Lessons in controlled opposition from Ted Turner’s WCW wrestling

Hollywood Hogan and his band of nWo rebels during their reign of Ted Turner’s WCW wrestling.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 24, 2018 Anno Domini

A unique thing happened in the sports-entertainment industrial complex in the 1990s that has many parallels to today’s theatrical political arena.

“Billionaire Ted” Turner’s extremely popular World Championship Wrestling(WCW) programs on TNT was atop the television ratings largely due to a controlled-opposition stable that became known as the “nWo”, or New World Order—a theme introduced by the show’s biggest star Hulk Hogan (Terry Bollea) when he became a “heel” (bad guy) for the first time in his career as a professional wrestler.

The public, mainly an audience of males in their teens and early twenties, perceived the nWo stable as a band of cool rebels that invaded the wrestling company from Trump crony Vince McMahon’s World Wrestling Federation(now WWE). The stable, created by WCW executive producer Eric Bishoff, appeared to be causing general havoc, disrupting the programing, starting brawls, and just taking over the show—and the public completely ate it up as real (it was really the beginning of reality TV). Little did the fans know that WCWwas behind the nWo stable and portraying it as a threat to WCW. It even got to a point where the stable was rebranding WCW, complete with logos and all. Turner even allowed nWo character Scott Hall to seemingly defame him as “Billionaire Ted”. Then the controlled opposition started to create its own controlled opposition (Wolfpac, LWO, OWN, etc.), until there were various stables all feuding with each other. This went on for a good four or five years before the suspension of disbelief started to wear down and the fans became bored with the psyop. It eventually led to falling ratings and a real-life takeover by McMahon, who ended WCWand globalist Turner’s short-lived venture into the wrestling business. But during its peak, the psyop angle was so successful that McMahon seemingly could only compete by turning his own wrestling promotion into a soft-porn show. It was pure smut. Even with frequent staged “nip slips” from its many porn-star-like female characters and constant homo-eroticism among many of the males, McMahon could barely keep up with the Turner/Bischoff nWo novelty.

Zionist/Marixist-controlled opposition and actor Donald Trump slams Vince McMahon through a table at Wrestlemania.

The use of political themes and psyops is nothing new to the wrestling business, as deception lies at the heart of its craft, with its largely fake beatings and body slams and glorified soap-opera storylines. Up until then, McMahon’s company had been incorporating political narratives into their storylines; for example, the Sgt. Slaughter angle as it relates to the first Gulf War, Desert Storm, and the “Bolsheviks”, a Russian tag team that was castigated in comic-book fashion. But WCW’s nWo stable was relatively new and presented in a more sophisticated and believable manner. The psyop revealed how its young, male audience could be deceived—through the use of fake, controlled opponents—something that is also key in the intelligence and political world and has been since ancient times. Since this period in professional wrestling, the sport has never been as popular. It’s ratings have not reached such highs as when the nWo was ruling and reigning the wrestling world.

Today’s political situation is almost entirely based on this same controlled-opposition psyop, whether it’s the Zionist-Marxist-globalist-controlled Trump and Putin, Julian Assange and Wikileaks, Qanon, neo-Nazis, Alex Jones, and many more. They’re all part of the real-life soap-operatic NWO stable. In fact, Trump himself has appeared in McMahon’s wrestling shows, posing as a fake opposition to McMahon, like in the “Battle of the Billionaires” drama.

In today’s post-truth world, where deception and deviation are the norm, reality TV is not confined to the sports stadiums. It’s played out on the TV news, in the alternative media, and through the ones we put our trust in to be sincere truth tellers and opponents of this madness. So, we must constantly have our guards up and continually use our discernment to identify and root out these traitors.

Fox TV’s The Americans demoralizes and perpetuates old Soviet tricks

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 20, 2018 Anno Domini

Sex, violence, and familial dysfunction make up the bulk of Fox television’s drama series The Americans, but Hollywood has given us the added bonus of KGB propaganda.

When your writing sucks and you need to keep the audience hooked before you unleash your indoctrination on them, how do you accomplish this? With sex and violence, of course. This is how Hollywood has done it since the Production Code was abolished. 

Thus, Keri Russell, who plays the mother Elizabeth Jennings, and Matthew Rhys, who plays the father Philip Jennings, when they aren’t having sex with each other as crypto-communist all-American parents, are out banging targets on their assassination-and-blackmail list, be they gay, straight, white, or black. They are super KGB agents, after all, and sex and espionage go hand in hand. They even get their teenaged daughter, Paige (Holly Taylor), in on the action late in the series. And even though Paige and her mother are petite females, the unrealistic script has them kicking the snot out of any would-be enemies, no matter how big.

Jewish CIA agent-turned TV writer Joseph Weisberg’s insidious TV show is about the lives of KGB assassin parents living in 1980s Washington DC, loosely based on the illegals program of that era. Give Fox FX credit, though. They managed to drag out this tired, poorly written story for six seasons despite extremely low ratings and just about zero audience satisfaction (the bad guys always win). It portrays the villains as ideological heroes—something that is almost never the case with KGB agents (defectors have reported that at least 90 percent of agents are so due to blackmail, not ideology) and the good guys as bumbling fools, like FBI counterintelligence agent Stan Beeman (Noah Emmerich), who can’t even discern his across-the-street neighbours, the Jennings, as two of the primary assassins responsible for most of the murder and mayhem going on around him.

The acting is decent, but the speech patterns are atrocious. I guess the directors weren’t sharp enough to realize that East Coasters didn’t uptalk during the 1980s (few people did anywhere in the world). Or perhaps they did know but chose to perpetuate the ongoing degradation of English speech—to which Hollywood has largely contributed.

Now lets get to the point—the culmination of six brutal seasons. The bumbling good guys don’t get to figure out the true identity of the Jennings until the last couple of episodes. But by that time, it’s too late and the villains pretty much escape unharmed—the Jennings parents back to Russia, the kids to elsewhere in the United States. Beneath all this, the plot is building up the case that Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev is a reformer who is attempting to democratize Russia (so called Perestroika and Glasnost) and that pretty soon, the Jennings won’t have to go on murdering for the KGB and they can, instead, lead a somewhat normal life. The way the writers transition the Jennings from seemingly enjoying all the killing to then becoming disillusioned is poorly established. The Perestroika deception is then furthered when the Jennings begin to rebel against their KGB handlers, who they learn are about to stage a coup against Gorbachev (something that the real-life mainstream media portrayed as authentic without a shred of skepticism) in order to keep the Soviet empire intact. The easily-turned Jennings attempt to sabotage events that presumably lead up to the coup, but the show ends before the “August Coup” gets to happen.

Nearly two decades after the real-life staged and fake “August Coup”, communist saboteurs in America, like the writers of The Americans, are still hocking the Perestroika deception. With all that we have learned from countless defectors about how the Soviet leadership remained intact after the so called collapse of communism and the name change, how the country was looted by mainly Jewish-Russian oligarchs, and how the KGB continued to rule and reign through an organized crime-run government, the writers chose to stick with the old lies.

In addition to deceiving the American people about the true fate of the communist world power, The Americans achieves another objective: what KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov called the demoralization phase of a multi-pronged long-term Soviet strategy. The gratuitous sex and violence alone is enough to demoralize the audience. Throw in with that the glorification of Marxist values and the demonization of Western values, and you have completely poisoned the average weak-minded TV watcher. And perhaps the demoralizing nature of the show had a direct effect on the cast themselves, as Keri Russell divorced her real-life husband Shane Deary as she allegedly pursued one with her on-screen husband Matthew Rhys. This shows us that even the propagandists themselves cannot escape the consequences of their own crafting.

Ultimately, this show requires a huge investment of time with pretty much zero cathartic value and mediocre entertainment at best—Soviet propaganda aside.

Alex Jones may have been a Soviet asset all along

A capture of Jones’ Russian visa from earlier this year. What was Jones doing in Russia? We can only guess. Perhaps being debriefed by the POLITBURO. Fellow fake conservative and disinfo artist Jack Posobiec tweeted that the visa is a three-year, multi-entry business visa.

Timothy Fitzpatrick
September 8, 2018 Anno Domini

What if this entire time, self-proclaimed American patriot radio host Alex Jones had been working for the Soviet power bloc in Russia and the East?

Would it be so difficult to believe? Could Russia have used him all this time to divide, distract, and radicalize the American populace as a means of weakening it for a final Marxist takeover?

Everything that has been levelled against Jones by his staunchest critics, myself included, namely that he is a Likudnik Zionist in the employ of Benjamin Netanyahu and the gangster-run Israeli government and that he is a counter-intelligence operative, could easily fit into an all-encompassing Soviets-dunnit narrative. He could very well be all a: Zionist, intelligence asset, freemason, neocon, and Soviet agent. In fact, these nefarious groups have all worked together for decades for mutual goals. Most of the time, it’s difficult to tell one from the other. Let the reader realize that the Soviet Union is run mostly by high-level freemasons and communist Jews who are loyal to the Marxist state of Israel. I use the present tense because the Soviet Union still secretly exists. It merely changed its flag and name for public consumption. The world communist conspiracy persists.

When looking back at all the questionable things Jones has done over the years in determining his loyalty to the West, I think back to the infamous Y2K (year 2000) scare in which Jones, then fairly new to the patriot movement, actively participated. Late conspiracy researcher William Cooper documented and analyzed this event with astounding prescience. He rightfully called Jones a fear mongering “bullshit artist”. He may have been the first to sound the alarm over Jones’ sincerity. During that night, Dec. 31, 1999, a point in time when all kinds of doom had been predicted and many people were on edge, Jones basically attempted to deceive his listeners into believing that the Russians were invading or carrying out some kind of major aggression against the United States. It wasn’t true. So, why did Jones lie about it? Was it merely another of his many scare tactics to whip up his listeners or was there something more?

Soviet human butcher Josef Stalin apparently was fascinated by the fake news of his day—something that fit naturally for a lying Soviet such as himself. Orson Welles’ fake news broadcast of a UFO invasion of America from H.G. Well’s The War of the Worlds especially interested Stalin. Stalin saw the obvious uses for fake news of this kind in manipulating the American populace and the West. If average Americans could be coaxed into brandishing firearms and firing them at imaginary space aliens in the sky, what else could they be tricked into doing? Author Annie Jacobsen writes that Wells’ fiction inspired Stalin and the Soviets to orchestrate the alleged UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico—an event that would go on to shape UFO folklore and even, to some degree, the conspiracy movement. Since that time, the Soviets have perfected their fake-news psychological operations. Who knows how many of these kinds of operations have been foisted on unsuspecting Western populations. Countless, no doubt. As it turns out, Wells met with Stalin in 1934. Does that mean Wells was a Soviet asset, too? Perhaps, as Wells himself claimed to be further Left than Stalin. He was a staunch Leftist involved in such things as the formation of the globalist/communist League of Nations. For all we know, The War of the Worlds broadcast over CBS radio that caused a public panic in the United States on Halloween in 1938 could have been a Soviet orchestration. Perhaps as Soviet mockery as to the source of this apparent psyop, the opening theme to the CBS broadcast was Tchaikovsky’s piano concerto No. 1.

Back to Jones, his fake news regarding the Soviet invasion during his Y2K broadcast may have been yet another of the POLITBURO’s psych warfare campaigns to test out the gullibility of their enemies. Many people believe that Jones began his career as a legitimate truther patriot and then later became compromised, but the continuity between now and the Y2K incident is apparent. Divide, distract, and radicalize. After writing dozens of articles critiquing Jones and his position as an anti-truther controlled-opposition agent and studying him for years, this seems to be the best conclusion to which I can come for his purpose in the patriot/truther movement—he is an agent provocateur, a stochastic terrorist. And it aligns perfectly with Vladimir Lenin’s prescriptions of establishing divisive agents of influence in the West as part of a long-range strategy of demoralizing and destabilizing it.

Jones’ neoconish style seems largely derived from the Jewish-controlled John Birch Society—a movement set up to roundup and neuter legitimate conservatives and nationalists. As with other Jewish-controlled anti-Communist movements, like the Trotskyite American Jewish League Against Communism,the Birch Society unsurprisingly has been completely ineffective at stopping the global communist threat and has delivered rather shallow blows against it. For instance, where was the Birch Society when the Soviets staged the fake “August Coup” against Gorbachev and the collapse of the USSR? If anyone should have exposed this colossal hoax, it should have been JBS. By leading their own opposition through fake movements, Judeo-Bolsheviks are able to control their opposition. Alex Jones appears to be one such controlled-opposition agent, luring unknowing nationalists down an alley that leads nowhere. The Soviet Trust is another good example of the depths the Soviets have gone to control their opposition. American Thinker writer Ricardo Galván Estrada seems to believe Jones is part of a crypto-communist campaign against the West and compares his rhetoric to that of Russian Foreign Intelligence Services operative Vicky Pelaez.

The original RT (Russia Today). Nothing but a communist rag.

It’s no coincidence that today, the two major powers (really they are one and the same power) Jones refuses to criticize is Soviet power in Russia, which he doesn’t even admit exists, and Jewish power, which Jones protégé Paul Joseph Watson says he doesn’t really see “big Jewish influence…Jewish people aren’t really that present…you don’t really notice them anywhere”. The COMINTERN appears comfortable in allowing assets like Jones to blame the Chinese Communists, but that’s as far as they will let him and others go. And that’s all that is really needed in legitimizing Jones’ fake anti-Communism to his unsuspecting audience—the Chinese Communism angle serving as a limited hangout. Blaming China is a “nothing burger”, as Neocons like Jones like to say. For China is openly Communist. Russia, as the crypto-Communist power, is the one to finger, yet Jones goes along with the establishment narrative that Russia is now a fascist, thus conservative, nation, which has long since abandoned communism. Forget about Jones lying about Soviet manipulation of U.S. elections, which they have been doing since long before Trump came along, he won’t even expose Russian false-flag terrorism—something that used to be the bread and butter of his credibility. It’s no wonder Soviet-controlled Russia Today has featured Alex Jones on its broadcast hundreds of times. Jones defends Russia just about as much as he defends Israel when it comes to geopolitical conflicts, poisonings, false flags, espionage, obvious corruption,or otherwise.

During an Infowars interview with a Russia Today host, Zionist-denier Max Keiser told Jones “Vladimir Putin says to say hello, by the way.” Jones replied that he was “told by the head of RT America, before they even launched it, like eight, nine years ago, Putin’s a big listener.” Incidentally, on February 1 of this year, Alex Jones bragged on Twitter about his ties with Russia by posting a photo of a Russian visa granted to Jones by Russia (at top of this article) with the statement: “Looking forward to Putin giving me the new hashtags to use against Hillary and the dems…”. That same day, Infowars lackey Jack Posobiec tweeted that it was a three-year, multi-entry business visa.

The United States Office of the Director of National Intelligence correctly stated that Russia Today and other Soviet media outlets have been campaigning to “undermine faith in the US Government and fuel political protest.” Nobody in the American media has done this more than Jones, whether it’s fuelling racial tensions or getting Americans to distrust their government. And he has been doing this for years, not just in the run-up to the last U.S. federal election. Jones and his comrades have perhaps been Russia’s best troll farm. It has not gone unnoticed by the Soviets, as Putin is purported to have praised Jones and Putin’s prophet Alexander Dugin has publicly done as much.

For an exhaustive examination of Alex Jones, see this dossier.

Mossad’s manipulation of the world

Excerpts from Israeli Mossad defector Victor Ostrovsky’s second book in his whistleblower series.

(Disclaimer: Ostrovsky may be a false opposition defector who leaks some truths as part of a Limited Hangout campaign to muddy the water overall. For example, he doesn’t explain what really happened when Israel helped the Soviets stage a fake coup against Gorbachev {see below}, but I tend to think Ostrovsky simply didn’t realize what was actually going on. Regardless, I think there is enough truth in his books to help us understand the bigger picture. —Timothy Fitzpatrick)

The Other Side of Deception (1994)
By Victor Ostrovsky

Jewish Banksters Finance Mossad

“Had this been a normal Mossad operation, he could have gotten as much money as he wanted from a bank sayan-a Jewish banker who is regarded as trustworthy and will open the bank for you at any time and provide as much money as needed”
—pg. 150

Mossad Feeds U.S. Intelligence Disinformation

“Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes. It brought about the air strike of Libya that President Reagan had promised-a strike that had three important consequences. First, it derailed a deal for the release of the American hostages in Lebanon, thus preserving the Hizballah (party of God) as the number one enemy in the eyes of the West. Second, it sent a message to the entire Arab world, telling them exactly where the United States stood regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict. Third, it boosted the Mossad’s image of itself, since it was they who, by ingenious sleight of hand, had prodded the United States to do what was right.”
—pg. 116

“By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan, which was only activated during heavy communication traffic hours. Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world (or, as they were called by the Libyans, Peoples’ Bureaus). As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it.”
—pg. 115

Mossad Creates and Controls Islamic Extremist Groups and Uses Them As Patsies

“Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.”
—pg. 197

Mossad Tests Chemical Weapons on Civilians

“It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Ziyyona facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory-ABC standing for atomic, bacteriological, and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed [Sampson Option], there was no room for error. The Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.”
—pg. 188

Mossad Frames People as Nazis to Discredit Them

“Ran had realized at some point in mid-1987 that trouble was on the horizon. There was growing dissatisfaction in the Mossad and in the right-wing elements of the Israeli government regarding the behaviour of Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who was defying direct Israeli warnings regarding his relationship with the Austrian leader Kurt Waldheim, who’d been branded a Nazi. (The branding was done by a field unity of Al that entered a UN building on Park Avenue South in New York and placed several incriminating documents that had been removed from other files into Waldheim’s file and the files of a few other individuals-for future use. The falsified documents were then discovered by Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Benjamin Netanyhu, as part of a smear campaign against Waldheim, who was critical of Israeli activities in southern Lebanon.) [Uwe Barschel was assassinated later by Mossad]
—pgs. 228-229

Mossad Control International Media

“He then wanted to hear as much as I could tell him about Robert Maxwell, the British newspaper magnate. His reason was that they were aware of the constant Mossad interest in purchasing media so that it could both influence public opinion and use journalism as a cover for inserting agents into countries.

“He identified Maxwell as a Mossad agent and also reminded me of other occasions on which the Mossad had been behind the purchase of newspapers in England. As an example, he gave the Eastern African, which was bought with Mossad money by an Israeli businessman. The purchase was made, he said, to assist the South African propaganda machine in making apartheid more palatable in the West….Maxwell was a sayan on a grand scale.”
—pg. 203

“I explained to my host, as I had to the British, that in the beginning the Mossad would help Maxwell purchase the newspapers by lending him money and causing labour disputes and other problems, making the target purchases more vulnerable. Later, the tactics changed; they would target in advance a paper that he was to purchase and start it on a collision course with bankruptcy using all available strategies, starting with workforce agitation and ending with pullback of funds from the paper through bankers and advertisers sympathetic to the Mossad. Then, once the target was softened, they’d send Maxwell in for the kill.”
—Pg. 204

Mossad Made Saddam Hussein into a Villian Despite the Fact that Israel Considered Him a Moderate

Ephraim had spelled it out for me and confirmed some of the information I’d already known. He then went on. “After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We are starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt it’ll work.” (spoken before the Gulf War)
—pg. 117

“The Mossad had all but saturated the intelligence field with information regarding the evil intentions of Saddam the Terrible, banking on the fact that before long, he’d have enough rope to hang himself.”

It was clear what the Mossad’s overall goal was. It wanted the West to do its bidding, just as the Americans had in Libya with the bombing of Qadhafi. After all, Israel didn’t possess carriers and ample air power, and although it was capable of bombing a refugee camp in Tunis, that was not the same. The Mossad leaders knew that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he’d been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear.”
—pg. 254

Mossad Destabilizes Countries Through Various Means Including Civil Anarchy, Arming Religious Fanatics, and Assassinations

“As long as it was political, it was fine, but now the Mossad is plunging headlong into this shit. They’ve decided that it’s time to destabilize Jordan to the point of civil anarchy.”

“Destabilize? How?”

“A high influx of counterfeit currency, causing distrust in the market; arming religious fundamentalist elements similar to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood; and assassinating leading figures who are symbols of stability, causing riots in the universities and forcing government to respond with harsh measures and lose popularity.

“Wasn’t the Mossad running weapons to the Egyptian fundamentalists through Afghanistan or something?”

“That’s right.”
—pg. 143

Mossad Behind Privatization Schemes

“The French wanted me to see what information I could gather on some people who, they were worried, were out to destabilize their South Pacific colonies. The plan of these supposed “destabilizers” was to privatize a small country as a model for the world (in other words, create a small political system in which there is no government ownership and see if that model can be extrapolated to a wider setting). A subsidiary goal was to make money in various ways.”

“The first name on the list I was handed was Robert Pool, Jr. A prominent American, Pool was the leading advocate of privatization of the American aviation industry. He was the president of the Reason Foundation, located in Santa Monica, California.”

“Then there was a man called Harry Donald Schultz. He was living in the United States and, from time to time, in Monaco. Schultz’s partner was named Riner Dienharts. The Frenchman said that all these names tied in somehow with a Canadian foundation in Vancouver, British Columbia, called the Phoenix Foundation.”

“Pool was a member, if not a leader, of the Libertarian party.”
—pgs. 243-244

Mossad Conducts Sophisticated Pyschological Warfare Against All Nations, Especially the United States

“Operation Brush-Fire. This was an all-out LAP (LoAhma Psicologit – Israeli psychological warfare) attack aimed at getting the United States involved militarily in the Middle East in general and the Gulf area in particular.”

“The Iran-Iraq war was over. It seemed that the Iranians had had enough and were happy to agree to end the war as the Iraqis wanted. The Mossad, for their part, pretended to the Americans that they wanted to topple Saddam Hussein, while at the same time passing on information to his Muchabarat from the Israeli embassy in Washington, warning him about various attempts on his life an don his regime. The Mossad regarded Saddam Hussein as their biggest asset in the area, since he was totally irrational as far as international politics was concerned, and was therefore all the more likely to make a stupid move that the Mossad could take advantage of.”

“Mossad manipulated it so that Iraq looked as if it were the only country unwilling to talk, thereby convincing the Americans that Iraq had a different agenda.”

“By January 1989, the Mossad LAP machine was busy portraying Saddam as a tyrant and a danger to the world. The Mossad activated every asset it had, in every place possible, from volunteer agents in Amnesty International to fully bought members of the U.S. Congress.”
—pgs. 246-247

Mossad Armed and Supported the Kurds Against Iraq and Saddam

“Saddam had been killing his own people, the cry went; what could his enemies expect? The gruesome photos of dead Kurdish mothers clutching their dead babies after a gas attack by Saddam’s army were real, and the acts were horrendous. But the Kurds were entangled in an all-out guerrilla war with the regime in Baghdad and had been supported for years by the Mossad, who sent arms and advisers to the mountain camps of the Barazany family; this attack by the Iraqis could hardly be called and attack on their own people.”
—pg. 247

Sayan (Secret Civilian Jewish Helpers) Break the Law to Help Mossad Carry Out Assassinations and Operations

“They left the cars in an underground parking lot to be picked up the next day by a car sayan who’d rented the cars to them (Mossad assassins) without registering the rental.”

Canadian Judge Bars Discussion of Ostrovsky’s First Book After Pressure From Israeli Government

“The Canadian judge had barred all discussions of the book for a period of ten days. I knew that this was the interval of time that the Mossad had to try to stop me.
—pg. 264

Zionist Larry King and Guests Call Ostrovsky a Liar – Jonathan Pollard Affair, The Lavon Affair

“Then there was the Larry King Show, by which time the gag order was lifted, where I received somewhat rougher treatment. To build some contentiousness into the hour, the show’s producers had invited Amos Perelmuter, a professor from the American University in Washington, D.C. to join King and me. From the start, it was clear that Perelmuter was an enthusiastic supporter of the state of Israel, and that what he’d heard about my book-he admitted he hadn’t read it-he didn’t like it.

There was never enough time on such shows to put Perelmuter and other “designated champions of Israel” on the spot. How did they know that everything I was saying was lies? I was the one who’d served in the Mossad, not they. Why was it that these loyal Americans were willing to accept any mud thrown at the CIA without even giving it a second though but insisted on defending to the hilt an intelligence agency of a foreign country that had been known to spy on the United States (as in the Pollard case) and hadn’t refrained from attacking American interests (as in the case of the Lavon affair in Egypt, among others)
—pg. 265

Ostrovsky Says Zionism and the State of Israel are a Racist, Prejudiced, and Oppressive Nightmare

“I had already realized for some time that I no longer shared that ideology that for me the state of Israel was no longer the fulfillment of an ancient dream. For me, it was more a nightmare of prejudice, wallowing in racism and waving the white and blue flag as a banner of oppression. I wanted no part of it. What I was doing now was showing the carriers of that banner their vulnerability, so that they would stop and reappraise their own purpose. Maybe then they could join the family of nations on an equal footing.”
—pg. 273

Mossad Planned a False-Flag Assassination of George Bush Using Palestinian Patsies at the Madrid Peace Conference

“There was no doubt that Bush would be out of his element on October 30 when he arrived in Madrid to open the peace talks.”

It was clear from the start that the assassination would be blamed on the Palestinians-perhaps ending once and for all their irritating resistance and making them the people most hated by all Americans.

Three Palestinian extremists were taken by a Kidon unit from their hiding place in Beirut and relocated incommunicado in a special detention location in the Negev desert. The three were Beijdun Salameh, Mohammed Hussein, and Hussein Shahin.

At the same time, various threats, some real and some not, were made against the president. The Mossad clique added its share, in order to more precisely define the threat as if it were coming from a group affiliated with a certain guarantee of getting attention and keeping it. So if something were to happen, the media would be quick to react and say, “We knew about it, and don’t forget where you saw it first.”
—pg. 278-279

Mossad Make Themselves Appear as the Heroes Even When They Are the Villains (Bush Assassination Plot)

“Several days before the event, it was leaked to the Spanish police that the three terrorists were on their way to Madrid and that they were probably planning some extravagant action. Since the Mossad had all the security arrangements in hand, it would not be a problem for this particular clique to bring the “killers” as close as they might want to the president and then stage a killing. In the ensuing confusion, the Mossad people would kill the “perpetrators”, scoring yet another victory for the Mossad. They’d be very sorry that they hadn’t been able to save the president, but protecting him was not their job to begin with. With all the security forces involved and the assassins dead, it would be very difficult to discover where the security breach had been, except that several of the countries in involved in the conference, such as Syria, were regarded as countries that assisted terrorists. With that in mind, it would be a foregone conclusion where the breach was. As far as the Mossad clique was concerned, it was a win-win situation.”
—pg. 279-280

Mossad Used Their Media Control to Discredit Israeli Nuclear Whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu

“But the Mossad had used its ace in the hole one time too many. Asking Maxwell to get involved in a matter of secondary importance (namely, the Vanunu affair) had been a big mistake, for which the media mogul would be made to pay the price.

That involvement caused suspicion in the British Parliament that there was no smoke without fire, particularly after the publication of a book by an American reporter claiming Maxwell was a Mossad agent.”
—pg. 284

Mossad helped stage phoney August Coup against Gorbachev in order to legitimize the so called democratization of the Soviet Union

“It was Maxwell who’d helped created the ties with the now-defunct KGB. The right-wingers realized it would be a devastating blow to Israel’s standing in the West of the world were to learn that the Mossad had participated in an way, as minute as that participation might be, in the attempted coup to stop the democratization of the Soviet Union. It would be perceived as treason against the West.”

A small meeting of right-wingers at Mossad headquarters resulted in a consensus to terminate Maxwell.”

A response to Father Michael Ruskin regarding the Russia deception

Anti-Christian Soviet propaganda. Perhaps this rendering has dual meaning. On one hand, the Soviets portray the church as a religious snare, but on the other hand, perhaps they are crytpically telling Russians of the Soviet control of the Patriarchate of Moscow.

The following is in response to comments made by Father Michael Ruskin of Christ the Saviour Antiochian Orthodox Church of New Zealand to my open letter on the Russia deception.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 5, 2018 Anno Domini

Dear Father Michael,

Your sobering reminder about the daily battle within ourselves is without a doubt the most important battle in our day-to-day lives. The Holy Scriptures warn us that the ultimate struggle is not with flesh and blood but with things of the spirit. How correct this is.

But let us realize that communism and its subsidiaries are not merely physical and political constructs with which to enslave humans beings. They are deeply spiritual—so much so that Patriarch Tikhon died to protect his flock from its spiritual perversion, not just its physical oppressiveness. It is not called “Godless communism” without good reason. In hindsight, Tikhon was justified in moving the Church into the catacombs, as the resulting Marxist churches (permitted by Lenin and the Soviets) that sprang up in both East and West (Vatican II) would evolve and attempt to replace the true one, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Prior to its Marxist infiltration, the Vatican also issued grave warnings about the communist threat. The Eastern and Western Churches were in complete agreement on this. But where are these warnings in the new Sovietized churches? No where. They don’t exist. Communism/Marxism is no longer a threat, they have us believing.

Is Putin doing anything more than Lenin in permitting the existence of the Sergian church in Russia and its subsidiaries in the West? Where is the rebirth of authentic Orthodoxy in Russia today? Shouldn’t this be reflected in Russia’s statistics, which have sky-high abortion rates, broken families, and essentially the same problems as the “evil” West? How many Russians even know of the Catacomb Church? In truth, both Putin and Lenin are responsible for the rebirth of the orthodox church—a Soviet mongrelized church. Patriarch Kirill follows the Sergian line of illegitimate succession, it seems. And lo and behold, Kirill is “former” FSB. During the Red Terror, the Soviets created schisms within the true Church and even honeypot “anti-Soviet” traditional churches to lure the flock to their deaths. How can we be sure Putin will not (perhaps he already has) do the same? Golitsyn claimed in the 1980s-90s that the crypto-Soviet power would offer concessions to the Church—effectively gambits—as part of its long-range strategy to woo social conservatives. And this is exactly what happened. In the following quote, Golitsyn speaks of the subversion of the Church.

“It fails to understand that greater apparent official tolerance of religion in the Soviet Union is accompanied by a secret drive to increase Party and KGB penetration of the Catholic and other churches and to use agents therein for political and strategic purposes inside and outside the Soviet Union. As part of the programme to destroy religion from within, the KGB, in the late 1950s, started sending dedicated young Communists to ecclesiastical academies and seminaries to train them as future church leaders. These young Communists joined the Church, not at the call of their consciences to serve God, but at the call of the Communist Party in order to serve that Party and to implement its general line in the struggle against religion.” (pg. 116, The Perestroika Deception)

Brother Maurice Pinay spoke in the 1960s of the same phenomenon of subversives entering the Catholic priesthood. It seems the same has happened in the Orthodox Church. Both Kirill and the Bishop of Rome, Pope Francis, are ecumenists who espouse communist views. This only corroborates Golitsyn’s warnings.

Golitsyn narrows down Russia’s false democratisation plot and concludes with,

“It is, however, a false, cosmetic liberalisation. For example, the alleged religious relaxation is a spectacle produced and managed by the KGB and the high priests of the church who are KGB agents assigned to fulfill the strategy…In the present phase, secret agents in the Catholic and other churches are being used to implement Communist strategy. When they achieve their Communist world victory, they will use mass withdrawal of their agents to disrupt and destroy the churches. Never in its history since Nero has Christianity faced such a threat of possible destruction. The dictum of the late Pope Pius XII about the incompatibility of Communism and religion is as correct as ever. The Vatican should reaffirm this dictum and should use its influence and its ‘divisions’ to defend Western values from the new Communist assault. (pgs. 189, 116-117)

Keep in mind that Golitsyn said all of this long before Kirill became patriarch. Can you honestly say to yourself that it’s a mere coincidence that the “tobacco” metropolitan happened to be pulled from communist ranks of the KGB?

The idea that the Russian Federation is the last bastion of Christian orthodox theocracy and, therefore, must defend itself is a wonderful one, but it does not stand under scrutiny. Firstly, many proponents of this perceived Russian-theocratic state point to the number of NATO military bases surrounding Russia as an indication that Russia is not an aggressor but is, instead, only acting defensively. But they can’t seem to explain how this supposedly superior Western-led NATO military occupation couldn’t manage to stop Russia from annexing Crimea, much less retaliate. Aside from a few show sanctions imposed by then U.S. President Obama (a secret communist himself) and other Western nations following the annexation, we didn’t so much as see a budge from a single NATO tank in response. Why? The only two conclusions one can come to is that NATO and the West are not militarily superior to Russia and her allies or, worse yet, the two sides are in on the charade together. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty has been invoked only one time, following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks—provoking a Western-led military campaign in which Russia acted quite passively, even endorsing the U.S. narrative of things. Is NATO really anything more than just a show army designed to trick Westerners into thinking the communist threat is being dealt with while the threat actually becomes stronger? I fear this may be the case, especially seeing as the Soviet plan involves dismantling NATO by subversion, not by guns—the same way the Church is being co-opted.

In the spirit of Lenin and his living student Aleksandr Dugin, defenders of Russia point to the infectious moral decay of the West and how this legitimizes Russia’s social and geopolitical manoeuvrings. While this is true about the West’s moral decay, these defenders don’t seem to be asking themselves what the motive is behind these charges. It’s one thing to point out immorality from a Christian perspective but quite another to point it out for strategic reasons. Is Russia portraying the West as evil because it is truly evil or is it doing so to weaken its morale? I can’t count how many Westerners I have seen cheering on Russian (Soviet) penetration of the West thinking it will destroy globalism. How ironic and twisted. These same also fail to acknowledge the large Soviet hand in furthering the moral decay of the West. Soviet penetration of Western governments is one thing, but when you have Soviet penetration of the education system, it becomes all the more obvious how we got to where we are today. The Western counter-culture revolutions of the 1960s were largely hatched in the Soviet Union. Are we supposed to forgive and forget all of this because the media has shouted from every rooftop that communism has fallen? And why should we trust the media, when it is part of the morally decayed West? Think about how we learned of the fake collapse of communism: from Western media. If the “evil” West truly hated “orthodox” Russia, you would think they would have been a little more prudent in assessing the validity of the purported fall of communism. Why was it immediately accepted without any kind of investigation? The crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is playing a classic globalist dialectic of creating the problem: cultural Marxism in the West, and offering the solution: neo-Bolshevik one worldism led by Russia.

Father Ruskin, you claim that the European Union is collapsing of its own volition, but consider that Europe’s largest economy resides in Germany, whose head Angela Merkel happens to be a “former” Soviet. It’s reasonable to say that Germany sets the tone for the EU. All Russia would have to do to manipulate the EU is have at least one rogue EU state under its control; although, I am sure it’s actually more than just one. Germany fits this hypothesis. It could be said that Merkel is the single biggest saboteur of EU migration norms. With Merkel being a communist in the service of the crypto-Soviet Union, it seems that “Russia” is leading the campaign to de-Europeanize Europe. Yet, we are being told the opposite by Western Russophiles. Is it just a coincidence that Dugin’s Eurasian utopia concept is consistent with Kalergi’s Pan-European utopia?

As for Putin’s so called social conservatism, Russia recently has just had its first legal same-sex marriage. Russia’s decades of strategic corruption of Western mores has finally returned to its master. It’s now only a matter of time. And blaming the West will be invalid, as the Soviet Union was pretty much the birthplace of the sexual revolution. In their occultic vision, the serpent’s head has reached its tail.

Your concluding statement, “It’s drawing a long bow to suggest they resurrected the Church to lull us into a false calmness before deceptively overwhelming us,” describes what Golitsyn explains as failed Western analysis of the Soviet threat. And as the above quotes show, this is exactly the kind of sophisticated enemy with which we are dealing. This is not about fearing the Kremlin and its diabolical plans but about discerning it…in righteousness.

Respectfully yours,

Timothy Fitzpatrick

The Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church

To: E. Michael Jones, Professor Kevin MacDonald, Nick Griffin, Jeff Rense, Michael Rivero, James Corbett,  Henry Makow, Jordan Peterson, Patrick Wood, Nathanael Kapner, Mike Herzog, Christopher Bollyn, Michael Voris, David Duke
From: Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)
Subject: Open Letter regarding the Russia deception of Western nationalists and the Church
Date: July 1, 2018 Anno Domini

via email

Dear Brothers:

A small minority of us in the Western nationalist movement feel it imperative to alert leaders and persons of influence in our sphere of the great Russia deception. For it seems the great majority in our movement are being deceived on a massive scale by a decades-old, highly sophisticated, and highly co-ordinated campaign to lure the Church and Western nationalists into a trap in order to finally clinch world communistic government.

Essentially, the deception lies in the mistaken belief in the collapse of communist power in Russia, in the supposed Sino-Soviet split, and in the alleged rebirth of conservatism/nationalism/Christian orthodoxy in the current Russian Federation. Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn attempted to warn the world of this grand Russia deception in the 1980s through his contacts in the Central Intelligence Agency; however, we fear his efforts may have been sabotaged by Zionist agents within the CIA, namely one James Jesus Angleton. As a result, his message appears to have been blocked from reaching the appropriate channels of power in government and, ultimately, omitted from foreign policy plans of Western nations.

Golitsyn laid out in his memoranda to the CIA (made public through his two books: New Lies for Old and The Perestroika Deception) how the long-range Soviet plan—based on Leninist deception methods—was to restructure communism in China and the Soviet bloc to the more aesthetically appealing democratic socialism in order to lull the West to sleep over the world communist threat. Once this step had been accomplished (in the 1990s), the plan was to move on to the next phase, which would involve what Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov described as the demoralization of the Western social sphere, where the crypto-Soviet regime would externalize onto the West a seemingly contradictory policy of promoting opposing extreme Right and Left ideals as well as identity politics—with the hope of disarming, destabilizing, and weakening it. The perceived mystique surrounding this hyper-normalization doctrine has kept the public and Western analysts from detecting the stealth long-range Soviet plan for world government. As we have learned through the latest U.S. presidential election, the Soviets have manipulated the U.S. electoral process, mainly by way of mimetic warfare through the cyber medium, which polarized the electorate using well organized online troll armies. It appears that the crypto-Soviets were not as concerned with the winner of the election as they were with the resulting polarization of the American populace. The alleged Soviet blackmail of Trump just happened to be an bonus and insurance policy on their strategy. At present, Russia appears to be feigning a return to conservatism and Orthodoxy as part of its two-tiered hyper-normalization deception. But make no mistake, it is all a ruse. The crypto-Soviet power is no friend to the Church, to the West, nor to the Russian people.

Not only does Golitsyn have a greater-than-90-per-cent accuracy rate through his hundreds of predictions of Soviet manoeuvres over the last three decades, he has corroboration through the admissions of one of the Soviets’ top modern Marxist prophets: Alexander Dugin. It is clear that Dugin—a self-described nationalist Bolshevist who helped found the Communist Party of the Russian Federation following the staged disintegration of the CPSU—is the rebirth of Karl Marx. His political theories are realizing Lenin’s vision for the final victory of world communism. Through a cleverly veiled dialectic, Dugin and his Duginism have apparently captivated Western nationalists, even Church leaders. They’ve been deceived into thinking Dugin’s Bolshevik concepts are aligned with the goals of Western nationalism and the Church’s social conservatism. Duginism appears to be the fulfillment of another important aspect of the world communist goal in the Warburg’s Kalergi Plan, which involves a push towards transhumanism and the de-Europeanization of the West through unfettered migration of mostly Islamic and Asiatic populations to Europe and its Western daughters in North America and Oceania. Dugin makes it clear in his many political papers that Russia and its KGB-invented Eurasian mandate for the world involves the disintegration of ethno and religious states and the integration of all peoples and faiths—the final realization of Judaeo-masonic world communistic government. Brother Maurice Pinay warned the world of this plan in The Plot Against the Church (1962).

The capstone of this great Russia deception lies in the Judaized global technocracy agenda, which is central to the planned communistic world government. We have learned that the existing Sino-Soviet axis is now fully dedicated to the development and integration of Israeli high technology (Talpiot program, 8200). This collectivist technocracy—as outlined in such schemes as the United Nations’ Agenda 21—will be mandatory for all citizens of the planned world government. The Soviets have the demoralized West occupied with identity politics and Balkanization schemes, like Kalergi, while Israel, Russia, China, and the BRICS solidify their alliance through the One Belt, One Road plan and construct the coming world government techno-infrastructure smart grid. It appears Russia is leading the disintegration of the West while Israel leads the technology aspect, and China the manufacturing aspect. Furthermore, Israel appears poised to replace its military sponsor in the United States with the militaries of both Russia and China. As we recently have seen, Russia is policing the Middle East on behalf of Israel with greater intensity. Golitsyn warned that this Judaeo-Sino-Soviet axis would use co-operation blackmail to get Western complicity. This can only mean that the axis is militarily superior to the West and NATO!

To address the causes of this deception proves difficult. One possible primary cause, and something which Golitsyn notes, is the repeated use of failed Western analysis of the highly complex Soviet strategy. Soviet defectors have told the West that Soviet propaganda relies to a great degree on the concept of controlled opposition, as was demonstrated with the Soviet Trust honeypot model under Lenin, and on the use of double agents. It seems that Western nationalists and Church leaders have failed to recognize the repeated use of these sophisticated tactics, save for some traditional Catholic opponents to the communist-inspired modernization of the Vatican and some faithful Eastern Orthodox, like in ROCOR and the Catacomb Church, who learned of Soviet manipulation and control of Church leadership (still going on). It is possible that our Catholic brothers may be further deceived by the great Russia deception due to their reliance on the Fatima prophecies, which predict a reconciliation of Russia with the Roman Catholic Church.

We implore you to rethink your position regarding Russia and its role in the reshaping of the world as we know it. If Golitsyn proves to be correct yet again, Western failure to detect and act upon this great Russian deception inevitably will result in its own demise, along with the Church as we know it. Embracing your future captors is not a good idea.

Sincerely,

Timothy Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick Informer)

Kalergi plan archive

The Kalergi plan explained

Europe’s “refugee” crisis and the Kalergi plan for white genocide

Former Shin Bet Chief warned in 2014 that Israel would Islamify Europe if it didn’t protect Jews (it was inevitable no matter what Europe did)

Dugin in 1997: Unleash “Afro-American Racists” on White America

Holocaust Propaganda Aligns Jews and Muslims Against Europeans

The Jewish Origins of Islam

Jews abandon ‘Islamophobia’, embrace Islam as proxy against Christ, again

Series:

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan: White Genocide by Design (Part 1)

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan: White Genocide by Design (Part 2)

Kalergi’s Jewish Plan for European Genocide

The EU/UN Plan – The Genocide Of The Caucasian People Of Europe and Agenda 21

Muslims are Jews’ natural allies in Europe – Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt

United Nations Migration Chief Claims Mass Migration in ‘National Interest’

VIDEO: European/Zionist Plot to Eradicate Race Through Immigration (Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan)

Is the ‘Migrant Crisis’ Part of a Zionist Plot Against White Europeans?

Crypto-Soviet Eurasianist Dugin: “White Racism is Disgusting” + Pro-Cannibalism

Jews over-represented on immigration policy boards of Western nations

‘Islamization of Europe a good thing’, says Israeli rabbi

The Irish military ship ‘Samuel Beckett’ has brought more than 100 illegal invasive African migrants to Messina Sicily

The Barcelona Declaration: the fate of Europe was decided long ago

Islamization of Europe – What you didn’t know

Catholic Bishop- Europe Migrant Crisis ‘Orchestrated’ by International Powers

Fox News edits Trump rally protestor holding up giant photo of Trump with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein

Portrait of American financier Jeffrey Epstein (left) and real estate developer Donald Trump as they pose together at the Mar-a-Lago estate, Palm Beach, Florida, 1997.
Davidoff Studios Photography/GettyImages

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 20, 2018 Anno Domini

Fox News edited out an embarrassing incident at a Trump rally in Minnesota today where a protestor interrupted the President and held up a giant photo of Trump with his arm around convicted pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

“Who is Jeffrey Epstein?” a caption on the photo asked.

Some alert viewers posted the unedited footage of the incident to Youtube, trumping Fox, which later edited out the incident and showed only a shot of Trump’s face as the protestor was escorted out by security from the Amsoil Arena in Duluth. The rally was in support of the GOP in anticipation of the 2018 Midterm elections.

Trump promptly responded by demanding security remove the man followed by Trump belittling and ridiculing the protestor with statements like, “Go home to your Mom, darling” and “was that a man or a woman, because he needs a haircut more than I do?”

Here is the footage from the live feed before the Fox News edit (the second clip, although captured from a TV, shows the photo more clearly; the third video shows an on-the-ground point of view of the protestor):

And now here is Fox’s sanitized version:

For more on the relationship between Trump and Epstein, please read the following series:

Trump controlled by MossadPart I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V

How the vaccine conspiracy benefits the banksters

This is a very good information graphic, but it lacks the key ingredient of the Rothschild banking crime syndicate. (Click graphic to enhance)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 8, 2018 Anno Domini

Yes, vaccines can and do cause serious injury to humans; this is a well-documented fact. It is also well documented that the massive worldwide pharmaceutical industry that manufactures and disburses these vaccines has gone to great lengths to cover-up this fact.

But a little known, equally important fact is that the big banks of this world are raking in as much money, if not more than, Big Pharma—all at the expense of the uninformed and unsuspecting Western populace.

Many Western governments have developed funds to compensate victims of vaccination injury—that’s if said victims are fortunate enough to figure out that vaccines have damaged them. How many health problems caused by vaccines are misattributed to something else? Likely very many. But even when these fortunate few do bring their claims to government’s vaccine court in need of compensation, many, if not most, of these claims are denied—usually on the grounds of insufficient “scientific” evidence. What average middle class family can afford to hire a lawyer, doctors, and clinicians to provide this evidence? Few, if any. So it seems that these government compensation funds are really just for show, and the criminal pharmaceutical vaccine racket can march ahead unfettered.

The Rothchild banking crime syndicate, which controls almost all world banks, benefits from this public health crisis through at least two means. Western taxpayers are burdened with both providing the funds for the government-sponsored vaccine injury compensation funds (vaccines makers are typically exempt from vaccine injury liability) and for feeding the ever-dwindling coffers for socialized medicine, which are projected to be sucked dry by the enormous public health crisis of vaccine-induced autism. Forget all the other health crises plaguing the West (by design and also to the benefit of the banksters), this one crisis, alone, will bankrupt Western public healthcare systems if it is not mitigated—and soon.

So where does that leave Western governments? It leaves them begging at the doorstep of the Rothschilds to borrow their paper fiat at usurious rates. How else will Western governments prop up their sick and decaying societies when the money dries up? Brain-dead Western leaders can’t figure out the scam; those with brains are just in on the fix for their own benefit. Our elected officials have allowed Big Pharma and the Rothschilds to run their self-perpetuating vaccine scam, which has resulted in nothing but misery, suffering, and poverty.

Another probable outcome of the Rothschild vaccine scam is that it will force Western governments to increase taxes to prop up their healthcare systems. This will result in the continued eradication of the Middle Class, greater financial strain on the Lower Class, and less informed consent when it comes to public health programs like vaccination. Think about how much more difficult it will be for a family with less expendable income to learn about the dangers of vaccines. Education is generally reciprocal to income. The only way to solve this dilemma is for families to borrow money for education. That’s assuming they will be even credit worthy. Again, the banskters win.

How much more institutionalized will this heist be if and when vaccination is globally mandatory? God forbid it should happen.

Trump controlled by Mossad – Part V

Trump at event with broadcaster Mike Wallace (second from right) and Mossad super spy Robert Maxwell (right). One of my readers believes the man in the middle is future Trump administration Attorney General Jeff Sessions, but I am not sure.

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 3, 2018 Anno Domini

Why and for whom had convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged procurer girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell bugged the sexual encounters between his elite friends and children and prostitutes? Was it merely for billionaire Epstein’s own gain or was it for someone else? Was Epstein the ringleader? Or was it actually his girlfriend?

It seems unlikely that the already-rich Epstein did it for his own blackmail purposes. It’s difficult to find a clear motive. Epstein doesn’t seem like a politically ambitious character. Instead, he seems content with his billions and sexual license. What seems more likely is that Epstein and Maxwell were doing it for a third party. Let’s continue to speculate, as we have for the breadth of this series, that that third party is Israel’s bloody spy agency Mossad and about what they stood to gain from Epstein’s sexual blackmail of prominent people, especially U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump rides Lady Ghislaine in Mossad super cell

Maxwell and the Lady Ghislaine.

Donald Trump revealed in 2002 that he had been friends with Jeffrey Epstein for 15 years. That would put the start of their friendship around 1987; although, it’s possible their friendship began earlier. The late disgraced Mossad superspy and media mogul Robert Maxwell (Jewish name: Abraham Leib Hoch, of a Chassidic Jewish Czech family), the father of Epstein’s alleged child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, held a party on his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine (named after his favourite daughter), sometime in the spring of 1989. Guess who was at that party? Donald Trump. Also on board, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch[1], were Ghislaine Maxwell, former U.S. senator John Tower (of Iran-Contra scandal infamy), and other prominents, like ex-navy secretary John Lehman. Whether Epstein was at that party is anyone’s guess, but it’s certainly plausible, as Robert Maxwell had extensive dealings with bankers and financiers, including the Rothschilds, his “trusted friends” Goldman Sachs, and Lehman brothers. You’ll remember from the first part of this series that Trump’s yacht, Trump Princess, was purchased from Mossad asset and major Iran-Contra player Adnan Khashoggi. Maxwell’s £12-million yacht, Lady Ghislaine, was purchased from one of Khashoggi’s brothers. As we will see, Maxwell himself was a significant player in the Iran-Contra affair on behalf of Israel’s Mossad and, to some extent, the Soviet Union.

Ghislaine Maxwell (right) with Abigail Klem, chief brand officer of Ivanka Trump’s clothes and accessories line, at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party at The Core Club in New York City, February 14, 2007.

So now we have established not only a long-standing relationship between Trump and Epstein but also between Trump and two Maxwells—Robert and his daughter Ghislaine. Trump’s late father Fred personally may have known Robert Maxwell as well, as Fred was involved in major real estate projects that would have interested characters like Maxwell and his money-laundering thug pals in the Soviet Union, who laundered much of their dirty money through New York and Florida—two places in which Donald Trump has primary residences. Donald Trump and Ghislaine could be friends, business partners, acquaintances, or perhaps something more. The trio (including Epstein) has been spotted together on multiple occasions, including when golf magazine writer Michael Corcoran sat with Trump, Ghislaine, and Epstein on Trump’s private plane in order to conduct an interview.[2] In 2007, Ghislaine Maxwell was photographed with Ivanka Trump’s future brand officer of her clothing company at the Felix Rey Valentine’s Day party in New York City in 2007. Trump and Ghislaine may have been intimately involved with each other. Whatever the case, on board Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989, Trump was in the hands of a Mossad super cell.

Trump, Melania, Jeffrey Epstein, and GhislaineMaxwell at Trump’s Florida residence Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, February 12, 2000. Epstein’s residence is blocks away.

Robert Maxwell: Soviet-friendly Mossad superspy

In that same year Trump was riding the Lady Ghislaine, Robert Maxwell was extremely busy scheming and scamming his way to riches and power, simultaneously working for himself as publisher of his British media empire, Mossad, the Soviets, and organized crime—all of which benefited each other in multiple ways. Maxwell biographers Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon write, “Maxwell used the power of all his newspapers to attack Israel’s enemies” and that he had “acquired a rare and privileged position in the communist world.”[3] When Maxwell wasn’t making hundreds of millions hocking Mossad’s pirated and bugged version of Bill Hamilton’s PROMIS software to intelligence agencies, governments, and criminals around the world—even penetrating the Unites States’ most secure nuclear installation, Sandia National Laboratories—Maxwell was helping Jewish-Soviet mob bosses like Simeon Mogilevich launder money through various world banks and through Maxwell’s complex web of dummy corporations (in the fourth part of this series, we learned of Trump’s role in helping the Mogilevich syndicate launder money through his real estate ventures. Mogilevich also got his hands on a copy of PROMIS, which was allegedly sold to Osama Bin Laden, among others) and brokering deals with likes of Soviet presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and Leonid Brezhnev (purported to be close friends with Maxwell), as well as KGB boss Vladimir Kryuchkov (the main player in the staged “August Coup” against Gorbachev and Perestroika). Maxwell helped Mogilevich obtain an Israeli passport through the Mossad.[4] Perhaps it was Maxwell who first introduced Trump to Mogilevich and other Jewish oligarchs and crime figures. Perhaps they even met on the Lady Ghislaine that day in 1989. Perhaps this is when the Soviets, through mobsters like Mogilevich, first recognized the potential to blackmail and groom Trump as an agent of influence. Former FBI director John O’Neil—who died his first day on the job; September 11, 2001; as head of security at Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center—told journalists that Maxwell’s complex money laundering schemes became the model for Soviet and other organized crime syndicates.[5] Evidently, Trump would go on to walk in Maxwell’s footsteps, providing channels for Soviet oligarch loot—stolen from the mostly peasant millions upon millions of victims of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe.

Was Epstein blackmailing for Mossad through the Maxwells?

Seymour Hersh

To bring plausibility to the theory that Epstein and/or Ghislaine were running the child-sex blackmail ring on behalf of the Mossad, we have to establish a clear link to the Mossad. One is Robert Maxwell, via his daughter Ghislaine. The weight of evidence suggests that in 1991, the Mossad, itself, murdered Robert Maxwell after he allegedly tried to blackmail them into paying off his massive debts and because of the implications of the revelations in The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy by journalist Seymour Hersh that same year that Maxwell had been a secret spy for the Mossad—something that was not publicly known up until that point. Maxwell was apparently assassinated shortly after the publication of Hersh’s book, after British Labour MPs George Galloway and Rupert Allason quoted before the House of Commons a portion of Hersh’s book as it pertained to Maxwell and demanded an investigation into Maxwell and his Mossad ties.[6] The Hersh citations, then free to be reported on by the press under parliamentary privilege, found their way into the British media, and Mossad’s charade began to unravel. Hersh also revealed that one of Maxwell’s Mirror editors, Nick Davies, had helped Maxwell and the Mossad betray former Israeli nuclear technician whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu. Mossad defector Ari Ben-Menashe claimed that in 1986 Robert Maxwell alerted the Israeli embassy (Mossad) that Vanunu had given The Sunday Times a story exposing Israel’s nuclear development at Dimona.[7] Vanunu mistakenly thought that he was giving an independent news outlet the story of the decade. Instead, what he got was a Mossad honey trap, which resulted in the Mossad kidnapping Vanunu after being lured to Italy by a woman of the Mossad. Vanunu was then incarcerated for 18 years in Israel. These revelations, along with Maxwell’s mountainous debt, his ever rising complications with money laundering in the Soviet Block, and his supposed blackmail of the Mossad, appear to have led to his assassination on the Lady Ghislaine 5 November 1991, just weeks after the Hersh bombshell.

Then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir with Robert Maxwell in 1991. Shamir also ran assassinations for Mossad from 1955-1965 and is believed to have been involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Apparently, the Mossad had had enough of a man Likudnik Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir once described as having done more for Israel than any other man on the planet. But remember, there is no honour among thieves. Many high-level operatives were murdered in the aftermath of the Iran-Contra affair—the affair itself being used expressly to help Israel arm Iran and Iraq as part of a Balkanization scheme, which became known as the Yinon Plan.[8] Israel also used the scandal to install Ronald Reagan as president—clearly the preferred choice of the Likud-Chabad syndicate. Donald Trump would go on to become Reagan 2.0 in 2016. Maxwell directly aided the Yinon Plan-Iran-Contra scandal by helping to arm Iran with weapons from Poland. Kryuchkov was fully aware of Israel’s interests in arming its enemies and played right along (Mossad-KGB collaboration). “So the Iranians get to kill more Iraqis. Then, when Teheran is on top, Israel starts to supply Baghdad so as to kill more Iranians.”[9]

Ghislaine Maxwell went on the record stating that her father was murdered, despite the botched investigation that tended towards either a suicide or accident conclusion. Ghislaine didn’t hint at who might have carried out the hit. Would she go on, only a few years later, to help Mossad set up Operation Jeffrey Epstein knowing that the very people she was working for might have killed her dad? Or did her father receiving a state funeral in Jerusalem—attended by the Israeli government’s top brass—fool her into thinking that Mossad was innocent of her father’s death? More interestingly, yet, perhaps she never volunteered to aid the operation in the first place but was approached by the Mossad and obliged out of fear that she might meet a similar fate as her father. She could have detached herself from the past in order to gain what Mossad could have offered her. She was reportedly the most practical in her behavior after learning of her father’s death. It seems she is not a woman ruled by her emotions.

More Epstein-Maxwell-Mossad connections

Ehud Barak

Another Mossad connection between Maxwell and Epstein is Ehud Barak, former Israeli Prime Minister. While working for Mossad and helping Soviet Jews immigrate to Israel, Robert Maxwell would meet with Barak, who was then director of Aman, Israel’s military intelligence.[10] After authorities sentenced Epstein for child prostitution in 2008, they discovered a black contact book containing names of many prominent people, some of whom Epstein is believed to have blackmailed. As well, it contained contact information for some of the child victims. Barak’s name is in there…and it is was circled by Epstein’s former housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez (since died mysteriously) as being one of many to either witness or participate in Epstein’s abuse of young girls. Also circled were the names of Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Alan Dershowitz, among others. Henry Kissinger—close friend to Robert Maxwell—was also listed in Epstein’s book.

Another (potential) Mossad connection with Epstein—also with Robert Maxwell—is late Jewish billionaire bankster Edmund Safra. In a long list of Iran-Contra-Oded-Yinon players, Safra also appears to have been assassinated, in 1999. Safra’s name and contact information were found in Epstein’s black book. Safra was the owner of National Republic Bank of New York and helped Robert Maxwell launder money from the Soviet Bloc.[11]

Maxwell’s involvement in the Soviet Perestroika deception

KGB head Vladimir Kryuchkov.

In addition to Seymour Hersh’s exposure of Robert Maxwell as a secret Mossad spy, Israel may have also feared what Maxwell might reveal about Zionist-Soviet collaboration as well as the Perestroika (restructuring of Russian communism for public consumption) deception, of which Maxwell would certainly have had knowledge, being a close friend with Kryuchkov—one of the fake plotters used to legitimize Perestroika and Glasnost as authentic. Kryuchkov helped Maxwell set up 600 companies through which to move dirty money around the globe; some of that money was made from the theft of U.S. technology. The Soviet defector who exposed the perestroika plot, Anatoliy Golitsyn, says this about Kryuchkov:

“As a leading KGB official, he supervised the experiments with ‘democratisation’ in Czechoslovakia and Poland. His KGB advisers worked closely with the Czechoslovak and Polish security services. As deputy head of the KGB since 1978, Kryuchkov has been intimately engaged in the preparation of ‘perestroika’.”[12]

Before Maxwell became a media baron, he served both in British intelligence and in British Parliament as a Labour MP. Ideologically, he appears to have been the quintessential socialist Jew, except when it came to his own capitalist businesses. Maxwell even smoked specially rolled Cuban cigars on the order of Fidel Castro himself.[13] So it was that Maxwell would go on to collaborate with the Communists in the Soviet Union to help Jews colonize Israel and to help the communists rob blind the proletariat. The Soviets began to issue visas to its Jews planning to immigrate to Israel following Maxwell’s visits to and collaboration with the Soviet Union.[14] The astute reader will remember that the Soviet Union, next only to the United States, was the first to recognize the illegal state of Israel in 1948. I won’t get into it here, but it’s well-established that communism and socialism are constructs designed to advance exclusively Jewish interests. Maxwell, and almost certainly Mossad, could have been part of the Soviet development of the Perestroika deception (the fake collapse of communism designed to bring down the guard of the West). The Mossad’s motto, after all, is By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War. Could Maxwell’s alleged blackmail of Mossad have involved disclosure of Israel’s collaboration with the Soviets and their perestroika fraud? It seems that such a revelation would have been more detrimental to Israel’s long-range global plan—especially in light of their immense alliance with Russia today—than anything Mossad defectors Victor Ostrovsky or Ari Ben-Menashe revealed as motives—not to say that what they revealed wasn’t significant. It certainly was.

Maxwell with Soviet leader Leonid Brehznev (middle) in 1978.

Golitsyn summarizes the role of agents of influence like the late Robert Maxwell and U.S. President Donald Trump working in tandem with Soviet Perestroika initiatives:

“These KGB assets will be used to generate Western support for ‘perestroika’ in the USSR and Eastern Europe and also to prepare a favourable climate for ‘restructuring’ in, and convergence with, the United States, Europe and the Third World…. The ultimate objective is Lenin’s replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘New World Social Order’ – World [Communist] Government…. What the West fails to appreciate is that the motive for doing so and for introducing controlled ‘democracy’ is to stimulate changes in the Western system and to facilitate the convergence of the two systems with a view to the eventual absorption of the Western democracies within a World Government.”[15]

Israel’s use for Perestroika is part of its world governance strategy, which involves the leadership of the rising Eurasian power, or BRICS hierarchy, with the self-proclaimed “chosen people” ruling it all. The Jews call it “olam ha ba”, the world to come—their messianic kingdom on earth with gentiles as their footstool.

No doubt, Maxwell used his vast influence through his media empire not only to portray Israel as the good guy but also to perpetuate the legitimacy of Gorbachev’s perestroika deception. The media, after all, were the Western’ world’s only disseminators of what went on in the Soviet Union. Thomas and Dillon reveal Kryuchkov as saying, “’Comrade Maxwell is going to be a good friend of this country.’ And Maxwell replied that he would be glad to tell the world how much the Soviet Union was changing.”[16] Maxwell would go on to purchase the English-speaking Soviet paper The Moscow News. “The newspaper had been Maxwell’s attempt to embrace the liberating policies of Mikhail Gorbachev. Both saw the newspaper as a means to promote perestroika.”[17]

JULY 1, 1987 – Donald Trump and Ivana visit Palace Square in St. Petersburg, USSR. This is the same year year Trump and Jeffrey Epstein became friends. The Steele dossier alleges that St. Petersburg was another city in which Trump was sexually compromised by Russian kompromat agents. (Photo by Maxim Blokhin / TASS via Getty Images)

Did Maxwell pass on sexual blackmail of Trump to the Soviets?

If Robert Maxwell, or even his daughter Ghislaine, had blackmail material on Donald Trump, either from Jeffrey Epstein’s various Kompromat Klubs or other sources, what are the chances that it was passed on not only to Mossad but also to the Soviets? Perhaps the Mossad originally contracted it out to the Soviets and Maxwell joined the fray later, or Soviet blackmail of Trump may have been a back up to Mossad’s. We may never know. But the highly controversial Christopher Steele dossier tends to corroborate this theory as well as Golitsyn’s perestroika deception hypothesis—something both the Left- and Right-wing media completely ignore. Unforuntately, those on the Right have been kept from reading the dossier by way of deception. They have been told that it was invented by the Democrat Party, which it doesn’t appear to be. The dossier appears to be authentic and is a must read for truth seekers. The Steele dossier discusses Trump’s sexual compromise as taking place in Russia (i.e. “PissGate”), which isn’t hard to believe. It doesn’t say exactly how far back the kompromat of Trump extended, but it’s likely to have gone back many years, as Trump has been involved with the Russians for a long time.

Maxwell’s protege Epstein

Like Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Maxwell was considered a “sexual predator” by at least one lover of his.[18] Also like Ghislaine and Epstein, he was no stranger to bugging. Maxwell had bugged his own offices—even restrooms—at the Daily Mirror in order to snoop on his employees. It seems that Ghislaine sees in Epstein the image of her father. Is this the reason she aids and abets his criminal activities, or is it because as the ringleader, she needs him. Perhaps it’s a little bit of both.

Maxwell a Chabadnik?

In the previous installment of this series, we learned how Soviet power changed only in name—from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to an organized crime syndicate controlled by the Chassidic Jewish Chabad Lubavitch, with which Donald Trump is deeply entagled. Although Maxwell’s upbringing was in a Chassidic Jewish household, there isn’t a lot of evidence linking Maxwell to the Chabadniks. In 2015, Chabad Headquarters published an article linking Maxwell with Chabadnik rabbi Yitzchak (Izzy) Kogan.

“Emotionally difficult though it was, Izzy nevertheless returned to Russia and put his street-smarts to work, negotiating with diplomats and private philanthropists to facilitate the dramatic air-lift of 226 children from the Chernobyl area to Israel. He reached out to Robert Maxwell and Armand Hammer who sent their own aircraft to evacuate the children since Russia refused to provide its own carrier. After several tense days during which the children were kept waiting in the Minsk airport with 400 frustrated parents, they finally arrived in Israel to great fanfare.”[19]

Notes:

[1] On Their Toes, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 17, 1989, pg. 7W.

[2] Graham, Regina F., Donald Trump ‘singled out a ‘young socialite’ at his Mar-a-Lago club and told reporter ‘there is nothing in the world like first-rate p**sy” in interview with defunct golf magazine years before infamous Access Hollywood tape, The Daily Mail, November 29, 2017 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5131173/Trump-comment-p-sy-years-tape.html

[3] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, pages 125 & 39

[4] ibid, pg. 173

[5] ibid, pg. 368

[6] Mystery surrounds tabloid tycoon’s death Maxwell Communication Corporation, Altoona Mirror, Nov. 6, 1991, pg. B8

[7] Verkaik, Robert, The Mystery of Maxwell’s death, The Independent, March 10, 2006 – http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=https%3a%2f%2fwww.independent.co.uk%2fnews%2fuk%2fcrime%2fthe-mystery-of-maxwells-death-469294.html&d=4972289678183054&mkt=en-CA&setlang=en-US&w=-Z2STye4d0XVIvJhZQCaX8JYNB2WNIwM

[8] Yinon, Oded, A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties, translated by Israel Shahak, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.; Belmond, Massachusetts, 1982 – http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33220.htm

[9] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 111

[10] ibid, pg. 112

[11] ibid, pg. 228

[12] Golitsyn, Anatoliy, The Perestroika Deception: The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution, 1995, page 22

[13] Thomas, Gordon; Dillon, Martin, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul, Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York, 2002, page 32

[14] ibid, page 43

[15] ibid, pgs. 43, 66, and 128

[16] ibid, pg. 43

[17] ibid, pg. 167

[18] ibid, pg. 28

[19] Olidort, Baila, PROFILE IN COURAGE: The Tzadik of Leningrad, Chabad Lubavitch Headquarters News, November 2, 2015 – http://lubavitch.com/news/article/2056177/PROFILE-IN-COURAGE-The-Tzadik-of-Leningrad.html