High taxation and preparation for the Communist world state

By Rev. Denis Fahey
Excerpted from Rulers of Russia (1940), pgs. 90-92

There is, moreover, another aspect of the question. The crush­ing burden of taxation due to the payment of interest on debt is utilised as means for the preparation of Communism or of the Semi-Communist State advocated by P.E.P. Let us first hear Arthur Kitson on the burden of debt and then, some Socialist authorities on the end to which taxation is being directed.

The Builders’ Journal (April, 1939) quotes the following pas­ sage from Arthur Kitson’s writings: “Our National Debt on March 31st, 1919, was £7,434,949,429. From 1920 to 1933 inclu­ sive there has been paid towards the redemption of the National Debt £4,104,843,063. During the same period there has been paid in interest charges on the debt £4,288,925,186. . . . In spite of this, our National Debt on December 31st, 1933 (including our debt to the U.S.A.), was £7,947,000,000, being £512,000,000 morethan the original debt of March 31st, 1919! In other words, the nation has paid on account of the debt and itnerest charges the sum of £868,000,000 more than the original debt of March 31st, 1919, without reducing the original debt by one shilling!” Money- lending to nations seems to be even more lucrative than lending to individuals! Mr. Kitson, however, in The Bankers’ Conspir­ acy, shows that matters were still worse than these figures indi­ cate. The Cunliffe Currency Committee’s Report, issued in August, 1918, recommended the restoration of the gold-standard at the pre-War parity “without delay.” In The Bankers’ Con­ spiracy, p. 92, we read: “In advising the restoration of the gold- standard they are advising the Government to increase the Na­ tional Debt and so add to the burden of taxation which the British public will have to bear. At present our National Debt approxi­ mates to £8,000,000,000! But what are these pounds and with what were they subscribed? The Committee must know that the War Loans were subscribed in ‘cheap’ pounds, approximating in value to only one-half of the pre-War pounds. Hence our War debt, expressed in pre-War pounds, would be less than £4,000,000,000! By restoring the gold-standard, the public debt would therefore be doubled and become £8,000,000,000 at pre-war value!Hence every taxpayer would be compelled to pay twice the amount of taxes in his products and services by reason of the Commit­ tee’s recommendations. Very nice for the money-lenders and war- loan subscribers, but rather hard on the wealth producers and taxpayers! . . . The money-lenders’ code of morals—which the Committee apparently endorses—is that, whilst it is very wicked for debtors to defraud their creditors, creditors are quite justified in robbing their debtors. This seems to be the moral basis of the gold-standard.” It may be well to add that Mr. Winston Churchill restored the gold-standard in 1925.

On the other hand, “this high-taxing, high-spending policy is laid down in innumerable Socialist handbooks as an essential pre­ liminary to the imposition of full Socialism. Private enterprise is to be so crushed with burdens of every sort that it is glad to throw in the sponge and quit. . . . Taxation is the chief means/ says Britain’s Socialist Fabian Society in its Tract No. 127, add­ ing that ‘to the Socialist, the best of governments is that which spends the most.’ Similarly emphatic was a leading American exponent of Socialism, the late Morris Hillquit (a Jew whose real name was Misca Hilkowicz), who pointed out in his Socialism Summed Up (1913) that high taxes, shorter hours, and shorter week, freedom to strike, etc., the owners of businesses could be reduced to the point of being glad to be taken over by the State. Another eminent Jewish Socialist, Professor Laski, of the Lon­ don School of Economics, is equally strong on ‘the weapon of taxation’ . . . Mr. George Bernard Shaw, eminent British Social­ ist, puts the bedrock idea of the whole business very bluntly in the British Labour Monthly of October, 1921. He said: ‘Com­ pulsory labour, with death as the final penalty, is the keystone of Socialism.’ . . . In a fully Socialised state, opposition to the ruling clique must from the force of circumstances take the form of underground conspiracy, working secretly until it is strong enough for an open test of strength. Against this danger the ruling clique in turn must protect itself with a gigantic spy serv­ ice. . . . Russia’s gigantic spy service and perpetual ‘liquidations’ of suspected oppositionists are no accidental features. They are inherent in full Socialism. As to how they work out in practice a former Bolshevik Commissar of Justice named Steinberg gave the following description in the New York Times of February 23rd, 1930: ‘On the one side, we have intoxication with power and a realisation that anything done by him who wields power will go unpunished; and, on the other, fear, depression, silent hatred and sycophancy; the rise of two classes, masters and slaves. In

turn the relations among the suspects become themselves per­ verted. In the struggle to win the favour of the authorities, treachery assumes appalling dimensions. All become slaves with respect to the government, and wolves with respect to one another.’ The fatal defect of Socialism is its utter incompatibility with respect for personality. , . . Human freedom is drowned in an ocean of materialism. , . * The Marxian class-war is intended solely to set the Christians at one another’s throats. . , . The whole trend of Socialism is to deprive Christians of their prop­ erty and to reduce them to a sub-human, animal status. It puts them in the position the Talmud says it is their destiny to occupy. Finance-Capitalism began the work. Socialism completes it.”1

Notes:

  1. A. N. Field in Examiner, May. 1939.

The Perestroika Deception: Behind the Mask – part I

Putin is a proven fraud and communist, Russia and China in final preparations for military conquest of the West

Part II

By ‘Child of the Immaculata’ Apocalypse 12:17
July 7, 2019 Anno Domini

A truly peaceful nation does not speak and act in warrior terms. Although the East expends much effort in pretence of virtue, in script of the long-range communist deception strategy or ‘Perestroika Deception’, as revealed (with a predictive success of 94%) by Soviet defector Mr Anatoliy Golitysn (1), the mask slips. This is unavoidable, because as Our Blessed Lord said in Divine wisdom:

“For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh……….By their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 12:34-35 & 7:16)

Accordingly, Putin in clearly presaged delectation of Western conquest and the ravages of war, told Western journalists in 2008 that their wives should learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup’:

“He told Western observers who refused to monitor the forthcoming election, widely seen as a sham, that they should ‘
rather teach their own wives how to cook cabbage soup.’ (2)
In 2016, he revealed his true communist credentials, in declaring his like of communist and socialist doctrine:

‘You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,’ Putin said, referring to the KGB ‘
I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity’ he said. “I liked communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”(3)
 
Also in 2016, Putin made public evangelisation illegal.(4) Mr. Hannu Haukka, President of Great Commission Media Ministries, said, “This new situation resembles the Soviet Union in 1929. At that time, confession of faith was permitted only in church.”

And in 2018, in further affirmation that his apparent ‘Christianity’ is totally fake (5), he compared the mausoleum of Lenin with a Christian relic: “Putin went further by comparing the Communists’ attitude to the Bolshevik leader Lenin to the veneration of saints in Christianity. ‘Look, Lenin was put in a mausoleum.How is this different from the relics of saints for Orthodox Christians and just for Christians?”(6)

Putin’s words were music to the ears of Communist Party members. ‘I think these words of the president very effectively and reasonably smooth out the acute angles around the theme of the mausoleum’, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Ivan Melnikov said on Sunday, as cited by Interfax.

Earlier this year, Gennadiy Zyuganov, the head of the Russian Communist Party, said Putin had promised him that as long as he remains president, Lenin’s body would remain in the mausoleum in Red Square.

“As long as I sit here, there will be no barbarism in Red Square’ the Communist chief quoted Putin as saying at a conference with Russian party leaders.”

The fundamental identity of communism is hatred of God, externalised in violence, destruction, death and enslavement of men. As Marx said in excerpt of his poems:

I have power within my youthful arms
To clench and crush you with tempestuous force.
See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me.
 
If there is a something which devours, 
I’ll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins.
The world which bulks between me and the abyss,
I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly,
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action,

My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

 
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.(7) 

In his annual Presidential address on 1st March 2018, Putin displayed aggressive flex of Russian (ie. Soviet) ‘tempestuous force’ and ‘fire and action’. He said, ‘It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen to us now!”

For almost an hour in this speech, we see a peacock show of weaponry (from 1 hr 15 m 15 s). Note also that the delivery aircraft for his new ‘dagger’ missile system has the Soviet 5 pointed red-star on the tail-fin! (1 hr 38 m 21 s) And of course, his speech was inter-laced with the usual anti-Western propaganda and characterisation of the US especially, as aggressor.


The communist show of military might was the mark of the Soviets, before they implemented the ‘Perestroika Deception’. And as we see in their ‘victory day’ celebrations in Red Square this year, the same is true today (note the prominent hammer and sickle emblem in the lead photo of this article). Watch the a 17 minute video in reference (8). The fundamental to the whole parade was simply virulent military power.

What about Russia’s ally China? We see here  Karl Marx’s 200th birthday as celebrated in 2018 by the Chinese regime. In the forefront President Xi, who as with Gorbachev, has been cast in his role in deceit of his ‘avuncular’ appearance.

In January 2018, they conducted an ostentatious exercise in display of their military strength. (9) Ominously, Xi stated that the military should:
“create an elite and powerful force that is always ready for the fight, capable of combat and sure to win in order to fulfil the tasks bestowed by the Partyand not to fear death.”

Anatoliy Golitysn warned that alliance between Russia and China, is the final step before communist confrontation of the West:

‘Before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favour. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet “reconciliation.” The element of apparent duality in Soviet and Chinese policies will disappear. The hitherto concealed coordination between them will become visible and predominant. The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of one clenched fist to provide the foundation and driving force of a world communist federation. At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable.(10)

It is clear we have reached this stage!

September 2018

‘Russia has launched what it has called its largest ever military drills, with hundreds of thousands of troops joining Chinese soldiers.

Taking part in the drills are around 300,000 Russian soldiers, 36,000 military vehicles, 80 ships and 1,000 aircraft, helicopters and drones, as well as 3,500 Chinese troops.’ (10)

June 2019

‘Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping. Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin praised their countries’ ties during talks at the Kremlin, as Russia and China seek to shore up cooperation amid shared tensions with the United States.’President Putin is for me a best friend.’ Xi told journalists.’ (11)

Conclusion:

For those hood-winked that Putin is a virtuous Christian, then this falsehood is annulled in evidence above. His pretence of apparent ‘Christianity’ is faked to deceive the West, concomitant with the strategy to denigrate the West as evil and exalt the East in virtue, in self-justification for their pending attack on the West. Note there was no mention of God in his 2018 Presidential address. Only a display of hard military power for his communist audience, who in some cases exhibited frissons of exultation as Putin unveiled the new power of the Soviet fist. This is their first measure of national pride!

The ‘East good/West bad’ propaganda strategy has been revealed by Putin’s close confidante Alexander Dugin (12) of whom we should note, was condemned by the Russian Orthodox Church as a disciple of the satanist Aleister Crowley (12a) It has also been admitted by Margarita Simonyan, who is the the head of the media propaganda organ RT (13).

The truth of Putin is exposed by Sacred Scripture:

“For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)

Indeed, Putin as chief administrator of the ‘Perestroika Deception’, stands ready to destroy 5000 years of Western civilisation and take billions of lives. He is an anti-christ of the first grade and an acolyte of the communist ‘saint’ Lenin. As the Hungarian communist Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner (d. 1944) wrote in a poem; (14) THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN! LENIN! Gorbachev stated in a speech on the 15th November 1989 – SIX DAYS AFTER THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL; (15)

“We are for Lenin who is alive!” In order to achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society.

Well, the new society they intend is technocratic, communist enslavement for the entire world!

As Anatoliy Golitsyn said: ‘In the new worldwide communist federation the present different brands of communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism.’

So help us God!

In part 2, we will examine the East’s strategy of conquest for the West. Again, please distribute this information and in personal sacrifice of your reputation to a blinded world, if needs be. God gives much grace for such sacrifice (Mark 3:21).

 

References:

1)  Soviet analyst Mr Christopher Story (RIP) – video expounding Soviet multi-decade communist deception strategy.

‘The Perestroika Deception’ by Mr Anatoliy Golitsyn.

https://www.chinhnghia.com/GOLITSYN(Anatoliy)-Perestroika_Deception_(1998).pdf

2) Putin tells Western wives to learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup.’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578802/Vladimir-Putins-nuclear-threat-to-the-West.html

3) Putin still likes communist and socialist ideas very much.

https://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

4) Putin signs law banning evangelism outside of churches.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/thousands-fasting-after-russian-president-putin-signs-law-banning-evangelism-outside-of-churches.html

5) Article Fitzpatrick Informer – Putin is a fake christian.

https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/sanhedrin-addresses-putin-as-jewish-king/

6) Putin compares mausoleum of Lenin with a christian relic.

https://www.rt.com/news/415883-putin-communist-ideology-christianity/

https://www.rt.com/russia/398319-putin-promised-to-keep-lenin/

7) Poetry of Karl Marx

https://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/marx.htm

8) Soviet ‘Victory Day’ parade 2019 – note at 10 m 49s, a young girl waving a Soviet flag and with a hammer and sickle brooch on her hat!

9) China war preparations.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2018/jan/04/xi-jinping-chinese-army-to-strengthen-war-preparedness-video

10) Anatoliy Golitysin – Russia/China ‘one-clenched fist’ strategy.

The Clenched Fist—Revisiting Golitsyn’s Predictions

11) Russia conducts largest ever military exercise with China.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/11/russia-largest-ever-military-exercise-300000-soldiers-china

11) Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping.

12) Alexander Dugin – ‘to gain victory over the US in the coming ‘Great War’ is to use its vast media operations and assets in the alternative media to portray America as irredeemably evil.’

Dugin’s Published Plan to Destroy the West

12a) Dugin recites praises to satan from text of satanist Aleister Crowley.

13) RT’s chief editor, Margarita Simonyan, has said that the network she manages is like ‘a defence ministry’ and capable of ‘conducting information war against the whole Western world.’

RT Forces Employees to 20 years of Silence

14) Communist, freemason and Jew Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner – THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN ! LENIN!

https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter4.html

15) Gorbachev speech – ‘We are for a Lenin who is alive!’

https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/category/forward-not-back/

The ‘August coup’ hoax that legitimized the fake collapse of communism

Moscow. The 19th of August 1991. Boris Yeltsin addresses people from the top of a tank. Photo TASS / Valentin Kuzmin; Alexander Chumichev (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
June 22, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 137-144 (1998)

THE FAKE ‘AUGUST COUP’ AND ITS CALCULATED FAILURE

A deliberately engineered ‘Break with the Past’

Who called the shots in the USSR before the ‘coup’ and who introduced the ‘reforms’? Gorbachev and his ‘liberals’? NO, the Party and its strategists.

Who is calling the shots now and who proposed the coup to replace Gorbachev? The ‘hardliners’, the Minister of Defence and the Chief of the KGB? NO, the Party and its strategists.

The ‘coup’ was proposed in accordance with the requirements of the Soviet strategy of convergence leading to eventual World Government. This strategy and its moves, like the present Soviet ‘coup’, can only be understood in the light of the theories of one of the principal Soviet agents of influence, namely Sakharov, and his timetable for convergence. According to Sakharov, during the first phase the Leninist realists (i.e. Gorbachev and other ‘liberals’) will expand and strengthen ‘democracy’ and economic reform in the USSR and other socialist countries.

As we know, this has already happened.

According to Sakharov, in the second phase the pressure exerted by the Soviet example and by the internal progressive forces would lead to the victory of the Leftist Reformist Wing (the Soviet term for American liberals) which would begin to implement a programme of collaboration and convergence with the USSR on a worldwide scale, entailing changes in the structure of ownership. According to Sakharov, this phase would include an expanded role for the intelligentsia and an attack on the forces of racism and militarism.

We had reached this phase before the war with Iraq. In the assessment of the Soviet strategists, the US victory over Iraq adversely affected the political balance in the United States. In their view, the victory weakened and demoralised the liberals (or Leftist Reformists) and strengthened the centrist and conservative forces and the US military. This disturbed Soviet plans to carry out their strategy of convergence.

They saw that their main political allies in achieving convergence with the United States had been weakened. Accordingly they engineered this strategic ‘coup’ to reverse and improve the political fortunes of their American allies. Seen in strategic terms, the main purpose of Gorbachev’s ‘dismissal’ is further to confuse American opinion and to alter the political landscape in the United States so as to accelerate the progress of the Soviet strategy and to put it back on the rails.

This strategy is a deliberate and coordinated walk towards ultimate victory by advancing first the left leg of action by ‘liberals’, then the right leg of action by ‘hardliners’ and then once more the left leg of action by ‘liberals’. The ‘dismissal’ of Gorbachev is temporary. In earlier Memoranda I predicted a calculated ‘resignation’ by Gorbachev and his eventual return to power.

The ‘coup’ confirms this prediction. According to my analysis, the ‘coup’ is aimed at intensifying American anxieties over the fate of Gorbachev and the other ‘liberals’ and ‘reformists’ in the USSR like Shevardnadze. When these concerns reach their peak, the Soviet strategists’ next move can be expected. They will return Gor- bachev and other ‘liberals’ to power through a campaign of strikes and demonstra- tions organised by the Party.

As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev’s return and the strengthening of the ‘reformists’ in the USSR will also strengthen the American liberals, revive their fortunes and help them win future elections – leading eventually to the convergence of the United States and the USSR. In short, Gorbachev’s return will be a repetition of the device of the suppression of Solidarity in Poland, followed by its victory.

The main purpose of the ‘coup’ is to reverse an unfavourable situation for potential Soviet allies in the United States and to create favourable conditions for the implementation of the convergence strategy. The second objective is to secure the non-violent creation of the new Soviet Federation of Republics. The third objective is to provide any potential adventurers there may be in the Soviet military with a lesson and thereby to eliminate any possibility of a genuine coup in the future.

Moscow, August 20, 1991. Russian President Boris Yeltsin makes communist first salute and speaks at a rally held in support of “democracy”. (Photo by: Sovfoto/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SOVIET ‘COUP’

The point has already been made that Gorbachev will be returned to power at the moment when it best serves the Soviet strategy of convergence. Depending on the circumstances prevailing at the appropriate time, he could be returned to power through an election, after a period of other activities .

His alleged removal from power and house arrest are deliberate devices to build up his popularity before such an election. Meanwhile one can expect that the Soviet strategists intend to replace him or to add to his team another ace card, the ‘anti-Communist’ (but, like Gorbachev, protege of Andropov) Boris Yeltsin, leader of the Russian Republic. As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev has exhausted the influence he exerted on their behalf in the West. He was unable to extract more econ- omic aid at the London Summit Meeting and his advice concerning a diplomatic solution to the conflict with Iraq was ignored by President Bush. It is the strategists’ belief that Boris Yeltsin will give greater credibility in the West to Soviet economic and political ‘reform’. He will be in a better position to exploit his influence to extract additional economic aid from the West and, in particular, to obtain from the West a commitment to a new Marshall Plan for Russia.

A Marshall Plan for Russia is one of the primary interim objectives of the Soviet strategists and one that Gorbachev failed to achieve. The strategists expect that Yeltsin will be able to exert greater influence in diplomatic, economic and political relationships and will receive more cooperation in the international arena particularly in the Middle East and at the United Nations. One can expect that the Soviet strategists will come forward with fresh initiatives combined with deliberate provo- cations and crises in order to enhance the role of the United Nations.

They will do this because they regard the United Nations as a stepping stone to a future World Government The Soviet political game and the Soviets’ trickery in ‘manipulating’ politicians like Gorbachev and Y eltsin for W estern public consumption demand more imagination and a better grasp of these machinations from the Bush Administration. For example, to proceed with the appointment of Mr Robert Strauss as the new Ambassador in Moscow is a great mistake because the appointment is being made at a time when the Soviet strategists are deliberately undermining the credit and prestige President Bush gained from his dealings with Gorbachev. They are undercutting the President in favour of their political allies – namely, the American liberals. Nowadays the situation is more serious than it was after the Second World War. President Truman woke up to the nature of Stalin’s mentality, his deeds and his intentions. The Bush Administration, by contrast, has no understanding of Soviet strategy and its ultimate, aggressive, strategic designs against the United States.

Given this situation and the Soviet ‘game plan’, the President, instead of appointing a politician/businessman like Robert Strauss as American Ambassador in Moscow, should consider appointing someone like Richard Helms or General Vernon Walters – that is to say, a professional man and an intelligence expert who might see through the Soviet game plan and help the Administration as General Bedell Smith helped President Truman in 1947.

THE AUTHOR’S ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CALCULATED SOVIET ‘COUP’ AND OF ITS CALCULATED ‘FAILURE’

According to my assessment, the Soviet ‘coup’ and its ‘failure’ constituted a grandiose display of deception – a provocation. The ‘ineptitude’ of the participants in the ‘coup’ and the ‘failure’ of it were skilfully planned and executed. The main argument in support of this assessment is that the Soviet military, the KGB, the Party and leading media figures apparently had neither the skill to launch a successful coup nor the guts to crush resistance to it. This is news indeed!

Oleg Kalugin, former KGB general, giving a speech after the Russian government forces suppressed the fake August Coup – an attempt by supposed hard-line members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) to take control of the country. Moscow, Russia, on August 20, 1991. (Photo by Wojtek Laski/Getty Images)

Facing a real crisis in Hungary in 1956, the same forces displayed exceptional skill, knowhow and determination in crushing a genuine revolt. Knowledge of the Soviet mentality and of Moscow’s record of ruthless action has convinced this analyst that the Soviet military, the Party and the leaders of the media all have the skill, the will and the courage to crush genuine resistance and opposition. They did not display them on this occasion because the abortive ‘coup’ was carried out in accor- dance with Party instructions; and it was the Party and the Komsomol themselves which organised the alleged resistance to it.

The real participants both in the ‘coup’ and in the ‘failure’ were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party offi- cials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interests of the Party’s strategy and under the guidance of its strategists. The calculated nature of the ‘coup’ and its timing show that it was staged by the Russian, President Yeltsin, to save the essence of the Union at the time of transition to a new form of federation.

The abortive ‘coup’ and the ‘resistance’ to it were carefully calculated displays intended primarily for the West. This explains why Western media contacts with Moscow were not curtailed. On the contrary, the big guns of the Soviet media like Vitaliy Korotich and representatives of the Arbatov Institute were on hand both in Moscow and in the United States to ‘help’ the Western media with their interpretation of developments in the USSR. The episode shows how well Soviet strategists like Arbatov and his experts on the American media have mastered the art of projecting such displays for consumption by the American media, and throughout the West.

The Soviet strategists sought to underline for the West the dramatic ineptitude of the ‘coup’ and the spectacular courage and resistance displayed by the new ‘Russian democrats’ and their leader Yeltsin in ‘defending’ the Soviet Parliament – their symbolic equivalent of ‘The White House’. The main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratisation is genuine, that it has the support of the people and that it is working. They want to convince the West that Western investment in the USSR will pay dividends.

They expect that the West will now respond with a new Marshall Plan which will bring Western technology flooding in to the Soviet Union, promoting joint ven- tures and stimulating a restructuring of the Soviet economy along the lines of the revival of the German and Japanese economies after the Second World War.

Internally, one objective is to influence the Soviet population towards acceptance of the new Party-controlled ‘democracy’ as a real power and to develop the strength and maturity of the new ‘democratic’ structure and the popularity of its leaders, especially Yeltsin. Another objective is to exploit this staged ‘coup’ in order to reorganise and ‘reform’ the Soviet bureaucracy, the military, the intelligence and counter-intelligence organisations and the diplomatic service, and to give them a new ‘democratic’ image.

The Soviet strategists realise that only with such a new image, implying a ‘Break with the Past’ and severance from Communism, can these organisations be converted into effective weapons for convergence with their counterparts in the United States. A further internal objective is to emphasise the change in the system by means of the spectacular, televised but calculated removal of old Communist symbols like the monuments to Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy, and the red banners.

These changes do not represent a genuine and sincere repudiation of Soviet design and intentions to secure an eventual world victory. Although very spectacular, the changes are cosmetic. They demonstrate only that Arbatov and others know how to manipulate the American and other Western media through the use of powerful symbols such as the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the toppling of Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy statues and Yeltsin’s staged ‘defence’ of the Soviet ‘White House’.

If the Soviets were truly moving towards genuine democracy, and were intent on a true ‘Break with the Past’, these symbolic changes would be accompanied by the introduction and implementation of a de-communisation programme, the irrevocable (not cosmetic) prohibition of the Communist Party and Komsomol organisations at all levels throughout the USSR, and the removal of ‘former’ Party and Komsomol members from all the main seats of power including the KGB, the Soviet army and its political commissar administration, the Ministries, especially those for the Interior and Foreign Affairs, and the trade unions.

Yeltsin has allegedly banned the Communist Party in Russia. But the question should be asked: ‘Why did he forget to ban the Komsomol youth organisation?’ [Note: According to ‘The New York Times’ of 29 September 1991, the Komsomol voted to dissolve itself; its regulations were changed ‘to allow subordinate youth leagues in the Soviet Republics to succeed it’ – Author’s emphasis].

To carry conviction, the necessary purge of former Communists would have to be carried out at all levels, as was the intention with the de-nazification programme in Germany after the war. Without any such programme, present changes, however impressive, will remain cosmetic.

There are at present no means of distinguishing reliably between a genuine democrat and a former Communist in Russia. However one important criterion for judging the sincerity of the abrupt and virtually simultaneous conversion of former Communist leaders into true democrats would be a frank official statement from them that the Soviet Party and Government adopted a long-range strategy in the years 1958 to 1960, that ‘perestroika’ is the advanced phase of this strategy, and that it is to be abandoned forthwith in favour of normal, open, civilised relations. There has been no sign whatsoever of any such admission.

Further criteria for judging the sincerity of the abrupt conversion of ‘former’ Communist leaders into believers in true democracy would need to include:

  • An official admission that the ‘dissident movement’ and its leader, Sakharov, were serving the interests of that strategy under KGB control;
  • Public exposure of the main KGB agents among Soviet scientists, priests, writers and theatre and movie personalities who have been playing an active role in the KGB-controlled political ‘opposition’ – especially those like the ‘conservative’ Kochetov and the ‘liberal’ Tvardovskiy who in the 1960s engaged in a Party- and KGB-controlled debate intended to convey the false impression that Soviet society was evolving towards democracy;
  • And finally: a categorical repudiation of any strategic intention on the part of the Soviets of working towards ‘convergence’ with the United States.

The self-evident absence of any of these criteria indicates that the symbolic changes mean no more than that the strategists had reached the conclusion that the old symbols had outlived their usefulness – at least, in the Soviet Union and East- em Europe – and had to be replaced by new, more attractive, popular symbols.

Moreover these cosmetic changes are logical and were predicted earlier by this ana- lyst. The Soviets realised that convergence with the United States cannot be achieved under the old compromised symbols like Lenin, Dzerzhinskiy and others associated in the Western mind with terror, repression, exile and bloodshed. Convergence requires the introduction of new, attractive, national and ‘democratic’ symbols conveying the impression that Soviet ‘democracy’ is approaching the Western model.

No doubt these cosmetic changes, the reorganisation of the Soviet bureau- cracy and the new, more enigmatic status of its leaders like Yeltsin will be seen by the West as a deepening of the process of Soviet’ reform’, offering new opportunities for Western policy. But the West’s main weakness remains unchanged: it cannot grasp the fact that it is facing an acceleration in the unfolding of Soviet convergence strategy which is intended to procure the subservience of the West to Moscow under an ultimate Communist World Government.

The Machiavellian boldness and imagination displayed by the Soviet strategists through their staged ‘coup’ and its preordained defeat are alarming. No doubt these manoeuvres will be followed not only by faked suicides, but also by staged trials of the alleged leaders of the ‘coup’. These leaders may well be sentenced to apparent prison terms. But in fact they will live in comfortable retirement in resort areas like the Crimea and the Caucasus. Russia is a big country and places can be found for them to hide.

The ‘coup’ and its ‘defeat’ show that the Soviets will go to any lengths in pur- suit of their convergence strategy. This reminds me of remarks by Vladimir Zhenikhov, the former KGB Rezident in Finland, and Aleksey Novikov, another KGB officer, at the time the strategy was adopted in 1961.

Both of them had recently returned from home leave in Moscow. When I asked for the latest news from headquarters, both replied using different words but to the same effect: ‘This time the KGB are going to finish with capitalist America once and for all’. I believed them then, and I believe that what is happening now is a bad omen for Western democracy.

The other alarming aspect of the situation is Western euphoria and the uncritical acceptance of present Soviet developments at their face value. This shows how easily the West can be taken in by staged Soviet spectacles, and how justified the strategists are in believing that their ‘era of provocations’ will produce the intended results. Furthermore, Western euphoria and naivete serve only to encourage the Soviet strategists to stage new spectacles more convinced than ever that their strategic designs are realistic.

Leninist Aesopian speech

By Christopher Story
June 19, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States, pg. XXXIX (1997)

Lenin was most exacting of the language and style of agitation and propaganda. He demanded that the language of articles and books should be impeccable…. Before him, history had not known a politician who made such effective use of the spoken word in the interests of the revolutionary transformation of society’ [from ‘Lenin on Language’, Raduga Publishers, Moscow, 1983]. However, typically, Lenin did not encourage such exactitude in order to clarify matters: on the contrary, he was exacting in his use of language in order to obfuscate – and to create a means of communicating with those whom he called ‘the interested’ (the revolutionaries), while still using ordinary, everyday language, to which the Tsarist censors could hardly object. By the use of this dialectical means of communication, which contained hidden meanings, the ‘enemy’ could be charmed, deluded, misled and lied to, while the interested’ could simultaneously be instructed as required by the strategists.

Among vehicles used for the issuance of Kremlin directives, one of the most widely employed outside the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc has been ‘World Marxist Review’, in which language is used with Leninist care. Another crucial source of information on the continuing Revolution is the Russian Foreign Ministry’s journal ‘International

Affairs’, also written in Lenin’s ‘two-faced’ language, which provides detailed continuing insights into Soviet revolutionary policy, tactics, strategy and intentions: if Western analysts were aware of Lenin’s ‘special way of writing’, and were prepared to spend the necessary time reading and analysing ‘International Affairs’, they would be able to acquire Golitsyn-like expertise in interpreting events and predicting the likely course of Soviet tactics or strategy. One reason for Western blindness is ignorance about Lenin’s ‘Aesopian language’.

So the Leninists’ ‘Aesopian language’, alluded to in this work, requires some brief explanation. In the Preface to the Russian Edition of ‘Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism’ [26th April 1917], Lenin wrote: ‘I was not only forced to confine myself strictly to an exclusively theoretical, mainly economic analysis of facts, but to formulate a few necessary observations on politics with extreme caution, by hints, in that Aesopian language – in that cursed Aesopian language – to which Tsarism compelled all revolutionaries to have recourse whenever they took up their pens to write a “legal” work’ [i.e., a work which would not be censored or banned by the Tsarist authorities as illegal -Ed.]. Following this passage, Lenin appended a Note, which reads as follows: “Aesopian”, after the Greek fable writer, Aesop, was the term applied to the allusive and roundabout style adopted in “legal” publications by revolutionaries in order to evade the censorship’.

That this method of communication has been used by the Leninists ever since is obvious from the language of double-meanings used by Gorbachev, Kozyrev and other contemporary Leninists – ‘perestroika’ being the most conspicuous case in point. The Soviets encouraged the West to believe that ‘perestroika’ meant ‘restructuring’, as in ‘restructuring of the economy’; which it did. But ‘perestroika’ also meant something entirely different to ‘the interested’; and its second meaning was quite legitimate: to Gorbachev’s ‘interested’, ‘perestroika’ meant ‘re-formation’, as in ‘military formation’: so that its hidden meaning was ‘we are ‘re-forming’, in order more effectively to prevail over all who are opposed to Communism. That this was the case was made clear by Carl Bloice, the Kremlin correspondent of the CPUSA’s ‘People’s Weekly World’ [see page 62]. Citing Lenin, he wrote in May 1991 that the Soviet Leninists were engaged in ‘drawing back in order to make better preparations for a new offensive’.

Hungary’s ‘nationalist’ PM Viktor Orbán nothing but a commie plant

A fire worker controls the temporary pedestal, as activists and sympathizers of Hungarian ‘Szolidaritas’ Movement pull their ropes to break down their plastic statue of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, representing the former Soviet communist dictator Stalin, in Budapest on September 29, 2013 during their anti-government demonstration to protest against the financial and economic policy of Orban’s government. (ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 24, 2019 Anno Domini

The Soviet Trust model of using controlled opposition to trap anti-communists and conservatives is still in use today.

Look no further than Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who has successfully fooled Western (and Eastern) conservatives into believing that he and a clique of so called Eastern nationalists, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, are genuine conservatives trying to save the world from the globalists and the evil West. It seems Orban’s anti-immigration policy has been the main driver in affirming this carefully crafted ruse.

Unfortunately, Orban and other East Bloc nations’ anti-immigration policies are not about saving Europe and conservatives but about preserving stability within the Soviet Bloc nations as they reform and about pushing more migrants to Western Europe, which is the primary target of the Soviet Kalergi plan of migration destabilization. When Hungary was officially communist, under János Kádár, immigration was greatly restricted, so Orban’s policy on immigration is essentially the same as it was in Red Hungary.

No one seems to be asking how these Soviet Bloc nations with membership in the European Union are able to maintain membership whilst going against E.U. directives like unfettered immigration. The answer can only be that the Kremlin has cut a deal to keep its satellites free of the migration agenda, thus empowering the satellites while its Western European neighbours disintegrate. That or the European Union has become the victim of nuclear blackmail and has no choice but to let the Kremlin and its satellites do what they like. Of course, the E.U. is full of communist saboteurs, so whatever scenario, it’s not hard to believe.

Soviet analyst Max Moritz writes,

“Orbán’s attacks against Brussels, against George Soros, and certainly against immigration are more than just bombastic spectacle. Hungary, which formed in February 1991 together with Poland and then-Czechoslovakia, the so-called Visegrád Group, is seamlessly pursuing, like its meanwhile three good old socialist brother states (that include Slovakia), an unchanged East Bloc policy, which in the new situation is designed to make sure that these countries only benefit from their membership in the European Union.

Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban and Polish ruling party leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski, are depicted as secret communists during anti-government parade that walked through the streets of Krakow, Poland on 14 April, 2019. (Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

“Their (Hungary, Poland, etc.) behaviour during the 2015 so-called “refugee crisis” gave these four countries completely away, as they outright refused (and still refuse) to take any significant numbers of people in. In other words, they do not regard themselves as part of the E.U. or the West at all! Given the fact that this immense wave of migration (that hasn’t stopped even now) represents a clandestine Russian operation aimed at destabilising Western Europe, and Western Europe only, it becomes clear that these unchanged East-bloc countries, based on their fictitious nationalism, won’t allow these people from Africa and Asia in. After all, the migration crisis is designed to hit solely the West! And: They are, under whatever pretext, silently or not so silently leaving the EU, not formally, but factually, moving back into the same East-European communist sphere they came from!,” says Moritz.

Orban is accused of being a communist informant during the 1980s when Hungary was openly communist. It seems the Kremlin set him up in a Soviet Trust model from the beginning—bringing him to fame as a (fake) anti-Communist, which resulted in ensnaring legitimate anti-communists and conservatives and, thereby, controlling legitimate anti-communistm in the country, thus allowing the continuance of the rebranded communist regime.

“…since coming into office in Hungary’s 2010 general elections, he (Orban) has faced frequent accusations both at home and abroad of emulating the authoritarian practices he once opposed.” (Source)

Orban’s role as a fake anti-communist also appears to have helped facilitate the grand deception of the global collapse of communism in the 1990s, with Hungary being part of a carefully laid out plan to conveniently allow the world’s media to have cameras ready to roll as one regime appeared to fall after another, in successive order. Now he is the Prime Minister of the country, whose anxious populace view him as a stooge of Putin and the Kremlin. This is unsurprising, as Orban is surrounded by “former” communist advisors. Some of Orban’s critics see him as using the exact same playbook used by Kádár. Critics also accuse Poland’s Jarosław Kaczyński (pictured above as a crypto-Communist alongside Orban) of using the playbook from Communist Poland, which is similar to Kádár’s. They are similar because they come from the same source, the COMINTERN at the Kremlin.

MOSCOW, RUSSIA – JANUARY 31: Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) receives Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (C) in the Kremlin on January 31, 2013 in Moscow, Russia. Orban is on a one-day visit to Russia. (Photo by Sasha Mordovets/Getty Images)

When it became public in 2015 that Orban was part of the Soviet Trust honeypot, he was called to appear before a parliamentary national security committee—to which he refused, calling it “absurd and ridiculous”.

Orban and Hungary are not the only ones running this fake opposition Soviet Trust. The same could be said for Poland and other “former” Soviet bloc nations also blocking E.U. immigration directives. So, while these Soviet Bloc nations continue to fool Western conservatives and anti-communists alike that Russia and its satellites have reformed to capitalism and conservative values, Western Europe and America continue to cripple under the weight of Soviet destabilization measures like the Kalergi plan and cultural Marxism. Meanwhile, said Soviet Bloc nations continue to draw on European Union coffers. What a swindle!

 

Vancouver one giant Trump Tower, Soviet Chabad laundro-mansion

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 19, 2019 Anno Domini

If we take Trump Tower to mean a place where Sino-Soviet oligarchs can launder their blood-soaked cash, consider Vancouver to be the biggest.

It is one of the most Soviet-penetrated ports in the Western world: Vancouver, the gem city on Canada’s West coast—a once beautiful city now plagued with rampant drug addiction, homelessness, and massive displacement of the European-derived indigenous population, largely due to one of the most inflated housing bubbles in human history. Things are so bad in Vancouver, Vancouver’s heroin-fentanyl-riddled downtown Eastside has become infamous around the world.

Seemingly bewildered civic and national officials continue to fail to find a solution to “the Vancouver model“. But that’s because they fail to identify the root of the problem, which is now out in the open for any non-ostrich to see.

The root of the problem is the Soviet narcotics offensive, with much of Vancouver’s drugs coming from Communist China’s Golden Triangle region, and Sino-Soviet money laundering, which involves the KGB (now FSB), Chinese intelligence, and the Sino-Soviet-Semitic international organized crime syndicate, including Chabad Lubavitch. The Chabad mafia just happens to have a large presence in Vancouver, with at least half a dozen operations in the city.

The provincial government, the socialist BCNDP, has been forced to admit that money laundering is largely responsible for the city’s problem, but they won’t develop this explanation to its necessary conclusion, which is that Vancouver’s problems are by design and part of a long-range Leninist Soviet strategy to destabilize the West. Get the indigenous population, especially its youth, hooked on and killed by drugs, thereby reducing the white, Western population; flood the real-estate market with laundered Soviet cash, much of which is the proceeds from Red narco-terrorism; use the effective housing inflation to drive out the local population; and, finally, increase Chinese-Korean migration to insure against any relapse of said displacement.

This same plot is taking place in several places in the Western world. In California’s Silicon Valley, for example, the exact same thing is happening.

Instead of admitting the root of the problem, Canadian officials ignore any discussion of the matter and, instead, attempt to curb these Soviet active measures by imposing ineffective across-the-board housing taxes on foreign buyers and absentee landlords. They don’t seem to understand that this Soviet plot is not about money. The Soviets don’t care about taxes. They are willing to take loses in order to ensure the advancement of their strategies. It was the Chinese communists, after all, who greatly subsidized the cost of heroin to American soldiers during the Vietnam intervention, as an effective means of destabilizing America’s armed forced. Therefore, Canadian officials need to focus on, at the very least, banning foreign buyers all together, including identifying and stopping the many shell games that Soviet agents like to use in anonymously laundering cash through real estate.

Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou.

Many Sino-Soviet elites, like Communist-controlled Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, own estates in Vancouver’s posh mansion district Shaughnessy, where you will find some completely empty mansions. Wanzhou’s estate mysteriously seems to be in a perpetual state of renovation, like others. These are, effectively, Soviet laundro-mansions. Shaughnessy, which is located very close to the Chabad district of Vancouver, is a microcosm of the macrocosmic Soviet active measure throughout all of Vancouver, Silicon Valley, and in other places in the West. So, too, is Vancouver’s Trump Tower (Toronto, where the same housing bubble exists, also has a mobbed-up Trump Tower). Real estate seems to be the primary instrument through which gangsters and gangster-run governments, like in Marxist Russia, China, and Israel, launder their money.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a devoted Marxist  and son to suspected KGB asset and former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, has done absolutely nothing thus far. Until Canada’s elected officials grow a collective set of functioning gonads and identify the problem, this Soviet penetration is only going to deepen and wreak havoc on Canada.

JFK’s 3D chess, CIA anti-communism

Joseph Kennedy and son U.S. President John F. Kennedy.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 4, 2018 Anno Domini

Unlike Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, pretend players at the table of three-dimensional chess, Joseph P. Kennedy and his son John were truly playing the game.

A good example of this is in the brilliantly crafted public relations campaign that Papa Joseph came up with in order to trick the Jews into supporting his son as president: “Kikes for Kennedy, Nazis for Nixon”—even though Joseph and Jack had a plan to undermine Jewish power in the world. The gambit paid off, as Jack would go on to win the U.S. Presidential election in 1960, with a great deal of support from the Jewish community and the masonic establishment. Granted, the power structure was probably still nervous about what Jack would actually do.

It also seems that the civil rights movement that JFK championed was another attempt at 3D-chess; however, in retrospect, this went too far, as it contributed to the Soviet plan of demoralizing the United States—to the point that it has spawned the Cultural Marxist thought-police state we are in today. While it may have worked in the short-term for JFK, it was a huge mistake for the West in general. It also didn’t help JFK’s image to the intelligence community when he attempted to thwart anti-communist war efforts (Vietnam, Cuba, etc.). I have a difficult time seeing a tangible 3-D chess strategy in such manoeuvres and can certainly sympathize with the Western intelligence community’s perception of JFK as a communist saboteur of sorts.

While I don’t believe JFK was a secret communist trying to sabotage Western war efforts, I struggle to find clarity in much of his foreign policy. Perhaps JFK and his father saw the wars as serving as an overall drain on resources and attention—which could otherwise be diverted back to undermining Jewish power and the Rothschild war dialectic. If this could confuse an analyst in 2018, how much more could it do the same to the intelligence and military analysts of the 1960s? JFK should have committed to Vietnam and definitely a Cuba intervention (Cuba went on to serve as a major Soviet narcotics trafficking point and revolutionary bully in South America as a result of a failed Western intervention during the Bay of Pigs and Cuban missile crisis. The failure also contributed to the mess in Nicaragua, Panama, and Mexico. Vietnam is also a key player in the Soviet narcotics network.). On the other hand, perhaps America really never stood a chance in Southeast Asia and Kennedy saw this. The Rothschild war machine wanted the dialectic to continue while Kennedy wanted to end the waste of resources and lives.

Israel orchestrated the assassination of John F. Kennedy, as the late Michael Collins Piper and others have hypothesized, with the participation of Soviet-compromised Western intelligence, specifically the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. military intelligence, and, of course, other players. If anything, Israel (and probably the USSR) did a good job of leading Western intelligence into believing that their participation in the murder of Kennedy would further the anti-communist cause (keep in mind that Western intelligence had already been heavily infiltrated by the communists by this time). Kennedy was in a no-win situation. Apparently, his 3-D chess had backfired and provoked his backers to turn on him, with Russia and World Jewry the sole beneficiaries of the fallout. The assassination of Kennedy did not stop the communist subversion of the West but, instead, furthered it, primarily by dividing the West and guaranteeing Israel and Russia complete dominance in the Middle East (Kennedy apparently worked to protect the Arab countries from Judeo-Marxist subversion). After JFK’s departure from this planet, the Arab world would undergo a radical Marxist transformation that has served Israel’s interest of divide-and-conquer as well as World Jewry’s Kalergi plan of flooding the West with subsequently displaced Muslims.

The Putinists cry about how NATO supposedly has guns pointing at Russia from all sides; meanwhile, the crypto Soviet Union has satellites surrounding all of the Western powers, especially the United States. And with Great Britain now exiting the European Union, Russia now has their satellite Germany—the largest economy in Europe—as the sole inheritor of Eurasian directorship. JFK’s death allowed all of this to happen.

A response to Father Michael Ruskin regarding the Russia deception

Anti-Christian Soviet propaganda. Perhaps this rendering has dual meaning. On one hand, the Soviets portray the church as a religious snare, but on the other hand, perhaps they are crytpically telling Russians of the Soviet control of the Patriarchate of Moscow.

The following is in response to comments made by Father Michael Ruskin of Christ the Saviour Antiochian Orthodox Church of New Zealand to my open letter on the Russia deception.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 5, 2018 Anno Domini

Dear Father Michael,

Your sobering reminder about the daily battle within ourselves is without a doubt the most important battle in our day-to-day lives. The Holy Scriptures warn us that the ultimate struggle is not with flesh and blood but with things of the spirit. How correct this is.

But let us realize that communism and its subsidiaries are not merely physical and political constructs with which to enslave humans beings. They are deeply spiritual—so much so that Patriarch Tikhon died to protect his flock from its spiritual perversion, not just its physical oppressiveness. It is not called “Godless communism” without good reason. In hindsight, Tikhon was justified in moving the Church into the catacombs, as the resulting Marxist churches (permitted by Lenin and the Soviets) that sprang up in both East and West (Vatican II) would evolve and attempt to replace the true one, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Prior to its Marxist infiltration, the Vatican also issued grave warnings about the communist threat. The Eastern and Western Churches were in complete agreement on this. But where are these warnings in the new Sovietized churches? No where. They don’t exist. Communism/Marxism is no longer a threat, they have us believing.

Is Putin doing anything more than Lenin in permitting the existence of the Sergian church in Russia and its subsidiaries in the West? Where is the rebirth of authentic Orthodoxy in Russia today? Shouldn’t this be reflected in Russia’s statistics, which have sky-high abortion rates, broken families, and essentially the same problems as the “evil” West? How many Russians even know of the Catacomb Church? In truth, both Putin and Lenin are responsible for the rebirth of the orthodox church—a Soviet mongrelized church. Patriarch Kirill follows the Sergian line of illegitimate succession, it seems. And lo and behold, Kirill is “former” FSB. During the Red Terror, the Soviets created schisms within the true Church and even honeypot “anti-Soviet” traditional churches to lure the flock to their deaths. How can we be sure Putin will not (perhaps he already has) do the same? Golitsyn claimed in the 1980s-90s that the crypto-Soviet power would offer concessions to the Church—effectively gambits—as part of its long-range strategy to woo social conservatives. And this is exactly what happened. In the following quote, Golitsyn speaks of the subversion of the Church.

“It fails to understand that greater apparent official tolerance of religion in the Soviet Union is accompanied by a secret drive to increase Party and KGB penetration of the Catholic and other churches and to use agents therein for political and strategic purposes inside and outside the Soviet Union. As part of the programme to destroy religion from within, the KGB, in the late 1950s, started sending dedicated young Communists to ecclesiastical academies and seminaries to train them as future church leaders. These young Communists joined the Church, not at the call of their consciences to serve God, but at the call of the Communist Party in order to serve that Party and to implement its general line in the struggle against religion.” (pg. 116, The Perestroika Deception)

Brother Maurice Pinay spoke in the 1960s of the same phenomenon of subversives entering the Catholic priesthood. It seems the same has happened in the Orthodox Church. Both Kirill and the Bishop of Rome, Pope Francis, are ecumenists who espouse communist views. This only corroborates Golitsyn’s warnings.

Golitsyn narrows down Russia’s false democratisation plot and concludes with,

“It is, however, a false, cosmetic liberalisation. For example, the alleged religious relaxation is a spectacle produced and managed by the KGB and the high priests of the church who are KGB agents assigned to fulfill the strategy…In the present phase, secret agents in the Catholic and other churches are being used to implement Communist strategy. When they achieve their Communist world victory, they will use mass withdrawal of their agents to disrupt and destroy the churches. Never in its history since Nero has Christianity faced such a threat of possible destruction. The dictum of the late Pope Pius XII about the incompatibility of Communism and religion is as correct as ever. The Vatican should reaffirm this dictum and should use its influence and its ‘divisions’ to defend Western values from the new Communist assault. (pgs. 189, 116-117)

Keep in mind that Golitsyn said all of this long before Kirill became patriarch. Can you honestly say to yourself that it’s a mere coincidence that the “tobacco” metropolitan happened to be pulled from communist ranks of the KGB?

The idea that the Russian Federation is the last bastion of Christian orthodox theocracy and, therefore, must defend itself is a wonderful one, but it does not stand under scrutiny. Firstly, many proponents of this perceived Russian-theocratic state point to the number of NATO military bases surrounding Russia as an indication that Russia is not an aggressor but is, instead, only acting defensively. But they can’t seem to explain how this supposedly superior Western-led NATO military occupation couldn’t manage to stop Russia from annexing Crimea, much less retaliate. Aside from a few show sanctions imposed by then U.S. President Obama (a secret communist himself) and other Western nations following the annexation, we didn’t so much as see a budge from a single NATO tank in response. Why? The only two conclusions one can come to is that NATO and the West are not militarily superior to Russia and her allies or, worse yet, the two sides are in on the charade together. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty has been invoked only one time, following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks—provoking a Western-led military campaign in which Russia acted quite passively, even endorsing the U.S. narrative of things. Is NATO really anything more than just a show army designed to trick Westerners into thinking the communist threat is being dealt with while the threat actually becomes stronger? I fear this may be the case, especially seeing as the Soviet plan involves dismantling NATO by subversion, not by guns—the same way the Church is being co-opted.

In the spirit of Lenin and his living student Aleksandr Dugin, defenders of Russia point to the infectious moral decay of the West and how this legitimizes Russia’s social and geopolitical manoeuvrings. While this is true about the West’s moral decay, these defenders don’t seem to be asking themselves what the motive is behind these charges. It’s one thing to point out immorality from a Christian perspective but quite another to point it out for strategic reasons. Is Russia portraying the West as evil because it is truly evil or is it doing so to weaken its morale? I can’t count how many Westerners I have seen cheering on Russian (Soviet) penetration of the West thinking it will destroy globalism. How ironic and twisted. These same also fail to acknowledge the large Soviet hand in furthering the moral decay of the West. Soviet penetration of Western governments is one thing, but when you have Soviet penetration of the education system, it becomes all the more obvious how we got to where we are today. The Western counter-culture revolutions of the 1960s were largely hatched in the Soviet Union. Are we supposed to forgive and forget all of this because the media has shouted from every rooftop that communism has fallen? And why should we trust the media, when it is part of the morally decayed West? Think about how we learned of the fake collapse of communism: from Western media. If the “evil” West truly hated “orthodox” Russia, you would think they would have been a little more prudent in assessing the validity of the purported fall of communism. Why was it immediately accepted without any kind of investigation? The crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is playing a classic globalist dialectic of creating the problem: cultural Marxism in the West, and offering the solution: neo-Bolshevik one worldism led by Russia.

Father Ruskin, you claim that the European Union is collapsing of its own volition, but consider that Europe’s largest economy resides in Germany, whose head Angela Merkel happens to be a “former” Soviet. It’s reasonable to say that Germany sets the tone for the EU. All Russia would have to do to manipulate the EU is have at least one rogue EU state under its control; although, I am sure it’s actually more than just one. Germany fits this hypothesis. It could be said that Merkel is the single biggest saboteur of EU migration norms. With Merkel being a communist in the service of the crypto-Soviet Union, it seems that “Russia” is leading the campaign to de-Europeanize Europe. Yet, we are being told the opposite by Western Russophiles. Is it just a coincidence that Dugin’s Eurasian utopia concept is consistent with Kalergi’s Pan-European utopia?

As for Putin’s so called social conservatism, Russia recently has just had its first legal same-sex marriage. Russia’s decades of strategic corruption of Western mores has finally returned to its master. It’s now only a matter of time. And blaming the West will be invalid, as the Soviet Union was pretty much the birthplace of the sexual revolution. In their occultic vision, the serpent’s head has reached its tail.

Your concluding statement, “It’s drawing a long bow to suggest they resurrected the Church to lull us into a false calmness before deceptively overwhelming us,” describes what Golitsyn explains as failed Western analysis of the Soviet threat. And as the above quotes show, this is exactly the kind of sophisticated enemy with which we are dealing. This is not about fearing the Kremlin and its diabolical plans but about discerning it…in righteousness.

Respectfully yours,

Timothy Fitzpatrick

The Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church

To: E. Michael Jones, Professor Kevin MacDonald, Nick Griffin, Jeff Rense, Michael Rivero, James Corbett,  Henry Makow, Jordan Peterson, Patrick Wood, Nathanael Kapner, Mike Herzog, Christopher Bollyn, Michael Voris, David Duke
From: Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)
Subject: Open Letter regarding the Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church
Date: July 1, 2018 Anno Domini

via email

Dear Brothers:

A small minority of us in the Western nationalist movement feel it imperative to alert leaders and persons of influence in our sphere of the great Russia deception. For it seems the great majority in our movement are being deceived on a massive scale by a decades-old, highly sophisticated, and highly co-ordinated campaign to lure the Church and Western nationalists into a trap in order to finally clinch world communistic government.

Essentially, the deception lies in the mistaken belief in the collapse of communist power in Russia, in the supposed Sino-Soviet split, and in the alleged rebirth of conservatism/nationalism/Christian orthodoxy in the current Russian Federation. Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn attempted to warn the world of this grand Russia deception in the 1980s through his contacts in the Central Intelligence Agency; however, we fear his efforts may have been sabotaged by Zionist agents within the CIA, namely one James Jesus Angleton. As a result, his message appears to have been blocked from reaching the appropriate channels of power in government and, ultimately, omitted from foreign policy plans of Western nations.

Golitsyn laid out in his memoranda to the CIA (made public through his two books: New Lies for Old and The Perestroika Deception) how the long-range Soviet plan—based on Leninist deception methods—was to restructure communism in China and the Soviet bloc to the more aesthetically appealing democratic socialism in order to lull the West to sleep over the world communist threat. Once this step had been accomplished (in the 1990s), the plan was to move on to the next phase, which would involve what Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov described as the demoralization of the Western social sphere, where the crypto-Soviet regime would externalize onto the West a seemingly contradictory policy of promoting opposing extreme Right and Left ideals as well as identity politics—with the hope of disarming, destabilizing, and weakening it. The perceived mystique surrounding this hyper-normalization doctrine has kept the public and Western analysts from detecting the stealth long-range Soviet plan for world government. As we have learned through the latest U.S. presidential election, the Soviets have manipulated the U.S. electoral process, mainly by way of mimetic warfare through the cyber medium, which polarized the electorate using well organized online troll armies. It appears that the crypto-Soviets were not as concerned with the winner of the election as they were with the resulting polarization of the American populace. The alleged Soviet blackmail of Trump just happened to be an bonus and insurance policy on their strategy. At present, Russia appears to be feigning a return to conservatism and Orthodoxy as part of its two-tiered hyper-normalization deception. But make no mistake, it is all a ruse. The crypto-Soviet power is no friend to the Church, to the West, nor to the Russian people.

Not only does Golitsyn have a greater-than-90-per-cent accuracy rate through his hundreds of predictions of Soviet manoeuvres over the last three decades, he has corroboration through the admissions of one of the Soviets’ top modern Marxist prophets: Alexander Dugin. It is clear that Dugin—a self-described nationalist Bolshevist who helped found the Communist Party of the Russian Federation following the staged disintegration of the CPSU—is the rebirth of Karl Marx. His political theories are realizing Lenin’s vision for the final victory of world communism. Through a cleverly veiled dialectic, Dugin and his Duginism have apparently captivated Western nationalists, even Church leaders. They’ve been deceived into thinking Dugin’s Bolshevik concepts are aligned with the goals of Western nationalism and the Church’s social conservatism. Duginism appears to be the fulfillment of another important aspect of the world communist goal in the Warburg’s Kalergi Plan, which involves a push towards transhumanism and the de-Europeanization of the West through unfettered migration of mostly Islamic and Asiatic populations to Europe and its Western daughters in North America and Oceania. Dugin makes it clear in his many political papers that Russia and its KGB-invented Eurasian mandate for the world involves the disintegration of ethno and religious states and the integration of all peoples and faiths—the final realization of Judaeo-masonic world communistic government. Brother Maurice Pinay warned the world of this plan in The Plot Against the Church (1962).

The capstone of this great Russia deception lies in the Judaized global technocracy agenda, which is central to the planned communistic world government. We have learned that the existing Sino-Soviet axis is now fully dedicated to the development and integration of Israeli high technology (Talpiot program, 8200). This collectivist technocracy—as outlined in such schemes as the United Nations’ Agenda 21—will be mandatory for all citizens of the planned world government. The Soviets have the demoralized West occupied with identity politics and Balkanization schemes, like Kalergi, while Israel, Russia, China, and the BRICS solidify their alliance through the One Belt, One Road plan and construct the coming world government techno-infrastructure smart grid. It appears Russia is leading the disintegration of the West while Israel leads the technology aspect, and China the manufacturing aspect. Furthermore, Israel appears poised to replace its military sponsor in the United States with the militaries of both Russia and China. As we recently have seen, Russia is policing the Middle East on behalf of Israel with greater intensity. Golitsyn warned that this Judaeo-Sino-Soviet axis would use co-operation blackmail to get Western complicity. This can only mean that the axis is militarily superior to the West and NATO!

To address the causes of this deception proves difficult. One possible primary cause, and something which Golitsyn notes, is the repeated use of failed Western analysis of the highly complex Soviet strategy. Soviet defectors have told the West that Soviet propaganda relies to a great degree on the concept of controlled opposition, as was demonstrated with the Soviet Trust honeypot model under Lenin, and on the use of double agents. It seems that Western nationalists and Church leaders have failed to recognize the repeated use of these sophisticated tactics, save for some traditional Catholic opponents to the communist-inspired modernization of the Vatican and some faithful Eastern Orthodox, like in ROCOR and the Catacomb Church, who learned of Soviet manipulation and control of Church leadership (still going on). It is possible that our Catholic brothers may be further deceived by the great Russia deception due to their reliance on the Fatima prophecies, which predict a reconciliation of Russia with the Roman Catholic Church.

We implore you to rethink your position regarding Russia and its role in the reshaping of the world as we know it. If Golitsyn proves to be correct yet again, Western failure to detect and act upon this great Russian deception inevitably will result in its own demise, along with the Church as we know it. Embracing your future captors is not a good idea.

Sincerely,

Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)

A Zionist Spy for Soviet Intelligence

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 108-109

While the late Rep. Samuel Dickstein (D-N.Y.) is remembered today as one of “the great liberals” and as one of America’s most distinguished Jewish leaders, in the late 1930s—just prior to the advent of U.S. involvement in World War II—he was best known as the first figure in Congress to promote “Nazi-hunting” and “fighting fascism” as one of America’s top priorities. Dickstein crusaded as the ultimate advocate of“Americanism.” In fact, however, he was the ultimate Judas Goat. He was an enemy agent: a spy controlled by the Soviet Union’s secret intelligence service.

Although Dickstein has been memorialized as a “statesman” and “humanitarian” and other such high-sounding tributes in the American Jewish press, other assessments of the congressman—who served 11 terms, beginning in 1923—have not been so friendly. One critic called Dickstein “a smooth infiltrator, corrupt, greedy, and utterly amoral,” an early role model for many of the Judas Goats who populate the ranks of America’s Enemy Within today.

The truth about Dickstein’s role as a Soviet agent came out in the late 1990s in long-secret Soviet intelligence messages and files that are now accessible to American historians. In fact, Stephen Gettinger, an editor of the eminently “mainstream” and thoroughly non-partisan Congressional Quarterly said that the Dickstein affair was probably“the first clear-cut case of congressional spying in history.”

Dickstein

The record shows that Dickstein—who represented a famously “Jewish” congressional district on Manhattan’s Lower East Side—was recruited as a Soviet agent in 1937 by Peter Gutzeit, a gentleman who shared Dickstein’s religion and who also happened to be the New York station chief of the NKVD, the Soviet secret police. For a fee of $1,250 a month, Dickstein stole reams of secret documents from Congress and the War Department which he turned over to his Soviet handlers.

In addition, and perhaps even more importantly, Dickstein served as Moscow’s agent of influence in Washington by loudly attacking the nationalist European powers of Germany and Italy for their resolute opposition to Soviet Communism. Dickstein was perhaps one of the loudest and earliest among those agitating for U.S. pressure on Germany, with the intention of sparking U.S. military intervention in the war in Europe that later became World War II. Dickstein made headlines by accusing Americans who refused to support his war-like intentions of being “un-American”—a charge that, even today, Zionist elements use against good patriotic Americans who refuse to support endless American intervention in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.

And while there were many who simply attributed Dickstein’s hysteria to the fact that he was Jewish, and therefore an obvious foe of Adolf Hitler’s rule in Germany, the fact is, as we have seen, that Dickstein was also a quite greedy paid agent of the Soviet Union.

And what is particularly interesting is that Dickstein was among the early promoters of the establishment of what became known as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). The New York Times even called Dickstein “the founder of HUAC.” However, when HUAC began its inquiries it soon discovered that the real subversives on American soil were Soviet agents and that many real patriots in America simply saw no need for U.S. intervention in Europe in a war against Germany, Dickstein did an about-face and denounced the very committee that he had helped establish in the first place.

It ultimately turned out that Dickstein’s financial demands on his Soviet handlers were so endless that the NKVD assigned Dickstein the code name “Crook” in their internal memoranda and intelligence traffic. By 1938, Dickstein’s New York-based conduit to the NKVD, Peter Gutzeit, was warning his superiors in a memo that “‘Crook’ is completely justifying his code name. This is an unscrupulous type, greedy for money …a very cunning swindler.”(And this assessment was hardly the kind of favorable commentary about Dickstein that was appearing in the media at the time.)

In any case, by late 1940, Dickstein and his Soviet handlers parted company, but Dickstein had already done an immense amount of quite effective dirty work on behalf of his foreign sponsors. Dickstein left Congress following the 1944 election and became a judge on the New York State Supreme Court, dying in 1954 a very wealthy and honored man.This traitor’s papers—although not the evidence of his treason— are lovingly and respectfully preserved in the American Jewish Archives at the distinguished Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati.

Obviously, Dickstein would have probably been very pro-Soviet and anti-Nazi even without the financial support of his Soviet handlers, but the fact that he was prepared to secretly lend his efforts on behalf of secret Soviet agents—for money—says quite a lot about this so-called “statesman.” In fact, Dickstein is a classic model of one of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within who have done so much damage to America. And for this, if for no other reason, we must recall his sordid record.

The truth is that there are many more like him in Congress today. The record of politicians “on the take” from the Israeli lobby iis equally sordid but these politicians brag of being on the receiving end of foreign money, whereas Dickstein, of course, kept his treason close to his vest. And that says very much about how far off course America has gone.