The Perestroika Deception: Behind the Mask – part I

Putin is a proven fraud and communist, Russia and China in final preparations for military conquest of the West

Part II

By ‘Child of the Immaculata’ Apocalypse 12:17
July 7, 2019 Anno Domini

A truly peaceful nation does not speak and act in warrior terms. Although the East expends much effort in pretence of virtue, in script of the long-range communist deception strategy or ‘Perestroika Deception’, as revealed (with a predictive success of 94%) by Soviet defector Mr Anatoliy Golitysn (1), the mask slips. This is unavoidable, because as Our Blessed Lord said in Divine wisdom:

“For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh……….By their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 12:34-35 & 7:16)

Accordingly, Putin in clearly presaged delectation of Western conquest and the ravages of war, told Western journalists in 2008 that their wives should learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup’:

“He told Western observers who refused to monitor the forthcoming election, widely seen as a sham, that they should ‘
rather teach their own wives how to cook cabbage soup.’ (2)
In 2016, he revealed his true communist credentials, in declaring his like of communist and socialist doctrine:

‘You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,’ Putin said, referring to the KGB ‘
I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity’ he said. “I liked communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”(3)
 
Also in 2016, Putin made public evangelisation illegal.(4) Mr. Hannu Haukka, President of Great Commission Media Ministries, said, “This new situation resembles the Soviet Union in 1929. At that time, confession of faith was permitted only in church.”

And in 2018, in further affirmation that his apparent ‘Christianity’ is totally fake (5), he compared the mausoleum of Lenin with a Christian relic: “Putin went further by comparing the Communists’ attitude to the Bolshevik leader Lenin to the veneration of saints in Christianity. ‘Look, Lenin was put in a mausoleum.How is this different from the relics of saints for Orthodox Christians and just for Christians?”(6)

Putin’s words were music to the ears of Communist Party members. ‘I think these words of the president very effectively and reasonably smooth out the acute angles around the theme of the mausoleum’, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Ivan Melnikov said on Sunday, as cited by Interfax.

Earlier this year, Gennadiy Zyuganov, the head of the Russian Communist Party, said Putin had promised him that as long as he remains president, Lenin’s body would remain in the mausoleum in Red Square.

“As long as I sit here, there will be no barbarism in Red Square’ the Communist chief quoted Putin as saying at a conference with Russian party leaders.”

The fundamental identity of communism is hatred of God, externalised in violence, destruction, death and enslavement of men. As Marx said in excerpt of his poems:

I have power within my youthful arms
To clench and crush you with tempestuous force.
See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me.
 
If there is a something which devours, 
I’ll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins.
The world which bulks between me and the abyss,
I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly,
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action,

My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

 
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.(7) 

In his annual Presidential address on 1st March 2018, Putin displayed aggressive flex of Russian (ie. Soviet) ‘tempestuous force’ and ‘fire and action’. He said, ‘It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen to us now!”

For almost an hour in this speech, we see a peacock show of weaponry (from 1 hr 15 m 15 s). Note also that the delivery aircraft for his new ‘dagger’ missile system has the Soviet 5 pointed red-star on the tail-fin! (1 hr 38 m 21 s) And of course, his speech was inter-laced with the usual anti-Western propaganda and characterisation of the US especially, as aggressor.


The communist show of military might was the mark of the Soviets, before they implemented the ‘Perestroika Deception’. And as we see in their ‘victory day’ celebrations in Red Square this year, the same is true today (note the prominent hammer and sickle emblem in the lead photo of this article). Watch the a 17 minute video in reference (8). The fundamental to the whole parade was simply virulent military power.

What about Russia’s ally China? We see here  Karl Marx’s 200th birthday as celebrated in 2018 by the Chinese regime. In the forefront President Xi, who as with Gorbachev, has been cast in his role in deceit of his ‘avuncular’ appearance.

In January 2018, they conducted an ostentatious exercise in display of their military strength. (9) Ominously, Xi stated that the military should:
“create an elite and powerful force that is always ready for the fight, capable of combat and sure to win in order to fulfil the tasks bestowed by the Partyand not to fear death.”

Anatoliy Golitysn warned that alliance between Russia and China, is the final step before communist confrontation of the West:

‘Before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favour. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet “reconciliation.” The element of apparent duality in Soviet and Chinese policies will disappear. The hitherto concealed coordination between them will become visible and predominant. The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of one clenched fist to provide the foundation and driving force of a world communist federation. At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable.(10)

It is clear we have reached this stage!

September 2018

‘Russia has launched what it has called its largest ever military drills, with hundreds of thousands of troops joining Chinese soldiers.

Taking part in the drills are around 300,000 Russian soldiers, 36,000 military vehicles, 80 ships and 1,000 aircraft, helicopters and drones, as well as 3,500 Chinese troops.’ (10)

June 2019

‘Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping. Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin praised their countries’ ties during talks at the Kremlin, as Russia and China seek to shore up cooperation amid shared tensions with the United States.’President Putin is for me a best friend.’ Xi told journalists.’ (11)

Conclusion:

For those hood-winked that Putin is a virtuous Christian, then this falsehood is annulled in evidence above. His pretence of apparent ‘Christianity’ is faked to deceive the West, concomitant with the strategy to denigrate the West as evil and exalt the East in virtue, in self-justification for their pending attack on the West. Note there was no mention of God in his 2018 Presidential address. Only a display of hard military power for his communist audience, who in some cases exhibited frissons of exultation as Putin unveiled the new power of the Soviet fist. This is their first measure of national pride!

The ‘East good/West bad’ propaganda strategy has been revealed by Putin’s close confidante Alexander Dugin (12) of whom we should note, was condemned by the Russian Orthodox Church as a disciple of the satanist Aleister Crowley (12a) It has also been admitted by Margarita Simonyan, who is the the head of the media propaganda organ RT (13).

The truth of Putin is exposed by Sacred Scripture:

“For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)

Indeed, Putin as chief administrator of the ‘Perestroika Deception’, stands ready to destroy 5000 years of Western civilisation and take billions of lives. He is an anti-christ of the first grade and an acolyte of the communist ‘saint’ Lenin. As the Hungarian communist Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner (d. 1944) wrote in a poem; (14) THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN! LENIN! Gorbachev stated in a speech on the 15th November 1989 – SIX DAYS AFTER THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL; (15)

“We are for Lenin who is alive!” In order to achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society.

Well, the new society they intend is technocratic, communist enslavement for the entire world!

As Anatoliy Golitsyn said: ‘In the new worldwide communist federation the present different brands of communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism.’

So help us God!

In part 2, we will examine the East’s strategy of conquest for the West. Again, please distribute this information and in personal sacrifice of your reputation to a blinded world, if needs be. God gives much grace for such sacrifice (Mark 3:21).

 

References:

1)  Soviet analyst Mr Christopher Story (RIP) – video expounding Soviet multi-decade communist deception strategy.

‘The Perestroika Deception’ by Mr Anatoliy Golitsyn.

https://www.chinhnghia.com/GOLITSYN(Anatoliy)-Perestroika_Deception_(1998).pdf

2) Putin tells Western wives to learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup.’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578802/Vladimir-Putins-nuclear-threat-to-the-West.html

3) Putin still likes communist and socialist ideas very much.

https://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

4) Putin signs law banning evangelism outside of churches.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/thousands-fasting-after-russian-president-putin-signs-law-banning-evangelism-outside-of-churches.html

5) Article Fitzpatrick Informer – Putin is a fake christian.

https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/sanhedrin-addresses-putin-as-jewish-king/

6) Putin compares mausoleum of Lenin with a christian relic.

https://www.rt.com/news/415883-putin-communist-ideology-christianity/

https://www.rt.com/russia/398319-putin-promised-to-keep-lenin/

7) Poetry of Karl Marx

https://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/marx.htm

8) Soviet ‘Victory Day’ parade 2019 – note at 10 m 49s, a young girl waving a Soviet flag and with a hammer and sickle brooch on her hat!

9) China war preparations.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2018/jan/04/xi-jinping-chinese-army-to-strengthen-war-preparedness-video

10) Anatoliy Golitysin – Russia/China ‘one-clenched fist’ strategy.

The Clenched Fist—Revisiting Golitsyn’s Predictions

11) Russia conducts largest ever military exercise with China.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/11/russia-largest-ever-military-exercise-300000-soldiers-china

11) Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping.

12) Alexander Dugin – ‘to gain victory over the US in the coming ‘Great War’ is to use its vast media operations and assets in the alternative media to portray America as irredeemably evil.’

Dugin’s Published Plan to Destroy the West

12a) Dugin recites praises to satan from text of satanist Aleister Crowley.

13) RT’s chief editor, Margarita Simonyan, has said that the network she manages is like ‘a defence ministry’ and capable of ‘conducting information war against the whole Western world.’

RT Forces Employees to 20 years of Silence

14) Communist, freemason and Jew Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner – THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN ! LENIN!

https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter4.html

15) Gorbachev speech – ‘We are for a Lenin who is alive!’

https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/category/forward-not-back/

Leninist Aesopian speech

By Christopher Story
June 19, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States, pg. XXXIX (1997)

Lenin was most exacting of the language and style of agitation and propaganda. He demanded that the language of articles and books should be impeccable…. Before him, history had not known a politician who made such effective use of the spoken word in the interests of the revolutionary transformation of society’ [from ‘Lenin on Language’, Raduga Publishers, Moscow, 1983]. However, typically, Lenin did not encourage such exactitude in order to clarify matters: on the contrary, he was exacting in his use of language in order to obfuscate – and to create a means of communicating with those whom he called ‘the interested’ (the revolutionaries), while still using ordinary, everyday language, to which the Tsarist censors could hardly object. By the use of this dialectical means of communication, which contained hidden meanings, the ‘enemy’ could be charmed, deluded, misled and lied to, while the interested’ could simultaneously be instructed as required by the strategists.

Among vehicles used for the issuance of Kremlin directives, one of the most widely employed outside the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc has been ‘World Marxist Review’, in which language is used with Leninist care. Another crucial source of information on the continuing Revolution is the Russian Foreign Ministry’s journal ‘International

Affairs’, also written in Lenin’s ‘two-faced’ language, which provides detailed continuing insights into Soviet revolutionary policy, tactics, strategy and intentions: if Western analysts were aware of Lenin’s ‘special way of writing’, and were prepared to spend the necessary time reading and analysing ‘International Affairs’, they would be able to acquire Golitsyn-like expertise in interpreting events and predicting the likely course of Soviet tactics or strategy. One reason for Western blindness is ignorance about Lenin’s ‘Aesopian language’.

So the Leninists’ ‘Aesopian language’, alluded to in this work, requires some brief explanation. In the Preface to the Russian Edition of ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism’ [26th April 1917], Lenin wrote: ‘I was not only forced to confine myself strictly to an exclusively theoretical, mainly economic analysis of facts, but to formulate a few necessary observations on politics with extreme caution, by hints, in that Aesopian language – in that cursed Aesopian language – to which Tsarism compelled all revolutionaries to have recourse whenever they took up their pens to write a “legal” work’ [i.e., a work which would not be censored or banned by the Tsarist authorities as illegal -Ed.]. Following this passage, Lenin appended a Note, which reads as follows: “Aesopian”, after the Greek fable writer, Aesop, was the term applied to the allusive and roundabout style adopted in “legal” publications by revolutionaries in order to evade the censorship’.

That this method of communication has been used by the Leninists ever since is obvious from the language of double-meanings used by Gorbachev, Kozyrev and other contemporary Leninists – ‘perestroika’ being the most conspicuous case in point. The Soviets encouraged the West to believe that ‘perestroika’ meant ‘restructuring’, as in ‘restructuring of the economy’; which it did. But ‘perestroika’ also meant something entirely different to ‘the interested’; and its second meaning was quite legitimate: to Gorbachev’s ‘interested’, ‘perestroika’ meant ‘re-formation’, as in ‘military formation’: so that its hidden meaning was ‘we are ‘re-forming’, in order more effectively to prevail over all who are opposed to Communism. That this was the case was made clear by Carl Bloice, the Kremlin correspondent of the CPUSA’s ‘People’s Weekly World’ [see page 62]. Citing Lenin, he wrote in May 1991 that the Soviet Leninists were engaged in ‘drawing back in order to make better preparations for a new offensive’.

The Little-Understood Struggle Between Stalin-Era Soviet Communism and Zionism

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 144-154

The twin forces of Bolshevism and Zionism have often collaborated on many fronts throughout the 20th century—both alien forces having evolved in the closing years of the 19th century. However,there have been conflicts between the two philosophies that remain little understood even by many who have devoted much study to both forces.

While there are many who view Bolshevism and Zionism as two heads of a single snake (and a two-headed snake does, in fact, exist, as biologists have reported) the realities of 20th century geopolitical struggles suggest that there is much more to the story.

In fact, there were sharp differences between the Russian nationalists (led by Josef Stalin) and the Jewish internationalists led by Stalin’s arch-enemy, Leon Trotsky.

By the time of the Cold War, following the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel in 1948, many traditional Trotskyites began a trans-mogrification process, evolving, particularly in the United States, into the leaders of an anti-Stalinist element that emerged as the hard-line pro- Israel bloc that came to be known as today’s “neo-conservatives.”

This is, of course, a cursory overview of a complicated and often confusing international struggle between revolutionary elements, both of which have been hostile to American interests. A detailed history of this struggle would go far beyond the purview of this volume. However, the fact remains that the modern-day disciples of Trotskyism are key figures among The Enemy Within, twisting old-fashioned conservatism into a divisive and destructive force that is utilizing America’s military might, the blood of its children, and its national treasure to enforce a global Zionist imperium—in short, a New World Order.

At the time of Stalin’s death in 1953—the circumstances of which suggest that he was certainly “helped” to his death—the Soviet leader was becoming openly and actively hostile to political Zionism. According to a July 27, 1967 report published in the American Examiner, the Jewish Telegraph Agency reported that:

Josef Stalin died 14 years ago of a rage caused when the Politburo opposed his proposal that all Russian Jews be expelled to Siberia, The Detroit News has reported from Washington . . . The story alleged that Stalin called a secret Politburo meeting to announce a campaign against the Jews. He said measures should be taken to deport Jews en masse to Biro Bidjan in Siberia . . .

Lazar Kaganovich, [the] only Jewish member of the Politburo and Stalin’s brother-in-law, tore up his party card and threw the pieces in Stalin’s face, said The News.

The report said that Stalin then turned purple with rage . . . Stalin rose from his chair, according to the account, began screaming incoherently and fell unconscious.An hour later, physicians pronounced him dead.

Although this teasingly and provocatively written news report—aimed at Jewish audiences—never said, flat out, that Stalin had been murdered, the intent of the report was very clear: in short, that Zionist interests in Russia had murdered the Soviet strongman because he was planning new offensives against Zionism.

In their 2003 book, Stalin’s Last Crime, Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Naumov published evidence that Stalin was almost certainly murdered in 1953 after he began moving toward exorcising Zionist influence in Soviet circles of power.

Describing Stalin’s moves against the Zionist elements in Russia, Brent and Naumov wrote that if Stalin had not been removed from power,“much subsequent world history might have been quite different.” They added:

Many leading Kremlin figures would have been purged and probably shot; the security services and the military would have been decimated by purges; Soviet intellectuals and artists, particularly Jews, would have been mercilessly suppressed; and the surviving remnant of Soviet and Eastern European Jewry would have been gravely (perhaps mortally) imperiled, while grievous suffering would have been inflicted on all the citizens of the Soviet Union. Another Great Terror, such as occurred in the late 1930s, was averted when Stalin suddenly died on March 5, 1953. Stalin’s version of a “final solution” remained unfulfilled . . .

And although even today there are those—including many legitimate and traditional American anti-communists—who believe Stalin was actually in alliance with Zionist interests, as evidenced by his immediate recognition of the State of Israel, Brent and Naumov comment that in 1948,“The Jews and Israel were not yet the enemies of the Soviet state they soon became.” So the point is this: a very real rift—one long in development—between Stalin and the Zionist (and Trotskyite) elements was very much a reality, popular legend notwithstanding.

In fact, by 1952, when Stalin was intensifying his public (and behind-the-scenes) campaign against Zionism in Russia, Brent and Naumov point out that the irony that many American Jewish spies for the Soviet Union would have found it hard to imagine that they were working for “a country whose leaders soon thereafter would turn against the entire Jewish population of the Soviet Union and, at the high- est governmental levels, was seriously considering the idea of the detention and deportation of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent people.”

In fact, in the Jan/Feb 2003 issue of The Barnes Review—the Revisionist history journal published by Willis A. Carto—Russian nationalist historian, Dr.OlegPlatonov, offered readers a fascinating history of Russia’s historic troubles with Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Bolshevik agitation—the proverbial two-headed snake. Platonov, asserted, flat-out, that Stalin had indeed launched a major offensive against Zionism.The words of Platonov, one of the leading Russian intellectuals today, and who is in the forefront of the fight against Zionist influence in 21st Century Russia, are worth reviewing. Platonov wrote:

The Jewish-Bolshevik rule over Russia was broken by Stalin who, in the second half of the 1930s, carried out a counter-revolution and stripped the carriers of the Zionist ideology of their power. In the 1930s and 1940s, no less than 800,000 Jewish Bolsheviks were annihilated under the leadership of Stalin—the elite of the anti-Russian organization which had planned to transform Russia into a Jewish state. Nearly all Jewish leaders were purged, and the chances of the remaining ones to regain power were reduced to a minimum.The last years of Stalin’s life were dedicated to the uprooting of Zionism and the liquidation of the organizations associated with it.

Dr. Platonov added these highly relevant details:

After Stalin’s death, everything changed abruptly. The state was taken over by people bent on the restoration of Jewish Bolshevism . . .The renaissance of Zionism continued during the entire government of N. S. Khruschev.

The situation somewhat improved under Brezhnev, who secretly limited the number of Jews in government positions. As a matter of fact, these measures were rarely put into practice, and both secret and open Zionists found many ways to elude them.

From the 1950s to the 1970s, a powerful fifth column spearheaded by the carriers of the Zionist ideology arose in Russia. Many of its leading figures were sons or grandsons of Bolshevik revolutionaries.

These very people later became the most active elements of the so-called perestroika, which led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the assumption of political power by the Jews and the transfer of a considerable part of Russia’s national wealth to foreign countries.

Today, of course, the fight against Zionist influence in Russia has expanded considerably, and Russia’s current president,Vladimir Putin, is increasingly under the gun from American-based (and worldwide) Zionist elements who view the so-called“Russian strongman”as a potential threat. (In a later chapter, we’ll discuss Putin further.)

The point that we need to focus on—and which must be emphasized—is that the break between Stalin and the Zionists, which began in the 1930s and which reached a fever pitch at the time of Stalin’s assassination in 1953, led specifically to events in the United States which played a major part in behind-the-scenes intrigue in the so-called “Cold War.“ This led to the establishment of the power bloc that today—in the 21st century—is known as the “neo-conservative” movement: that is, the Zionist-Trotskyite globalist warmongers who are using the wealth and power of the United States to enforce their world imperium.

In 1914, no less than V. I. Lenin wrote of Trotsky:“Comrade Trotsky has never yet possessed a definite opinion on any single, earnest Marxian question: he has always crept into the breach made by this or that difference, and has oscillated from one side to another.” And this reflects precisely the way so many American Trotskyites—who became the neo-conservatives—actually shifted their own agenda in order to fit with the times, particularly as elements within the Soviet government continued, behind the scenes, to agitate against Zionist influence.

So although many American anti-communists (and outright anti- Zionists and anti-Semites) were caught up in the theory that Soviet Communism (even under Stalin) had been largely a “Jewish” project, so to speak, there were a few discerning voices who recognized that the fight between Stalin and Trotsky had a definitive“Jewish slant”that need- ed to be examined in careful context.

In the late 1950s, John H. Monk, the American nationalist and frankly anti-Semitic editor of the Texas-based journal, Grass Roots, published a remarkable essay entitled “Let Us Look Into This Thing Called ‘Trotsky Communism.’” He concluded after an extensive review of the history of the conflict between Stalin and Trotsky that, put simply: “Trotsky Communism and Soviet Communism are enemies.” In Soviet Russia, as Monk noted, beginning in the late 1930s, “top ranking Jews began at that time toppling from their high seats,” and that “Russia at last had gotten her eyes open [and that] the good work started in 1928 with the exiling of Trotsky” by Josef Stalin. He added, quite pointedly:

Just recently, the Anti-Defamation League issued a special bulletin in which it wept sorely because the Russian Jews used to fill, back in 1935, ten percent of the high seats in the empire, and now they have only “one half of one per- cent” and it is shaky. No wonder the American Jew-Trotsky gang invented the slogan:“Down with Communism!”They mean Russia.

Monk pointed out that the Zionist movement and affiliated groups such as the ADL had quickly aligned themselves with the Trotskyite movement that set up shop in the United States—in New York City in particular—upon Trotsky’s exile from Russia.“If we run with the Trotsky Communist slogan, ‘Down with the Communists,” we automatically become partisans of the filthiest underground that has ever existed any- where on this earth:Trotsky Communism.”

Monk’s essays on this controversial topic were even reprinted by famed Lyrl Clark Van Hyning in her popular Women’s Voice newsletter, which no one ever accused of being a “communist” journal.

On September 15, 1969, writing in the popular American nationalist newspaper, Common Sense, which had, over the years, frequently featured the works of outspoken Jewish-born American anti-Zionist spokesman Benjamin Freedman, one Morris Horton (under his pen name “Fred Farrell”) wrote a fascinating assessment of the reality of Trotskyite Communism. Horton wrote in part:

Originally “Communism” was nothing but a tool of the wealthy American Jews of New York. In the United States, and in much of the rest of the world, it is still just that. Let us now address ourselves to a question important to anyone who really wants to understand Communism:“What is the difference between a Stalinist and a Trotskyite? Some people will tell you:“All Communists are alike.”

This is a dangerous piece of shallow misinformation. It is acceptable only if you are willing to substitute shallow sloganeering for real knowledge.A Stalinist represents primordial Russian nationalism. A Trotskyite represents the Jewish interests of New York City. The Jewish interests of New York suffered a terrific setback one day many years ago, when a taciturn hood planted an ax in Leon Trotsky’s skull in a villa in Mexico.

The world Communist conspiracy is not a Russian conspiracy; it is an American Jewish conspiracy.Today it is falling into great disrepute around the world. America is being blamed for supporting communism around the world. Unhappily, the charge is true. New York is the real hub of the conspiracy. If some of our Anti-Communists would stand up four square and tell this plain truth, we might possibly yet be liberated from Jewish misrule. Few of them ever do.

Most of the Communists and many of the Anti- Communists are on the same payroll, the Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other.The first basic rule of this sham battle is:“Never drag any real truth into the matter on either side; tell anything else you want to tell, but never tell the truth.” This is the basic background of most of the phony “experts” on Communism who have been “experting” about it for forty years and haven’t made a dent in it.

Horton was particularly adamant in pointing out that the American “anti-Communist” movement was increasingly falling into the hands of very real Communists—the Trotskyites—who in the guise of “fighting Communism” were actually working to introduce it into the American system.This is a point that few anti-communists understood then and even today they find it difficult to digest. Horton wrote:

These people generate the literature on Communism that is generally available to the American public.They have no interest in providing any genuinely valid information. Their aim is to manipulate public opinion.

Therefore, they seek to divide the Gentile.They seek to make the middle class believe that the working class is allied to Red Russia; All of this is, and always was, pure hallucination, generated by Jewish intellectual quacks in order to pro- mote a minority tyranny over the American Majority.

In his essay, Horton emphasized that the age-old labels of “Right” and “Left” no longer had any real meaning—a point that even many legitimate and self-styled modern-day American “conservatives” of the 21st century have yet to realize:

There is no genuine validity in either the “Right” or “Left” positions in politics. These are artificial, Jew-invented positions. Jewish control of communications is absolutely essential to the success of this power system. Jewish political quackery would not long survive exposure.

The Right-Left Age is the Jewish Age, and it is an age which, on the world stage, is now receding into the past. If America continues to live in this Jewish past, then America has no future.

Horton’s words—written nearly 50 years ago—continue to reverberate. But to drive home the point further, it is worth reviewing a trans- lation of an analysis of Zionism published in Spanish in the November 4, 1979 edition of Granma, the official newspaper voice of the communist regime of Cuba’s Fidel Castro.

(Similar versions of this had previously appeared in the Soviet Union, at a time when there were increasing public noises against Zionism, much to the dismay of the American Trotskyites who were then reinventing themselves as “the neo-conservatives.”

While this analysis from the communist point of view has been superceded by the collapse of the Soviet empire as it existed when this document was first published, it contains fascinating insights into the sources of tension between Zionism and Communism.

The Zionist movement, created by the Jewish big bourgeoisie at the end of the 19th century, was born with a decidedly counterrevolutionary purpose. From the founding of the World Zionist Organization in 1897 to the present, Zionism, as ideology and political practice, has opposed the world revolutionary process.

Zionism is counterrevolutionary in a global sense in that it acts the world over against the three major forces of revolution: the socialist community, the working class movement in capitalist countries and the movement for national liberation.

Zionist counterrevolution began by making inroads in the European working class movement. In the early years, when the growth of monopoly capitalism and the expansion of reactionary tendencies that accompanied the establishment of the imperialist phase of capitalism demanded the unity and solidarity of the proletariat, the Zionists focused on dividing the working class.

They propagated the thesis that all non-Jews were, and would always be, anti-Semites; asserted that the only possi- bility for the Jewish masses’ well-being and justice was to emigrate to the “promised land”; and defended class collaboration, thus diverting the Jewish proletariat away from the struggle for their real emancipation and dividing and weak- ening the working class movement. It’s not fortuitous that in czarist police archives one finds documents calling for sup- port for the Zionist movement as a way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution.

Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote at the time in his diary:“All our youth; all those who are from 20 to 30 years old, will abandon their obscure socialist tendencies and come over to me.”

However, the efforts of Zionist counterrevolution could not hold back the wheels of history.The victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia ushered in a period of transition from capitalism to socialism on a world scale. The first victory of the proletariat, the premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.

Most of the money that filled Zionist coffers came from Russia, where czarism had humiliated and oppressed the Jews for centuries. Russia provided a million immigrants for the Zionist colonization of Palestine. When the Russian Revolution liquidated the exploitation of man by man, it also destroyed the basis for Zionism in the Soviet Union.

Leninist policy on the national question toppled all Zionist myths that the Jews could not be fully incorporated, with equal rights, into society and destroyed all the racist claims on the inevitability of anti-Semitism. The Zionists never did, and never will, forgive the Soviet state and its Leninist Party, not so much for cutting off the money flow from Russia and for the loss of workers for the colonization effort, but because the Bolsheviks implemented a correct policy that incorporated the talents and efforts of the Soviet Jews into the tasks of building a new society and thus demonstrated the class origins of discrimination and anti-Semitism, breaking with the past and providing a genuine solution to the Jewish problem, a solution which was not and could never be a massive exodus to Palestine.

Zionist counterrevolution took on an anti-Soviet thrust. Before October 1917 the Zionists collaborated with Kerensky. Later they supported all the attempts at counter- revolution and enthusiastically participated in the different white “governments” set up in different parts of the country during the Civil War [in Russia]. They were active in all the moves against the Soviet Union from abroad, and their powerful propaganda machine spread a spate of lies about the first workers’ and peasants’ state in the world.

Not even the Soviet victory over German fascism, which saved so many Jewish lives, made the Zionists change their anti-Soviet stand.

With the outbreak of the cold war the Zionists collaborated in all the subversive and diversionary activities against the USSR and other socialist countries. The secret services of the Zionist state of Israel coordinated their spy activities with the CIA. Zionist agents played an active role in the counter-revolutionary attempts in Hungary and Czechoslovakia.

Today Zionism seconds the hypocritical anti-Soviet campaign on presumed violations of the human rights of Jews in the Soviet Union and does all it can to put pressure on Soviet citizens of Jewish origin so they will leave their true homeland and go to Israel.This effort by Zionist counterrevolution can only lead to new failures. And to complete the picture there is the Zionist counterrevolutionary action against the national liberation movements.

Soon after World War I, Zionist settlers penetrated into Palestinian territory, acting as the spearhead of British imperialist interests in opposition to the Arab peoples’ hopes for independence. Their role was clearly spelled out by the prominent Zionist leader Max Nordau in a statement to the British authorities:

“We know what you want from us: that we defend the Suez Canal.We must defend your route to India which pass- es through the Middle East.We are ready to take on that difficult task. But you must allow us to become powerful enough to carry out that task.”

And, as a matter of fact, the Zionists became a power and succeeded in establishing their own state in 1948: the Zionist state of Israel. Now their task is to defend oil routes, protect all the interests of U.S. imperialism and block the advance of the Arab revolution.

Backed by tremendous amounts of imperialist economic and military aid, the Zionists are constantly acting against national liberation movements.

At one time it was their mission to penetrate African and Asian independence movements, guarantee that the newly independent states followed paths acceptable to imperialism, that they not stray from the confines of neocolonialism. Israel offered courses, advisers, all sorts of aid.

But the ploy wasn’t very successful. Israel’s increasing role as imperialism’s policeman in the Middle East, its racism and avowed expansionism made the young African and Asian nations see the dangers of Israeli“aid,”the treachery of Israeli foreign policy.

Nevertheless, the Zionist state took up a new role in the struggle of world reaction against progress. It went beyond the geographical confines of the Middle East, estab- lished friendly ties with all reactionary regimes and began to supply arms,equipment and advisers to those who were trying to suppress national liberation struggles.

The Israeli armaments industry specialized in designing and producing all sorts of weapons for urban and rural anti-guerrilla warfare.

The South African racist regime, the dictatorships of Guatemala and El Salvador, and the fascist Pinochet are among the best clients of the Israeli armaments industry. Israeli arms sales in 1978 were estimated at $400 million. One of their best clients was the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.

Zionist counterrevolution was present in Somoza’s Nicaragua in the form of Galil guns and Pull-push planes, but they couldn’t stop the victory of the Sandinista revolutionaries.

This is a symbol of our times: neither the machinations of Zionist counterrevolution, nor Israeli arms, can hold back the victorious march of the peoples of the world.

(END OF THE GRANMA ARTICLE)

Whatever one thinks of Fidel Castro or of former Soviet leader Josef Stalin, the fact is that there has long been a very real split between the Trotskyites—who have (in the leadership level of the “neo-conservative” network in the United States) evolved into the tribunes of the global Zionist movement—and the nationalistically-oriented elements led in Russia by Stalin following his consolidation of power.

To understand these nuances and to recognize the part they have played in shaping the events of the last half of the 20th century it is vital to understand how and why The Enemy Within has been able to manipulate the traditional cause of“anti-communism”and bend it into a mechanism for the Zionist cause.

Where there are a few insignificant Trotskyite movements—rag-tag bands of street agitators and others—who continue to operate quite independently of (and often in opposition to) the neo-conservative Zionists, it is those “neo-conservatives” who have wrapped themselves in the American flag who are the real Enemy Within.

And in light of all this, it’s no coincidence that in Russia today, both traditional Communists (many of whom revere the memory of Josef Stalin) and anti-Communists are united in their opposition to Zionism and Jewish plutocratic power.

In the chapter which follows, we will examine some remarkable historical facts which underscore the reality of the split between the Stalinists and the Zionist Trotskyites, and will further clarify the nature of the modern-day Enemy Within.

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones CIA Mossad

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
 

Anyone who has taken on the frustrating task of trying to free the mind of an Alex Jones Infowars cult follower knows the typical resistive responses: “he tells a lot of truth”, “he is too well known to be killed”, “you are just cointelpro trying to divide the truth movement”, and the most hilarious one, “he doesn’t know any better”…I could go on and on with the list of excuses these poor brainwashed souls come up with.

It’s ironic that the mindset of members of the Church of Infowars is exactly the same as those who blindly follow the Jewish-controlled mainstream media. Church members have the audacity to project their own delusions onto the sheep of the mainstream flock. Knowing this should make it easier when selecting a strategy to use to awaken the Infowars sheep. In addition to addressing the underlying psychological condition that makes people susceptible to brainwashing, looking back in history and presenting a mountain of evidence against the subject in question should put a crack in the hardened toxic sludge that prevents truth from seeping into the brains of these sheep.

 

What we already know about Alex Jones

The evidence tells us that Alex Jones is a highly skilled counter-intelligence operative on the payroll of the state of Israel, via Stratfor and Mossad’s subordinate, the Central Intelligence Agency (Operation Mockingbird). He uses shock-and-awe expositions through his controlled-opposition media empire, with the goal of instilling fear in his listeners and hypnotizing them into a passive, lethargic trance. Jones has even admitted to having familial connections to the CIA. (Click the links, highlighted in red, for in-depth explanations.)

“Whenever I go to a family reunion, half the people in the room are former CIA.” —Alex Jones (The Opie and Anthony Show – 04-17-2013)

Incidentally, Jones gained a lot of his popularity early in his career by “predicting” the 9/11 attacks, of which, he later admitted he had “intel” on. What’s more, many of Jones’ guests on Infowars radio are either former or current intelligence and law enforcement officials. With all this chumming around with intelligence operatives, is it any wonder that he hired a CIA/Stratfor-connected editor in chief?

Another likelihood that has not yet been addressed by the alternative media is that Jones’ media empire functions to sequester opponents of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy (New World Order) and to streamline them into an identifiable and thus more manageable group. Jones and his followers often refer to themselves as “infowarriors”. This has various uses for the Elders of Zion, as we shall see.

 

perrynatreviewcoverThe CIA establishes the National Review to homogenize conservative schools

Shortly after the CIA was established in 1947, at the height of the Cold War and during US Congress’ attempted purge of Communists in America, CIA agent William F. Buckley Jr. and Trotskyite James Burnham founded the National Review magazine, which would go on to be the editorial mouthpiece of “conservatives” in America. Economist and historian Murray Rothbard writes,

“Not long after the Central Intelligence agency was founded in 1947, the American public and the world were subjected to an unprecedented level of propaganda in the service of the US foreign policy objectives in the Cold War…. At its peak, the CIA allocated 29 percent of hits budget to ‘media and propaganda’.”[I]

What’s more, historian Murray Friedman claims in The Neoconseravative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (2006) that National Review, despite its Catholic appearance, was run by Jews, specifically Frank Meyer, Frank Chodorov, Morrie Raskin, Marvin Liebman, and Willi Schlamm. Neoconservatism was and is a Jewish movement. It serves the same purpose as National Review. Historian E. Michael Jones writes,

National Review existed to destroy competing conservatisms, especially those incompatible with the international foreign policy establishment. National Review used conservatism to mobilize, certain ethnic groups, e.g., Catholics, behind government policies. It existed to colonize certain groups, to divide and conquer, and then get them to act against their own interests. NR was created to destroy isolationist conservatism. Conservatives who criticized America’s march to empire were demonized and decertified. National Review has shown undeviating consistency in this regard, the most recent example being David Frum’s diatribe against the paleoconservatives.”[II]

What E. Michael Jones describes here seems like an exact description of Alex Jones and Infowars, with NR’s streamlining of conservatism applicable also to the streamlining of conspiracists, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, resisters of the New World Order, etc. It’s important to note that National Review was founded for the purpose of serving the interests of both the CIA and Jews. This is also likely the case for Alex Jones and Infowars, as he has diffused any active resistance to the world government takeover and protected international Jews from any blame. As Jewish communist Vladimir Lenin admitted, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”

 “Much of what is attributed to William F. Buckley was the work of Jewish thinkers and financiers who…. Buckley was the goyishe front man for Trotskyite conservatism in the same way Gus Hall was the goyishe front man for American Communism…. Buckley was the ideological enforcer who would pronounce the political cherem on competing conservative sects and expel them from the synagogue. He was also the model for the Catholics he was to control by transforming them from recalcitrant ethnics into docile movement conservatives..His (Buckley) other job was to destroy any conservative movement not toeing the line of the internationalist establishment. All forms of ‘isolationism’ were anathema. It also meant and all out attack on anything ‘anti-Semitic'”[III]

As you can see, Alex Jones is the Zionist carbon copy of William F. Buckley. Jones is quick to call out anti-Semitism on his show and makes daily references to Hitler and the alleged Holocaust of six million Jews.

Infowars’ homogenizing effect

The conspirators gain several advantages by sequestering and homogenizing their opponents. First, opponents are told to think inside the box—the conspirator’s predesigned box, with “unity” being the catalyst for conformity. The group is also given an identity, from which, if anyone deviates, that individual will be ostracized from the group. This is especially useful for the conspirators if that individual clues in to what’s going on and tries to alert the group. The group then purges itself of the very individuals who pose a legitimate threat to the conspirators. In this way, the group is now helping the conspirators whilst believing they are working against them. Spend enough time around a Infowarrior and you soon see how any dissent within the group is quickly demonized and marginalized, the very same way it is with those who blindly follow the mainstream media. And Like National Review, Alex Jones provides gentile window dressing for what is actually a Jewish movement: his anarcho-libertarianism based in the Masonic US Constitution.

 

Operation Mockingbird/Cointelpro

counterintelligence1Operation Mockingbird came out in the 1950s shortly after the CIA was founded. It’s purpose was to influence the media. Both National Review and Encounter were likely creations of Project Mockingbird. Mockingbird was started by the Jewish Cord Meyer and Illuminati stooge Allen W. Dulles. Then-CIA director William Colby testified to the Church Committee, a United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, that there were over 400 CIA agents spreading disinformation through the media as a part of Mockingbird. If the purpose of National Review, according to E. Michael Jones, bears any resemblance to the objectives of Operation Mockingbird, then this CIA program is also a movement that advances Jewish interests. So, if Alex Jones is a much later and more sophisticated Operation Mockingbird creation, it would make sense why he deflects any Jewish blame for the evils going on in the world, has a host of Jewish sponsors and backers, and prevents opposition to the world conspiracy from gaining any legitimate momentum. It also corroborates those who say that Jones is an agent provocateur spreading disinformation and disrupting public protests, like the Austin gun rally in 2010. Jones completely fit the description of a CIA agent provocateur/agitator/cointelpro at this particular event, then pulled a psyop by claiming those offended by this act of treachery were the actual provocateurs. There are many more examples, but this one stands out. The stunt proved to be a failure for Jones and his handlers. Whether Jones was sent there to disrupt and cause trouble or whether Jones arrogantly believed he could rally and centralize the dissenters not already in the Church of Infowars (homogenizing effect), it’s difficult to tell for sure. You may have heard of psychiatrists saying non-conformists are mentally ill; well, on several occasions Jones has said the very same thing of those who accuse him of being a plant. This isn’t the behaviour of an objective journalist but of a cult leader or counter-intelligence operative.

Cointelpro, an acronym for “counter-intelligence program”, is an FBI program designed to achieve very much the same thing as Operation Mockingbird. Since the United States’ intelligence organizations work in tandem, it’s likely that the two programs blend with one another and fall under the umbrella of the mother intelligence lodge in Tel Aviv, Israel, specifically the Israeli Mossad’s psychological warfare division Lohamah Pscichlogit (LAP). Jones is likely also involved with Cointelpro. While he does talk about these intelligence programs in his documentary films and on his radio program, it’s difficult to see these supposed revelations as anything more than providing a convenient alibi for Jones. And it certainly achieves this. I don’t know how many times I have heard his cult members say something like, “but he talks about Mossad and Cointelpro”; therefore, we are expected to believe he couldn’t possibly be involved in them. Right… keep drinking the Kool-Aid.

 

[I] E. Michael Jones, “Manipulating Catholic Support for the War: The Black Operation Known as Conservatism,” in Neo-conned Again: Hypocrisy, Lawlessness, and the Rape of Iraq (Vienna, VA: I H S Press, 2005), p. 175.

[II] E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 864.

[III] Ibid, p. 866