Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory

Untitled-1

 Part I

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
February 3, 2015 Anno Domini

While agents of the Jewish-Masonic cryptocracy work around the clock spreading lies and disinformation, many sincere people are getting sucked into their traps. One of the fastest spreading fallacies of these agents is the conspiracy theory that the Catholic Church—through the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), the Pope, and/or the supposedly still-existing Knights Templars—are running the New World Order conspiracy.

“It’s not the Jews!” these agents and their naïve dupes claim. “We have been fooled for the last 400 years into thinking the Jews are leading the NWO when it’s really the Jesuits, the Vatican, and the Black Pope!”

The game of these agenturs is very simple. Everything that has been typically attributed to Jews for hundreds of years, for example, the creation of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the drafting of the Satanic Babylonian Talmud, and even Zionism itself, are all the work of the Jesuits. It’s a rewriting of history. Take every historical book from the last 2,000 years that names “Jews,” cross it out, and replace it with “Catholics” or some euphemistic term that indicts the Church and you have the Jesuit conspiracy meme summed up.

From attributing the creation of Zionism to an excommunicated Jesuit named Franciso Ribera to blaming the rise of Hitler and Nazism on the Church, there is no place the Jesuit memers won’t go. It borders on clownish with absurd claims that the Jesuits sunk the Titanic, created Islam, and assassinated John F. Kennedy. Of course, the grand proof they present of this alleged Jesuit conspiracy is Jewish Adam Weishaupt’s (founder of the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati) education under the Jesuits—something these Jesuit memers almost always bring up. Hypocrisy runs deep among these anti-Catholics, as they say in one breath that it is wrong to blame one group of people (especially Jews) and in the next breath they blame all the world’s problems on the Church. These clowns must have low regard for their audience for them to believe their blatant double standard goes unnoticed.

One hand tied behind the back
Before I go on here, I want to point out that this is not to absolve the Catholic Church of clerical abuses and legitimate corruption within it. And, of course, there is the heretical Second Vatican Council that has been foisted upon Catholics, which further maligns the legitimate faith and demonizes (at least in Protestant eyes) Catholics in general. This council is the handcuff that has one hand of the Church behind its back—done so that She would not be able to defend herself against the Judeo-Masonic onslaught going on. With the Church on the ropes, so to speak, the Jesuit meme is a sucker punch.

*a note on semantics

Meme
I would define a meme as the mindless replication or imitation of a concept or idea, especially a false one. Much of the popularity of the Jesuit meme is due to dupes, especially in conspiracy circles, who mindlessly accept, without verifying, the Jesuit meme and then replicate it.

53a5fd185b71aProponents of the Jesuit conspiracy meme
Based on their worldview, the Jesuit conspiracy meme is a convenient scapegoat and tool of self-deception for several groups, including but not limited to:

  • Jewish groups, Zionists (Jewish and Protestant)
  • Seventh Day Adventists
  • COINTELPRO
  • New or naïve conspiracy researchers
  • New Agers
  • Evangelicals, fundamentalist Protestants, Calvinists
  • Freemasons, Enlightenment thinkers
  • Catholic haters

The idea that Jews are running the NWO is rather inconvenient for them and exposes them for what they are. You would be hard pressed to find a Jesuit memer who is the slightest bit anti-Zionist. Many of them also happen to endorse other irregular conspiracy theories, like that of “reptilians” and “death fakers”. Then there are some who pretend to be anti-Zionist but with the appendage that the Vatican is really behind the Zionists. The fact of the matter is, the idea that there exists a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy has been a cultural belief for hundreds of years; whereas the Jesuit conspiracy is the counter-culture belief, in other words, the revolutionary belief. Furthermore, the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory has a huge amount of evidence behind it while the Jesuit theory has next to none. Jesuit theorists count on memetic replication, because if one actually checks their claims against recorded history, they theorists will be revealed as frauds.

Eric Jon Phelps Cointelpro Zionist 2

Key individuals promoting the Jesuit conspiracy meme

  • Alexander Hislop (rabid anti-Catholic Protestant)
  • Malachi Martin (Vatican infiltrator paid by the American Jewish Committee)
  • Eric Jon Phelps (Israeli diamond merchant)
  • Edward Hendrie (Calvinist)
  • Seventh Day Adventists (masonic)
  • Christian J. Pinto
  • Thomas Richards
  • Craig Oxley (internet personality, disinfo agent)
  • Greg Szymanski
  • Dan Brown (fiction writer, not even an historian)
  • Tupper Saussy (bitter Protestant)
  • Felix Pantaleon, aka Caliberhitter (COINTELPRO)
  • Sherman Skolnick

The list of Internet personalities replicating the Jesuit meme seems to be growing by the day.

Common fallacious arguments of the Jesuit conspiracy meme

  • The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) created Freemasonry (through the Knights Templars] and is implicitly masonic itself
  • Excommunicated Jesuit Francisco Ribera created Zionism/premillennial dispensationalism
  • The Jesuits/Vatican control the monetary system
  • The Jesuits control Hollywood
  • The RCC created the religion of Islam (yes, they really claim this)
  • The RCC created the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati through Jesuit-trained (actually a converso) Adam Weishaupt
  • The RCC published (created?) the Babylonian Talmud
  • The RCC created the Nazis and is responsible for all anti-Semitism
  • The Jesuits are behind the CIA, Federal Reserve, and communism
  • The Jesuits ignited the French and Russian revolutions

Basics of the Jesuit meme: The Black Pope
The Jesuit theorists claim that the head of the Jesuits, the Superior General, is the “Black Pope”—one whose power supersedes that of the Pope and, subsequently, the Holy Church. This Black Pope and his Jesuits are said to be leading the New World Order conspiracy; although, none of the Jesuit memers can give a clear explanation as to what the Jesuits’ supposed goal of world domination is and why they seek this. In contrast, with the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory, the goal is quite clearly the overthrow of Christianity and Western Civilization. With the New World Order, regardless of who one think is leading it, it’s clear to anyone that the NWO conspiracy is attempting to dismantle all religions, especially Christianity. So, why would the supposed leaders of that conspiracy, the Jesuits, be working to destroy their own Christian-based institution? If one says the Jesuits are not Christian in the first place and this is why they are leading the NWO to destroy religion and Christianity, then one has to admit that either a). the Catholic Church also is not a Christian institution (which would require a whole new set of evidence and proof), or b). the Jesuits are saboteurs of the Catholic Church and Christianity in general. If one answers with “a”, then the root of the problem is not the Jesuits but the Catholic Church itself, since the Catholic Church predates the Jesuits. But the Jesuit memers don’t focus on this. The focus is all on the Jesuits. This is the clearest evidence that they have other motives for propagating this theory. Now, if the answer is “b”, then we can speculate as to who is really behind the Jesuits, since it couldn’t be the Catholic Church itself. Seeing as the first Jesuits were overrepresented with Jews and a Jew, one Ignatius Loyola, founded the Jesuits, it’s plausible that a Jesuit conspiracy against the Catholic Church and society were being orchestrated by Jews. Add to this the fact that Jews were closely involved with the Protestant Reformation, around the time the Jesuits were formed, and the plausibility becomes stronger. Further evidence that the Jesuits, if they are acting on behalf of the Church’s interests, are a failed world conspirator is in the fact that world trends are going in the opposite direction of everything Catholic, be it the Church’s pro-life stance, anti-modernism, traditional marriage, etc. Add to that the world’s slide towards nihilism and the Jesuit conspiracy theory loses even more credibility.

The “Black Pope’s” alleged fronts: Knights of Malta, Catholic universities

“Jesuit Trained” - Jesuit conspiracy theorists claim that the Black Pope works to subvert society by positioning Jesuits in high positions of power throughout the world via the Knights of Malta and Jesuit training centres (Jesuit-founded universities). Since Jesuit universities are open to the public and do not require students to be Catholics, much less Jesuits, it’s a little ridiculous for the Jesuit theorists to claim that so and so is a Jesuit agent or “Jesuit trained” merely because they went to a Jesuit-founded university. But that’s exactly what they do. Due to the spread of the disease of modernism, Jesuit universities are now more or less secular and hostile to the Catholic Church. For example, many Jesuit-founded universities advocate—not just accept—homosexual rights, abortion, women’s liberation, LGBT rights, etc. Historian E. Michael Jones, a well respected traditional Catholic, was fired by one of these supposed Catholic universities because he simply stood for traditional Catholicism. Whether a result of the Jesuits or Second Vatican Council proscriptions, these Jesuit universities cannot be considered Catholic other than by having Catholic roots. The claim of someone being “Jesuit-trained” is vague and meaningless in the context in which these Jesuit theorists give. They have to provide more than just someone’s mere attendance at a Jesuit-founded university. And with their claim that many Jesuits are secret members, they think they can disregard the burden of proof further more.

The Scottish and York rites of freemasonry and their degrees—the names of some which were hijacked from the Catholic Church.

The Scottish and York rites of freemasonry and their degrees—the names of some which were hijacked from the Catholic Church.

Knights of Malta – Jesuit theorists, where they can’t malign someone based on their university attendance, malign them by their membership with the Knights of Malta or even if someone displays a logo or symbol[i] bearing the remotest resemblance to the symbols of the Knights of Malta or the Jesuits. If those canards fail, they outright deceive their audience by falsely associating the Catholic Knights of Malta—officially called Sovereign Military Order of Malta—with Freemasonry. Speculative freemasonry’s York Rite has a degree titled Order of Knights of Malta (click on the image to the right to see a larger view of the masonic structure of degrees). The Vatican has issued a clarification stating that it does not recognize any other group using the Malta name but its own.

“…the Holy See recognises and supports only the Sovereign Military Order of Malta – also known as the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta – and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem. The Holy See foresees no additions or innovations in this regard.

All other orders, whether of recent origin or mediaeval foundation, are not recognised by the Holy See. Furthermore, the Holy See does not guarantee their historical or juridical legitimacy, their ends or organisational structures.

To avoid any possible doubts, even owing to illicit issuing of documents or the inappropriate use of sacred places, and to prevent the continuation of abuses which may result in harm to people of good faith, the Holy See confirms that it attributes absolutely no value whatsoever to certificates of membership or insignia issued by these groups, and it considers inappropriate the use of churches or chapels for their so-called “ceremonies of investiture”.[ii]

 

The Jesuit theorists must not have foreseen this embarrassing repudiation of their claims that the Jesuits and the Catholic Church are somehow masonic because of the Malta link. Perhaps had they done some actual research, they would have seen this coming and abandoned the lie. Furthermore, Freemasonry uses Jewish and Protestant names for its degrees as well. Using their reasoning, we could argue that Jews and Protestants are masonic because of this also.

The Knights Templar – Some Jesuit theorists will go so far as to say that the RCC founded freemasonry through the Knights Templar, a military order established by the Church at the beginning of the Middle Ages (the Templars eventually became corrupt and apparently compromised with gnosticism, and the Church disbanded them accordingly). Because the freemasons (an occult group established long after the Catholic Templars had been abolished) have a masonic title called “Order of Knights Templar Commandery”, part of the York Rite initiation, some confuse the two different Templar groups. Of course, the Jesuit theorists capitalize on this confusion and try to say that the two are one and the same. They elaborate on how the Medieval Templars supposedly evolved into what is now called freemasonry (they completely ignore the fact that the Catholic Church abolished the Templar order). The apparent gnostic influence on the Catholic Templars, before they were disbanded, was likely due to the spread of Kabbalism, so the Kabbalah is the root of what eventually became freemasonry, not “Templarism”. Consider that the written Kabbalah came into prominence in the 12th and 13th centuries, the same time the Templars were rising in power.

“The Jewish connection with modern Freemasonry is an established fact everywhere manifested in its history. The Jewish formulas employed by Freemasonry, the Jewish traditions which run through its ceremonial, point to a Jewish origin, or to the work of Jewish contrivers . . . . Who knows but behind the Atheism and desire of gain which impels them to urge on Christians to persecute the Church and destroy it, there lies a hidden hope to reconstruct their Temple, and in the darkest depths of secret society plotting there lurks a deeper society still which looks to a return to the land of Judah and to the re- building of the Temple of Jerusalem?”[iii]

Today, there is no organization called the Knights Templar, yet Jesuit conspiracy sites are full of references to them as if they still exist and run the world. Columnist Atila Sinke Guimarães explains in detail the history of the Knights of Malta and the Templars in contrast with their masonic imitators.[iv]

The suspicious trajectory of the Jesuit conspiracy theory
Whether the Jesuits were guilty of the charges laid against them in their early days, it’s highly suspicious that most, if not all, groups supporting theories against them were in league with Jews, be they Protestant reformers (late middle ages), Enlightenment thinkers, masonic/illuminist agents (18th and 19th centuries), and Jewish lobbies (20th and 21st centuries). All of these anti-Catholic groups are themselves accused of organizing and/or leading international conspiracies, so they have the motive to deflect criticism of themselves and provide a scapegoat in the hopes of saving face. Modern Jesuit conspiracy theorists appear to target two audiences: anti-Catholics and conspiracy researchers. The latter targeting functions to manage opposition to the NWO conspiracy and is further evidence that the Jesuit theorist meme is actually advancing the NWO’s revolutionary progress.

Nazi propaganda phamplet condemning the Jesuits.

Nazi propaganda phamphlet condemning the Jesuits.

The Nazi fallacy
So blind to history, the Jesuit theorists assume that because the Catholic Church is anti-Jewish by nature, restricted Jewish influence in society, especially during the Middle Ages, and helped spread anti-Jewish conspiracy theories, it must be that it was also in league with or brought about the rise of Nazi Germany’s racialist policies. Jewish lobbies share in common with Jesuit theorists this malicious libel against the Church. They blame Catholicism for the rise of Hitler and the alleged Holocaust of 6 million Jews. What they won’t tell their audience is that the Nazis propagated Jesuit conspiracy theories themselves—Hubert Hermanns’ The Jesuit: The Obscurantist without a Homeland[v], for exampleand persecuted and murdered Jesuits on account of their membership. But more importantly, Roman Catholic opposition to Judaism has always been on the grounds of the Jew as a “theological construct” created in opposition to Christ, in the words of Catholic historian E. Michael Jones. Papal decrees against Jews throughout the Church’s 2,000-year history maintains that Jewry should be resisted on the grounds of their rebellion against Christ and that Jews should be restricted from positions of influence in society, should they seek to subvert the Catholic theocracy. Papal bull Sicut Judaeis, first issued during the Middle Ages, is emphatic that Jews are not to be harmed. Furthermore, Catholics are forbidden on pain of excommunication to force convert Jews or take their property. Pope Callixtus II states in the original bull:

“[The Jews] ought to suffer no prejudice. We, out of the meekness of Christian piety, and in keeping in the footprints or Our predecessors of happy memory, the Roman Pontiffs Calixtus, Eugene, Alexander, Clement, admit their petition, and We grant them the buckler of Our protection.”

It’s obvious that because of the Jewish penchant for antagonistic behaviour, the Popes foresaw the potential for resentment of the Jews to evolve into pogroms. It’s absolutely absurd to think that the Catholic Church could in any way have brought about the “Holocaust” of the Jews, especially considering that 18 successive Popes re-affirmed Sicut Judaeis. The Church has not changed its stance in this respect. The Catholic Church never endorsed, either officially or unofficially, the policies of Hitler and the national socialists. Catholic opposition to Judaism then is quite different from Nazi opposition, which was based entirely on the assumption that Jews were racially corrupt.

The Jesuit theorist runs into a major contradiction when he attempts to say that Nazism is a Jesuit creation, because then he must account for his other theory that the Jesuits also supposedly created Zionism—something that runs contrary to Nazism. I won’t elaborate here, but the evidence suggests that Nazism is actually a Jewish creation, using a Cabbalist dialectic of opposites, which paved the way for establishing the illegal state of Israel in 1948 as well as the Holocaust dogma of Judaism[vi], which has undeservedly become iconic in recent history. There is also evidence that Hitler was not legitimate opposition to the Jewish money power, and even evidence that Hitler himself may have been Jewish.[vii]

Protestants Rewrite Bible

The Zionist fallacy
It seems the Jesuit theorist rests his entire claim that the Jesuits created Zionism on one obscure Jesuit who postulated a theory that was never established as Catholic dogma. It’s true that Jesuit Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) did advocate some views that would fall into a “futurist” eschatological point of view; however, it was not millenarianist, or of the premillennial dispensationalist type that lies at the root of the Christian Zionist heresy.[viii] Zionism comes from an arrested rendering of the Old Testament concept of a chosen people. This is why the Jews murdered the Old Testament prophets who tried to correct them on their perverted supremacist vision of what it meant to be God’s chosen people. This is one of the reasons why the Jews also murdered our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, for He pointed out the deception and evil in their supremacist yearnings. The whole Ribera claim is inconsistent in that Ribera allegedly concocted his views as counter-reformation teaching. But the Reformation was advocating futurism (specifically millenarianism), so how could he be countering it with more futurism (his supposed futurism was really amillennial)? Jesuit theorists are grasping at straws with this one. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that because the Jews rejected Jesus, they still await at future Messiah (futurism) when he will supposedly rule and reign with the Jews on the present Earth. Futurism, really messianism, is essentially Jewish. Furthermore, Ribera didn’t write his 500-page commentary on the Book of Revelation to start a new idea. He was indeed countering the Reformation propaganda of millenarianism, which held that the Papacy was the anti-Christ, Beast system, and the coming world messiah would destroy it and set up his millennial reign on Earth, headquartered in Jerusalem. Catholic teaching holds that the Church’s reign on this Earth since Christ died and was resurrected is evidence of fulfillment of Christ’s reign on Earth; therefore, a future millennial reign is not necessary.

The freemason fallacy
Equally as absurd and related to the Zionist fallacy is the claim that modern freemasonry is a continuation of the Catholic Knights Templars—Catholicism itself. Forget that Popes have issued decrees condemning freemasonry and its Enlightenment, libertarian offshoots; forget that Catholicism itself is philosophically and ideologically opposed to freemasonry, the Jesuit theorists are most persistent with this fallacy. Instead of providing any evidence that the Catholic Church is behind freemasonry, the Jesuit theorist will simply make the reach by associating the Church with freemasonry through the Knights Templars and Knights of Malta confusion. That’s their evidence—semantics.

Papal pronouncements against freemasonry and its offshoots—specifically “Americanism,” which sprang from the Enlightenment and masonic libertarianism—include but are not limited to the following:

Clement XII, Constitution “In Eminenti”, 28 April, 1738;
Benedict XIV, “Providas”, 18 May, 1751;
Pius VII, “Ecclesiam”, 13 September, 1821;
Leo XII, “Quo graviora”, 13 March, 1825;
Pius VIII, Encyclical “Traditi”, 21 May, 1829;
Gregory XVI, “Mirari”, 15 August, 1832;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Qui pluribus”, 9 November, 1846;
Pius IX, Allocution “Quibus quantisque malis”, 20 April, 1849;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Quanta cura”, 8 December, 1864;
Pius IX, Allocution “Multiplices inter”, 25 September, 1865;
Pius IX, Constitution “Apostolicæ Sedis”, 12 October, 1869;
Pius IX, Encyclical “Etsi multa”, 21 November, 1873;
Leo XIII, Encyclical “Humanum genus”, 20 April, 1884;
Leo XIII, “Præclara”, 20 June, 1894;
Leo XIII, “Annum ingressi”, 18 March, 1902 (against Italian Freemasonry);
Leo XIII, Encyclical “Etsí nos”, 15 February, 1882;
Leo XIII, “Ab Apostolici”, 15 October, 1890.

To demonstrate the seriousness with which the Church took of the heresy of freemasonry, 12 different Popes issued a total of 23 three papal pronouncements against it. No other heresy has received more attention.

The Judeo-masonic ambition to overthrow throne (monarchy) and altar (Catholic Church), which is well documented, was achieved through a series of subversions[ix] and revolutions—the French Revolution being one of which was most successful, as France was as stronghold of the Catholic theocracy. England, where Catholicism had been overthrown during the 16th-century reign of apostate King Henry VIII, was already under the control of freemasonry (specifically Rosicrucianism) and Enlightenment thought at the time of the French Revolution. Of course, the Jewish-masonic alliance was already well established during the 16th-century Protestant Reformation, so the Reformation was a natural fit for the anti-Catholic revolutionary arsenal of the cryptocracy; in fact, all the evidence suggests that freemasonry is a covert extension of Judaism—a sort of philo-Semitic religion with perhaps more aggressive methods than Judaism in destroying Christ’s influence on Earth. The Jesuit theorist will distort and twist history in all kinds of ways in a desperate attempt to fit their anti-Catholic, pro-Jewish worldview. It then becomes imperative for the reader to understand real history in order to see through the lies.

The Illuminati fallacy
When Adam Weishaupt founded the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria in 1776, it seems he intended to prevent the Jesuit order, which had at that point been suppressed by Pope Clement XIV, from regaining their former position in Europe.[x] Weishaupt was not a Jesuit himself; however, Jesuits educated him during his youth. Jesuit theorists focus only on this, while ignoring the more important manoeuvrings that were going on during the formation of Illuminist systems. Additionally, Weishaupt did not invent the concept of Illuminism, which was based on a perversion of the Catholic sacrament of confession.

“It wasn’t the goal of world domination, which, in the popular mind at the time, the Illuminati shared with the Jesuits that the public found as upsetting; it was the means whereby the Illuminati were going to achieve those goals. Weishaupt took the idea of examination of conscience and sacramental confession from the Jesuits and, after purging them of their religious elements, turned them into a system of intelligence gathering, spying, and informing, in which members were trained to spy on each other and inform their superiors.”[xi]

Jewish writer Bernard Lazare, an anti-Catholic, seems to brag about the Jewish orchestration of secret societies and the Illuminati:

“There were Jews around Weishaupt, and Martinez de Pasqualis, a Jew of Portuguese origin, organised numerous groups of Illuminati in France, recruiting many adepts to whom he taught the doctrine of reintegration. The lodges founded by Martinez were mystical, whilst the other orders of Freemasonry were rather rationalist. This permits one to say that the secret societies represented the two sides of the Jewish mind: practical rationalisation and pantheism.”[xii]

Some historians credit Martinez de Pasqualis with creating Illuminism, not Weishaupt.

The Illuminati wasn’t so much an organization as much as it was a concept of blackmail and espionage that was soon adopted by almost all secret societies, and it is still in use today. Talk about the Illuminati’s influence on society is sort of a red herring, especially in the way that it is used today. Modern conspiracy researchers portray the Illuminati as the end all, be all…as a highly organized institution, which it isn’t. It’s a concept or system. The Jesuit theorist obsession with Weishaupt, the Illuminati, and their supposed collaboration with the Jesuits shows their inclination to sensationalism rather than historical accuracy.

Notes

[i] Alex Jones supposedly a “Templar Jesuit” because he uses universal health symbol on his products – http://youtu.be/sm3GD70Tc1w?t=29s

[ii] NOTE OF CLARIFICATION FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF STATE – http://www.news.va/en/news/note-of-clarification-from-the-secretariat-of-stat

[iii] Dillon, Monsignor George F., Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked, Edinburgh (1884), Revised Edition (1950), pg. 10

[iv] Are the Knights of Malta Members of Freemasonry? http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/are-knights-of-malta-members-of_16.html

[v] Hermanns, Hubert, The Jesuit: The Obscurantist without a Homeland, 1933

[vi] Condit Jr., Jim, The Final Solution to Adolph Hitler https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSeZoedS83w

[vii] Ibid.

[viii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, The Jewish command to deceive Christians about Bible prophecy, May 29, 2014, The Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/05/29/the-jewish-command-to-mislead-christians-on-bible-prophecy/

[ix] Vennari, John, The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita: A Masonic Blueprint for the Subversion of the Catholic Church, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1999

[x] Jones, E. Michael, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, South Bend, Indiana, St. Augustine’s Press, 2000, pg. 8

[xi] Ibid. p. 13.

[xii] Lazare, Bernard, Anti-Semitism: It’s History and Causes, Paris (1884), pg. 127

Goy Guide to World History

By Doctor E. Michael Jones

Part I

Part II

 

 

Is Israel planning a false flag terror attack in Montreal?

Canadians Avert False Flag from Noworld Odour on Vimeo.

Alex Jones pulls the Goldman over the sheeple’s eyes

Alex Jones Goldman SachsBy Timothy Fitzpatrick
December 9, 2014 Anno Domini

Kosher Konspiracy King Alex Jones posted an unconvincing article on his website today claiming that an anonymous fan spent thousands (millions?) of dollars to advertize Jones and his Infwhores empire on the sides of American freeways.

Jones would have us believe that of his core of followers, which consists mostly of pot-smoking video gamers and conspiracy newbies who don’t know any better, one of these fans would have the kind of money to finance such an endeavour. Jones uses his cunning abilities when he writes,

If you’re the one putting up the billboards, please contact us so we can thank you personally.

Nice try, Jones, but we aren’t buying it.

The carefully crafted story likely serves two purposes. It creates the impression that his “Infowarriors” love him so much that they would fork over big bucks to plaster his face across the country. The story also frees Jones from having to answer why he would use establishment advertizing to spread his message of “truth”. This manoeuvre becomes even more imperative in light of the growing pile of evidence linking Jones to the New World Order establishment. If Stratfor, CIA, and Mossad weren’t bad enough, how much worse would it look if Jones were implicated with Goldman?

Goldman SachsJewish usurists Goldman Sachs the majority holder of shares in the Lamar Advertising Company
The notorious Goldman Sachs Group Inc., one of the key criminal organizations involved in the 2008 shakedown of the world’s gentiles, is the majority holder of institutional shares in Lamar as of today’s NASDAQ listing. Lamar’s other 282 institutional holders consist of the usual suspects. Suspected Infowars financier Koch Industries could also be a holder in Lamar through one ore more of its many offshoot companies.

Does it make sense for a Goldman company like Lamar to give a supposed establishment threat like Jones a means by which to thwart the very conspiracies Goldman itself is involved in? Even if it were true that Jones’ alleged Lamar financier were merely a fan of his, why would Lamar allow such promotion?

For more on the Alex Jones saga, read the following:

Alex Jones’ Jewish handler at Emmis promotes Hicks meme

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

Did the CIA recruit Alex Jones through the John Birch Society?

COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

The Stratfor Infowar – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

Alex Jones’ Jewish handler at Emmis promotes Hicks meme

Kosher Hicks-Jones meme

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Dec. 1, 2014 Anno Domini

Texas Monthly, the magazine that last week published an article hyping the conspiracy theory that Alex Jones is really deceased comedian Bill Hicks, is owned by Emmis Communications, which broadcasts the Alex Jones show through KLBJ.

In my article last week, I suggested that Alex Jones and his Zionist handlers were the ones behind this utterly ridiculous meme as a way of deflecting attention off of legitimate criticism of Alex Jones, namely that he is a Zionist gatekeeper, and to discredit Jones’ legitimate critics. Now, it looks more and more to be the case.

Emmis Communications CEO Jeffrey Smulyan

Emmis Communications CEO Jeffrey Smulyan

emmis communications logoTexas Monthly owned by same Zionist media racket that syndicates Infowars
Texas Monthly, based in the hometown of Alex Jones and Israeli Mossad front Stratfor, is owned by Emmis (“Emmis” is Hebrew for “truth) Communications, a media conglomerate which broadcasts Austin’s News Radio KLBJ. Alex Jones basically got his break on KLBJ in the 1990s and continues to syndicate The Alex Jones Show through it. Emmis is owned and operated by Jeffrey H. Smulyan, the winner of the Jewish National Fund’s Tree of Life Award. Smulyan is likely at least a sayan, which is a civilian helper of the Mossad who can help the organization circumvent obstacles to covert operations.

With Texas Monthly being part of the Emmis/Infowars empire, it is impossible that they would have published the Jones-Hicks story as a legitimate news story. It can only have been published to further perpetuate the meme, which is now circulating widely on the net by both paid shills and average people who have fallen for the meme as credible.

Emmis Communications tied to Stratfor and Koch Brothers
One of the major reasons for Jones to promote the Hicks meme is to cloud over the revelations about his Stratfor connections. And it just so happens that Emmis Communications also has ties with Stratfor. Wikileaks’ release of Stratfor emails shows Texas Monthly associate editor John Borders being invited for drinks with a Stratfor employee. In fact, Texas Monthly maintained regular contact with Stratfor, apparently in more than just a professional capacity. If you search the emails, you can see all kinds of exchanges.

Emmis Communications’ executive vice president and general counsel J. Scott Enright sits on the board of directors for the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, which appears to be one of many Koch Brothers-funded ultra capitalist lobbies. Smulyan chaired the Koch-funded 2001 Democratic Leadership Council in Indianapolis, Indiana, Smulyan’s hometown. Some believe Alex Jones is financed by the Koch Brothers. This isn’t far fetched when you consider that his theories on economics and social structures align perfectly with that put forward by the Kochs and their front groups. Jones is also openly a Tea Party/Libertarian movement supporter, which is a creation of the Kochs. Jones tries to pawn off the Koch’s predatory system as “free market,” but there is nothing free about it. It’s the same Judeo-usurist system of the exploitation of labour. Jones is quick to call out Leftwing gatekeeper George Soros, but whom does he call out on the Right? It’s mysteriously absent in his critique of the political spectrum. Could it be because it’s the Kochs, by whom he is financed?

Is Alex Jones behind the conspiracy theory that he is Bill Hicks?

Alex Jones Protocols Prediction

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
November 26, 2014 Anno Domini

Counter-intelligence operatives are sure a crazy bunch, but are they crazy enough to set up their own opposition as a means of managing their critics?

It appears that his may be exactly the case with Zionist/CIA counter-intelligence operative Alex Jones. The completely ridiculous, strawman argument that late comedian Bill Hicks changed his identity by having radical reconstructive plastic surgery in order to appear as the man we know today as Alex Emerick Jones is accomplishing two feats for Jones. Firstly, it makes all conspiracy theories about him look equally ridiculous. Secondly, it obfuscates the growing awareness about Jones and his ties to Israeli and American intelligence.

Screen shot 2014-11-26 at 3.59.29 PMIf Jones didn’t create this absurd strawman himself, he is currently using it to its maximum benefit as part of a memetic warfare strategy against his growing number of critics. Today, Jones went so far as to post the Hicks theory on the front page of Infowars and spent a considerable portion of his show playing up the theory and laughing at the proponents of it. One caller to the Infowars show today even admitted, along with Jones, that the Hicks strawman is bringing Jones more attention and followers. Jones goes out of his way to bring up the Hicks meme whilst simultaneously bashing his anti-Zionist detractors or the white nationalist crowd (he doesn’t differentiate between neo-Nazis and anti-Zionists). This has the effect of tarnishing a legitimate conspiracy about Jones—that he is a Zionist provocateur. Jones’ co-conspirators in the Jewish-controlled mainstream media are helping spread the Hicks meme, with an article in Texas Monthly, of late. Check out this these clips of Jones talking about the Hicks meme. Notice that he is smiling all throughout his discussion of it. This does not look like a man that is being harmed by the Hicks meme at all.

Jones claims the Hicks meme has been around for about five years, but research shows that it has only really been circulated on the net since sometime 2012-2013—conveniently when the Stratfor leak was gaining prominence. One particular keeps popping up among its seemingly numerous proponents: an internet personality using the moniker “caliberhitter”. CaliberHitter, whose real name appears to be Felix Pantaleon, may have worked for Infowars or may still. His girlfriend goes by the name of Sherrie Lea Laird. You may remember her as one of the whistleblowers of former Infowars editor Molly Maroney, who worked for Israeli intelligence front Stratfor and the CIA’s Parker Media. Apparently, the way Laird discovered this was after Maroney had been communicating with her via email regarding having Hollywood gossiper Tile Tequila on the show. Tequila was nixed from her scheduled appearance on the show, upsetting Laird, who felt Tequila had much to reveal about the Illuminati in Hollywood. In the fallout, Tequila threatened to expose the dirt she claimed to have on Alex Jones, but she never did disclose this and has more or less disappeared from public life. This is when Laird started looking into Maroney’s past and discovered her previous history with Stratfor and Parker Media. It appears that Laird was some kind of informant or tipster for Infowars. Whether she was paid or not is unknown. But it’s likely that this CaliberHitter character was also working with Infowars in some capacity alongside Laird. Laird, after she discovered Maroney’s Stratfor history, was quick to connect Stratfor with Israel, calling Jones an Israelian (sic) and Jew. But she has since entertained the Hicks meme.

Interestingly, Laird was not the first to make the Stratfor connections with Jones. Independent journalist David Chase Taylor was the first. Was Jones using Laird to bury the Stratfor connection that Taylor had made? Who knows, but Laird’s discovery of Maroney and Stratfor went viral and was even picked up by FBI informant Pete Santilli, who milked the revelation for everything it was worth on his radio show, which seemed to become prominent over night.

The timeline looks something like this:

 

CaliberHitter

CaliberHitter

As possible Infowars operatives, Laird and Caliberhitter may have gone rogue and are now just muddying the water with their insane theories. Laird is so crazy, she believes she is the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe and received mainstream media attention for this belief when her quack Jewish “doctor” supported her claim. Caliberhitter appears to be a ghetto thug wannabe and likely the driving force behind the Hicks meme. He may have even created the meme, as several of his ridiculous theories involve the same pattern of celebrities faking their death and assuming new or used identities. Hitter calls them “Hollywood death fakers”. He also just happens to promote the Jesuit conspiracy meme, which leads into another strawman meme against Jones: that he is a secret Jesuit agent. Here is a list of some of CaliberHitter’s theories bearing close resemblance to the Hicks meme:

Fitzpatrick Informer readers will remember that “Mack Quigley”, as revealed in a recent article, is an admitted Zionist and promoter of the Hicks meme. However, Quigley may just be a sock puppet of CaliberHitter.

It’s disturbing that Jones would go to such lengths to protect his status, but it’s equally disturbing that there appears to be some who sincerely believe in the Hicks meme. Sincere or not, they zealously promote this theory to no end. It seems they are working around the clock to promote it all over the web. And almost all of them seem to also endorse the Jesuit meme, which as I pointed out, leads to the other strawman meme against Jones. The proof of the insincerity of the promoters of the Hicks meme lies in the fact that they only promote the Hicks critique of Jones rather than the well established, credible, and numerous critiques like that of Jones’ many Zionist and intelligence connections. They ignore this despite their plea that they are interested in the truth about Jones’ identity. The source of this Hicks disinformation is likely coming from one place. It is helping Alex Jones protect his true identity, which is that he is a Zionist gatekeeper misdirecting the “truth” movement.

For more on the Alex Jones saga, read the following:

Alex Jones’ Jewish handler at Emmis promotes Hicks meme

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

Did the CIA recruit Alex Jones through the John Birch Society?

COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

The Stratfor Infowar – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

Did the CIA recruit Alex Jones through the John Birch Society?

Timothy FitzpatrickJonesy Birch Society
October 26, 2014 Anno Domini

With Alex Jones’ allegiance now clearly belonging to the Zionist-occupied United States intelligence community and not to the patriot community, it’s interesting to speculate at which point and how he was recruited to the CIA and what drew him to an organization that would eventually lead him to committing treason against the American people.

Jones officially started his CIA Operation Mockingbird, FBI COINTELPRO operation (the two programs work in tandem as part of the U.S. government), Infowars, in Austin, Texas in 1996, the same year Israeli intelligence established it’s front Stratfor, also in Austin, Texas.

But it’s unlikely that Jones was recruited to the CIA that same year, as counter intelligence operatives require extensive training and programming before they become active field agents or assets.

Is he CIA…or is he a Zionist shill? Make up your mind!

I should point out at this point that Jones’ shilling for the Jewish lobby appears to be via the CIA, not the other way around. Keep in mind that the CIA is subservient to Israel and its intelligence apparatus. There are many blogs and videos claiming that Jones is only CIA. This is only half of the truth. One should imagine the CIA as a paid contractor of the Israeli Mossad. CIA operatives then work for the State of Israel with the façade of being American and loyal to America’s interests. To answer the question of exactly what kind of shill Alex Jones is, the answer then is that he is both a Zionist and CIA shill, with the CIA likely being his paymaster. Of course, one, some, or all of his dozens of Jewish advertizers[1] on his Infowars program could be tied to Israeli intelligence and/or the CIA as well, so they would also be financing the Infowars COINTELPRO operation, but indirectly. Jones claims he has invested over $70 million into the Infowars empire. I guess he doesn’t expect his gullible followers to question whether a supposed grassroots radio host could come up with this kind of capital.

Jones’ early life

As is typical with most intelligence operatives, little is known about Alex Jones’ childhood and the years leading up to 1996. His Wikipedia entry for his early life is only a paragraph long. He claims to have been born in Dallas, Texas in 1974, after which point he appears to have been moved around quite a bit with his parents, culminating in a stint at Austin Community College, before he would go on to become the popular radio host he is today. He claims to have become familiar with conspiracies at a young age, being influenced by his father, a dentist and member of the John Birch Society (JBS), who retained books like None Dare Call it Conspiracy in his library. This book was published by the society and is basically required reading for Birchers. How true the following admission by Jones in Jewish-owned Rolling Stone magazine[2] is remains unclear, but perhaps we can glean some understanding of his upbringing.

“My parents were careful not to give me political views almost as an experiment to see what I’d turn into,” he says. “The closest thing to a childhood political training was some neighbors who were members of the John Birch Society. They’d come over for dinner and I’d be exposed to those ideas, starting at around age two.”[3]

The most enduring influence, though, was a 1971 bestseller he found on his father’s bookshelf: None Dare Call It Conspiracy. Authored by Gary Allen, a spokesman for the John Birch Society, the book provided the cornerstone for New World Order conspiracies. According to None Dare, the federal income tax is nothing but a plot by a cabal of mega rich “insiders” who work to suck the middle class dry and transfer its wealth to the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. As a teenager, Jones read the book twice. “It’s still the easiest-to-read primer to the New World Order,” he says.

Jones claims that his affinity to conspiracies was rooted in his experience with corrupt Rockwall cops, who once arrested him while driving without a license and in possession of a six-pack of beer. Oddly, this incident supposedly provoked his father to move his family and his dental practice to Austin, Texas.

“They brought me to jail,” Jones says. “Afterward, one of the cops told me to wise up, or they’d frame me and send me away.” The following week, his father was so spooked that he sold his dental practice and moved the family to Austin. A few months later, Rockwall County’s sheriff was indicted on organized-crime charges.

“The Rockwall cops were lowbrow thugs, and Alex was a hell-raiser,” says Buckley Hamman, a cousin who grew up with Jones. “The conflict with the cops started Alex down the road of his current pursuit.”

Jones apparently began to fall under the influence of Judeo-Masonic Enlightenment thinkers like Edward Gibbon, whose books may have been available to Jones through his father’s library or perhaps through the family’s Bircher friends. Jones’ Enlightenment influence is consistent with his current unwavering support of the Masonic U.S. Constitution (and Ron Paul) and the overwhelmingly Masonic U.S. Founding Fathers. Jones is the quintessential WASP elitist. Of course, the JBS is a strong advocate of Judeo-Masonic republicanism, Ron Paul, the Masonic U.S. Constitution, and so-called free-market capitalism.

Alex Jones’ early message centered on Birch themes involving the United Nations, CFR, and the Federal Reserve

USOutOfUNAfter establishing himself on radio and with his website, Jones consistently spread New World Order conspiracy theories centered around a unified plot carried out by the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the U.S. Federal Reserve. This line is straight from the rhetoric put out by the JBS. One notable instance of Jones parroting the JBS line was during a public speech given by then-Texas governor George W. Bush.[4] Jones interrupted the soon-to-be U.S. President and accused him of being in league with the Federal Reserve and the CFR. In what could well have been a staged incident, authorities then handcuffed Jones before the cameras stopped rolling. Of course, he was eventually let go, presumably without incident. On his radio program, Jones constantly ranted and raved about the United Nations takeover of America, a specifically JBS theme. The JBS states that one of its “most immediate objectives…is to get the United States out of the United Nations and the United Nations out of the United States.” It even produced a documentary, The UN Deception, in 2001[5]. An old video from the 1990s surfaced on Youtube within the last few years showing Alex Jones fingering the UN as being part of a plot to oppress Jews in Israel.[6] Most interestingly, Jones confesses to supporting the state of Israel, in defiance of the UN, despite the fact that the UN helped Israel become the illegal state it is today. It’s difficult to accept the Birch Society’s anti-Federal Reserve claims when one of its founding members, William J. Grede, served as director of the Federal Reserve Bank’s Seventh District from 1947 to 1961.[7] Grede also served several years on the UN-connected Rockefeller national council for the YMCA.[8] The Birch Society, nor Alex Jones, never attacks the core problem at the heart of the Federal Reserve, which is usury, carried out by a cabal of exclusively Jewish international banksters. The JBS’s hypocrisy is almost the same with the CFR. Early Birch Society member Spruille Braden, an American diplomat, was a member of the CFR. Braden was a paid lobbyist for the United Fruit Company, which was used by the CIA to force regime change in Nicaragua in 1954.[9] That Bircher Thomas Coleman Andrews was commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the 1950s doesn’t help the Society’s credibility that it is truly anti-tax either.[10] Jones is also outspokenly anti-tax and pro free-market capitalism. The seemingly anti-communist JBS also never attacks the driving force behind communism, which is clearly the Jewish revolutionary movement. Other JBS rhetoric often rehashed by Jones includes the notion of fluoridated water as a plot to make us all docile. In my observations of Jones, when he is under criticism, instead of addressing the points, he will automatically fall back on his foundational JBS rhetoric, including the fluoride and vaccine conspiracies. Older readers may remember that the JBS was strongly anti-JFK during the former President’s short term in office. The JBS was remembered for distributing close to 5,000 flyers accusing JFK of committing treason while serving as President, in the days leading up to the assassination. Jones has gone out of his way to suppress the Israeli Mossad orchestration of this crime.[11] Of course, the Society and Jones have not been so anti-JFK in recent years, as it has become more obvious that there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, and to say otherwise would tarnish their image as being anti-conspiracy.

TreasonFlyer.jpg.CROP.original-original

A Birch Society hit piece on JFK, while the President waged a secret war against Israel and Jewish mob king Meyer Lansky.

The John Birch Society as a Judeo-Masonic-CIA front

JBS, like CIA front National Review, was established in 1958, at the height of the CIA’s psychological warfare research and development phase and during the CIA’s creation of its Operation Mockingbird program, which would pave the way for the CIA to use the media for covert domestic and international psychological warfare. John Birch himself worked for U.S. intelligence through the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). And like National Review, which was dominated by Jews at the top[12], it appears the JBS’ function is to homogenize the conservative movement and, eventually, the conspiracy community, into one manageable controlled opponent.[13]

Conspiracy researcher Eustace Mullins wrote in his 1988 book Murder By Injection that the JBS was created by the WASP elitist Rockefeller family as controlled opposition to the conspiracy it purportedly was set up to resist.

The Rockefellers were also active on the ‘right wing’ front through their sponsorship of the John Birch Society. To enable Robert Welch, a 32nd degree Mason, to devote all of his time to the Society, Nelson Rockefeller purchased his family firm, the Welch Candy Company, from him at a handsome price. Welch chose the principal officers of the Society from his acquaintances at the Council on Foreign Relations. For years afterwards, American patriots were puzzled by the consistent inability of the John Birch Society to move forward on any of its well-advertised ‘anti-Communist’ goals. The fact that the Society had been set up at the behest of the backers of the world Communist revolution may have played some role in this development. Other patriots wondered why most American conservative writers, including the present writer, were steadily blacklisted by the Society for some thirty years. Despite thousands of requests from would-be book buyers, the Society refused to review or list any of my books. After several decades of futility, the Society was totally discredited by its own record.[14]

B'nai Birch Society

Similarly, many of Jones’ critics reach the same conclusion that Mullins reaches about JBS—Jones’ inability to move forward on any of his purported goals of thwarting the New World Order conspiracy. Whether or not the Rockefeller dynasty is Jewish, they have worked hand in hand with the Jewish money power and the Zionist revolutionary movement. Late Zionist researcher John “Birdman” Bryant brought to the conspiracy community’s attention disturbing revelations from a book by late disillusioned Bircher founder Professor Revilo P. Oliver, which implicates what he calls the “B’nai Birch[15]” with Jews and the CIA-controlled right. Bryant writes,

Revilo_p_oliver

Professor Revilo P. Oliver

In 1966, Prof Revilo Oliver (now deceased), who was co-founder (with eleven others) of the Birch Society and Associate Editor of its major organ, American Opinion, discovered that Robert Welch, the JBS’s principal founder, was controlled by Jews, the purpose of said control being to harmlessly absorb and deflect the energy and money of patriotic Americans who wished to fight the ‘international communist conspiracy’, while leaving unmolested the Jewish-led conspiracy against America and Western civilization. In 1981 Oliver published America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, in which he told the story of his discovery.[16]

I myself and many of Alex Jones’ critics have leveled the same charge against Alex Jones as Professor Oliver levels against Welch and JBS.

Oliver writes,

I was not astonished, although I was pained, by the discovery that Welch was merely the nominal head of the Birch business, which he operated under the supervision of a committee of Jews, while Jews also controlled the flow, through various bank accounts, of the funds that were needed to supplement the money that was extracted from the Society’s members by artfully passionate exhortations to “fight the Communists.”[17]

The money generated from Alex Jones’ supporters could be said to be working in the very same way against their own interests. Oliver makes another prophetic, parallel Jones-JBS critique,

…I note that Welch, perhaps on instructions, no longer has much to say about the “Communist Conspiracy,” and, after flirting with the notion of reactivating Weishaupt’s diabolic llluminati, seems to have settled on the conveniently nameless and raceless “Insiders” as the architects of all evil, inspired by an unexplained malevolence.

This describes Jones’ carefully crafted explanation of the world conspiracy as being merely the work of “globalists”, “the elite”, “Luciferians”, etc.

Oliver goes on describing the direct Jewish involvement in editorial policy,

…the Society still publishes American Opinion and the Review of the News, for which very competent journalists are hired to write under Jewish supervision, and both periodicals contain some authentic information that is not found in the New York Times, since they are censored for distribution to a different audience.[18]

Today, JBS publishes The New American.

v17n6p26_JBSProving Oliver correct, on Sept. 13, 2011, JBS published an article by the Jewish Sam Blumenfeld endorsing the official kosher story of the 9/11 WTC attack.[19] Birch writer John Rees is alleged to be an “Israeli intelligence agent.”[20] Rees also allegedly provides intelligence to the CIA, FBI, and NSA.[21] JBS has also propagated the Holocaust dogma of Judaism.[22]

Oliver, again, details then what is now echoed about Jones as controlled opposition,

After my resignation, many individuals urged me to “expose” the Welcher, but almost all of them had already perceived that the Society had become a Jewish auxiliary, primarily used to keep the goyim confused and docile and to frustrate patriotic movements that had any potentiality of effectiveness.[23]

The JBS never addressed Oliver’s accusations but, instead, Welch and the society went on a public smear campaign against Oliver. Likewise, when confronted, Alex Jones never addresses his many Jewish and intelligence connections but ends up smearing the questioner or diverting the discussion.

Roy Cohn

Roy Cohn

Jewish Bircher Roy Cohn was reportedly the principle figure in the private intelligence dissemination network Western Goals Foundation (WGF), which appears to have been closely associated with JBS. Groups like JBS and the WGF allowed intelligence gathering to continue unabated in the fallout from the restrictive legislation that followed the 1970s COINTELPRO scandal. Using private interests allowed the intelligence apparatus to carry on without government interference.

Some have speculated that Alex Jones is financed by the Koch Brothers, who are members of JBS.

Jones advances the B’nai Birch legacy as part of CIA/FBI COINTELPRO

Jones’ 100 percent certified kosher conspiracy message has been consistent throughout the 18 years he has been active as a counter-intelligence operative, and it has been specifically Birch in nature. Even today, he overtly promotes JBS, even urging his listeners to join.[24] In Apri, 2006, Jones told current JBS CEO John McManus,

I want to work with you guys, to see you grow.

To which McManus replied,

…looking forward to seeing the relationship continue.

Jones even let follow Austinite and Bircher Bob Dacy fill in for him to carry out hosting duties of the Alex Jones show.

But as the JBS has somewhat faded today, Alex Jones has risen to popularity to carry on its legacy. It appears Jones was knowingly recruited by the CIA at some point during his John Birch-influenced upbringing. Along the way, he has been guided by the “Jewish supervisors” former Birch founder Oliver revealed directs the society—Stratfor in Austin, Texas being one such supervisor. Like National Review and like the JBS, Jones’ objective is to misdirect dissent to the New World Order conspiracy by homogenizing dissidents into a monolithic group that can be more easily directed by the conspirators. It’s interesting that Jones uses the word “experiment” when talking about his parents raising him. Could it be that his parents were somehow involved in the CIA or one its fronts? Jones Jr. then, was being groomed for work as a field agent from a very young age, which is not uncommon in the CIA.

Notes

[1] Alex Jones and Jewish Sponsors http://alexjonesexposed.info/alex-jones-and-jewish-sponsors/

[2] Wenner Media LLC – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jann_Wenner

[3] Meet Alex Jones, Rolling Stone, March 2, 2011 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/talk-radios-alex-jones-the-most-paranoid-man-in-america-20110302

[4] Alex Jones Confronts George Bush http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NhmZSdmY0s

[5] The UN Deception https://www.jbs.org/shop-tna/the-un-deception

[6] Alex Jones Supports Israel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNseMDToKdk

[7] William J. Grede Is Dead at 92; Joined in Founding Birch Society, New York Times, June 7, 1989 http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/07/obituaries/william-j-grede-is-dead-at-92-joined-in-founding-birch-society.html

[8] Ibid.

[9] 1954 Guatemalan coup d’état http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27état

[10] T. Coleman Andrews http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._Coleman_Andrews

[11] Michael Collins Piper Responds to Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, and Robert Groden on JFK/Israel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB6LyCjEjNM

[12] Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/parallels-between-alex-jones-and-cia-front-national-review/

[13] Ibid.

[14] Eustace Mullins, Murder By Injection, Staunton VA: National Council for Medical Research, 1988: 340-1

[15] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 425

[16] The John Birch Society — Exposed!, John Bryant http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-Oliver.html

[17] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 421

[18] Ibid, p. 425

[19] Blumfeld, Sam, The Meaning of 9/11, http://www.jbs.org/the-john-birch-society/the-meaning-of-9-11

[20] Is the Birch Society a Zionist Front? http://www.dcdave.com/article4/050308.htm

[21] Interhemispheric Resource Center, GroupWatch, Western Goals Foundation, References: 5. Letter from Sean Steinbach and Dominik Diehl, May 22, 1987. 8. Elton Manzione, “The Private Spy Agency,” The National Reporter (Summer 1985).

[22] John Birch Society Magazine Takes Aim at Holocaust Revisionism and the IHR http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n6p26_JBS.html

[23] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 425-26

[24] Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoaIFtr6E5E

For more on the Alex Jones saga, read the following:

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

The Stratfor Infowar – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

 

Shooting at Parliament Hill in Canada an Israeli false flag?

verBy Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 22, 2014

The timing of an alleged terrorist attack at Canadian Parliament today just happens to coincide with Canada’s recent deployment of troops to fight ISIS in the Middle East and the mainstream media’s escalation in fear mongering of the Zionist-CIA backed ISIS threat worldwide.

It also follows a recent incident where a Canadian soldier was allegedly run over by a Muslims radical in Montreal, an event which prompted Canada to raise its terror alert threat. Of course, the Zionist-owned Canadian press was quick to label this a terrorist attack.

Canadian soldier Nathan Cirillo was allegedly shot by Michael Nehaf-Bibeau while guarding a war memorial at the House of Commons in Ottawa Wednesday morning. The cause of the shooting has not been revealed by authorities. But what we do know is that Israeli intelligence has a heavy presence in Canada and could very well have orchestrated this incident in order to further the Zionist agenda to perpetuate the ISIS (Islamic State) threat and to provide a pretext for a martial law crackdown under the watch of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who is an admitted fanatical Zionist and was recently nominated by powerful Jewish secret society B’nai Brith for a Nobel peace prize, despite being a war monger. Israel has a long history of staging false flag terror attacks, which are incidents that appear to be perpetrated by someone other than who actually perpetrated them. This shooting will most likely be pinned on Nehaf-Bibeau as a Muslim radical as part of the false flag narrative; if not, the Canadian public will correlate the shooting with the recent running over of a Canadian soldier by a Muslim. Either way, ISIS is implicated. Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) are also no strangers to false flag terrorism. For example, on August 20, 2007, Canadian police staged a false flag in Montebello, Quebec, where RCMP agent provocateurs posed as protestors to agitate a rally. Canada’s RCMP and intelligence apparatus CSIS have a close working relationship with Israeli intelligence.

Security at Parliament Hill

Because false flag terror attacks often involve the complicity of on-the-ground security companies, it is important to investigate who was running security at the time of the shooting. Security at Parliament Hill is run by House of Commons Security Services. It is uncertain whether these services are contracted out to a third party. The government website states the following about its security services:

House of Commons Security Services preserve a delicate balance between protecting Parliamentarians and the functions of Parliament, and respecting the right of Canadians to have access to the Precinct and their legislators.

But with the current government trend to outsource services and with Canada’s fawning over perceived Israeli superiority, there is a chance that Israel is involved at some level.

Israeli security firm Verint prevalent in Canada

There is good reason to suspect that Israeli intelligence is involved with the House of Commons Security Services. Canada has an ever-growing alliance with the state of Israel, and Israeli intelligence is becoming the standard go-to guys for “training” police services and intelligence agencies around the world in counter-terrorism (see The Israelification of domestic security). After all, they claim, who has had more experience than the Israelis with terrorism? If you want the best training, you must go to the Israelis. According to PressTV, in its article Canada’s slavish obedience to US, Israel,

 Israel security agents now officially assist Canada’s security services, the RCMP and CSIS, in profiling Canadians citizens who are Muslims and monitoring individuals and/or organizations in Canada involved in supporting the rights of Palestinians and other such nefarious activities. Even the usually timid UN is appalled.

More recently, it was revealed that the police chief that oversaw the Ferguson debacle in Missouri learned “anti-terror” tactics through the Zionist Anti-Defamation League in Israel.

Canada’s belief in Israel’s counter-terrorism expertise is so strong that the country has entrusted much of its vital infrastructure to the Israelis. Most of Canada’s airports and transit systems are run by Israel’s Verint Systems Inc., a suspected front or, at the very least, a sayan for Israel’s brutal Mossad. That a foreign nation, especially one with a long history of false flag terror attacks, can run security for Canadian airports and transit systems is a national security threat in itself. This act of treason by the government to allow foreign control over Canada’s security systems was enough to wake up a small group of concerned citizens in Montreal, who demanded answers from Montreal city council as to why Israel’s Verint was allowed a contract to handle security of Montreal’s Metro transit system. The following is a documentary created by a member of the Canadian Action Party regarding Israel, Verint, and security on Montreal’s Metro:

Verint responsible for security at 9/11 airpots and at London’s Underground during 7/7 bombings

The Israeli’s expertise wasn’t good enough to thwart the large-scale terror attacks of 9/11 at the 7/7 bombings in London. How it is that a few supposed lone nuts directed from caves in Afghanistan could penetrate the strong security apparatus in the U.S. and England is beyond logic. It just smells like more false flag terrorism, perpetuated by a desperate villain looking to demonize and control their opposition. There are Israeli fingerprints all over the 9/11 attacks. What Israel has to gain by staging false flag terror attacks framing Muslims is numerous. Most importantly, it gives them the pretext to use their military might—the U.S. Military and their owned U.S. taxpayer-backed Israeli Defense Forces—to bomb any one of its oil-rich Arab neighbours into submission and expand its sphere of control over the region. This control further secures the United States’ numerous  Middle Eastern construction contracts and Arab puppet regimes.

ISIS is nothing more than an Israeli-CIA backed revolutionary group

cia_agent_badge-abu_bakr_al_baghdadi_aka_ali_baba_hq_langley_virginiaIsrael has gone on the record stating that ISIS—whose leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was trained by Mossad— is good for Israel’s interest. A Syrian envoy has accused Israel of being allied with ISIL. The ISIS threat is also good for the United States’ interest in snuffing out the Assad regime in Syria and securing oil futures not only for the US, but also for Israel (Golan Heights and Mediterranean sea next to Gaza). ISIS is purported to be the successor to Al Qaeda, whose public shelf life has apparently run out. This public relations rebranding of the so called Islamic global threat (ISIS/ISIL) is actually the creation of a French Jew named Bernard-Henri Lév. It appears that Israel may even have gone as far as faking the ISIS/ISIL beheadings in order to reinforce the perceived threat. Former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky, a Canadian Jew, exposed in the 1990s how Israel manages and uses the supposed Islamic threat,

Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.

—Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception – pg. 197

Whether or not Nehaf-Bibeau is truly the lone nut acting on behalf of the Islamic state that the mainstream media is portraying or if he is some kind of Manchurian candidate being used as part of a false flag attack, Prime Minister Harper is using this event to show the public how justified he was in sending troops to fight ISIS.

Uptalk is not just speech pathology; it’s covert social engineering

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 16, 2014 Anno Domini

An adaptation of modern artist Marcel Duschamp's urinal. Along with the organized attack on classical art there is an organized attack on classic speech.

An adaptation of modern artist Marcel Duschamp’s disgusting urinal. Along with the organized attack on classical art, there is an organized attack on classical speech. Uptalk appears to be a weapon in the social engineer’s arsenal.

Uptalk—the form of speech generally perceived as emanating from the vocal chords of young, diffident girls, where the voice rises toward the end of a declarative statement—has crept into Western speech habits as a covert saboteur of logic-based thinking.

Uptalk, also known as “valley girl” speech (from California), upspeak, rising inflection, or high rising terminal (HRT), has become so common among English speakers that most are not even aware of why or when they do it. It’s that highly irritative sound you hear in declarative statements that are not meant to be stated in the form of a question but are. An example using a hypothetical interview with an eyewitness to a crime on a newscast would go something like this:

“We were, like, walking down the street (?)… when we heard this loud crashing sound (?)… and there was, like, blood everywhere (?)….

Unfortunately, young girls typically do not grow out of this speech pathology and, what’s worse, they tend infect everyone within their social sphere, even their parents, and even grown men.

Linguists tend to view this speech pathology as indicative of insecurity in the speaker, who subconsciously raises their intonation in order to seek approval of their unsure “declaration”. It is argued that women are more susceptible to this speech pathology, as they tend to be less aggressive in their speech habits.

Believe it or not, there are actually people who defend this pathology and call it the progressive evolution of speech. Uptalk, they argue, indicates empathy in the speaker and creates a more comfortable and relaxed speech environment. This, despite the fact that healthy and confident English speakers can be as empathetic as anyone and can be as easy to talk to as one’s best friend. And there is nothing inherently feminine about uptalk. Truly feminine speech should be pleasant and elegant. Even those unable to clinically recognize uptalk as speech pathology know that there is just something about it that is irritating and unpleasant. Uptalk is ugly. It not only makes the uptalker unattractive, it also makes them sound less unique, since it is so ubiquitous.

Another speech pathology that is commonly associated with uptalkers is the use of the submodifier/conjunction “so” at the beginning of a response to a direct question. One can often hear professionals, experts, even doctors, using this annoying little speech impediment in interviews, especially on shows on National Public Radio (NPR). Like uptalk, this error is believed to have originated in the Silicon Valley tech sector. It appears the use of “so” at the beginning of a response to a direct question indicates a belief of superiority of the speaker. Linguists see it as indicating that the interviewee believes he is superior to the interviewer, and thus uses “so” to detach himself from having to answer directly to the question. Instead of responding with “yes” or “no” and continuing to explain why, the interviewee will begin with “so” (detachment) and go on a bit of a diatribe before eventually getting around to answering the question. These speakers also tend to use “so” frequently, almost in response to every single question in a series, and even at the beginning of fresh, declarative sentences.

The above examples of speech pathology are by no means the only diseases plaguing the great English language and its speakers. There are many. One need only look at the prevalent form of communication today by subcultures (ghettoized Africna Americans), for example, or those communicating by the plethora of mobile techno junk to know how much real, effective, and beautiful communication has deteriorated. But uptalk has a dastardly unique characteristic to it. It appears to be re-engineering how we think.

The source of uptalk is uncertain. It is claimed to have originated everywhere from Silicon Valley tech executives to Australians and seemingly timid Canadians, though, it is certain that it is not very old. It seems to have emerged right alongside the counter-culture revolution that began in the 1950s and ‘60s in the English-speaking world. The diffident nature of uptalk pseudo-statements seems to reveal that the speaker is unsure of basic facts and logic and therefore is caught up in some kind of subjectivist underworld of the dead. Columnist Hank Davis writes, in The Uptalk Epidemic,

“It’s a nasty habit. It is the very opposite of confidence or assertiveness. It’s gotten all out of control. These days, even statements about which there should be no question or doubt are presented in this tentative, timid and deferential manner. Here’s an example. I teach a 4th year university course in which part of the requirement is a seminar presentation. Students used to stand up and share the results of their research in a way that conveyed their confidence and knowledge. They no longer do. Even if they do feel confident, their culture now mandates that they dial it back and sound like this:

My name is Jennifer? My seminar today is on bystander apathy? There is quite a bit of research on this topic?”

Davis continues,

“Why all the questions, Jennifer? Just what is at issue here? Are you not sure of your name? Are you willing to change it if we don’t nod our approval? Why are you unsure of your seminar topic? Does that, too, require our approval?… I think we have an answer to that question. Making a declarative statement is no longer OK. It is not socially acceptable for a 21 year old woman to stand before an audience and tell us her name or what she knows without turning into a shy little girl whose statements are questions or pleas for consensus.”

The speech trend of uptalk is a social engineer’s dream come true. Instead of the brutish, laborious method of forcing a subject to accept a particular ideology, simply get the subject to believe this ideology was arrived at on his own by getting him to think and talk in subjectivist form. After all, how can anything be for certain when one cannot simply state anything with certainty? Now the subject is ripe for social engineering by elites who know for certain in which direction they want to guide us.

2012-11-24cogitduck022

So it follows that uptalk has arrived on the scene simultaneously with the surge of socially engineered public education, particularly that advanced by the United Nations Agenda 21, Common Core initiative. Common Core re-education is fairly obvious collectivist, secular humanist propaganda, designed to rip out from the minds of the youth any concept of God, country, family, or any shred of high scholastic logic (in Common Core mathematics, for example, 2+2 does not necessarily equal 4, they claim). Are social engineers also attempting to emasculate men with uptalk or is this all merely “progressivism”? It’s more common to encounter women who are unsure of themselves than men. Men are natural leaders, and even when they are unsure of themselves, they tend to behave and speak as if they are. For men, real men, uptalk is a direct path to emasculation—and with it, patriarchal Christian mores. For women, uptalk instills in them a false sense of feminine speech. For both sexes, uptalk is anti-logic, counter intuitive, and rewires their brains to think in subjectivist terms.

The phenomenon of uptalk may not be the direct work of social engineers, but it certainly appears to be the devil child of the counter-culture revolution of the 1960s and beyond, perhaps stretching back to the anti-classicism of the Enlightenment saboteurs.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 166 other followers