with.

It’s ironic that the mindset of members of the Church of Infowars is exactly the same as those who blindly follow the Jewish-controlled mainstream media. Church members have the audacity to project their own delusions onto the sheep of the mainstream flock. Knowing this should make it easier when selecting a strategy to use to awaken the Infowars sheep. In addition to addressing the underlying psychological condition that makes people susceptible to brainwashing, looking back in history and presenting a mountain of evidence against the subject in question should put a crack in the hardened toxic sludge that prevents truth from seeping into the brains of these sheep.

 

What we already know about Alex Jones

The evidence tells us that Alex Jones is a highly skilled counter-intelligence operative on the payroll of the state of Israel, via Stratfor and Mossad’s subordinate, the Central Intelligence Agency (Operation Mockingbird). He uses shock-and-awe expositions through his controlled-opposition media empire, with the goal of instilling fear in his listeners and hypnotizing them into a passive, lethargic trance. Jones has even admitted to having familial connections to the CIA. (Click the links, highlighted in red, for in-depth explanations.)

“Whenever I go to a family reunion, half the people in the room are former CIA.” —Alex Jones (The Opie and Anthony Show – 04-17-2013)

Incidentally, Jones gained a lot of his popularity early in his career by “predicting” the 9/11 attacks, of which, he later admitted he had “intel” on. What’s more, many of Jones’ guests on Infowars radio are either former or current intelligence and law enforcement officials. With all this chumming around with intelligence operatives, is it any wonder that he hired a CIA/Stratfor-connected editor in chief?

Another likelihood that has not yet been addressed by the alternative media is that Jones’ media empire functions to sequester opponents of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy (New World Order) and to streamline them into an identifiable and thus more manageable group. Jones and his followers often refer to themselves as “infowarriors”. This has various uses for the Elders of Zion, as we shall see.

 

perrynatreviewcoverThe CIA establishes the National Review to homogenize conservative schools

Shortly after the CIA was established in 1947, at the height of the Cold War and during US Congress’ attempted purge of Communists in America, CIA agent William F. Buckley Jr. and Trotskyite James Burnham founded the National Review magazine, which would go on to be the editorial mouthpiece of “conservatives” in America. Economist and historian Murray Rothbard writes,

“Not long after the Central Intelligence agency was founded in 1947, the American public and the world were subjected to an unprecedented level of propaganda in the service of the US foreign policy objectives in the Cold War…. At its peak, the CIA allocated 29 percent of hits budget to ‘media and propaganda’.”[I]

What’s more, historian Murray Friedman claims in The Neoconseravative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (2006) that National Review, despite its Catholic appearance, was run by Jews, specifically Frank Meyer, Frank Chodorov, Morrie Raskin, Marvin Liebman, and Willi Schlamm. Neoconservatism was and is a Jewish movement. It serves the same purpose as National Review. Historian E. Michael Jones writes,

National Review existed to destroy competing conservatisms, especially those incompatible with the international foreign policy establishment. National Review used conservatism to mobilize, certain ethnic groups, e.g., Catholics, behind government policies. It existed to colonize certain groups, to divide and conquer, and then get them to act against their own interests. NR was created to destroy isolationist conservatism. Conservatives who criticized America’s march to empire were demonized and decertified. National Review has shown undeviating consistency in this regard, the most recent example being David Frum’s diatribe against the paleoconservatives.”[II]

What E. Michael Jones describes here seems like an exact description of Alex Jones and Infowars, with NR’s streamlining of conservatism applicable also to the streamlining of conspiracists, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, resisters of the New World Order, etc. It’s important to note that National Review was founded for the purpose of serving the interests of both the CIA and Jews. This is also likely the case for Alex Jones and Infowars, as he has diffused any active resistance to the world government takeover and protected international Jews from any blame. As Jewish communist Vladimir Lenin admitted, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”

 “Much of what is attributed to William F. Buckley was the work of Jewish thinkers and financiers who…. Buckley was the goyishe front man for Trotskyite conservatism in the same way Gus Hall was the goyishe front man for American Communism…. Buckley was the ideological enforcer who would pronounce the political cherem on competing conservative sects and expel them from the synagogue. He was also the model for the Catholics he was to control by transforming them from recalcitrant ethnics into docile movement conservatives..His (Buckley) other job was to destroy any conservative movement not toeing the line of the internationalist establishment. All forms of ‘isolationism’ were anathema. It also meant and all out attack on anything ‘anti-Semitic'”[III]

As you can see, Alex Jones is the Zionist carbon copy of William F. Buckley. Jones is quick to call out anti-Semitism on his show and makes daily references to Hitler and the alleged Holocaust of six million Jews.

Infowars’ homogenizing effect

The conspirators gain several advantages by sequestering and homogenizing their opponents. First, opponents are told to think inside the box—the conspirator’s predesigned box, with “unity” being the catalyst for conformity. The group is also given an identity, from which, if anyone deviates, that individual will be ostracized from the group. This is especially useful for the conspirators if that individual clues in to what’s going on and tries to alert the group. The group then purges itself of the very individuals who pose a legitimate threat to the conspirators. In this way, the group is now helping the conspirators whilst believing they are working against them. Spend enough time around a Infowarrior and you soon see how any dissent within the group is quickly demonized and marginalized, the very same way it is with those who blindly follow the mainstream media. And Like National Review, Alex Jones provides gentile window dressing for what is actually a Jewish movement: his anarcho-libertarianism based in the Masonic US Constitution.

 

Operation Mockingbird/Cointelpro

counterintelligence1Operation Mockingbird came out in the 1950s shortly after the CIA was founded. It’s purpose was to influence the media. Both National Review and Encounter were likely creations of Project Mockingbird. Mockingbird was started by the Jewish Cord Meyer and Illuminati stooge Allen W. Dulles. Then-CIA director William Colby testified to the Church Committee, a United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, that there were over 400 CIA agents spreading disinformation through the media as a part of Mockingbird. If the purpose of National Review, according to E. Michael Jones, bears any resemblance to the objectives of Operation Mockingbird, then this CIA program is also a movement that advances Jewish interests. So, if Alex Jones is a much later and more sophisticated Operation Mockingbird creation, it would make sense why he deflects any Jewish blame for the evils going on in the world, has a host of Jewish sponsors and backers, and prevents opposition to the world conspiracy from gaining any legitimate momentum. It also corroborates those who say that Jones is an agent provocateur spreading disinformation and disrupting public protests, like the Austin gun rally in 2010. Jones completely fit the description of a CIA agent provocateur/agitator/cointelpro at this particular event, then pulled a psyop by claiming those offended by this act of treachery were the actual provocateurs. There are many more examples, but this one stands out. The stunt proved to be a failure for Jones and his handlers. Whether Jones was sent there to disrupt and cause trouble or whether Jones arrogantly believed he could rally and centralize the dissenters not already in the Church of Infowars (homogenizing effect), it’s difficult to tell for sure. You may have heard of psychiatrists saying non-conformists are mentally ill; well, on several occasions Jones has said the very same thing of those who accuse him of being a plant. This isn’t the behaviour of an objective journalist but of a cult leader or counter-intelligence operative.

Cointelpro, an acronym for “counter-intelligence program”, is an FBI program designed to achieve very much the same thing as Operation Mockingbird. Since the United States’ intelligence organizations work in tandem, it’s likely that the two programs blend with one another and fall under the umbrella of the mother intelligence lodge in Tel Aviv, Israel, specifically the Israeli Mossad’s psychological warfare division Lohamah Pscichlogit (LAP). Jones is likely also involved with Cointelpro. While he does talk about these intelligence programs in his documentary films and on his radio program, it’s difficult to see these supposed revelations as anything more than providing a convenient alibi for Jones. And it certainly achieves this. I don’t know how many times I have heard his cult members say something like, “but he talks about Mossad and Cointelpro”; therefore, we are expected to believe he couldn’t possibly be involved in them. Right… keep drinking the Kool-Aid.

 

[I] E. Michael Jones, “Manipulating Catholic Support for the War: The Black Operation Known as Conservatism,” in Neo-conned Again: Hypocrisy, Lawlessness, and the Rape of Iraq (Vienna, VA: I H S Press, 2005), p. 175.

[II] E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 864.

[III] Ibid, p. 866