Hungary’s ‘nationalist’ PM Viktor Orbán nothing but a commie plant

A fire worker controls the temporary pedestal, as activists and sympathizers of Hungarian ‘Szolidaritas’ Movement pull their ropes to break down their plastic statue of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, representing the former Soviet communist dictator Stalin, in Budapest on September 29, 2013 during their anti-government demonstration to protest against the financial and economic policy of Orban’s government. (ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 24, 2019 Anno Domini

The Soviet Trust model of using controlled opposition to trap anti-communists and conservatives is still in use today.

Look no further than Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who has successfully fooled Western (and Eastern) conservatives into believing that he and a clique of so called Eastern nationalists, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, are genuine conservatives trying to save the world from the globalists and the evil West. It seems Orban’s anti-immigration policy has been the main driver in affirming this carefully crafted ruse.

Unfortunately, Orban and other East Bloc nations’ anti-immigration policies are not about saving Europe and conservatives but about preserving stability within the Soviet Bloc nations as they reform and about pushing more migrants to Western Europe, which is the primary target of the Soviet Kalergi plan of migration destabilization. When Hungary was officially communist, under János Kádár, immigration was greatly restricted, so Orban’s policy on immigration is essentially the same as it was in Red Hungary.

No one seems to be asking how these Soviet Bloc nations with membership in the European Union are able to maintain membership whilst going against E.U. directives like unfettered immigration. The answer can only be that the Kremlin has cut a deal to keep its satellites free of the migration agenda, thus empowering the satellites while its Western European neighbours disintegrate. That or the European Union has become the victim of nuclear blackmail and has no choice but to let the Kremlin and its satellites do what they like. Of course, the E.U. is full of communist saboteurs, so whatever scenario, it’s not hard to believe.

Soviet analyst Max Moritz writes,

“Orbán’s attacks against Brussels, against George Soros, and certainly against immigration are more than just bombastic spectacle. Hungary, which formed in February 1991 together with Poland and then-Czechoslovakia, the so-called Visegrád Group, is seamlessly pursuing, like its meanwhile three good old socialist brother states (that include Slovakia), an unchanged East Bloc policy, which in the new situation is designed to make sure that these countries only benefit from their membership in the European Union.

Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban and Polish ruling party leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski, are depicted as secret communists during anti-government parade that walked through the streets of Krakow, Poland on 14 April, 2019. (Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

“Their (Hungary, Poland, etc.) behaviour during the 2015 so-called “refugee crisis” gave these four countries completely away, as they outright refused (and still refuse) to take any significant numbers of people in. In other words, they do not regard themselves as part of the E.U. or the West at all! Given the fact that this immense wave of migration (that hasn’t stopped even now) represents a clandestine Russian operation aimed at destabilising Western Europe, and Western Europe only, it becomes clear that these unchanged East-bloc countries, based on their fictitious nationalism, won’t allow these people from Africa and Asia in. After all, the migration crisis is designed to hit solely the West! And: They are, under whatever pretext, silently or not so silently leaving the EU, not formally, but factually, moving back into the same East-European communist sphere they came from!,” says Moritz.

Orban is accused of being a communist informant during the 1980s when Hungary was openly communist. It seems the Kremlin set him up in a Soviet Trust model from the beginning—bringing him to fame as a (fake) anti-Communist, which resulted in ensnaring legitimate anti-communists and conservatives and, thereby, controlling legitimate anti-communistm in the country, thus allowing the continuance of the rebranded communist regime.

“…since coming into office in Hungary’s 2010 general elections, he (Orban) has faced frequent accusations both at home and abroad of emulating the authoritarian practices he once opposed.” (Source)

Orban’s role as a fake anti-communist also appears to have helped facilitate the grand deception of the global collapse of communism in the 1990s, with Hungary being part of a carefully laid out plan to conveniently allow the world’s media to have cameras ready to roll as one regime appeared to fall after another, in successive order. Now he is the Prime Minister of the country, whose anxious populace view him as a stooge of Putin and the Kremlin. This is unsurprising, as Orban is surrounded by “former” communist advisors. Some of Orban’s critics see him as using the exact same playbook used by Kádár. Critics also accuse Poland’s Jarosław Kaczyński (pictured above as a crypto-Communist alongside Orban) of using the playbook from Communist Poland, which is similar to Kádár’s. They are similar because they come from the same source, the COMINTERN at the Kremlin.

MOSCOW, RUSSIA – JANUARY 31: Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) receives Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (C) in the Kremlin on January 31, 2013 in Moscow, Russia. Orban is on a one-day visit to Russia. (Photo by Sasha Mordovets/Getty Images)

When it became public in 2015 that Orban was part of the Soviet Trust honeypot, he was called to appear before a parliamentary national security committee—to which he refused, calling it “absurd and ridiculous”.

Orban and Hungary are not the only ones running this fake opposition Soviet Trust. The same could be said for Poland and other “former” Soviet bloc nations also blocking E.U. immigration directives. So, while these Soviet Bloc nations continue to fool Western conservatives and anti-communists alike that Russia and its satellites have reformed to capitalism and conservative values, Western Europe and America continue to cripple under the weight of Soviet destabilization measures like the Kalergi plan and cultural Marxism. Meanwhile, said Soviet Bloc nations continue to draw on European Union coffers. What a swindle!

 

Why the Jewish press and neo-Nazis ignore Hitler’s sexuality


By Timothy Fitzpatrick

May 16, 2015 Anno Domini

The Jewish-controlled media and neo-Nazis alike have kept a tight lid on Hitler’s sexuality.  If the overwhelming evidence that Hitler was a homosexual were ever made known to the general public, the result could have disastrous effects for both sides.

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Hitler and leading Nazis like deputy Führer Rudolf Hess were homosexuals, despite the perception that National Socialism in Germany was the solution to the plague of decadence in the Weimar Republic and that the Nazis were vicious persecutors of homosexuals. I am sure the white nationalists that frequent this blog are going to bitterly attack me for this piece. Their typical excuse is that rumours of Hitler’s alleged homosexuality are all from Jewish sources trying to demonize the poor Nazis. I will show how this argument is absolutely impossible in light of the greater agenda of the Jewish Kahal.

Jewish motive for covering up Hitler’s homosexuality

Pioneer of cultural marxism Theodor Adorno, author of The Authoritarian Personality, in the employment of the American Jewish Committee.

Pioneer of cultural Marxism Theodor Adorno, author of The Authoritarian Personality, in the employment of the American Jewish Committee.

The motive for the Jewish community to coverup Hitler’s homosexuality is deeply rooted in the cultural warfare waged by elite Jews against Western Civilization through the Frankfurt School and the Jewish-dominated intellectual movements in America during the early 20th century through to present time. Jews have argued, especially through the American Jewish Committee and its magnum opus propaganda piece The Authoritarian Personality (Adorno), that sexual repression inevitably leads to authoritarianism (a euphemism for the Catholic Church), repressive regimes, and, ultimately, Holocausts. In other words, Hitler and the Nazis rose to power as a result of reversing the decadent slide of the Weimar Republic and repressing everyone’s libidos. Therefore, sexual liberation is the only solution to world peace (and more specifically, the safety of Jews). Can you see the contradiction yet? If Hitler and leading Nazis were closeted, yet active homosexuals, how would that theory stand? If Adorno and the AJC were correct, the sexually liberated Hitler and the Nazis should have brought the most peaceful regime known to man, not the opposite. Obviously, then, public knowledge of Hitler’s apparent homosexuality would have imploded the authoritarian theory, upon which much of the Frankfurt school’s propaganda rests.

White nationalists are correct that Jews demonize Hitler at every opportunity. So, why don’t they do it in this case? Discussion of Hitler’s sexuality is not allowed in the media or academia. It is almost as taboo as Holocaust revisionism.

A more proximate motive for Jews covering up Hitler’s homosexuality is the deliberate and systematic escalation in the homosexualization of Christian society. How would the squeaky-clean, peaceful, loving, and caring image of homosexuals portrayed by the media look if everyone knew that homosexuals were capable of becoming Hitlers? Worse yet, how would it look if homosexuality contributed to the rise of mad men? Jews have spent far too long creating and polishing the homosexual lobby to mess it up by letting an inconvenient truth like Hitler’s homosexuality get in the way. In makes absolutely no sense for them to do this. There are hundreds of other ways to demonize Hitler, warranted or unwarranted. The homosexual agenda is the top priority right now. Hitler and the Holocaust dogma have been demoted, for the time being.

Neo-Nazi motive for covering up Hitler’s homosexuality200px-Cover_of_The_Pink_Swastika
Neo-Nazis are typically socially conservative, at least in official policy, so it’s understandable why neo-Nazis would reject any notion that their leader were a closeted queer. National Socialism captivated Germany at a time when sexual excess rivaled Sodom and Gomorrah. Today, neo-Nazis view National Socialism as the quintessential bulwark against liberalism, multiculturalism, and especially homosexuality and its Jewish-controlled LGBTQ movement. To admit that you had been deceived by a homosexual conman is just too much for neo-Nazis. It would bring down their small world. And what identity would they adopt without Nazism? Can’t join the Catholic Church, after all, it’s a Jewish creation, according to many neo-Nazis. So, denial becomes the party response.

Like the Holocaust dogma of Judaism, we can’t get a healthy public debate going to determine the truth of the matter. If Hitler and his leading Nazis were not homosexuals, truth should not fear investigation and we should be allowed to investigate it, with the full participation of the media and academia. As long as Jews control the press, academia, and intellectual movements, and neo-Nazis remain the de facto controlled opposition to Jews, we may never uncover the truth about Hitler’s sexuality.

(The documentary at the top of this article is The Hidden Führer: Debating the Enigma of Hitler’s Sexuality.)

Goy Guide to World History IV-V

*Part 3 not available yet

The Jewish semen fetish examined

keri (happystance -seminal emission)
By Timothy Fitzpatrick
The pornography industry has made the dehumanized act of the “cum shot”, or the “money shot” a commonplace in the bedrooms of post-modern persons, but it didn’t evolve on its own or out of mere human sexual curiosity.

Instead, human sexuality has been manipulated and coerced, resulting in depraved acts being foisted on the unsuspecting men and women who consume pornography and use sex services like prostitution.

Without question, the sex industry—be it pornography, prostitution, or sex slavery—is overrepresented by Jews. In fact, Jews openly admit it. For example, Nathan Abrams writes in the Jewish Quarterly,“Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to [Luke] Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”[1]
Vulgar Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein said in an interview with Luke Ford,

The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.[2]

Of course, the Jewish-dominated Frankfurt School laid the foundation for the moral subversion of Western Civilization, starting in the early 20th century, inspired by Illuminatus Marquis de Sade, from whom we get the concept of sadism.

Pornography thus serves the Jews and their masonic cohorts as a vehicle for subverting the delicate relationships between men and women, the backbone of the nuclear family, and filling their minds, and ultimately their sexual relations, with anarchistic and secular humanistic sexual acts that go contrary to the Logos, Jesus Christ.

The “Money Shot”

Continuing in the tradition of Jewish subversion of Christian mores—the Logos, Jewish fetishism has been externalized onto gentiles, making it a popular act that gentiles mistakenly believe they enjoy. The pornography industry refers to a man ejaculating into the mouth or on the face of the woman with whom he has just fornicated with as the “money shot” (supposedly because this scene cost the most to produce), the “cum shot”, or a “facial”. A typical hardcore pornographic scene culminates in this depravity, as if it were the ultimate goal and greatest experience of sexual intercourse one could have. Young men who consume porn mimic this act with their girlfriends, wives, and Saturday night dance-club hookups. The women, in turn, believe men enjoy it, and so attempt to reciprocate the feeling. The “money shot” is just the beginning in a long-line of similar depraved acts, including bukkake, a pornographically inspired sex act where several man stand around a man or woman and ejaculate on them as they kneel or lay. In one of the first instances of public promotion of what became the “money shot”, Illuminatus Marquis de Sade in his 1785 work 120 Days of Sodom wrote,

I show them my prick, then what do you suppose I do? I squirt the fuck in their face… That’s my passion, my child, I have no other… and you’re about to behold it.

Jewish pornographer Bill Margold explains the satisfaction men supposedly derive from the “cum shot” while viewing pornography,

I’d like to really show what I believe the men want to see: violence against women. I firmly believe that we serve a purpose by showing that. The most violent we can get is the cum shot in the face. Men get off behind that because they get even with the women they can’t have.[3]

Margold gives us a glimpse of a seemingly Jewish fixation on semen with his review of a couple of adult films from the late 1970s, early 1980s.

What is supposed to be a cast party degenerates into an orgasmic-less series of grunting and grinding grapples during which many of the holes and poles spend more time looking into the camera than in each other. Cum shots are the main course, and Benny never misses the chance to show us a man’s seed from every angle possible. If I were a spermatozoon in Champagne Orgy, I’d file for residuals.[4]

Actress Cameron Diaz in There's Something About Mary with her semen-styled hair.

Actress Cameron Diaz in There’s Something About Mary with her semen-styled hair.

Toilet humour, semen humour

Critics have sometimes equated Jewish humour with “toilet humour”, and it can be found in no better example than in Jewish Hollywood. Jewish writer Uriel Heilman writes, in The Past, and Future, of Jewish Humor,

“For a Jew, a bowel movement is an event. That’s why there’s so much bathroom humor.

Blogger The End of Zion makes a good case for this Jewish toilet humour in The Fecal Fixation of the Chosen Ones. The Jewish “holy” book the Babylonian Talmud makes numerous references to excrement and urine, imposing all kinds of absurd rabbinical rituals and rules surrounding such bodily discharges. The Talmud is also rife with seminal rituals and laws. So, it’s no surprise that intimate bodily fluids of semen, along with its accompanying act of sexual union between a husband and wife, are downplayed in the form of cheap humour, so as to dehumanize and demoralize the audience. In the 1998 film There’s Something About Mary, Jewish actor Ben Stiller is depicted masturbating prior to a big date with a past crush, Mary, played by Cameron Diaz. Stiller finishes, puzzled as to where his ejaculate went, as Mary arrives at his hotel-room door. He zips up his pants and answers, at which point Mary discovers what she thinks is hair gel drooping from his ear lobe, which is actually Stiller’s missing ejaculate. Mary then uses the semen to style her own hair. In the movie series Scary Movie, young men are depicted ejaculating and plastering their girlfriends to walls and ceilings during sexual and oral intercourse. The raunchy and ridiculous 2010 film Hot Tub Time Machine combines the subversive elements of homosexuality and the “cum shot” when a man is forced to perform fellatio on a friend after losing a football bet in a bar. The act never actually takes place, but the friend who is to receive the act is shown waking up on the men’s room floor while his friend is standing over him with what looks to be semen on his face. After a couple of jokes, the friend eventually admits he just put soap on his face as a joke and that no fellatio took place. There are many Hollywood movies showing a clear fixation on semen and male ejaculation, disguised in the mask of humour and fun.

From where do Jews derive this fixation?

It’s difficult to pinpoint exactly from where Jews get their semen fetish, but like their fecal fixation, rabbinic laws and rituals seem to form the bulk of it. The Jewish Kabbalah, a book of black and white magic, semen is said to harness a divine life force.

In Judaism Discovered (2008), Michael Hoffman writes,

Like all Babylonian religions, Judaism practices magica sexualis (sex magic). These practices are found in the India of the Hindus and he Egypt of the Pharaohs: ‘Statues and bas-releifs depict the self-begotten Supreme Being (Amun-Ra) clutching a prodigious phallus erectus and receiving the homage of the Pharaohs, whom he embraces and influses with the vital fluid (ka).’ (Allan Edwards, Erotica Judaic, [New York, 1967], p. 11) Much is made in Orthodox Judaism of the fluid or “influx” whith the Zaddik distributes: ‘…the earlthy Zaddik was conceived…as being the locus that both receives the influx and distributes it…. According to other statements in the circle of Rabbi Elimelekh, ‘ The Zaddik is like a channel, which draws liquids downward.’” What then is this all-important holy liquid “influx” that the Judaic holy man is divinely charged with distributing? For the answer, we turn to the standard three-volume English reference work, The Wisdom of the Zohar by the Hungarian Khazar, Sandor Schwartz (alias ‘Isaiah Tishby’), of Hebrew University, Jerusalem, who cites: ‘The actual physiological  process of the flow of semen from its higher source in the brain, according to traditional medieval (rabbinic) theory….’ This is akin to the belief of the Hindus, that the semen of the holy man rises up his spine through the power of Kundalini [serpent power] and is then wrapped around his brain…. ‘These practices achieve their greatest efficacy…only when performed by the ideal righteous…enhanced to the degree that it transforms the Zaddik into a cosmic magician…central to the nature of the Hasidic righteous man is, therefore…his capacity to bring down and distribute divine power, or influx…and also in many instances, to perform miracles.’

The sex magic central to this power is enhanced by the use of ‘oral techniques—incantations of divine names…which could be misinterpreted by larger circles…The emphasis on the mouth is symptomatic of the bodily nature of the attraction of the divine influx in Hasidism….’

A me’onen is ‘someone who passes seven kinds of semen from seven different animals over his eyes for magical purposes. (BT Sanhedrin 65b [Steinsaltz]) [5]

The supposed belief of Renaissance and 18th century Jewish magicians and occultists, like the Marquis de Sade, was that by engaging in and fostering debauchery, nature would reveal her secrets so that the magician could then use this secret knowledge to manipulate matter and dominate others. Author E. Michael Jones discusses this in depth in his masterful work Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control.

The most disgusting and blasphemous example of Jewish semen fetishism is a reference in the Talmud to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ under the pseudonym Balaam.

…Jesus shares his place in the Netherworld (hell) with Titus and Balaam, the notorious arch enemies of the Jewish people. Whereas Titus is punished for the destruction of the Temple by being burned to ashes, reassembled, and burned over and over again, and whereas Balaam  is castigated by sitting in hot semen, Jesus’ fate consists of sitting forever in boiling excrement.
—Peter Schäfer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton University Press), p. 13. BT Gittin 57a., Babylonian Talmud, Soncino Edition, 1935.

Depiction of Kabbalist demon queen Lilith

Depiction of Kabbalist demon queen Lilith

Semen demons

According to the Jewish Kabbalah, a demon queen named Lilith takes on the form of the succubus and visits men in their sleep and causes them to have nocturnal emissions, taking away their “life force.” Lilith is said to steal the semen and use it to populate the demon world with strange hybrid offspring. The Zohar states that each emission of semen contains up to a million souls.

Alchemical sperm

Alchemical sperm

This belief has its roots in a rabbinic tradition that believes demons (sheidim, creatures more akin to the Islam djinn than earth-trembling spirits) are unable to procreate without human “seed.” Thus Judaism has a robust tradition of succubae, seductive female demons who are the cause of male erotic dreams and nocturnal emissions. Adam was the first progenitor of demons.[6]

Ingesting semen

Equally common in hardcore pornography today, and correspondingly in the bedrooms of modern men and women, is the act of ingesting semen. As repulsive as it is, pornography has normalized this concept and made men and women believe that it is enjoyable and fun. Some pornographic scenes go to the extreme of degrading the women by having them drink semen cocktails composed from multiple men. Then there is the abhorrent practice known as “snowballing”, where women pass around semen to each other mouth to mouth. Again, we find these practices in ancient Jewish magic and the occult world.

Donald Tyson writes in his 2000 book Sexual Alchemy: Magic Intercourse with Spirits,

Sexual alchemy is a system of ritual magic that allows its practitioners to initiate and sustain satisfying erotic relationships with loving spirits who are the active agents of the Goddess.

In Judaism, the Shekinah is considered the female goddess. Tyson continues,

Lovemaking with these spirits releases large amounts of occult energy into the body that concentrates itself in the three fluids most closely associated with the pleasures of sex and the generation of new life—the clear lubricating fluids released from both the male and the female genitals during arousal, the red menstrual blood of women, and the white semen of men. By collecting these transmuted secretions, preparing them properly, and regularly ingesting them in minute amounts, catalytic changes can be brought about in the mind and body that intensify and prolong sensual pleasure, enhance physical and psychic abilities, and elevate the level of consciousness. (p. 18, 22)

I doubt very much that Johnny BarStar is aware that he is performing a dehumanized occult act when he ejaculates in the mouth of the floozie he met at the nightclub hours prior to, or that Jane Floozie is aware that the semen she just ingested will give her life force and magical powers, according to occult legend. The world is subconsciously being initiated into a Kabbalist sex cult through the consumption of contemporary pornography and the sex practices externalized onto it through the mass media and in the brothels and sex rings.


[1] Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

[2] Ibid

[3] Gail Dines, Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality, 2010, Beacon Press. p. xxiv.

[5] Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, 2008, p. 237-239, 378

Kinsey: The Crypto-Psychoanalyst

Providing the Gentile Veneer for the Jewish-led Sexual Revolution – Part 2

By Timothy Fitzpatrick 

There is perhaps no greater critic today of the late sexual revolutionary Alfred C. Kinsey than Jewish-American Judith Reisman, author and former investigator with the U.S. Department of Justice, who has “chased” Kinsey and his controversial sex researchers for more than 35 years.

Reisman, who plausibly asserts that Kinsey was a saboteur of the “Greatest Generation” onwards in the United States of America, claims that Kinsey was a co-conspirator in league with a Nazi-linked Rockefeller Foundation, based on her years of study of The Kinsey Sex Research Institute. Reisman stretches this and implies that Kinsey and the Sexual Revolution were part of a Nazi conspiracy against the West (she never explains the purpose of this conspiracy other than to say it benefits Big Pharma and Big Sexology). But the greater weight of evidence shows that Kinsey was more Jewish-linked than anything— particularly with the Jewish-dominated psychoanalytic movement—and that Reisman is engaging in deception or self-deception in reaching her conclusions—a trait common among strong self-identifying Jews.[1]

Reisman’s case for Kinsey and the sexual revolution being Nazi/fascist subversion of America

Reisman bases her claim that Kinsey was a stealth Nazi largely on the Kinsey Institute’s funding by the Rockefeller Foundation, which had financed parts of the Nazi regime during the Second World War.

But elites like the Rockefellers financing opposing factions is hardly out of the ordinary. What’s more, Jewish financiers, like Brown Brothers Harriman and the Warburg bank, also financed the Nazi war machine. High Jewish finance does not discriminate, especially when its loans give it the ability to manipulate both sides in a dispute or, in Nazi Germany’s case, the war.

“Was Kinsey, like his Rockefeller patrons, unsure which side would win? Could he have thought that, if Hitler won, his ‘work’ would receive continued support, greater funds, and more opportunity? After all, psychopathic scientists, such as Kinsey, did well—unhindered—under Hitler. Additional information about Kinsey’s links to fascists and Hitler’s henchmen suggest much is hidden.”[2] Reisman speculates that the Kinsey Institute must have hidden files locked away that demonstrate Kinsey’s Nazi associations.

But radical leftists were booted from and/or persecuted in Nazi Germany. What makes Reisman think Hitler wouldn’t have tossed Kinsey out of Germany had he been there? Even Sigmund Freud, perhaps the true father of the sexual revolution, and his psychoanalysts didn’t survive the Nazi purges in Germany.

Reisman points to Kinsey’s collaboration with Nazi pedophile Dr. Fritz von Balluseck as more evidence of Kinsey’s crypto-Nazism.

“Indeed, Kinsey and his fellow WWII draft-dodging team feared public exposure for aiding and abetting a WWII Gestapo agent in his ongoing, even murderous sexual violence against children.”[3]

A poster advertising a presentation by Judith Reisman depicts Kinsey and the Nazis.

She also points out his collaboration with serial child rapist Rex King but does not mention King’s Jewish ethnicity.[4] (At some point, King was given the gentile pseudonym of Mr. Green.) Reisman accuses Kinsey of being anti-Semitic, despite his collaboration with King and despite Kinsey’s friendship with his highly connected Jewish lawyer Morris L. Ernst and Jewish sexologist Harry Benjamin. Despite the Ernst-Benjamin-Kinsey connection, Reisman claims that Kinsey refused to employ Jews. Kinsey also received support from New York Times owner Arthur Hays Sulzberger, a practicing Jew who not only gave Kinsey’s books prominent coverage in the press, he also helped secure financing for Kinsey as a board member on the Rockefeller Foundation. Reisman makes no mention of this seemingly strange association. And without a friendly Jewish press to promote Kinsey’s falsified research, it’s questionable that his books would have sold like they did.

Reisman’s claims about Kinsey, the Nazis, and homosexuality are echoed in the The Pink Swastika (Lively, Abrams 1995), which attempts to further demonize all Jew haters, particularly Nazis, as closet homosexuals. While it may be true that Hitler and the Nazis engaged in homosexual behaviour, it is irrelevant in the bigger picture. The book is a sort of neoconservative treatise targeted at “Judeo-Christians,” an oxymoronic term Reisman also frequently uses in Sexual Sabotage (2010). (Reisman references Nazis no less than 47 times in this book). Joseph M. Schimmel and Christian J. Pinto’s 2007 film The Kinsey Syndrome, in which Reisman participated, carries on the theme of Kinsey representing a Nazi-led sexual conspiracy against the West.

Kinsey was an admitted eugenicist, something that Reisman uses to further her Nazi case. But Reisman fails to reveal the heavy Jewish hand in the eugenics movement, which predates Nazi Germany.[5] Eugenics was certainly not an exclusively Nazi practice.

Reisman also heavily identifies with Jewish suffering in the form of the iconic Holocaust dogma of Judaism. And she doesn’t hold back when linking it with Kinsey and the sexual revolution.

“And while Hitler’s Gestapo and SS tortured, shot, hung, and gassed millions on their march toward world domination, the Kinsey lobby prepared a sexual revolution for Western Society.”[6] Reisman likens the subversive cartoons contained in Playboy, Hustler, and Penthouse to the political cartoons of Nazi Germany.

Where Reisman is forced to reveal the Jewish nature of the psychoanalytic movement, she simply refers to them as German or European. The implication then is that it is a fundamentally Nazi movement.

“…European sex ‘science’ radicals preceded Kinsey. For example, by 1895, the German homosexual movement had grown so rapidly that they were a major power lobby,” she writes.[7]

Reisman was born to German and Russian Jewish communist parents, something that would also predispose her to anti-Nazi, anti-nationalist sentiment.[8]

Who really was Kinsey?

On the exterior, Kinsey was neither a homosexual nor a revolutionary. He voted Republican as a capitalist (Christian raised), believed in restricting immigration, and even advocated eugenics. But on the inside, he was a tormented and possibly demonically possessed man, starting in early childhood. Kinsey engaged in self-torture (as a form of pleasure), other perversions, and likely serious crimes. He was a bi-sexual at best and a pederast and full-blown homosexual at worst. And according to U.S. Congress, he caused “incalculable” damage to the moral structure of American society with the publishing of his Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and the following female volume (1953).

As Kinsey matured on the outside, becoming an adult, he brought his perversions with him to Indiana University, where he became known as a perverted professor who would constantly harass and stalk men, and especially women, on campus for his so-called sex research.  Where Kinsey couldn’t obtain actual research on average Americans, which was the case most of the time, he allegedly used prostitutes, homosexuals, pederasts, pedophiles, and rapists—who provided the bulk of his data. The sexual revolution in 1950s America turned out to be based almost entirely on the habits of these sexual deviants, and not everyday Americans as most were led to believe.

The case for Kinsey as crypto-psychoanalyst

U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy and U.S. Congress viewed Kinsey and his sex research institute as communist insurgents and the furtherance of the Jewish psychoanalytic movement, fulfilling the words of psychoanalytic father Freud, who said the psychoanalysts were “bringing them [Americans] the plague.”

“Psychoanalysts think Kinsey’s work will advance the status of psychoanalysis by 50 years. I am inclined to think that it will change a good many things,” wrote Robert S. Morrison in his diary about Kinsey and his “research,” which was being given prominent coverage in the press. Morrison was associate director of the Medical Science Division of the Rockefeller Foundation, assistant to director Alan Gregg.

Psychoanalysis appears to be a Kabbalistic[9] black art, culminating in the victim being mind controlled and supplanted with false memories and/or ideas. Freud was a Zionist and Lurianic Kabbalist. Kinsey’s use of this black art managed to fool the entire American public into thinking average men and women were largely promiscuous, homosexual, and repressed wild animals. And like Freud, Kinsey would psychoanalyze (gather sex history) his colleagues and financial backers in order to control them, or blackmail them if necessary. Kinsey was every bit the charismatic cult leader that Freud was.[10] Another similarity between Kinsey and Freud was their views on “childhood sexuality.” Freud said that children were sexual but that it was latent until puberty; Kinsey took this further, saying children were completely sexual from birth. Even the Jewish founder of Playboy, Hugh Hefner, didn’t leave out Freud when he said Freud and Kinsey “have done more for sex than any other men who ever lived.” Hefner even recommends The Freudian Approach and The Kinsey Approach when trying to seduce a female virgin. At times, Reisman appears to defend her fellow Jew Freud in contrast to the monster Kinsey.[11]

Unfortunately, and not surprisingly, the good people in the Reece Committee (Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations, 1952-54), after years of trying, failed to shut down Kinsey and his institute of perversion, following a lengthy examination of U.S. tax-exempt foundations. The Rockefeller alliance with the already radically left-wing Jewish media proved to be too much, as did the Zionist control of then President Harry Truman, a 33rd degree Freemason. Ironically, Reisman admits that Kinsey had powerful allies in the media. But of course, we are supposed to believe the U.S. media then was Nazi-controlled, not Jewish-controlled.[12] She even goes as far as saying that the Rockefellers carried out a “media Blitzkrieg” to promote Kinsey and his work. Perhaps had Reisman known that the enemy wasn’t simply Nazis, assuming she was ignorant, she would have been better prepared when academia and the media attacked her research on Kinsey. (See overrepresentation of Jews in the sexual liberation movement)

Perhaps seeing the U.S. Congressional attempts to eradicate subversive homosexual elements as a threat to the greater goals of the psychoanalytic movement in which he was carrying out, Kinsey soon agreed to serve on an advisory committee to the communist Mattachine Foundation, an early gay rights organization co-founded by the Jewish Franklin E. Kameny, one of America’s most significant gay rights activists.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activist Larry Kramer (Jewish) holding up a Kinsey Institute T-Shirt. Notice the Illuminist “6” beside the half hexagram. The Kinsey Institute’s current director is the Jewish Julia Heiman.

Kinsey may have shown disdain for Judaism as a religious institution as it relates to perceived moral restraint, but there doesn’t seem to be any evidence that he engaged in any anti-Semitism. And like Freud, Kinsey expressed his view that sexual repression (self-control) led to pathology.[13] University of California-Long Beach Professor of psychology Kevin MacDonald, perhaps Freud’s greatest modern critic, explains in The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (1998),“Many early proponents viewed psychoanalysis as a redemptive messianic movement that would end anti-Semitism by freeing the world of neuroses produced by sexually repressive Western civilization…. The cure for aggression characteristic of anti-Semitism was therefore believed to lie in freeing gentiles from their sexual repressions. Although Freud himself eventually developed the idea of a death instinct to explain aggression, a consistent theme of the Freudian critique of Western culture, as exemplified for example by Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse, and Wilhelm Reich, has been that the liberation of sexual repressions would lead to lowered aggression and usher in an era of universal love.” (Pages 112-113).

Kinsey’s alleged anti-Semitism did carry with it the advantage of giving the sexual revolution in America a gentile appearance, following years of speculation that Freud and the Frankfurt School were part of a Jewish plot against the West.

“He has the temperament of a reformer rather than a scientist: fierily against hypocrisy and repressive law of every sort, censorship, etc., and against Judaism and Catholicism and Irishy,” writes Kinsey’s biographer James H. Jones. (page 611)  Are Jones and Kinsey ignorant of the Talmud? Or do they carry out the charade that Judaism is the same bastion of sexual morality that is Christianity?

Jones gives us some insight into his and Kinsey’s convenient ignorance of the highly sexually immoral Babylonian Talmud.

“Current sex offender laws, he (Kinsey) explained, were based on English-American common law traditions, which in turn were ‘a direct constitution of the Talmudic proscriptions on such activities and not the product of scientific judgments.’”[14]

MacDonald explains Freud’s strategic use of gentiles in the psychoanalytic movement.

“Deception is also indicated by the evidence that Freud felt that one reason psychoanalysis needed highly visible gentiles was because he viewed psychoanalysis as subverting gentile culture. After publishing Little Hans in 1908, he wrote Karl Abraham that the book would create an uproar: ‘German ideals threatened again! Our Aryan comrades are really completely indispensable to us, otherwise psychoanalysis would succumb to anti-Semitism.’ (in Yerushalami, 1991, 43).”

“Moreover, there were conscious attempts at deception directed at making Jewish involvement in radical political movements invisible by placing an American face on what was in reality largely a Jewish movement (Liebman 1979, 527ff). Both the Socialist Party and the CPUSA took pains to have gentiles prominently displayed as leaders, and the CPUSA actively encouraged Jewish members to take gentile-sounding names…. Despite representing over half the membership in both the Socialist Party and the CPUSA during some periods, neither party ever had Jews as presidential candidates and no Jew held the top position in the CPUSA after 1929. Gentiles were brought from long distances and given highly visible staff positions in Jewish-dominated socialist organizations in New York. Jewish domination of these organizations not uncommonly led gentiles to leave when they realized their role as window dressing in a fundamentally Jewish organization.” (MacDonald 1998, 111 and 94 respectively)

The powerful cabal that helped bring Kinsey to prominence likely saw him as the perfect gentile window dressing for the continuance of the Jewish psychoanalytic movement.

Kinsey, Freemasonry, and the Illuminati

Contrary to what Reisman leads people to believe, the sexual revolution didn’t start with Kinsey. Freud had an arguably larger and more influential role in the revolution, and according to author E. Michael Jones, the sexual revolution began in the 18th century when the Illuminati and Freemasons were gutting Europe of the Christian theocracy. Revolutionary Marquis de Sade (possibly Jewish but definitely an Illuminist), from whom we get the term “sadism”, was another key figure—possibly the pioneer of sexual revolution. And if Illuminism was largely a Jewish movement, then sexual revolution was a Jewish byproduct, helping to fulfill the Talmudic goal of bloting out the memory and name of Jesus Christ and the moralist standards attached to Him. Illuminists like the French Revolutionaries, Rockefellers, and the Frankfurt Schoolers have all played central roles in fomenting sexual revolution among the populations, yet Reisman has the sexual conspiracy beginning and ending with Kinsey and the Nazis. Ironically, Kinsey’s participation in the sexual revolution arguably began in 1948, the same year that Israel became an official nation.

Illuminist Aleister Crowley

It is not certain whether Kinsey was a Freemason; although, he was associated with many high level Illuminists. He had to be, in order to get the backing of the Illuminist Rockefellers and the support from the Illuminist-controlled press. Kinsey was untouchable even though there was clear evidence that he and/or his colleagues were sexually abusing children.[15]  Interestingly, the Kinsey Institute Logo, designed by David Enock in 1986, appears to be stylized after the Jewish star of Moloch (six-pointed star or hexagram). The Masonic square and compass itself was stylized after the hexagram. Then there is Kinsey’s association with high Illuminist Aleister Crowley. Kinsey allegedly went on a voyage seeking Crowley’s psychosexual occultist diaries.

The title page of Illuminist revolutionary Marquis de Sade’s Justine depicts the Illuminist triangle with the Cabalistic tetragrammaton. The Marquis de Sade was a key figure in the bloody French Revolution and also the father of Sadism.

Conclusion

While Reisman did likely pose a significant threat to the sex industrial complex during the Reagan Administration’s porn inquiries, she is also acting as a gatekeeper by not revealing the real movers and shakers in it as well as its pre-Kinsey history. Her intentions in exposing Kinsey appear to be sincere (Reisman’s daughter was the victim of a pornography-induced rape.[16]); however, it is difficult to believe that she is not aware of the leading role that Jews and Jewish organizations have played in the shaping of ideas of human sexuality in our culture. Her obsessive use of Nazism and the Holocaust in her works exposing Kinsey are nothing more than sensationalism and intellectual dishonesty. However, her work through the Justice Department analyzing and exposing the sinister nature of Kinsey, for example his child orgasm charts (tables 30-34, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male) as well as the resulting American Law Institute Model Penal Code, is impeccable, as is her work showing the negative effects of pornography on culture. It’s unfortunate that she hasn’t expanded the scope of her investigations. Perhaps she did but chose not to reveal it. Perhaps she is ashamed of the work of her revolutionary parents.

Alfred Kinsey appears to have been a psychoanalyst in the tradition of Freud and other Judaic sexual revolutionaries. There is no evidence that he was conspiring with some Nazi agenda to subvert Western social mores. History shows that the Nazis persecuted psychoanalysts and sexual liberationists; therefore, Kinsey could not have been taking direction from them. But her certainly fell in line with the eugenic goals of the Protestant WASP ruling class of his time. We are only left with the Frankfurt School and the Jewish New York Intellectuals, through the Rockefeller Foundation, as providing Kinsey’s direction.

[1] Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 1st Books Library, Second Edition, 1998, p. 55

[2] Judith Reisman, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, 2010, p. 336

[3] On Kinsey’s German, Nazi Pedophile Aide; The New York Times Asks: “Alfred Kinsey: Liberator or Pervert?” http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2007/02/on_kinseys_germ_1.html

[4] Judith Reisman, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, 2010, p. 29-30

[5] `Do not have children if they won’t be healthy!’ Haaretz, Tamara Traubmann Nov. 6, 2004 – http://www.haaretz.com/do-not-have-children-if-they-won-t-be-healthy-1.124913

[6] Judith Reisman, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, 2010, p. 59

[7] Ibid, p. 171

[8] E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, 2002, St. Augustine’s Press, South Bend Indiana, p. 571

[9] David Bakan, Sigmund Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition, Free Association Books, 2004

[10] Judith Reisman, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, 2010, p. 52-53

[11] Ibid, p. 174

[12] Ibid, p. 71-72

[13] Ibid, p. 44

[14] James H. Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey, A Public/Private Life, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1997, p. 619

[15] Judith Reisman, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, 2010, p. 55