Shill Steve Pieczenik blames West for Epstein sex ring

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 16, 2019 Anno Domini

Why does Steve Pieczenik endorse the Soviet narrative of things by blaming the West for the Epstein sex ring and the deep state?

Pieczenik, a Cuban born with a Russian-Jewish mother, does blames Israel, too, but within the context that Israel is a Western creation—which is exactly the narrative that the Soviet’s Operation SIG invented as a tactic to undermine the West. 

In truth, Israel is a Soviet creation, but Pieczenik says nothing about this, perhaps because he is an asset of the FSB (formerly KGB), Russia’s secret service. Keep in mind that the U.S. State Department, at which Pieczenik was formerly employed under then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, has been the U.S. government body most infiltrated by the KGB. Even the CIA, at times, has been at odds with it over its Soviet leanings (author Charlotte Iserbyt has well documented the State Department’s Soviet takeover). Pieczenik has also been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and seems to be part of the old Soviet-controlled neocon clique, having worked under both the Nixon and George W. Bush administrations.

A few years ago, I began a series of articles exposing Trump as being blackmailed by Mossad through this Maxwell/Epstein ring. Almost nobody else was making this connection, until now—except they are trying to keep Trump out of the equation. Regardless, by Part IV of my series, I was beginning to understand the perestroika deception and how this apparent Mossad blackmail ring was actually a Soviet blackmail ring (but probably using the Mossad, as the Mossad is a KGB affiliate) that may have been run by KGB/Mossad asset Robert Maxwell, father of Epstein’s madame Ghislaine. Of course, Pieczenik, nor anyone else in the alternative media, are talking about this. They are endorsing the Operation SIG version of things—twisting the facts to exonerate Putin stooge Trump and redwash for the Kremlin while Israel and the West get the blame. Classic Soviet trick. Israel goes right along with this strategy, because it knows that it serves a bigger purpose in snuffing out those pesky goyim and achieving world government.

It’s difficult to say why the establishment-controlled alternative media is finally saying what I did three years ago, although they are not linking Trump to this ring—only Epstein. Unfortunately, they are not reforming that theory to its true conclusion, which is that Trump and Epstein are part of a Soviet kompromat operation that has hijacked the political system in the United States of America…and, of course, the White House.

Pieczenik and the “alternative” media might have been given the green light to expose the Mossad link to Epstein as part of a Limited Hangout play. They may be anticipating further exposure of Russia’s involvement in 9/11 and the perestroika deception, so this may be pre-emptive propaganda to neutralize the truth and continue the ridiculous lie that Trump is an outsider draining the swamp, which now includes Epstein. This might be a good indication that the establishment plans to put Trump in for another four years.

There are probably multiple reasons for the establishment bringing Epstein down. We can only guess. One of my initial thoughts was that it was a ploy by Soviet Israel to protect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud’s rule of Israel on behalf of the Kremlin, as Bibi’s biggest competition for the Knesset is former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who is deeply connected to Epstein. Barak is no Likudnik and apparently poses some kind of threat to the Soviet agenda for Israel, so it’s paramount to keep the scandal-ridden Netanyahu in power, or at least Likud.

Piezcenik is telling half truths, but half truths are necessary for Limited Hangouts. Be wise as serpents and harmless as doves!

Technocracy critic won’t finger true culprits behind it

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 17, 2018 Anno Domini

Apparently Kremlin state media RT decided anti technocrat Patrick Wood was so little a threat that they decided to give him a voice. And why shouldn’t they? For, Wood blames technocracy and the New World Order on the West and shadowy vague groups. Russia and Israel must be innocent, according to Wood.

Members of the shadowy Trilateral Commission are solely responsible for terrorizing the world with their green-washed sustainable development, transhumanist, technocratic utopian pipe dream.

That’s what author Patrick Wood, one of the most outspoken critics of technocracy, claims in his 2015 book Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.

“Technocracy is being sponsored and orchestrated by a global elite led by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Trilateral Commission,” Wood says. (pg. xiii.)

While Wood does a fairly good job illustrating the effects of this globalist agenda in his 274-page book, he fails to provide the key element of motive for the Trilaterals’ multi-generational push for global technocratic communitarianism. What motivates this group? Around which force do they rally? The same could be asked about the other two groups oft targeted by vague conspiracy researchers—Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Wood attempts to provide some motive by using Senator Barry Goldwater’s explanation of Trilateral objectives.

“The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, co-ordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centres of power—political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical.”

Wood fails to identify the one group that has sought these very objectives for over 2,000 years, the one group with more motive and technological know-how than the Trilateral Commission. Crypto-Soviet Russia and China, their progeny Israel, and international usurers are the Jewish revolutionary group lurking behind it all, with the freemasons at their side.

Of course, Jews are overrepresented on the membership lists of all three organizations: Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, and the CFR. It is, however, more difficult to assess the number of freemasons comprising membership; although, one can be certain that their numbers are also overrepresented. Wood employs inconsistent logic when he points out the overrepresentation of Trilateral members among the technocracy movement but then ignores the Jewish overrepresentation on the Trilateral Commission (and Bilderberg and CFR). On page 58, Wood makes the point that Trilaterals dominate the U.S. Federal Reserve—an absurd observation given that the Fed is an undeniable Jewish scheme.

Wood sources the foundation of technocracy—the driving “scientific” ideology behind the New World Order and its vision for world government—in the Enlightenment’s positivism movement, scientism, progressivism, Darwinism, fascism, socialism, and, finally, Technocracy Inc., through men like Henry Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte, Thorstein Veblen, and Howard Scott. Even though Judeo-masonic kabbalism lurks behind all of these movements, Wood can’t seem to make the obvious connection. 

Astonishingly, Technocracy Inc.’s 1934 study course foresaw back then what came to be realized in the last decade as the “smart grid” and “internet of things”, complete with “continuous 24 hour-per-day total net conversion of energy” thanks to such devices as harmful microwave-emitting “smart meters”, which are now on almost every home and business in the developed world. The plan would also involve a complete transformation of the monetary system—away from being pegged to gold or oil and, instead, towards energy proxies such as carbon. This has all been made possible by the United Nations and its Agenda for the 21st century (Agenda 21).


An alliance of Israeli, Russian, and Chinese tech firms are entrenched in the worldwide smart grid system, thanks in large part to stealing much of the technology from the West, and are setting up their new Silk Road to global governance.

The strength of Wood’s Technocracy Rising lies in his knowledge of the total-surveillance smart grid and the greenwashing that must accompany it. And while it is good that Woods is bringing awareness to this extremely important subject, he does a disservice to the world by omitting the true culprits behind it and their dark objective for mankind.

The real goal of technocracy is the “olam ha ba” or “world to come”, in which Jews, finally, will be recognized globally as the master race, tasked with the enlightenment (enslavement) of gentiles and lordship over all the universe through techno-based communism, similar to that established in the fictional yet prescient 1984 work by Orwell. Collectively, they will act as the messiah figure, using the merging of man and machine to achieve, they believe, what Christ did when He defeated death at the Holy Cross—immortality.

Alex Jones’ Jewish handler at Emmis promotes Hicks meme

Kosher Hicks-Jones meme

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 1, 2014 Anno Domini

Texas Monthly, the magazine that last week published an article hyping the conspiracy theory that Alex Jones is really deceased comedian Bill Hicks, is owned by Emmis Communications, which broadcasts the Alex Jones show through KLBJ.

In my article last week, I suggested that Alex Jones and his Zionist handlers were the ones behind this utterly ridiculous meme as a way of deflecting attention off of legitimate criticism of Alex Jones, namely that he is a Zionist gatekeeper, and to discredit Jones’ legitimate critics. Now, it looks more and more to be the case.

Emmis Communications CEO Jeffrey Smulyan

Emmis Communications CEO Jeffrey Smulyan

emmis communications logoTexas Monthly owned by same Zionist media racket that syndicates Infowars
Texas Monthly, based in the hometown of Alex Jones and Israeli Mossad front Stratfor, is owned by Emmis (“Emmis” is Hebrew for “truth) Communications, a media conglomerate which broadcasts Austin’s News Radio KLBJ. Alex Jones basically got his break on KLBJ in the 1990s and continues to syndicate The Alex Jones Show through it. Emmis is owned and operated by Jeffrey H. Smulyan, the winner of the Jewish National Fund’s Tree of Life Award. Smulyan is likely at least a sayan, which is a civilian helper of the Mossad who can help the organization circumvent obstacles to covert operations.

With Texas Monthly being part of the Emmis/Infowars empire, it is impossible that they would have published the Jones-Hicks story as a legitimate news story. It can only have been published to further perpetuate the meme, which is now circulating widely on the net by both paid shills and average people who have fallen for the meme as credible.

Emmis Communications tied to Stratfor and Koch Brothers
One of the major reasons for Jones to promote the Hicks meme is to cloud over the revelations about his Stratfor connections. And it just so happens that Emmis Communications also has ties with Stratfor. Wikileaks’ release of Stratfor emails shows Texas Monthly associate editor John Borders being invited for drinks with a Stratfor employee. In fact, Texas Monthly maintained regular contact with Stratfor, apparently in more than just a professional capacity. If you search the emails, you can see all kinds of exchanges.

Emmis Communications’ executive vice president and general counsel J. Scott Enright sits on the board of directors for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, which appears to be one of many Koch Brothers-funded ultra capitalist lobbies. Smulyan chaired the Koch-funded 2001 Democratic Leadership Council in Indianapolis, Indiana, Smulyan’s hometown. Some believe Alex Jones is financed by the Koch Brothers. This isn’t far fetched when you consider that his theories on economics and social structures align perfectly with that put forward by the Kochs and their front groups. Jones is also openly a Tea Party/Libertarian movement supporter, which is a creation of the Kochs. Jones tries to pawn off the Koch’s predatory system as “free market,” but there is nothing free about it. It’s the same Judeo-usurist system of the exploitation of labour. Jones is quick to call out Leftwing gatekeeper George Soros, but whom does he call out on the Right? It’s mysteriously absent in his critique of the political spectrum. Could it be because it’s the Kochs, by whom he is financed?