The Left has completely hijacked logical fallacy inquiry

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 21, 2019

Research logical fallacies and you will find a plethora of lists and descriptions that all seem to share a similar narrative.

You will find long and short lists of common and uncommon fallacies (illogical arguments) as well as examples of contemporary and past uses of these fallacies. But whether it’s from academia, its closely allied skeptics movement, or from people calling themselves “rational”, the lists and examples tend to share the same narrative.: Right wingers, the religious, and traditionalists—or anyone who Leftists hate—are all illogical, bigoted idiots who should be ignored.

This problem wouldn’t be so bad if one could find a genuinely ideologically neutral source, but it seems next to impossible. Whether the search engines have been manipulated to produce these results and/or non-Leftists are simply not talking about logical fallacies is anyone’s guess. It seems to be a combination of the two. What one could find through search engines 10-20 years ago was a lot more than one finds today. Non-leftists are typically very logical thinking people, but they don’t seem to be engaged in this kind of debate or they may not be aware that their logical thinking has been systematized and put down on paper (as would be the case with the logically thinking but formally uneducated).

Had the Right been more aware, they would have seen that today’s definitions and examples used for the ancient school of logic has been re-organized by the world scientific dictatorship with its Leftist bias. They would have seen and laughed at the Left presenting itself as the sole arbiter of “logic” and morally justified opponents of logically fallacious idiot right wingers.

In reality, the opposite seems true. Academicians and their bedfellow skeptics movement Marxists are themselves guilty of consistently employing logical fallacies. Their worldview is largely based in anti-logic (anti-Logos); their use for logical fallacy inquiry, then, is really only to keep young rank-and-file Lefties from discovering true logic (through distortion of the definitions), as well as to keep the Right from figuring out their deceptive games (prevent the Right from learning about the trappings of logical fallacies). Therefore, by monopolizing this form of inquiry, they can further gatekeep for the Left, thereby maintaing their academic and societal supremacy. They get to control almost all public discourse. Double agent Jordan Peterson recently cemented this absolute public dominance when he declared that European ethno-nationalists ought to be excluded from any discussions.

Forget about historical inquiry about the alleged happenings during the “Holocaust”, because that would be Holocaust denial (appeal to ridicule, appeal to pity, ad hominem, no discussion, narrative fallacy, non-recognition, playing on emotion, reductio ad Hitlerum). Forget about challenging academia and the media’s eschatological fallacies regarding the doomed environment and climate change, for that would be climate denial (appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion, reductionism, Big Lie technique). Don’t ever criticize Israel or Jewish behaviour, for that would be a classic case of vicious anti-Semitism (name calling, appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion). While you’re at it, don’t talk about the freemasons, dangers of vaccines, or world government, because that would just mean that you are one of those conspiracy theorists (name calling, appeal to ridicule, ad hominem, no discussion).

As you can see from these brief examples, nobody is more guilty than the Left is of employing deceptive, fallacious arguments, especially the so called skeptics movement (they are some of the biggest hypocrites in this respect). Yet the media and academia portray the opposite (gaslighting!). With the Left’s “Holocaust denier” fallacy alone, I found at least eight appropriate categories involved in the Left’s dismissal of Holocaust inquiry. Check them out, but just beware of the source and the wording of the carefully crafted descriptions. 

One of the most common fallacies of the Leftist Logical Fallacy Police (LLFPD) is to misrepresent arguments from those on the Right (strawman fallacy). They also frequently use the “fallacy fallacy”, which is when it is assumed that just because someone presents a fallacious argument, their entire position is automatically wrong, when it could simply be that they just haven’t adequately argued their position. This happens with the Right because the Left is typically more formally educated. A Leftist can academically dismiss a fallacious argument presented by a Right winger and resort to a state of cognitive dissonance (thereby re-affirming his Leftist worldview), even though the Right winger’s position is actually true. This is unfortunate.

The LLFPD favours Jews in that they dismiss any and all criticism of Jews as a collective group under the guise of the scapegoating fallacy. While this is a real and legitimate fallacy, it’s most often falsely attributed to critics of Jews. Sure, some people who know nothing about the Jewish question will callously blame Jews for things. But authentic critics will provide solid arguments that demonstrate the cause and effects of collective Jewish behaviour.

Eventually, knowledge of logical fallacies—and logic in general—will become so distorted that it will be meaningless. You can already see this trajectory with the way the Left has reclassified and reworded the definitions and examples. Orwell’s post-truth 1984 seems all the more likely.

Galileo Gambits: Trump, Putin, & Pizzagate

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 1, 2019

The most common defense of Donald Trump as an anti-globalist, conservative swamp drainer is that he must be authentic because of how much the media and the establishment are perceived as hating and vilifying him.

Not only is this defense false, given the overwhelming weight of evidence to the contrary, it’s a fallacious argument to start with.

It’s called the “Galileo Gambit” fallacy.

“The Galileo gambit (also Galileo fallacy) is a logical fallacy that asserts that if your ideas provoke the establishment to vilify or threaten you, you must be right. Users of the fallacy are to be understood as being essentially ‘Galileo wannabes’.”

Trump’s Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevist handlers know this fallacy well and have used it in building up the Cult of Trump—enough that it won him the title of President of the United States. It was none other than a globalist who first put out the lie that Trump was an “outsider” who “couldn’t be bought”. One Newt Gingrich, as if you couldn’t find a swampier spokesman to shill for you. After Gingrich’s opener for Chump, the Cult of Trump base simply expanded on and amplified the fallacious meme, turning Trump into one of the most successful psyops ever foisted on the American people. The more the media attacked Trump in the lead up to the U.S. presidential election, the more convinced his base became of his legitimacy, regardless of the facts.

“This logic is obviously flawed. For example, consider a horribly-oppressed ideology: Wahhabism. Western governments seek to persecute and censor Wahhabists at every opportunity. Does this mean that Wahhabism is correct?”

The Trump defense also falls under the associated fallacy known as Argumentum ad martyrdom—the notion that something becomes true if the person asserting it is perceived to be hated for it and/or that perceived martyrdom is proof that the martyr was correct. 

The Trump psyop also entails a bit of the hostile media effect.

Clearly, all the negative publicity helped Trump more than it hindered him during the election, whether the media knew it or not (I am convinced they were in on the charade). The negative publicity still helps Trump today, simultaneously keeping people tuned into the mind-controlling round-the-clock news in both the mainstream and in the alternative spheres.

This Galileo defense is more commonly used when fellow conservatives are challenging Trump supporters as to their blind allegiance to Chump’s cult of personality. The Chump base has other bags of tricks for Leftist critiquing of their supreme leader, namely dirty tricks like “Pizzagate”. Incidentally, the KGB-Team Trump co-ordination of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory was also validated by his base because of belief in the Galileo gambit fallacy. When some online outlets began censoring the obviously defamatory elements of “Pizzagate”, Trump’s base took it as proof that there was truth to it—all of it, no matter how ridiculous it was.

Trump supporters seem to revert to a state of cognitive dissonance when confronted with the irrationality of their Galileo gambitting. They attack their opponents and run and hide to their echo chambers, which are lovingly padded by double-agent “alternative” media charlatans like Infowars and Zerohedge. It’s no wonder they don’t learn. Their delusions are only fed by the gatekeeper alternative media. Alex Jones’ hypnotic and repetitious meme of “When you’re over the target, you take the most flak” is an explicit example of the Galileo gambit at work. He is another beneficiary of this fallacy and is also heavily involved with the promotion of both Putin and Trump.

These same Trumpists use the exact same fallacy when appraising Russian President Vladimir Putin and the actions of the Kremlin. If the Leftist Western media hates him so much, they argue, he must be the real deal. If the media blames Russia for colluding to hack the election, it must mean that Russia didn’t. Furthermore, it must mean that Russia is the good guy, and an anti-globalist to boot, the rhetoric goes (see this article arguing that the Left’s critique of Russia actually helps Russia). In effect, this dupes are leading the media dictate their analysis of world events, albeit a reactionary response. They don’t seem to grasp that there are constant dialectics at work in media narratives. The social engineers know that the media can control people not only by going along with media narratives but also by contrary reactions to media narratives. This is exactly what has happened with Trump and Putin.

The Putin-Chump cucks live in a make-believe world. Anything the two globalist stooges do is insulated against any valid arguments simply because the Galileo gambit has their base completely deceived and hardwired in to a pre-fabricated narrative. We live in a post-truth era where reason and logic are ignored and lies and memes are king.

Fatima and the Soviet merger of Orthodoxy with Catholicism

ROC “Patriarch” Kirill and “Pope” Francis. Heretics embrace.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 22, 2019 Anno Domini

There are major theological and geopolitical inconsistencies presented by the alleged prophetic Marian apparition at Fatima in the early 20th century.

The much-touted apparition, which seems to be accepted as authentic by the Vatican and is highly touted in the traditional Catholic movement, tends towards not only private interpretation but also millenarianism (an earthly kingdom)—both of which are anathema to both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Before I go on, let me first point out that I am a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy, so I have no dog in this fight when I say that the Fatima prophecies are actually anti-Catholic. Furthermore, my eschatological position is that of the majority of the Church Fathers, which is a post- or amillennial view based in some type of Preterism, perhaps partial Preterism. This is important to note, because the Fatima prophecies tend towards a futurist and even pre-millennial view—inconsistent with the majority view of the Fathers. In fact, Fatima’s eschatology is more consistent with Protestantism and millennarianist philo-Semitism, perhaps similar to that of the Puritans and Hussites, for example. Millenarianism is a sort of Earthly messianic expectation in the spirit of racially supremacist Jews.

The timing of Fatima is very suspicious—the same year of Lenin’s anti-Christ October Revolution in Russia (1917) and Europe. But more on that later.

Russia’s false conversion, false consecration

The major red flag with the prophecies is its prediction that the Russian empire will come back to the Catholic faith in the near future. First, it presupposes a continuation of Christ’s millennial reign on Earth (One thousand years of the Church’s rule, be it through Rome or Byzantium), even though it is clearly already at an end.  Second, it requires that Russia will either completely abandon Eastern Orthodoxy or modify Eastern Orthodoxy to fit in with Roman Catholicsm (and vice versa)—the latter of which is currently happening through ecumenism. Last but not least, Russia’s current perceived shift to the Right seems to corroborate the Fatima’ prophecy of the consecration of Russia. Why, Russia could only be consecrated if it finally abandoned its Godless communism, and that supposedly happened in the 1990s. In reality, Russia is merely feigning a turn to the Right as part of its old Leninist strategy of leading its opposition, namely conservatives/Christians/nationalists, into a trap.  To lure them into this trap, the Soviets must pretend to be like their opponents. Russia is still communist, although it is a much more developed and chameleonic collectivism, which is spreading to each corner of the world. Therefore, Fatima could not be fulfilled by a fake consecration.


Russia to heal Great Schism, create world religion?

Vladimir Putin hints at one world religion during September speech praising Russia’s multi-culturalism.

During the Revolution, a big part of the Leninist strategy was to infiltrate and control not only the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) at home but also the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) abroad. The former was achieved in 1918 with the ousting of St. Tikhon, the latter achieved with the communist Judeo-masonic subversion of the Vatican no later than the 1960s, culminating in the anti-Christ Second Vatican Council. However, the communists learned that since “the gates of hell will not prevail” against Christ’s Church (they couldn’t eradicate altogether Christianity from the hearts of all of the Russian people), they would have to infiltrate it, instead of trying to destroy it. With both Churches already under Soviet, Cultural Marxist control by the end of the 1960s, the next step in the Soviet plan was to unite the two Churches—something I imagine we will eventually see soon. What’s more, it appears the following step in this Soviet plan involves creating a world religion (this is consistent with New Age-Jewish messianism/millennarianism), likely to be based in Jerusalem, home to Jewish, Christian, and Muslim shrines. Today, Russia is home to large amounts of devotees to all three faiths, and has been promoting multiculturalism and inter-faith dialogue since the Revolution began. Russia is still very much a philo-Semitic, philo-Islamic nation. Russia has the largest Muslim population in all of Europe and is still run by mainly Jewish oligarchs and mobsters. Unfortunately, it seems that the great majority of Christians in Russia identify as such out of tradition and nationalism, not so much out of sincere belief. While the Church may appear to be growing in Russia, it is a shallow, false revival based in a revived National Bolshevism. Indeed, true Russian Orthodox authorities warned their flocks that the Soviets would, in the future, build grand churches with which to deceive the masses.


Fatima’s carnal message

Instead of looking to Christ’s superior, spiritual Kingdom, which is here with us now, these sincere yet misguided traditional Catholics take seriously this Fatima consecration of Russia and look to a future Earthly kingdom where Russia and, presumably, the world are consecrated to the RCC and peace is brought in.

“In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world,” reads the end of the so-called second secret of Fatima.

Wow! That’s a rather convenient narrative if your Vladimir Lenin in 1917 looking for a way to fool the Catholic world (the majority in Christendom in terms of numbers) into accepting that Russia’s chameleonic communism is a return to God. Theologically speaking, Fatima’s message is outright Protestantism. True Catholicism has never been millenarianist, nor has it given credence to such fantastical privately interpreted visions. This alleged message from the Holy Mother suggests a restoration of the Church on Earth, despite that the Book of Revelation says basically the opposite would happen following Christ’s one thousand-year reign on Earth (the Church age).

Revelation 20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

Revelation 20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

Rev 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,

It seems to say that following the Church Age, Satan would be unleashed for a short time to deceive the world, leading to a great apostasy before the final judgment. We appear to be in this phase right now. So instead of some imagined revival, we can only expect to slide further and further into apostasy before the final judgment. Revelation carries a harsh warning to anyone who would add or take away even one word from the Holy Scriptures. Does Fatima violate this? It appears so. Fatimists are so dedicated to the Fatima message, they seem to hold it on the same level of authority as the Scriptures and Tradition.

The geopolitical inconsistency with Fatima is perhaps even more pronounced. Today, the world is on a terrible and colossal slide into full-fledged apostasy. The momentum is such that it’s hard to believe any God-fearing person could honestly think that a turning point were right around the corner. This fatal error is likely also responsible for the seemingly traditional Catholic support for Putinist Russia and its crypto-Soviet expansion and destruction of Western Civilization. Tainted with the pro-Russian sentiment inherent in the Fatima prophecy, traditional Catholics can only view world events from a pro-Russia view. Thus, if and when Russia and its current Eurasianist agenda succeed in overthrowing the West and the entire world, are tradcats going to believe this will be Christ’s rule on Earth, the time of peace Fatima said it would be? Are they being set up to accept the anti-Christ world religon? We have countless Soviet defectors corroborating the narrative that the Soviets feigned the collapse of communism and are feigning a return to Christianity and conservatism.

Hijacked Vatican brought Fatima’s message to the world

Tradcats also need to realize that it was the Judeo-masonic, communist-infiltrated post-Vatican-II-occupied Holy See that brought these alleged secrets of Fatima to the world. If the secrets were authentic, one would think that anti-Christ Vatican II church would go to any length to suppress these secrets. The logic just doesn’t follow.

There is controversy over whether the third secret was fully disclosed by the Vatican (in the year 2000), and all kinds of speculation surrounds what the complete secret says, one of which is that it spoke of the RCC being infiltrated and becoming the throne of anti-Christ. Well, if this is true, we don’t really need this missing part of the third secret, because it is already very obvious that the RCC, and much of Eastern Orthodoxy, have been hijacked by anti-Christs. Again, Revelation warned that instead of a revival of the Church, she would go into apostasy leading up to the final judgment. Furthermore, the Holy Scriptures seem to suggest that before the final judgment, there would remain only a remnant of the true Church. These revelations appear to be coming true right before our very eyes, as in both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, there are only remnants staying true to the faith and tradition. In the RCC, we have tradcats, sedevacantists, etc. In Eastern Orthodoxy, we have the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA) and individual parishes throughout the Eparchy staying true to tradition. But none of these, unfortunately, make up the majority of the Churches today. They are mere remnants.

Now, if Fatima is indeed a communist ruse to fool tradcats, where does it lead? It can only lead to a re-unified Church, where there is a pseudo healing of the Great Schism between the RCC and Eastern Orthodoxy. Interestingly in Eastern Orthodoxy, some remnant believers and Saints have already warned that the Bolsheviks would one day appear to restore Russian Orthodoxy and rebuild these magnificent churches but that it would all be for show. Indeed, we now know that Leninist and Stalinist strategy involved giving concessions to the ROC. In fact, after the death of St. Tikhon—the last true Patriarch of the ROC, the Bolsheviks put in one of their own as the head of the ROC. This line of succession of impostor patriarchs continues to this day, with “Patriarch” Kirill. Kirill and Pope Francis appear to be on great terms and could be planning a re-unification soon. Eastern Orthodoxy, especially in the ROC, has its own kind of Fatima message. They, like the Fatimists, believe there will be a great revival of Christianity in Russia, despite warnings from the Bible and Remnant believers to the contrary.

There you have it. The heads of both the RCC and ROC are in the hands of the anti-Christ system. There is no sign of any kind of revival or restoration of Russia to either the Sacred Heart of Mary or to even traditional and true Eastern Orthodoxy.

Vancouver one giant Trump Tower, Soviet Chabad laundro-mansion

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 19, 2019 Anno Domini

If we take Trump Tower to mean a place where Sino-Soviet oligarchs can launder their blood-soaked cash, consider Vancouver to be the biggest.

It is one of the most Soviet-penetrated ports in the Western world: Vancouver, the gem city on Canada’s West coast—a once beautiful city now plagued with rampant drug addiction, homelessness, and massive displacement of the European-derived indigenous population, largely due to one of the most inflated housing bubbles in human history. Things are so bad in Vancouver, Vancouver’s heroin-fentanyl-riddled downtown Eastside has become infamous around the world.

Seemingly bewildered civic and national officials continue to fail to find a solution to “the Vancouver model“. But that’s because they fail to identify the root of the problem, which is now out in the open for any non-ostrich to see.

The root of the problem is the Soviet narcotics offensive, with much of Vancouver’s drugs coming from Communist China’s Golden Triangle region, and Sino-Soviet money laundering, which involves the KGB (now FSB), Chinese intelligence, and the Sino-Soviet-Semitic international organized crime syndicate, including Chabad Lubavitch. The Chabad mafia just happens to have a large presence in Vancouver, with at least half a dozen operations in the city.

The provincial government, the socialist BCNDP, has been forced to admit that money laundering is largely responsible for the city’s problem, but they won’t develop this explanation to its necessary conclusion, which is that Vancouver’s problems are by design and part of a long-range Leninist Soviet strategy to destabilize the West. Get the indigenous population, especially its youth, hooked on and killed by drugs, thereby reducing the white, Western population; flood the real-estate market with laundered Soviet cash, much of which is the proceeds from Red narco-terrorism; use the effective housing inflation to drive out the local population; and, finally, increase Chinese-Korean migration to insure against any relapse of said displacement.

This same plot is taking place in several places in the Western world. In California’s Silicon Valley, for example, the exact same thing is happening.

Instead of admitting the root of the problem, Canadian officials ignore any discussion of the matter and, instead, attempt to curb these Soviet active measures by imposing ineffective across-the-board housing taxes on foreign buyers and absentee landlords. They don’t seem to understand that this Soviet plot is not about money. The Soviets don’t care about taxes. They are willing to take loses in order to ensure the advancement of their strategies. It was the Chinese communists, after all, who greatly subsidized the cost of heroin to American soldiers during the Vietnam intervention, as an effective means of destabilizing America’s armed forced. Therefore, Canadian officials need to focus on, at the very least, banning foreign buyers all together, including identifying and stopping the many shell games that Soviet agents like to use in anonymously laundering cash through real estate.

Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou.

Many Sino-Soviet elites, like Communist-controlled Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, own estates in Vancouver’s posh mansion district Shaughnessy, where you will find some completely empty mansions. Wanzhou’s estate mysteriously seems to be in a perpetual state of renovation, like others. These are, effectively, Soviet laundro-mansions. Shaughnessy, which is located very close to the Chabad district of Vancouver, is a microcosm of the macrocosmic Soviet active measure throughout all of Vancouver, Silicon Valley, and in other places in the West. So, too, is Vancouver’s Trump Tower (Toronto, where the same housing bubble exists, also has a mobbed-up Trump Tower). Real estate seems to be the primary instrument through which gangsters and gangster-run governments, like in Marxist Russia, China, and Israel, launder their money.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a devoted Marxist  and son to suspected KGB asset and former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, has done absolutely nothing thus far. Until Canada’s elected officials grow a collective set of functioning gonads and identify the problem, this Soviet penetration is only going to deepen and wreak havoc on Canada.

The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel

Soviet-created anti-Zionist leaflets dropped in Syria depict Israel and the “evil West” running ISIS, as propaganda to agitate the Muslims against West and into Communist hands.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Realizing the truth of the Perestroika deception has changed our understanding of the entire geopolitical game significantly.

This rare knowledge, brought to us by brave souls like Anatoliy Golitsyn, has made everything clearer. We can now see the full scope of Jewish power today in a world swarming with disinformation and controlled opposition.

If Jewish Bolshevik power never left Russia but remained and, as one of its objectives, created and groomed Israel as a Soviet satellite, is it reasonable to assume that the infamous Elders of Zion—the Kahal— are based in Moscow and not Tel Aviv?

Remember that Jewry once used England as its base of operations, thanks to traitors like Oliver Cromwell, and it appears that not long after Judaic ‘Brit’ain helped found the masonic republic of the United States of America, Jewry set its sights on the Holy Russian Empire, not only to eradicate Christian monarchy but also to set up a base of operations for its international super government.

And if the Chosenite base of operations resides in the Lubyanka, whether through its international crime syndicate Chabad Lubavitch, the POLITBURO, or the still-functioning COMINTERN, it can only be reasonable to assume that its Balkanization plan for the Middle East, commonly known as the Oded Yinon Plan, is also directed from Russia. What’s more, the Yinon Plan seems to serve as a model for a global Balkanization scheme, which is nothing more than old Soviet expansionism, with Eurasian-led global collectivism as the ultimate goal.

Well, as it happens, Russia has a long history of fomenting anti-Zionist agitation, especially in the Arab world. When they aren’t dropping leaflets from planes over Syria with cartoons of America and Israel puppeteering ISIS, the crypto-Soviet empire of Russia is directing almost every single liberation organization (color revolutions) in the Arab world and even in the West. These liberation organizations—like the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), for example—have been telling Muslims for decades that they must rise up against the great Zionist power and its Western backers America. Israel and the West are the great Satan, the rhetoric goes. This is an awfully convenient narrative for anti-Western communist expansionist aspirations, isn’t it? In the West, the KGB-run Irish Republican Army (IRA) is anti-Zionist and even overtly Marxist, as was the violent FLQ separatist group in Quebec, Canada. The continuity is all there: “liberation”, anti-Zionism, and Marxism. Yet no one of prominence seems to make these obvious connections. Of course, these liberation fronts are all about “liberating” said nations expressly so that they can be gobbled up by Soviet expansion.

This Soviet agitation of the Muslim world achieves several key goals for Jewish world imperium:

1. It makes possible the potential for creating Islamic terrorism, which can then be used in false flag attacks around the world, not just in Islamic countries. This terrorist threat can be exported to virtually any Soviet satellite or through its criminal network in the West—all the more so when Israel and double agents within Western intelligence are providing cover for the export. With authentic terrorist attacks, it serves by keeping the Jewish people (at home and abroad) in a constant state of fear and in subjugation to their Pharisaic Jewish leaders (as the Protocols of Zion presciently revealed over 100 years ago, “Their anti-Semitism is indispensible to us for the management of our lesser brethren”). The wave of modern terrorism also has the benefit of providing a pretext for Western countries to bring in oppressive police measures on the general population (this also benefits the technocracy aspect of Jewish global conquest: non-stop surveillance, smart grid, environmentalism [also Soviet controlled], etc.)

2. By linking the West to Jewish oppression of the Arab world, the West is discredited and demonized to the Arab world, leaving Muslims sympathetic to Soviet expansionism in the Arab world (Arab oil, among other things) and in the West (including in Ukraine and Europe). This demonization of the West only fuels more indignant Muslim radicals to commit terrorism and/or join Russo-Judeo-controlled false flag capers like ISIS, Al Qaeda, ISIL, etc. in Western countries. 

3. To moderate Muslims, Soviet agitation pits them against the West and even their own Arab leaders (who are mostly KGB assets, like Assad in Syria), because Soviet propaganda has moderates believing that Israel and the West are behind Jihadist groups, which is partially true. Essentially, this is the driving force behind the Balkanization of the Arab world: moderates against radicals, radicals against the West and Israel, moderates and radicals against their own government—just constant infighting. That’s been the Russian-Jewish strategy since Israel was founded in 1948 (Israel’s legitimacy was first officially recognized by the Soviet Union).

4. Finally, with this constant fracturing and splintering of Islamic states, displaced Muslims are left fleeing to the West, which furthers the Russo-Judeo Kalergi plan of diluting white, Western, Christian nations with Muslims, blacks, Asians, etc. in order to create a massive mongrel slave class—primed for a technocratic Orwellian clamp down. Western liberals, who should be more opposed to Islamic immigration than anyone (due to Sharia), have been tricked into supporting the Islamic invasion of the West because they perceive Israeli oppression of the Islamic world as being part of British-American colonialism, which they hate far more than Sharia law. Colonialism, however liberals perceive it, is considered the greatest evil in history. Therefore, they feel a sense of guilt and sympathy to the perceived plight of the Islamic world. This Leftist perception did not come about by accident. It was planned this way. Now, Leftists are falling for the gambit and cheerleading the Kalergi plan.

5. The perception of Russia as the anti-Zionist hero of the Middle East and as an Orthodox Christian ethno state serves the final goal of hoodwinking the last bastion of opposition to global communism: Western nationalists/conservatives. Win them over and it’s game over. This is where we are at today. Putinist Russia and the Trump regime are all about streamling conservative/nationalist sentiment into communist hands in Russia. The Western Left is already Marxist; all that is left is to honeypot conservatives and anti-communists. This goal is almost a done deal, as most in the alt media and in the nationalist cause are pro-Russia, pro-Trump. What the Jewry does next remains to be seen.

Hopefully by now, you can see how both Russia and Israel benefit from anti-Zionism. Anti-Zionism does not hurt Israel. It only plays into Jewry’s hands. Russia plays the good cop while Israel plays the bad cop. The bad cop pushes the Arab world into the seemingly loving arms of the good cop. 

Another benefit of running and controlling the global anti-Zionist movement is that Jewry gets to homogenize their opposition into a smaller, more manageable “opponent”. How many individuals seeking the truth on the Jewish question have been derailed and suckered into becoming anti-Zionist activists? Plenty. Was Rachel Corrie’s death really heroic? Zionism itself has little to do with the age-old Jewish question. The Jewish problem has been around a lot longer than the state of Israel has. In this way, anti-Zionism serves as a distraction.  Kremlin organs like Zerohedge and Russia Insider facilitate this same homogenization scheme but using a slightly harsher tone than anti-Zionism (I wrote an article about this using Russia Insider as an example). It seems that these organs rarely ever cast Israel or Jews in a negative light without first implicating the West.

Ultimately, Zionism serves Jewry by allowing it to control its opposition, its own people (at home and abroad), as well as Christian Zionists, and allows Russia to control the Arab world. Control of the Arab world gives Russia, in cooperation with China, the resources it needs to economically and genetically overthrow the West and helps it to water down and weed out opponents to world Jewish collectivism.

The Left’s fake anti-Russia narrative explained

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 12, 2019 Anno Domini

The Jewish money power has set up the Western Left to oppose only a caricature of Putinist Russia, as part of a false dichotomy ruse to confuse and demoralize the public.

This caricature has been carefully crafted as some far-right, “xenophobic”, fascist regime that is allying itself with other similar regimes in Europe, including in Hungary, Poland, and France. And more disturbingly, the media, both in the West and in Russia, is portraying Orthodox Christianity as a driving force behind this supposed fascist bloc.

To the Left, this is just further confirmation Christianity and conservatism are authoritarian and generally bad for societal progress. To the equally misinformed Right, Putinist Russia is a champion of authentic conservatism, anti-globalism, and of Christianity. Therefore, Western conservatives ought to support Putinist Russia over even its own Western leaders, who are nothing but corrupt and immoral.

But what is really happening is that the money power is leading both sides to a predetermined outcome, with neither the Left legitimately opposing nor the Right cognizantly supporting the true Russia.

Russia is not fascist. It is the same Russia as that established by Vladimir Lenin at the time of the October Revolution, only this time, it’s wearing a new mask. As part of its global conquest, it is only using conservatism to bait Westerners into supporting the final collapse of the Western system, which is clearly on its last legs. This collapse has been carefully engineered for decades by the crypto-Soviet’s long-range strategists. Meanwhile, the Left is playing the all-too-willing opponent, going along with the whole charade. To make it all the more convincing, the money power is allowing the Left to expose, to a certain degree, Russia’s ongoing KGB active measures, the biggest of which being the Soviet placement of Donald Chump in the White House (Obama, too, was KGB installed). However, this revelation of Russia’s active measures is not being portrayed as part of Russia’s true communist/collectivist agenda but, instead, as a fascist, therefore Christian, plot. See the twist? How clever. Communism commits the crime but its enemy takes the fall for this crime.

This is where we are at today. The more the Left opposes the fascist caricaturized Russia, the further the Right feels confirmed in supporting Russia. The result is a further polarization of the two Western sides, further division, and further vulnerability to external forces. Russia and its Sino-Semitic alliance is the sole beneficiary in this divide-and-conquer game.

If the Left were legitimately opposed to Russia, they would identify and reveal the Soviet long-range game going on. They would ally themselves with the Right in the face of external threat. If the Right knew the real Russia, it wouldn’t be supporting its own demise but, instead, it would work to reform its corrupt and immoral leadership in the West. That is the only defense against the Soviet threat. But neither side is doing what they should. This is proof that they are both being led to a predetermined outcome—by the Jewish money power. The goals of the crypto-Soviet Union is the same as that of World Jewry—global collectivism, with Christianity, nationalism, tradition, and conservatism snuffed out forever.

Technocracy critic won’t finger true culprits behind it

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 17, 2018 Anno Domini

Apparently Kremlin state media RT decided anti technocrat Patrick Wood was so little a threat that they decided to give him a voice. And why shouldn’t they? For, Wood blames technocracy and the New World Order on the West and shadowy vague groups. Russia and Israel must be innocent, according to Wood.

Members of the shadowy Trilateral Commission are solely responsible for terrorizing the world with their green-washed sustainable development, transhumanist, technocratic utopian pipe dream.

That’s what author Patrick Wood, one of the most outspoken critics of technocracy, claims in his 2015 book Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.

“Technocracy is being sponsored and orchestrated by a global elite led by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Trilateral Commission,” Wood says. (pg. xiii.)

While Wood does a fairly good job illustrating the effects of this globalist agenda in his 274-page book, he fails to provide the key element of motive for the Trilaterals’ multi-generational push for global technocratic communitarianism. What motivates this group? Around which force do they rally? The same could be asked about the other two groups oft targeted by vague conspiracy researchers—Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Wood attempts to provide some motive by using Senator Barry Goldwater’s explanation of Trilateral objectives.

“The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, co-ordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centres of power—political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical.”

Wood fails to identify the one group that has sought these very objectives for over 2,000 years, the one group with more motive and technological know-how than the Trilateral Commission. Crypto-Soviet Russia and China, their progeny Israel, and international usurers are the Jewish revolutionary group lurking behind it all, with the freemasons at their side.

Of course, Jews are overrepresented on the membership lists of all three organizations: Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, and the CFR. It is, however, more difficult to assess the number of freemasons comprising membership; although, one can be certain that their numbers are also overrepresented. Wood employs inconsistent logic when he points out the overrepresentation of Trilateral members among the technocracy movement but then ignores the Jewish overrepresentation on the Trilateral Commission (and Bilderberg and CFR). On page 58, Wood makes the point that Trilaterals dominate the U.S. Federal Reserve—an absurd observation given that the Fed is an undeniable Jewish scheme.

Wood sources the foundation of technocracy—the driving “scientific” ideology behind the New World Order and its vision for world government—in the Enlightenment’s positivism movement, scientism, progressivism, Darwinism, fascism, socialism, and, finally, Technocracy Inc., through men like Henry Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte, Thorstein Veblen, and Howard Scott. Even though Judeo-masonic kabbalism lurks behind all of these movements, Wood can’t seem to make the obvious connection. 

Astonishingly, Technocracy Inc.’s 1934 study course foresaw back then what came to be realized in the last decade as the “smart grid” and “internet of things”, complete with “continuous 24 hour-per-day total net conversion of energy” thanks to such devices as harmful microwave-emitting “smart meters”, which are now on almost every home and business in the developed world. The plan would also involve a complete transformation of the monetary system—away from being pegged to gold or oil and, instead, towards energy proxies such as carbon. This has all been made possible by the United Nations and its Agenda for the 21st century (Agenda 21).


An alliance of Israeli, Russian, and Chinese tech firms are entrenched in the worldwide smart grid system, thanks in large part to stealing much of the technology from the West, and are setting up their new Silk Road to global governance.

The strength of Wood’s Technocracy Rising lies in his knowledge of the total-surveillance smart grid and the greenwashing that must accompany it. And while it is good that Woods is bringing awareness to this extremely important subject, he does a disservice to the world by omitting the true culprits behind it and their dark objective for mankind.

The real goal of technocracy is the “olam ha ba” or “world to come”, in which Jews, finally, will be recognized globally as the master race, tasked with the enlightenment (enslavement) of gentiles and lordship over all the universe through techno-based communism, similar to that established in the fictional yet prescient 1984 work by Orwell. Collectively, they will act as the messiah figure, using the merging of man and machine to achieve, they believe, what Christ did when He defeated death at the Holy Cross—immortality.

Russia Insider is a honeypot

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 12, 2018 Anno Domini

Russia Insider is the rebirth of Russian-Jewish oligarch Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

Both strategically use anti-Jewish narratives in order to honeypot gullible people, at which point the sticky-lipped dupes are either rounded up and imprisoned or simply indoctrinated.

It is the latter in the case of Russia Insider, which is a go-to source for many Westerner alternative media junkies and Russia supporters.

Started in 2014 with the help the Kremlin and its oligarchic mafia (like Duginist Konstantin Malofeev), at the time when the neo-Bolshevik Putin regime was amping up its aggression against Ukraine, Russia Insider is the perfect Soviet double agent within the Western nationalist movement (not the first time the nationalist movement was infiltrated by the Soviets). They say all the right things at the right time, but when push comes to shove, they play the Judas Goat and mislead their audience into a Soviet Trust land of hypernormalized confusion and disinformation. One of Russia Insider’s creators, John Helmer, is alleged to have been recruited by the KGB. Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman has been featured on Kremlin-state media.

Looking at the lead article today at Russia Insider: “CHUTZPAH: CIA/Mossad Instigate Chemical Attack in Syria, Accuse Syria of Doing It”, the Soviet active measure of demoralizing the West is furthered. Instead of being told the truth, that Israel and Russia are the main players destroying Syria with largely Russian-groomed Chechen Jihadists, the clever crypto-Soviets spin it to being the fault of the “evil West”…then throw Israel in the mix as the gambit (notice it puts the CIA first, before Mossad). Peruse the rest of the site and all you will find are “articles” that can’t say enough great things about Putin and the Kremlin.

Russia Insider editor Charles Bausman featured on Kremlin-controlled state media multiple times.

Of course, this is all OK with Israel, because Israel is simply helping big brother Russia execute its long-range goal of demoralizing and destabilizing the West. Israel doesn’t mind being thrown under the bus, so long as it serves the overall goal of destroying the West and bringing it within the grip of its Judeo global governance scheme, with Israel, Russia, and China leading the world into the “Olam ha ba”. And what better cover than for Russia Insider to pretend to be opposed to globalism, a case of the fox guarding the chicken coup.

Almost all of the Western alternative media serves very much the same purpose: blame everything on the West (resulting in divide-and-conquer polarization), vindicate Russia and Arab Soviet satellites (Iran, Syria, etc.). This game is so obvious. Putin is not mystical or that unpredictable. His hypernormalization strategy is now out in the open. He is simply a more sophisticated Soviet leader pursuing the usual active measures against the West, but this time, he has a lot more Western leaders compromised than his predecessors had—take for example Angela Merkel in Soviet satellite Germany. Putin’s Red predecessors only really had Eastern Germany to puppeteer. Now the Kremlin has all of it and its largest economy in the European Union.

Right-wing Catholic media—gatekeepers for masonic anti-Catholic hate industry

By Jude Duffy
Dec. 9, 2018 Anno Domini

In 2007, Cardinal George of Chicago responded to calls from organised Jewry for the Catholic Church to abandon  its prayer for the conversion of the Jews, by suggesting that the Jews themselves might consider removing anti-Christian passages from the Talmud (I). A short time later, Cardinal George found himself accused of “covering up” sexual abuse in his diocese. As coincidences go, this is right up there with former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook dying suddenly weeks after writing in the Guardian that “Al Qaeda” was just another name for the CIA’s Arab assets (2).

Predictably, right-wing traditional Catholics saw nothing fishy about the timing of the accusations against Cardinal George. Traditional Catholics, you see, are avid tinfoil hat coincidence theorists, and never see anything fishy about media targeting of Catholics. Like these media, they long ago abandoned the very traditionally Catholic principle of innocent until proved guilty, and are more than happy to play the role of Judas goats leading committed Catholics to the New World Order slaughter.

But hang on, I hear you say, surely the traditional Catholics are right to blast the Church over its cover-ups of heinous crimes? Well, yes, when the crimes have been proven in a court of law – not, as in the case of the recent Pennsylvania hysteria – when most of the cases have never been tried at all.

There’s an absurd contradiction at the heart of traditionalist denunciations of bishops and the “Catholic establishment” over the clerical scandals: in many of the cases they condemn the bishops for “covering up”, it is the bishops and their bureaucrats who have summarily found priests – living and deceased – guilty, without a proper investigation – much less a trial – ever having taken place. Thus, on the one hand, the trad Catholics unquestioningly accept the utter nonsense of men and women who have no authority or expertise whatsoever to adjudicate on criminal matters, pronouncing the guilt of priests who have never been tried in a court of law. Then the same trads hysterically chimp out about the bishops and bureaucrats “covering up” the crimes of priests – when the only authority they have to substantiate these priests’ guilt is the word of this same Catholic bureaucracy.

So which is it? Are the bishops and Catholic bureaucrats corrupt enablers or not? And if they are corrupt enablers, why do trads take their completely unqualified pronouncements of priests’ criminal guilt as the legal equivalent of holy writ?

It’s safe to say that most folk, including most Catholics, know nothing, and couldn’t care less about the “Catholic traditionalist movement”. But that doesn’t stop this “movement” exerting a subtle, defeatist influence on the wider Catholic culture. Indeed it’s not going too far to say that if the Catholic trad movement didn’t exist, the globalists would have had to invent it. Then again perhaps they did.

Take Malachi Martin, a great hero to Catholic traditionalists in the 1980s and 1990s. An Irish Jesuit, Martin wrote a series of books decrying the modernist takeover of contemporary Catholicism. Surprisingly, given their radical right-wing conspiracist content, these books always found mainstream corporate publishers.

Maybe though it wasn’t such a surprise after all. Though he modestly kept it to himself throughout his latter day career as a super-trad Catholic, Martin, knew the anti-Catholic conspiracy from the inside. According to Robert Keiser, Time magazine’s correspondent at the Vatican Council in the early 1960s,  Martin received large sums of money from  the American Jewish Committee to use his influence to get the Council to alter Catholic teaching on the Jews – teachings which up to that point had held the Jews (the religion, not the race) culpable for Christ’s crucifixion. Keiser also alleged that Martin seduced Keiser’s wife, using the funds he received from the AJC (3) .

Martin still has his defenders within Catholic traditionalism, but no one seriously disputes that during the Council, writing under the name ‘Michael Serafian’, he laid the blame for historical anti-semitism directly at the door of the Catholic Church – thus echoing the anti-Catholic discourse of the Judeo-Masonic establishment of B’nai Brith and its offshoot, the ADL (4).

In the 1970s and 1980s, Martin re-invented himself as a fierce traditionalist Catholic critic of post Vatican II liberalism in the Church, but even in this role, he often hinted at distinctly un-Catholic facets to his character. The Canadian Catholic traditionalist, Bernard Janzen, conducted a series of taped interviews with Martin in the mid 1990s, in one of which Martin claimed to be personally acquainted with elite New York Satanists, whom he extolled as highly respectable men “whose word was their bond” ( see ‘The Deep Descent’: Malachi Martin interviewed by Bernard Janzen: Triumph Communications). Maybe Martin was indulging in Mitty-esque fantasies, or maybe he really did hobnob with Satanists, but either way his statements should have led Catholic trads to treat his narratives about the Church and the world with caution.

Not a bit of it. Far from shunning Martin, trads exalted him to the status of a modern prophet – the more lurid his tales of Satanism and rampant homosexuality in the higher echelons of the Church the more they lapped it up.

What was Martin’s game? Surely a Zionist/Masonic anti-Catholic agent in the Church would espouse liberal modernism rather than traditionalism? Not necessarily. In truth, the Church’s enemies viewed the capture of the conservative and traditionalist wings of the Church as the grandest prize of them all, since they knew that many practicing Catholics saw liberal-left Catholics as CINOs – Catholics in name only. A Judas goat can’t lead the lambs to the slaughter if they know he’s a Judas goat. Just as crypto-Trotskyist Neocons took over the right-wing political parties of most western nations by posing as hardline anti-communists, Neocon Catholics took over both the conservative and tradtionalist wings of the Catholic Church by posing as old-school anti-modernists.

Hence in the 1990s, Zionist oligarchs bought up conservative Catholic publications such as Crisis in Catholicism (renamed ‘Crisis‘ at the oligarchs’ insistence), and turned them into Neocon propaganda journals (5). In 2005, the former editor of the Catholic New Oxford Review, Dale Vree, revealed that a Jewish businessman had offered to fund his publication on condition that it promoted Neocon foreign policy and neo-liberal economics (6). Even in Ireland, the right-wing Catholic magazine, The Brandsma Review, mixed articles promoting the Latin Mass and conservative social policies with arguments in favour of mass immigration, support for the Iraq War, sanctions on Iran, and Israel’s 2006 invasion of Lebanon. By the early ‘90s, so called conservative Catholic journalism had become Neocon occupied territory.

By the same token, EWTN, the Catholic religious TV network, has close ties to Freemasonry via the Knights of Columbus (7) – ties reflected in the station’s de facto ban on any criticism of either Protestantism or Masonry.

The Neocon Catholics  and the Remnant style trads had their differences – mostly over Pope John Paul II (the Neocons loved him, the trads were less than keen) but tellingly the one thing they always agreed on was that dissent from the media’s version of the Catholic clerical sex abuse scandals was forbidden.

Indeed if anything defines the modern right-wing Catholic media, it is the unswerving principle that Catholics must never even imply that Zio-media coverage of the scandals is in any way anti-Catholic or disproportionate. How very fortuitous for those who hate the Church, to have the most ostensibly hardcore Catholics of them all singing from the same Masonic anti-Catholic songbook as the Southern Poverty Law Centre and the New York Times. What greater example of full spectrum dominance could one find in the modern world?

Significantly, in recent years the trads and the Catholic neocons have drawn much closer together. Thus, Austin Ruse, a Catholic convert and arch-Neocon, who once called the Zionist war criminal George W.Bush, “America’s first Catholic President” (8), recently expressed strong support for traditionalist attacks on the Catholic hierarchy.

Another raving Neocon, Elizabeth Yore, writes hysterical tirades attacking the Church over the clerical scandals for traditionalist Catholic outlets like The Remnant, and regularly appears in similar Catholic bashing vein on EWTN’s current affairs show “The World Over’, hosted by Raymond Arroyo. Yore, it should be noted, boasts of being a former “children’s advisor” to pro-abortion New Ager Oprah Winfrey, and used to work for the UN – an organisation not renowned for a blameless record when it comes to the exploitation of children.

Like Yore, Raymond Arroyo – in the company of his fellow Neocons Fr Gerard Murray and Robert Royal – habitually denounces the Church over the clerical scandals, but slavers like the proverbial lovesick puppy in the presence of trashy Hollywood celebs – which, if nothing else, indicates that his outrage over institutional tolerance of sexual abuse is rather selective. An unabashed Israel Firster, he has also outspokenly defended British and U.S.  torture of War on Terror prisoners, and vitriolically denounced the Obama administration’s lifting of sanctions on Iran.

As with their Neocon political counterparts, the pioneers of Neocon Catholicism often turn out to have distinctly left-wing pasts: The late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, a convert form Lutheranism, and advisor to war criminal George W Bush, was a left-wing activist in the 1960s, while the late Michael Novak, another EWTN favourite, led the American liberal left Catholic dissent against Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul’s 1968 encyclical condemning contraception.

EWTN these days spends much of its time urging Catholics to masochistically cheer on the secular media’s anti-Catholic hate campaign, but no one on the network ever mentions, much less condemns the MSM’s longstanding cover-up of paedophile rings in the secular establishment and Hollywood, just as no one queries why these corporate outlets suppress all news about sexual abuse among rabbis and clerics of mainline Masonic Protestant denominations.

When the British police stated that accusations of sexual abuse against late former British Prime Minister Ted Heath and other U.K. political big-wigs were highly credible, the same media that portray every accusation against Catholic clerics as self-evidently true ferociously attacked Heath’s accusers as paranoid fantasists. Quite incredibly some right-wing “Catholic” outlets joined in the smear campaign (9).

Anyone who believes sexual abuse is a predominantly Catholic problem lives on Planet Zog. In his memoir of his childhood, ‘Surprised By Joy’, C.S. Lewis recalled that at the English Protestant boarding school he attended in the early 1900s, sodomy of pre-pubescent boys by adult males was insitutionalised – and the chief topic of conversation in the school (10). After his death, Lewis’s brother, Warnie, who attended the same school, posthumously rebuked C.S. for blackening their school’s reputation – not because he denied that sodomy of children described by C.S Lewis went on there, but rather because he had discovered in conversations with officer colleagues in the British army, that most British boarding schools were much of a muchness in this regard (11) .

Don’t, however, hold your breath waiting for the MSM – or indeed the curiously philo-Protestant Catholic right – to call for inquiries into historical sexual abuse at Anglo-Protestant schools or institutions.

As for the trads themselves, they have shown themselves to be very quick learners when it comes to regurgitating the Neocon anti-Catholic script. Not so long ago The Remnant regularly published pieces championing the writings of Fr. Denis Fahey and Fr. Edward Cahill, two 20th century priests famous for their critiques of Judeo-Masonry and Anglo-Protestant Masonry. Even though both men insisted that racial hatred against Jews was gravely sinful, and that ordinary Jews were themselves victims of the machinations of Judeo-Masonry, the modern liberal elite have long excoriated these priests as raving anti-semites.

In 2007, the Southern Poverty Law Centre put The Remnant on a hate map of the US (12), after which The Remnant never mentioned Fr Fahey and Fr Cahill again, and its editor Michael Matt had a $20,000 security system installed in his home to protect against attacks from Antifa. A prudent precaution on his part no doubt, but notice how the trads – with just cause – fear the thuggery of the rabidly anti-Catholic far left, but yet actively collaborate with these thugs and their globalist sponsors to reduce the Catholic Church’s name to mud. If that isn’t religious Stockholm Syndrome, what is?

A couple of years after the SPLC debacle, Matt and his lawyer sidekick Christopher Ferrara both wrote articles excluding those who had any truck with “wacky conspiracy theories” about things like 9/11 and the JFK’ murder, from membership of “the traditionalist movement” (13) – thus formalising Catholic trads’ role as right-wing gatekeepers for the anti-Catholic Zio-establishment. Apparently, anti-Catholic conspiracy theories are the only conspiracy theories trads will tolerate these days.

Not to be outdone, the once very radical traditionalist critic of modern globalism, Robert Sungenis, deleted all conspiracy and anti-Zionist content from his site a few years ago, in response to pressure from Zionists; In an exchange with Dr. E. Michael Jones in Culture Wars magazine, he argued that given the scandalous behaviour of Catholic clerics in recent times, Catholics no longer had any right to point the finger at Jewish tribalists or other non-Catholics over the state of the world (14).

How very convenient: if you can’t beat the globalists, join them in bashing the Church. After all, unlike the globalists, the Church doesn’t lock you up for hate crimes and doesn’t send Antifa goons to hurl bags of urine and HIV infected shit at you. To paraphrase Stalin, how many divisions of masked thugs armed with mace and diy flame-throwers does the Pope have?

It’s one thing to refrain from telling the whole truth for reasons of worldly prudence—a stance which may or may not be justified depending on circumstances—but quite another to side with the sworn enemies of the Church as a form of displacement activity.

 

The Remnant regularly bans contributors from its forum’s comments who take issue with the unrelenting psychic driving media hate campaign against the Catholic Church over the clerical scandals but happily publishes on the same forums the most lurid anti-Catholic smears imaginable – stuff that makes 19th century crazed Papist bashing of the Masonic Know Nothings and the Ku Klux Klan seem mild by comparison. But once again, the robot-like trad punters lap it up – gaslighted as they are to believe that the authenticity of one’s Catholic traditionalism is measured by how relentlessly one hammers the post-conciliar Catholic Church.

As the Welsh Protestant academic Philip Jenkins noted in his book ‘Paedophiles And Priests’, 19th Century crypto-Masonic sects such as the Know Nothings, the Klan, the Orange Order, and the American Protective Association, sought to portray the Catholic Church as a den of perverts in much they same way as the media and liberal establishment do today (15); the crucial difference these days being that Catholics on left and right noisily collaborate in this relentless black propaganda war against their own religion.

The trads and the Neocon Catholics endlessly whine about the ghastliness of the Francis papacy (if papacy it be) but it never seems to occur to them that their own adolescent scorched earth approach to “cleansing the Church” might be to blame for the weakness of modern popes and bishops. After all, why should any pope or any prelate fight the Zio-globalists when they know for a certain fact that to do so will place them in the firing line of the MI5/Mossad hatchet men – folk who have an impressive facility to conjure from nowhere scandals implicating enemies of the NWO? They also know for a certain fact that when this happens, the armchair counter-revolutionaries of the trad movement will be the first to throw them under the bus, a la Cardinal George.

Much of the old-school traditionalist critique of the modern Church – as articulated by the late Archbishop Lefebvre and lay activists such as the late Hamish Fraser – had great merit. The problem is that today’s generation of Catholic trads often behave like half-baked teenage punks, yearning for the modern Church to be destroyed in pursuit of some juvenile idea of “purification”. They never get around to explaining how this much smaller “purified” Church they claim to be fighting for will escape the same relentless secular onslaught that is laying waste to great swathes of the Catholic world right now. After all, their own less-than-heroic antics today don’t fill one with optimism that they will be a match for the forces of the NWO.

Another late great Catholic traditionalist writer, Solange Hertz, once observed that modern Catholic traditionalists tend to suffer from a virulent form of lay clericalism, devoting most of their energies to issues they have no authority to resolve- such as Church governance – while declining to engage with their true province – secular politics. In other words, trads don’t know how to mind their own business.

Alternative types may not like hearing it, but it is far from happenstance that the massive intensification of the cultural revolution in the last two decades has coincided with the huge loss of authority the Catholic Church has suffered on foot of the abuse scandals. Everything, from the rise of transgenderism to Neocon wars to immigrant invasions of the West can be traced back to this spiritual and cultural calamity. Like it or not, the Catholic Church is the locus of moral authority in the world.

Maybe, therefore, it is time both the trads and David Icke style Catholic bashers tried for once to honestly answer the key question in all of this: why, if the Church is such a corrupt and powerful arm of the establishment, do the globalists devote so much of their energy to seeking to destroy its standing?

Notes available on request.

Jewish ritual murder revisited

By Honest Media Today (2005)

Here is an excellently documented presentation on Jewish ritual murder throughout history. The documentary starts off with three minutes of textual information but then begins with the presentation at the 3:14 mark.

Click here to watch Jewish Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult