Roger Stone concocted Pizzagate for Trump?

roger-stone-pizzagateBy Timothy Fizpatrick
December 31, 2016 Anno Domini

It appears that Donald Trump political operative Roger Stone made up the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory in order to aid the defeat of Hillary Clinton and distract from Trump’s promises reveral and Zionist manoeuvrings.

Hillary Clinton opponents, alt right pundits, conspiracy theorists, and members of the “truther” community alike are all still chasing the apparent Stone-rigged dangling carrot in the form of an elaborate, provocative, and seductive conspiracy theory alleging that members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for president are operating an underground child-trafficking ring from a set of Clinton-connected ma-and-pa businesses in Washington D.C., namely from the non-existent basement of a pizza joint called Comet Ping Pong.

The Pizzagate dirty trick—which alleges that Clinton campaigners John and Tony Podesta are the masterminds of the ring, extending to Europe—is based on a conveniently anonymous March 2016 hack of the John Podesta’s emails published on Wikileaks, a suspected CIA/Mossad front. Also convenient was the timing of the publishing of the emails by Wikileaks, on October 7, 2016, just in time for the election. The Pizzagate theory “broke” at the end of October.

Days later, on Oct. 11, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told reporters that GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone may have had advanced knowledge of the breach and the subsequent publishing of the emails on Wikileaks.[i]

“I think it is a reasonable assumption—or at least a reasonable conclusion—that Mr. Stone had advance warning and the Trump campaign had advance warning about what [Wikileaks founder Julian] Assange was going to do,” Podesta said. “I think there is a reasonable belief that Mr. Assange may have passed this information on to Mr. Stone.”

Podesta referred to an August 21, 2016 tweet by Stone in which he cryptically warned, “Trust me, it will soon” be “Podesta’s time in the barrel.”[ii]

screen-shot-2016-12-31-at-1-09-59-pm

“Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon also pointed to a interview Stone did in August with Alex Jones’ InfoWars, when he said he had been in touch with Assange through ‘mutual friends.’ In late September and early October, Stone repeatedly touted that Assange would soon release more information on Clinton, both on his Twitter and in another interview with Jones.”[iii]

Stone has denied the suggestion by Podesta; however, Podesta’s claim that Wikileaks timed the release of his emails to cover up the leak of the embarrassing Billy Bush-Trump interview is plausible. Furthermore, it may have been timed to overshadow Trump’s then-pending rape allegation by Katie Johnson[iv], which was tied to convicted child prostitute pimp Jeffrey Epstein, and to distract from Trump’s about face following his election victory, in which he began to refill the swamp with his Goldman Sachs cronies and other villains and shill for the Likud-controlled state of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the international Jewish organized crime syndicate.[v]

The claim that the Podesta emails were hacked by Russia is likely a distraction from the real hackers, who are probably operatives in the CIA, NSA, and Mossad—Wikileaks itself likely being a creation of the CIA and Israeli intelligence. Also, we don’t know that the emails published are legitimate. With Trump and Stone’s deep-state ties, it’s not implausible that Stone could have been given warning about the planned hack of Clinton campaigners or the plan create a scandal involving the Clintons (not that there aren’t legitimate ones). But did Stone himself develop the Pizzagate theory based on his knowledge of the Podesta email contents or was he fed it by the hackers? Going buy Stone’s past political trickery, perhaps a little bit of both. What is clear, though, is that Stone had the motive, skills, and time to orchestrate a dirty trick like Pizzagate.

Stone the dirty trickster and agent provocateur

Swingers Stone and Cohn.

Swingers Stone and Cohn.

If Roger Stone were indeed the author or co-author of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, it wouldn’t be the first time the middle-aged swinger has pulled dirty tricks for the Likud-controlled U.S. Republican Party. He has operated for both George H.W. and George W. Bush, Ronald Regan, Richard Nixon, Donald Trump (business and politics), and other prominent people. A lot of his skills were learned from his mentor, Roy Cohn, a Jewish pederast and sexual blackmail operator working in the U.S. government. Cohn was also the mentor of Donald Trump. Retired New York Police Department detective James Rothstein claims that Stone was part of Cohn’s pedophile entrapment ring.

According to Stone critic Mark Ames, the three major points of the Trump-Stone association rests on:

  1. Roger Stone’s dirty tricks specialty is manipulating voter fractures, and weaponizing anti-establishment politics to serve the electoral needs of mainstream Republican candidates;
  2. Roger Stone and Donald Trump have been working together since the mid-1980s, mostly on sleazy campaigns to help Trump’s casino business, but also in politics;
  3. Roger Stone and Donald Trump worked together in at least two major “black bag” operations manipulating anti-establishment politics to help the mainstream Republican presidential candidate.[vi]

Aside from Pizzagate, most recently, Stone implicated Trump’s internal GOP opponent Ted Cruz with the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It’s no coincidence that Stone’s longtime associates are, themselves, connected to the organized crime syndicate that orchestrated the murder of the Kennedys.[vii] Like Pizzagate, Stone attempts to use photographic evidence to prove his smear of Cruz.[viii] Perhaps Stone even came up with the “Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks” meme (also based on supposed photographic evidence), in an attempt to discredit Alex Jones’ critics and advance Likud’s false opponents in the alternative media.[ix] As with many of Stone’s dirty tricks, Trump publicly echoed the Cruz-JFK theory during his campaign run.

In 1972, when Stone was barely out of his teenage years, the ambitious Republican trickster went to work by entrapping Richard Nixon’s opponent for the Republican nomination Paul McCloskey. Stone had been working for Nixon’s re-election committee, CREEP, appropriately nicknamed by Nixon’s opponents. Using the fake name “Jason Rainier”, Stone donated funds to McCloskey under the pretext that it was on behalf of the Young Socialist Alliance. Stone then told the press that the would-be GOP nominee had accepted the funds, implying that McCloskey was an undercover socialist. The trick must have worked, as Nixon was eventually won the nominee.[x]

After aiding in the successful presidential campaigns of celebrity president Ronald Regan in the 1980s, Stone’s career of trickery encountered a bit of a setback and he was forced to resign from Bob Dole’s 1996 campaign. Ironically, the National Enqirer, a publication Stone has used to aid in his political black operating, exposed Stone’s sexual libertinism—namely that he was a bisexual swinger.[xi] Whether or not Stone was involved in Lew Rosenstiel and Roy Cohn’s boy-loving sex ring at Trump’s former Plaza Hotel suite 233[xii] is unknown.

Cover of tabloid Star from 1996 showing the blacked-out face of Roger Stone in its article on his swingers ad.

Cover of tabloid Star from 1996 showing the blacked-out face of Roger Stone in its article on his swingers ad.

Enquirer article in Swinger Stone. Click to enlarge.

Enquirer article in Swinger Stone. Click to enlarge.

Stone would eventually make his way back into black operating for the Likudniks during the Bush II era. He helped out George W. Bush in his 2000 campaign while under threat from the Reform Party and its candidate Pat Buchanan. Stone got Trump to join the Reform party and then leave it, under the guise of disillusionment, in an attempt to derail the Reform party’s growing popularity and split votes. Stone was also behind the alleged Buchanan baby scandal in a further attempt to divide and weaken Bush’s opponent, securing Bush’s victory for the Zionist cryptocracy.[xiii]

“The Stone-inspired Reform infighting served multiple Bush interests: It killed any possibility of a third Perot run, blocked the candidacy of former Connecticut governor Lowell Weicker, and forced out the party’s only elected official, Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura. Buchanan’s vanishing act—after Stone cajoled him to run Reform—left nearly a dozen party leaders contacted by the Voice convinced that he and Stone were conscious agents of doom.”[xiv]

 

Stone would pull off one more significant act of deception for the Likudniks running the Bush II campaign: obstructing justice in the Bush election theft.

Later that year, Stone, who calls himself “the GOP hitman,” spearheaded the Brooks Brothers riot that thwarted Florida’s ballot recount. By his account, Stone managed to rally right-wing protesters to assemble outside a voting center in Miami-Dade—a diverse county sympathetic to Gore. “The idea we were putting out there was that this was a left-wing power grab by Gore, the same way Fidel Castro did it in Cuba. We were very explicitly drawing that analogy,” Stone recalled. “The idea was to shut it down, stop the recount here in Miami.”[xv]

False-flagging, agent provocateuring, and causing infighting—these are the rotten fruits of Roger Stone.

In 2004, during the Bush. Jr. re-election campaign, Stone reportedly used FBI informant-black activist Al Sharpton to steal the nomination from Democrat Al Gore in order for Sharpton to become a strawman opponent to Bush.

“As it turns out, Al Sharpton entered the 2004 Democratic primaries on the payroll and orders of Roger Stone, who directed Sharpton’s attacks from the race politics-left against Howard Dean. And as the New York Times revealed that year, it was Donald Trump who took credit for introducing Al Sharpton—a one-time FBI informant—to his old friend and lobbyist, GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone,” writes Ames.[xvi]

One wonders from where Stone was getting the money to pay for stunts like this. Was it coming from Tel Aviv or through one of Israel’s CIA conduits?

“After neutralizing the Reform Party and blocking the Florida recount with his hired “Brooks Brothers mob” Roger Stone was rewarded by President Bush by being put in charge of the Bush-Cheney 2000 transition team’s Indian Bureau Affairs appointments. Even in this, Trump did a solid for Stone, signing his name on a fake letter written by Stone in order to sink the nomination of the “wrong” Indian tribal leader who wasn’t Stone’s man. The fake Trump letter ensured that Stone’s man, Neal McCaleb, was given the job as head of Bush’s Indian Affairs Bureau instead.”

These are just some of the Stone-Trump dirty tricks politics. I am sure we will learn some more as the Trump administration devolves into an even greater Likud front and the opposition grows more tired of the lies and treachery.

Zionist David Seaman, the Pizzagate fall guy?

Either David Seaman is the real author or co-author of Pizzagate or he is the front should Stone’s potential role behind it be revealed to the public. Either way, Seaman is as suspicious as Stone. The former mainstream media journalist’s surname is ironic considering the content of the Pizzagate conspiracy claims. His role in the Trump campaign earlier this fall seems to have been to promote the theory that Hillary Clinton was on the verge of dying. And he had help from almost all in the alternative media in spreading this distraction, which turned out to be false. Clinton is alive and well, it seems. For what purpose this little tale served is for speculation. With so many damning revelations about Trump and his character during the presidential race, it could have served to distract from dozens of things. Overall, it was a suspicious diversion coming from a mainstream media “reporter”, who ended up allegedly being fired as a result of fixating on this one topic. Following this firing, he apparently moved on to Pizzagate. Seaman is Jewish and also Zionist.[xvii] With this, his role in the Likud-controlled GOP and its propagation of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory makes more sense.

pizzagatehoax

The Pizzagate evidence

blogmapnapkinThe initial Pizzagate evidence was the supposed pedophile code John Podesta used in his emails. It was based on a “pizza-related map” on a handkerchief, which could have been nothing more than a logo-clad napkin with a map to a pizzeria. Secondary evidence, most of which has been debunked, included a series of perverted photos, some of which involved Kim Noble’s Satanic ritual abuse art and had nothing to do with anyone involved in Pizzagate. Like Stone’s other dubious photographic evidence, Pizzagate theorists used a batch of photos supposedly obtained from Comet Ping Pong owner James Alefantis’ social media accounts to advance their theories. It’s pointless to comment on the supposed photos until it can be proven that they are authentic. The same goes for the Podesta emails. But what we can comment on is the photoshopping of the fictitious pedophile code used to scandalize Podesta. Also, Stone’s apparent history of forging documents lends credibility to the thesis of this article. The photoshopper (Stone or Seaman?) added a “white” category to the homosexual underground handkerchief code (did Stone select this handkerchief code based on his own knowledge of this code, himself being involved in the homosexual underworld?). The photoshopped graphic describes the category as “pedo/virgin”. A simple online search of a more exhaustive homosexual handkerchief[xviii] code does indeed reveal a white category; however, it does not mean pedo or virgin. Furthermore, the code is not necessarily universally adopted by all homosexuals, or other sexual deviants. Evidence suggests that some perverts use localized codes, ones that they develop specifically for their group, like in the case of 4chan, which does seem to use “cheese pizza” as sort of adaptive acronym for “child porn”. Ironically, 4chan, a known pedophile hangout, was instrumental in spreading the Pizzagate theory. Regardless, there is nothing to substantiate the alleged code used in the Podesta emails. It’s all wild speculation and reaching.

Another photographic piece of “evidence” used by the theorists is a police sketching of the supposed Madeline McCann kidnapper. Even though the police sketching is two different renderings of one man, the Pizzagaters use it to prop up their theory that it’s two renderings of two men—whom they claim is John and Tony Podesta. From there, there is virtually nowhere the Pizzagate theorists won’t go. They try to to tie Pizzagate to every child-sex scandal in history and then accuse skeptics of being pedophiles and child rapist sympathizers for not automatically accepting their cockamamie theories.

Some Pizzagaters will admit to the flimsiness of the core evidence but will ask “what about all the other stuff?”. Using a basic chain of logic, the other stuff is all meaningless until the primary evidence can be proven.

Wikileaks the Zionist psyop

Assange

It’s debated whether Wikileaks has “leaked” anything from its archive of hacks that has had any significance in world affairs and politics. It’s also debated as to the legitimacy of its hacked content, which has been gathering for ten years now. But what is known is that Wikileaks has rarely, if ever, leaked anything of significance as it pertains to Zionism and the state of Israel. Out of all the scandals and corruption in the world, Wikileaks has never managed to implicate the world’s biggest conspirator in any significant wrongdoing. This wouldn’t be a coincidence had Wikileaks been a Mossad/CIA-controlled psyop. In fact, Wikileaks has not only omitted and covered up Israeli/Zionist crimes, it has worked to promote its propaganda, like the Likud lie that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.[xix] Furthermore, it appears that Wikileaks may be the direct creation of none other than the Rothschild dynasty. It goes without saying that the Rothschild agenda is the same as that of Likud and their lackeys in the American GOP. From wherever Wikileaks supposedly obtained the Podesta emails, it was with the blessing of the Zionist establishment.

Perhaps the biggest red flag to the legitimacy of Wikileaks is the miraculous elusiveness and survival of its founder Julian Assange, who has managed to dodge the greatest, most ubiquitous surveillance state in world history. Assange makes it all too easy to dismiss him as a Zionist-Rothschild COINTELPRO operative when he makes comments like the following:

“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”[xx]

As we can see, Roger Stone, Donald Trump, David Seaman, and Wikileaks all have one thing in common: Israel. Pizzagate can only be a clever Likud distraction to coverup the crimes and corruption of Trump and his loyalty to Israel and the money power.

Stone claims he has been in touch with Assange through “mutual friends”.[xxi] If true, it can only be intelligence friends, likely in the CIA/Mossad.

Pizzagate also serves to discredit the “truther” movement, aid Internet censorship agenda

While many in the truth community spend countless hours chasing the breadcrumbs likely left by Stone, and Assange, and coming up with yet more theories surrounding Pizzagate, the mainstream media and the conspirators poke fun at the truth movement and discredit it as a progenitor of fake news and lies. The mass hysteria resulting from this possible Roger Stone dirty trick has even eventuated in a recent false-flag attack, where an alleged gunman, provoked by a sense of Pizzagate justice, entered Comet Ping Pong for revenge. Fortunately, nothing serious happened. But in the near future, a more serious false-flag attack could occur at one of the alleged Pizzagate-associated businesses in Washington, DC, resulting in more serious demonization of the alternative media and truthers alike and likely new, sweeping Internet censorship legislation.

Pizzagate, like the Jade Helm, flat Earth, and Jesuit conspiracy theories, could be part of a Cass Sunstein-like attempt to discredit legitimate conspiracies by flooding the truth movement with plausible yet ultimately false and fake conspiracy theories. Of course, an operation like this would also have to be carried out by the intelligence community and its hatchet men like Roger Stone.

Notes:

[i] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html

[ii] @RogerJStoneJr, Twitter, Aug. 21, 2016 https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/767366825743097856?p=v

[iii] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html

[iv] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, Fitzpatrick Informer, Nov. 19, 2016 – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/

[v] American Free Press, Is Trump a Populist or a Pro-Zionist Spoiler?, Oct. 19, 2015 – https://americanfreepress.net/is-trump-a-populist-or-a-pro-zionist-spoiler/

[vi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/

[vii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part II, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/08/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-ii/

[viii] Durkin, J.D., Roger Stone ‘Confirms’ Rafael Cruz Was Tied to JFK in the Most Roger Stone Way Imaginable, May 4, 2016, Mediate – http://www.mediaite.com/online/roger-stone-confirms-rafael-cruz-was-tied-to-jfk-in-the-most-roger-stone-way-imaginable/

[ix] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Is Alex Jones behind the conspiracy theory that he is Bill Hicks?, Nov. 26, 2014, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/is-alex-jones-behind-the-conspiracy-theory-that-he-is-bill-hicks/

[x] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone

[xi] ibid

[xii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/

[xiii] Barrett, Wayne, The sex scandal that put Bush in the White House, May 11, 2004, The Village Voice – http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-sex-scandal-that-put-bush-in-the-white-house-6407173

[xiv] ibid

[xv] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone

[xvi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/

[xvii] Pizzagate researcher David Seaman shills for Israel – http://www.infostormer.com/pizzagate-researcher-david-seaman-shills-for-israel/

[xviii] Gay hanky codes – https://user.xmission.com/~trevin/hanky.html

[xix] Azaziah, Jonathan, Wikileaks is Zionist poison, Oct. 28, 2010, Mask of Zion – http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/10/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison.html

[xx] Bell, Matthew, Wanted by the CIA: The man who keeps no secrets, July 17, 2010, The Independent – http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wanted-by-the-cia-the-man-who-keeps-no-secrets-2029083.html

[xxi] Jones, Alex, Roger Stone breaks down Hillary’s kill count, Aug. 13, 2016, Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L-k897lV_I

 

Evidence of vote fraud in Irish gay marriage referendum

By Northsider
December 12, 2015 Anno Domini

Michael Hoffman’s infatuation with Protestantism – Part III

Irish referendum fraudIt should go without saying that no sane Catholic would deny the problem of child abuse among Catholic clergy – and the even larger problem of “ephebic” abuse (around 80 per cent of the convictions of Catholic priests for sexual offences involved adolescent youths – a fact almost never mentioned by liberal pro-homosexual critics of the Church). The real argument is not that Catholic bishops have no case to answer, but that the singling out of the Catholic Church over clerical sex abuse is a particularly poisonous reheating of ancient Zio/Protestant/Masonic black legends. Hoffman himself frequently complains, with plenty of justification, that the corporate media ignore the huge scandal of rabbinical abuse, but he himself, in common with the corporate media, ignores the many cases of clerical abuse in Protestant denominations – abuse that plenty of Protestants – to their credit – have condemned the media for deliberately suppressing (1). If one were to read only the corporate media, one might assume that only Catholic clergy had ever been found guilty of abuse of children and adolescents; if one were to read only the Protestant fan-boy Hoffman, one would assume that only Catholic AND Jewish clergy had been found guilty of such abuse.

Like most Trads, Hoffman accepts without question the official results of the May, 2015 Irish “gay marriage” referendum – another example of how much faith he places in mainstream narratives – as long they don’t very directly impinge on questions relating to the Jews and the state of Israel. To put it bluntly, anyone who takes the results of Irish referendums at face value clearly doesn’t know much about the systemic corruption of Irish politics – or western politics generally. To cite just a few examples of this corruption:

A chance recount in the 2009 Irish European parliamentary elections in a west-of-Ireland constituency revealed that 3,000 votes had been taken from a pro-Palestinian, anti-EU activist and given to a much more pro-establishment, pro-EU candidate. The count took place in Castlebar, the heartland of the deeply corrupt rabidly pro-abortion, pro-homosexual Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Enda Kenny. The really revealing thing about this scandal was the (non) reaction to it on the part of both the Irish media and the Irish Garda (police). The following day’s Irish Times newspaper noted the “misallocation” only in passing, and the state broadcaster RTE (“Rothschild Televised Effluent”) ignored it completely. According to the candidate who was the victim of this clear attempt to nobble the election, the Irish police refused his repeated requests to investigate the matter. It must be stressed that this fraud came to light completely by happenstance – a sombre fact that raises the question of just how many other attempts to nobble the voting process have gone unnoticed – and thereby succeeded.

In 2011, RTE’s tele-text service correctly stated the outcome of the Irish Presidential election several hours before voting had stopped, even though the opinion polls a day before had put the rabidly left-liberal winning candidate between 15 to 20 points behind a much more socially conservative rival. This weird phenomenon of television and radio broadcasters announcing the correct result of elections, hours, days, or even weeks, before voting has taken place, will be familiar to Americans acquainted with Jim Condit Jr.’s research on U.S. electoral fraud.

In the 2009 re-run of the Irish EU Lisbon Treaty referendum, there was an extraordinarily uncanny 20 per cent swing from the anti-treaty side to the pro-treaty side in EVERY SINGLE CONSTITUENCY. Video footage of the referendum count centre in Cork City on the night after voting had ended, showed a man walking out of the count centre with a ballot box tucked under his arm! No police, security checks, or supervision of any kind was evident at the centre, and people walked in and out of the building as they pleased – even though it was in the small hours of the morning, and the goods in the hall (the ballot papers) could not have been more politically and constitutionally significant – not just for Ireland, but for the whole of Europe (Ireland was the only state, the constitution of which necessitated a referendum on the Lisbon treaty – if the result had been NO for a second time, the Lisbon Treaty, aka the European Union Constitution, would surely have died). The same lack of supervision was true of other count centres throughout Ireland.

Alone among western nations, Ireland insists, for reasons that have never been questioned, much less explained, in delaying the counting of votes until the day after voting has taken place. Almost all other states begin counting votes minutes after voting has ended. If you want to rig an election or referendum, having 12 hours to play around with definitely helps.

In a transparent attempt to explain away the unlikely nature of the same-sex marriage (SSM) referendum result, the Irish media made the utterly outlandish claim that 100,000 young Irish emigrants made the journey home in order to vote for the proposal. This is preposterous – about as likely as suggesting that fifty million young Americans would travel home from abroad to vote in the final of American Idol. The idea that young Irish people would go to the enormous trouble and expense of travelling home from often insecure jobs in far flung locations such as Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and Canada, to vote in this farce, in itself goes a long way towards proving that the vote was systematically rigged. Moreover, workers at Dublin Airport, whom I have spoken to, readily confirmed to me that there was no unusual spike in the number of Irish travelling home in the days leading up to the referendum.

The Irish Garda (police force) and the Irish Law Society both took an openly pro-SSM stance. Both of these bodies are mandated to be above politics, and both are – in their different ways – crucial to the integrity of state procedures such as elections and referendums. Yet both openly flouted constitutional norms in order to support the SSM proposal. If that is not a recipe for systematic fraud, hidden in plain sight, what is?

The SSM vote was only one of two referendums taking place that day. The other referendum related to changing the law to lower the age when Irish citizens could stand for the Irish Presidency – from 35 years of age to 18. That proposal was defeated! So, if, as the Irish and international media claimed, it was young people voting in droves that delivered the SSM victory, one would have expected a similar victory for the other referendum proposal. Why would “progressive-minded” young people, of the type who would vote for SSM, vote to bar themselves from standing for the presidency of their country until they reach middle-age?

The official results from Ireland’s hard-core working-class constituencies indicated an astonishing 90 per cent vote in favour of the SSM proposal. Anyone familiar with the Irish working class knows that they tend to be “homophobic” for reasons that have little or nothing to do with organised religion, so the idea, touted by everyone from the New York Times to the Remnant, that the vote could be explained as a rebellion against the Church simply doesn’t wash.

International oligarchs such as Chuck Feeney and George Soros poured billions into the Irish pro-SSM campaign. Where did all that money go? Postering and leafleting cost next to nothing in a small country like Ireland. Does the real money trail lead to the purchase of holiday villas and new cars by referendum officials, police officers, and others charged with overseeing the integrity of the Irish voting process? Anyone who has read Brian Nugent’s book about Irish state corruption, “Orwellian Ireland”, would say that such a scenario is far from unlikely.

In a way, Hoffman’s facile response to the Irish referendum official result brings us to the crux of “the Hoffman problem”. The huge evidence of vote fraud throughout the West should make every professed media sceptic or “revisionist” extremely cautious about drawing conclusions based on the results of referendums or elections – not just in Ireland, but pretty much everywhere. Only last week, Nigel Farage, the leader of the British “Euro-sceptic” party, UKIP, called the result of a by-election in north-west England “perverse” – and hinted strongly that the election had been rigged. The pro-Palestinian campaigner and bête noire of British Zionists, George Galloway, made similar allegations of fraud in relation to his own loss of a huge majority at the last British general election. Many Britons believe the Zio-Tory victory in that general election was down to carefully co-ordinated rigging in several key constituencies. By the same token, Russian election monitors stated categorically that the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 was likewise rigged.

Yet Hoffman finds it much easier to question the integrity of the Catholic Church’s many historical condemnations of Freemasonry, than to question the integrity of the actions of the Freemasons themselves in the here and now. His relentless attacks on the Catholic Church are not the product of detached sceptical scholarship, but of irrational hatred, and perhaps some irrational love – of Protestantism – as well. There IS a case to be made that the institutional Catholic Church had begun compromising with the New World Order well before Vatican II, but someone who seeks to whitewash the corrupt and subversive influence of the Protestant Revolution is the very last person to make that case. If the pre-Vatican II Church can be blamed for anything, surely it is its undue cosiness with usurious-Judaeo-Protestant regimes.

Part I of this series
Part II

Notes

(1) “Garda Union Urges Members To Vote Yes In Referendum”: http://www.independent.ie – April 21, 2015.

(2) Baroness O’Loan “appalled” at Garda referendum intervention” – IrishTimes.com – April 30 -2015.

(3) “Ombudsman Reviews European Vote Investigation”: http://www.villagemagazine.ie – April 2, 2010.

(4) “Vote Manipulation in Ireland in Run-up to Lisbon 2 “: http://WWW.youtube – Sep 22, 2009.

(5)” Irish Referendum Count At Cork City Hall”: http://WWW.youtube – October 7, 2009: This short video exposes the complete lack of supervision at one of the major vote counting centres for the crucial rerun of the Irish EU Lisbon Treaty referendum of 2009. It should be noted that the outcome of this referendum had vital implications, not just for Ireland, but for the whole EU integration project.

(6) “Ballot Box Problems, Broken Laws Cast Doubt on Irish Lisbon Referendum Result.” corbettreport.com – 8 October 2010.

(7) “Lisbon Referendum in Ireland Was Rigged”: The Tap Blog – Oct 5, 2009.

(8) “Democracy is dead” says UKIP leader, as Labour take 100% of postal votes surge in one area” – http://www.express.co.uk – Dec 5, 2015.

(9) “Farage claims “perverse” Labour win in Oldham” – http://www.express.co.uk – Dec 5, 2015.

(10) “Oldham by-election: Police could be called in to investigate complaints about Labour victory.”: http://www.telegraph.co.uk – Dec 4, 2015.

(11) “Whitehall in denial over extent of UK election fraud, says Eric Pickles.”: http://www.the guardian – August 13, 2015.

(12) “Here is how the Election in the UK was rigged.” http://www.youtube – May 8 – 2015. For further information on the huge potential for vote fraud in the UK, watch the interview between Ian R Crane and Brian Gerrish, on Crane’s website, The Crane Report. In it both men discuss the extraordinary fact that the brother of a very senior member of the British Tory Party, Peter Lilley, runs the firm that controls the postal voting system in the UK. It should be noted that Crane and another leading British anti-EU activist, David Noakes, have both said the 2009 Irish Lisbon referendum was definitely rigged. Indeed Noakes says he believes that the first 2008 Irish Lisbon referendum was also rigged – by 20 per cent, and when that didn’t work they rigged the second one by 40 per cent.

(13) Petition: Rerun the Rigged 2015 UK election.

(14) “SNP Election Landslide Proves Referendum Was Rigged, Claims Russian Official”: http://www.herald.scotland.com – May 10, 2015. This Russian election official wasn’t being wise with hindsight. Russian monitors at the Scottish referendum stated at the time that the vote had been rigged; the election result seven months later only served to add much more weight to their allegations.

(15) Scotland Independence Vote Rigging Exposed”: http://www.youtube – 19 Sep, 2014.

(16) One news item I was unable to locate on the internet, in spite of a very exhaustive search, was a report that appeared in most major Irish newspapers in 2008, in which the then Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), Brian Cowen, was caught on a live mike in the Irish Dail (parliament) referring to the leader of the Fine Gael opposition party and his colleagues, as “Freemason f…ers”. Quelle surprise, a short time after this episode, Cowen was deposed as leader of the then governing Fianna Fail party in a palace coup – orchestrated with the help of the British intelligence controlled Irish media. The man he referred to as a Freemason f…er, Enda Kenny, became Irish Taoiseach in 2011, and following last Friday’s Irish general election, it looks likely that he may assume the same role in the next Irish Dail – albeit with a reduced number of parliamentary colleagues. Kenny’s coalition government has not only legalised abortion and SSM – it has also imposed a Rothschild/Goldman Sachs regime of draconian austerity, and has further exacerbated Ireland’s massive immigration problem. Irish media reports about Cowen’s “Freemason f…er” outburst have clearly been very comprehensively deleted from the internet. Indeed a few years ago, when I searched for this intriguing item, I could find only one reference to it, and that was in a local newspaper in New Zealand (!). Even there however, the f word had been expurgated – not the expletive f-word I hasten to add – the “freemason” word!

Philo-Protestant lies about usury; paedophilic hypocrisy

By Northsider
December 7, 2015 Anno Domini

Michael Hoffman’s infatuation with Protestantism – Part II

Protestant usuryOne of the most celebrated Puritans in history, the 17th century English poet John Milton, advocated no-fault divorce, one of many historical facts that completely refute the notion that radical Protestant liberalism is a purely 20th or 21st century phenomenon. C.S. Lewis, no philo-Catholic, acknowledged that in so far as the Reformation was a struggle between rigour and laxity, the Catholics were the rigorists, the Protestants the liberals.

Calvin’s own radical departure from traditional Christian views on economic and financial matters couldn’t be clearer: he explicitly endorsed usury and thus broke completely with the traditional Christian teaching on money (9). Hoffman attempts, quite absurdly, to muddy the waters by citing the Catholic Fuggers’ usurious activities, and certain Catholic theologians’ partial endorsement of usury. In so doing he ignores the crucial fact that neither the Fuggers nor such theologians formed the Magisterium of the Catholic Church – whereas Calvin very obviously defined the spirit and letter of Calvinism. The clue is surely in the name.

Hoffman argues that the Pope Leo X bull permitting limited interest on loans for charitable purposes, not Calvin’s teaching, was what really opened the floodgates to usury (10), though he never gets around to explaining why, if this is so, it was the great Protestant powers, Britain, Holland, Geneva, and latterly the U.S., where usurious capitalism really took off.

John Calvin

John Calvin

Regardless, of how one, with hindsight, views Leo’s bull on a prudential level, it was anything but a ringing endorsement of usury, but rather a partial and very tentative derogation in response to special circumstances. It may have been a foolish compromise with the usurious spirit, but the unpleasant truth is that most of us compromise in some way or other with the usurious spirit every day. Hoffman himself accepts donations through usurious financial institutions – in fairness he might not be able to carry on his work if he did not.

Hoffman argues that the failure of Cromwell’s effort to allow Jews en masse back into England proves that the conventional old-school Catholic critique of Cromwellian Puritanism is unfair. But again this is to engage in facile historical reductionism, whereby the context of history is ignored in favour of extracting isolated facts for use as debating points. Thus, while it is true that Cromwell didn’t succeed in allowing the Jews into England, it cannot be seriously argued that he did not plan to do so (11) or that the Puritans were not, in general, extremely philo-Judaic by the standards of the time (12).

In fact, the rise of “Anglo-Saxon Protestant” supremacism resembled Jewish racial supremacism in many ways – the very term White Anglo-Saxon Protestant” having its roots in crypto-Judaic national exceptionalism. The “Anglo-Saxons” were not especially Anglo-Saxon – recent DNA studies of the indigenous English population confirm what many serious historians and genealogists have known for years: that the English share more genetic heritage with the French than with the Germans (13). But like Zionists and German National Socialists, British Protestants invented an ersatz form of racial jingoism to justify genocide, enslavement, and persecution.

Like other philo-Puritans, Hoffman acknowledges that the Puritans were much more concerned with activity in the world than with contemplation, but he fails to see the implications of this fact for his attempt to portray these radical Protestant sects as at least partial inheritors of the true spirit of medieval Christianity. No medieval Catholic would exalt work and action over contemplation. The Catholic Church has always taught that prayer and contemplation are far more vital for salvation than economic activity in the world. When that order of priorities is reversed, as it was in much of Europe and the “Anglo-sphere”, in the centuries after Reformation, the stage is set for the triumph of vulgar materialism. One of Mrs. Thatcher’s economic gurus, the former Communist Sir Alfred Sherman, poured scorn on the large number of Spaniards in monasteries and convents during the Counter-Reformation era, in contrast to the “economic dynamism” of Protestant Europe.

This notion, that Protestantism brings in its wake dynamic modern progress, and commercial and industrial enterprise – as opposed to the rural reactionary stagnation of Catholicism – has been a recurring theme of Whiggish Protestant historians for centuries (the Whiggish philo-Judaic Victorian historian, Lord Macaulay being a famous example). Some corporate media commentators have even suggested that it is not coincidence that four of the five countries at the centre of the E.U. financial “crisis” were Catholic – Ireland, Italy, Spain and Portugal (the other one being Orthodox Greece). They may have a point: it may be no accident that Catholic countries should be the first on the hit list of larcenous City of London and Wall Street bankers.

It might sound like a curious thing to say about a holocaust revisionist, but Hoffman is in some ways quite a conventional thinker, all too happy to accept corporate mainstream media versions of events if they can be made to dovetail with his own prejudices. In this, ironically enough, he resembles the Traditionalist Catholic movement – a recurring target of his ire. Just as Traditionalist Catholics in general accept the media version of the Catholic abuse scandals without investigation, Hoffman does likewise, albeit for very different reasons. Whereas “Trads” embrace the media scandal narrative because they foolishly believe it can be made to vindicate their own critique of the corruption of the post-Vatican II Chruch, Hoffman does so because he thinks this narrative vindicates his own philo-Protestant dislike of post-Renaissance Catholicism.

Significantly neither he nor the Trads seem remotely interested in independently investigating (A) the reliability of the many allegations made against Catholic priests or religious, or (B) the context of the scandals. For example, in a recent piece on his blog Hoffman cites one of the many anti-Catholic books published about Catholic clerical abuse in Ireland, and suggests that the horrific revelations contained therein “apparently drove the Irish people mad” and led them to the ignominy of being the first nation to vote for sodomitic “marriage”. This piece encapsulates Hoffman at his worst: unbalanced diatribes based on uncritical regurgitation of highly dubious “facts” from ideologically tainted sources. Moreover, like the Trads, he never seems to consider the possibility that the pattern of cause and effect he identifies is far from happenstance.

Or to put it another way: an unbiased commentator would surely recognise that it is highly far-fetched to suppose that the anti-Christian media and media class suddenly discovered a selective horror of clerical paedophilia just at the time they planned to unleash an extraordinary intensification of their onslaught on vestigial Catholic culture. There is a familiar pattern here which every reflective person should recognise. Just as western media attacks on Saddam, Milosevic, Assad, and Ghaddafi preceded massive military attacks on these regimes, the relentless media blitz against the Catholic Church preceded a cultural Marxist version of Shock and Awe, whereby rabidly anti-Christian propositions, that a few short years previously had been confined to the outer fringes of the far left, were targeted successfully at the mainstream of respectable society.

Unbiased investigation quickly reveals that that many – although by no means all – of the allegations of sexual crime made against Catholic priests and religious remain to this day completely unproven. This is because, contrary to the corporate media line that Hoffman faithfully echoes, Church authorities, for reasons best known to themselves, handed over many billions of dollars/sterling/Euros, without any proper investigations of allegations – often in cases where priests and religious had been deceased for many years, and were therefore in no position to defend their good name (18). Furthermore, both Church and State authorities deemed accusations “credible” on the very flimsiest of circumstantial evidence, e.g., an accuser having lived in the same town as the accused at the time of the alleged offences.

But in the simplistic crypto-punk outlook of Hoffman and the Trads, the undeniable corruption of the modern Church makes every allegation against a Catholic priest credible, and therefore in no need of unbiased investigation – even when there were and are compelling religious (or anti-religious), political, financial, and cultural motives for blackening the name of Catholic clergy.

It should be noted that when it comes to World War II, Hoffman abhors his own logic. In that context he freely admits that Hitler was indeed a war criminal and “one of history’s prize fools” but argues that these facts in no way vindicate all the charges of systematic genocide laid at his door.

Incidentally, while we’re on the subject of revisionism, one of the ironies of the on-going anti-Catholic feeding frenzy is that Protestants like Dr. David Duke recognise it for the co-ordinated Zionist psy-op that it is, whereas the Catholic Hoffman – not to mention the Catholic Trads – refuse to see what’s staring them in the face.

It would be remiss to write on this subject without noting how the Zio-masonic media and political establishment treat genuinely credible allegations of paedophile rings in their own milieu. Since 2012, many senior public figures in Britain, living and deceased, have been accused of paedophilia. Some have already been sent to prison for such offences. Very recently, allegations of child abuse against former British Prime Minister Ted Heath made it into the mainstream media. Most of that media, including the BBC, implied that these were completely new allegations, and that Heath’s accusers were cynically taking advantage of the fact that he was no longer around to defend himself.

As anyone with even a passing acquaintance with the so-called alternative media can testify, this is complete bunkum. Regardless of one’s view of David Icke, it is a matter of public record that he publicly challenged Heath (in the Guardian newspaper) to sue him over precisely the allegations that many in the media are now dismissing as cowardly posthumous attacks on the reputation of the “asexual” former Prime Minister. Strangely the notoriously combative Heath declined to take up Icke’s gauntlet. The point here is that the same media which accepted without any reservation every allegation made against Catholic priests and religious, living or deceased, seem far less eager to form lynch mobs where pillars of the secular masonic establishment are concerned. Indeed many media outlets have viciously character-assassinated the alleged victims of establishment paedophile rings.

By the same token, many of the media that have obsessively pursued the Church on the issue of paedophile clergy, have themselves been deeply and very directly implicated in the cover-up of paedophile networks. The BBC, a deeply corrupt organisation that has broadcast endless hit pieces on the Church, not only covered up paedophilia in its own organisation, but actively facilitated the notorious child predator Jimmy Savile, by continuing to employ him as host of audience-based children’s TV shows long after his criminal proclivities were widely known.

(Editor’s note: Footnotes to come)

Part I of this series