High taxation and preparation for the Communist world state

By Rev. Denis Fahey
Excerpted from Rulers of Russia (1940), pgs. 90-92

There is, moreover, another aspect of the question. The crush­ing burden of taxation due to the payment of interest on debt is utilised as means for the preparation of Communism or of the Semi-Communist State advocated by P.E.P. Let us first hear Arthur Kitson on the burden of debt and then, some Socialist authorities on the end to which taxation is being directed.

The Builders’ Journal (April, 1939) quotes the following pas­ sage from Arthur Kitson’s writings: “Our National Debt on March 31st, 1919, was £7,434,949,429. From 1920 to 1933 inclu­ sive there has been paid towards the redemption of the National Debt £4,104,843,063. During the same period there has been paid in interest charges on the debt £4,288,925,186. . . . In spite of this, our National Debt on December 31st, 1933 (including our debt to the U.S.A.), was £7,947,000,000, being £512,000,000 morethan the original debt of March 31st, 1919! In other words, the nation has paid on account of the debt and itnerest charges the sum of £868,000,000 more than the original debt of March 31st, 1919, without reducing the original debt by one shilling!” Money- lending to nations seems to be even more lucrative than lending to individuals! Mr. Kitson, however, in The Bankers’ Conspir­ acy, shows that matters were still worse than these figures indi­ cate. The Cunliffe Currency Committee’s Report, issued in August, 1918, recommended the restoration of the gold-standard at the pre-War parity “without delay.” In The Bankers’ Con­ spiracy, p. 92, we read: “In advising the restoration of the gold- standard they are advising the Government to increase the Na­ tional Debt and so add to the burden of taxation which the British public will have to bear. At present our National Debt approxi­ mates to £8,000,000,000! But what are these pounds and with what were they subscribed? The Committee must know that the War Loans were subscribed in ‘cheap’ pounds, approximating in value to only one-half of the pre-War pounds. Hence our War debt, expressed in pre-War pounds, would be less than £4,000,000,000! By restoring the gold-standard, the public debt would therefore be doubled and become £8,000,000,000 at pre-war value!Hence every taxpayer would be compelled to pay twice the amount of taxes in his products and services by reason of the Commit­ tee’s recommendations. Very nice for the money-lenders and war- loan subscribers, but rather hard on the wealth producers and taxpayers! . . . The money-lenders’ code of morals—which the Committee apparently endorses—is that, whilst it is very wicked for debtors to defraud their creditors, creditors are quite justified in robbing their debtors. This seems to be the moral basis of the gold-standard.” It may be well to add that Mr. Winston Churchill restored the gold-standard in 1925.

On the other hand, “this high-taxing, high-spending policy is laid down in innumerable Socialist handbooks as an essential pre­ liminary to the imposition of full Socialism. Private enterprise is to be so crushed with burdens of every sort that it is glad to throw in the sponge and quit. . . . Taxation is the chief means/ says Britain’s Socialist Fabian Society in its Tract No. 127, add­ ing that ‘to the Socialist, the best of governments is that which spends the most.’ Similarly emphatic was a leading American exponent of Socialism, the late Morris Hillquit (a Jew whose real name was Misca Hilkowicz), who pointed out in his Socialism Summed Up (1913) that high taxes, shorter hours, and shorter week, freedom to strike, etc., the owners of businesses could be reduced to the point of being glad to be taken over by the State. Another eminent Jewish Socialist, Professor Laski, of the Lon­ don School of Economics, is equally strong on ‘the weapon of taxation’ . . . Mr. George Bernard Shaw, eminent British Social­ ist, puts the bedrock idea of the whole business very bluntly in the British Labour Monthly of October, 1921. He said: ‘Com­ pulsory labour, with death as the final penalty, is the keystone of Socialism.’ . . . In a fully Socialised state, opposition to the ruling clique must from the force of circumstances take the form of underground conspiracy, working secretly until it is strong enough for an open test of strength. Against this danger the ruling clique in turn must protect itself with a gigantic spy serv­ ice. . . . Russia’s gigantic spy service and perpetual ‘liquidations’ of suspected oppositionists are no accidental features. They are inherent in full Socialism. As to how they work out in practice a former Bolshevik Commissar of Justice named Steinberg gave the following description in the New York Times of February 23rd, 1930: ‘On the one side, we have intoxication with power and a realisation that anything done by him who wields power will go unpunished; and, on the other, fear, depression, silent hatred and sycophancy; the rise of two classes, masters and slaves. In

turn the relations among the suspects become themselves per­ verted. In the struggle to win the favour of the authorities, treachery assumes appalling dimensions. All become slaves with respect to the government, and wolves with respect to one another.’ The fatal defect of Socialism is its utter incompatibility with respect for personality. , . . Human freedom is drowned in an ocean of materialism. , . * The Marxian class-war is intended solely to set the Christians at one another’s throats. . , . The whole trend of Socialism is to deprive Christians of their prop­ erty and to reduce them to a sub-human, animal status. It puts them in the position the Talmud says it is their destiny to occupy. Finance-Capitalism began the work. Socialism completes it.”1

Notes:

  1. A. N. Field in Examiner, May. 1939.

The Perestroika Deception: Behind the Mask – part I

Putin is a proven fraud and communist, Russia and China in final preparations for military conquest of the West

Part II

By ‘Child of the Immaculata’ Apocalypse 12:17
July 7, 2019 Anno Domini

A truly peaceful nation does not speak and act in warrior terms. Although the East expends much effort in pretence of virtue, in script of the long-range communist deception strategy or ‘Perestroika Deception’, as revealed (with a predictive success of 94%) by Soviet defector Mr Anatoliy Golitysn (1), the mask slips. This is unavoidable, because as Our Blessed Lord said in Divine wisdom:

“For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh……….By their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 12:34-35 & 7:16)

Accordingly, Putin in clearly presaged delectation of Western conquest and the ravages of war, told Western journalists in 2008 that their wives should learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup’:

“He told Western observers who refused to monitor the forthcoming election, widely seen as a sham, that they should ‘
rather teach their own wives how to cook cabbage soup.’ (2)
In 2016, he revealed his true communist credentials, in declaring his like of communist and socialist doctrine:

‘You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,’ Putin said, referring to the KGB ‘
I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity’ he said. “I liked communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”(3)
 
Also in 2016, Putin made public evangelisation illegal.(4) Mr. Hannu Haukka, President of Great Commission Media Ministries, said, “This new situation resembles the Soviet Union in 1929. At that time, confession of faith was permitted only in church.”

And in 2018, in further affirmation that his apparent ‘Christianity’ is totally fake (5), he compared the mausoleum of Lenin with a Christian relic: “Putin went further by comparing the Communists’ attitude to the Bolshevik leader Lenin to the veneration of saints in Christianity. ‘Look, Lenin was put in a mausoleum.How is this different from the relics of saints for Orthodox Christians and just for Christians?”(6)

Putin’s words were music to the ears of Communist Party members. ‘I think these words of the president very effectively and reasonably smooth out the acute angles around the theme of the mausoleum’, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Ivan Melnikov said on Sunday, as cited by Interfax.

Earlier this year, Gennadiy Zyuganov, the head of the Russian Communist Party, said Putin had promised him that as long as he remains president, Lenin’s body would remain in the mausoleum in Red Square.

“As long as I sit here, there will be no barbarism in Red Square’ the Communist chief quoted Putin as saying at a conference with Russian party leaders.”

The fundamental identity of communism is hatred of God, externalised in violence, destruction, death and enslavement of men. As Marx said in excerpt of his poems:

I have power within my youthful arms
To clench and crush you with tempestuous force.
See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me.
 
If there is a something which devours, 
I’ll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins.
The world which bulks between me and the abyss,
I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly,
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action,

My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

 
I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above.(7) 

In his annual Presidential address on 1st March 2018, Putin displayed aggressive flex of Russian (ie. Soviet) ‘tempestuous force’ and ‘fire and action’. He said, ‘It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen to us now!”

For almost an hour in this speech, we see a peacock show of weaponry (from 1 hr 15 m 15 s). Note also that the delivery aircraft for his new ‘dagger’ missile system has the Soviet 5 pointed red-star on the tail-fin! (1 hr 38 m 21 s) And of course, his speech was inter-laced with the usual anti-Western propaganda and characterisation of the US especially, as aggressor.


The communist show of military might was the mark of the Soviets, before they implemented the ‘Perestroika Deception’. And as we see in their ‘victory day’ celebrations in Red Square this year, the same is true today (note the prominent hammer and sickle emblem in the lead photo of this article). Watch the a 17 minute video in reference (8). The fundamental to the whole parade was simply virulent military power.

What about Russia’s ally China? We see here  Karl Marx’s 200th birthday as celebrated in 2018 by the Chinese regime. In the forefront President Xi, who as with Gorbachev, has been cast in his role in deceit of his ‘avuncular’ appearance.

In January 2018, they conducted an ostentatious exercise in display of their military strength. (9) Ominously, Xi stated that the military should:
“create an elite and powerful force that is always ready for the fight, capable of combat and sure to win in order to fulfil the tasks bestowed by the Partyand not to fear death.”

Anatoliy Golitysn warned that alliance between Russia and China, is the final step before communist confrontation of the West:

‘Before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favour. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet “reconciliation.” The element of apparent duality in Soviet and Chinese policies will disappear. The hitherto concealed coordination between them will become visible and predominant. The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of one clenched fist to provide the foundation and driving force of a world communist federation. At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable.(10)

It is clear we have reached this stage!

September 2018

‘Russia has launched what it has called its largest ever military drills, with hundreds of thousands of troops joining Chinese soldiers.

Taking part in the drills are around 300,000 Russian soldiers, 36,000 military vehicles, 80 ships and 1,000 aircraft, helicopters and drones, as well as 3,500 Chinese troops.’ (10)

June 2019

‘Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping. Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin praised their countries’ ties during talks at the Kremlin, as Russia and China seek to shore up cooperation amid shared tensions with the United States.’President Putin is for me a best friend.’ Xi told journalists.’ (11)

Conclusion:

For those hood-winked that Putin is a virtuous Christian, then this falsehood is annulled in evidence above. His pretence of apparent ‘Christianity’ is faked to deceive the West, concomitant with the strategy to denigrate the West as evil and exalt the East in virtue, in self-justification for their pending attack on the West. Note there was no mention of God in his 2018 Presidential address. Only a display of hard military power for his communist audience, who in some cases exhibited frissons of exultation as Putin unveiled the new power of the Soviet fist. This is their first measure of national pride!

The ‘East good/West bad’ propaganda strategy has been revealed by Putin’s close confidante Alexander Dugin (12) of whom we should note, was condemned by the Russian Orthodox Church as a disciple of the satanist Aleister Crowley (12a) It has also been admitted by Margarita Simonyan, who is the the head of the media propaganda organ RT (13).

The truth of Putin is exposed by Sacred Scripture:

“For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers be transformed as the ministers of justice, whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)

Indeed, Putin as chief administrator of the ‘Perestroika Deception’, stands ready to destroy 5000 years of Western civilisation and take billions of lives. He is an anti-christ of the first grade and an acolyte of the communist ‘saint’ Lenin. As the Hungarian communist Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner (d. 1944) wrote in a poem; (14) THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN! LENIN! Gorbachev stated in a speech on the 15th November 1989 – SIX DAYS AFTER THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL; (15)

“We are for Lenin who is alive!” In order to achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society.

Well, the new society they intend is technocratic, communist enslavement for the entire world!

As Anatoliy Golitsyn said: ‘In the new worldwide communist federation the present different brands of communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism.’

So help us God!

In part 2, we will examine the East’s strategy of conquest for the West. Again, please distribute this information and in personal sacrifice of your reputation to a blinded world, if needs be. God gives much grace for such sacrifice (Mark 3:21).

 

References:

1)  Soviet analyst Mr Christopher Story (RIP) – video expounding Soviet multi-decade communist deception strategy.

‘The Perestroika Deception’ by Mr Anatoliy Golitsyn.

https://www.chinhnghia.com/GOLITSYN(Anatoliy)-Perestroika_Deception_(1998).pdf

2) Putin tells Western wives to learn ‘how to cook cabbage soup.’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578802/Vladimir-Putins-nuclear-threat-to-the-West.html

3) Putin still likes communist and socialist ideas very much.

https://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289

4) Putin signs law banning evangelism outside of churches.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/thousands-fasting-after-russian-president-putin-signs-law-banning-evangelism-outside-of-churches.html

5) Article Fitzpatrick Informer – Putin is a fake christian.

https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/sanhedrin-addresses-putin-as-jewish-king/

6) Putin compares mausoleum of Lenin with a christian relic.

https://www.rt.com/news/415883-putin-communist-ideology-christianity/

https://www.rt.com/russia/398319-putin-promised-to-keep-lenin/

7) Poetry of Karl Marx

https://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/marx.htm

8) Soviet ‘Victory Day’ parade 2019 – note at 10 m 49s, a young girl waving a Soviet flag and with a hammer and sickle brooch on her hat!

9) China war preparations.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2018/jan/04/xi-jinping-chinese-army-to-strengthen-war-preparedness-video

10) Anatoliy Golitysin – Russia/China ‘one-clenched fist’ strategy.

The Clenched Fist—Revisiting Golitsyn’s Predictions

11) Russia conducts largest ever military exercise with China.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/11/russia-largest-ever-military-exercise-300000-soldiers-china

11) Putin Hails ‘Unprecedented Relationship’ with China’s Xi Jinping.

12) Alexander Dugin – ‘to gain victory over the US in the coming ‘Great War’ is to use its vast media operations and assets in the alternative media to portray America as irredeemably evil.’

Dugin’s Published Plan to Destroy the West

12a) Dugin recites praises to satan from text of satanist Aleister Crowley.

13) RT’s chief editor, Margarita Simonyan, has said that the network she manages is like ‘a defence ministry’ and capable of ‘conducting information war against the whole Western world.’

RT Forces Employees to 20 years of Silence

14) Communist, freemason and Jew Laszlo Lakatos-Kellner – THE NEW CHRIST HAS ARRlVED, LENIN ! LENIN!

https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter4.html

15) Gorbachev speech – ‘We are for a Lenin who is alive!’

https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/category/forward-not-back/

Christian anti-Judaism contrasted with anti-Semitism

Charles Giuliani: a nihilist saboteur of the truth movement? Part 2

“For seventy years, from the Bolshevik Revolution to the closing years of the Gorbachev regime, militant atheism was the official religion, one might say, of the Soviet Union, and the Communist Party was, in effect, the established church. It was an avowed task of the Soviet state, led by the Communist Party, to root out from the minds and hearts of the Soviet state, all belief systems other than Marxism-Leninism.” 

J. D. Van der Vyver, John Witte – Religious human rights in global perspective: legal perspectives

Image

Soviet atheist magazine, The Godless, depicts Jesus Christ and the Russian Orthodox Church as scams to trap people. (Click image to enhance)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

If Christianity were the crypto-Jewish plot Charles Giuliani and his ilk claim it is, why then didn’t the Jewish Bolshevists use it instead of atheism-nihilism (materialism and naturalism) to topple the Tsar and enslave the Russian people? Why did the Jewish-Masonic revolutionaries bring down the Christian aristocracy in once-Catholic France in order to realize the bloody success of the French Revolution? Giuliani claims Christianity and religion in general are tools for oppression and control yet we find Illuminati regimes past and present using anything and everything diametrically opposed to Christianity to enslave the masses. Godlessness, in fact, was successful in absolutely oppressing and enslaving the Russian and French masses, not Christianity. But with the revolutionaries’ cries of the Jewish-Masonic slogan of “liberty, equality, and fraternity,” constantly echoing in the streets and the labour halls, the takeover had on a mask of liberation and democracy[1] that fooled most.

Now some may argue that the Jewish religion suffered persecution in the Soviet Union, and thus Soviet state atheism could not have been part of the Jewish takeover but, instead, legitimate opposition to it. But this argument holds absolutely no water considering the fact that 90 per cent of Bolshevist officials were Jewish, not to mention leaders Vladimir Lenin, Karl Marx (Moses Mordechai Levi Marx), and Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) were all Jewish. Even Stalin, who was married to a Jewess, founded the Union of Militant Atheists as a means to further eradicate Christianity from Russian culture. (The amount of information surrounding the Jewish engineering of the Russian Revolution is voluminous.)

In a shocking revelation, The Jewish Chronicle Supplement actually admitted on page three of its Feb. 26, 1937 edition that the pockets of Jewish persecution in the Soviet Union were the work of the hands of the Jews themselves and provided a means to an end for the greater Jewish-Bolshevist goals.

“It is a known fact in Russia, in so far as there was persecution of the Jewish religion, it never came from the higher staff authorities but from the Jewish Communists, who were, in most cases, sons of strictly religious fathers….”

Furthermore, we read in an article published in the January 1934 edition of American Jewish Journal:

“There is no doubt that the old, traditional Jewish synagogue is rapidly dying out in Russia. It is not dying because of Communist persecution, as many would like to believe, or any other outside influence, but simply because of a natural law of life. The youth has deserted it. Go over to the Jewish Communist Club on Tverskaya Street and you will find plenty of them.”

Jewish-mandated state atheism was so widespread and untouchable in the Soviet Union that it even regularly got away with defaming Jesus and the much-cherished Russian Orthodox Church. Under the murderous reign of Lenin and Stalin, Christian churches were burned, orthodox priests were tortured and crucified, and average Christians were murdered or rounded up to work as slaves in the Gulags. “Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism,” Lenin once said. Famous Russian playwright Mikhail Bulgakov accused a Soviet atheist magazine, Bezbozhnik (the godless), of being run by Jews in his 1925 diary. (The magazine was shut down in 1941 when the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union.)

“Today I went specially to the editorial office of Bezbozhnik. It is located in Kozmodemyanovsky Lane, not far from the Mossovet building. I was with MS and he charmed me from the outset…..In the evening when I leafed through the issues of Bezbozhnik I was shaken. Not by the blasphemy, of course it knows no limits, but it is only an external feature. The heart of the matter lies in the idea, which can be proved with reference to actual documents: Jesus Christ is depicted as a swindler and a scoundrel: the attack is directed at him. It is not hard to see whose work this is. This is a crime like no other.”

Of course, the Jews’ most revered religious text, the Babylonian Talmud, calls Jesus Christ many horrible things, not the least of which is a “bastard” and the “son of a whore.” It’s hardly a stretch to say that Bezbozhnik was regurgitating aspects of the Jewish Talmud.

Image

Soviet nihilist/atheist magazine “The Godless” depicts Soviet labourers dumping Jesus Christ out of a wheelbarrow. (Click image to enhance)

Now, Giuliani can downplay my accusations and simply claim not to be an atheist but, instead, some kind of agnostic thinker. He makes a point of not saying exactly to what belief he subscribes. Regardless, his anti-religious rhetoric sprinkled with cheap critiques of International Jewry (“Elite Jew Pigs! Elite Jew Pigs!”) reveals that he is a dedicated nihilist walking in the tradition of Jewish Bolshevism, what is today called cultural Marxism. He attempts to cloud his audience’s perception of this by raising random shades of morality. On a recent Truth Hertz show, he criticized the television show Two and a Half Men for promoting “filth.”

Nihilism is fundamentally utilitarian and agnostic. For Giuliani to deny that, as a nihilist he has much in common with socialist and radical leftist Jews, is deceptive or self-deceptive. And this applies to all agnostic types in the movement who erroneously believe they serve as a bastion of pure anti-Judaism. For them to criticize Christianity as being a Jewish subversive organization is highly inappropriate and hypocritical.

Giuliani continually talks out both sides of his mouth. He calls the Bible evil while denying the validity of Christianity or religion at all. Meanwhile, Christianity is arguably the foremost religion to define evil and establish a standard by which to measure it. So, Giuliani rejects the Bible but accepts the Christian concept of evil. And he, nor his followers, see the contradiction in this?

Could Giuliani’s utter contempt for the Bible and his obsession with the idea of an unjust God springing from it possibly reveal his inner turmoil? The following assertion by the late Father Seraphim Rose seems to sum up well Giuliani’s struggle.

“Atheism, true ‘existential’ atheism burning with hatred of a seemingly unjust or unmerciful God, is a spiritual state; it is a real attempt to grapple with the true God.… Nietzsche, in calling himself Antichrist, proved thereby his intense hunger for Christ.” —Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age

Atheism is Satanism 33

Giuliani as a psychoanalyst in the tradition of Freud

In part 1 of this series, I claimed that Giuliani bordered on psychoanalyzing Christians and religious persons. But upon further reflection and after listening to more of his shows and reading his “books” (they are really nothing more than pamphlets for sale), I would go so far as to say that he indeed does exhibit the behaviour of a typical psychoanalyst.

“Folks, it’s schizophrenia; it really is,” he says of Christianity in one of his many and incessant pathologizations of Christianity and Western Culture.[2] This is just as Jewish psychoanalytic father Sigmund Freud proposed, that Christianity was nothing more than a mental illness, a neurosis that must be wiped out in order to free humanity. Christian self-denial and the suppression of sex, they say, result in evil and anti-Semitism via projection.

“Jews suffer to a lesser extent than gentiles from the erosion of cultural supports for high-investment parenting,” writes Professor Kevin MacDonald, one of the foremost critics of Freud today, “and Jews benefit by the decline in religious beliefs among gentiles. As Podhoretz (1995, 30) notes, it is in fact the case that Jewish intellectuals, Jewish organizations like the American Jewish Congress, and Jewish-dominated organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs, attempted to undermine the public strength of Christianity, and have led the fight for unrestricted pornography. The evidence of this chapter indicates that psychoanalysis as a Jewish-dominated intellectual movement is a central component of this war on gentile cultural supports for high-investment parenting.”[3]

So where does the American Jewish Congress end and Charles Giuliani begin? The above statement by MacDonald is all the more interesting considering MacDonald himself is an atheist. He does not see Christianity as furthering Jewish evolutionary strategies but, instead, acting as a hindrance toward them

Christianity easily the dominant force in the struggle against Jewish power

Whether it’s the Spanish Inquisition, the writings of the Church Fathers over 2,000 years, or the various Christian-initiated European pogroms, there is simply no question that Christianity has led the charge against Jewish power throughout the ages. Even the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, where the sacred Jewish Temple of Solomon was destroyed and one million Jews killed, is considered to be the work of God through the Roman Empire, foretold in Christ’s Olivet discourse.

“And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to [him] for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” —Matthew 24:1-2

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.” —Luke 21:20

From Protestant reformer Martin Luther (The Jews and their Lies, 1543) to Christian Sergius Nilus (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 1895) spreading the truth globally about the international Jewish conspiracy, Christians have led the charge into modern times. I doubt very much that the nihilist anti-Judaic could come up with a résumé that would even come close to matching that of Christianity.

Take a look at just some of the prominent names of those brave Christians who have fought the good fight on behalf of Christ and His Kingdom over the last 2,000 years. The following list is by no means comprehensive or in any particular order.

Sergius Nilus

Sergius Nilus: The man who brought the world the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Vicomte Léon de Poncins

Maurice Pinay

Brendon O’Connell

John the Baptist

Isaiah the Prophet

Jeremiah the Prophet

The 12 apostles of Christ

Benjamin Freedman

Texe Marrs

Mark Glenn (Charles Giuliani had the audacity to call Glenn a “Zionist” on his show with Revolt of the Plebs last week)

Jesus Christ

Origen

Doug Christie

Fritz Springmeier

Rev. I. B. Pranaitis

Arnold Leese

St. Augustine

St. John Chrysostom

Mel Gibson

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Lady Queenborough Edith Star Miller

James Keegstra

Michael Hoffman II

Flavius Josephus

Ted Pike

Ernst Zundel

Rev. Denis Fahey

H. A. Gwynne

Joseph M. Canfield

Carol Valentine

Elizabeth Dilling

Bobby Fisher

Athanasius

Bishop Richard Williamson

Brother Nathanael Kapner

Mordechai Vanunu

David Duke

Tertullian

James Shaw

Johann Andreas Eisenmenger

Stephen the Martyr

The Russian Tsar

A True Ott

Israel Shamir

If it weren’t for brave men and women like these, it is doubtful as to whether the anti-Jewish movement would exist today to the degree it does. If it weren’t for men like the above-mentioned, many would still be drinking the Holocaust Kool Aid today, among other flavours. Areligious people, not by any stretch of the imagination, can be credited for the depth of knowledge of world Jewry we have today. Professor Kevin MacDonald would be one exception, off the top of my head; I am sure there are others, but not many. The areligious opportunists like Giuliani know this fact, but they don’t care; they have hijacked this historically Christian movement for their own personal gain—with the only real beneficiaries being the Jews in this case.

Christians aim to help a person eliminate sin from their life—sin, which is at the root of the Jewish problem. Meanwhile, anti-Judaic atheist types attempt to eliminate the Jew only. Do you think sin will disappear with the Jew once he is finally dead and gone? No other group of people will rise up in the Jews’ place? This is as naive thinking as Giuliani levels against Christians. Do you think that no other group of people, other than the Jews, have oppressed humans

If sin were a tree, Judaism would be its branches. And while anti-Judaic atheists spend all of their time shearing the branches, the Christian is down on the ground with an axe.

Christianity’s diametric opposition to Judaism

Judaism today remains a racist, exclusively tribalistic religion based on superstition, sorcery, witchcraft, subversion, dishonesty, carnality, and whose adherents are obsessed with law. In contrast, Christianity is universal in its outreach and based on love, justice, altruism, spirituality and repentance; although, its adherents don’t always live up to these. We are all human after all. It is true that Christianity came via the Hebrews, but it is not of the Hebrews. It is of God alone. No man may boast, and God is no respecter of men. And because greater Christianity absolutely rejects a Zionist interpretation of scripture, it is not a Zionist religion by any means, despite a small minority of “evangelicals” in the United States of America claiming different. (See John Hagee, Jack Van Impe et al.)

Revolt of the Plebs blogger Keith Johnson, another nihilist type in the truth movement, admits that the Jews had to insert footnotes into the Bible in order to Judaize the Church. But if Christianity is fundamentally Zionist, as Giuliani claims, the Jews should not have needed to create the Scofield Reference Bible in the first place. Furthermore, if the Old Testament is such a Zionist influence, why then did the Pharisees see the need to create the Talmud and the Kabballah? Shouldn’t have the Old Testament sufficed? Following the Torah, the latter parts (majority of the Old Testament) are full of anti-Judaism, mainly in the writings of the prophets[4], whom the Jews murdered as a result. But Giuliani only ever focuses on the Mosaic books. The rest of the Old Testament doesn’t corroborate his bias interpretation of the Torah. And any Biblical scholar knows that true interpretation is based on other scripture—“Let scripture interpret scripture”, not on man’s thinking. A true rendering of the Torah cannot be obtained without first comparing it with the rest of scripture. Where inconsistencies are found, other places in the Bible clarify them.

While there is a form of nationalism in the Old Testament, what one could misconstrue as Zionism, it was merely a temporal condition and not the original or ultimate purpose of God. National Israel was a foreshadowing of a global people for God. (Foreshadowing is used in many places throughout the Bible, specifically when dealing with prophecy.) And that is where the New Testament comes into play, with its universalistic approach to God’s dealings with His creation.

“Modern orthodoxy is not the religion of the Bible and of the Prophets. It is a post-Biblical or Talmud religion built up by the Pharisees and doctors of the Law between the second and fifth centuries after Jesus Christ, to preserve the small minority of Jews who had not followed Christ, and to consummate the definite break from triumphant Christianity.

“The universalist, messianic, finalist Judaism of the Prophets ended with Jesus, and conquered the world in Christian form.

“Legal national Judaism kept its God exclusively in the community of its choice, which it has striven to protect from the dangers that constantly threaten it. It is based on an interpretation of Biblical texts by oral, not revealed, traditions called Mischna, Gemara, Halaka, and Hagada. This collection, known as the Talmud, was first conceived of in Jerusalem towards the end of the second century and completed in Babylon in the fifth century. The two Talmuds consist of eleven volumes in octavo and are twenty times the size of the Bible.”

(Dr. A. Roudinesco: Le Malheur d’Israel, pp. 114-115)

Renowned researcher Michael Hoffman, who strongly opposes the idea of a “Judeo-Christian” tradition, elaborates:

“There is no fundamental opposition between spirit and matter in Judaism. When Jesus declared in John chapter 6 that ‘the flesh profiteth nothing,’ he was violating the oral tradition of the Pharisees: ‘Rabbinic anthropology differs in this respect from…Christian-anthropology…there is not a fundamental metaphysical opposition between (body and soul)…’ Judaism celebrates the body to such a sordid extent that it even has a defecation prayer which every Talmudic male is commanded to recite every time he relieves himself: ‘Blessed art thou O Lord…who has made the human in its orifices and holes.’ Everything about Orthodox Judaism is either a distortion or falsification of the Old Testament, because it is based on anthropomorphic traditions that void the Old Testament by means of a series of dispensations and loopholes. These begin with the Mishnah, which represents the commitment to writing of the occult legends and lore of those Israelites who had preserved ‘secret knowledge’ which had arisen with the worship of the golden calf, of Molech and similar abominations. With the rejection of their Messiah and the commitment of the formerly oral traditions to writing, these Israelites completely abandoned themselves to a perversion which had once been only a persistent underground stream polluting Israel, but after Christ’s crucifixion, emerged as the main ideology of those who refused to accept Jesus as their savior.

(Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp. 145)


[1] Rev. Denis Fahey – Note on Democracy, The Rulers of Russia pages 99-100 – Third Edition, Revised, and Enlarged (1986)

[3] Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique (1998) pages 147-148

[4]  Mark Glenn, The Ugly Truth – Portions of the Book of Jeremiah http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/portions-of-the-book-of-jeremiah/