Israel is a Kremlin decoy

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 12, 2019 Anno Domini

Jewish political power seems to be concentrated in the still-present, yet deceptively modified, Soviet collectivist system and not in the state of Israel, as most believe.

Israel is merely a branch of this Soviet system, albeit, an important one, and largely serves as a decoy to hide the Soviet origin of crimes against humanity.

The Russia Federation today is following the same Soviet pattern in using Israel as a fall guy for its crimes as it has done with China for decades; thereby, throwing analysts off the trail to Moscow and securing the unfettered advancement of Soviet plans.

With the staged theatrics of the Sino-Soviet split from 1956-1966, as part of the scissors strategy (the fake falling out between the two red powers), the Soviets effectively used China to cover up their leading role in crimes like its global narcotics offensive against the West. Even today, China is all too willing to not only portray itself as openly communist, but take the blame for any perceived subversion of the West, when, in fact, subversive directives appear to be coming from Moscow, whose regime hides under the thin mask of democracy. Notice how Western Right-wing media today obsesses on China but demonizes and denigrates anyone who criticizes Moscow? This is exactly the desired outcome of Soviet planning.

“These propaganda instructions were extended in 1964 in a letter signed by Leonid Brezhnev which was discussed at a meeting of the Czechoslovak Defence Council. The letter directed that data on the Chinese drug and narcotics trafficking operation should be made public, to advertise China’s role as the source of illicit trafficking and thus to draw attention away from the Soviet operation. (One of the first articles written for this purpose appeared in Pravda on September 13,1964. It was written by V. Ovchinnikov and was entitled ‘The Drug Dealers’: see also page 146, and Note 43, page 152).” (1)

So, then, why wouldn’t Russia do something similar with the state of Israel (or other groups, for that matter)? Israel is a nation founded by Bolshevik Jews and currently run by Bolshevik Jews, exemplified in the Soviet-derived Likud party headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Every Prime Minister of Israel to present time has had Soviet roots, the intelligence services of both Israel and Russia seem to be working side by side, and both powers are co-operating in building the biggest economic alliance the world has ever seen (one belt, one road initiative)—to name just a few of the many similarities between the two powers.

It seems that Russia’s primary uses for Israel are to: 

  1. Turn the world against the West (via indignation over Western support of Israel to the detriment of the Arab world) 
  2. Divide Westerners (anti-Zionist Leftists vs. pro-Zionist right wingers) 
  3. Displace Islamic world populations in order to facilitate the Soviet Kalergi Plan (via wars for Israel),
  4. Subvert Western political institutions (under the guise of Israel as a Western ally, i.e., Kim Philby, Jonathan Pollard). 
  5. Shepherd resulting Islamic anti-Zionism, anti-Americanism into terrorist cells against Weststern targets (actual and/or false flags)

Secondarily, the Bolsheviks may be using Israel to affirm masonic and Talmudic prophecy, centring around the City of Jerusalem. Unfortunately, well-meaning anti-Zionists get caught up in this secondary use, which forces their incorrect conclusions of the bigger picture. Also, whether intentional or not, Soviet Bolsheviks have utilized the existence of the state of Israel to demonize opponents of Jewish power as “Nazis” and/or “anti-Semites”.

Carefully, Russia has used Israel to turn the Middle East and Africa against Israel and, more importantly, the West while Russia waits in the wings to accept the seemingly helpless Arabs and Africans into its open arms, as explained by Jack Bernstein in the New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv triangle.

“From the terms of this pact, you can see it was, and still is, the aim of the Soviet Union and Zionist/Marxist Israel to prevent peace between the Arab countries and Israel until all the Arab countries are forced to adopt socialism under Soviet leadership.” (2)

Worst yet, Western conservatives have now also embraced Russia and the “former” Soviet bloc—naively believing that the crypto-Reds will save the world from the supposed Western-led New World Order. In other words, the Soviets have succeeded in turning both Lefitsts and right-wingers against their own government (a long-range Leninist goal), yet neither side can see this in its proper context (see: The Left’s fake anti-Russia narrative explained).

Although high-ranking Soviet defector Ion Mihai Pacepa doesn’t seem to understand Israel’s true role in the Soviet offensive, he does correctly identify Moscow’s leading role in Middle East turmoil and its intended negative effects on the West.

“’By 1972, Andropov’s disinformation machinery was working around the clock to persuade the Islamic world that Israel and the United States intended to transform the rest of the world into a Zionist fiefdom,” Pacepa writes of the Soviet’s Operation SIG. (3) “According to Andropov, the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch.” (4)

Pacepa goes on to reveal that the Soviets went as far as seeding Arabic-translated copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in the Arab world even though, previously, it was Soviet policy to imprison or execute those caught with this banned material. At home, it seems, the Soviets want to keep a lid on the Protocols but see its uses for consumption abroad. (For more on this aspect of Soviet Israel, please see my article The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel.)

Most people cannot understand this clever strategy. They might say, “why would Bolsheviks throw Bolsheviks under the bus?” If Israel weren’t thrown into the mix, the strategy would be too obvious. Imagine that Russia turned the Middle East against only the West but not Israel. You don’t think Western analysts would figure out that it were a Soviet measure? This is one of the reasons that Israel was created—to disguise the Soviet offensive against the West and the plan for world communism. It’s no coincidence that Israel and the West almost always gets fingered for all world events by both the Left and the Right: Israel/CIA killed JFK, not Russia; Israel/CIA did 9/11, not Russia; Israel/CIA is oppressing the Palestinians, not Russia; Israel/CIA conducts false-flag terrorism, not Russia; Israel/CIA manufactures and distributes narcotics, not Russia; Israel/CIA runs sexual blackmail operations, not Russia…. Hopefully you get the point. But just about everything Israel is accused of, there is evidence that the Soviet system is responsible.

What if Russia, like it has done with China, deliberately made public information implicating Israel in Kremlin crimes, like 9/11, for example? Isn’t it just a little suspicious that the Israel-friendly right-wing mainstream media reported Israelis dancing on a roof top as the World Trade Centre collapsed, Israeli spying in America just prior to 9/11 (Carl Cameron of Fox News), and suspicious Israelis arrested on 9/11? I’m not suggesting that Israelis weren’t involved but that their role may deliberately have been exaggerated so as to eliminate any possible trail back to Moscow. Or take JFK conspiracy theories. Most of them centre around blaming either the CIA (which fits the anti-Western Soviet narrative) or, in the alt right, Israel. Talk of Soviet orchestration is nearly completely absent from the debate.

As it stands today, analyzing the Soviet threat outside of the narrative of China and North Korea is off limits. While the fake collapse of communism provides the primary protection for Soviet Russia’s continued advancedment of world communism, Soviet Israel provides the added layer.

Notes:

  1. Douglass, Jospeh D., Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West,1999, pg. 41
  2. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, 1984, The Noontide Press, California, pg. 23
  3. Pacepa, Ion Mihai, Disinformation, 
  4. Pacepa, Ion Mihai, Russian Footprints, National Review Online, August 24, 2006 – https://web.archive.org/web/20100715214448/http://article.nationalreview.com/289014/russian-footprints/ion-mihai-pacepa 

Leninist Aesopian speech

By Christopher Story
June 19, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States, pg. XXXIX (1997)

Lenin was most exacting of the language and style of agitation and propaganda. He demanded that the language of articles and books should be impeccable…. Before him, history had not known a politician who made such effective use of the spoken word in the interests of the revolutionary transformation of society’ [from ‘Lenin on Language’, Raduga Publishers, Moscow, 1983]. However, typically, Lenin did not encourage such exactitude in order to clarify matters: on the contrary, he was exacting in his use of language in order to obfuscate – and to create a means of communicating with those whom he called ‘the interested’ (the revolutionaries), while still using ordinary, everyday language, to which the Tsarist censors could hardly object. By the use of this dialectical means of communication, which contained hidden meanings, the ‘enemy’ could be charmed, deluded, misled and lied to, while the interested’ could simultaneously be instructed as required by the strategists.

Among vehicles used for the issuance of Kremlin directives, one of the most widely employed outside the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc has been ‘World Marxist Review’, in which language is used with Leninist care. Another crucial source of information on the continuing Revolution is the Russian Foreign Ministry’s journal ‘International

Affairs’, also written in Lenin’s ‘two-faced’ language, which provides detailed continuing insights into Soviet revolutionary policy, tactics, strategy and intentions: if Western analysts were aware of Lenin’s ‘special way of writing’, and were prepared to spend the necessary time reading and analysing ‘International Affairs’, they would be able to acquire Golitsyn-like expertise in interpreting events and predicting the likely course of Soviet tactics or strategy. One reason for Western blindness is ignorance about Lenin’s ‘Aesopian language’.

So the Leninists’ ‘Aesopian language’, alluded to in this work, requires some brief explanation. In the Preface to the Russian Edition of ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism’ [26th April 1917], Lenin wrote: ‘I was not only forced to confine myself strictly to an exclusively theoretical, mainly economic analysis of facts, but to formulate a few necessary observations on politics with extreme caution, by hints, in that Aesopian language – in that cursed Aesopian language – to which Tsarism compelled all revolutionaries to have recourse whenever they took up their pens to write a “legal” work’ [i.e., a work which would not be censored or banned by the Tsarist authorities as illegal -Ed.]. Following this passage, Lenin appended a Note, which reads as follows: “Aesopian”, after the Greek fable writer, Aesop, was the term applied to the allusive and roundabout style adopted in “legal” publications by revolutionaries in order to evade the censorship’.

That this method of communication has been used by the Leninists ever since is obvious from the language of double-meanings used by Gorbachev, Kozyrev and other contemporary Leninists – ‘perestroika’ being the most conspicuous case in point. The Soviets encouraged the West to believe that ‘perestroika’ meant ‘restructuring’, as in ‘restructuring of the economy’; which it did. But ‘perestroika’ also meant something entirely different to ‘the interested’; and its second meaning was quite legitimate: to Gorbachev’s ‘interested’, ‘perestroika’ meant ‘re-formation’, as in ‘military formation’: so that its hidden meaning was ‘we are ‘re-forming’, in order more effectively to prevail over all who are opposed to Communism. That this was the case was made clear by Carl Bloice, the Kremlin correspondent of the CPUSA’s ‘People’s Weekly World’ [see page 62]. Citing Lenin, he wrote in May 1991 that the Soviet Leninists were engaged in ‘drawing back in order to make better preparations for a new offensive’.

New York—Moscow—Tel Aviv Triangle


By Jack Bernstein
An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (1984 Anno Domini)
Pages 21-25

At this point, you may be confused, Israel and the Soviets are ideological allies – both follow the ideas of Karl Marx, so both are communist/socialist. Yet, the Soviets supplied military equipment to the Arabs—Israel’s enemies; and at the same time, the Soviet Union’s enemy, the United States, was arming Israel.

To understand the treachery which Zionist/ Bolshevik Jews are capable and to understand the treachery which took place before and during the 1973 War, I must explain the New York/ Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle. To do so, it is necessary to go back a few years in history.

A heavy migration of Jews from Russia to America started in 1831. Most of these were communist Jews. So many of these communist/Bolshevik Jews settled in New York City that New York has been referred to as ‘Moscow on the Hudson.’

It has been pointed out, and with good reason, that decisions regarding communist policies come not from Moscow, but from New York City. Whether this is a fact or not is immaterial. What is important is the fact that there is a close tie between the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews in New York City and the Zionist/ Bolshevik Jews in Moscow, and extending to include the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews who dominate Israel’s government.

A brief look at Israel’s Soviet-derived leadership. (Photo illustration by Jon Swinn.)

The Zionist power over the U.S. Government in Washington, D.C. stems from the Zionist/ Bolsheviks centered in New York City. It is from New York that orders go out to the vast Zionist network all over the U.S. – a network that influences the economic and political affairs of not only our federal government, but nearly all, if not all,state governments, and to a great extent the governments of the larger and even medium sized cities. This power of the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews over the U.S. makes the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/ Tel Aviv Triangle a tremendous influence over communist policies.

In viewing the 1973 War, most people—and it seems most Arabs—are of the impression that since Soviet Russia sold equipment to Egypt and other Arab countries, the Soviets were in support of the Arabs in the 1973 War. This is a false impression. To understand that this is the result of more deceit on the part of Israel and the Soviet Union, you must be aware of the Golda Meir – Stalin/Kaganovich Pact.

Meir

Golda Meir had been born in Russia, grew up in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and in 1921 migrated to Israel. In 1949, Golda Meir became Israel’s first ambassador to the Soviet Union.

Representing Israel, Ambassador Golda Meir, a Bolshevik Jewess, met with two representatives of the Soviet Union: Kaganovich, a Bolshevik Jew, and Stalin, who had married a Bolshevik Jewess. They made a secret agreement—a pact.

Israel’s part of the pact was:

1. Israel would not allow any Western country, especially the U.S., to build military bases on Israeli territory.

2. Israel would allow an official communist party to function freely in Israel.

3. Israel would not make any agreement to solve the Palestinian problem.

4. Israel would influence world Jewry, especially in the U.S. to have Western powers adopt a policy of favoring Israel over the Arabs.

5. Israel was to continue its Marxist economic policies and prevent any free-enterprise tendencies.

Soviet Union’s part of the pact was:

1. The Soviets would institute a pro-Arab policy solely as a camouflage for its true intentions, which was to furnish aid to the Arabs, but never enough to enable the Arabs to destroy Israel.

2. The Soviets would open the gates of Soviet satellite countries to Jewish immigration to Israel. Should this be insufficient, Soviet Russia then would open its own gates to emigration.

3. The Soviets would absolutely guarantee the security of Israel.
** Both the Soviet Union and Israel would exchange intelligence reports.

From the terms of this pact, you can see it was, and still is, the aim of the Soviet Union and Zionist/Marxist Israel to prevent peace between the Arab countries and Israel until all the Arab countries are forced to adopt socialism under Soviet leadership.

In the conduct of the 1973 War, you can see part of this deceitful agreement being utilized, in particular, the part about the Soviet Union helping the Arabs – but not helping enough to defeat Israel.

In planning the 1967 War, Israel was aware that the Arab countries bordering Israel were buying equipment from the Soviets, an Israeli ally. But, because of the Golda Meir – Stalin/Kaganovlch Pact, Israeli leaders knew the Soviets would not help the Arabs enough to defeat Israel—that the aid the Soviets were giving the Arabs was only ‘bait’ to draw the Arab countries into the Soviet trap. Also, Israeli leaders knew that their American Zionist brethren were making sure the U.S. government was supplying enough arms to stop the Arabs; and would send more equipment, even troops if necessary.

When the 1973 War started, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and Iraq surprised Israel with their improved fighting capability.

Moscow General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU Leonid Brezhnev meets President of Egypt Anvar al-Sadat in the airport in 1972. Photo TASS / Valentin Mastyukov; Alexei Stuzhin (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

The Egyptian Army faced what would seem an impossible task in its attempt to penetrate Israeli territory.

First, there was the water barrier, the Suez Canal, to cross. Then, they would face a high wall of sand and fine dust which was erected by Israel. Behind that wall was a third barrier—a line of Israeli fortifications. These fortifications were stronger than the Maginot Line erected by France before World War II to stop any German invasion of France.

Yet, by ingenuity, the Egyptian Army crossed the Suez Canal, went over the sand and dust barrier and broke through the heavy fortifications in a matter of a few hours.

Israel was in trouble; the Arabs were winning the war.

But, as pre-planned – If necessary, the U.S. airlifted huge amounts of military equipment and supplies to Israel and, as I mentioned before, the U.S. Airborne Division at Ft. Bragg, N.C. and U.S. troops stationed in Germany were placed on alert and would have been sent to help the Israeli forces if it became necessary to help Israel win the war. Fortunately for America, American troops weren’t needed to help Israel survive. The additional arms were enough. However, the Arab forces were strong enough to stop Israel from taking over more Arab land. In fact, Egypt was able to take back part of the Sinai.

Egypt’s president Sadat realized that the Soviets had no intention of helping the Arabs win the war; that the Soviets in selling them some equipment were only trying to trap Egypt in the Soviet net. So, Sadat kicked Soviet military advisors and civilian technicians out of Egypt.