Leave a comment

28 Comments

  1. dachsielady

     /  December 13, 2014

    It is good to expose Hollywood. It is really a cesspool. There was a Jewish Broadway playwright back in the 50s who exposed how the whole place and all the top actors of the early talkie days were literally card-carrying members of the Communist party. I will have to look up his name later. Even James Stewart, start of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

    The connections between Freemasonry is Jewish Caballa is coming out more and more. The whole Souther Baptist Convention in the USA seems infested with Freemasons for ages, so that makes you wonder about much of the Protestant theology and how it probably was guided by Freemasonic ideology.

    There is belief that child actress Shirley Temple was a victim of CIA (MK ULTRA) mind-control.

    As an adult, and I think in her autobiography told about how she did one movie for MGM studios when she was very young, about 7 or 8 years old. Most of her young day movies were with Fox studios. Anyway, she and her mother went in to MGM studios for the first time to talk about doing the movie. They had little Shirley go into Arthur Freed’s office and her mother go into Louis B. Mayer’s office. Shirley came out and told her mother that Arther Freed was an “exhibitor” meaning he exposed himself to her. Shirley said she just laughed at him and he became angry and kicked her out of his office. Meanwhile, Louis B. Mayer in his office with her mother, “came on” to the mother. The mother and the daughter compared notes when they got out of those offices. I guess they decided to go ahead and do the movie, but if I were the mother, I would have said no to that movie.

    So it seems Hollywood had all the connections –Jewish movie moguls, Freemasonry, Communism, and the CIA from its earliest days.

    “and the light shines on in the darkness and darkness could not overcome it.” John 1:5

    Like

    Reply
  2. Northsider

     /  December 14, 2014

    Surely John Lennon was starwhacked for saying we had the CIA to “thank” for LSD in his famous Playboy interview? I was watching a programme on this subject on a now defunct British alternative channel Richplanet, and when they started quoting Lennon’s words about the CIA suddenly a loud noise blocked out his words. Censorship at its most obvious. A few months later the Richplanet channel was taken off the air for a programme it did about the Drummer Lee Rigby false flag attack in London – a programme that featured the host Richard D. Hall interviewing Nick Kollerstrom about the discrepancies in the official story.

    Also I’ve frequently wondered if the untimely deaths of Buddy Holly, Eddie Cochrane, the Big Bopper and several other American early rock and rollers were not star-whack jobs designed to clear the way for the emergence of the Beatles and the Stones. And did Lynyrd Skynyrd likewise become a starwhack target for defending the South (and post-Watergate Nixon) against Neil Young in the song Sweet Home Alabama?

    Like

    Reply
  3. Passionate and compelling story. I hope someone clues him in on the Jewish issue quickly.

    Like

    Reply
  4. Mary Louise

     /  December 16, 2014

    Scott mentioned the freedom of religious expression afforded to Muslims, Hindus and Bhuddists which is denied to Christians. He significantly failed to mention a certain other religion, the adherents of which are responsible for the fact that Christians don’t have public freedom of expression, and are probably responsible for his current predicaments.
    Perhaps his Evangelical Christianity is blinding him to the truth.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Northsider

     /  January 2, 2015

    Rock bands and pop acts generally get nowhere unless they’re bringing something to the Zio-masonic table. For instance U2 got megahype treatment in the 1980s because they slagged off Irish nationalism, campaigned for the legalisation of divorce in Ireland, and denounced the Church over its anti-birth prevention stance. Not coincidentally Bono has attended the infamous Bohemian Grove gatherings, and is close buddies with the neocons. He once attended the British Labour Party Conference and called war criminal Blair and his then chancellor Gordon Brown “the Lennon and McCartney” of the fight against global poverty. During the run-up to the Irish 1995 divorce referendum, a pro-divorce rally was held in Dublin, which everyone who was anyone in Irish showbiz attended. They knew better than not to. Even Van Morrison, who is of Belfast Jehovah’s Witnesses background, felt duty bound to be there. The evidence that this referendum was rigged is overwhelming, but that’s another story. The Irish easy listening star Dana Rosemary Scallon (who used to make regular appearances on EWTN) stood in the 2011 Irish Presidential election on an anti-abortion and pro-Irish political and economic sovereignty (ie. against the banker takeover of the country) platform. During the campaign she stated categorically that her car had been tampered with in order to kill her. The daughter of a leading Irish GAA sports (Gaelic football) manager who campaigned against abortion and on behalf of the Catholic Pioneer Total Abstinence Movement was murdered in bizarre circumstances while on her honeymoon in Mauritius. An Irish member of parliament Johnny Fox was the only member of the Irish Dail (parliament) to oppose a pro-abortion bill in 1995. A few days later he died from a “heart attack” at a St Patrick’s Day function in his constituency.

    Like

    Reply
  6. Cj aka Elderofzyklons Blog

     /  January 27, 2015

    Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.

    Like

    Reply
  7. Anonymous

     /  December 12, 2015

    You better believe this is happening. To ordinary citizens as well. Let’s get out their secret invisible weapons they use to.

    Like

    Reply
  8. Northsider

     /  April 16, 2016

    Mary Louise: That’s an informative piece about the Lennon killing you linked to. Late 1980 – early 1981 sure was a fraught time. In addition to Lennon’s murder, there was the attempt to whack Reagan, and the Mossad hit on JP II in May 81 (after being shot he said: “They must have known, they must have known” – I think we can all make educated guesses as to who he meant by “they”). Also in February 1981, there was a huge fire that killed 48 at the Stardust nightclub in the heart of the then Irish Prime Minister Charlie Haughey’s constituency in north Dublin. For reasons too long to go into here, I’ve long thought that that was a British intelligence false flag. In the mid-1980s Haughey narrowly escaped drowning after his yacht capsized on a very calm day off the southern Irish coast. This happened a few weeks after he’d questioned in the Irish parliament the man who succeeded him as Irish PM (Goldman Sachs shill Garret Fitzgerald) about his attendance at the MI6 controlled Bilderberg gatherings. Also in the mid-1980s Olaf Palme, the Swedish PM was killed – they didn’t even bother using a Manchurian candidate or inventing a patsy for that one. By the 1990s “pol-whacking” had apparently become second nature to the Zios – (John Smith, Steven Milligan and Robin Cook in Britain alone). In the last six years they’ve tried to kill Nigel Farage at least twice – the most recent attempt being in France last Autumn. Then there’s Bob Crowe the militant union leader, Pim Fortuyn and Jorge Haider…

    Like

    Reply
    • I am also highly suspicious about the Grand Hotel, Brighton, bombing at the 1984 Tory Party Conference. Thatcher was allegedly the target; yet not only was Thatcher unharmed, no bigwig member of the Government was killed, thought Tebbit was injured and his wife paralyzed.
      Surely, if the IRA had wanted to assassinate Maggie they would have succeeded

      Like

  9. Northsider

     /  April 19, 2016

    Mary Louise: Well the IRA has been controlled since at least the time when Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness took over the movement in the early 1980s, so it seems highly probable that Brighton was a false flag. Only a few weeks ago it was revealed that the British security forces had prior knowledge of the 1993 Shankill Road chip shop bomb that was supposedly targeted at the leadership of the loyalist paramilitaries, but ended up killing eight Protestant civilians – as well as the bomber himself. So much for the British Masonic state’s concern for their loyal Protestant subjects in Northern Ireland – it was quite prepared to sacrifice them when it was expedient to do so – in the interests of its divide and conquer agenda. People rightly talk about Operation Gladio and so on, but Ireland (and by extension Britain) is actually the real laboratory of false flag terror.

    Like

    Reply
  10. Northsider

     /  April 21, 2016

    Prince another starwhack victim perchance? Seems strange that a “prank” report last Tuesday said he was dead, and Facebook tribute in response garnered over a million likes – only for it to revealed as a “hoax”. Then two days later he dies for real. He walked around with the word “slave” on his forehead for two years – in reference to record company contract. Also, he ditched the name Prince for same reason, i.e to get out of contract. And if I’m not mistaken his last gig was in Georgia – one of the states at the centre of the “gender neutral bathroom” controversy.

    Like

    Reply
  11. Northsider

     /  April 21, 2016

    Also I neglected to mention that Prince spoke out on the issue of chemtrails. He’s featured on one of Anthony J Hilder’s videos on the subject – not talking to Hilder, but on a black television show. The black comedian Dick Gregory and Mariel Hemingway are also on the video.

    Like

    Reply
  12. Northsider

     /  April 21, 2016

    Infowhore Dice (America’s answer to MI6 asset, Paul Joseph Watson) is already rubbishing idea that Prince could have been killed. Funny how these guys always KNOW – even before the cops – that celebrity deaths are entirely innocent.

    Like

    Reply
    • I had forgotten about Dice. He is still pumping out Youtube videos I take it. Watson and Dice are like Jones. Truth and lies mixed together.

      Like

  13. Northsider

     /  April 22, 2016

    Tim I watched a couple of those Dice vids recently, and his brazen use of NLP techniques is striking. For instance he’ll do a vox pop proposing the introduction of Sharia law to America, and nod his head while asking the question. The very brazenness of the approach is a way of disarming criticism – his get out clause being that he’s just exposing how easy it is to get the sheeple to agree to anything. I know this is a bit off topic for this thread, but he uses a variation of this method to counter well-founded accusations that he’s a shill, i.e. he’ll make a video suggesting that he’s a Rothschild disinfo agent – and the very fact that he’s sending up such allegations himself is supposed to convince you that he can’t possibly be any such thing – or better still make you feel embarrassingly gauche for believing the accusers. It’s a very basic technique that requires neither wit nor imagination, but it can be very effective, especially with modern half-educated folk – whose greatest fear is being seen to be uncool.

    Like

    Reply
    • These alternative media double agents really believe in this NLP stuff. It’s nothing more than word magic. Did you ever see that video of Dice acting totally weird in front of the camera, like he was in a trance or something?

      Like

  14. Northsider

     /  April 22, 2016

    Dice’s pimps have clearly chosen him to be the Zio-debunker in chief, when it comes to the “starwhacking” phenomenon. Even by the standards of Infowhores he’s an unbelievably scummy low-life. For instance he had a video up within minutes of the official announcement of Prince’s death. It was titled something like “Prince Murdered By Illuminati over chemtrails”. Needless to say the title was completely misleading clickbait – as the video is the usual argument-free attempt to debunk the idea of star-whacking. I’m not prejudging the question of whether or not Prince was whacked (though the incriminating evidence seems to be mounting), but surely it’s a sign of something fishy when the Zios feel the need to assign one of their alt-presstitutes the task of rubbishing allegations even before they’ve been made – a sort of “pre-emptive debunk” if you like. We’ve all heard the phrase “getting your retaliation in first” but this takes it to a completely new level.

    Like

    Reply
  15. Northsider

     /  April 27, 2016

    Tim I looked at that vid after you mentioned in one of your other vids about Infowars. If I’m not mistaken he and his army of shill/trolls tried to explain it all away as a spoof – the joke supposedly being on those who took it seriously. But why would you even think of making a video like that – even as a spoof – unless you were seriously weird to start with? There’s no amusement value in it at all – unless that is, it’s referencing some arcane rituals that outsiders are unaware of.

    Dice also puts up silly videos of David Rockefeller and Jacob Rothschild talking on the phone, about getting him to infiltrate the alternative movement, or whatever, in order to ridicule those who accuse him of precisely this.

    As for his Vox Pop beachfront videos, my guess is that the participants aren’t so much dumb, as obliging, i.e. he preps them on what he wants them to say beforehand and they go along just to be friendly. .

    Like

    Reply
    • I agree. His defense that it was a spoof seems highly unlikely. Jay Leno does this comic segment called Jay Walkers, which bears a striking resemblance to Dice’s beachfront videos. The cynical bend to them seems to offer little to the viewer other than to foster learned helplessness. It also gives the Left more bad ideas with which to run. “Hey, now that you mention it, maybe we should do that.” Isn’t that NLP too?

      Like

  16. Northsider

     /  April 30, 2016

    This whole “hey dude, lighten up, I’m just messing with the enemy’s head” is a very handy get out clause. You can retrospectively justify just about anything with it. I’m not saying it isn’t true on occasion – irony, and humour generally, can be and should be used, as they’re very powerful weapons – but it also has the potential to seriously muddy the waters. For instance I heard Andrew Anglin on Duke the other day justifying his very nasty comments about blacks etc on the grounds that he wants to widen the window of what’s acceptable to say in alt-right circles – and that it’s all really a joke at the expense of the Zio-media thought controllers. That sounds quite plausible until you discover that Anglin went along with the Ziomedia narratives about Isis being rabidly anti-American (instead of being funded and directed by America, Israel, Britain and Turkey) and also attacked “conspiracy theories” about Zionist involvement in events such as the Charlie Hebdo Paris “attacks”. Then you start to wonder who the joke is really on.

    Like

    Reply
    • I wonder why most of those neo-nazis are against conspiracy theories, despite that Jews are often involved in them. Perhaps they subconsciously know that these conspiracies will unravel their Hitler worship. Not really sure though. Maybe it’s simple not “manly” and “white” to believe in such things.

      Like

  17. Northsider

     /  April 30, 2016

    Tim, that’s a good point about the Hitler worshippers fearing that their worldview will unravel if conspiracy theories are vindicated. I’m sure you’ve heard of Ken Livingstone’s current tribulations over tentatively implying that Zionists and Nazis worked together. Doubtless the white nats are almost as furious with him as the Zio-media are. I think there may be something similar going on re false flag terror. The white nats are attached to the idea that Muslims do these things, because they assume the public perception of Muzzies as terrorists helps the anti-immigrant cause. In my view, paradoxically it does the opposite, because the media and Soros funded NGOS can point to all the peaceful Muslims and make them into figures of sympathy – victims of vicious Islamophobia. Terrorism helps divert the debate away from whether these folk should be in the west at all. By talking up Islamic terrorism, the white nats are unwittingly (or in some cases wittingly) conceding the premise that immigration is ok as long as the migrants don’t go around shooting up restaurants and planting bombs.

    I have mixed feelings about Duke. His videos are often little short of brilliant – no race baiting, just exposure of the racism of Jewish supremacists, but his radio show is often very repetitive, and some of his views on things like evolution are distinctly dubious. Having said that even on his radio show he makes some valuable points. I definitely don’t think he’s a shill but he can be very naïve. For instance he complained recently that the media whitewash Muslim terror by never showing the bodies of the victims of attacks like Paris or Brussels. Well duh! Maybe that’s because there are no “bodies”, or the “bodies” didn’t die in the way the media say they did.

    As for Anglin, my personal view is he’s a phoney.

    Like

    Reply
    • I like Duke too but couldn’t care less for the rest of them, Anglin et al. I like Mike Delaney too, but he has faded out. His Missing Links documentary was excellent, but he didn’t really go anywhere after that. You make some good points about the distraction the Islamic terrorism narrative provides. I plan to do a piece soon on the Islamization of Europe. The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit book has a really good section where Jones talks about the Jews using the Muslims against Christians in Middle Ages and beyond. I agree with Jones when he criticizes white nationalists for not identifying as Catholics first and foremost, but I also agree with Dr. Kevin MacDonald that whites tend towards traits which draw them to civility and, ultimately, Christianity. I try to draw from both of these excellent scholars in forming competent views regarding faith and race.

      Like

  18. God Bless you In Christ Jesus Name Amen

    Like

    Reply
  19. Thank You

    Like

    Reply
  20. kingedward1wasright1290

     /  October 24, 2018

    The National Socialists didn´t support Zionism, they actually rejected it and favored over the Palestinians. Adolf Hitler demanded liberty and independence for Palestine and had a meeting with the Palestinian nationalist Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1941. In his famous book “Mein Kampf”, Hitler recognized Zionism as tool for international Jewish power.

    Other National Socialists concluded the same, such as Arno Schickedanz who published an article entitled “Der Zionism (Zionism)” in which he explained: “Non-Jewish observers and writers on Zionism, who see political Zionism only as an attempt at “national renewal” rather than an effort to establish a unified Jewish leadership as well as Jewish rule over the world, are therefore incorrect. The confusion of political Zionism with Palestine can be understood only through the Jewish prophecies in which Jewry is assured of control over all the goods of this world. Knowing that the time was near, and would culminate in taking possession of Palestine, Zionism developed the nonsensical notion of an “historic claim” to the “promised land,” to which Jews “without any outside pressure” would gradually emigrate. In the ideology of political Zionism, Palestine fulfilled the role of an indispensable part of prophecy, just as certain rules are the guarantee for success in the magical ceremonies of primitive peoples.

    Political Zionism never intended Palestine to be the destination of all Jews, but rather it merely wants to make Palestine the center of Jewish world policy. That must naturally be protected by a strong Jewish population. The Zionist publication Jüdische Rundschau wrote: “No one at any time has proposed that all Jews today should emigrate to Palestine.” Nahum Sokolow, Weizmann’s colleague and current chairman of the Zionist Committee, said it clearly in 1921: “The Jewish people wants to return to Palestine; the Jewish people will have its center in Palestine. Large parts of Jewry will live as a Jewish periphery in the world. They must be cared for; their dignity and their national rights must be assured.” […] That provides a correction to the idealization of Zionism, which springs from a different race. From a political standpoint, it would be in the interests of the whole world, of all the host peoples, if the Jews now scattered throughout the whole world were to voluntarily emigrate to some habitable territory. If political Zionism were not interested in such a solution to the Jewish Question, it would be in the interests of the host peoples to point it in that positive direction.

    The only question would be whether Palestine is the proper gathering place, which no one would likely maintain. Palestine is not able to absorb all the Jews in the world, entirely aside from the fact of increasing Arab opposition to Jewish infiltration. The Arabs are, after all, the undisputed owners of the land. But what other territory would be appropriate? And at the instant Palestine ceased to be the goal of Jewish emigration, political Zionism would collapse, since Palestine is seen as a means for the fulfillment of prophecy. Without that, the whole enterprise would lose its point.

    Jewry itself would make the most passionate and bitter attacks, and before long any undertaking that ignored Palestine would be crippled by Jewry itself. Palestine incorporates for Jewry its special position. Ignoring this would be ethnic suicide for Jewry, since political Zionism also has as a goal maintaining and strengthening Jewry’s special situation.“ http://www.judithwinther.dk… The Jewish professor Jeffrey Herf confirmed in his book “The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust” that the National Socialists considered Zionism as a part of a Jewish conspiracy: “In the Nazi view, Zionism remained in the context of a conspiracy.

    Hitler himself presented an early version of this view in Mein Kampf, when he contemptuously rejected the “lie” that Zionism was primarily a movement focused on creation of a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. “For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” For Hitler and the Nazi regime, Jewish immigration to Palestine could never be part of a “solution,” final or otherwise, to “the Jewish question” in Europe. Nazi opposition to a Jewish state was rooted in the core ideological conviction that a Jewish state in Palestine would become a component, or perhaps the very headquarters, of “international Jewry’s” efforts to dominate the globe. Alfred Rosenberg, though also convinced of the existence of a Jewish conspiracy, showed less alarm about Zionism in his essays of the 1920s and 1930s than Hitler did. Rosenberg’s key text on the subject was Der Staatsfeindliche Zionismus (Zionism hostile to the state), which he initially published in 1921 and which the main Nazi publishing house brought out again in 1938. In it he argued that the Jews were incapable of statecraft.

    If a Jewish state in Palestine were to be established, it would collapse and again the Jews would become an “international nation.” Zionism was “the ineffectual effort of an incapable people to engage in productive activity. Mostly it was a means for ambitious speculators to establish a new arena for receiving usurious interest on a global scale.” In the midst of WWII, Hitler’s view that a Jewish state would provide another base for the international Jewish conspiracy displaced Rosenberg’s contempuous dismissal and fostered a convergence of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. Giselher Wirsing’s Engländer, Juden, Araber in Palästina (The English, the Jews and the Arabs in Palestine), published in 1939 … defined the Zionist goal as the “establishment of a Vatican of world Jewry. A firm base is to be built on which in later years Jewish world policy can rest.” Wirsing argued that a Jewish state would foster cooperation between the Jews in Palestine and the assimilated Jews who worked in finance and banking in Western Europe and the United States, thereby strengthening their existing political and economic power.“
    http://www.judithwinther.dk/emner/niveau_3/hoaxfact/der_zionismus.html

    Like

    Reply
  21. kingedward1wasright1290

     /  October 24, 2018

    This is why Adolf Hitlers Germany was destroyed because it broke free of the international hyenas of world fiance.

    Newly married couples were paid interest-free loans of up to 1,000 RM (Reichsmark) for the purchase of consumer goods. The loan had to be repaid at 1% per month, but 25% of the loan was issued for each new born child. So if a family had four children, the loan was paid in full.

    The same principle has been applied with regard to housing loans which have been issued for a period of ten years at a low interest rate. The birth of each child also led to the deletion of 25% of the loan to the fourth child, with which the loan debt was completely cancelled.

    The farmers also benefited. Between 1933 and 1936 more than 91,000 farmsteads were built in Germany. In 1935 the agricultural inheritance law was introduced. It ensured that all holdings larger than 15 hectares would only be transferred by family reunion.

    All trade unions were united into an organization called Deutsche Arbeitsfront (German Labor Front). The rights of workers were protected by a Social Court of Honor, which laid down the conditions of employment. These schemes were better than any comparable legislation in the world at that time – and even to this day. As a result of the harmonious relationship between employer and employee there were no more strikes.

    Taxation of workers, especially those with families, has been greatly reduced.

    The Reichsarbeitsdienst was created 1934 under the direction of Konstantin Hierl. It initially served to combat unemployment. Later he was required for all men between 18 and 25 years of age for a period of six months as compulsory. Its members came from all classes of society. He served for various civil, agricultural and construction projects. One of his main goals was to communicate camaraderie.

    The organization mother and child was created for the welfare, health, safety and financial support of pregnant women and mothers with children. To support their needs, more than 30,000 local centers, kindergartens, children’s day care centers have been provided. Mothers with inadequate funds were paid child benefits.

    On July 14, 1933, the law for the prevention of hereditary offspring was created. This law promoted the spread of valuable, healthy newborns, and at the same time prevented a progeny of hereditary people, which meant a heavy burden on the community.

    For the young people (10 to 13 year old boys), the Hitlerjugend (14 to 18 year old boys), the Jungmädelbund (10 to 13 year old girls), and the federation of German girls (14 to 18 year old girls), organizations were established to sign And prepare young people for citizenship and nation.

    Sports and recreation were actively promoted. All major commercial and public concerns with recreation in shipyards, sports grounds, swimming pools, modern canteens with separate smoking rooms were freely provided. In August 1936, the Olympic Games took place in Berlin and were a complete success. Germany was the most successful nation with 100 medals, including 41 gold.

    Summer camps were provided at subsidized prices, while sea voyages on large cruise ships abroad were made possible with the “Kraft durchFreude” program. These journeys were available to workers earning more than 300 RM per month, but those workers who earned 200 RM or less were preferred. The British government did not allow these ships to dock in England, for fear that their oppressed workers would learn the truth about working conditions in Germany.

    Most Christian confessions were tolerated in Hitler’s Germany, and the two great churches, the Evangelical Lutheran and the Roman Catholic, were subsidized by the state. On September 10, 1933, Hitler decided a concordat with the Vatican.

    Since churches are focused on spiritual things rather than on secular matters, worshipers returned to their church in increasing numbers. During the Third Reich, 640 new churches were built. It was not unusual for a priest or priest to complete his ministry with the words “God Bless The Leader”.

    (Remark by Thyl Steinemann: Imagine, today a priest in the pulpit would complete the service with the words “God bless our government!”)

    In the winter of 1933-1934, the winter relief was known as a great relief for the work. This was done to help the millions of poor and unemployed. Those who had a job were asked to donate a small portion of their wages to the unemployed in exchange for a glass or a wooden badge. On the first Sunday of each month, families with a good income prepared a stew dish and donated the money for fuel, etc. to the needy, who could enjoy a hot meal in a large common kitchen. More than 17 million unemployed, day labourers were widows and orphans who were supported by these charitable efforts of the people.

    In terms of crime, one of Hitler’s first antitags was to disarm the police and remove their rubber nicks. He did so to make people feel less threatened and gain more understanding of the role of the police. At the same time, a law relaxed the private possession of weapons. Crime fell to very low levels, while drug addicts were unknown.

    The protection of the rights of the animals was an important concern of the National Socialists, who created a law in this sense, namely the Reichstiersschutzgesetz. The Reichsnaturschutzgesetz was a notice of 26 June 1935. It was one of the most progressive laws of its time and included the long-term forest management, which is still used today for the reforestation of forests.
    https://nationalconscience.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/1945-tyskland-star-i-brand-riket-ar-skandat-ett-valdtaget-land-svinen-har-fullbordat-valdtakten-pa-annu-ett-land/

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: