Soviet dialectics & predictive power

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
Excerpt from The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 26-27 (1998 edition)
June 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Correct understanding of the strategy and the application of that understanding to the analysis of events enables one to predict otherwise surprising Soviet actions. Since the strategy is long-range, it has several phases. The strategists plan their actions in the early phases in preparation for the final phase. They conceive Soviet reforms in the initial phase, they rehearse them in the preparatory phase and they introduce them in the final phase. Because of this planning framework, the strategy has its own dialectic. It has its thesis – the Stalinist regime: its antithesis – criticism and rejection of the Stalinist regime: and its synthesis – a new, reformed model which ‘perestroika’ is designed to create, and which will be the product of ‘convergence’ (the joining of the two opposites). Understanding the dialectic and logic of the strategy is crucial for prediction: it enables one to see how the situation in one phase will develop in the next phase.

For instance, it enables one to predict the change in the role and status of Soviet ‘dissidents’. In the initial phase, they were recruited and trained by the KGB. In the preparatory phase, they were ‘criticised’ and ‘persecuted’ by the KGB. In the final phase, they are accepted and even incorporated into ‘perestroika’. It was through understanding this dialectic that the Author was able to predict the simple fact that Sakharov ‘might be included in some capacity in government’. In the event, he became one of Gorbachev’s chief advisers.

Likewise, the dialectic enables one to understand that Euro-Communist criticism in the 1960s and 1970s of repressive practices and violations of human rights in the USSR was undertaken and tolerated with official foreknowledge of the impending ‘reform’ of the Soviet system. The fact that the Berlin Wall was built at the time when the strategy was adopted was a sufficient basis for the prediction that it would be pulled down again in the strategy’s final phase. The dialectic enables one to see through the calculated publication of anti-Soviet manuscripts abroad, Soviet condem- nation of them at the time and the present lifting of the ban on much of the ‘dissident’ writing of the 1960s and 1970s. Understanding of the dialectic enables one to provide further predictions and warnings about political and social issues which the Soviet strategists will seek to exploit in Western Europe, the United States and elsewhere.

The Left has completely hijacked logical fallacy inquiry

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 21, 2019

Research logical fallacies and you will find a plethora of lists and descriptions that all seem to share a similar narrative.

You will find long and short lists of common and uncommon fallacies (illogical arguments) as well as examples of contemporary and past uses of these fallacies. But whether it’s from academia, its closely allied skeptics movement, or from people calling themselves “rational”, the lists and examples tend to share the same narrative.: Right wingers, the religious, and traditionalists—or anyone who Leftists hate—are all illogical, bigoted idiots who should be ignored.

This problem wouldn’t be so bad if one could find a genuinely ideologically neutral source, but it seems next to impossible. Whether the search engines have been manipulated to produce these results and/or non-Leftists are simply not talking about logical fallacies is anyone’s guess. It seems to be a combination of the two. What one could find through search engines 10-20 years ago was a lot more than one finds today. Non-leftists are typically very logical thinking people, but they don’t seem to be engaged in this kind of debate or they may not be aware that their logical thinking has been systematized and put down on paper (as would be the case with the logically thinking but formally uneducated).

Had the Right been more aware, they would have seen that today’s definitions and examples used for the ancient school of logic has been re-organized by the world scientific dictatorship with its Leftist bias. They would have seen and laughed at the Left presenting itself as the sole arbiter of “logic” and morally justified opponents of logically fallacious idiot right wingers.

In reality, the opposite seems true. Academicians and their bedfellow skeptics movement Marxists are themselves guilty of consistently employing logical fallacies. Their worldview is largely based in anti-logic (anti-Logos); their use for logical fallacy inquiry, then, is really only to keep young rank-and-file Lefties from discovering true logic (through distortion of the definitions), as well as to keep the Right from figuring out their deceptive games (prevent the Right from learning about the trappings of logical fallacies). Therefore, by monopolizing this form of inquiry, they can further gatekeep for the Left, thereby maintaing their academic and societal supremacy. They get to control almost all public discourse. Double agent Jordan Peterson recently cemented this absolute public dominance when he declared that European ethno-nationalists ought to be excluded from any discussions.

Forget about historical inquiry about the alleged happenings during the “Holocaust”, because that would be Holocaust denial (appeal to ridicule, appeal to pity, ad hominem, no discussion, narrative fallacy, non-recognition, playing on emotion, reductio ad Hitlerum). Forget about challenging academia and the media’s eschatological fallacies regarding the doomed environment and climate change, for that would be climate denial (appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion, reductionism, Big Lie technique). Don’t ever criticize Israel or Jewish behaviour, for that would be a classic case of vicious anti-Semitism (name calling, appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion). While you’re at it, don’t talk about the freemasons, dangers of vaccines, or world government, because that would just mean that you are one of those conspiracy theorists (name calling, appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion).

As you can see from these brief examples, nobody is more guilty than the Left is of employing deceptive, fallacious arguments, especially the so called skeptics movement (they are some of the biggest hypocrites in this respect). Yet the media and academia portray the opposite (gaslighting!). With the Left’s “Holocaust denier” fallacy alone, I found at least eight appropriate categories involved in the Left’s dismissal of Holocaust inquiry. Check them out, but just beware of the source and the wording of the carefully crafted descriptions. 

One of the most common fallacies of the Leftist Logical Fallacy Police (LLFPD) is to misrepresent arguments from those on the Right (strawman fallacy). They also frequently use the “fallacy fallacy”, which is when it is assumed that just because someone presents a fallacious argument, their entire position is automatically wrong, when it could simply be that they just haven’t adequately argued their position. This happens with the Right because the Left is typically more formally educated. A Leftist can academically dismiss a fallacious argument presented by a Right winger and resort to a state of cognitive dissonance (thereby re-affirming his Leftist worldview), even though the Right winger’s position is actually true. This is unfortunate.

The LLFPD favours Jews in that they dismiss any and all criticism of Jews as a collective group under the guise of the scapegoating fallacy. While this is a real and legitimate fallacy, it’s most often falsely attributed to critics of Jews. Sure, some people who know nothing about the Jewish question will callously blame Jews for things. But authentic critics will provide solid arguments that demonstrate the cause and effects of collective Jewish behaviour.

Eventually, knowledge of logical fallacies—and logic in general—will become so distorted that it will be meaningless. You can already see this trajectory with the way the Left has reclassified and reworded the definitions and examples. Orwell’s post-truth 1984 seems all the more likely.

Galileo Gambits: Trump, Putin, & Pizzagate

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 1, 2019

The most common defense of Donald Trump as an anti-globalist, conservative swamp drainer is that he must be authentic because of how much the media and the establishment are perceived as hating and vilifying him.

Not only is this defense false, given the overwhelming weight of evidence to the contrary, it’s a fallacious argument to start with.

It’s called the “Galileo Gambit” fallacy.

“The Galileo gambit (also Galileo fallacy) is a logical fallacy that asserts that if your ideas provoke the establishment to vilify or threaten you, you must be right. Users of the fallacy are to be understood as being essentially ‘Galileo wannabes’.”

Trump’s Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevist handlers know this fallacy well and have used it in building up the Cult of Trump—enough that it won him the title of President of the United States. It was none other than a globalist who first put out the lie that Trump was an “outsider” who “couldn’t be bought”. One Newt Gingrich, as if you couldn’t find a swampier spokesman to shill for you. After Gingrich’s opener for Chump, the Cult of Trump base simply expanded on and amplified the fallacious meme, turning Trump into one of the most successful psyops ever foisted on the American people. The more the media attacked Trump in the lead up to the U.S. presidential election, the more convinced his base became of his legitimacy, regardless of the facts.

“This logic is obviously flawed. For example, consider a horribly-oppressed ideology: Wahhabism. Western governments seek to persecute and censor Wahhabists at every opportunity. Does this mean that Wahhabism is correct?”

The Trump defense also falls under the associated fallacy known as Argumentum ad martyrdom—the notion that something becomes true if the person asserting it is perceived to be hated for it and/or that perceived martyrdom is proof that the martyr was correct. 

The Trump psyop also entails a bit of the hostile media effect.

Clearly, all the negative publicity helped Trump more than it hindered him during the election, whether the media knew it or not (I am convinced they were in on the charade). The negative publicity still helps Trump today, simultaneously keeping people tuned into the mind-controlling round-the-clock news in both the mainstream and in the alternative spheres.

This Galileo defense is more commonly used when fellow conservatives are challenging Trump supporters as to their blind allegiance to Chump’s cult of personality. The Chump base has other bags of tricks for Leftist critiquing of their supreme leader, namely dirty tricks like “Pizzagate”. Incidentally, the KGB-Team Trump co-ordination of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory was also validated by his base because of belief in the Galileo gambit fallacy. When some online outlets began censoring the obviously defamatory elements of “Pizzagate”, Trump’s base took it as proof that there was truth to it—all of it, no matter how ridiculous it was.

Trump supporters seem to revert to a state of cognitive dissonance when confronted with the irrationality of their Galileo gambitting. They attack their opponents and run and hide to their echo chambers, which are lovingly padded by double-agent “alternative” media charlatans like Infowars and Zerohedge. It’s no wonder they don’t learn. Their delusions are only fed by the gatekeeper alternative media. Alex Jones’ hypnotic and repetitious meme of “When you’re over the target, you take the most flak” is an explicit example of the Galileo gambit at work. He is another beneficiary of this fallacy and is also heavily involved with the promotion of both Putin and Trump.

These same Trumpists use the exact same fallacy when appraising Russian President Vladimir Putin and the actions of the Kremlin. If the Leftist Western media hates him so much, they argue, he must be the real deal. If the media blames Russia for colluding to hack the election, it must mean that Russia didn’t. Furthermore, it must mean that Russia is the good guy, and an anti-globalist to boot, the rhetoric goes (see this article arguing that the Left’s critique of Russia actually helps Russia). In effect, this dupes are leading the media dictate their analysis of world events, albeit a reactionary response. They don’t seem to grasp that there are constant dialectics at work in media narratives. The social engineers know that the media can control people not only by going along with media narratives but also by contrary reactions to media narratives. This is exactly what has happened with Trump and Putin.

The Putin-Chump cucks live in a make-believe world. Anything the two globalist stooges do is insulated against any valid arguments simply because the Galileo gambit has their base completely deceived and hardwired in to a pre-fabricated narrative. We live in a post-truth era where reason and logic are ignored and lies and memes are king.

Fatima and the Soviet merger of Orthodoxy with Catholicism

ROC “Patriarch” Kirill and “Pope” Francis. Heretics embrace.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 22, 2019 Anno Domini

There are major theological and geopolitical inconsistencies presented by the alleged prophetic Marian apparition at Fatima in the early 20th century.

The much-touted apparition, which seems to be accepted as authentic by the Vatican and is highly touted in the traditional Catholic movement, tends towards not only private interpretation but also millenarianism (an earthly kingdom)—both of which are anathema to both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Before I go on, let me first point out that I am a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy, so I have no dog in this fight when I say that the Fatima prophecies are actually anti-Catholic. Furthermore, my eschatological position is that of the majority of the Church Fathers, which is a post- or amillennial view based in some type of Preterism, perhaps partial Preterism. This is important to note, because the Fatima prophecies tend towards a futurist and even pre-millennial view—inconsistent with the majority view of the Fathers. In fact, Fatima’s eschatology is more consistent with Protestantism and millennarianist philo-Semitism, perhaps similar to that of the Puritans and Hussites, for example. Millenarianism is a sort of Earthly messianic expectation in the spirit of racially supremacist Jews.

The timing of Fatima is very suspicious—the same year of Lenin’s anti-Christ October Revolution in Russia (1917) and Europe. But more on that later.

Russia’s false conversion, false consecration

The major red flag with the prophecies is its prediction that the Russian empire will come back to the Catholic faith in the near future. First, it presupposes a continuation of Christ’s millennial reign on Earth (One thousand years of the Church’s rule, be it through Rome or Byzantium), even though it is clearly already at an end.  Second, it requires that Russia will either completely abandon Eastern Orthodoxy or modify Eastern Orthodoxy to fit in with Roman Catholicsm (and vice versa)—the latter of which is currently happening through ecumenism. Last but not least, Russia’s current perceived shift to the Right seems to corroborate the Fatima’ prophecy of the consecration of Russia. Why, Russia could only be consecrated if it finally abandoned its Godless communism, and that supposedly happened in the 1990s. In reality, Russia is merely feigning a turn to the Right as part of its old Leninist strategy of leading its opposition, namely conservatives/Christians/nationalists, into a trap.  To lure them into this trap, the Soviets must pretend to be like their opponents. Russia is still communist, although it is a much more developed and chameleonic collectivism, which is spreading to each corner of the world. Therefore, Fatima could not be fulfilled by a fake consecration.


Russia to heal Great Schism, create world religion?

Vladimir Putin hints at one world religion during September speech praising Russia’s multi-culturalism.

During the Revolution, a big part of the Leninist strategy was to infiltrate and control not only the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) at home but also the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) abroad. The former was achieved in 1918 with the ousting of St. Tikhon, the latter achieved with the communist Judeo-masonic subversion of the Vatican no later than the 1960s, culminating in the anti-Christ Second Vatican Council. However, the communists learned that since “the gates of hell will not prevail” against Christ’s Church (they couldn’t eradicate altogether Christianity from the hearts of all of the Russian people), they would have to infiltrate it, instead of trying to destroy it. With both Churches already under Soviet, Cultural Marxist control by the end of the 1960s, the next step in the Soviet plan was to unite the two Churches—something I imagine we will eventually see soon. What’s more, it appears the following step in this Soviet plan involves creating a world religion (this is consistent with New Age-Jewish messianism/millennarianism), likely to be based in Jerusalem, home to Jewish, Christian, and Muslim shrines. Today, Russia is home to large amounts of devotees to all three faiths, and has been promoting multiculturalism and inter-faith dialogue since the Revolution began. Russia is still very much a philo-Semitic, philo-Islamic nation. Russia has the largest Muslim population in all of Europe and is still run by mainly Jewish oligarchs and mobsters. Unfortunately, it seems that the great majority of Christians in Russia identify as such out of tradition and nationalism, not so much out of sincere belief. While the Church may appear to be growing in Russia, it is a shallow, false revival based in a revived National Bolshevism. Indeed, true Russian Orthodox authorities warned their flocks that the Soviets would, in the future, build grand churches with which to deceive the masses.


Fatima’s carnal message

Instead of looking to Christ’s superior, spiritual Kingdom, which is here with us now, these sincere yet misguided traditional Catholics take seriously this Fatima consecration of Russia and look to a future Earthly kingdom where Russia and, presumably, the world are consecrated to the RCC and peace is brought in.

“In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world,” reads the end of the so-called second secret of Fatima.

Wow! That’s a rather convenient narrative if your Vladimir Lenin in 1917 looking for a way to fool the Catholic world (the majority in Christendom in terms of numbers) into accepting that Russia’s chameleonic communism is a return to God. Theologically speaking, Fatima’s message is outright Protestantism. True Catholicism has never been millenarianist, nor has it given credence to such fantastical privately interpreted visions. This alleged message from the Holy Mother suggests a restoration of the Church on Earth, despite that the Book of Revelation says basically the opposite would happen following Christ’s one thousand-year reign on Earth (the Church age).

Revelation 20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

Revelation 20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

Rev 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,

It seems to say that following the Church Age, Satan would be unleashed for a short time to deceive the world, leading to a great apostasy before the final judgment. We appear to be in this phase right now. So instead of some imagined revival, we can only expect to slide further and further into apostasy before the final judgment. Revelation carries a harsh warning to anyone who would add or take away even one word from the Holy Scriptures. Does Fatima violate this? It appears so. Fatimists are so dedicated to the Fatima message, they seem to hold it on the same level of authority as the Scriptures and Tradition.

The geopolitical inconsistency with Fatima is perhaps even more pronounced. Today, the world is on a terrible and colossal slide into full-fledged apostasy. The momentum is such that it’s hard to believe any God-fearing person could honestly think that a turning point were right around the corner. This fatal error is likely also responsible for the seemingly traditional Catholic support for Putinist Russia and its crypto-Soviet expansion and destruction of Western Civilization. Tainted with the pro-Russian sentiment inherent in the Fatima prophecy, traditional Catholics can only view world events from a pro-Russia view. Thus, if and when Russia and its current Eurasianist agenda succeed in overthrowing the West and the entire world, are tradcats going to believe this will be Christ’s rule on Earth, the time of peace Fatima said it would be? Are they being set up to accept the anti-Christ world religon? We have countless Soviet defectors corroborating the narrative that the Soviets feigned the collapse of communism and are feigning a return to Christianity and conservatism.

Hijacked Vatican brought Fatima’s message to the world

Tradcats also need to realize that it was the Judeo-masonic, communist-infiltrated post-Vatican-II-occupied Holy See that brought these alleged secrets of Fatima to the world. If the secrets were authentic, one would think that anti-Christ Vatican II church would go to any length to suppress these secrets. The logic just doesn’t follow.

There is controversy over whether the third secret was fully disclosed by the Vatican (in the year 2000), and all kinds of speculation surrounds what the complete secret says, one of which is that it spoke of the RCC being infiltrated and becoming the throne of anti-Christ. Well, if this is true, we don’t really need this missing part of the third secret, because it is already very obvious that the RCC, and much of Eastern Orthodoxy, have been hijacked by anti-Christs. Again, Revelation warned that instead of a revival of the Church, she would go into apostasy leading up to the final judgment. Furthermore, the Holy Scriptures seem to suggest that before the final judgment, there would remain only a remnant of the true Church. These revelations appear to be coming true right before our very eyes, as in both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, there are only remnants staying true to the faith and tradition. In the RCC, we have tradcats, sedevacantists, etc. In Eastern Orthodoxy, we have the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA) and individual parishes throughout the Eparchy staying true to tradition. But none of these, unfortunately, make up the majority of the Churches today. They are mere remnants.

Now, if Fatima is indeed a communist ruse to fool tradcats, where does it lead? It can only lead to a re-unified Church, where there is a pseudo healing of the Great Schism between the RCC and Eastern Orthodoxy. Interestingly in Eastern Orthodoxy, some remnant believers and Saints have already warned that the Bolsheviks would one day appear to restore Russian Orthodoxy and rebuild these magnificent churches but that it would all be for show. Indeed, we now know that Leninist and Stalinist strategy involved giving concessions to the ROC. In fact, after the death of St. Tikhon—the last true Patriarch of the ROC, the Bolsheviks put in one of their own as the head of the ROC. This line of succession of impostor patriarchs continues to this day, with “Patriarch” Kirill. Kirill and Pope Francis appear to be on great terms and could be planning a re-unification soon. Eastern Orthodoxy, especially in the ROC, has its own kind of Fatima message. They, like the Fatimists, believe there will be a great revival of Christianity in Russia, despite warnings from the Bible and Remnant believers to the contrary.

There you have it. The heads of both the RCC and ROC are in the hands of the anti-Christ system. There is no sign of any kind of revival or restoration of Russia to either the Sacred Heart of Mary or to even traditional and true Eastern Orthodoxy.

Russia Insider is a honeypot

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 12, 2018 Anno Domini

Russia Insider is the rebirth of Russian-Jewish oligarch Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

Both strategically use anti-Jewish narratives in order to honeypot gullible people, at which point the sticky-lipped dupes are either rounded up and imprisoned or simply indoctrinated.

It is the latter in the case of Russia Insider, which is a go-to source for many Westerner alternative media junkies and Russia supporters.

Started in 2014 with the help the Kremlin and its oligarchic mafia (like Duginist Konstantin Malofeev), at the time when the neo-Bolshevik Putin regime was amping up its aggression against Ukraine, Russia Insider is the perfect Soviet double agent within the Western nationalist movement (not the first time the nationalist movement was infiltrated by the Soviets). They say all the right things at the right time, but when push comes to shove, they play the Judas Goat and mislead their audience into a Soviet Trust land of hypernormalized confusion and disinformation. One of Russia Insider’s creators, John Helmer, is alleged to have been recruited by the KGB. Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman has been featured on Kremlin-state media.

Looking at the lead article today at Russia Insider: “CHUTZPAH: CIA/Mossad Instigate Chemical Attack in Syria, Accuse Syria of Doing It”, the Soviet active measure of demoralizing the West is furthered. Instead of being told the truth, that Israel and Russia are the main players destroying Syria with largely Russian-groomed Chechen Jihadists, the clever crypto-Soviets spin it to being the fault of the “evil West”…then throw Israel in the mix as the gambit (notice it puts the CIA first, before Mossad). Peruse the rest of the site and all you will find are “articles” that can’t say enough great things about Putin and the Kremlin.

Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman featured on Kremlin-controlled state media multiple times.

Of course, this is all OK with Israel, because Israel is simply helping big brother Russia execute its long-range goal of demoralizing and destabilizing the West. Israel doesn’t mind being thrown under the bus, so long as it serves the overall goal of destroying the West and bringing it within the grip of its Judeo global governance scheme, with Israel, Russia, and China leading the world into the “Olam ha ba”. And what better cover than for Russia Insider to pretend to be opposed to globalism, a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup.

Almost all of the Western alternative media serves very much the same purpose: blame everything on the West (resulting in divide-and-conquer polarization), vindicate Russia and Arab Soviet satellites (Iran, Syria, etc.). This game is so obvious. Putin is not mystical or that unpredictable. His hypernormalization strategy is now out in the open. He is simply a more sophisticated Soviet leader pursuing the usual active measures against the West, but this time, he has a lot more Western leaders compromised than his predecessors had—take for example Angela Merkel in Soviet satellite Germany. Putin’s Red predecessors only really had Eastern Germany to puppeteer. Now the Kremlin has all of it and its largest economy in the European Union.

Jewish ritual murder revisited

By Honest Media Today (2005)

Here is an excellently documented presentation on Jewish ritual murder throughout history. The documentary starts off with three minutes of textual information but then begins with the presentation at the 3:14 mark.

Click here to watch Jewish Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult

The banking system unmasked

Money as Debt trilogy

Lessons in controlled opposition from Ted Turner’s WCW wrestling

Hollywood Hogan and his band of nWo rebels during their reign of Ted Turner’s WCW wrestling.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 24, 2018 Anno Domini

A unique thing happened in the sports-entertainment industrial complex in the 1990s that has many parallels to today’s theatrical political arena.

“Billionaire Ted” Turner’s extremely popular World Championship Wrestling(WCW) programs on TNT was atop the television ratings largely due to a controlled-opposition stable that became known as the “nWo”, or New World Order—a theme introduced by the show’s biggest star Hulk Hogan (Terry Bollea) when he became a “heel” (bad guy) for the first time in his career as a professional wrestler.

The public, mainly an audience of males in their teens and early twenties, perceived the nWo stable as a band of cool rebels that invaded the wrestling company from Trump crony Vince McMahon’s World Wrestling Federation(now WWE). The stable, created by WCW executive producer Eric Bishoff, appeared to be causing general havoc, disrupting the programing, starting brawls, and just taking over the show—and the public completely ate it up as real (it was really the beginning of reality TV). Little did the fans know that WCWwas behind the nWo stable and portraying it as a threat to WCW. It even got to a point where the stable was rebranding WCW, complete with logos and all. Turner even allowed nWo character Scott Hall to seemingly defame him as “Billionaire Ted”. Then the controlled opposition started to create its own controlled opposition (Wolfpac, LWO, OWN, etc.), until there were various stables all feuding with each other. This went on for a good four or five years before the suspension of disbelief started to wear down and the fans became bored with the psyop. It eventually led to falling ratings and a real-life takeover by McMahon, who ended WCWand globalist Turner’s short-lived venture into the wrestling business. But during its peak, the psyop angle was so successful that McMahon seemingly could only compete by turning his own wrestling promotion into a soft-porn show. It was pure smut. Even with frequent staged “nip slips” from its many porn-star-like female characters and constant homo-eroticism among many of the males, McMahon could barely keep up with the Turner/Bischoff nWo novelty.

Zionist/Marixist-controlled opposition and actor Donald Trump slams Vince McMahon through a table at Wrestlemania.

The use of political themes and psyops is nothing new to the wrestling business, as deception lies at the heart of its craft, with its largely fake beatings and body slams and glorified soap-opera storylines. Up until then, McMahon’s company had been incorporating political narratives into their storylines; for example, the Sgt. Slaughter angle as it relates to the first Gulf War, Desert Storm, and the “Bolsheviks”, a Russian tag team that was castigated in comic-book fashion. But WCW’s nWo stable was relatively new and presented in a more sophisticated and believable manner. The psyop revealed how its young, male audience could be deceived—through the use of fake, controlled opponents—something that is also key in the intelligence and political world and has been since ancient times. Since this period in professional wrestling, the sport has never been as popular. It’s ratings have not reached such highs as when the nWo was ruling and reigning the wrestling world.

Today’s political situation is almost entirely based on this same controlled-opposition psyop, whether it’s the Zionist-Marxist-globalist-controlled Trump and Putin, Julian Assange and Wikileaks, Qanon, neo-Nazis, Alex Jones, and many more. They’re all part of the real-life soap-operatic NWO stable. In fact, Trump himself has appeared in McMahon’s wrestling shows, posing as a fake opposition to McMahon, like in the “Battle of the Billionaires” drama.

In today’s post-truth world, where deception and deviation are the norm, reality TV is not confined to the sports stadiums. It’s played out on the TV news, in the alternative media, and through the ones we put our trust in to be sincere truth tellers and opponents of this madness. So, we must constantly have our guards up and continually use our discernment to identify and root out these traitors.

Mossad’s manipulation of the world

Excerpts from Israeli Mossad defector Victor Ostrovsky’s second book in his whistleblower series.

(Disclaimer: Ostrovsky may be a false opposition defector who leaks some truths as part of a Limited Hangout campaign to muddy the water overall. For example, he doesn’t explain what really happened when Israel helped the Soviets stage a fake coup against Gorbachev {see below}, but I tend to think Ostrovsky simply didn’t realize what was actually going on. Regardless, I think there is enough truth in his books to help us understand the bigger picture. —Timothy Fitzpatrick)

The Other Side of Deception (1994)
By Victor Ostrovsky

Jewish Banksters Finance Mossad

“Had this been a normal Mossad operation, he could have gotten as much money as he wanted from a bank sayan-a Jewish banker who is regarded as trustworthy and will open the bank for you at any time and provide as much money as needed”
—pg. 150

Mossad Feeds U.S. Intelligence Disinformation

“Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes. It brought about the air strike of Libya that President Reagan had promised-a strike that had three important consequences. First, it derailed a deal for the release of the American hostages in Lebanon, thus preserving the Hizballah (party of God) as the number one enemy in the eyes of the West. Second, it sent a message to the entire Arab world, telling them exactly where the United States stood regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict. Third, it boosted the Mossad’s image of itself, since it was they who, by ingenious sleight of hand, had prodded the United States to do what was right.”
—pg. 116

“By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan, which was only activated during heavy communication traffic hours. Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world (or, as they were called by the Libyans, Peoples’ Bureaus). As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it.”
—pg. 115

Mossad Creates and Controls Islamic Extremist Groups and Uses Them As Patsies

“Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.”
—pg. 197

Mossad Tests Chemical Weapons on Civilians

“It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Ziyyona facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory-ABC standing for atomic, bacteriological, and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed [Sampson Option], there was no room for error. The Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.”
—pg. 188

Mossad Frames People as Nazis to Discredit Them

“Ran had realized at some point in mid-1987 that trouble was on the horizon. There was growing dissatisfaction in the Mossad and in the right-wing elements of the Israeli government regarding the behaviour of Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who was defying direct Israeli warnings regarding his relationship with the Austrian leader Kurt Waldheim, who’d been branded a Nazi. (The branding was done by a field unity of Al that entered a UN building on Park Avenue South in New York and placed several incriminating documents that had been removed from other files into Waldheim’s file and the files of a few other individuals-for future use. The falsified documents were then discovered by Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Benjamin Netanyhu, as part of a smear campaign against Waldheim, who was critical of Israeli activities in southern Lebanon.) [Uwe Barschel was assassinated later by Mossad]
—pgs. 228-229

Mossad Control International Media

“He then wanted to hear as much as I could tell him about Robert Maxwell, the British newspaper magnate. His reason was that they were aware of the constant Mossad interest in purchasing media so that it could both influence public opinion and use journalism as a cover for inserting agents into countries.

“He identified Maxwell as a Mossad agent and also reminded me of other occasions on which the Mossad had been behind the purchase of newspapers in England. As an example, he gave the Eastern African, which was bought with Mossad money by an Israeli businessman. The purchase was made, he said, to assist the South African propaganda machine in making apartheid more palatable in the West….Maxwell was a sayan on a grand scale.”
—pg. 203

“I explained to my host, as I had to the British, that in the beginning the Mossad would help Maxwell purchase the newspapers by lending him money and causing labour disputes and other problems, making the target purchases more vulnerable. Later, the tactics changed; they would target in advance a paper that he was to purchase and start it on a collision course with bankruptcy using all available strategies, starting with workforce agitation and ending with pullback of funds from the paper through bankers and advertisers sympathetic to the Mossad. Then, once the target was softened, they’d send Maxwell in for the kill.”
—Pg. 204

Mossad Made Saddam Hussein into a Villian Despite the Fact that Israel Considered Him a Moderate

Ephraim had spelled it out for me and confirmed some of the information I’d already known. He then went on. “After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We are starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt it’ll work.” (spoken before the Gulf War)
—pg. 117

“The Mossad had all but saturated the intelligence field with information regarding the evil intentions of Saddam the Terrible, banking on the fact that before long, he’d have enough rope to hang himself.”

It was clear what the Mossad’s overall goal was. It wanted the West to do its bidding, just as the Americans had in Libya with the bombing of Qadhafi. After all, Israel didn’t possess carriers and ample air power, and although it was capable of bombing a refugee camp in Tunis, that was not the same. The Mossad leaders knew that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he’d been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear.”
—pg. 254

Mossad Destabilizes Countries Through Various Means Including Civil Anarchy, Arming Religious Fanatics, and Assassinations

“As long as it was political, it was fine, but now the Mossad is plunging headlong into this shit. They’ve decided that it’s time to destabilize Jordan to the point of civil anarchy.”

“Destabilize? How?”

“A high influx of counterfeit currency, causing distrust in the market; arming religious fundamentalist elements similar to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood; and assassinating leading figures who are symbols of stability, causing riots in the universities and forcing government to respond with harsh measures and lose popularity.

“Wasn’t the Mossad running weapons to the Egyptian fundamentalists through Afghanistan or something?”

“That’s right.”
—pg. 143

Mossad Behind Privatization Schemes

“The French wanted me to see what information I could gather on some people who, they were worried, were out to destabilize their South Pacific colonies. The plan of these supposed “destabilizers” was to privatize a small country as a model for the world (in other words, create a small political system in which there is no government ownership and see if that model can be extrapolated to a wider setting). A subsidiary goal was to make money in various ways.”

“The first name on the list I was handed was Robert Pool, Jr. A prominent American, Pool was the leading advocate of privatization of the American aviation industry. He was the president of the Reason Foundation, located in Santa Monica, California.”

“Then there was a man called Harry Donald Schultz. He was living in the United States and, from time to time, in Monaco. Schultz’s partner was named Riner Dienharts. The Frenchman said that all these names tied in somehow with a Canadian foundation in Vancouver, British Columbia, called the Phoenix Foundation.”

“Pool was a member, if not a leader, of the Libertarian party.”
—pgs. 243-244

Mossad Conducts Sophisticated Pyschological Warfare Against All Nations, Especially the United States

“Operation Brush-Fire. This was an all-out LAP (LoAhma Psicologit – Israeli psychological warfare) attack aimed at getting the United States involved militarily in the Middle East in general and the Gulf area in particular.”

“The Iran-Iraq war was over. It seemed that the Iranians had had enough and were happy to agree to end the war as the Iraqis wanted. The Mossad, for their part, pretended to the Americans that they wanted to topple Saddam Hussein, while at the same time passing on information to his Muchabarat from the Israeli embassy in Washington, warning him about various attempts on his life an don his regime. The Mossad regarded Saddam Hussein as their biggest asset in the area, since he was totally irrational as far as international politics was concerned, and was therefore all the more likely to make a stupid move that the Mossad could take advantage of.”

“Mossad manipulated it so that Iraq looked as if it were the only country unwilling to talk, thereby convincing the Americans that Iraq had a different agenda.”

“By January 1989, the Mossad LAP machine was busy portraying Saddam as a tyrant and a danger to the world. The Mossad activated every asset it had, in every place possible, from volunteer agents in Amnesty International to fully bought members of the U.S. Congress.”
—pgs. 246-247

Mossad Armed and Supported the Kurds Against Iraq and Saddam

“Saddam had been killing his own people, the cry went; what could his enemies expect? The gruesome photos of dead Kurdish mothers clutching their dead babies after a gas attack by Saddam’s army were real, and the acts were horrendous. But the Kurds were entangled in an all-out guerrilla war with the regime in Baghdad and had been supported for years by the Mossad, who sent arms and advisers to the mountain camps of the Barazany family; this attack by the Iraqis could hardly be called and attack on their own people.”
—pg. 247

Sayan (Secret Civilian Jewish Helpers) Break the Law to Help Mossad Carry Out Assassinations and Operations

“They left the cars in an underground parking lot to be picked up the next day by a car sayan who’d rented the cars to them (Mossad assassins) without registering the rental.”

Canadian Judge Bars Discussion of Ostrovsky’s First Book After Pressure From Israeli Government

“The Canadian judge had barred all discussions of the book for a period of ten days. I knew that this was the interval of time that the Mossad had to try to stop me.
—pg. 264

Zionist Larry King and Guests Call Ostrovsky a Liar – Jonathan Pollard Affair, The Lavon Affair

“Then there was the Larry King Show, by which time the gag order was lifted, where I received somewhat rougher treatment. To build some contentiousness into the hour, the show’s producers had invited Amos Perelmuter, a professor from the American University in Washington, D.C. to join King and me. From the start, it was clear that Perelmuter was an enthusiastic supporter of the state of Israel, and that what he’d heard about my book-he admitted he hadn’t read it-he didn’t like it.

There was never enough time on such shows to put Perelmuter and other “designated champions of Israel” on the spot. How did they know that everything I was saying was lies? I was the one who’d served in the Mossad, not they. Why was it that these loyal Americans were willing to accept any mud thrown at the CIA without even giving it a second though but insisted on defending to the hilt an intelligence agency of a foreign country that had been known to spy on the United States (as in the Pollard case) and hadn’t refrained from attacking American interests (as in the case of the Lavon affair in Egypt, among others)
—pg. 265

Ostrovsky Says Zionism and the State of Israel are a Racist, Prejudiced, and Oppressive Nightmare

“I had already realized for some time that I no longer shared that ideology that for me the state of Israel was no longer the fulfillment of an ancient dream. For me, it was more a nightmare of prejudice, wallowing in racism and waving the white and blue flag as a banner of oppression. I wanted no part of it. What I was doing now was showing the carriers of that banner their vulnerability, so that they would stop and reappraise their own purpose. Maybe then they could join the family of nations on an equal footing.”
—pg. 273

Mossad Planned a False-Flag Assassination of George Bush Using Palestinian Patsies at the Madrid Peace Conference

“There was no doubt that Bush would be out of his element on October 30 when he arrived in Madrid to open the peace talks.”

It was clear from the start that the assassination would be blamed on the Palestinians-perhaps ending once and for all their irritating resistance and making them the people most hated by all Americans.

Three Palestinian extremists were taken by a Kidon unit from their hiding place in Beirut and relocated incommunicado in a special detention location in the Negev desert. The three were Beijdun Salameh, Mohammed Hussein, and Hussein Shahin.

At the same time, various threats, some real and some not, were made against the president. The Mossad clique added its share, in order to more precisely define the threat as if it were coming from a group affiliated with a certain guarantee of getting attention and keeping it. So if something were to happen, the media would be quick to react and say, “We knew about it, and don’t forget where you saw it first.”
—pg. 278-279

Mossad Make Themselves Appear as the Heroes Even When They Are the Villains (Bush Assassination Plot)

“Several days before the event, it was leaked to the Spanish police that the three terrorists were on their way to Madrid and that they were probably planning some extravagant action. Since the Mossad had all the security arrangements in hand, it would not be a problem for this particular clique to bring the “killers” as close as they might want to the president and then stage a killing. In the ensuing confusion, the Mossad people would kill the “perpetrators”, scoring yet another victory for the Mossad. They’d be very sorry that they hadn’t been able to save the president, but protecting him was not their job to begin with. With all the security forces involved and the assassins dead, it would be very difficult to discover where the security breach had been, except that several of the countries in involved in the conference, such as Syria, were regarded as countries that assisted terrorists. With that in mind, it would be a foregone conclusion where the breach was. As far as the Mossad clique was concerned, it was a win-win situation.”
—pg. 279-280

Mossad Used Their Media Control to Discredit Israeli Nuclear Whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu

“But the Mossad had used its ace in the hole one time too many. Asking Maxwell to get involved in a matter of secondary importance (namely, the Vanunu affair) had been a big mistake, for which the media mogul would be made to pay the price.

That involvement caused suspicion in the British Parliament that there was no smoke without fire, particularly after the publication of a book by an American reporter claiming Maxwell was a Mossad agent.”
—pg. 284

Mossad helped stage phoney August Coup against Gorbachev in order to legitimize the so called democratization of the Soviet Union

“It was Maxwell who’d helped created the ties with the now-defunct KGB. The right-wingers realized it would be a devastating blow to Israel’s standing in the West of the world were to learn that the Mossad had participated in an way, as minute as that participation might be, in the attempted coup to stop the democratization of the Soviet Union. It would be perceived as treason against the West.”

A small meeting of right-wingers at Mossad headquarters resulted in a consensus to terminate Maxwell.”

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 155-158

The best known Soviet spy in history was the late British turncoat, H. A. R. “Kim” Philby. But “the rest of the story” about Philby’s intrigue was kept under wraps for nearly half a century. The truth is Philby was not just a KGB agent. He was also doubling as an agent for yet another intelligence agency—Israel’s Mossad. Only The Spotlight, the Washington-based populist weekly, told the amazing story—one which points to a “hidden history” of intrigue that has been deliberately suppressed by the “mainstream” media in the West.

In its June 25, 1984 issue, The Spotlight reported on a highly-classified summary of East-bloc espionage operations compiled in April of 1984 by Defense Department analysts. (A copy of that report was provided by well-placed sources to Andrew St. George, the chief diplomatic correspondent for The Spotlight.)

The summary cited several instances when covert agents from the KGB, the Soviet Union’s primary intelligence agency, joined forces with agents of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, to penetrate U.S. targets. Philby was among those who provided aid to the Mossad.

The study revealed that veteran CIA official William King Harvey ran afoul of the KGB and the Mossad as early as 1942 when he concluded a high-level investigation with a report denouncing Philby, then a top British counterintelligence official, as a Soviet“mole,” that is, a long-range covert Soviet penetration agent.

At the time, Philby was serving in Washington as the chief liaison officer between British and American intelligence, giving him access to the U.S. government’s most closely guarded security secrets.
What the other evidence in the Pentagon summary regarding Philby revealed—but which went unreported in all of the “mainstream” media accounts of the Philby affair—was that while Philby was spying for the Soviets, he was also working as an agent for the cause of political Zionism since the early 1940s.

A Russian memorial to British Zionist triple agent Kim Philby, who helped the Soviets.

This was well before the emergence of Israel as a sovereign state and the formation of the Mossad, which, according to former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, functions as “the real engine of policy” in Israel.

The Pentagon report revealed that in 1932, Philby was married in Vienna, Austria to Litzi Friedman, a communist organizer who was also active on behalf of the Zionist cause. Present at the nuptials were several key figures who later assumed leading roles in Israeli espionage. Among them were “Teddy” Kollek, who became much better known as the future longtime mayor of Jerusalem, and Jacob Meridor, one of the founders and directors of the Mossad.

When Harvey exposed Philby as a Red spy, he also cast doubt on Philby’s close friend, James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s director of counterintelligence who was also the CIA’s liaison to the Mossad and a faithful supporter of the Zionist cause.

Angleton and the Mossad felt threatened by Harvey’s unmasking of Philby as a Soviet mole. Soon enough, rumours began to circulate in Washington of Harvey’s “heavy drinking” and “scandalous” behaviour, with the rumours being fed directly to the White House.

In 1967, President Johnson fired Harvey from his CIA post and he retired in disgrace. As The Spotlight put it: “The leading American spymaster of the post-World War II era, who had exposed Philby and other major communist spies, spent his last years working for a publishing company in a dead-end job. He died in 1976 of a heart attack, obscure, poorly paid, and lonely.

(Ironically, in recent years, there was a fraudulent attempt to link Harvey to the JFK assassination, with the outlandish suggestion that Harvey had worked hand-in-glove with his longtime enemy,Angleton, and Angleton’s CIA lieutenants, in arranging the president’s murder. Nothing, could be further from the truth.)

In reality, Harvey was right. Philby was ultimately exposed as a major Soviet penetration agent and ultimately confessed, fleeing to Moscow where he ultimately died.

Today’s Russian president Vladimir Putin, a fake nationalist, is from the KGB mold.

Angleton’s fate was somewhat similar. In a long-suppressed top secret report (which was cited in the Pentagon summary described by The Spotlight), a senior CIA security official, C. Edward Petty, concluded that Angleton may have been a Soviet-Israeli penetration agent while he made his way to the top of the CIA bureaucracy.

The Petty report suggested that Angleton, throughout his career as the dominant figure in U.S. counterintelligence, had slipped vital information to both the Soviet Union and Israel. The report was submitted to President Gerald Ford in April of 1975, but a political decision was made that the evidence was not sufficient to indict and try Angleton, largely because it would have been impossible to stage a public trial of an intelligence official who was privy to as many secrets as Angleton was.

Instead, then-CIA director William Colby fired Angleton, enraging the Israeli lobby which had relied for so long on Angleton’s key placement in the counterintelligence bureaucracy. Angleton retired and died a broken man on May 11, 1987.

On December 14, 1998, The Spotlight was the only newspaper on the planet to publish a suppressed fact about the otherwise widely-publicized secrets about KGB espionage that were revealed with the release of the fabled Soviet diplomatic cables that were secretly decrypted beginning in 1946 by the U.S. Army Signals Security Agency and code-named “Venona.”

Military historian Ulick Steadman described the Venona venture as “an historic achievement,” but noted that there was “a shocking twist.” In fact, a vast majority of the alien agents unmasked by the decoded Soviet cables turned out to be active in Zionist circles rather than merely in the Communist underground. According to H. Dexter Gamage, who served as a Pentagon cryptography analyst, the Venona files revealed that Zionists “made up three-fourths of the enemy spies recruited by the Soviets” in the United States.

As a consequence, at the time the Venona project was under way, Gen. Omar Bradley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ordered the intercepts withheld from President Truman, because—according to Steadman—Bradley was “concerned that anything known to the White House would soon become known to the Zionist insiders [surrounding the president] and subsequently to the Soviets” who would discover that their cables were being intercepted.

Beginning in 1995-1996 portions of the Venona decryptions were finally released to great fanfare. However, significant portions of those long top secret documents have never been released, nor was a list of the Kremlin’s spies, each of whom was identified by name and code name.The identity of those spies is most interesting indeed.

In the original Soviet messages, a large number of operatives were marked with the letter “K” for “KRYSY” (i.e.“Rats”). “KRYSY” was the contemptuous Soviet code designation for the Zionist operatives under its control. In the version of these documents made public in the United States, The Spotlight revealed, the “K” designation was erased before release, reportedly by State Department censors.
A review by The Spotlight’s inimitable Andrew St. George of 35 decoded Soviet messages came up with 20 names of Zionist operatives in Moscow’s service. The same documents revealed only four Communist agents who had no apparent ethnic links to Zionism.

These more recent revelations certainly confirm other evidence we have examined that there really was a split at the highest levels between the Zionists and the Russian nationalists in the USSR during thee final days of the Stalin era and well into the years that followed.

This was a major secret element in the development of the Cold War—a rift that laid the groundwork for the rise of the pro-Zionist “neoconservative” network that has ultimately proven to be one of the most dangerous of America’s Enemies Within.

Until American patriots—real patriots—confront and understand these hidden elements within history, which cast a starkly different perspective on the events of the second half of the 20th century, it will be impossible to begin the process of winning back America—in the 21st century—from the hands of the Judas Goats: The Enemy Within.

The old labels of “liberal” and “conservative” just simply do not apply any more and a lot of the legends of the past—particularly of the Cold War era—must be recognized as precisely that: ‘legends.”

In the chapters that follow, we will examine additional evidence pointing to the role of so-called American “anti-communists” in shifting, bending, distortingm and destroying legitimate anti-communist movements for the benefit of the Zionist agenda.

As we shall see, there is much more to the story of the “McCarthy Era” and the “conservative” forces that began to align in that period than we have been led to believe.