Pacepa’s misreading of Operation SIG

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
August 28, 2019 Anno Domini

Soviet Romanian defector Ion Mihai Pacepa’s message to the world is a simplistic narrative of the Soviet Union pursuing a campaign to destroy Israel and the Jews, but it’s unclear why.

Soviet anti-Semitism as state policy is a decades-old myth that can only be Jewish disinformation itself, as it serves to distance the Jewish elite and the State of Israel from communism and its controlling organs in Russia and the East Bloc, thus protecting the hidden core of anti-Christ Jewish power in the world.

Operation SIG (Jewish-controlled government), a 1970s KGB plan to control the Middle East through conflict, seems to be a real KGB operation, as it is paralleled by known Israeli strategies like the Oded Yinon Plan (1982). It calls for perpetual conflict through Balkanizing the Arab world by arming and financing warring factions, including against Israel itself. Several Israeli dissidents, like Jack Bernstein and Victor Ostrovsky, corroborate Yinon’s prescriptions. For example, Ostrovsky writes in his book The Other Side of Deception, 

“Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete”. —pg. 297  

Israel’s long-running Likud party has ruled on policies that appear to be lifted straight from Yinon and Operation SIG. Likud itself was created by Russian and East Bloc Jews like Yitzhak Shamir (former Prime Minister of Israel and Mossad head). Operation SIG’s apparent purpose and direction fits in nicely with the Yinon Plan, yet Pacepa and analysts of Pacepa’s revelations fail to make the obvious connections and draw the correct conclusions. Instead, they misinterpret the evidence that serves only to further victimize the Jewish people and the state of Israel, with the fate of the West only an afterthought in the scheme of things.

Bernstein writes in The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel,

“In viewing the 1973 War, most people and it seems most Arabs are of the impression that since Soviet Russia sold equipment to Egypt and other Arab countries, the Soviets were in support of the Arabs in the 1973 War.This is a false impression. To understand that this is the result of more deceit on the part of Israel and the Soviet Union, you must be aware of the Golda Meir — Stalin/ Kaganovich Pact … Israel’s part of the pact was … Israel would allow an official communist party to function freely in Israel … Israel would not make any agreement to solve the Palestinian problem … Israel was to continue its Marxist economic policies and prevent any free-enterprise tendencies.”

Bernstein then explains the Soviet Union’s part of the pact, “the Soviets would institute a pro-Arab policy solely as a camouflage for its true intentions which was to furnish aid to the Arabs, but never enough to enable the Arabs to destroy Israel; the Soviets would open the gates of Soviet satellite countries to Jewish immigration to Israel. Should this be insufficient, Soviet Russia then would open its own gates to immigration; the Soviets would absolutely guarantee the security of Israel…both the Soviet Union and Israel would exchange intelligence reports.”

Pacepa’s misreading of what Yinon, Ostrovsky, and Bernstein have clearly laid out perpetuates the deception behind Operation SIG by protecting the real engineers of it. Although Pacepa does include the West as a target of Operation SIG, he gets distracted by the Israeli angle and puts the West in the back seat. Perhaps Pacepa has been allowed to make the revealtions he has under the condition that Israel and the Jews be made the primary targets of Soviet operations.

The destruction of the West seems to be the primary objective for the KGB’s seeding of anti-imperialist, anti-colonialist sentiment in the Arab world (and in Latin America), with anti-Zionism being the convenient conduit by which to achieve this. Anti-Zionism is, in effect, a limited hangout, to use intelligence jargon. Pacepa’s rendering of Operation SIG also serves as a limited hangout, as it leaves no possibility of the Soviet conspiracy and world Jewry of being allies.

Pacepa hints at the truth of the matter, perhaps out of sheer ignorance, when he writes, “The KGB always regarded anti-Semitism plus anti-imperialism as a rich source of anti-Americanism.” Pacepa quotes KGB head Yuri Andropov, suggesting that the KGB’s motive in running Operation SIG as primarily anti-Semitic. “We needed to instill a Nazi- style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist blood- bath against Israel”.

If the elite Jewish agenda in Israel is to maintain constant division and warring between Israel and its neighbours, then Andropov’s statement supports this. Pacepa misinterprets this because he doesn’t see that Israel is a Soviet satellite, or he is fake defector (I tend to think he is either a misinformed defector or a censored defector). Balkanization not only makes it easier to control the Middle East, it also serves to discredit the West, as the West is portrayed as being responsible for the Balkanization of the Middle East through its supposed creation, Israel. Pacepa doesn’t provide a clear motive for his version of Operation SIG. If Russia seeks to destroy Israel and the Jews, then why? Israel doesn’t attack Russia or carry out disinformation against it. Israel’s government largely is compromised of Soviet-derived stock. Communism is largely a Jewish creation. Even today, Jews are overrepresented in communist, socialist, and Marxist movements. Pacepa’s narrative makes no sense, unless he believes the ridiculous notion that the Soviet Union hated Jews just because they were Jews. Pacepa and his supporters would be more believable if they had argued that Soviet motive was simply to control the Middle East as part of its world communist plot, but they just can’t help themselves. They have to victimize Jewry at each and every turn.

Israel is a Kremlin decoy

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 12, 2019 Anno Domini

Jewish political power seems to be concentrated in the still-present, yet deceptively modified, Soviet collectivist system and not in the state of Israel, as most believe.

Israel is merely a branch of this Soviet system, albeit, an important one, and largely serves as a decoy to hide the Soviet origin of crimes against humanity.

The Russia Federation today is following the same Soviet pattern in using Israel as a fall guy for its crimes as it has done with China for decades; thereby, throwing analysts off the trail to Moscow and securing the unfettered advancement of Soviet plans.

With the staged theatrics of the Sino-Soviet split from 1956-1966, as part of the scissors strategy (the fake falling out between the two red powers), the Soviets effectively used China to cover up their leading role in crimes like its global narcotics offensive against the West. Even today, China is all too willing to not only portray itself as openly communist, but take the blame for any perceived subversion of the West, when, in fact, subversive directives appear to be coming from Moscow, whose regime hides under the thin mask of democracy. Notice how Western Right-wing media today obsesses on China but demonizes and denigrates anyone who criticizes Moscow? This is exactly the desired outcome of Soviet planning.

“These propaganda instructions were extended in 1964 in a letter signed by Leonid Brezhnev which was discussed at a meeting of the Czechoslovak Defence Council. The letter directed that data on the Chinese drug and narcotics trafficking operation should be made public, to advertise China’s role as the source of illicit trafficking and thus to draw attention away from the Soviet operation. (One of the first articles written for this purpose appeared in Pravda on September 13,1964. It was written by V. Ovchinnikov and was entitled ‘The Drug Dealers’: see also page 146, and Note 43, page 152).” (1)

So, then, why wouldn’t Russia do something similar with the state of Israel (or other groups, for that matter)? Israel is a nation founded by Bolshevik Jews and currently run by Bolshevik Jews, exemplified in the Soviet-derived Likud party headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Every Prime Minister of Israel to present time has had Soviet roots, the intelligence services of both Israel and Russia seem to be working side by side, and both powers are co-operating in building the biggest economic alliance the world has ever seen (one belt, one road initiative)—to name just a few of the many similarities between the two powers.

It seems that Russia’s primary uses for Israel are to: 

  1. Turn the world against the West (via indignation over Western support of Israel to the detriment of the Arab world) 
  2. Divide Westerners (anti-Zionist Leftists vs. pro-Zionist right wingers) 
  3. Displace Islamic world populations in order to facilitate the Soviet Kalergi Plan (via wars for Israel),
  4. Subvert Western political institutions (under the guise of Israel as a Western ally, i.e., Kim Philby, Jonathan Pollard). 
  5. Shepherd resulting Islamic anti-Zionism, anti-Americanism into terrorist cells against Weststern targets (actual and/or false flags)

Secondarily, the Bolsheviks may be using Israel to affirm masonic and Talmudic prophecy, centring around the City of Jerusalem. Unfortunately, well-meaning anti-Zionists get caught up in this secondary use, which forces their incorrect conclusions of the bigger picture. Also, whether intentional or not, Soviet Bolsheviks have utilized the existence of the state of Israel to demonize opponents of Jewish power as “Nazis” and/or “anti-Semites”.

Carefully, Russia has used Israel to turn the Middle East and Africa against Israel and, more importantly, the West while Russia waits in the wings to accept the seemingly helpless Arabs and Africans into its open arms, as explained by Jack Bernstein in the New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv triangle.

“From the terms of this pact, you can see it was, and still is, the aim of the Soviet Union and Zionist/Marxist Israel to prevent peace between the Arab countries and Israel until all the Arab countries are forced to adopt socialism under Soviet leadership.” (2)

Worst yet, Western conservatives have now also embraced Russia and the “former” Soviet bloc—naively believing that the crypto-Reds will save the world from the supposed Western-led New World Order. In other words, the Soviets have succeeded in turning both Lefitsts and right-wingers against their own government (a long-range Leninist goal), yet neither side can see this in its proper context (see: The Left’s fake anti-Russia narrative explained).

Although high-ranking Soviet defector Ion Mihai Pacepa doesn’t seem to understand Israel’s true role in the Soviet offensive, he does correctly identify Moscow’s leading role in Middle East turmoil and its intended negative effects on the West.

“’By 1972, Andropov’s disinformation machinery was working around the clock to persuade the Islamic world that Israel and the United States intended to transform the rest of the world into a Zionist fiefdom,” Pacepa writes of the Soviet’s Operation SIG. (3) “According to Andropov, the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch.” (4)

Pacepa goes on to reveal that the Soviets went as far as seeding Arabic-translated copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in the Arab world even though, previously, it was Soviet policy to imprison or execute those caught with this banned material. At home, it seems, the Soviets want to keep a lid on the Protocols but see its uses for consumption abroad. (For more on this aspect of Soviet Israel, please see my article The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel.)

Most people cannot understand this clever strategy. They might say, “why would Bolsheviks throw Bolsheviks under the bus?” If Israel weren’t thrown into the mix, the strategy would be too obvious. Imagine that Russia turned the Middle East against only the West but not Israel. You don’t think Western analysts would figure out that it were a Soviet measure? This is one of the reasons that Israel was created—to disguise the Soviet offensive against the West and the plan for world communism. It’s no coincidence that Israel and the West almost always gets fingered for all world events by both the Left and the Right: Israel/CIA killed JFK, not Russia; Israel/CIA did 9/11, not Russia; Israel/CIA is oppressing the Palestinians, not Russia; Israel/CIA conducts false-flag terrorism, not Russia; Israel/CIA manufactures and distributes narcotics, not Russia; Israel/CIA runs sexual blackmail operations, not Russia…. Hopefully you get the point. But just about everything Israel is accused of, there is evidence that the Soviet system is responsible.

What if Russia, like it has done with China, deliberately made public information implicating Israel in Kremlin crimes, like 9/11, for example? Isn’t it just a little suspicious that the Israel-friendly right-wing mainstream media reported Israelis dancing on a roof top as the World Trade Centre collapsed, Israeli spying in America just prior to 9/11 (Carl Cameron of Fox News), and suspicious Israelis arrested on 9/11? I’m not suggesting that Israelis weren’t involved but that their role may deliberately have been exaggerated so as to eliminate any possible trail back to Moscow. Or take JFK conspiracy theories. Most of them centre around blaming either the CIA (which fits the anti-Western Soviet narrative) or, in the alt right, Israel. Talk of Soviet orchestration is nearly completely absent from the debate.

As it stands today, analyzing the Soviet threat outside of the narrative of China and North Korea is off limits. While the fake collapse of communism provides the primary protection for Soviet Russia’s continued advancedment of world communism, Soviet Israel provides the added layer.

Notes:

  1. Douglass, Jospeh D., Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West,1999, pg. 41
  2. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, 1984, The Noontide Press, California, pg. 23
  3. Pacepa, Ion Mihai, Disinformation, 
  4. Pacepa, Ion Mihai, Russian Footprints, National Review Online, August 24, 2006 – https://web.archive.org/web/20100715214448/http://article.nationalreview.com/289014/russian-footprints/ion-mihai-pacepa 

The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel

Soviet-created anti-Zionist leaflets dropped in Syria depict Israel and the “evil West” running ISIS, as propaganda to agitate the Muslims against West and into Communist hands.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Realizing the truth of the Perestroika deception has changed our understanding of the entire geopolitical game significantly.

This rare knowledge, brought to us by brave souls like Anatoliy Golitsyn, has made everything clearer. We can now see the full scope of Jewish power today in a world swarming with disinformation and controlled opposition.

If Jewish Bolshevik power never left Russia but remained and, as one of its objectives, created and groomed Israel as a Soviet satellite, is it reasonable to assume that the infamous Elders of Zion—the Kahal— are based in Moscow and not Tel Aviv?

Remember that Jewry once used England as its base of operations, thanks to traitors like Oliver Cromwell, and it appears that not long after Judaic ‘Brit’ain helped found the masonic republic of the United States of America, Jewry set its sights on the Holy Russian Empire, not only to eradicate Christian monarchy but also to set up a base of operations for its international super government.

And if the Chosenite base of operations resides in the Lubyanka, whether through its international crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch, the POLITBURO, or the still-functioning COMINTERN, it can only be reasonable to assume that its Balkanization plan for the Middle East, commonly known as the Oded Yinon Plan, is also directed from Russia. What’s more, the Yinon Plan seems to serve as a model for a global Balkanization scheme, which is nothing more than old Soviet expansionism, with Eurasian-led global collectivism as the ultimate goal.

Well, as it happens, Russia has a long history of fomenting anti-Zionist agitation, especially in the Arab world. When they aren’t dropping leaflets from planes over Syria with cartoons of America and Israel puppeteering ISIS, the crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is directing almost every single liberation organization (color revolutions) in the Arab world and even in the West. These liberation organizations—like the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), for example—have been telling Muslims for decades that they must rise up against the great Zionist power and its Western backers America. Israel and the West are the great Satan, the rhetoric goes. This is an awfully convenient narrative for anti-Western communist expansionist aspirations, isn’t it? In the West, the KGB-run Irish Republican Army (IRA) is anti-Zionist and even overtly Marxist, as was the violent FLQ separatist group in Quebec, Canada. The continuity is all there: “liberation”, anti-Zionism, and Marxism. Yet no one of prominence seems to make these obvious connections. Of course, these liberation fronts are all about “liberating” said nations expressly so that they can be gobbled up by Soviet expansion.

This Soviet agitation of the Muslim world achieves several key goals for Jewish world imperium:

1. It makes possible the potential for creating Islamic terrorism, which can then be used in false flag attacks around the world, not just in Islamic countries. This terrorist threat can be exported to virtually any Soviet satellite or through its criminal network in the West—all the more so when Israel and double agents within Western intelligence are providing cover for the export. With authentic terrorist attacks, it serves by keeping the Jewish people (at home and abroad) in a constant state of fear and in subjugation to their Pharisaic Jewish leaders (as the Protocols of Zion presciently revealed over 100 years ago, “Their anti-Semitism is indispensible to us for the management of our lesser brethren”). The wave of modern terrorism also has the benefit of providing a pretext for Western countries to bring in oppressive police measures on the general population (this also benefits the technocracy aspect of Jewish global conquest: non-stop surveillance, smart grid, environmentalism [also Soviet controlled], etc.)

2. By linking the West to Jewish oppression of the Arab world, the West is discredited and demonized to the Arab world, leaving Muslims sympathetic to Soviet expansionism in the Arab world (Arab oil, among other things) and in the West (including in Ukraine and Europe). This demonization of the West only fuels more indignant Muslim radicals to commit terrorism and/or join Russo-Judeo-controlled false flag capers like ISIS, Al Qaeda, ISIL, etc. in Western countries. 

3. To moderate Muslims, Soviet agitation pits them against the West and even their own Arab leaders (who are mostly KGB assets, like Assad in Syria), because Soviet propaganda has moderates believing that Israel and the West are behind Jihadist groups, which is partially true. Essentially, this is the driving force behind the Balkanization of the Arab world: moderates against radicals, radicals against the West and Israel, moderates and radicals against their own government—just constant infighting. That’s been the Russian-Jewish strategy since Israel was founded in 1948 (Israel’s legitimacy was first officially recognized by the Soviet Union).

4. Finally, with this constant fracturing and splintering of Islamic states, displaced Muslims are left fleeing to the West, which furthers the Russo-Judeo Kalergi plan of diluting white, Western, Christian nations with Muslims, blacks, Asians, etc. in order to create a massive mongrel slave class—primed for a technocratic Orwellian clamp down. Western liberals, who should be more opposed to Islamic immigration than anyone (due to Sharia), have been tricked into supporting the Islamic invasion of the West because they perceive Israeli oppression of the Islamic world as being part of British-American colonialism, which they hate far more than Sharia law. Colonialism, however liberals perceive it, is considered the greatest evil in history. Therefore, they feel a sense of guilt and sympathy to the perceived plight of the Islamic world. This Leftist perception did not come about by accident. It was planned this way. Now, Leftists are falling for the gambit and cheerleading the Kalergi plan.

5. The perception of Russia as the anti-Zionist hero of the Middle East and as an Orthodox Christian ethno state serves the final goal of hoodwinking the last bastion of opposition to global communism: Western nationalists/conservatives. Win them over and it’s game over. This is where we are at today. Putinist Russia and the Trump regime are all about streamling conservative/nationalist sentiment into communist hands in Russia. The Western Left is already Marxist; all that is left is to honeypot conservatives and anti-communists. This goal is almost a done deal, as most in the alt media and in the nationalist cause are pro-Russia, pro-Trump. What the Jewry does next remains to be seen.

Hopefully by now, you can see how both Russia and Israel benefit from anti-Zionism. Anti-Zionism does not hurt Israel. It only plays into Jewry’s hands. Russia plays the good cop while Israel plays the bad cop. The bad cop pushes the Arab world into the seemingly loving arms of the good cop. 

Another benefit of running and controlling the global anti-Zionist movement is that Jewry gets to homogenize their opposition into a smaller, more manageable “opponent”. How many individuals seeking the truth on the Jewish question have been derailed and suckered into becoming anti-Zionist activists? Plenty. Was Rachel Corrie’s death really heroic? Zionism itself has little to do with the age-old Jewish question. The Jewish problem has been around a lot longer than the state of Israel has. In this way, anti-Zionism serves as a distraction.  Kremlin organs like Zerohedge and Russia Insider facilitate this same homogenization scheme but using a slightly harsher tone than anti-Zionism (I wrote an article about this using Russia Insider as an example). It seems that these organs rarely ever cast Israel or Jews in a negative light without first implicating the West.

Ultimately, Zionism serves Jewry by allowing it to control its opposition, its own people (at home and abroad), as well as Christian Zionists, and allows Russia to control the Arab world. Control of the Arab world gives Russia, in cooperation with China, the resources it needs to economically and genetically overthrow the West and helps it to water down and weed out opponents to world Jewish collectivism.

Dirty secrets of the Jewish Kabbalah

Below is video of probably the most revealing and rare exposés of the demonic Jewish Kabbalah, which constitutes the core of the New World Order conspiracy—the conspiracy against Christ and His Church. This is an in-depth four-hour series. I have not seen it anywhere else on the web. If you like the above graphic, please share it through social media, email, or other. Please also share the documentary linked below.

Secrets of the Kabbalah Revealed:

Part I

Part II

9/11 Missing Links

By John Alan Martinson and Mike Delaney

Examining the Israeli orchestration of the Sept. 11 terror attacks in NYC.

Final cut (After clicking play, it takes about 20 seconds to get going for some reason; alternatively, you can watch it here)

Mossad’s manipulation of the world

Excerpts from Israeli Mossad defector Victor Ostrovsky’s second book in his whistleblower series.

(Disclaimer: Ostrovsky may be a false opposition defector who leaks some truths as part of a Limited Hangout campaign to muddy the water overall. For example, he doesn’t explain what really happened when Israel helped the Soviets stage a fake coup against Gorbachev {see below}, but I tend to think Ostrovsky simply didn’t realize what was actually going on. Regardless, I think there is enough truth in his books to help us understand the bigger picture. —Timothy Fitzpatrick)

The Other Side of Deception (1994)
By Victor Ostrovsky

Jewish Banksters Finance Mossad

“Had this been a normal Mossad operation, he could have gotten as much money as he wanted from a bank sayan-a Jewish banker who is regarded as trustworthy and will open the bank for you at any time and provide as much money as needed”
—pg. 150

Mossad Feeds U.S. Intelligence Disinformation

“Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes. It brought about the air strike of Libya that President Reagan had promised-a strike that had three important consequences. First, it derailed a deal for the release of the American hostages in Lebanon, thus preserving the Hizballah (party of God) as the number one enemy in the eyes of the West. Second, it sent a message to the entire Arab world, telling them exactly where the United States stood regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict. Third, it boosted the Mossad’s image of itself, since it was they who, by ingenious sleight of hand, had prodded the United States to do what was right.”
—pg. 116

“By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan, which was only activated during heavy communication traffic hours. Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world (or, as they were called by the Libyans, Peoples’ Bureaus). As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it.”
—pg. 115

Mossad Creates and Controls Islamic Extremist Groups and Uses Them As Patsies

“Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.”
—pg. 197

Mossad Tests Chemical Weapons on Civilians

“It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Ziyyona facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory-ABC standing for atomic, bacteriological, and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed [Sampson Option], there was no room for error. The Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.”
—pg. 188

Mossad Frames People as Nazis to Discredit Them

“Ran had realized at some point in mid-1987 that trouble was on the horizon. There was growing dissatisfaction in the Mossad and in the right-wing elements of the Israeli government regarding the behaviour of Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who was defying direct Israeli warnings regarding his relationship with the Austrian leader Kurt Waldheim, who’d been branded a Nazi. (The branding was done by a field unity of Al that entered a UN building on Park Avenue South in New York and placed several incriminating documents that had been removed from other files into Waldheim’s file and the files of a few other individuals-for future use. The falsified documents were then discovered by Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Benjamin Netanyhu, as part of a smear campaign against Waldheim, who was critical of Israeli activities in southern Lebanon.) [Uwe Barschel was assassinated later by Mossad]
—pgs. 228-229

Mossad Control International Media

“He then wanted to hear as much as I could tell him about Robert Maxwell, the British newspaper magnate. His reason was that they were aware of the constant Mossad interest in purchasing media so that it could both influence public opinion and use journalism as a cover for inserting agents into countries.

“He identified Maxwell as a Mossad agent and also reminded me of other occasions on which the Mossad had been behind the purchase of newspapers in England. As an example, he gave the Eastern African, which was bought with Mossad money by an Israeli businessman. The purchase was made, he said, to assist the South African propaganda machine in making apartheid more palatable in the West….Maxwell was a sayan on a grand scale.”
—pg. 203

“I explained to my host, as I had to the British, that in the beginning the Mossad would help Maxwell purchase the newspapers by lending him money and causing labour disputes and other problems, making the target purchases more vulnerable. Later, the tactics changed; they would target in advance a paper that he was to purchase and start it on a collision course with bankruptcy using all available strategies, starting with workforce agitation and ending with pullback of funds from the paper through bankers and advertisers sympathetic to the Mossad. Then, once the target was softened, they’d send Maxwell in for the kill.”
—Pg. 204

Mossad Made Saddam Hussein into a Villian Despite the Fact that Israel Considered Him a Moderate

Ephraim had spelled it out for me and confirmed some of the information I’d already known. He then went on. “After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We are starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt it’ll work.” (spoken before the Gulf War)
—pg. 117

“The Mossad had all but saturated the intelligence field with information regarding the evil intentions of Saddam the Terrible, banking on the fact that before long, he’d have enough rope to hang himself.”

It was clear what the Mossad’s overall goal was. It wanted the West to do its bidding, just as the Americans had in Libya with the bombing of Qadhafi. After all, Israel didn’t possess carriers and ample air power, and although it was capable of bombing a refugee camp in Tunis, that was not the same. The Mossad leaders knew that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he’d been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear.”
—pg. 254

Mossad Destabilizes Countries Through Various Means Including Civil Anarchy, Arming Religious Fanatics, and Assassinations

“As long as it was political, it was fine, but now the Mossad is plunging headlong into this shit. They’ve decided that it’s time to destabilize Jordan to the point of civil anarchy.”

“Destabilize? How?”

“A high influx of counterfeit currency, causing distrust in the market; arming religious fundamentalist elements similar to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood; and assassinating leading figures who are symbols of stability, causing riots in the universities and forcing government to respond with harsh measures and lose popularity.

“Wasn’t the Mossad running weapons to the Egyptian fundamentalists through Afghanistan or something?”

“That’s right.”
—pg. 143

Mossad Behind Privatization Schemes

“The French wanted me to see what information I could gather on some people who, they were worried, were out to destabilize their South Pacific colonies. The plan of these supposed “destabilizers” was to privatize a small country as a model for the world (in other words, create a small political system in which there is no government ownership and see if that model can be extrapolated to a wider setting). A subsidiary goal was to make money in various ways.”

“The first name on the list I was handed was Robert Pool, Jr. A prominent American, Pool was the leading advocate of privatization of the American aviation industry. He was the president of the Reason Foundation, located in Santa Monica, California.”

“Then there was a man called Harry Donald Schultz. He was living in the United States and, from time to time, in Monaco. Schultz’s partner was named Riner Dienharts. The Frenchman said that all these names tied in somehow with a Canadian foundation in Vancouver, British Columbia, called the Phoenix Foundation.”

“Pool was a member, if not a leader, of the Libertarian party.”
—pgs. 243-244

Mossad Conducts Sophisticated Pyschological Warfare Against All Nations, Especially the United States

“Operation Brush-Fire. This was an all-out LAP (LoAhma Psicologit – Israeli psychological warfare) attack aimed at getting the United States involved militarily in the Middle East in general and the Gulf area in particular.”

“The Iran-Iraq war was over. It seemed that the Iranians had had enough and were happy to agree to end the war as the Iraqis wanted. The Mossad, for their part, pretended to the Americans that they wanted to topple Saddam Hussein, while at the same time passing on information to his Muchabarat from the Israeli embassy in Washington, warning him about various attempts on his life an don his regime. The Mossad regarded Saddam Hussein as their biggest asset in the area, since he was totally irrational as far as international politics was concerned, and was therefore all the more likely to make a stupid move that the Mossad could take advantage of.”

“Mossad manipulated it so that Iraq looked as if it were the only country unwilling to talk, thereby convincing the Americans that Iraq had a different agenda.”

“By January 1989, the Mossad LAP machine was busy portraying Saddam as a tyrant and a danger to the world. The Mossad activated every asset it had, in every place possible, from volunteer agents in Amnesty International to fully bought members of the U.S. Congress.”
—pgs. 246-247

Mossad Armed and Supported the Kurds Against Iraq and Saddam

“Saddam had been killing his own people, the cry went; what could his enemies expect? The gruesome photos of dead Kurdish mothers clutching their dead babies after a gas attack by Saddam’s army were real, and the acts were horrendous. But the Kurds were entangled in an all-out guerrilla war with the regime in Baghdad and had been supported for years by the Mossad, who sent arms and advisers to the mountain camps of the Barazany family; this attack by the Iraqis could hardly be called and attack on their own people.”
—pg. 247

Sayan (Secret Civilian Jewish Helpers) Break the Law to Help Mossad Carry Out Assassinations and Operations

“They left the cars in an underground parking lot to be picked up the next day by a car sayan who’d rented the cars to them (Mossad assassins) without registering the rental.”

Canadian Judge Bars Discussion of Ostrovsky’s First Book After Pressure From Israeli Government

“The Canadian judge had barred all discussions of the book for a period of ten days. I knew that this was the interval of time that the Mossad had to try to stop me.
—pg. 264

Zionist Larry King and Guests Call Ostrovsky a Liar – Jonathan Pollard Affair, The Lavon Affair

“Then there was the Larry King Show, by which time the gag order was lifted, where I received somewhat rougher treatment. To build some contentiousness into the hour, the show’s producers had invited Amos Perelmuter, a professor from the American University in Washington, D.C. to join King and me. From the start, it was clear that Perelmuter was an enthusiastic supporter of the state of Israel, and that what he’d heard about my book-he admitted he hadn’t read it-he didn’t like it.

There was never enough time on such shows to put Perelmuter and other “designated champions of Israel” on the spot. How did they know that everything I was saying was lies? I was the one who’d served in the Mossad, not they. Why was it that these loyal Americans were willing to accept any mud thrown at the CIA without even giving it a second though but insisted on defending to the hilt an intelligence agency of a foreign country that had been known to spy on the United States (as in the Pollard case) and hadn’t refrained from attacking American interests (as in the case of the Lavon affair in Egypt, among others)
—pg. 265

Ostrovsky Says Zionism and the State of Israel are a Racist, Prejudiced, and Oppressive Nightmare

“I had already realized for some time that I no longer shared that ideology that for me the state of Israel was no longer the fulfillment of an ancient dream. For me, it was more a nightmare of prejudice, wallowing in racism and waving the white and blue flag as a banner of oppression. I wanted no part of it. What I was doing now was showing the carriers of that banner their vulnerability, so that they would stop and reappraise their own purpose. Maybe then they could join the family of nations on an equal footing.”
—pg. 273

Mossad Planned a False-Flag Assassination of George Bush Using Palestinian Patsies at the Madrid Peace Conference

“There was no doubt that Bush would be out of his element on October 30 when he arrived in Madrid to open the peace talks.”

It was clear from the start that the assassination would be blamed on the Palestinians-perhaps ending once and for all their irritating resistance and making them the people most hated by all Americans.

Three Palestinian extremists were taken by a Kidon unit from their hiding place in Beirut and relocated incommunicado in a special detention location in the Negev desert. The three were Beijdun Salameh, Mohammed Hussein, and Hussein Shahin.

At the same time, various threats, some real and some not, were made against the president. The Mossad clique added its share, in order to more precisely define the threat as if it were coming from a group affiliated with a certain guarantee of getting attention and keeping it. So if something were to happen, the media would be quick to react and say, “We knew about it, and don’t forget where you saw it first.”
—pg. 278-279

Mossad Make Themselves Appear as the Heroes Even When They Are the Villains (Bush Assassination Plot)

“Several days before the event, it was leaked to the Spanish police that the three terrorists were on their way to Madrid and that they were probably planning some extravagant action. Since the Mossad had all the security arrangements in hand, it would not be a problem for this particular clique to bring the “killers” as close as they might want to the president and then stage a killing. In the ensuing confusion, the Mossad people would kill the “perpetrators”, scoring yet another victory for the Mossad. They’d be very sorry that they hadn’t been able to save the president, but protecting him was not their job to begin with. With all the security forces involved and the assassins dead, it would be very difficult to discover where the security breach had been, except that several of the countries in involved in the conference, such as Syria, were regarded as countries that assisted terrorists. With that in mind, it would be a foregone conclusion where the breach was. As far as the Mossad clique was concerned, it was a win-win situation.”
—pg. 279-280

Mossad Used Their Media Control to Discredit Israeli Nuclear Whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu

“But the Mossad had used its ace in the hole one time too many. Asking Maxwell to get involved in a matter of secondary importance (namely, the Vanunu affair) had been a big mistake, for which the media mogul would be made to pay the price.

That involvement caused suspicion in the British Parliament that there was no smoke without fire, particularly after the publication of a book by an American reporter claiming Maxwell was a Mossad agent.”
—pg. 284

Mossad helped stage phoney August Coup against Gorbachev in order to legitimize the so called democratization of the Soviet Union

“It was Maxwell who’d helped created the ties with the now-defunct KGB. The right-wingers realized it would be a devastating blow to Israel’s standing in the West of the world were to learn that the Mossad had participated in an way, as minute as that participation might be, in the attempted coup to stop the democratization of the Soviet Union. It would be perceived as treason against the West.”

A small meeting of right-wingers at Mossad headquarters resulted in a consensus to terminate Maxwell.”

Stephen Lendman is Trotskyite controlled opposition

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 29, 2018

Opinion writer Stephen Lendman is the quintessential alternative media Putin and Trump cheerleader these days.

He seemed to ride in a decade ago among the patriot movement on the coattails of anti-Zionism, even though he appears to believe in a pure form of Zionism that is true to Torah. Once, upon entering online conspiracy circles (as far back as 2006?), Lendman had stripped away the guard of truthers, he was able to bring in his real agenda: Trotskyite communism, which naturally entails promoting the de-Stalinized crypto-Soviet state of Russia, headed by organized crime-installed Vladimir Putin and run by international Jewish crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch.

Initially, Lendman got his push from big alt media aggregates like Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero, and others. He is an associate for another apparent Jewish Trotskyite, the pro-Russian, pro-Trump Michel Chossudovsky and his Centre for Research on Globalization (GlobalReseearch.ca). Lendman hasn’t become huge, but he has been a consistent Trotskyite voice in the alt media. He was cheerleading Russia long before it became popular for the Alt Media to do so.

Lendman starts off his latest Kremlin-backed public relations piece with,

“US-led Western media reporting on Russia is consistently hostile, a disturbing near-daily tirade of disinformation, Big Lies and fake news.”

Ironic considering Jewish-led alternative media reporting on Russia is consistently favourable to the Reds, and even more disturbingly, carries out daily rants about how the Russians (Soviets) are supposedly saving the planet from the banksters and reviving Christianity and nationalism. You’d be hard-pressed to find even one major alternative media personality who criticizes Russia. Go on. I challenge you to find just one. In that same article, Lendman completely dismisses the fact of the Kremlin’s online troll farming, like that of the Internet Research Agency, which is part of the Soviet’s Perestroika psychological warfare plan, not just a division but the core basis of its intelligence apparatus.

Getting back to Lendman’s latest desinformatsiya piece, Lendman vents his seeming outrage at the “notorious Russophobic” Anne Applebaum. Gotta love the irony of Jews criticizing their fellow controlled opposition Jews, sort of like the Trotskyite-Zionist approved fake anti-communist American Jewish League Against Communism, which was largely funded by Bernard Baruch. The anti-Communist McCarthyite movement was entirely controlled by Jews—one of the reasons being to take the heat off of Jews when it came to fingering them as leading the worldwide communist conspiracy. It’s a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup. Lendman, apparently, is another fox. There are many just like him in the alternative media. Nobody seems to be deviating from the pro-Russian script. Nobody except for a few voices with not much of a platform.

Those are just some examples, but Lendman stops at nothing to portray Russia as a perfect angel and saviour of humanity. He deliberately is misleading his audience.

I did a search of Lendman’s site using the term “Perestroika Deception”, which obviously is my latest obsession, and I came across two references, but they were to only “Perestroika” and they were just brief references to Gorbachev’s public Perestroika program. You would think a man like Lendman certainly would have come across Antatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika thesis. But it’s completely absent. And for good reason. It’s the thesis that would put Lendman out of business, as well as dismantle the entire Judeo-Soviet ruse that has hypnotized the West and launched into Cold War 2.0 theatrics.

Anti-Jewish (chassidic) Stalinist era propaganda. Now that Stalinism has been purged from the crytpo-Soviet Russian state, we are seeing the re-Judaizing of Russia and ever stronger ties between Israel and Russia.

Lendman seems to believe that throwing in the odd piece about the plight of the Palestinians will legitimize his disinformation operation to the alternative media audience. He also seems to believe that blaming the U.S. government (not the true culprits in Israel and the Zionist lobby) for the 9/11 conspiracy helps him pass the Truther litmus test. So far, it has worked. Doing a cursory search, I could not find anything remotely critical of Lendman and his work. He is blindly accepted by the truther movement and promoted.

“It’s why growing thousands of Jews globally oppose an ideology based on power, conquest, dispossession, and violation of the most fundamental Jewish ethical and moral teachings, ones Zionists disdain,” Lendman writes in his seemingly anti-Zionist sympathizing with the Jews Against Zionism movement. Where can be found these Jewish “ethical and moral teachings”? Lendman doesn’t really explain. It’s difficult to pinpoint what kind of Jew Lendman is. He could be Orthodox but he could also be liberal or reform (he calls himself “progressive”).

In a review of Lendman’s works, James Petras stated,

“…Lendman’s essays are a major contribution to the struggle for social justice in America.”

Yikes.

Lendman’s apparent left-leaning defence of de-Stalinized Russia is definitely Trotskyite, in some sense. He could be part of a joint ADL-FBI COINTELPRO operation, the way the anti-Stalin communist New York Jews of the McCarthyite era were. And what does it say that the alternative media continues to give Lendman a platform?

Lendman appears to be aiding the Soviet long-range Perestroika strategy to feign Russian democratization while radicalizing and destabilizing the West. With Lendman, throw in some world war fear mongering and you have a unique psyop.

The overall plan is to lull the West to sleep about the communist threat in order to ripen it for a world communistic government takeover, with Russia leading it militarily and Israel bringing us goyim into spiritual enlightenment. The lulling involves both the Left and the Right. The plan has no loyalty to either.

The rise of the radial left (social justice, identity politics, et al) in the West is proof of Perestroika success.

Mossad Infiltration of the Soviet KGB

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 155-158

The best known Soviet spy in history was the late British turncoat, H. A. R. “Kim” Philby. But “the rest of the story” about Philby’s intrigue was kept under wraps for nearly half a century. The truth is Philby was not just a KGB agent. He was also doubling as an agent for yet another intelligence agency—Israel’s Mossad. Only The Spotlight, the Washington-based populist weekly, told the amazing story—one which points to a “hidden history” of intrigue that has been deliberately suppressed by the “mainstream” media in the West.

In its June 25, 1984 issue, The Spotlight reported on a highly-classified summary of East-bloc espionage operations compiled in April of 1984 by Defense Department analysts. (A copy of that report was provided by well-placed sources to Andrew St. George, the chief diplomatic correspondent for The Spotlight.)

The summary cited several instances when covert agents from the KGB, the Soviet Union’s primary intelligence agency, joined forces with agents of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, to penetrate U.S. targets. Philby was among those who provided aid to the Mossad.

The study revealed that veteran CIA official William King Harvey ran afoul of the KGB and the Mossad as early as 1942 when he concluded a high-level investigation with a report denouncing Philby, then a top British counterintelligence official, as a Soviet“mole,” that is, a long-range covert Soviet penetration agent.

At the time, Philby was serving in Washington as the chief liaison officer between British and American intelligence, giving him access to the U.S. government’s most closely guarded security secrets.
What the other evidence in the Pentagon summary regarding Philby revealed—but which went unreported in all of the “mainstream” media accounts of the Philby affair—was that while Philby was spying for the Soviets, he was also working as an agent for the cause of political Zionism since the early 1940s.

A Russian memorial to British Zionist triple agent Kim Philby, who helped the Soviets.

This was well before the emergence of Israel as a sovereign state and the formation of the Mossad, which, according to former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, functions as “the real engine of policy” in Israel.

The Pentagon report revealed that in 1932, Philby was married in Vienna, Austria to Litzi Friedman, a communist organizer who was also active on behalf of the Zionist cause. Present at the nuptials were several key figures who later assumed leading roles in Israeli espionage. Among them were “Teddy” Kollek, who became much better known as the future longtime mayor of Jerusalem, and Jacob Meridor, one of the founders and directors of the Mossad.

When Harvey exposed Philby as a Red spy, he also cast doubt on Philby’s close friend, James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s director of counterintelligence who was also the CIA’s liaison to the Mossad and a faithful supporter of the Zionist cause.

Angleton and the Mossad felt threatened by Harvey’s unmasking of Philby as a Soviet mole. Soon enough, rumours began to circulate in Washington of Harvey’s “heavy drinking” and “scandalous” behaviour, with the rumours being fed directly to the White House.

In 1967, President Johnson fired Harvey from his CIA post and he retired in disgrace. As The Spotlight put it: “The leading American spymaster of the post-World War II era, who had exposed Philby and other major communist spies, spent his last years working for a publishing company in a dead-end job. He died in 1976 of a heart attack, obscure, poorly paid, and lonely.

(Ironically, in recent years, there was a fraudulent attempt to link Harvey to the JFK assassination, with the outlandish suggestion that Harvey had worked hand-in-glove with his longtime enemy,Angleton, and Angleton’s CIA lieutenants, in arranging the president’s murder. Nothing, could be further from the truth.)

In reality, Harvey was right. Philby was ultimately exposed as a major Soviet penetration agent and ultimately confessed, fleeing to Moscow where he ultimately died.

Today’s Russian president Vladimir Putin, a fake nationalist, is from the KGB mold.

Angleton’s fate was somewhat similar. In a long-suppressed top secret report (which was cited in the Pentagon summary described by The Spotlight), a senior CIA security official, C. Edward Petty, concluded that Angleton may have been a Soviet-Israeli penetration agent while he made his way to the top of the CIA bureaucracy.

The Petty report suggested that Angleton, throughout his career as the dominant figure in U.S. counterintelligence, had slipped vital information to both the Soviet Union and Israel. The report was submitted to President Gerald Ford in April of 1975, but a political decision was made that the evidence was not sufficient to indict and try Angleton, largely because it would have been impossible to stage a public trial of an intelligence official who was privy to as many secrets as Angleton was.

Instead, then-CIA director William Colby fired Angleton, enraging the Israeli lobby which had relied for so long on Angleton’s key placement in the counterintelligence bureaucracy. Angleton retired and died a broken man on May 11, 1987.

On December 14, 1998, The Spotlight was the only newspaper on the planet to publish a suppressed fact about the otherwise widely-publicized secrets about KGB espionage that were revealed with the release of the fabled Soviet diplomatic cables that were secretly decrypted beginning in 1946 by the U.S. Army Signals Security Agency and code-named “Venona.”

Military historian Ulick Steadman described the Venona venture as “an historic achievement,” but noted that there was “a shocking twist.” In fact, a vast majority of the alien agents unmasked by the decoded Soviet cables turned out to be active in Zionist circles rather than merely in the Communist underground. According to H. Dexter Gamage, who served as a Pentagon cryptography analyst, the Venona files revealed that Zionists “made up three-fourths of the enemy spies recruited by the Soviets” in the United States.

As a consequence, at the time the Venona project was under way, Gen. Omar Bradley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ordered the intercepts withheld from President Truman, because—according to Steadman—Bradley was “concerned that anything known to the White House would soon become known to the Zionist insiders [surrounding the president] and subsequently to the Soviets” who would discover that their cables were being intercepted.

Beginning in 1995-1996 portions of the Venona decryptions were finally released to great fanfare. However, significant portions of those long top secret documents have never been released, nor was a list of the Kremlin’s spies, each of whom was identified by name and code name.The identity of those spies is most interesting indeed.

In the original Soviet messages, a large number of operatives were marked with the letter “K” for “KRYSY” (i.e.“Rats”). “KRYSY” was the contemptuous Soviet code designation for the Zionist operatives under its control. In the version of these documents made public in the United States, The Spotlight revealed, the “K” designation was erased before release, reportedly by State Department censors.
A review by The Spotlight’s inimitable Andrew St. George of 35 decoded Soviet messages came up with 20 names of Zionist operatives in Moscow’s service. The same documents revealed only four Communist agents who had no apparent ethnic links to Zionism.

These more recent revelations certainly confirm other evidence we have examined that there really was a split at the highest levels between the Zionists and the Russian nationalists in the USSR during thee final days of the Stalin era and well into the years that followed.

This was a major secret element in the development of the Cold War—a rift that laid the groundwork for the rise of the pro-Zionist “neoconservative” network that has ultimately proven to be one of the most dangerous of America’s Enemies Within.

Until American patriots—real patriots—confront and understand these hidden elements within history, which cast a starkly different perspective on the events of the second half of the 20th century, it will be impossible to begin the process of winning back America—in the 21st century—from the hands of the Judas Goats: The Enemy Within.

The old labels of “liberal” and “conservative” just simply do not apply any more and a lot of the legends of the past—particularly of the Cold War era—must be recognized as precisely that: ‘legends.”

In the chapters that follow, we will examine additional evidence pointing to the role of so-called American “anti-communists” in shifting, bending, distortingm and destroying legitimate anti-communist movements for the benefit of the Zionist agenda.

As we shall see, there is much more to the story of the “McCarthy Era” and the “conservative” forces that began to align in that period than we have been led to believe.

Sexual abuse lobby is agenda-ridden

By Bill Donohue
http://www.catholicleague.org

On May 3-4, activists will descend on Albany pressing to lift the statute of limitations on the sexual abuse of minors. Their motives are not pure: their real goal is to stick it to Catholics.
If the lawmakers and activists behind this effort were sincere, they wouldn’t devote an entire day, May 4, to the Catholic Church. Had they chosen to address sexual abuse among Orthodox Jews—and no one else— it would properly be labeled anti-Semitic. That is why this stunt smacks of anti-Catholicism.

Because of sovereign immunity, the public schools are exempt from proposed revisions in the law. To wit: Unless a proposed law explicitly states that the revisions apply equally to the public and private sectors, it means public school victims have only 90 days to bring suit. For private school victims [read: Catholic], they could sue for offenses that occurred decades ago. Get the point?

Even if the playing field were equal in law, there is no organized effort to target the public schools the way Catholic schools are. Consider, for example, the groups invited to speak on May 4. Here are some fast facts:

• One of them is known for advising its supporters how to manipulate the media with “holy childhood photos,” using “feeling” words. It is also known for lying to the media (its leader admitted this under oath). Another official even said that accused priests should not have equal rights.

• An official from a second group has made unsubstantiated charges against the leaders of the Church. How do I know? Because I have repeatedly asked for proof, yet none has ever been provided. This same outfit goes public with the names of accused priests, yet it makes no attempt to confirm the veracity of allegations. Innocent priests are therefore smeared.

• Another group is so extremist that one bishop excommunicated its members. After they appealed to Rome, the Vatican confirmed their excommunication. This is not exactly an everyday occurrence.

These persons are not reasoned critics: they are professional victims’ activists who trot around the nation to promote their hate-filled agenda. That some are funded by Church-suing lawyers is incontestable. Even worse is the invidious stereotype inviting the public to think that the Church owns this problem, and that no reforms have been made.

On May 4, there will be a showing of the movie “Spotlight”; it accurately portrays the misdeeds of the Boston Archdiocese. But it is being used for propaganda purposes to convince the public that nothing has changed, when, in fact, much has: dramatic, and successful, reforms have been implemented in all Catholic institutions. In fact, almost all the abuse took place between 1965 and 1985.

When this story broke in 2002, I was quoted in the New York Times saying, “I will not defend the indefensible.” But I hasten to add that I will also not defend those who seek to exploit this issue to serve their agenda.

According to Dr. Paul McHugh, former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, “Nobody is doing more to address the tragedy of sexual abuse of minors than the Catholic Church.”
In the past ten years, the average number of credible accusations made against 40,000 priests is 8.4. Which means that in any given year, less than 1 percent of priests nationwide have had a credible accusation made against him. Who can beat that record?

It is in the public schools where this problem is most acute today.

• “NYC Public Schools See Record Number of Complaints Against Staffers.” That was the headline in a
Daily News story on January 6, 2016.

• In 2013, it was reported that school officials in New York City tried to fire 128 employees for
molestation, yet only 33 were terminated.

• In 2012, a report covering the previous five years found that 97 tenured teachers or school employees were charged with sexual abuse of students.

What accounts for this condition? Here is a Daily News headline from 2015: “UFT to Blame for Keeping Perverts in City Schools: Chancellor Walcott.” They may not call them “rubber rooms” any more, but nothing has fundamentally changed.

The Catholic Church is not opposed to legal revisions that would allow more time for victims to come forward in the future, but it is opposed to changes allowing for an expanded “look-back” period. We know what this is all about, and it has nothing to do with justice for all.

If lawmakers want to make real changes, let them demand that the clergy and all counselors be added to the list of mandatory reporters. The Church supports such a change. Working against this is the New York Civil Liberties Union and Family Planning Advocates, the lobbying arm of Planned Parenthood. Why? Because that would require Planned Parenthood counselors to report cases of statutory rape that come to their attention, and that is not something they can stomach.

The sexual abuse of minors is a serious problem in our society—it even led to jail time last week for a former Speaker of the House. It demands a serious response, free from politics. Those who harbor an agenda against the Catholic Church have no legitimate role to play in such matters.

Israeli press reveals more Trump ties to Jewish chassidism

The Admor of Bayan

By Moshe Weisberg
November 9, 2016 Anno Domini

Revealed: Donald Trump’s connection to Hasidism in Ian

On the morning after the historic victory of Donald Trump for the U.S. presidency, many parts of the president-elect’s relationship with Judaism and the haredi public are revealed to the B’hadrei Haredim. Trump is one of the donors of the Ruzhin-Bayan yeshiva in Jerusalem.

The morning after the historic victory of Donald Trump for the US presidency, many parts of the president-elect’s relationship with Judaism and the ultra-Orthodox public are exposed. Bardhei Haredim learned that Trump was one of the donors to the Ruzhin-Bayan Yeshiva in Jerusalem.

As is well known, Trump’s clear connection to Judaism lies first and foremost with his daughter Ivanka, who converted to Judaism after marrying her Jewish husband (Jared Kushner). Ivanka appeared during the election campaign at a Chabad synagogue in the United States and even came to the Rebbe of Chabad together with her husband.

As noted above, it turns out that Trump has deep ties with a group of Jews who support the yeshiva of Ruzin Bayan in Jerusalem, who have great admiration and close connection with the Admor of Bayan.

Thus, in the various events held for the Ruzhin Yeshiva in Bayan in the United States by the same group, the President-elect takes part in those events and grants them their support, and occasionally publishes pages of greetings in various journals.

One of the Bahian Hasidim said today to Behadrei Haredim: “It is clear that he is connected to the heart of the Jewish people and there is no doubt that he is one of the righteous gentiles who will only bring good to the people living in Zion”.

Original Article (Hebrew): http://www.bhol.co.il/mobile/article.aspx?id=110677