The ‘August coup’ hoax that legitimized the fake collapse of communism

Moscow. The 19th of August 1991. Boris Yeltsin addresses people from the top of a tank. Photo TASS / Valentin Kuzmin; Alexander Chumichev (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
June 22, 2019 Anno Domini
Excerpt: The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 137-144 (1998)

THE FAKE ‘AUGUST COUP’ AND ITS CALCULATED FAILURE

A deliberately engineered ‘Break with the Past’

Who called the shots in the USSR before the ‘coup’ and who introduced the ‘reforms’? Gorbachev and his ‘liberals’? NO, the Party and its strategists.

Who is calling the shots now and who proposed the coup to replace Gorbachev? The ‘hardliners’, the Minister of Defence and the Chief of the KGB? NO, the Party and its strategists.

The ‘coup’ was proposed in accordance with the requirements of the Soviet strategy of convergence leading to eventual World Government. This strategy and its moves, like the present Soviet ‘coup’, can only be understood in the light of the theories of one of the principal Soviet agents of influence, namely Sakharov, and his timetable for convergence. According to Sakharov, during the first phase the Leninist realists (i.e. Gorbachev and other ‘liberals’) will expand and strengthen ‘democracy’ and economic reform in the USSR and other socialist countries.

As we know, this has already happened.

According to Sakharov, in the second phase the pressure exerted by the Soviet example and by the internal progressive forces would lead to the victory of the Leftist Reformist Wing (the Soviet term for American liberals) which would begin to implement a programme of collaboration and convergence with the USSR on a worldwide scale, entailing changes in the structure of ownership. According to Sakharov, this phase would include an expanded role for the intelligentsia and an attack on the forces of racism and militarism.

We had reached this phase before the war with Iraq. In the assessment of the Soviet strategists, the US victory over Iraq adversely affected the political balance in the United States. In their view, the victory weakened and demoralised the liberals (or Leftist Reformists) and strengthened the centrist and conservative forces and the US military. This disturbed Soviet plans to carry out their strategy of convergence.

They saw that their main political allies in achieving convergence with the United States had been weakened. Accordingly they engineered this strategic ‘coup’ to reverse and improve the political fortunes of their American allies. Seen in strategic terms, the main purpose of Gorbachev’s ‘dismissal’ is further to confuse American opinion and to alter the political landscape in the United States so as to accelerate the progress of the Soviet strategy and to put it back on the rails.

This strategy is a deliberate and coordinated walk towards ultimate victory by advancing first the left leg of action by ‘liberals’, then the right leg of action by ‘hardliners’ and then once more the left leg of action by ‘liberals’. The ‘dismissal’ of Gorbachev is temporary. In earlier Memoranda I predicted a calculated ‘resignation’ by Gorbachev and his eventual return to power.

The ‘coup’ confirms this prediction. According to my analysis, the ‘coup’ is aimed at intensifying American anxieties over the fate of Gorbachev and the other ‘liberals’ and ‘reformists’ in the USSR like Shevardnadze. When these concerns reach their peak, the Soviet strategists’ next move can be expected. They will return Gor- bachev and other ‘liberals’ to power through a campaign of strikes and demonstra- tions organised by the Party.

As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev’s return and the strengthening of the ‘reformists’ in the USSR will also strengthen the American liberals, revive their fortunes and help them win future elections – leading eventually to the convergence of the United States and the USSR. In short, Gorbachev’s return will be a repetition of the device of the suppression of Solidarity in Poland, followed by its victory.

The main purpose of the ‘coup’ is to reverse an unfavourable situation for potential Soviet allies in the United States and to create favourable conditions for the implementation of the convergence strategy. The second objective is to secure the non-violent creation of the new Soviet Federation of Republics. The third objective is to provide any potential adventurers there may be in the Soviet military with a lesson and thereby to eliminate any possibility of a genuine coup in the future.

Moscow, August 20, 1991. Russian President Boris Yeltsin makes communist first salute and speaks at a rally held in support of “democracy”. (Photo by: Sovfoto/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SOVIET ‘COUP’

The point has already been made that Gorbachev will be returned to power at the moment when it best serves the Soviet strategy of convergence. Depending on the circumstances prevailing at the appropriate time, he could be returned to power through an election, after a period of other activities .

His alleged removal from power and house arrest are deliberate devices to build up his popularity before such an election. Meanwhile one can expect that the Soviet strategists intend to replace him or to add to his team another ace card, the ‘anti-Communist’ (but, like Gorbachev, protege of Andropov) Boris Yeltsin, leader of the Russian Republic. As the Soviet strategists see it, Gorbachev has exhausted the influence he exerted on their behalf in the West. He was unable to extract more econ- omic aid at the London Summit Meeting and his advice concerning a diplomatic solution to the conflict with Iraq was ignored by President Bush. It is the strategists’ belief that Boris Yeltsin will give greater credibility in the West to Soviet economic and political ‘reform’. He will be in a better position to exploit his influence to extract additional economic aid from the West and, in particular, to obtain from the West a commitment to a new Marshall Plan for Russia.

A Marshall Plan for Russia is one of the primary interim objectives of the Soviet strategists and one that Gorbachev failed to achieve. The strategists expect that Yeltsin will be able to exert greater influence in diplomatic, economic and political relationships and will receive more cooperation in the international arena particularly in the Middle East and at the United Nations. One can expect that the Soviet strategists will come forward with fresh initiatives combined with deliberate provo- cations and crises in order to enhance the role of the United Nations.

They will do this because they regard the United Nations as a stepping stone to a future World Government The Soviet political game and the Soviets’ trickery in ‘manipulating’ politicians like Gorbachev and Y eltsin for W estern public consumption demand more imagination and a better grasp of these machinations from the Bush Administration. For example, to proceed with the appointment of Mr Robert Strauss as the new Ambassador in Moscow is a great mistake because the appointment is being made at a time when the Soviet strategists are deliberately undermining the credit and prestige President Bush gained from his dealings with Gorbachev. They are undercutting the President in favour of their political allies – namely, the American liberals. Nowadays the situation is more serious than it was after the Second World War. President Truman woke up to the nature of Stalin’s mentality, his deeds and his intentions. The Bush Administration, by contrast, has no understanding of Soviet strategy and its ultimate, aggressive, strategic designs against the United States.

Given this situation and the Soviet ‘game plan’, the President, instead of appointing a politician/businessman like Robert Strauss as American Ambassador in Moscow, should consider appointing someone like Richard Helms or General Vernon Walters – that is to say, a professional man and an intelligence expert who might see through the Soviet game plan and help the Administration as General Bedell Smith helped President Truman in 1947.

THE AUTHOR’S ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CALCULATED SOVIET ‘COUP’ AND OF ITS CALCULATED ‘FAILURE’

According to my assessment, the Soviet ‘coup’ and its ‘failure’ constituted a grandiose display of deception – a provocation. The ‘ineptitude’ of the participants in the ‘coup’ and the ‘failure’ of it were skilfully planned and executed. The main argument in support of this assessment is that the Soviet military, the KGB, the Party and leading media figures apparently had neither the skill to launch a successful coup nor the guts to crush resistance to it. This is news indeed!

Oleg Kalugin, former KGB general, giving a speech after the Russian government forces suppressed the fake August Coup – an attempt by supposed hard-line members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) to take control of the country. Moscow, Russia, on August 20, 1991. (Photo by Wojtek Laski/Getty Images)

Facing a real crisis in Hungary in 1956, the same forces displayed exceptional skill, knowhow and determination in crushing a genuine revolt. Knowledge of the Soviet mentality and of Moscow’s record of ruthless action has convinced this analyst that the Soviet military, the Party and the leaders of the media all have the skill, the will and the courage to crush genuine resistance and opposition. They did not display them on this occasion because the abortive ‘coup’ was carried out in accor- dance with Party instructions; and it was the Party and the Komsomol themselves which organised the alleged resistance to it.

The real participants both in the ‘coup’ and in the ‘failure’ were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party offi- cials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interests of the Party’s strategy and under the guidance of its strategists. The calculated nature of the ‘coup’ and its timing show that it was staged by the Russian, President Yeltsin, to save the essence of the Union at the time of transition to a new form of federation.

The abortive ‘coup’ and the ‘resistance’ to it were carefully calculated displays intended primarily for the West. This explains why Western media contacts with Moscow were not curtailed. On the contrary, the big guns of the Soviet media like Vitaliy Korotich and representatives of the Arbatov Institute were on hand both in Moscow and in the United States to ‘help’ the Western media with their interpretation of developments in the USSR. The episode shows how well Soviet strategists like Arbatov and his experts on the American media have mastered the art of projecting such displays for consumption by the American media, and throughout the West.

The Soviet strategists sought to underline for the West the dramatic ineptitude of the ‘coup’ and the spectacular courage and resistance displayed by the new ‘Russian democrats’ and their leader Yeltsin in ‘defending’ the Soviet Parliament – their symbolic equivalent of ‘The White House’. The main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratisation is genuine, that it has the support of the people and that it is working. They want to convince the West that Western investment in the USSR will pay dividends.

They expect that the West will now respond with a new Marshall Plan which will bring Western technology flooding in to the Soviet Union, promoting joint ven- tures and stimulating a restructuring of the Soviet economy along the lines of the revival of the German and Japanese economies after the Second World War.

Internally, one objective is to influence the Soviet population towards acceptance of the new Party-controlled ‘democracy’ as a real power and to develop the strength and maturity of the new ‘democratic’ structure and the popularity of its leaders, especially Yeltsin. Another objective is to exploit this staged ‘coup’ in order to reorganise and ‘reform’ the Soviet bureaucracy, the military, the intelligence and counter-intelligence organisations and the diplomatic service, and to give them a new ‘democratic’ image.

The Soviet strategists realise that only with such a new image, implying a ‘Break with the Past’ and severance from Communism, can these organisations be converted into effective weapons for convergence with their counterparts in the United States. A further internal objective is to emphasise the change in the system by means of the spectacular, televised but calculated removal of old Communist symbols like the monuments to Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy, and the red banners.

These changes do not represent a genuine and sincere repudiation of Soviet design and intentions to secure an eventual world victory. Although very spectacular, the changes are cosmetic. They demonstrate only that Arbatov and others know how to manipulate the American and other Western media through the use of powerful symbols such as the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the toppling of Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy statues and Yeltsin’s staged ‘defence’ of the Soviet ‘White House’.

If the Soviets were truly moving towards genuine democracy, and were intent on a true ‘Break with the Past’, these symbolic changes would be accompanied by the introduction and implementation of a de-communisation programme, the irrevocable (not cosmetic) prohibition of the Communist Party and Komsomol organisations at all levels throughout the USSR, and the removal of ‘former’ Party and Komsomol members from all the main seats of power including the KGB, the Soviet army and its political commissar administration, the Ministries, especially those for the Interior and Foreign Affairs, and the trade unions.

Yeltsin has allegedly banned the Communist Party in Russia. But the question should be asked: ‘Why did he forget to ban the Komsomol youth organisation?’ [Note: According to ‘The New York Times’ of 29 September 1991, the Komsomol voted to dissolve itself; its regulations were changed ‘to allow subordinate youth leagues in the Soviet Republics to succeed it’ – Author’s emphasis].

To carry conviction, the necessary purge of former Communists would have to be carried out at all levels, as was the intention with the de-nazification programme in Germany after the war. Without any such programme, present changes, however impressive, will remain cosmetic.

There are at present no means of distinguishing reliably between a genuine democrat and a former Communist in Russia. However one important criterion for judging the sincerity of the abrupt and virtually simultaneous conversion of former Communist leaders into true democrats would be a frank official statement from them that the Soviet Party and Government adopted a long-range strategy in the years 1958 to 1960, that ‘perestroika’ is the advanced phase of this strategy, and that it is to be abandoned forthwith in favour of normal, open, civilised relations. There has been no sign whatsoever of any such admission.

Further criteria for judging the sincerity of the abrupt conversion of ‘former’ Communist leaders into believers in true democracy would need to include:

  • An official admission that the ‘dissident movement’ and its leader, Sakharov, were serving the interests of that strategy under KGB control;
  • Public exposure of the main KGB agents among Soviet scientists, priests, writers and theatre and movie personalities who have been playing an active role in the KGB-controlled political ‘opposition’ – especially those like the ‘conservative’ Kochetov and the ‘liberal’ Tvardovskiy who in the 1960s engaged in a Party- and KGB-controlled debate intended to convey the false impression that Soviet society was evolving towards democracy;
  • And finally: a categorical repudiation of any strategic intention on the part of the Soviets of working towards ‘convergence’ with the United States.

The self-evident absence of any of these criteria indicates that the symbolic changes mean no more than that the strategists had reached the conclusion that the old symbols had outlived their usefulness – at least, in the Soviet Union and East- em Europe – and had to be replaced by new, more attractive, popular symbols.

Moreover these cosmetic changes are logical and were predicted earlier by this ana- lyst. The Soviets realised that convergence with the United States cannot be achieved under the old compromised symbols like Lenin, Dzerzhinskiy and others associated in the Western mind with terror, repression, exile and bloodshed. Convergence requires the introduction of new, attractive, national and ‘democratic’ symbols conveying the impression that Soviet ‘democracy’ is approaching the Western model.

No doubt these cosmetic changes, the reorganisation of the Soviet bureau- cracy and the new, more enigmatic status of its leaders like Yeltsin will be seen by the West as a deepening of the process of Soviet’ reform’, offering new opportunities for Western policy. But the West’s main weakness remains unchanged: it cannot grasp the fact that it is facing an acceleration in the unfolding of Soviet convergence strategy which is intended to procure the subservience of the West to Moscow under an ultimate Communist World Government.

The Machiavellian boldness and imagination displayed by the Soviet strategists through their staged ‘coup’ and its preordained defeat are alarming. No doubt these manoeuvres will be followed not only by faked suicides, but also by staged trials of the alleged leaders of the ‘coup’. These leaders may well be sentenced to apparent prison terms. But in fact they will live in comfortable retirement in resort areas like the Crimea and the Caucasus. Russia is a big country and places can be found for them to hide.

The ‘coup’ and its ‘defeat’ show that the Soviets will go to any lengths in pur- suit of their convergence strategy. This reminds me of remarks by Vladimir Zhenikhov, the former KGB Rezident in Finland, and Aleksey Novikov, another KGB officer, at the time the strategy was adopted in 1961.

Both of them had recently returned from home leave in Moscow. When I asked for the latest news from headquarters, both replied using different words but to the same effect: ‘This time the KGB are going to finish with capitalist America once and for all’. I believed them then, and I believe that what is happening now is a bad omen for Western democracy.

The other alarming aspect of the situation is Western euphoria and the uncritical acceptance of present Soviet developments at their face value. This shows how easily the West can be taken in by staged Soviet spectacles, and how justified the strategists are in believing that their ‘era of provocations’ will produce the intended results. Furthermore, Western euphoria and naivete serve only to encourage the Soviet strategists to stage new spectacles more convinced than ever that their strategic designs are realistic.

Russia Insider is a honeypot

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 12, 2018 Anno Domini

Russia Insider is the rebirth of Russian-Jewish oligarch Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

Both strategically use anti-Jewish narratives in order to honeypot gullible people, at which point the sticky-lipped dupes are either rounded up and imprisoned or simply indoctrinated.

It is the latter in the case of Russia Insider, which is a go-to source for many Westerner alternative media junkies and Russia supporters.

Started in 2014 with the help the Kremlin and its oligarchic mafia (like Duginist Konstantin Malofeev), at the time when the neo-Bolshevik Putin regime was amping up its aggression against Ukraine, Russia Insider is the perfect Soviet double agent within the Western nationalist movement (not the first time the nationalist movement was infiltrated by the Soviets). They say all the right things at the right time, but when push comes to shove, they play the Judas Goat and mislead their audience into a Soviet Trust land of hypernormalized confusion and disinformation. One of Russia Insider’s creators, John Helmer, is alleged to have been recruited by the KGB. Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman has been featured on Kremlin-state media.

Looking at the lead article today at Russia Insider: “CHUTZPAH: CIA/Mossad Instigate Chemical Attack in Syria, Accuse Syria of Doing It”, the Soviet active measure of demoralizing the West is furthered. Instead of being told the truth, that Israel and Russia are the main players destroying Syria with largely Russian-groomed Chechen Jihadists, the clever crypto-Soviets spin it to being the fault of the “evil West”…then throw Israel in the mix as the gambit (notice it puts the CIA first, before Mossad). Peruse the rest of the site and all you will find are “articles” that can’t say enough great things about Putin and the Kremlin.

Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman featured on Kremlin-controlled state media multiple times.

Of course, this is all OK with Israel, because Israel is simply helping big brother Russia execute its long-range goal of demoralizing and destabilizing the West. Israel doesn’t mind being thrown under the bus, so long as it serves the overall goal of destroying the West and bringing it within the grip of its Judeo global governance scheme, with Israel, Russia, and China leading the world into the “Olam ha ba”. And what better cover than for Russia Insider to pretend to be opposed to globalism, a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup.

Almost all of the Western alternative media serves very much the same purpose: blame everything on the West (resulting in divide-and-conquer polarization), vindicate Russia and Arab Soviet satellites (Iran, Syria, etc.). This game is so obvious. Putin is not mystical or that unpredictable. His hypernormalization strategy is now out in the open. He is simply a more sophisticated Soviet leader pursuing the usual active measures against the West, but this time, he has a lot more Western leaders compromised than his predecessors had—take for example Angela Merkel in Soviet satellite Germany. Putin’s Red predecessors only really had Eastern Germany to puppeteer. Now the Kremlin has all of it and its largest economy in the European Union.

Stephen Lendman is Trotskyite controlled opposition

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 29, 2018

Opinion writer Stephen Lendman is the quintessential alternative media Putin and Trump cheerleader these days.

He seemed to ride in a decade ago among the patriot movement on the coattails of anti-Zionism, even though he appears to believe in a pure form of Zionism that is true to Torah. Once, upon entering online conspiracy circles (as far back as 2006?), Lendman had stripped away the guard of truthers, he was able to bring in his real agenda: Trotskyite communism, which naturally entails promoting the de-Stalinized crypto-Soviet state of Russia, headed by organized crime-installed Vladimir Putin and run by international Jewish crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch.

Initially, Lendman got his push from big alt media aggregates like Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero, and others. He is an associate for another apparent Jewish Trotskyite, the pro-Russian, pro-Trump Michel Chossudovsky and his Centre for Research on Globalization (GlobalReseearch.ca). Lendman hasn’t become huge, but he has been a consistent Trotskyite voice in the alt media. He was cheerleading Russia long before it became popular for the Alt Media to do so.

Lendman starts off his latest Kremlin-backed public relations piece with,

“US-led Western media reporting on Russia is consistently hostile, a disturbing near-daily tirade of disinformation, Big Lies and fake news.”

Ironic considering Jewish-led alternative media reporting on Russia is consistently favourable to the Reds, and even more disturbingly, carries out daily rants about how the Russians (Soviets) are supposedly saving the planet from the banksters and reviving Christianity and nationalism. You’d be hard-pressed to find even one major alternative media personality who criticizes Russia. Go on. I challenge you to find just one. In that same article, Lendman completely dismisses the fact of the Kremlin’s online troll farming, like that of the Internet Research Agency, which is part of the Soviet’s Perestroika psychological warfare plan, not just a division but the core basis of its intelligence apparatus.

Getting back to Lendman’s latest desinformatsiya piece, Lendman vents his seeming outrage at the “notorious Russophobic” Anne Applebaum. Gotta love the irony of Jews criticizing their fellow controlled opposition Jews, sort of like the Trotskyite-Zionist approved fake anti-communist American Jewish League Against Communism, which was largely funded by Bernard Baruch. The anti-Communist McCarthyite movement was entirely controlled by Jews—one of the reasons being to take the heat off of Jews when it came to fingering them as leading the worldwide communist conspiracy. It’s a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup. Lendman, apparently, is another fox. There are many just like him in the alternative media. Nobody seems to be deviating from the pro-Russian script. Nobody except for a few voices with not much of a platform.

Those are just some examples, but Lendman stops at nothing to portray Russia as a perfect angel and saviour of humanity. He deliberately is misleading his audience.

I did a search of Lendman’s site using the term “Perestroika Deception”, which obviously is my latest obsession, and I came across two references, but they were to only “Perestroika” and they were just brief references to Gorbachev’s public Perestroika program. You would think a man like Lendman certainly would have come across Antatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika thesis. But it’s completely absent. And for good reason. It’s the thesis that would put Lendman out of business, as well as dismantle the entire Judeo-Soviet ruse that has hypnotized the West and launched into Cold War 2.0 theatrics.

Anti-Jewish (chassidic) Stalinist era propaganda. Now that Stalinism has been purged from the crytpo-Soviet Russian state, we are seeing the re-Judaizing of Russia and ever stronger ties between Israel and Russia.

Lendman seems to believe that throwing in the odd piece about the plight of the Palestinians will legitimize his disinformation operation to the alternative media audience. He also seems to believe that blaming the U.S. government (not the true culprits in Israel and the Zionist lobby) for the 9/11 conspiracy helps him pass the Truther litmus test. So far, it has worked. Doing a cursory search, I could not find anything remotely critical of Lendman and his work. He is blindly accepted by the truther movement and promoted.

“It’s why growing thousands of Jews globally oppose an ideology based on power, conquest, dispossession, and violation of the most fundamental Jewish ethical and moral teachings, ones Zionists disdain,” Lendman writes in his seemingly anti-Zionist sympathizing with the Jews Against Zionism movement. Where can be found these Jewish “ethical and moral teachings”? Lendman doesn’t really explain. It’s difficult to pinpoint what kind of Jew Lendman is. He could be Orthodox but he could also be liberal or reform (he calls himself “progressive”).

In a review of Lendman’s works, James Petras stated,

“…Lendman’s essays are a major contribution to the struggle for social justice in America.”

Yikes.

Lendman’s apparent left-leaning defence of de-Stalinized Russia is definitely Trotskyite, in some sense. He could be part of a joint ADL-FBI COINTELPRO operation, the way the anti-Stalin communist New York Jews of the McCarthyite era were. And what does it say that the alternative media continues to give Lendman a platform?

Lendman appears to be aiding the Soviet long-range Perestroika strategy to feign Russian democratization while radicalizing and destabilizing the West. With Lendman, throw in some world war fear mongering and you have a unique psyop.

The overall plan is to lull the West to sleep about the communist threat in order to ripen it for a world communistic government takeover, with Russia leading it militarily and Israel bringing us goyim into spiritual enlightenment. The lulling involves both the Left and the Right. The plan has no loyalty to either.

The rise of the radial left (social justice, identity politics, et al) in the West is proof of Perestroika success.

Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice run by Kremlin-backed master freemason

Bogdanov in his masonic black and white (dualism) attire.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 27, 2018 Anno Domini

While the West struggles with the growing militancy of social justice in its own lands, a little known organization is bringing the movement back to where it started—Russia…if it ever left in the first place.

What more fitting than for the humanist international masonic brotherhood to be championing it. Forty-eight-year-old Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Russia (Scottish Rite) Andrei Vladimirovich Bogdanov helped found the Communist Party of Social Justice (Коммунистическая партия социальной справедливости) in 2012 (1) as a means for constructing a social state, presumably with social justice as its focus. Of course, the movement and its stated mission assume the narrative that communism and its Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s and Russia became democratized, thus the need for communism to be re-introduced in Russia.

Looking deeper, though, it turns out the entire thing is an elaborate ruse by the crypto-Soviet state to further its Perestroika deception (it’s fake collapse of communism and restructuring to democratization), as revealed by Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. (2)

Russia’s grand master mason is suspected of participating in a false opposition campaign against current Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2008 presidential election in Russia. Putin, who has been in power since 1999, has been viewed by some analysts as routinely setting up strawmen opponents in order to create the illusion of choice and free elections in Russia during his decades-long stay in power (elections require a minimum of two candidates in order to take place). All of this was predicted by Golitsyn in the 1960s and ‘80s.

Bogdanov, who previously handled public relations for Putin’s United Russia Party, denies accusations that he is a Kremlin stooge, even though he also avoids fierce criticism of Putin and praises Dmitry Medvedev (Putin’s planned successor at the time). What’s more, Bogdanov managed to garner 2 million signatures—despite only collecting 89,000 votes for his Democratic Party during the previous parliamentary election—to run as an independent candidate against Putin in the presidential election in March 2008. (3)

In 2013, the Communist Party of Social Justice won one seat in the city Parliament.

Bogdanov not only validates the claim that he is a Putin puppet in the following statement, but he simultaneously furthers the Perestroika deception, which involves a long-range strategy of weakening the West through subversion and psychological warfare.

“Democracy in Russia will be even better than in the United States within two or three, maximum five years.” (4)

The logo for Russia’s Communist Party of Social Justice.

Putin’s official opposition is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), the successor to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union (CPSU). It currently has 42 representatives in the State Duma. By contrast, Putin’s United Party has 339. The opposition’s continued existence suggests that, according to Golitsyn’s theory, Putin and his crypto-communist kahal control the opposition as a way of furthering the lie that Russia’s government is opposed to communism and is, instead, democratic. If Russia were truly democratizing, would there a be a communist party at all, much less allowed as the official opposition? You would think that after witnessing all the horrors of communism the new democratic state would have banned communism altogether.

Likewise, the seeming opposition between the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and Bogdanov’s Communist Party of Social Justice appears to be yet another dialectic—a sort of controlled opposition to the controlled opposition, with all three being in on the scam together. The CPRF supposedly has even admitted that Bogdanov’s party is backed by the Kremlin, although it feels Putin backed it in order to steal votes from CPRF. Again, this claim only feeds the Perestroika deception by making it seem that Putin doesn’t want the CPRF (the communists) to win. This is how intricate and complex Soviet strategy is. The West is entirely ignorant of this. But if they simply learned about dialectics (especially dialectics within dialectics), they would begin to understand.

“The deployment of controlled ‘political opposition’ has rendered possible the introduction of deceptive ‘non-Communist’ and ‘democratic’ structures,” warns Golitsyn. “Even so- called free elections do not present a problem for the Communist Parties. Because of their secret partnership with the ‘opposition’, the Communist Parties are always in a winning situation. It is their candidates – Communist or ‘non-Communisf -who always win. No other truly independent candidates exist.”(5)

Golitsyn detailed in his 1988 book, The Perestroika Deception, how the crypto-Soviet state actually embraces the concept of the European Union, as it will make integration between the West and Russia’s world government communistic system that more easy.

Bogdanov hints at this very concept when he told The Moscow Times in 2008, “Russia also needs to join NATO or, rather, merge with a new military block in which only European countries will participate. Russia’s integration into European institutions has been a major theme of his long-shot campaign.” (6) Is this Bogdanov’s idea? No. It comes from the Central Committee and their Perestroika psych warfare division.

Interestingly, with the knowledge that freemasonry helped establish the communist revolution in Russia, Bogdanov appears to corroborate another Golitsyn theory: that the crypto-Soviet state would make superficial concessions to the Russian Orthodox Church in order to further the perception of Russia’s democratization. Bogdanov told The Moscow Times of a church they passed by that was built by a freemason.

Logo for the #1 Harmony Grand Lodge of Moscow. Notice the rotated Jewish hexagram.

“Do you remember a church we passed on the way here, built by the architect Vasily Bazhenov? He was also a Freemason,” he said. “There are Masonic symbols inside, and legend has it that not a single piece of glass was broken there when the church was captured by the French troops and then retaken by the Russians.” (7)

Visit enough Orthodox churches and you will inevitably encounter some of these masonic symbols blasphemously implanted on the iconostasis, in other paintings, and such. Freemasonry played a leading role in the Russian Revolution, as it did in the French Revolution—working side by side with revolutionary Jews.

The masons have always liked the idea of allowing a passive Christianity to exist, so long as they are allowed to infiltrate and run it—the masons’ own false opposition system. And that’s exactly what they did following the revolutions, first with the Catholic Church and now with the Russian Orthodox Church. Both institutions are now completely in the hands of the enemy.

The Russian Orthodox Church not only has masons to contend with but Soviets as well. It is run by mostly “former” Soviet agents, with the Patriarch of Russia, the highest position, being occupied by “former” KGB agent Kirill. Putin and Kirill are both suspected of being freemasons.

This sham Russian revival of Orthodoxy and democracy has fooled the world, especially nationalists in the West. But it’s just another Judeo-masonic trick. Golitsyn said that until Western nationalists give up their failed methods of geo-political analysis, they will never catch on to how the game really works.

Notes:

1. Communist Party of Social Justice – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Social_Justice

2. The Contemplative Observer, Anatoliy Golitsyn: The Key to Understanding Today’s World Situation, Feb. 14, 2013 – https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/anatoliy-golitsyn-the-key-to-understanding-todays-world-situation/

3. Sweeney, Conor, Presidential candidate Bogdanov denies Kremlin ties, January 30, 2008, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-election-bogdanov/presidential-candidate-bogdanov-denies-kremlin-ties-idUSL2949331420080130

4. ibid

5. Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception—The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 87

6. Abdullaev, Nabi, Bogdanov Campaigns With Grandmother, Marc 6, 2008, The Moscow Times, https://web.archive.org/web/20080306090027/http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2008/02/26/003.html

7. ibid

 

Why Soviet Russia helped Trump get elected

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 20, 2018 Anno Domini

While the two sides of the Right-vs-Left partisan theatre continue to squabble over the how, when, and where of Russian collusion with the Trump presidency, the most important question—why—is ignored.

Let us consider the reasons why Putin and the “Russian federation” helped bring Trump to the Oval Office, within the context of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika deception thesis.

First, let’s assume that Golitsyn is correct that the Soviet Union still exists but with the deceptive mask of capitalism and democracy in order to lull the West to sleep over the communist threat so that Russia can later more easily take over the slumbering Western power. (“Perestroika” is Russian for restructuring. The feigned democratization of the USSR was sold to the West as “Perestroika” of the old Soviet system into a new democratized system. Golitsyn said it was a lie.)

Corroborating Golitsyn’s hundreds of predictions—which goes back to the 1950s and has a better-than-ninety-percent accuracy rate—is the simple fact that the Soviet’s cultural Marxist subversion program has completely taken over the social order in the West. In fact, it’s a completed mission. Pro-Russian conservatives seem to think that the radical Left and its identity politics evolved on its own, perhaps from the hippie movement or something. But it came from the Soviet Union—part of the subversive demoralization phase of what another Soviet defector, Yuri Bezmenov, claimed was part of a four-pronged Soviet strategy of overtaking the West and absorbing it into Lenin’s communistic world government.

With the demoralization phase already complete, we now move on to what Bezmenov described as the destabilization phase. This is where Donald Trump comes in. Here are some basic points to consider when we look at Trump’s usefulness to the crypto-Soviet state of Russia under Putin and it’s long-range goal of weakening America and the West for Soviet takeover:

  • He is more easily kompromat (compromised and controlled than Hillary, due to sexual compromise, financial and economic blackmail, Jewish-Russia mob deals, etc. Golitsyn called it “co-operation blackmail”.)
  • He has caused more social and political division domestically and, perhaps, abroad. (divide and conquer strategy).
  • He has fractured the Right (the destruction of conservatism is top priority for world communism).
  • He has discredited the Right (by shaping it into a strawman and caricature).
  • He has emboldened, strengthened, and galvanized the radical Left (sort of like how the Zionists used Hitler to galvanize all the previously divided Jews worldwide).
  • Trump is bringing America closer to the realization of world government, despite appearances of opposition to globalism (mainly through economic deals and partnerships).

There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton is a compromised and dirty politician. But so is Donald, and more so. Sexual compromise is the preferred form of blackmail in the political world and has been since the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati systematized the concept. There is no way that Hillary can outmatch Trump in this department. From Russia’s point of view, Donald is the easier to manipulate in this respect. Whether the Russians had access to Mossad’s Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmail sex ring that is likely to have ensnared Trump and/or whether the Russian “pissgate” vice has any validity, the Russians have Trump by his balls. Add to that the financial obligations Trump has to the Russian-Jewish money lenders and business and political obligations he has to the Russia-Jewish mafiya that helped him win the presidency and there is no question how compromised Donald is. The Russians knew they could have no where near the same control with Hillary.

Part of the Soviet destabilization plan, outlined by both Golitsyn and Bezmenov, is to radicalize both sides of social discourse in America and the West. Golitsyn said this in the 1980s, yet we have really only seen it reach a head in the last three years. Was Golitsyn psychic? No, he just knew Soviet strategy and made the simple prediction based on this knowledge. It has now come out that Russian troll farms were promoting extreme points of view from both Right and Left perspectives, especially identity politics, in a provokatsiya (provocation) program, which is an essential part of their massive psychological warfare program. It would be one thing if the troll farms were only promoting right-wing politics, but that they were promoting both corroborates the claims of the two aforementioned Soviet defectors. It shows the real cards of Putin and Russia, who are not out to revitalize conservatism, Christian Orthodoxy, and not out to fight globalism. They are there to destabilize the West so that they can ripen it for the final world government takeover. Trump is also causing political divisions with his seeming protectionist policies, despite brokering scantly publicized partnerships and deals with nations, including and especially China. What’s more, his unfettered support of the illegal state of Israel is causing even more political divisions.

The Trump hysteria has fractured the Right. This is obvious. Perhaps there has never been more in-fighting and internal division in the conservative movement than now. This has been seen even inside of Trump’s own political party, the GOP. The plethora of controlled opposition agents (many Russian sponsored) inside the conservative movement is only amplifying this division, as they are promoting bankrupt forms of conservatism, or neoconservatism, which just further muddies the water. Of course, Trump’s brand of conservatism is fake, too. It’s no more real than a three-dollar bill.

Trump’s over-the-top behaviour and persona makes a convenient caricature out of conservatism. It has provided a rallying point around which Leftists can punch holes in an easily deflatable strawman blow-up clown doll. This is only possible because Trump does not embody genuine conservative values. He is the creature of New York, Jewish yuppy culture and is led by his lust, greed, and narcissism. This caricaturization is being used the same way the Zionists used the caricature of Hitler to galvanize the fractured Jewish community. It lead to to an intense period of cohesion for Hitler’s opponents, while he and the Nazis became more and more discredited. The Hitler caricature also enabled the Jewish money power to inoculate the world against any return to nationalism, which is the natural opponent of communism (and Zionism). The Soviets strive for the same goals, despite pretending to be nationalists themselves. Do you think the world will ever look at conservatism and nationalism with any validity, in the post-Hitler, Post-Trump future?

The fracturing, discrediting, and caricaturization of the Right has only encouraged the Left that their ideologies are correct. They can now push forward implementing their “truth” all over the world—more easily than had caricatures like Trump never been in power. Now there is the convenient pretext to save the world from any more monsters. Just accept their communism. Everything will be fine. We will finally have peace. Bezmenov illustrated that once the demoralization and destabilization phases had passed, a violent economic and political crisis would evolve. It would eventually lead to a normalization period of stability until the following cycle would reach a crisis point (dialectics).

Trump is merely part of a long-range Soviet strategy to take over the West and eventually absorb it into a world communistic system. This has been a long-time goal for world Jewry. It began, in its modern form, during the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia. So far, everything is going according to the Judeo-Soviet script. It’s just taken a little longer to implement than the Jewish revolutionaries had envisioned.

Putin Dossier

Exposing Russian president Vladimir Putin and his crypto-Soviet state for the Judeo-masonic, Chabad mafiya collaborators that they are.

Check regularly for updates.

Sexual blackmail?

Murdered spy claimed Putin was caught on film having sex with boys

How boy, five, described tummy kiss that sparked Putin paedophile claims – as Russian president said ‘I wanted to stroke him like a kitten’

Litvinenko claimed Putin was the ‘Kremlin paedophile’ in blog post months before his death after Russian president was pictured kissing stomach of a young boy

Putin: ‘A rejection of anti-Semitism and all forms of xenophobia and international enmity is what brings Russia and Israel together’

Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn: The Key to Understanding Today’s World Situation

Israeli PM Netanyahu and Russian President Putin at Jewish Museum in Moscow

Why Israel allows Russia to ‘protect’ Assad

The Secret Behind Putin’s Love For Chabad

Russia controls Reddit’s political and conspiracy narratives on Trump and Clinton

The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration and Manipulation

The Perestroika Deception: Russia’s fake democratization, according to Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn (PDF)

We will soon achieve COMMUNISM! – Putin

Jewish roots of Russian president Vladimir Putin

The Perestroika Deception according to Christopher Story: Russia is false opposition to the NWO

Communism Alive and Menacing, KGB Defector Claims

Russia prevents Iran from setting up base in Syria, Israel welcomes the move

‘Putin is recreating the Soviet Union as he thinks it should have been,’ says Natan Sharansky’s former Hebrew teacher, ‘without the anti-Semitism’

InfoWars’ Alex Jones Stole Over 1,000 Articles From Kremlin-Backed Russia Today

Jewish-Russian oligarch and GOP donor Len Blavatnik is a Chabadnik

GOP campaigns took $7.35 million from Jewish oligarch linked to Russia

Judeo-Islamic alliance: Putin says Moscow’s new mosque is the largest in Europe

Series:

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part I

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part II

Russia’s Jewish mafiya Chabad Lubavitch – Part III

Putin’s Jewish embrace: Is it love or politics?

Technocracy: Run by Israel, Russia, China (Operation TALPIOT)

Bilderberg 2018 In Italy – More Russian Connections Than Trump

Putin Grants Netanyahu Schindler’s Letter During Meeting in Moscow

Holocaust Deniers in Russia Now Face Five Years in Prison

Putin’s initiative: Russia outlaws distorted, anti-Semitic interpretation of the Bible

Netanyahu to fly to Moscow on Monday for snap meeting with Putin

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill Praises Dead Communist, Atheist Dictator

Russia-linked Twitter accounts are working overtime to help Devin Nunes and WikiLeaks

The Chaos Computer Club’s Past Links to the KGB and Present Links to WikiLeaks, Assange, and Snowden

Putin Welcomes Kissinger: ‘Old Friends’ to Talk Shop

Russia Hires Goldman Sachs as Corporate Broker to Boost Image

Goldman Sachs | Russia

How Russia Created a Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center Even Vladimir Putin Can Tolerate | ‘Putin was so moved by this idea that he donated one month of his salary toward the creation of the museum’

The Happy-Go-Lucky Jewish Group That Connects Trump and Putin

At Putin’s side, an army of Jewish billionaires

Israel’s former Soviet immigrants transform adopted country

Israel and Russia are NOT on the verge of war. They are allies!

Does anyone still seriously think that Russia and Israel aren’t allies | Israel’s latest bombing raid on Syria is confirmation that the Putin-Netanyahu Summit in Sochi was a lot more successful than some Alt-Media voices have led people to believe

How Putin’s Man Made His Way to the Top of European Jewry

 

Screen capture from Oliver Stone’s 2017 series The Putin Interviews where Putin plays his true Jewish card of ridiculing anti-Jews.

Russia to invest billions of dollars in Saudi Arabia’s future megacity

Russia, Iraq: Rosneft Pays Kurdistan $1.3 Billion Advance

Rosneft Expands in Middle East With Libya and Iraq Oil Deals

Russia and IMF agree on new economic plan (like Lenin’s NEP!)

Russia: Ukraine should seek bailout loan from IMF

The IMF Bows to Putin in Ukraine

The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a member of Rothschilds’ Bank for International Settlements

As Putin Becomes One of World’s Most Powerful Players, His Surprising Jewish Connection is Revealed

9/11 conspiracy complicity:

“Claims that the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 were orchestrated by US intelligence agencies are “complete nonsense,” Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told attendees of a youth forum”

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said his country warned the United States several times that Saddam Hussein’s regime was planning terror attacks on the United States and its overseas interests”

“Putin, who had been the first to call Bush with his sympathy after learning of the 9/11 attacks, graciously offered to help with the invasion of Afghanistan”

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s political party, “Yadinaya Rasiya” (United Russia), will open a branch in Israel, marking the first time ever that a Russian party will have an official mission in the country

Putin: ‘I support the struggle of Israel’

Russian Missile Sale to Iran Involves Unseen Deals With Israel

Putin’s Double Game in Syria: Russian-Israeli Cooperation

Why Russia should take over Israel’s defense from America

Putin gives Jewish War book to Netanyahu as a present

Putin’s Favorite Rabbi

Senior Russian Rabbi Says Putin’s Ouster Would Endanger Jews

The American Jews Who Are Proud to Be Pro-Putin

Putin on our side, says Russia’s chief rabbi | Russian chief rabbi Berel Lazar tells Limmud FSU that Putin has done more for Jews than any other leader of the country

Meeting with Chief Rabbi of Russia Berel Lazar and President of the Federation of Jewish Communities Alexander Boroda

Technocracy/Smart Grid/Operation TALPIOT:

 Operation Talpiot – Key to Understanding Israeli Power 

Artificial intelligence is not only the future of Russia, but the future of all mankind. It holds both tremendous opportunities and is fraught with scarcely predictable dangers. Whoever takes the lead in this sphere will become Lord of the World,” President Putin told Russian schoolchildren

Russian spy claims he was poisoned just like Sergei Skripal as Vladimir Putin wants him dead

Photographic Proof the USSR Still Exists

Russia’s Pre-World War III Propaganda: Not for the Fainthearted

Jerome Corsi & the alt-right’s Russian hackers

Putin: Just another Jewish oligarch

Jewish puppet Putin

Putin, Oligarchy and Alt-Media Delusion

Putin: I’ve always liked communist and socialist ideals

Russia, China, India Call for NEW WORLD ORDER!

The Unsolved Mystery Behind the Act of Terror That Brought Putin to Power

Chechen Terrorism: Made in Moscow

Boston Bombing: Latest Globalist Pretext for U.S.-Russia Convergence

Putin, Poison, and Murder

Brendon O’Connell – Syria, Russia & Iran are Not the “Good Guys”

The Putin-Netanyahu bromance

The 9 Russian Words That Explain KremlinGate

Putin not remotely anti-Semitic, says Russia’s chief rabbi

Israel’s former Soviet immigrants transform adopted country

How Russia’s rich elite spend their billions in London

Russian-Chinese Military Blackmail: Accept Communism or Face World War III

Israel dumping the U.S. for Russia (did it ever really break up with Russia in the first place?)

Russian President Vladimir Putin (C) listens to Russia’s Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar (L) during his visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Centre in Moscow February 19, 2013. (photo credit: SPUTNIK PHOTO AGENCY / REUTERS)

Russia’s kosher kingpin launches halal meat empire

Remnant ROCOR: Russia did not abandon communism

Communist Paper Questions Putin’s Orthodoxy

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

A Zionist Spy for Soviet Intelligence

Facebook was using Kaspersky Lab until last year to scan people’s computers – Russia reportedly exploited Kaspersky’s antivirus software to trawl US government systems for classified data

The Kremlin turns priests into obedient “comrades”

Russia’s Communist-sponsored newspaper Pravda endorses hoax theory of Boston bombing, but why? Was Russia behind the theory itself?

Russia is arming the Taliban in Afghanistan, US General says

Syria is a Communist/Soviet satellite

Facebook gave data about 57 billion friendships to Russian-Jewish academic

The Oliver North of RussiaGate

Oleg the Oligarch

Confirmed: Russian Patriarch Worked with KGB

Jacob Rothschild brokers historic deal between Russia and Israel to share digitised Gunzburg Collection

The KGB “Fake News” Narrative & Hypocrisy of the Alt-Right & Libertarian Media

Putin Visits Former KGB Boss

Reditt: A deep dive into content posted by 944 accounts run out of Russia’s IRA

Julian Assange Confirmed as Kremlin Stooge

Martinez & Bjerknes Unmask the Putin Cult

O’Connell: Russian Church Leader Is A Common Thief, Charlatan, KGB Agent

The Propaganda Tools Used by Russians to Influence the 2016 Election

Putin’s initiative: Russia outlaws distorted, anti-Semitic interpretation of the Bible

Russia Today distributed worldwide through Israeli company

Russia outlaws questioning official narrative on Holocaust but claims real Ukrainian holocaust is a hoax invented by West

‘Controlled nationalism’: How the Kremlin destroyed the far right in Russia, while backing it in the West

Rothschild bucking trend, contemplates new hires in Russia

Hysteria over Jade Helm conspiracy theories was fueled by Russians, former CIA director says

The diagram connecting Putin, Rothschild, and Rockefeller

Bibi & Putin Attend Parade “Over Nazi Victory” & Red Army Memorial

RT WW2 Propaganda – “Soviets Were The Good Guys”

Understanding provokatsiya

Soviet Coup Attempt Was A Fake

President Putin On Israel: Quotes From The Kremlin Website

Brexit’s secret Putin connection: Nigel Farage’s bankroller met Russian envoy three times then hooked him up with Trump’s team, as MI5 is urged to act

In Syria, Putin and Netanyahu Were on the Same Side All Along

Chronicle of a murder bid foretold: exiled KGB chief fights for life in London hospital

Former Mossad agent, Juval Aviv, says the Mossad is an old Russian intelligence school

The Russian Roots of ISIS

5 Myths: Russia’s False ISIS Narrative In Syria

Stalin & Secret Diaries: “Soviet Involvement in the Creation of the State of Israel”

Putin’s Graveyard: The Men and Women Vladimir Putin Has Had Assassinated

Rothschild-connected Russian National Charged in Conspiracy to Act as an Agent of the Russian Federation Within the United States

Israeli support for anti-Ukrainian separatists of “Novorussia”

Vladimir Putin inherits apartment in downtown Tel Aviv, Israel

Abramovich is latest Russian oligarch to move to Israel

US Treasury’s ‘Putin list’ features Jewish billionaires

After East Germany Fell, I Considered Escaping to Israel’

Top Israeli officials were part of KGB spy ring — report

Know Your Oligarch: A Guide to the Jewish Billionaires in the Trump-Russia Probe

Ilya Ehrenburg Jewish communist gave leaflets to Red Army telling them to kill Germans & invented 6 million figure

O’Connell Commentary: Top Israeli officials were part of KGB spy ring

‘Putin Loves Israel, loves Bi Bi,’ Trump admits on Fox News

Putin’s crypto-Soviet Russian Federation oppresses authentic nationalism

Political Islam, Migrant Crime, Terror Cells Challenge Putin Claims of ‘Great White Hope’

Bronfman and the Mafia Sell Out the United States to Russia

NATO Chief Jens Stoltenberg And His Top-Secret KGB Past

‘The story of Soviet agent Guy Burgess and his generation may foretell the path of today’s Isis recruits’

Soviet Trans-humanism: Billionaire Dmitry Itskov seeks ‘immortality’ by uploading his brain to a computer

FSB Director Admits Russians Fighting for ISIS

Red Cocaine: The role of communist nations in the rise of drug use in western countries (PDF)

Roswell UFO crash ‘was Soviet plot to create US panic’ (and UFO paranoia, no doubt)

Putin’s Stasi ID card found in Dresden archive

Russia Insider is a Kremlin honeypot

‘Controlled Opposition’—
The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration & Manipulation

 

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 64-66

The early 20th century so-called “Trust” model utilized by the Soviet Union to infiltrate and destroy its enemies is the foundation for the very techniques often used both by American intelligence agencies—along with Israel’s clandestine service, Mossad and its conduits such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith—to infiltrate and destroy (or otherwise control the activities of) domestic dissident movements deemed hostile to the interests of Zionism and Globalism.

Those who fail to understand this age-old tactic will never be able to fathom the extent to which the American political system has been manipulated by these alien forces.

Although—even today—there are persons and organizations active within the so-called “nationalist” and “revisionist” and “patriotic” movements in America, who seem to “say the right things,” the truth is that many of those in question are actually witting—sometimes unwitting— agents of discord, being used for the purposes of intelligence gathering, propaganda and disinformation, all designed to establish further influence upon the American system for the purpose of consolidating the power of The Enemy Within.

Let us examine the Soviet “Trust” and how it operated.This little- known counterintelligence operation known as “the Trust” was established by the Cheka, the predecessor to the Soviet KGB, as a means through which to set up and control a “phony opposition” in order to flush out genuine opponents of the Bolshevik regime which, as historians know, was under the control of non-Russians—mostly Jews.

When reading the following materials relating to the workings of the “Trust,” simply substitute the word “Israeli” for the word “Soviet” and the word “Mossad” for the names “Cheka” and “KGB” and you will under- stand how the “Trust” technique has been applied by the Mossad, in manipulating groups that “seem” to be opposing Israeli interests. (Likewise, a similar formula can be used substituting the terms “CIA” or “FBI” as it may be appropriate.)

A brief description of the operation of “The Trust” appears in Chekisty: A History of the KGB by John J. Dziak:

“Where no genuine internal opposition organization exists [a security service might] invent one—both to infiltrate the more dangerous . . . organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions, and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests. ”

A more comprehensive account of “The Trust” appears in Dirty Tricks or Trump Cards: U.S. Covert Action and Counterintelligence, by Georgetown University Professor Roy Godson who is known for his close ties to the Israeli lobby in Washington:

“Sometimes, if circumstances allow and the practitioners are skillful, counterintelligence can target its deception not only at the internal and emigre opposition but also at the intelligence services and governments of foreign adversaries.The Soviet Trust was such an operation.

The Trust was created in the early 1920s and completely controlled by the Soviet secret service, the Cheka. Believing they were operating in league with an active and effective anti-Bolshevik movement, opponents of the regime within the USSR and in exile were lured by the Trust into exposing themselves and became targets of Soviet state security.

Using that information and controlling communications between Western intelligence agencies, the Russian emigre community, and Russian dissidents inside the country, the Cheka expertly neutralized anti-Communist opposition at home and abroad.

The Trust was also able to use its contacts with Western intelligence services to pass along misleading and false information on the internal state of the Soviet regime to those same services’ foreign ministries and governments. Essentially, the West was being told by its intelligence “assets” within the Soviet Union that support for the Bolshevik regime was weakening, and that the Soviet leaders were at heart nationalists who, if left in peace by the West, would gradually turn a state dedicated to revolution at home and abroad into one that would behave in a more traditional and predictable fashion . . .

The organization’s actual name was the Moscow Municipal Credit Association—thus, the Trust. It posed as a financial institution operating within the liberal economic environment of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. The bogus group’s clandestine name was the Monarchist Association of Central Russia. One ironic aspect of the Trust operation was that British and French intelligence services were paying the Russian emigres for the disinformation being supplied them by the Cheka through the Trust.Allegedly, at one point, money paid to these sources by the West was used to cover the expenses of the deception operation itself. In short, the West was paying to be deceived . . .

Given the fact that several generations of young KGB officers were shown that Trust operations were successful, it is not surprising that such operations were continued from the 1920s to the 1980s.”

The “Trust” model for infiltration has been applied by the Mossad and its allies in the CIA and the FBI in this country to other dissident movements targeted for infiltration and take-over. Intelligence units such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are often part of the operation.

Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which “dissident” groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats. The ADL and SPLC give a big “build- up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility.” In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization, that is some- how “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evidenced by the ADL or SPLC attacks.Those who affiliate themselves with such “trust” operations do so at their own risk.

In the pages of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within we will learn much more about the actions of Soviet-style “Trust” intrigues on American soil.We will name those who lead phony opposition groups. We will demonstrate that there has been a concerted effort to control— or destroy—genuine grass-roots American political opposition that threatens the power of Zionism and its (often-uneasy) allies in the glob- al corporate elite.We will meet some of the more infamous media shills who use their influence to defame those who stand in the way of the internationalist agenda. We will survey the way in which traditional American political movements have been infiltrated and taken over, subverted in their otherwise pro-American agenda.

None of this is going to be a pleasant story as it unfolds, but it is a story that must be told if Americans are going to reclaim their nation and their heritage….