Roger Stone concocted Pizzagate for Trump?

roger-stone-pizzagateBy Timothy Fizpatrick
December 31, 2016 Anno Domini

It appears that Donald Trump political operative Roger Stone made up the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory in order to aid the defeat of Hillary Clinton and distract from Trump’s promises reveral and Zionist manoeuvrings.

Hillary Clinton opponents, alt right pundits, conspiracy theorists, and members of the “truther” community alike are all still chasing the apparent Stone-rigged dangling carrot in the form of an elaborate, provocative, and seductive conspiracy theory alleging that members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for president are operating an underground child-trafficking ring from a set of Clinton-connected ma-and-pa businesses in Washington D.C., namely from the non-existent basement of a pizza joint called Comet Ping Pong.

The Pizzagate dirty trick—which alleges that Clinton campaigners John and Tony Podesta are the masterminds of the ring, extending to Europe—is based on a conveniently anonymous March 2016 hack of the John Podesta’s emails published on Wikileaks, a suspected CIA/Mossad front. Also convenient was the timing of the publishing of the emails by Wikileaks, on October 7, 2016, just in time for the election. The Pizzagate theory “broke” at the end of October.

Days later, on Oct. 11, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told reporters that GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone may have had advanced knowledge of the breach and the subsequent publishing of the emails on Wikileaks.[i]

“I think it is a reasonable assumption—or at least a reasonable conclusion—that Mr. Stone had advance warning and the Trump campaign had advance warning about what [Wikileaks founder Julian] Assange was going to do,” Podesta said. “I think there is a reasonable belief that Mr. Assange may have passed this information on to Mr. Stone.”

Podesta referred to an August 21, 2016 tweet by Stone in which he cryptically warned, “Trust me, it will soon” be “Podesta’s time in the barrel.”[ii]

screen-shot-2016-12-31-at-1-09-59-pm

“Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon also pointed to a interview Stone did in August with Alex Jones’ InfoWars, when he said he had been in touch with Assange through ‘mutual friends.’ In late September and early October, Stone repeatedly touted that Assange would soon release more information on Clinton, both on his Twitter and in another interview with Jones.”[iii]

Stone has denied the suggestion by Podesta; however, Podesta’s claim that Wikileaks timed the release of his emails to cover up the leak of the embarrassing Billy Bush-Trump interview is plausible. Furthermore, it may have been timed to overshadow Trump’s then-pending rape allegation by Katie Johnson[iv], which was tied to convicted child prostitute pimp Jeffrey Epstein, and to distract from Trump’s about face following his election victory, in which he began to refill the swamp with his Goldman Sachs cronies and other villains and shill for the Likud-controlled state of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the international Jewish organized crime syndicate.[v]

The claim that the Podesta emails were hacked by Russia is likely a distraction from the real hackers, who are probably operatives in the CIA, NSA, and Mossad—Wikileaks itself likely being a creation of the CIA and Israeli intelligence. Also, we don’t know that the emails published are legitimate. With Trump and Stone’s deep-state ties, it’s not implausible that Stone could have been given warning about the planned hack of Clinton campaigners or the plan create a scandal involving the Clintons (not that there aren’t legitimate ones). But did Stone himself develop the Pizzagate theory based on his knowledge of the Podesta email contents or was he fed it by the hackers? Going buy Stone’s past political trickery, perhaps a little bit of both. What is clear, though, is that Stone had the motive, skills, and time to orchestrate a dirty trick like Pizzagate.

Stone the dirty trickster and agent provocateur

Swingers Stone and Cohn.

Swingers Stone and Cohn.

If Roger Stone were indeed the author or co-author of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, it wouldn’t be the first time the middle-aged swinger has pulled dirty tricks for the Likud-controlled U.S. Republican Party. He has operated for both George H.W. and George W. Bush, Ronald Regan, Richard Nixon, Donald Trump (business and politics), and other prominent people. A lot of his skills were learned from his mentor, Roy Cohn, a Jewish pederast and sexual blackmail operator working in the U.S. government. Cohn was also the mentor of Donald Trump. Retired New York Police Department detective James Rothstein claims that Stone was part of Cohn’s pedophile entrapment ring.

According to Stone critic Mark Ames, the three major points of the Trump-Stone association rests on:

  1. Roger Stone’s dirty tricks specialty is manipulating voter fractures, and weaponizing anti-establishment politics to serve the electoral needs of mainstream Republican candidates;
  2. Roger Stone and Donald Trump have been working together since the mid-1980s, mostly on sleazy campaigns to help Trump’s casino business, but also in politics;
  3. Roger Stone and Donald Trump worked together in at least two major “black bag” operations manipulating anti-establishment politics to help the mainstream Republican presidential candidate.[vi]

Aside from Pizzagate, most recently, Stone implicated Trump’s internal GOP opponent Ted Cruz with the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It’s no coincidence that Stone’s longtime associates are, themselves, connected to the organized crime syndicate that orchestrated the murder of the Kennedys.[vii] Like Pizzagate, Stone attempts to use photographic evidence to prove his smear of Cruz.[viii] Perhaps Stone even came up with the “Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks” meme (also based on supposed photographic evidence), in an attempt to discredit Alex Jones’ critics and advance Likud’s false opponents in the alternative media.[ix] As with many of Stone’s dirty tricks, Trump publicly echoed the Cruz-JFK theory during his campaign run.

In 1972, when Stone was barely out of his teenage years, the ambitious Republican trickster went to work by entrapping Richard Nixon’s opponent for the Republican nomination Paul McCloskey. Stone had been working for Nixon’s re-election committee, CREEP, appropriately nicknamed by Nixon’s opponents. Using the fake name “Jason Rainier”, Stone donated funds to McCloskey under the pretext that it was on behalf of the Young Socialist Alliance. Stone then told the press that the would-be GOP nominee had accepted the funds, implying that McCloskey was an undercover socialist. The trick must have worked, as Nixon was eventually won the nominee.[x]

After aiding in the successful presidential campaigns of celebrity president Ronald Regan in the 1980s, Stone’s career of trickery encountered a bit of a setback and he was forced to resign from Bob Dole’s 1996 campaign. Ironically, the National Enqirer, a publication Stone has used to aid in his political black operating, exposed Stone’s sexual libertinism—namely that he was a bisexual swinger.[xi] Whether or not Stone was involved in Lew Rosenstiel and Roy Cohn’s boy-loving sex ring at Trump’s former Plaza Hotel suite 233[xii] is unknown.

Cover of tabloid Star from 1996 showing the blacked-out face of Roger Stone in its article on his swingers ad.

Cover of tabloid Star from 1996 showing the blacked-out face of Roger Stone in its article on his swingers ad.

Enquirer article in Swinger Stone. Click to enlarge.

Enquirer article in Swinger Stone. Click to enlarge.

Stone would eventually make his way back into black operating for the Likudniks during the Bush II era. He helped out George W. Bush in his 2000 campaign while under threat from the Reform Party and its candidate Pat Buchanan. Stone got Trump to join the Reform party and then leave it, under the guise of disillusionment, in an attempt to derail the Reform party’s growing popularity and split votes. Stone was also behind the alleged Buchanan baby scandal in a further attempt to divide and weaken Bush’s opponent, securing Bush’s victory for the Zionist cryptocracy.[xiii]

“The Stone-inspired Reform infighting served multiple Bush interests: It killed any possibility of a third Perot run, blocked the candidacy of former Connecticut governor Lowell Weicker, and forced out the party’s only elected official, Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura. Buchanan’s vanishing act—after Stone cajoled him to run Reform—left nearly a dozen party leaders contacted by the Voice convinced that he and Stone were conscious agents of doom.”[xiv]

 

Stone would pull off one more significant act of deception for the Likudniks running the Bush II campaign: obstructing justice in the Bush election theft.

Later that year, Stone, who calls himself “the GOP hitman,” spearheaded the Brooks Brothers riot that thwarted Florida’s ballot recount. By his account, Stone managed to rally right-wing protesters to assemble outside a voting center in Miami-Dade—a diverse county sympathetic to Gore. “The idea we were putting out there was that this was a left-wing power grab by Gore, the same way Fidel Castro did it in Cuba. We were very explicitly drawing that analogy,” Stone recalled. “The idea was to shut it down, stop the recount here in Miami.”[xv]

False-flagging, agent provocateuring, and causing infighting—these are the rotten fruits of Roger Stone.

In 2004, during the Bush. Jr. re-election campaign, Stone reportedly used FBI informant-black activist Al Sharpton to steal the nomination from Democrat Al Gore in order for Sharpton to become a strawman opponent to Bush.

“As it turns out, Al Sharpton entered the 2004 Democratic primaries on the payroll and orders of Roger Stone, who directed Sharpton’s attacks from the race politics-left against Howard Dean. And as the New York Times revealed that year, it was Donald Trump who took credit for introducing Al Sharpton—a one-time FBI informant—to his old friend and lobbyist, GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone,” writes Ames.[xvi]

One wonders from where Stone was getting the money to pay for stunts like this. Was it coming from Tel Aviv or through one of Israel’s CIA conduits?

“After neutralizing the Reform Party and blocking the Florida recount with his hired “Brooks Brothers mob” Roger Stone was rewarded by President Bush by being put in charge of the Bush-Cheney 2000 transition team’s Indian Bureau Affairs appointments. Even in this, Trump did a solid for Stone, signing his name on a fake letter written by Stone in order to sink the nomination of the “wrong” Indian tribal leader who wasn’t Stone’s man. The fake Trump letter ensured that Stone’s man, Neal McCaleb, was given the job as head of Bush’s Indian Affairs Bureau instead.”

These are just some of the Stone-Trump dirty tricks politics. I am sure we will learn some more as the Trump administration devolves into an even greater Likud front and the opposition grows more tired of the lies and treachery.

Zionist David Seaman, the Pizzagate fall guy?

Either David Seaman is the real author or co-author of Pizzagate or he is the front should Stone’s potential role behind it be revealed to the public. Either way, Seaman is as suspicious as Stone. The former mainstream media journalist’s surname is ironic considering the content of the Pizzagate conspiracy claims. His role in the Trump campaign earlier this fall seems to have been to promote the theory that Hillary Clinton was on the verge of dying. And he had help from almost all in the alternative media in spreading this distraction, which turned out to be false. Clinton is alive and well, it seems. For what purpose this little tale served is for speculation. With so many damning revelations about Trump and his character during the presidential race, it could have served to distract from dozens of things. Overall, it was a suspicious diversion coming from a mainstream media “reporter”, who ended up allegedly being fired as a result of fixating on this one topic. Following this firing, he apparently moved on to Pizzagate. Seaman is Jewish and also Zionist.[xvii] With this, his role in the Likud-controlled GOP and its propagation of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory makes more sense.

pizzagatehoax

The Pizzagate evidence

blogmapnapkinThe initial Pizzagate evidence was the supposed pedophile code John Podesta used in his emails. It was based on a “pizza-related map” on a handkerchief, which could have been nothing more than a logo-clad napkin with a map to a pizzeria. Secondary evidence, most of which has been debunked, included a series of perverted photos, some of which involved Kim Noble’s Satanic ritual abuse art and had nothing to do with anyone involved in Pizzagate. Like Stone’s other dubious photographic evidence, Pizzagate theorists used a batch of photos supposedly obtained from Comet Ping Pong owner James Alefantis’ social media accounts to advance their theories. It’s pointless to comment on the supposed photos until it can be proven that they are authentic. The same goes for the Podesta emails. But what we can comment on is the photoshopping of the fictitious pedophile code used to scandalize Podesta. Also, Stone’s apparent history of forging documents lends credibility to the thesis of this article. The photoshopper (Stone or Seaman?) added a “white” category to the homosexual underground handkerchief code (did Stone select this handkerchief code based on his own knowledge of this code, himself being involved in the homosexual underworld?). The photoshopped graphic describes the category as “pedo/virgin”. A simple online search of a more exhaustive homosexual handkerchief[xviii] code does indeed reveal a white category; however, it does not mean pedo or virgin. Furthermore, the code is not necessarily universally adopted by all homosexuals, or other sexual deviants. Evidence suggests that some perverts use localized codes, ones that they develop specifically for their group, like in the case of 4chan, which does seem to use “cheese pizza” as sort of adaptive acronym for “child porn”. Ironically, 4chan, a known pedophile hangout, was instrumental in spreading the Pizzagate theory. Regardless, there is nothing to substantiate the alleged code used in the Podesta emails. It’s all wild speculation and reaching.

Another photographic piece of “evidence” used by the theorists is a police sketching of the supposed Madeline McCann kidnapper. Even though the police sketching is two different renderings of one man, the Pizzagaters use it to prop up their theory that it’s two renderings of two men—whom they claim is John and Tony Podesta. From there, there is virtually nowhere the Pizzagate theorists won’t go. They try to to tie Pizzagate to every child-sex scandal in history and then accuse skeptics of being pedophiles and child rapist sympathizers for not automatically accepting their cockamamie theories.

Some Pizzagaters will admit to the flimsiness of the core evidence but will ask “what about all the other stuff?”. Using a basic chain of logic, the other stuff is all meaningless until the primary evidence can be proven.

Wikileaks the Zionist psyop

Assange

It’s debated whether Wikileaks has “leaked” anything from its archive of hacks that has had any significance in world affairs and politics. It’s also debated as to the legitimacy of its hacked content, which has been gathering for ten years now. But what is known is that Wikileaks has rarely, if ever, leaked anything of significance as it pertains to Zionism and the state of Israel. Out of all the scandals and corruption in the world, Wikileaks has never managed to implicate the world’s biggest conspirator in any significant wrongdoing. This wouldn’t be a coincidence had Wikileaks been a Mossad/CIA-controlled psyop. In fact, Wikileaks has not only omitted and covered up Israeli/Zionist crimes, it has worked to promote its propaganda, like the Likud lie that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.[xix] Furthermore, it appears that Wikileaks may be the direct creation of none other than the Rothschild dynasty. It goes without saying that the Rothschild agenda is the same as that of Likud and their lackeys in the American GOP. From wherever Wikileaks supposedly obtained the Podesta emails, it was with the blessing of the Zionist establishment.

Perhaps the biggest red flag to the legitimacy of Wikileaks is the miraculous elusiveness and survival of its founder Julian Assange, who has managed to dodge the greatest, most ubiquitous surveillance state in world history. Assange makes it all too easy to dismiss him as a Zionist-Rothschild COINTELPRO operative when he makes comments like the following:

“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”[xx]

As we can see, Roger Stone, Donald Trump, David Seaman, and Wikileaks all have one thing in common: Israel. Pizzagate can only be a clever Likud distraction to coverup the crimes and corruption of Trump and his loyalty to Israel and the money power.

Stone claims he has been in touch with Assange through “mutual friends”.[xxi] If true, it can only be intelligence friends, likely in the CIA/Mossad.

Pizzagate also serves to discredit the “truther” movement, aid Internet censorship agenda

While many in the truth community spend countless hours chasing the breadcrumbs likely left by Stone, and Assange, and coming up with yet more theories surrounding Pizzagate, the mainstream media and the conspirators poke fun at the truth movement and discredit it as a progenitor of fake news and lies. The mass hysteria resulting from this possible Roger Stone dirty trick has even eventuated in a recent false-flag attack, where an alleged gunman, provoked by a sense of Pizzagate justice, entered Comet Ping Pong for revenge. Fortunately, nothing serious happened. But in the near future, a more serious false-flag attack could occur at one of the alleged Pizzagate-associated businesses in Washington, DC, resulting in more serious demonization of the alternative media and truthers alike and likely new, sweeping Internet censorship legislation.

Pizzagate, like the Jade Helm, flat Earth, and Jesuit conspiracy theories, could be part of a Cass Sunstein-like attempt to discredit legitimate conspiracies by flooding the truth movement with plausible yet ultimately false and fake conspiracy theories. Of course, an operation like this would also have to be carried out by the intelligence community and its hatchet men like Roger Stone.

Notes:

[i] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html

[ii] @RogerJStoneJr, Twitter, Aug. 21, 2016 https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/767366825743097856?p=v

[iii] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html

[iv] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, Fitzpatrick Informer, Nov. 19, 2016 – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/

[v] American Free Press, Is Trump a Populist or a Pro-Zionist Spoiler?, Oct. 19, 2015 – https://americanfreepress.net/is-trump-a-populist-or-a-pro-zionist-spoiler/

[vi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/

[vii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part II, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/08/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-ii/

[viii] Durkin, J.D., Roger Stone ‘Confirms’ Rafael Cruz Was Tied to JFK in the Most Roger Stone Way Imaginable, May 4, 2016, Mediate – http://www.mediaite.com/online/roger-stone-confirms-rafael-cruz-was-tied-to-jfk-in-the-most-roger-stone-way-imaginable/

[ix] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Is Alex Jones behind the conspiracy theory that he is Bill Hicks?, Nov. 26, 2014, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/is-alex-jones-behind-the-conspiracy-theory-that-he-is-bill-hicks/

[x] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone

[xi] ibid

[xii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/

[xiii] Barrett, Wayne, The sex scandal that put Bush in the White House, May 11, 2004, The Village Voice – http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-sex-scandal-that-put-bush-in-the-white-house-6407173

[xiv] ibid

[xv] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone

[xvi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/

[xvii] Pizzagate researcher David Seaman shills for Israel – http://www.infostormer.com/pizzagate-researcher-david-seaman-shills-for-israel/

[xviii] Gay hanky codes – https://user.xmission.com/~trevin/hanky.html

[xix] Azaziah, Jonathan, Wikileaks is Zionist poison, Oct. 28, 2010, Mask of Zion – http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/10/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison.html

[xx] Bell, Matthew, Wanted by the CIA: The man who keeps no secrets, July 17, 2010, The Independent – http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wanted-by-the-cia-the-man-who-keeps-no-secrets-2029083.html

[xxi] Jones, Alex, Roger Stone breaks down Hillary’s kill count, Aug. 13, 2016, Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L-k897lV_I

 

The Judaeo-Masonic Roots of Ulster British Loyalism

An Ulster British Loyalist mural depicting the two masonic pillars (Boaz and Jachin) along with a stylized Jewish hexagram (showing British allegiance to Jewry).

An Ulster British Loyalist mural depicting the two masonic pillars (Boaz and Jachin) along with a stylized Jewish hexagram (showing British allegiance to Jewry).

By Jude Duffy
August 3, 2016, Anno Domini

Contrary to what some in the alternative media suggest, Ireland, not Italy, is the birthplace of modern false-flag terror—specifically British Masonic false-flag terror. Around the world, many have heard of the IRA (Irish Republican Army), but few outside Ireland and Britain know of their ostensible adversaries in the Northern Irish “Troubles”, the British “Loyalist” paramilitaries. There’s a good reason for this: the global Anglo-Zionist Masonic global propaganda network succeeded in branding the Irish Troubles as a conflict between Irish nationalist fanatics and Northern Irish Protestants responding to the violence of these fanatics. But the Loyalist terror groups weren’t responding to violence from Irish nationalists: they instigated the violence.[1] And the Loyalists weren’t Irish either—they were British proxies. In fairness, they never claimed to be anything else, insisting always that they fought to maintain Northern Ireland as a British province.

So, Loyalist terrorism wasn’t an Irish “problem”; it was a British problem. However, from the point of view of the British Masonic state, the great thing about branding the Loyalists as an internal Northern Irish movement, was that it let the British Masonic state off the hook, casting it as a noble disinterested intermediary, desperately trying to find a solution fair to both sides. In reality, British Masonry was the covert choreographer of the whole grisly pantomime, actively directing almost all of the loyalist violence, and most of the Republican violence too.[2]

At first glance, it might seem like a mystery that the corporate media in Ireland, Britain, and elsewhere generally support Northern Irish Unionism and Loyalism. After all, the Unionists are ostensibly the “conservative” side in this conflict. Many older Northern Irish Unionists still attend church, eschew shopping on Sunday, and support the British monarchy. Even their dress bespeaks conservatism: at their Summer parades, they wear dark suits, old-fashioned bowler hats, and carry rolled up umbrellas. Unionist parties, too, still tend to be rather less enamoured of political correctness and cultural Marxism than modern Sinn Fein, which, under the disastrous leadership of Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness, has become largely indistinguishable from the British Labour Party, or the U.S. Democrats. One would thus expect the media to favour Sinn Fein over the Unionist fuddy duddies every time.

But it isn’t so. For instance, no media on the face of the earth are more mindlessly politically correct and left liberal in every respect than the Irish media. Yet they have had a very long-standing love-in with Unionism and Loyalism, and harp obsessively on Irish Republican violence, while ignoring, excusing, or even glorifying, Loyalist Protestant violence.[3] The same is true of the media in most of the western world, which whitewash British atrocities in Ireland, even though they were and are frequently both more sadistic and more indiscriminate than the attacks of Irish Republicans.

4795554547_945ee66200To solve this apparent conundrum of liberal media support for “conservative” Unionism, one needs to understand the deep Masonic and philo-Judaic roots of Northern Irish British Unionism/Loyalism. The Unionist establishment in Northern Ireland is joined at the hip to both Freemasonry and Zionism. British Masons and Zionists both live by the motto: “leftism for our enemies, right-wing nationalism for ourselves”. Therefore, for Anglo-Zionist Masonry, the craven political correctness of modern Irish “nationalism” represents a Masonic triumph over Catholic Ireland. A nationalist movement that embraces mass immigration, same-sex marriage, feminism, and the abortion of its own children, is not a nationalist movement at all, but an instrument of collective suicide.

Moreover, the common supposition that Northern Irish Unionism suffers from an excess of dour conservatism and narrow religiosity obscures its history of extreme lawlessness and Masonic subversion. Its roots lie in revolutionary Masonry and the cabalistic Anglo-Protestant-imperialism that took on its modern form in England in the Elizabethan era. Nor has it necessarily become more law abiding with the passage of time. The modern Northern Irish Protestant statelet came into being via an armed mass rebellion by Anglo-Irish and Northern Irish Protestants in the Edwardian era against the decision of the British Parliament to grant Home Rule to Ireland.

British Rothschild Zio-Masonry sponsored this Orange rebellion, which led to the partition of Ireland in 1923.

Cowen

Cowen

The treaty that codified that partition stated that no new laws enacted by the new nominally independent Irish state could in any way affect the protection of Freemasonry in the new country. To this day, the Dublin Masonic Grand Temple in Dublin sits opposite the Irish Dail Eireann (Irish Parliament). When Ian Paisley met the then Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), Bertie Ahern, in 2007, he greeted him with the words “I want to give this man a good grip”, at which point the two men exchanged what looked suspiciously like a Masonic handshake.[4] Brian Cowen replaced Ahern as Taoiseach in 2008, and within days of his elevation was caught on a live microphone in Dail Eireann calling the then leader of the opposition and his colleagues “Freemason F…ers” (I’d provide a reference for this story if I could find one, but although Cowen’s outburst was reported in all the major Irish media at the time, it appears to have been subsequently comprehensively scrubbed from the Internet!). A few months later, a huge financial and banking crisis hit Cowen’s government, and in 2011 he was removed from office in a media-orchestrated coup. Enda Kenny, the leader of the “Freemason f…ers”, took his place as Taoiseach in the general election that followed and is still Taoiseach today.

Paisley crossing the bridge over the River Boyne at the site of the Battle of the Boyne, for the masonic Independant Loyal Orange Institution's, Centenary Parade and Service. Photo by Chris Bacon

Paisley crossing the bridge over the River Boyne at the site of the Battle of the Boyne, for the masonic Independant Loyal Orange Institution’s, Centenary Parade and Service. Photo by Chris Bacon

Anglo-Masonry rules the roost in the Republic of Ireland every bit as much as it does in the north of Ireland, if not more so. When British Orange Masonic terrorists murdered 33 people in the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of 1974, the Irish Garda (police) refused to investigate the attacks. To this day, no one has ever been convicted for them. An Irish state inquiry headed by a former Supreme Court judge, Henry Barron, stated that it was neither far-fetched nor fanciful to believe that British state forces were involved[5], yet successive Irish governments have failed to challenge the British state over its withholding of crucial evidence relating to the bombings.

The Orange Order was founded by three Freemasons in 1795, with the purpose of unifying Irish Protestants in defence of British Masonic rule in Ireland. The “Orange” in the title of course refers to the homosexual paedophile William of Orange, and his successful invasion of England in 1688, and his subsequent victory in the Battle of the Boyne in 1690— a victory that cemented his rule. Many of the subsequent travails that beset not just Britain and Ireland, but also the rest of the world in the succeeding centuries, can be traced back to this decisive triumph of cabalist Whiggism.

Yet conservative and traditionalist Catholics, many of whom, consciously or unconsciously, have internalised the narratives of the “conservative” wing of Anglo-Masonry, tend to place all the blame for modern ills on the French Revolution of 1789—when in truth, that bloodfest was simply a delayed aftershock from the events of a hundred years earlier in Britain and Ireland. British “conservative” Masonry only turned on the French Revolutionaries after the latter began attacking the British Masonic agents in France who had played a crucial role in instigating the revolution in the first place[6]. Likewise, the Orange Order was formed in order to ensure that Irish Protestants did not stray into the Irish separatist revolutionary camp. In other words, the whole dispute over the French Revolution was simply two strands of Masonry slugging it out for control.

Orangeism is, therefore, only ‘”conservative” in the sense that all revolutionary movements need to exploit conservative sentiment in order to provide stabilising ballast. As Engels once said: “Nothing is more authoritarian than a revolution.” For instance, without the backing of “conservative” evangelical Protestants, and to a lesser extent “conservative” Catholics (aka “Neo-Catholics”), would the Trotskyist Neocon agenda in the Middle East and elsewhere have succeeded? It should be noted in this context that Northern Irish Orangeists, like their Protestant counterparts in the U.S., eagerly supported this revolutionary programme for remaking the Middle East in order to advance the goal of Greater Israel.

It’s also important to remember that it is eminently possible to exaggerate even the “contingent conservatism” of the Orangeists. For instance, the British intelligence-directed Loyalist paramilitary groups such as the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) and the Ulster Defence Association (UDA) are every bit as left liberal as Sinn Fein. Indeed, in conjunction with “Russian” mafia and Triad gangs, they are heavily involved in trafficking huge numbers of illegal migrants to Ireland, the vast majority of whom, quelle surprise, end up in the Republic of Ireland[7]. That, incidentally, represents another triumph for British Masonry: the destruction of the Catholic Irish nation through mass immigration of a scale proportionally unparalleled in the western world.

The late Reverend Ian Paisley is the obvious example of the Loyalist Protestant Zio-shill. Until his death in 2014, Paisley was widely regarded as the spiritual and political leader of Northern Irish Protestants, yet he was anything but a law-abiding man of the cloth. From the late 1950s onwards, he led and participated in a variety of terrorist and quasi terrorist movements. In the late 1950s, he formed Ulster Protestant Action, a group of loyalist thugs that specialised in terrorizing undefended Catholic enclaves in Belfast. In the 1960s he and John McKeague set up the Ulster Protestant Volunteers—a group that meted out extreme violence to Catholic civil rights marchers.

McKeague was leader of the Red Hand. The logo of this Ulster Loyalist paramilitary group displays the Jewish hexagram along with the masonic Egyptian winged sun disk.

McKeague was leader of the Red Hand. The logo of this Ulster Loyalist paramilitary group displays the Jewish hexagram along with the masonic Egyptian winged sun disk.

McKeague was a notorious homosexual paedophile and psychopath, who went on to found a fully fledged loyalist terrorist group, the Red Hand Commando. He liked to torture his young Catholic victims before killing them. It is widely acknowledged that McKeague’s close connections to the Unionist establishment protected him from prosecution for his many crimes[8]. He was eventually murdered by the Irish National Liberation Army (the INLA), in 1982.

1982 article from News of the World about sex abuse coverup at Kincora Boys' Home in Belfast. Click to enlarge.

1982 article from News of the World about sex abuse coverup at Kincora Boys’ Home in Belfast. Click to Enlarge.

Paisley was also very close to another homosexual paedophile loyalist terrorist leader, William McGrath. A pillar of the Orange Order, McGrath ran the infamous east Belfast Kincora Boys Home, now widely believed to have been used by British intelligence to entrap and blackmail leading figures in the Northern Irish Unionist and British establishments[9]. He founded and led the small Protestant terrorist group TARA. According to Martin Dillon, the author of several books on Loyalist terrorism and its British state sponsors, McGrath had been an Mi6 agent from the late 1950s onwards[10].

Paisley also took part in the 1974 Loyalist paramilitary led Ulster Workers Council general strike, which, in collusion with the British security services and the BBC[11], brought down the Sunningdale power sharing executive—an internal bipartisan settlement ostensibly designed to give Catholics and Protestants equality before the law in Northern Ireland.

In the early 1980s, Paisley formed a quasi-paramilitary group called the Third Force, which staged midnight incursions into the Irish Republic. In the mid- to late 1980s, he belonged to Ulster Resistance, an alliance of “respectable” Unionist pillars of the establishment and Loyalist terrorists, which used Israeli agents to import weapons to Northern Ireland[12] for the purpose of overthrowing the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland—another ostensible attempt to achieve peace in the north of Ireland that Unionists, Loyalists, and their influential British backers took exception to.

In the 1990s, Paisley’s party, the Democratic Unionist Party (the DUP), forged close links with the very most extreme elements in Loyalist terrorism. Leading members of the DUP held rallies in support of Billy Wright, an Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) terrorist who parted ways with this terrorist group on the grounds that it had gone soft, and set up his own more extreme group, the Loyalist Volunteer Force. Wright is said to have murdered up to 50 Catholics, but that didn’t stop leading members of Paisley’s party sharing platforms with him, and openly supporting his terrorist campaign.[13]

Wright was eventually murdered in prison by members of the INLA, but his sister has since stated that he had been an agent of British intelligence, which threw him to the wolves once he had outlived his usefulness.[14]

It’s worth noting that when Paisley died, the corporate media maintained a deafening silence about his close connections to paedophile terrorists like McGrath and McKeague. Paisley was an avid Zionist who regularly visited Israel and claimed that Northern Irish Protestants were one of the twelve lost tribes of Israel. A staunch supporter of western Zionist wars such as the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, Paisley, according to the British Jewish documentary maker, Jon Ronson, spoke fluent Hebrew and vehemently denied the presence of any global Jewish or Zionist conspiracy[15], claiming instead that the real global conspiracy was of Irish Catholic provenance. In order to demonstrate their Zionist credentials, he and his successor as DUP leader, Peter Robinson, both visited Israel.

The DUP is, without question, the most fanatically pro-Israel political grouping in the British House of Commons—some achievement given the iron control the Israel lobby wields over the Tory, Labour, and Liberal Democrat parties in Britain. Indeed, one of Paisley’s last acts as DUP leader was to form the DUP Friends of Israel. According to the Jewish News, DUP members have also pressed police authorities on the legality of anti-Israel protests, and launched fierce criticism of the Co-op group in Britain for its policy of boycotting Israeli products from the West Bank. Five DUP Members of the Westminster House of Commons were among only 12 out of 676 British MPs to vote against recognising a Palestinian state. David McIlveen, North Antrim DUP Assembly Member, sums up the DUP’s Zio-centric agenda thusly: “Whenever we feel there is an unfair portrayal of Israel in the social or mainstream media, we do our best to try and argue against it”.[16]

Contrary to the fervent support for Loyalism to be found in many British “white nationalist” circles, Zionism and Loyalism enjoy a very cosy relationship. David Trimble, the leader from 1995 to 2005, of the older and less populist wing of Northern Irish Unionism, the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), is also a fervent Zionist, and a leading member of the Neoconservative Henry Jackson Society. When he won the Nobel Prize for his alleged role in bringing peace to Northern Ireland, his acceptance speech was written by a notorious Dublin-based former Marxist-Leninist turned Neocon, Eoghan Harris. Harris writes for the Sunday Independent, a trashy soft-porn Neocon Dublin newspaper, where he waxes in an absurdly florid style on the evils of Irish nationalism, and the righteousness of Zionism and Anglo-American military interventionism. He belonged to the avidly Stalinist Workers Party of Ireland in the 1970s and 1980s, but like so many erstwhile communists, he jumped on the Neocon bandwagon in the 1990s and became Ireland’s leading champion of western military interventionism.[17] Other leading figures in Trimble’s circle—e.g. the Northern Irish historian Paul Bew—also belonged to the Workers Party—proof once more of the cosy familial relationship between Neoconservatism and the Marxist left.[18]

Like Paisley, Trimble had close connections to loyalist paramilitarism. He belonged to the paramilitary group, Vanguard, in the early 1970s and to the Ulster Resistance movement in the 1980s. Like Paisley, he avidly supports the various western Zionist wars of modern times.

Although most corporate presstitutes downplay its significance, “the Irish question” is still a dividing line in British politics. Regardless of whether they’re Jewish or not, most of the leading journalistic voices of hardline Zionism in Britain, oppose any form of Irish nationalism with at least as much vim as they oppose the movement for Palestinian statehood: whether it be Charles Moore, Dean Godson, and Michael Gove on the Neoconservative right; or David Aaronovitch, David Winnick, and Julie Burchill on the Zionist left, Anglo-Zionism and Hibernophobia go together like funny handshakes go with rolled up trouser legs. Last St Patrick’s Day, Aaronovitch, a Jewish Chronicle columnist, former communist, and arguably the most fanatical champion of Zionist wars in the British media, wrote a piece in the Murdoch-owned Times, condemning “the blood stained past” of the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland.[19] Like many of his ilk, Aaronovitch sees nothing to lament in the incomparably more bloodstained (and much more recent) past of the Iraq, Afghan, and Libyan invasions. Of course, a key difference between the 1916 leaders and modern western Zio-interventionists like Aaronovitch is that the 1916 men put their own lives on the line and didn’t demand that others make sacrifices they wouldn’t make themselves.

The one anomaly in all of this is the British far right. That persuasion has long been in denial about the Zionist and Masonic reality of Northern Irish Loyalism. Perhaps that shouldn’t come as a surprise, since so called British white nationalism is in reality often a thinly disguised form of Anglo-Israelist supremacism, which has never quite gotten around to admitting that the British Empire was and is largely a project for Masonic/Rothschild political and economic hegemony. Furthermore their objection to Zionist ethnic cleansing in Palestine, while just in itself, is often laced with a fair dollop of hypocrisy, in that the same folk invariably rush to defend British Israelist attempts to extirpate the Irish nation—not to mention England’s largely unsuccessful efforts to impose its will on continental Catholic Europe in the centuries after the Reformation.

Contrary to the British far-right’s parroting of Anglo-Masonry’s anti-Irish narratives, Orangeism is undeniably steeped in Zionism. As Avraham Citron, a visiting Chabad Lubbavitch rabbi from Los Angeles, noted approvingly, Israeli flags often fly prominently in Protestant areas of Belfast,[20] as they do at Loyalist-supported soccer clubs, such as Glasgow Rangers and Linfield. In an interview with the Jewish Telegraph Agency, prominent Belfast Jewess Shoshana Appleton observed piquantly that Northern Irish Protestants are more pro-Israel than their Jewish compatriots are![21]

Nor is this cultural and political amity all one-way traffic. According to Martin Dillon, Israeli agents have worked closely with Loyalist terror groups and front groups like Ulster Resistance, supplying them with weapons for use in the murder of Irish Catholics, and for the enforcement side of their organised crime rackets.[22]

Northern Irish Jews acknowledge their strong preference for the British Unionist camp, but put this down to the traditional Jewish tendency to “support the establishment” (yes, seriously!).[23]

Doubtless the fervent philo-Judaism of much post-Scofield Protestantism plays a part in all of this, but so too does the domination of Northern Irish Protestant culture by the so called “Loyal Orders”. This is the name given to four crypto-Masonic societies dedicated to protecting Nothern Ireland’s Protestant and British heritage. The four orders are: the Apprentice Boys of Derry – the most working class of the quartet; the Orange Order – the best known and most broad based; the Royal Arch Purple – a more elite branch of the Orange Order; and finally, the Black Preceptory – widely viewed as the poshest and most conservative of the four.

Though both Freemasons and Loyal Order members frequently deny any necessary connection between Masonry and Loyal Orderism, the rituals of Orangemen, “Purplemen”, and “Blackmen” tell a very different story. Upon becoming a member of the Orange Order, the neophyte is told that he is a member of “the elect”, and that as an “Anglo-Saxon Protestant” (itself a profoundly misleading descriptor) he is a descendant of believing Israel. By the same token, with no theological, racial, or historical grounds whatsoever, members of the Black Preceptory (Blackmen) are told they belong to the Israeli tribe of Levi and the Order of Melchisadech.[24]

If all this sounds remarkably close to the Jewish ideology of chosen-ness, that’s no accident. In common with other forms of Masonry, Orangeist ethnic supremacism consciously mimics the Judaic variety at almost every point. In his essay “Anglo (or British) Israelism and the Orange Order”, Professor E. Odlum states: “I now affirm as a matter of knowledge that every strongly intelligent Orangeman in the British Empire is a believer in Anglo-Israel theology”.[25] Billy Logan, the head of the Royal Black Preceptory, likewise declares unabashedly: “I fervently support Israel and we consider ourselves true friends of our Jewish neighbours.”[26]

As with mainstream Freemasonry, the higher one ascends to the upper echelons of Loyal Orderism, the more creepily occult the rituals become. As part of his initiation ceremony, the Royal Arch Purple candidate sits blindfolded in a mock coffin, and vows to destroy his own life if he divulges the teaching of the order.

He has a rope tied around his neck, and has most of his clothes removed, while a purple ribbon is tied to his shirt. The new recruit also partakes in a bizarre ceremony called “riding the goat”, in which, still blindfolded, he is wrapped in a canvas sheet and then kicked and tossed about by the assembled members of the Arch. He is then beaten with brambles (and in some cases holly) while the established Purple brethren laugh and bleat like goats.[27]

The initiation rituals of the most elite loyal order of them all, the Royal Black Preceptory, are just as weird, and involve drinking a toast from a human skull, and receiving instruction in the presence of either an “exhumed” human remains, or a skull and crossbones. To enter a Black Preceptory meeting, the individual must knock “I, 2, 3” twice in a swift staccato manner. “Blackman” handshakes involve both persons bending the four fingers of the right hand slightly and allowing their thumbs to meet. They follow this by covering their clasped hands with their left hands.[28]

A former member of the Royal Arch Purple, Protestant evangelical Peter Malcolmson, has written two books on the Loyal Orders, and does not hesitate to call their rituals Satanic.[29] In this context, it should be noted that in the 1970s, rumours circulated in Northern Ireland that Loyalist killers such as McKeague engaged in satanic ritual torture of their victims.[30] The killings of the notorious Orange murder gang, the Shankill Butchers, also featured horrific ritualistically sadistic elements that could be interpreted as Satanic. Colin Wallace, a former PR officer for the British Army in Northern Ireland, has admitted that as part of his official duties, he set up Satanic witches’ circles in nationalist Catholic areas of Northern Ireland, in order, he says, to frighten and demoralise the local populations of these localities.[31] Sharing, as they do, the same occult roots, and the same supremacist ideology, it should come as no surprise to find that both Orangeists and their British securocrat ringmasters are no strangers to witchcraft.

Orangeism is the Northern Irish face of Anglo-Masonic esoteric imperialism. Many Anglo-conservatives, seduced by the prestige the Empire bestowed on Britain—not to mention its pageantry and apparent traditionalism—assume it was and is a conservative phenomenon when nothing could be further from the truth. Although British Masonry invented an entirely bogus racial justification for its supremacism (the indigenous English population are not predominantly Anglo-Saxon and are considerably less “Aryan” than their neighbours) British imperialism, military, political and cultural, did more to advance the breakdown of national identity among European nations (including the British nations) than any other force in history.

G.K. Chesterton once said of the Freemason and British Empire jingoist, Rudyard Kipling, that he loved England not because it was English but because it was great. Chesterton saw the British Empire as undermining the essence of Englishness—a prophetic insight vindicated by events that began to take shape a few short years after his death. In its modern form, Anglo-Zio-masonic supremacism undermines the essence, not just of Englishness, but of all European nationalities. The virtual imposition of the English language across Europe, together with “Anglo-Saxon” economic models and ubiquitous surveillance, has not only shredded the cultural fabric of the continent, but facilitated huge waves of migration—waves that have the potential to completely destroy “old Europe”.

But then Anglo-Masonic supremacists might not be too bothered by that, since their form of jingoism has traditionally viewed Christian Europe (and Ireland), not non-Europeans, as the great enemies of “British liberal, (i.e. Masonic, anti-Catholic) values”. During the recent British referendum on E.U. membership, most Orangeists and most British Neocons supported Brexit, on the grounds that Britain’s spiritual hinterland was not Europe, but the multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-racial Commonwealth. Ironically, for all the chauvinistic chest-thumping of the Brexiters, the E.U. itself is an Anglo-Zionist project, as evidenced by the wholesale destruction of European languages, cultures, and ethnic identities that has taken place since its inception in the 1950s. Thus, spurning the E.U. in order to bolster one’s relations with the Commonwealth is akin to leaving Grand Orient Freemasonry in order to concentrate on one’s membership of the Scottish Rite variety. Both lead to the same place in the end: perdition.

 

Notes

[1] “A Secret History Of The IRA” by Ed Moloney (Allen Land, The Penguin Press, 2002), is one of several books that provides an account of how British security forces and armed Orange mobs came together to attempt to drive Catholics out of Belfast at the start of the Troubles.

[2] Moloney’s book is also a useful, if rather oblique, primer to the extent of British control of the Provisional IRA – especially under the leadership of Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness. There is now overwhelming evidence that the IRA was infiltrated at the very highest level: see for example the Irish News article:”Shankill allegations call into question all we once knew about a bloody time” (Alison Morris, January 25, 2016) about the revelation that an 1993 IRA bomb attack on a fish and chip shop in the Belfast Protestant heartland of the Shankill Road, was carried out by a British agent.

[3] Heresy: The Battle of Ideas in Modern Ireland, by Desmond Fennell (The Blackstaff Press, Belfast, 1993) elucidates the extent of pro-Unionist and anti-nationalist and anti-Catholic bias in the Irish corporate media.

[4] “Historic Handshake”: An Phoblacht, April 5, 2007

[5] “Release Dublin and Monaghan bombings files, Irish Foreign Minister, Shankill bomb victim”, An Phoblacht, May 17, 2016

[6] The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit And Its Impact On World History: Chapter 12: The Rise of Freemasonry, Dr. E. Michael Jones, Fidelity Press, 2008

[7] “How success turned a nation of emigrants into a magnet for migrants: The Observer, December 12, 2001

[8] Stone Cold: The True Story Of Michael Stone And The Milltown Massacre: pp. 29-157; Martin Dillon, Arrow, 1993

[9] ibid.

[10] ibid.

[11] See Paul Foot’s book, “Who Framed Colin Wallace” (MacMillan, London, 1989), especially Chapter 2, “A Clockwork Orange”, for more details of the unholy plot between Orange terror groups and the British Secret State, to bring down Sunningdale

[12] “Stone Cold: The True Story Of Michael Stone And The Milltown Massacre” p.105; Arrow Books, 1993

[13] “McCrea defends show of support for Wright”, Irish Times, September 6, 1996

[14] “Billy Wright Was British Agent”, Irish News, October 27, 2003

[15] Them: Travels With Extremists, Jon Ronson, Pan MacMillan, 2001

[16] “From Ulster With Love: Israel’s Unlikely Ally”, Jewish News, October 17, 2014

[17] The Lost Revolution: The Story Of The Official IRA And The Workers Party, Brian Hanley & Scott Millar, Penguin Ireland, 2009

[18] ibid.

[19] “Don’t Romanticise Bloodstained Past”, David Aaronovitch, The Times, March 17, 2016

[20] “Caught In The Middle: Irish Jews Walk A Fine Line In Sectarian Conflict, Jewish Telegraph Agency, June 19, 2003

[21] ibid

[22] Dillon, p. 70, p.105.

[23] Caught In The Middle, Jewish Telegraph Agency, June 19 ,2003

[24] Secrets Societies Exposed: The Orange Order, The Royal Black

[25] ibid

[26] Caught In The Middle, Jewish Telegraph Agency, June 19, 2003

[27] “Satanic Secrets Of The Orange Order”, Henry McDonald, The Observer, October 27, 1999

[28] Secret Societies Exposed: The Royal Black

[29] ibid

[30] Who Framed Colin Wallace, pp. 138-145; Paul Foot, Pan Books, 1989

[31] ibid

 

 

Matt Drudge undoubtedly a Zionist agent

By Timothy Fizpatrick
October 7, 2015 Anno Domini

drudge-matt-drudge-large*500 copyMost of the major Zionist spooks posing as journalists have been outed in the alternative and mainstream media in the last ten years. But still chipping away and maintaining his popularity is a lesser-known shill named Matthew Drudge of the Drudge Report news and gossip aggregator[1], a popular reference site for neoconservatives and their libertarian brothers as well as evangelical “Christians”.

Drudge, an allegedly gay[2] Jew who seemed to rise out of total obscurity (a hallmark of intelligence assets) after working in retail and telemarketing, jumpstarted his career by miraculously managing to break the Bill Clinton-Lewinsky scandal—Lewinsky being a Mossad asset herself apparently sent in to compromise the then president of the United States.[3] It was around this time that Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News chose Drudge to host his own Saturday night show on the neoconservative news channel. Although the show was short lived, top Fox Zionists like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh continue to give Drudge publicity.

Drudge Agenda

Drudge’s agenda completely lines up with that of all the Zionist-oriented news outlets, be it Joseph Farrah’s WorldNetDaily, Breitbart (who actually worked in tandem with Drudge at one time)[4], or the dubious shock jock of conspiracy Alex Jones of Infowars. They all push the same issues as those found among the Koch-neocon-Tea Party-libertarian network, which I have formulated into a convenient list[5] in my article on Jones and the Koch brothers. Unfortunately, the odd things that this network gets right, like its opposition to man-made global warming fear mongering and the abortion industry baits a lot of well meaning paleo-conservatives, who then get caught up in the various other fraudulent issues propagated by this network. Like William F. Buckley’s CIA-created National Review did before the Internet, its purpose is to homogenize the right into a more easily manageable group.[6] In other words, it has hijacked legitimate dissent and mutated it into controlled opposition. The right has been a sitting duck for quite some time. It has never been allowed to go beyond what the hijackers have designed it for. And it has used the kabbalist black art of dialectics to grow its scope of influence, occasionally allowing certain flashes of truth to glimmer in the sunlight only to steer the dissent into another tier of controlled opposition.

Israeli intelligence

When it was revealed that British media magnate and member of Parliament Robert Maxwell was living a double life as a publisher and Israeli Mossad agent, a whole new world of possibilities open up in the minds of inquisitive people. What a perfect scenario for Israel’s HASBARA (Zionist public relations). Instead of trying to influence the media to their Zionist worldview, why not just run the media themselves. So it is quite possible and, I argue, likely that Rupert Murdoch is another Robert Maxwell, which means Fox News is an arm of the Israeli government and International Jewry. To most of you reading this, it won’t surprise you. Fox News is quite open about its unwavering support for Israel and its dedication to faux conservative views. And it’s no different for the Jewish-controlled left in America. Zionist Sumner Redstone’s media left bias plays off nicely against the media right, creating the illusion of choice for viewers. Is it crazy to think that Drudge might have been groomed and brought to prominence by Murdoch and Fox News in the service of Israeli HASBARA and counter-intelligence, as some in the conspiracy community have claimed?

Stratfor built ‘relationship’ with Drudge?

According to Wikileaks files, Israeli intelligence gathering agency Stratfor discussed building a relationship with characters like Matt Drudge.[7]

Jewish Stratfor employee Aaric S. Eisenstein stated in an email addressed to Zionist Stratfor head George Friedman on Sept. 17, 2008,

Wow. Take a look at this. It’s small wonder that Politico is trying to follow the business model described below. I knew that Drudge was absolutely shitting money; I didn’t know how much.

From a targeting standpoint, Meredith, these are definitely players where we want relationships. If you hit the center of gravity, you don’t have to worry about the periphery, and this is definitely the center of gravity. Please pass this along to Brian. He ought to be reading this blog.

The Drudge link to Stratfor may be benign, but it’s interesting considering all of Alex Jones’ ties to the agency.[8]

drudgetweet-20130423

Drudge and Infowars

Although Drudge is quite moderate when it comes to linking to conspiratorial content, he does often link to Jones and HASBARA Infowars. This isn’t due to the 10 percent truth that Jones tells about conspiracies but happens because Jones will often venture away from conspiracies to push the Koch/libertarian agenda. This is when Drudge will link to Infowars. In turn, Jones, who has nothing but praise for Drudge[9], almost daily links to the Drudge Report. The alternative media was in a bit of a buzz yesterday because Drudge went on the Alex Jones show (but didn’t appear on camera even though he was in the Infowars studio) and made typical sensationalist claims, again about the supposed pending end of the Internet. Between the two shills, they exert a considerable amount of influence over disenfranchised paleocons, and of course neocons. They refer their audience back and forth between each other, creating a non-stop loop of distraction, misdirection, and fear mongering.

Notes

[1] Drudge Report – http://drudgereport.com/

[2] Closet homosexuality and homophobia – Source Watch – http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Matt_Drudge

[3] Thomas Reveals Mossad’s Role In Lewinsky Affair – http://www.rense.com/general36/lew.htm

[4] Hot links served up daily, Aug. 4, 2007, Los Angeles Times – http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-31639657/

[5] Alex Jones all Koched up!, Timothy Fitzpatrick, July 25, 2015 – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2015/07/25/alex-jones-all-koched-up/

[6] Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review, Timothy Fitzpatrick, April 24, 2014 – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/parallels-between-alex-jones-and-cia-front-national-review/

[7] WikiLeaks – http://search.wikileaks.org/gifiles/?viewemailid=1266882

[8] Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections, Timothy Fitzpatrick, February 4, 2014 – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/alternative-media-continues-to-ignore-alex-jones-stratfor-connection/

[9] How Matt Drudge Changed the World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCPNUKQ05mo

Alex Jones ignores adultery claim, leaked divorce with Jewish wife

Alex and Kelly

A screenshot of Alex and Kelly from the British documentary Secret Rulers of the World, which followed Alex during his alleged infiltration of Bohemian Grove. The five-part documentary was written and directed by the Jewish Jon Ronson and aired just months before the Sept. 11, 2001 “terrorist” attacks, possibly as a strategy to position Jones in anticipation of 9/11 dissent.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
September 8, 2015 Anno Domini

Leaked documents showing Alex Jones’ divorce settlement with his Jewish wife Kelly (Violet) Rebecca Jones have been circulating on the web for a couple of days now, yet Jones has decided to publicly ignore it, perhaps as a means of perpetuating his good-Christian-patriot persona as he continues his HASBARA/COINTELPRO operation.

The documents, first revealed by Aaron Wilson of AlexJonesCritic.com, show that the couple, after almost seven years of marriage, officially divorced on March 23 of this year after Kelly’s initial filing with the 428th Judicial District Court of Hays County all the way back on December 18 of 2013. As part of the settlement, Jones was ordered to pay Kelly a $3.1 million, as well as the deed to their Back of the Moon Drive, Austin, Texas estate, valued at just under $1 million. Divorces typically involve a 50/50 split of the assets between couples, so it’s very possible that Jones may be worth close to $8 million, assuming he has no other hidden assets. With Jones now apparently out of the house, it appears Jones is living at the Ashton apartments overlooking the Colorado River in Austin, Texas. Jones has done several broadcasts from a high-rise building resembling the Ashton building. The document in the “settlement” link above lists Jones’ address as 101 Colorado Street in Austin, which appears to confirm that it is the high-rise Ashton building.

Jones alleged to have had affair with Infowars employee

From Twitter, McAdoo in her apparent Wiccan attire.

From Twitter, McAdoo in her apparent Wiccan attire. Incidentally, a boyfriend of McAdoo’s named Zeale posted masonic photos to his social media awhile back (1, 2, 3, 4).

Alleged federal whistleblower Stew Webb alleges that the divorce was caused by an affair between Jones and an unnamed Infowars employee. Although Webb does not name the employee, he states that it is a female, based on his source within the Infowars operation.

I will not name this woman out of respect for her privacy. Everybody on the Infowars team knew about the affair, states Webb

Rumours are swirling that the employee is undoubtedly Infowars reporter Lee Ann McAdoo, a big-busted young woman who many believe was hired by Jones merely for sex appeal. Jones, being the intelligent PR man that he is, knows that sex sells.

Jones must protect his image
In order for Jones to salvage what’s left of the control he has over NWO dissent, he must protect his image and that of his Jewish wife, which explains his complete silence over the issue. As far as Jones’ listeners are concerned, Jones is a good Christian patriot and a hero. To think of Jones as an adultering pig with multiple ties to the Jewish lobby would devastate the trust he has built up with his audience over his 20-year on-air operation.

Conspiracy researcher and Protestant preacher Texe Marrs claims to have married Alex and Kelly. The irony of this divorce is heightened by the fact that Marrs has gone out of his way multiple times to vouch for Jones as the upstanding Christian patriot he presents himself as. Marrs has done this despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It’s strange, because Marrs, unlike Jones, tells the truth about Jewish power. He, of all people, should be able to spot a Zionist shill with great ease.

Jones misappropriating funds from his Infowars operation?
Is Jones using the proceeds from Infowars campaigns like his infamous “money bomb” to pay for his divorce settlement? Blogger Glenn Canady comes to a very likely conclusion:

This is only a story because Alex Jones continues to keep his huge divorce settlement a secret and is taking money from patriots which could now be going to the ex-wife and not to the fight against the new world order as he claims.  Alex needs to come clean on this divorce and admit that nearly $4 million of his money from his fans is going to the ex-wife now.

Alex Jones is doing a 24 hour money bomb on Sept. 16 to raise $1 million from his fans.  But since Alex Jones has kept his $4-million divorce a secret from his fans, how much of this money bomb will instead end up in the hands of his ex wife now?

You can’t put anything past Jones. There is no law that I know of that could stop him from misappropriating the money his naive fans donate to him.

HASBARA must go on
As well, nothing can interrupt Jones’ objective as an Israeli/Jewish HASBARA shill, especially following the defeat Jones conceded to one David Duke in a recent on-air debate. The debate proved so devastating that even Jones’ supporters walked away in disgust with Jones’ behaviour, coupled with the contradictory evidence Duke presented to Jones’ typical pro-Jewish narrative. Towards the end of the debate, Jones tried to save face, after realizing how bad he came off, by having his Jewish crewman Rob Jacobson attack Duke.

It appears that Kelly was the brains behind the Infowars operation, herself being a publicity hound for PETA at one time. Being Jewish just adds to the image of her as a Jewish revolutionary, with Jones as the parrot, whoring for Zionism every day on the microphone. But with this divorce, what direction will Jones and Infowars take? Was Kelly his Zionist handler? Perhaps his 34 Jewish advertizers, Jewish staffers, and apparent Stratfor connections will be enough to keep the engine running.

The Duke defeat as well as this divorce leak could be the final nail in the coffin of the Infowars operation. What credibility will Jones have left?

Libido Dominandi
If Jones’ alleged affair is true, what are the chances that this isn’t the first time Jones has let his passions rule him into a compromising situation? Could this, then, be the primary method by which Jones’ Jewish handlers direct him? Libido Dominandi is unequivocally the primary method the establishment uses to control and socially engineer people. For an exhaustive explanation of this form of control, I recommend historian E. Michael Jones’ most excellent book of the same title.

Above all, Alex Jones is human. His audience needs to unlearn the god-like image they have of him.

For more on the Alex Jones scandal, read the following:

Alex Jones all Koched up!

Millionaire Alex Jones’ mysterious Dogwood Creek home

Alex Jones pulls the Goldman over the sheeple’s eyes

Alex Jones’ Jewish handler at Emmis promotes Hicks meme

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

Did the CIA recruit Alex Jones through the John Birch Society?

COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

The Stratfor Infowar – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

Is Israel planning a false flag terror attack in Montreal?

Canadians Avert False Flag from Noworld Odour on Vimeo.

Khazar theory a scapegoat for Jews

James_Tissot_The_Morning_Judgment_400By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 7, 2014 Anno Domini

Regardless of if those who call themselves “Jews” today are indeed the descendants of Abraham, they are behaving in the spirit of the ancients who rejected Christ.

That is what matters most. People who obsess on the racial heritage of today’s Jews are missing the bigger picture. However, there is some value to the racial heritage question on a secular level. For example, if today’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham, how then can they, according to the Zionist view, justifiably claim a Biblical right to Palestine? But the focus of this article will be the Khazar theory as scapegoat for Jews and their anti-Christian behaviour.

Much of the confusion, present mainly in Protestant circles, is caused by a misunderstanding of Jesus words found in Saint John’s Apocalypse, chapter 2, verse 9.

I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

The confused are rendering this passage carnally, saying that Jesus was singling out only “fake Jews” as the synagogue of Satan but not the true descendants of Abraham. The root cause of this confusion stems from the heresy of dual covenant theology, which states that Jews are saved based on their race alone, not on their faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. The truth of the matter is that Jesus was speaking of the spiritual bankruptcy of ethnic Jews.

 

Khazars didn’t exist when Jesus spoke against the Synagogue of Satan

khazaria1The Khazar Empire, a medieval power that lay just north of the theocratic Christian Byzantium Empire, is believed to have been established around the 7th century A.D., several hundred years after Christ walked the Earth. During the 8th century, many of its nobles converted to Judaism. It is believed that many or most of today’s European (Ashkenazi) Jews are descended from this Turkish Khazar tribe. How is it, then, that Jesus could have been referring to these supposed “fake” Khazar Jews in His admonishment of the Synagogue of Satan throughout the Gospels? Were the Jews to whom He spoke indeed the literal descendants of Abraham? The answer is unequivocally, yes. In almost all of Jesus’ discourse with the Zionist Jews of His time, he focused on their spiritual blindness, not on their supposed racial legitimacy. In the following passage, Jesus makes it clear that the faithful spirit that was present with Abraham, not ethnicity, is what counts. The following passage also proves that Jesus did not view the Synagogue of Satan as Khazar Jews.

I know that you are the children of Abraham: but you seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and you do the things that you have seen with your father. They answered, and said to him: Abraham is our father. Jesus saith to them: If you be the children of Abraham, do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill me, a man who have spoken the truth to you, which I have heard of God. This Abraham did not. You do the works of your father. They said therefore to him: We are not born of fornication: we have one Father, even God. Jesus therefore said to them: If God were your Father, you would indeed love me. For from God I proceeded, and came; for I came not of myself, but he sent me: Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. (John 8:37-43)

Jesus then exposes the true source of their spirit.

You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. (John 8:44)

The consistent message in the New Testament is that one’s spirit towards Christ will determine his ultimate destiny, heaven or hell…to be reborn of the Spirit or to remain in the spirit of bondage to sin. There is no way of carnalizing the Gospels and making them about heritage or ethnicity.

these stones

 

The terms “Jew” and “Israel” were redefined by Christ’s coming

Adding to the confusion of the identity of the Synagogue of Satan is the definition of the term “Jew” in the Bible. In the New Testament, there are instances where Jew refers to a racial/national group and other instances where Jews are referred to as a spiritual group. Still yet, Jews are also referred to as an adversarial group, summed up in the term “Synagogue of Satan” and hinted at in passages like “they hid for fear of the Jews.” So how are we to determine what “Jew” means? Historian E. Michael Jones has a solid grasp of the variation in application of the term “Jew.”

When St. John uses the words “oi Ioudaioi,” he is referring to a group that has rejected Christ. The coming of Christ changed Jewish identity forever, something the Jews at His time comprehended only with difficulty. From then, the terms “Israelite” and “Jew” were no longer synonyms, because, Ferdinand Hahn points out in Caron’s book, “the true Israelites” from the Christian perspective “are precisely those who, like Nathaniel, recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

—E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 33-34

Upon Christ’s arrival…the situation changes, for the Jews have to accept Christ to remain Israel…John uses the term “Jew” two ways. He begins by saying that “Salvation comes from the Jews,” and ends by saying those who call themselves “Jews” are not children of Abraham or Moses and, in fact, have Satan as their father. From identifying the word Jew with “we,” as he does with the Samaritan woman, Jesus goes on to refer to what John calls “Jews” as “you,” which is to say, a group that does not include Jesus. Accepting or rejecting the Messiah becomes the principal way of defining what it means to be a Jew. (p. 36)

In other words, the true meaning of what it means to be a Jew has to do with the spirit that was present with Abraham. By rejecting Christ, the Jews also rejected Abraham, for the Spirit of Christ was with Abraham. However, now, the term “Jew” has been redefined as a rejecter of Christ, regardless of ethnicity; for the Jews, in their rejection of Christ, accepted Satan as their father.

There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)

One who distinguishes him or herself as Jewish is declaring their rejection of Christ and the spiritual redefinition of God’s people in the above passage from Galatians. Israel is the spiritual body of Christ, composed of the faithful, from all races. Spiritual Israel and the Church are one and the same. Fleshly Israel has been put away.

That because the rebellious Israel had played the harlot, I had put her away, and had given her a bill of divorce: yet her treacherous sister Juda was not afraid, but went and played the harlot also herself. (Jeremiah 3:8)

Scapegoating Jews

Those who continue to advance the lie that Jesus was referring to Khazar Jews when He admonished the Synagogue of Satan are not only guilty of falsifying history but also of excusing ethnic Jews of their rejection of Jesus the Messiah. There can be no excuse for a Jew, or anyone, who rejects Jesus. In a religious and spiritual context, the Khazar debate is irrelevant. There is no validity in the dichotomy of “fake Jews” vs. “real Jews” outside of St. John’s definition of “Jews”.  And Jewish behaviour today cannot be excused away as being the rotten fruits of Turkish impostors. Jewish behaviour today is no different than it was 2,000 years ago when the Jews cried for the release of the criminal Barabbas over Jesus and for Herod to crucify the Messiah. The likely reason why some push the Khazar theory is in a cowardice attempt to avoid being labelled a racist or anti-Semite whilst implicating “Khazars” in crimes and conspiracy.

Yet no man spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)

Another group advocating the Khazar scapegoat are British Israelists (Christian Identity) and some white nationalists. Under the same spiritual blindness as Jews, this group rationalizes that if they can make today’s Jews out to be racial impostors of the ancient Hebrews, they themselves will inherit the birthright or, a more extreme view, they are the true descendants of the Hebrews. The latter view has its roots in the millenarianist heresy that plagued England during the Protestant Reformation.

More disturbing, perhaps, is the fact that many evangelical Christians embrace the Khazar scapegoat, in an attempt to deify the Jews. To avoid implicating their god race in the world conspiracy—on the rare occasion when they actually admit a world conspiracy exists—these Christian Zionists dismiss it as being merely the work of the Khazar tribe, not “true Jews”. What they are saying then is that “true” racial Jews are racially incapable of sin, racially incapable of being the conspirators leading the New World Order. Of course, this is completely absurd and completely contrary to the basic tenets of Christianity. This belief is more in line with something from the Third Reich than the Bible.


Genealogical records destroyed along with the Temple
It is next to impossible to argue that destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the slaughter of one million Jews (according to Titus Flavius Josephus) in 70 AD was not the work of God that brought the Old Covenant to fulfillment as well as prophet Daniel’s Seventy Weeks prophecy. But also destroyed by divine will were all genealogical records of the ancient Hebrews. This is not only a major problem for racialists today, it is further evidence of the deeper spiritual truth behind the chosen-people archetype. If God intended for a small Hebrew tribe to rule the world for eternity, surely He would have kept in tact proof of this tribe’s racial authenticity. But since this was not the case, the loss of the Temple records is further evidence that God’s intention from the beginning was a faithful universal people unto Him, with the ancient Hebrew era serving as a mere type of bigger things to come. Saint Paul drives this home in his instruction to Timothy:

As I desired thee to remain at Ephesus when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some not to teach otherwise, not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith.  (1Timothy 1:3-4)

 

Henry Makow duped by Zionist

The Fall of Jerusalem

The Fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
August 12, 2014 Anno Domini

Normally I wouldn’t critique an article from Henry Makow’s website, as he posts from a number of different authors and on a wide variety of topics, not with all of which I agree. But because of the sensitive nature of the last month, the Gaza massacre, and because Mr. Makow is a popular anti-Zionist researcher, I felt it incumbent upon me to call out what I see as the Zionist subversion of his website.

On August 9, Makow published an article by Chris Glover entitled Is Israeli Aggression Based on End Times Prophesy? A quick search turned up nothing about the author, so there is little we can go on about the author’s motives other than what he has written. The article argues that despite the “satanic assault on Gaza”, it’s all going according to Bible prophecy and the media’s heavy focus on Gaza is hastening worldwide indignation against Israel, which the Bible supposedly said would happen in the “end times.”

Glover sets the tone early in the article for his propaganda with,

According to the Bible and the Book of Revelations, all the nations of the world will turn against Israel during the end times.

This is the typical premillennial-dispensationalist heresy of futurism—the myths of which I dispel in The Jewish command to deceive Christians about Bible prophecy (I asked Mr. Makow to republish this article at his website in response to Glover’s piece, but there has been no action on it at this time). Firstly, it makes the profound error of assuming that today’s Israel constitutes the Israel spoken of in the Bible and that God has any use for the physical nation of Israel as it was over 2,000 years ago. Furthermore, to support this heretical contrivance, the author makes a weak argument for what he perceives as the increased media attention on the Gaza massacre. Frankly, the media has under-reported the matter and, in the case of American media, portrayed Gaza as the villain. But that doesn’t matter to Glover. He must stretch the truth in order to support his remaining arguments. And any truths Glover tells, like that the Mossad-CIA alliance is behind the ISIS-ISIL threat, is overshadowed by his eschatological confusion.

After Glover has sucked the reader in with talk of false flags in the Middle East and Ukraine, which are mostly true, he finally lays down another heretical bombshell.

He will have a covenant with Israel and crush its enemies. But Israel must be hated by the nations in order for this to happen. Is this what the mainstream media is playing into at the current time?

Another typical futurist lie based on a misinterpretation of the Book of Daniel, Chapter 9, verse 26-27, where it’s supposedly talking about an anti-Christ figure making a seven-year peace treaty with Israel and it’s Islamic neighbours. In reality, this portion of Daniel is talking about Jesus confirming the New Covenant with all who would believe. The time period in which Jesus was prophesied to confirm this was seven years—the final week of Daniel’s Seventy Weeks.

Makow, or Glover, introduce the article with a couple of passages from the Old Testament:

Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup, one that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured. And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it.

—Zechariah 12:2-3

The Orthodox Christian interpretation of these two passages is that they were fulfilled in 70 A.D., when Rome—an empire of many nations, the world as such—encompassed Jerusalem with a siege, slaughtered one million Jews (according to Josephus), looted and burnt the Temple, and left Jerusalem utterly desolate, as Jesus said would happen.

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate : and I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. —Luke 13:35

This effectively and permanently ended the Jewish age of history. Any chance for the Jews to receive salvation now lies with their acceptance of Christ. Israel as a nation is now no longer needed, as the bigger picture, as was intended from the beginning, is that all peoples, from all nations would come to the truth.

The only sense in the “world turning against Israel” is with respect to the Church, which is the true Israel of God. That certainly is and will continue to happen, which will hasten the real end times. And Israel, as we know it, will likely not even exist in the end times, although Jerusalem will likely by the capital of some New Age one-world government. But what Glover is advancing is fundamentally Zionist, despite his seeming distaste with “Zionist-Kabbalists”.

 

Hamas rocketeers are Israeli Shin Bet

The following is a semi-satirical video produced by freedom fighter Brendon O’Connell several years ago before his imprisonment. It is still very relevant. It demonstrates how Hamas, which was created by Israel, is no friend to the Palestinians and is, in fact, a controlled opposition caper working for Israel in order to give the Israelis the pretext to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians. It also keeps rank-and-file Jews in obedience through fear. It’s a classic false flag deception.

 

Remember what former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky revealed in the early 1990s:

Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.

—Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception – pg. 197

For those not familiar with how the Zionist terrorist network in Israeli is structured, Ostrovsky gives the following illustration in By Way of Deception (1990):

Structure

Note: Shin Bet is now Shaback, which is basically like the FBI. However, this information is likely slightly outdated, as Ostrovsky’s books were published in the early 1990s. The Mossad (like America’s CIA) is Israel’s crown assassination Golem.