Shooting at Parliament Hill in Canada an Israeli false flag?

verBy Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 22, 2014

The timing of an alleged terrorist attack at Canadian Parliament today just happens to coincide with Canada’s recent deployment of troops to fight ISIS in the Middle East and the mainstream media’s escalation in fear mongering of the Zionist-CIA backed ISIS threat worldwide.

It also follows a recent incident where a Canadian soldier was allegedly run over by a Muslims radical in Montreal, an event which prompted Canada to raise its terror alert threat. Of course, the Zionist-owned Canadian press was quick to label this a terrorist attack.

Canadian soldier Nathan Cirillo was allegedly shot by Michael Nehaf-Bibeau while guarding a war memorial at the House of Commons in Ottawa Wednesday morning. The cause of the shooting has not been revealed by authorities. But what we do know is that Israeli intelligence has a heavy presence in Canada and could very well have orchestrated this incident in order to further the Zionist agenda to perpetuate the ISIS (Islamic State) threat and to provide a pretext for a martial law crackdown under the watch of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who is an admitted fanatical Zionist and was recently nominated by powerful Jewish secret society B’nai Brith for a Nobel peace prize, despite being a war monger. Israel has a long history of staging false flag terror attacks, which are incidents that appear to be perpetrated by someone other than who actually perpetrated them. This shooting will most likely be pinned on Nehaf-Bibeau as a Muslim radical as part of the false flag narrative; if not, the Canadian public will correlate the shooting with the recent running over of a Canadian soldier by a Muslim. Either way, ISIS is implicated. Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) are also no strangers to false flag terrorism. For example, on August 20, 2007, Canadian police staged a false flag in Montebello, Quebec, where RCMP agent provocateurs posed as protestors to agitate a rally. Canada’s RCMP and intelligence apparatus CSIS have a close working relationship with Israeli intelligence.

Security at Parliament Hill

Because false flag terror attacks often involve the complicity of on-the-ground security companies, it is important to investigate who was running security at the time of the shooting. Security at Parliament Hill is run by House of Commons Security Services. It is uncertain whether these services are contracted out to a third party. The government website states the following about its security services:

House of Commons Security Services preserve a delicate balance between protecting Parliamentarians and the functions of Parliament, and respecting the right of Canadians to have access to the Precinct and their legislators.

But with the current government trend to outsource services and with Canada’s fawning over perceived Israeli superiority, there is a chance that Israel is involved at some level.

Israeli security firm Verint prevalent in Canada

There is good reason to suspect that Israeli intelligence is involved with the House of Commons Security Services. Canada has an ever-growing alliance with the state of Israel, and Israeli intelligence is becoming the standard go-to guys for “training” police services and intelligence agencies around the world in counter-terrorism (see The Israelification of domestic security). After all, they claim, who has had more experience than the Israelis with terrorism? If you want the best training, you must go to the Israelis. According to PressTV, in its article Canada’s slavish obedience to US, Israel,

 Israel security agents now officially assist Canada’s security services, the RCMP and CSIS, in profiling Canadians citizens who are Muslims and monitoring individuals and/or organizations in Canada involved in supporting the rights of Palestinians and other such nefarious activities. Even the usually timid UN is appalled.

More recently, it was revealed that the police chief that oversaw the Ferguson debacle in Missouri learned “anti-terror” tactics through the Zionist Anti-Defamation League in Israel.

Canada’s belief in Israel’s counter-terrorism expertise is so strong that the country has entrusted much of its vital infrastructure to the Israelis. Most of Canada’s airports and transit systems are run by Israel’s Verint Systems Inc., a suspected front or, at the very least, a sayan for Israel’s brutal Mossad. That a foreign nation, especially one with a long history of false flag terror attacks, can run security for Canadian airports and transit systems is a national security threat in itself. This act of treason by the government to allow foreign control over Canada’s security systems was enough to wake up a small group of concerned citizens in Montreal, who demanded answers from Montreal city council as to why Israel’s Verint was allowed a contract to handle security of Montreal’s Metro transit system. The following is a documentary created by a member of the Canadian Action Party regarding Israel, Verint, and security on Montreal’s Metro:

Verint responsible for security at 9/11 airpots and at London’s Underground during 7/7 bombings

The Israeli’s expertise wasn’t good enough to thwart the large-scale terror attacks of 9/11 at the 7/7 bombings in London. How it is that a few supposed lone nuts directed from caves in Afghanistan could penetrate the strong security apparatus in the U.S. and England is beyond logic. It just smells like more false flag terrorism, perpetuated by a desperate villain looking to demonize and control their opposition. There are Israeli fingerprints all over the 9/11 attacks. What Israel has to gain by staging false flag terror attacks framing Muslims is numerous. Most importantly, it gives them the pretext to use their military might—the U.S. Military and their owned U.S. taxpayer-backed Israeli Defense Forces—to bomb any one of its oil-rich Arab neighbours into submission and expand its sphere of control over the region. This control further secures the United States’ numerous  Middle Eastern construction contracts and Arab puppet regimes.

ISIS is nothing more than an Israeli-CIA backed revolutionary group

cia_agent_badge-abu_bakr_al_baghdadi_aka_ali_baba_hq_langley_virginiaIsrael has gone on the record stating that ISIS—whose leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was trained by Mossad— is good for Israel’s interest. A Syrian envoy has accused Israel of being allied with ISIL. The ISIS threat is also good for the United States’ interest in snuffing out the Assad regime in Syria and securing oil futures not only for the US, but also for Israel (Golan Heights and Mediterranean sea next to Gaza). ISIS is purported to be the successor to Al Qaeda, whose public shelf life has apparently run out. This public relations rebranding of the so called Islamic global threat (ISIS/ISIL) is actually the creation of a French Jew named Bernard-Henri Lév. It appears that Israel may even have gone as far as faking the ISIS/ISIL beheadings in order to reinforce the perceived threat. Former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky, a Canadian Jew, exposed in the 1990s how Israel manages and uses the supposed Islamic threat,

Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.

—Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception – pg. 197

Whether or not Nehaf-Bibeau is truly the lone nut acting on behalf of the Islamic state that the mainstream media is portraying or if he is some kind of Manchurian candidate being used as part of a false flag attack, Prime Minister Harper is using this event to show the public how justified he was in sending troops to fight ISIS.

Uptalk is not just speech pathology; it’s covert social engineering

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 16, 2014 Anno Domini

An adaptation of modern artist Marcel Duschamp's urinal. Along with the organized attack on classical art there is an organized attack on classic speech.

An adaptation of modern artist Marcel Duschamp’s disgusting urinal. Along with the organized attack on classical art, there is an organized attack on classical speech. Uptalk appears to be a weapon in the social engineer’s arsenal.

Uptalk—the form of speech generally perceived as emanating from the vocal chords of young, diffident girls, where the voice rises toward the end of a declarative statement—has crept into Western speech habits as a covert saboteur of logic-based thinking.

Uptalk, also known as “valley girl” speech (from California), upspeak, rising inflection, or high rising terminal (HRT), has become so common among English speakers that most are not even aware of why or when they do it. It’s that highly irritative sound you hear in declarative statements that are not meant to be stated in the form of a question but are. An example using a hypothetical interview with an eyewitness to a crime on a newscast would go something like this:

“We were, like, walking down the street (?)… when we heard this loud crashing sound (?)… and there was, like, blood everywhere (?)….

Unfortunately, young girls typically do not grow out of this speech pathology and, what’s worse, they tend infect everyone within their social sphere, even their parents, and even grown men.

Linguists tend to view this speech pathology as indicative of insecurity in the speaker, who subconsciously raises their intonation in order to seek approval of their unsure “declaration”. It is argued that women are more susceptible to this speech pathology, as they tend to be less aggressive in their speech habits.

Believe it or not, there are actually people who defend this pathology and call it the progressive evolution of speech. Uptalk, they argue, indicates empathy in the speaker and creates a more comfortable and relaxed speech environment. This, despite the fact that healthy and confident English speakers can be as empathetic as anyone and can be as easy to talk to as one’s best friend. And there is nothing inherently feminine about uptalk. Truly feminine speech should be pleasant and elegant. Even those unable to clinically recognize uptalk as speech pathology know that there is just something about it that is irritating and unpleasant. Uptalk is ugly. It not only makes the uptalker unattractive, it also makes them sound less unique, since it is so ubiquitous.

Another speech pathology that is commonly associated with uptalkers is the use of the submodifier/conjunction “so” at the beginning of a response to a direct question. One can often hear professionals, experts, even doctors, using this annoying little speech impediment in interviews, especially on shows on National Public Radio (NPR). Like uptalk, this error is believed to have originated in the Silicon Valley tech sector. It appears the use of “so” at the beginning of a response to a direct question indicates a belief of superiority of the speaker. Linguists see it as indicating that the interviewee believes he is superior to the interviewer, and thus uses “so” to detach himself from having to answer directly to the question. Instead of responding with “yes” or “no” and continuing to explain why, the interviewee will begin with “so” (detachment) and go on a bit of a diatribe before eventually getting around to answering the question. These speakers also tend to use “so” frequently, almost in response to every single question in a series, and even at the beginning of fresh, declarative sentences.

The above examples of speech pathology are by no means the only diseases plaguing the great English language and its speakers. There are many. One need only look at the prevalent form of communication today by subcultures (ghettoized Africna Americans), for example, or those communicating by the plethora of mobile techno junk to know how much real, effective, and beautiful communication has deteriorated. But uptalk has a dastardly unique characteristic to it. It appears to be re-engineering how we think.

The source of uptalk is uncertain. It is claimed to have originated everywhere from Silicon Valley tech executives to Australians and seemingly timid Canadians, though, it is certain that it is not very old. It seems to have emerged right alongside the counter-culture revolution that began in the 1950s and ‘60s in the English-speaking world. The diffident nature of uptalk pseudo-statements seems to reveal that the speaker is unsure of basic facts and logic and therefore is caught up in some kind of subjectivist underworld of the dead. Columnist Hank Davis writes, in The Uptalk Epidemic,

“It’s a nasty habit. It is the very opposite of confidence or assertiveness. It’s gotten all out of control. These days, even statements about which there should be no question or doubt are presented in this tentative, timid and deferential manner. Here’s an example. I teach a 4th year university course in which part of the requirement is a seminar presentation. Students used to stand up and share the results of their research in a way that conveyed their confidence and knowledge. They no longer do. Even if they do feel confident, their culture now mandates that they dial it back and sound like this:

My name is Jennifer? My seminar today is on bystander apathy? There is quite a bit of research on this topic?”

Davis continues,

“Why all the questions, Jennifer? Just what is at issue here? Are you not sure of your name? Are you willing to change it if we don’t nod our approval? Why are you unsure of your seminar topic? Does that, too, require our approval?… I think we have an answer to that question. Making a declarative statement is no longer OK. It is not socially acceptable for a 21 year old woman to stand before an audience and tell us her name or what she knows without turning into a shy little girl whose statements are questions or pleas for consensus.”

The speech trend of uptalk is a social engineer’s dream come true. Instead of the brutish, laborious method of forcing a subject to accept a particular ideology, simply get the subject to believe this ideology was arrived at on his own by getting him to think and talk in subjectivist form. After all, how can anything be for certain when one cannot simply state anything with certainty? Now the subject is ripe for social engineering by elites who know for certain in which direction they want to guide us.

2012-11-24cogitduck022

So it follows that uptalk has arrived on the scene simultaneously with the surge of socially engineered public education, particularly that advanced by the United Nations Agenda 21, Common Core initiative. Common Core re-education is fairly obvious collectivist, secular humanist propaganda, designed to rip out from the minds of the youth any concept of God, country, family, or any shred of high scholastic logic (in Common Core mathematics, for example, 2+2 does not necessarily equal 4, they claim). Are social engineers also attempting to emasculate men with uptalk or is this all merely “progressivism”? It’s more common to encounter women who are unsure of themselves than men. Men are natural leaders, and even when they are unsure of themselves, they tend to behave and speak as if they are. For men, real men, uptalk is a direct path to emasculation—and with it, patriarchal Christian mores. For women, uptalk instills in them a false sense of feminine speech. For both sexes, uptalk is anti-logic, counter intuitive, and rewires their brains to think in subjectivist terms.

The phenomenon of uptalk may not be the direct work of social engineers, but it certainly appears to be the devil child of the counter-culture revolution of the 1960s and beyond, perhaps stretching back to the anti-classicism of the Enlightenment saboteurs.

 

Khazar theory a scapegoat for Jews

James_Tissot_The_Morning_Judgment_400By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 7, 2014 Anno Domini

Regardless of if those who call themselves “Jews” today are indeed the descendants of Abraham, they are behaving in the spirit of the ancients who rejected Christ.

That is what matters most. People who obsess on the racial heritage of today’s Jews are missing the bigger picture. However, there is some value to the racial heritage question on a secular level. For example, if today’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham, how then can they, according to the Zionist view, justifiably claim a Biblical right to Palestine? But the focus of this article will be the Khazar theory as scapegoat for Jews and their anti-Christian behaviour.

Much of the confusion, present mainly in Protestant circles, is caused by a misunderstanding of Jesus words found in Saint John’s Apocalypse, chapter 2, verse 9.

I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

The confused are rendering this passage carnally, saying that Jesus was singling out only “fake Jews” as the synagogue of Satan but not the true descendants of Abraham. The root cause of this confusion stems from the heresy of dual covenant theology, which states that Jews are saved based on their race alone, not on their faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. The truth of the matter is that Jesus was speaking of the spiritual bankruptcy of ethnic Jews.

 

Khazars didn’t exist when Jesus spoke against the Synagogue of Satan

khazaria1The Khazar Empire, a medieval power that lay just north of the theocratic Christian Byzantium Empire, is believed to have been established around the 7th century A.D., several hundred years after Christ walked the Earth. During the 8th century, many of its nobles converted to Judaism. It is believed that many or most of today’s European (Ashkenazi) Jews are descended from this Turkish Khazar tribe. How is it, then, that Jesus could have been referring to these supposed “fake” Khazar Jews in His admonishment of the Synagogue of Satan throughout the Gospels? Were the Jews to whom He spoke indeed the literal descendants of Abraham? The answer is unequivocally, yes. In almost all of Jesus’ discourse with the Zionist Jews of His time, he focused on their spiritual blindness, not on their supposed racial legitimacy. In the following passage, Jesus makes it clear that the faithful spirit that was present with Abraham, not ethnicity, is what counts. The following passage also proves that Jesus did not view the Synagogue of Satan as Khazar Jews.

I know that you are the children of Abraham: but you seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and you do the things that you have seen with your father. They answered, and said to him: Abraham is our father. Jesus saith to them: If you be the children of Abraham, do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill me, a man who have spoken the truth to you, which I have heard of God. This Abraham did not. You do the works of your father. They said therefore to him: We are not born of fornication: we have one Father, even God. Jesus therefore said to them: If God were your Father, you would indeed love me. For from God I proceeded, and came; for I came not of myself, but he sent me: Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. (John 8:37-43)

Jesus then exposes the true source of their spirit.

You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. (John 8:44)

The consistent message in the New Testament is that one’s spirit towards Christ will determine his ultimate destiny, heaven or hell…to be reborn of the Spirit or to remain in the spirit of bondage to sin. There is no way of carnalizing the Gospels and making them about heritage or ethnicity.

these stones

 

The terms “Jew” and “Israel” were redefined by Christ’s coming

Adding to the confusion of the identity of the Synagogue of Satan is the definition of the term “Jew” in the Bible. In the New Testament, there are instances where Jew refers to a racial/national group and other instances where Jews are referred to as a spiritual group. Still yet, Jews are also referred to as an adversarial group, summed up in the term “Synagogue of Satan” and hinted at in passages like “they hid for fear of the Jews.” So how are we to determine what “Jew” means? Historian E. Michael Jones has a solid grasp of the variation in application of the term “Jew.”

When St. John uses the words “oi Ioudaioi,” he is referring to a group that has rejected Christ. The coming of Christ changed Jewish identity forever, something the Jews at His time comprehended only with difficulty. From then, the terms “Israelite” and “Jew” were no longer synonyms, because, Ferdinand Hahn points out in Caron’s book, “the true Israelites” from the Christian perspective “are precisely those who, like Nathaniel, recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

—E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 33-34

Upon Christ’s arrival…the situation changes, for the Jews have to accept Christ to remain Israel…John uses the term “Jew” two ways. He begins by saying that “Salvation comes from the Jews,” and ends by saying those who call themselves “Jews” are not children of Abraham or Moses and, in fact, have Satan as their father. From identifying the word Jew with “we,” as he does with the Samaritan woman, Jesus goes on to refer to what John calls “Jews” as “you,” which is to say, a group that does not include Jesus. Accepting or rejecting the Messiah becomes the principal way of defining what it means to be a Jew. (p. 36)

In other words, the true meaning of what it means to be a Jew has to do with the spirit that was present with Abraham. By rejecting Christ, the Jews also rejected Abraham, for the Spirit of Christ was with Abraham. However, now, the term “Jew” has been redefined as a rejecter of Christ, regardless of ethnicity; for the Jews, in their rejection of Christ, accepted Satan as their father.

There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)

One who distinguishes him or herself as Jewish is declaring their rejection of Christ and the spiritual redefinition of God’s people in the above passage from Galatians. Israel is the spiritual body of Christ, composed of the faithful, from all races. Spiritual Israel and the Church are one and the same. Fleshly Israel has been put away.

That because the rebellious Israel had played the harlot, I had put her away, and had given her a bill of divorce: yet her treacherous sister Juda was not afraid, but went and played the harlot also herself. (Jeremiah 3:8)

Scapegoating Jews

Those who continue to advance the lie that Jesus was referring to Khazar Jews when He admonished the Synagogue of Satan are not only guilty of falsifying history but also of excusing ethnic Jews of their rejection of Jesus the Messiah. There can be no excuse for a Jew, or anyone, who rejects Jesus. In a religious and spiritual context, the Khazar debate is irrelevant. There is no validity in the dichotomy of “fake Jews” vs. “real Jews” outside of St. John’s definition of “Jews”.  And Jewish behaviour today cannot be excused away as being the rotten fruits of Turkish impostors. Jewish behaviour today is no different than it was 2,000 years ago when the Jews cried for the release of the criminal Barabbas over Jesus and for Herod to crucify the Messiah. The likely reason why some push the Khazar theory is in a cowardice attempt to avoid being labelled a racist or anti-Semite whilst implicating “Khazars” in crimes and conspiracy.

Yet no man spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)

Another group advocating the Khazar scapegoat are British Israelists (Christian Identity) and some white nationalists. Under the same spiritual blindness as Jews, this group rationalizes that if they can make today’s Jews out to be racial impostors of the ancient Hebrews, they themselves will inherit the birthright or, a more extreme view, they are the true descendants of the Hebrews. The latter view has its roots in the millenarianist heresy that plagued England during the Protestant Reformation.

More disturbing, perhaps, is the fact that many evangelical Christians embrace the Khazar scapegoat, in an attempt to deify the Jews. To avoid implicating their god race in the world conspiracy—on the rare occasion when they actually admit a world conspiracy exists—these Christian Zionists dismiss it as being merely the work of the Khazar tribe, not “true Jews”. What they are saying then is that “true” racial Jews are racially incapable of sin, racially incapable of being the conspirators leading the New World Order. Of course, this is completely absurd and completely contrary to the basic tenets of Christianity. This belief is more in line with something from the Third Reich than the Bible.


Genealogical records destroyed along with the Temple
It is next to impossible to argue that destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the slaughter of one million Jews (according to Titus Flavius Josephus) in 70 AD was not the work of God that brought the Old Covenant to fulfillment as well as prophet Daniel’s Seventy Weeks prophecy. But also destroyed by divine will were all genealogical records of the ancient Hebrews. This is not only a major problem for racialists today, it is further evidence of the deeper spiritual truth behind the chosen-people archetype. If God intended for a small Hebrew tribe to rule the world for eternity, surely He would have kept in tact proof of this tribe’s racial authenticity. But since this was not the case, the loss of the Temple records is further evidence that God’s intention from the beginning was a faithful universal people unto Him, with the ancient Hebrew era serving as a mere type of bigger things to come. Saint Paul drives this home in his instruction to Timothy:

As I desired thee to remain at Ephesus when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some not to teach otherwise, not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith.  (1Timothy 1:3-4)

 

COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

tip of the spear jonesBy Timothy Fitzpatrick
August 19, 2014 Anno Domini

As the evidence continues to mount that Alex Jones is a counter-intelligence Zionist agent, the conspirators handling him are scrambling to throw the general public off the scent of the stinking COINTELRPO operation in Austin, Texas.

That’s where two diversionary strawman theories come into play: that Jones is a secret Jesuit agent and/or that Jones is really Bill Hicks, a deceased comedian and social critic from Texas.

 

Shills accuse Jones of being a Jesuit

The first theory is an obvious lie. Zionists have been using the Jesuit conspiracy theory for hundreds of years to cover up their own crimes, to keep people off their tails, and to defame their long-time enemy, the Catholic Church. While the Jesuit conspiracy theory is growing in general, it has been directed at Alex Jones as of late. The rhetoric goes that Jones is working on behalf of this alleged Jesuit-run New World Order, with the proof being that Jones never talks about the Jesuits. However, there are countless instances where Jones has talked about and criticized the Vatican and the Catholic Church. Jones has even denounced on air the theory that he is a Jesuit. There aren’t a lot of people being taken in by this theory, but the few who advocate it are vocal and get their message out with much persistence and consistency. If they aren’t being paid to do this, they are very passionate about it. If the shills don’t call Jones a Jesuit, they will call him either a Knight of Malta (no proof), or, if they have a hard time convincing someone of that, they will simply say then that he is Jesuit trained (again, no proof). One nut claims that because Jones uses the Swiss cross as the logo for his health products, he must be a Swiss Knight Templar, even though the Templars weren’t Jesuits, even though the Knights Templars haven’t existed for hundreds of years, other than the freemasons using the name only. The use of the Swiss cross as an international symbol is well known. And for all we know, Jones could deliberately have used the symbol to mess with his critics. After all, he has the incentive to indulge those who accuse him of being a Jesuit. Whatever takes the focus off of what he really is.

One of many examples of Alex Jones covering the goings on at the Vatican. So much for the theory that he is a secret Jesuit.

One of many examples of Alex Jones covering the goings on at the Vatican. So much for the theory that he is a secret Jesuit.

The Jesuit conspiracy theory has been spread by a small group of people, including Zionist diamond merchant Eric Jon Phelps, Alexander Hislop, F. Tupper Saussy, the Seventh Day Adventist Church (a Zionist offshoot), Malachi Martin (financed by the American Jewish Committee to spread disinformation about the Jesuits), establishment fictionalist Dan Brown, Edward Hendrie, and a few others. (In the near future, I will critique the Jesuit conspiracy theory in more detail)

Shills accuse Jones of being Bill Hicks

Screen shot 2014-08-19 at 3.15.26 PMThe other theory, that Jones is Bill Hicks, is so over the top and so ridiculous that nobody in their right mind would give it any attention. But that doesn’t matter, the point of this theory, and that of the Jesuit theory, is to muddy the waters, to divert attention away from Jones numerous connections to the Zionist establishment and the intelligence community. The source of this theory appears to be a blogger named “Mack Quigley,” who appears to have created many videos and designed many photo illustrations detailing the alleged proof that Jones is Hicks. This media is now circulating widely around the net, as is the media calling Jones a secret Jesuit. The story goes that Hicks didn’t really die but changed his identity to Alex Jones with the aid of facial surgery. Like the Jesuit theory, this theory appears to be another Zionist-created diversion. Quigley admits on his site that he is a Zionist. When he is not busy manipulating his “evidence” that Jones is Hicks, he is posting Zionist hate, like the following:

God Bless Israel – May they Destroy their Arab Enemies

The mindless echo-chamber of fake ‘alternative’ news is full of hypocritical morons and race-baiting Jew-haters who can’t think straight – and don’t want to because that’s part of their psyop. It’s fashionable for these clowns to use words like “criminal” to describe the State of Israel’s lawful conduct – even when it is defending itself against alien domestic insurgents operating within their own territory killing Israeli citizens.

I support Israel. From the Nile to the Euphrates, all that land belongs 100% to the Jews alone. It is their homeland forever. The Arabs need to get out and stay out. Their blood is on their own heads for trying to steal land that doesn’t belong to them.

We have lived to see a very interesting day. I can’t help but think we are on the verge of World War 3 and the tribulation period. Which means the rapture could happen at any time.

Even so come quickly Lord Jesus!

Incidentally, Quigley’s blog appears to have been created early in 2012, around the same time news of Jones’ ties to Stratfor broke and a year following the hack of Stratfor’s emails. And wouldn’t you know it, Quigley just happens to endorse the sister strawman attack against Alex Jones:

It’s reminiscent of how a documentary film-maker joined Fred Phelps church and suddenly they were making professional signs and had all sorts of web promotion. Either is Sanderson is a sincere and naive idiot who doesn’t realize he is being used, or he is involved with the Alex-Jones/Wittenberger crowd knowingly. Jesuits love the tactic of infiltration and subversion.

—Mack Quigley, Are Jews Christ Killers?

There seems to be a definite co-ordinated effort to discredit and quash Jones’ legitimate critics.

Jesuit-Hicks theories help Alex Jones stay in power

Because the two theories against Jones are so easily disprovable (what makes them each a strawman argument), it creates the perception that critics of Alex Jones are crazy or fulfills Jones’ claim that his critics are government operatives merely looking to discredit him. The claim that Jones is a Zionist double agent, however, is very easily demonstrable and is the only true threat to Jones in his position as patriot leader. So, it’s likely that Jones and his handlers, if they aren’t behind these strawman attacks, are welcoming them with open arms.

For more on the Alex Jones saga, read the following:

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

The Stratfor Infowar – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

 

Jewish confessions to false flag terror

Slip of the tongue or macabre mockery?

Israel’s terrorist arm of the government, Mossad, admits (accidentally?) they did 7/7 London bombings

 

Larry Silverstein admits they pulled World Trade Center Building 7…what else did they pull?

 

Now, we are waiting for a confession on the Oklahoma City Bombing

Ryder Mossad OKC 1995 terrorism

Henry Makow duped by Zionist

The Fall of Jerusalem

The Fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
August 12, 2014 Anno Domini

Normally I wouldn’t critique an article from Henry Makow’s website, as he posts from a number of different authors and on a wide variety of topics, not with all of which I agree. But because of the sensitive nature of the last month, the Gaza massacre, and because Mr. Makow is a popular anti-Zionist researcher, I felt it incumbent upon me to call out what I see as the Zionist subversion of his website.

On August 9, Makow published an article by Chris Glover entitled Is Israeli Aggression Based on End Times Prophesy? A quick search turned up nothing about the author, so there is little we can go on about the author’s motives other than what he has written. The article argues that despite the “satanic assault on Gaza”, it’s all going according to Bible prophecy and the media’s heavy focus on Gaza is hastening worldwide indignation against Israel, which the Bible supposedly said would happen in the “end times.”

Glover sets the tone early in the article for his propaganda with,

According to the Bible and the Book of Revelations, all the nations of the world will turn against Israel during the end times.

This is the typical premillennial-dispensationalist heresy of futurism—the myths of which I dispel in The Jewish command to deceive Christians about Bible prophecy (I asked Mr. Makow to republish this article at his website in response to Glover’s piece, but there has been no action on it at this time). Firstly, it makes the profound error of assuming that today’s Israel constitutes the Israel spoken of in the Bible and that God has any use for the physical nation of Israel as it was over 2,000 years ago. Furthermore, to support this heretical contrivance, the author makes a weak argument for what he perceives as the increased media attention on the Gaza massacre. Frankly, the media has under-reported the matter and, in the case of American media, portrayed Gaza as the villain. But that doesn’t matter to Glover. He must stretch the truth in order to support his remaining arguments. And any truths Glover tells, like that the Mossad-CIA alliance is behind the ISIS-ISIL threat, is overshadowed by his eschatological confusion.

After Glover has sucked the reader in with talk of false flags in the Middle East and Ukraine, which are mostly true, he finally lays down another heretical bombshell.

He will have a covenant with Israel and crush its enemies. But Israel must be hated by the nations in order for this to happen. Is this what the mainstream media is playing into at the current time?

Another typical futurist lie based on a misinterpretation of the Book of Daniel, Chapter 9, verse 26-27, where it’s supposedly talking about an anti-Christ figure making a seven-year peace treaty with Israel and it’s Islamic neighbours. In reality, this portion of Daniel is talking about Jesus confirming the New Covenant with all who would believe. The time period in which Jesus was prophesied to confirm this was seven years—the final week of Daniel’s Seventy Weeks.

Makow, or Glover, introduce the article with a couple of passages from the Old Testament:

Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup, one that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured. And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it.

—Zechariah 12:2-3

The Orthodox Christian interpretation of these two passages is that they were fulfilled in 70 A.D., when Rome—an empire of many nations, the world as such—encompassed Jerusalem with a siege, slaughtered one million Jews (according to Josephus), looted and burnt the Temple, and left Jerusalem utterly desolate, as Jesus said would happen.

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate : and I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. —Luke 13:35

This effectively and permanently ended the Jewish age of history. Any chance for the Jews to receive salvation now lies with their acceptance of Christ. Israel as a nation is now no longer needed, as the bigger picture, as was intended from the beginning, is that all peoples, from all nations would come to the truth.

The only sense in the “world turning against Israel” is with respect to the Church, which is the true Israel of God. That certainly is and will continue to happen, which will hasten the real end times. And Israel, as we know it, will likely not even exist in the end times, although Jerusalem will likely by the capital of some New Age one-world government. But what Glover is advancing is fundamentally Zionist, despite his seeming distaste with “Zionist-Kabbalists”.

 

Hamas rocketeers are Israeli Shin Bet

The following is a semi-satirical video produced by freedom fighter Brendon O’Connell several years ago before his imprisonment. It is still very relevant. It demonstrates how Hamas, which was created by Israel, is no friend to the Palestinians and is, in fact, a controlled opposition caper working for Israel in order to give the Israelis the pretext to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians. It also keeps rank-and-file Jews in obedience through fear. It’s a classic false flag deception.

 

Remember what former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky revealed in the early 1990s:

Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete.

—Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception – pg. 197

For those not familiar with how the Zionist terrorist network in Israeli is structured, Ostrovsky gives the following illustration in By Way of Deception (1990):

Structure

Note: Shin Bet is now Shaback, which is basically like the FBI. However, this information is likely slightly outdated, as Ostrovsky’s books were published in the early 1990s. The Mossad (like America’s CIA) is Israel’s crown assassination Golem.

Alex Jones using hypnosis, subliminals, and NLP on audience

Alex Jones the hypnotist

Alex Jones the hypnotist

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 23, 2014 Anno Domini

In Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?, I discussed how Alex Jones serves as cathartic relief for those resisting the New World Order and how he helps to get the masses comfortable with the NWO, thereby diffusing their opposition to it, making for a smoother transition to the one-world government.

To expand on that, I will break down some of the more technical methods Jones uses to psychologically traumatize his audience into accepting the New World Order, including his use of subliminal messages and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), which is basically the manipulation of communication to provoke at the subconcious level (here is a good video example of how powerful NLP can be). NLP is most prominently used by salesman and mind programmers.

Suggestive Programming (NLP), Affirmations, and double meaning

The most obvious and ubiquitous programming Jones uses is the power of suggestion. You can set your watch by it. As of the writing of this article, Jones did it today on his show. He does it every single show. And that suggestion is the seemingly snide imitation of the elite. If you are listener, you know what I am talking about. It’s when Jones raises his voice and assumes the personality of one of the “elite” and then goes on to mock us victims of the NWO. He does not do this merely to entertain you. It is subtle suggestion and mockery of the victim—you, the listener. It’s a sort of psychodrama. What results from this process is the instilling of fear and learned helplessness into the listener (see Learned helplessness through the alternative media). And if I and many others are correct that Jones is working for the bad guys, then this suggestive programming is to mock us, which feeds their appetite as they destroy us with their world takeover.

As the mountebank delivered his harangue, the clown would repeatedly poke his head out from bemacabrehind the curtain, making fun of everything his master said, parodying his patter and twisting the meaning of his words. The mountebank played the perfect straight man, meanwhile. Here he was, trying so hard to hawk his wares, and his own assistant was doing everything possible to undermine sales.

The merriment was of course intentional. While the clown seemingly encouraged the public not to buy the proffered merchandise, the mountebank knew full well that the bystanders would easily be converted into customers as soon as they forgot that they were, in fact, supposed to be buying. Once the audience had been effectively hypnotized, once its judgment and willpower had been weakened, the real sales pitch could begin…[i]

Does not John H. Townsen’s quote above remind you of Jones as he disingenuously mocks the NWO elite, specifically when he dressed up in clown makeup in a seeming mockery of US President Barack Obama? Researcher Michael Hoffman describes this suggestive programming as part of the Judeo-Masonic revelation of the method:

The alchemical principle of the Revelation of the Method has as its chief component, a clown-like, grinning mockery of the victim(s) as a show of power and macabre arrogance. When this is performed in a veiled manner accompanied by certain occult signs and symbolical words and elicits no meaningful response of opposition or resistance from the target(s), it is one of the most efficacious techniques of psychological warfare and mind-rape.

This ceremonial nose-thumbing, this perverse jesting and clowning is taken to the highest level of intensity by the Truth or Consequences principle which ultimately hinges upon the issue of consent.[ii]

In other words, as it applies to this case, Jones is mocking the victims of the NWO whilst gaining their consent to the tyranny.

Infospells

In case you doubt that Jones uses or is even aware of NLP, the proof that he at least knows about it is in his film 911 The Road To Tyranny, in which he accurately points out George W. Bush using an NLP technique on the American people. Jones has also admitted to being well read in Edward Bernays’ book Propaganda. Bernays, a pioneer in public relations, was the nephew of Jewish kabbalist Sigmund Freud, who created the black art of psychoanalysis—something Jones also admits to using, at least on himself.

Another type of suggestion that Jones uses is to speak from the point of view of an elitist telling us how we must obey. Again, he does this nearly every show. To this conscious mind, this may seem harmless, but the unconscious mind interprets this message as a command, no matter how facetious the message may appear. In this example, Jones says “You will accept the love of Lucifer.” Again, if you pay close attention to his speech patterns, you will notice and example of this this in almost every show he does. He is breaking you, the listener, down. Here is another example where Jones assumes the role of Satan. Someone discovered yet another clip of Jones, in reverse speech, saying “I am Satan.”

Another, less used, technique Jones uses is the classic repetition command. At times you will hear him repeat a word or phrase. In mind control, a repetition count of three is the most common. See if you can find it in Jones’ dialogues. In just one example, in 911 The Road To Tyranny, you can find a repetition count of three in a few instances. Here us another example. He probably does it every show.

Trauma-based mind control

The element of fear can never be overstated. If you put aside Jones’ loud-mouthed, charismatic act, all you are left with is bad news, fear, and negativity. Between all the bad news going on with the New World Order takeover and Jones’ shouting fits, the listener hasn’t got a chance.

One form of trauma involves opposites (alternating leniency with harshness). Jones will speak very calmly and eloquently one minute, and the next minute, he is shouting at the top of his lungs, snarling and flailing his arms about. He will go back and forth between these two extremes. This is designed to traumatize the listener: hot and cold, violence and peace, stress and calm.

When leniency is alternated with harshnessness, the effect is devastating and disconcerting because the person looses the ability to predict what is going to happen. Everyone likes to control his or her life. Predicting what is going to happen is part of a person’s mind gaining control over their environment. Even that control is stripped from a slave. They soon learn to quit trying to protect themselves, and they quit trying to think for themselves but docilely submit to whatever fate assigns them…. The slave must reorganize reality through identification with aggressor (Illuminati master). Strong identification is created with the master. The slave is programmed to protect the master.[iii]

See how many times Jones will take you through this process in one show. This is further breaking you down, weakening your spirit, and strengthening the state of helplessness in you. Note in the above quote how the trauma aids the victim in identifying with their aggressor, in this case, Alex Jones. Could this by why his followers hang on his every word and defend him as if he is completely infallible?

Another aspect of fear that I must mention is subliminal messaging. We have proof that Alex Jones has used this at least on one occasion. My guess is that there are probably many more such instances; we just haven’t detected them yet. In the following clip from Jones’ documentary Police State 4: The Rise of Fema, a subliminal is flashed that is read by the subconscious mind as “submit to fear.” But it’s not like Jones needs to use a lot of these, as his show is already saturated with fearmongering messages.

Hollywood programming

A scene from Scanner Darkly depicting a character wearing an obvious Judeo-Masonic Illuminati symbol.

The first thing one hears when they tune in to the Alex Jones show is the theme for the imperial forces of Darth Vader in the kabbalist-based Hollywood film The Empire Strikes Back, part of the Star Wars franchise. According to CIA MKUltra mind control researchers, Star Wars and even Star Trek are recurring themes in mind control programs. The music for the empire in Star Wars represents evil and darkness, at least as far as kabbalists understand it. Why would Jones use such a dark theme as the theme for his supposed resistance to the New World Order world empire? Contradictory, no? It is likely more suggestive programming.

Few people seem to have any problems with Jones’ close connections with Hollywood, whether it’s his friendship with the decadent drug addict Charlie Sheen, Jones appearing in two Zionist Hollywood films,[iv] or Jones making frequent analogous references to movies during the Infowars show. Anyone with any wisdom knows that television and Jewish-masonic Hollywood are key channels of control for the world conspirators. For Jones to be so closely tied to Hollywood is hypocritical at best or sinister at worst. Either he is in on the scam or just a dupe. But for someone as intelligent as Jones—one who executes the sophistication of such things as neuro-linguistic programming, the case seems to by the former.

Jones was featured as a “street prophet” in the 2006 film Scanner Darkly, starring Keanu Reeves, Robert Downey Jr., and the Winona Ryder. Those who have studied Hollywood mind control know that sigil magic is frequently used, so they shouldn’t be surprised when they see a character in Scanner Darkly wearing a T-shirt with a picture of the all-seeing eye encompassed by a pyramid. Apparently, Jones has no problem being a part of this. He also doesn’t seem to have a problem with the technocratic theme of the movie, even though he claims to oppose the “scientific dictatorship” and the technocracy.

Infowars Mnemonic circles

Each one of these mnemonic circles is actually animated, so it swirls. Most of these examples are from June 2014 Infowars shows. Here are links to the actual animated video clips from the Alex Jones show: June 19, June 20, July 3, and unknown date.

Hypnotic spiral, Mnemonic circles

There are several ways to induce a hypnotic trance. Some of the more popular ones include the hypnosis spiral, the use of an object that glitters such as a piece of jewelry or a gold watch, and progressive relaxation.[v]

 Most of you are probably familiar with the black and white spiral of the hypnotist that goes around and around until the viewer is lulled into a trance. Today the Zionist controlled press uses these hypnotic spirals, just in a much more sophisticated way. This example from TSN/ESPN sports show, SportsCenter, shows the hypnotic circles being flashed continuously at the introduction of the show, during, and at the conclusion of the show. You can find these mnemonic circles just about everywhere on TV, but mainly on news channels. BBC, Russia Today, and NBC are some of the many who are using them. You would expect it from the mainstream media, but not from alternative media. Sadly, Jones’ Infowars and PrisonPlanet presentations are chock full of them. Below are some examples with links to actual video showing animated swirling, designed to put Infowars listeners into a trance. The effect is that the trance will allow certain parts or all of the message to bypass the critical portion of the brain—where we analyze for truth what we are seeing and hearing—and seep into the subconscious. You might say that trances reaffirm other forms of mind manipulation—a sort of insurance policy on propaganda.

Sigil magicJones devil

Sigils are symbols. And when used by occultists, these symbols are believed to induce spells and trances. Hand gestures, NLP body movements, and symbols—Jones uses them all. Most notable are his use of the “V” symbol, the 666 (A-OK), and baphomet hand gestures. According to one astute observer, Jones use the 666 sign any time he is talking about the elite (specifically the government or the European Union). In Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy? I documented Jones’ fomenting of violence among his listeners. One observer has apparently discovered a call to violence through and NLP technique. One thing to note about the “V” symbol that Jones is always pushing is that in the TV series V, the alien subversion of Earth is represented by “V”. The V people are a euphemism for fifth column insurgents.

All of this is just too coincidental, especially considering what we already know about Jones, namely that he has close ties to the intelligence community and the Israel lobby. His tactics are becoming more and more transparent.

Alex Jones trained in NLP at Stratfor?

It is interesting that Stratfor—an Israeli-CIA intelligence gathering firm established in Austin, Texas in 1996— was on the mailing list of the International Hypnosis Research Institute, an organization that offers neuro-linghuistic programming training. The anonymous hack of Stratfor’s emails a few years ago also revealed that Marko Papic, a geopolitical analyst with Stratfor, discussed NLP with Kevin Leahy of Knowledge Advocate. With what we already know about Alex Jones’ connections to Stratfor, it wouldn’t be a stretch to see him getting trained through Stratfor. The various NLP groups could have contracts with the CIA.

Michael McWhirter

Michael McWhirter

Another Stratfor-Infowars-NLP connection is with a visual effects artist named Michael McWhirter, who worked on several of Alex Jones’ films, including TerrorStorm, The Obama Deception, and Fall of the Republic. Mcwhirter has also contributed to Hollywood films, but he is currently listed as systems developer for a company named Aon Hewitt, a provider of human capital and management services, in Austin, Texas. At the time of the hack, Stratfor had membership with Aon Hewitt. What’s more, McWhirter is a member of an NLP meetup in Austin, Texas. In his meetup profile, McWhirter writes of himself, “I’ve studied/practiced NLP and related therapies for about 8 years and have applied my studies towards my own system of personal navigation and belief pattern exploration.”

Notes

[i] Towsen, John H., “Clowns”, E P Dutton (November 1976)

[ii] Hoffman, Michael A., “Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare”, Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992. p. 90.

[iii] Wheeler, Cisco; Springmeier, Fritz “The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave”, Ch. 9

[iv] Alex Jones (III), Internet Movie Database (IMDB) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1093953/?ref_=fn_al_nm_2

[v] Bergen, D. “Hypnosis Spiral and Other Methods to Induce Hypnotic Trance” http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/33138/alternative_medicine/hypnosis_spiral_and_other_methods_to_induce_hypnotic_trance.html

Modernity: the Judaeo-Masonic cult of ugly

Revelation of the Method & Alex Jones

Read More here: How Alex Jones is helping the NWO

Revelation of the Method

The occult concept of the Revelation of the Method is the way the Judeo-Masonic elite program us to accept their control. By telling us what they will do before and/or after they do it, they create fear, paranoia, and mockery. They also believe that because we have been told, we are accepting their chains that bind us.

Psychodrama

1. an extemporized dramatization designed to afford catharsis and social relearning for one or more of the participants from whose life history the plot is abstracted

2. a dramatic narrative or work characterized by psychological overtones

3. an often ongoing psychological struggle; also :  an expression of psychological turmoil

 

Related:

The growing complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections

Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

Learned helplessness through the alternative media

Stratfor had two Alex Joneses

Alex Jones creating bogus stories to circumvent Stratfor revelations

Infowars photo op at Stratfor?

Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review

The Stratfor Infowars – Wikileaks reveals more on Kinky cointelpro Jones

Alternative media continues to ignore Alex Jones’ Stratfor connections

False opposition Mark Dice returns to the InfoWhores fold

Hypocrite Alex Jones as fake as Obama when crying

Alex Jones follows in the footsteps of Vladimir Zhirinovsky

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers